Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Oral Biol. 2011 Jul 31;57(1):15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.07.001

Antimicrobial Activity of Nanoemulsion on Cariogenic Planktonic and Biofilm Organisms

Karthikeyan Ramalingam 1,, Bennett T Amaechi 2, H Ralph Rawls 3, A Lee Valerie 4
PMCID: PMC3210916  NIHMSID: NIHMS313034  PMID: 21807359

Abstract

Introduction

Nanoemulsions (NE) are a unique class of disinfectants produced by mixing a water immiscible liquid phase into an aqueous phase under high shear forces. NE have antimicrobial properties and are also effective anti-biofilm agents.

Materials and Methods

The effectiveness of nanoemulsion and its components was determined against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei by live/dead staining. In vitro antimicrobial effectiveness of nanoemulsion against planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus casei, Actinomyces viscosus, Candida albicans and mixed culture was determined by a serial dilution technique to obtain minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration (MIC/MBC). In addition, efficacy was investigated by kinetics of killing, adherence and biofilm assays.

Results

Compared to its components, nanoemulsion showed notable antimicrobial activity against biofilm organisms, up to 83.0% kill within 1 min. NE dilutions ranging from 243 to 19683 were effective against planktonic S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus, C. albicans and mixed culture of these four strains as shown through MIC/MBC assays. NE showed antimicrobial activity against planktonic cells at high dilutions, confirmed by time kill studies. The level of adhesion on glass surface was reduced by 94.2 to 99.5 % in nanoemulsion treated groups (p < 0.001). 4-day-old S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus, C. albicans and mixed cultures biofilms treated with NE showed reductions of bacterial counts with decreasing dilutions (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

These results suggest that nanoemulsion has effective anti-cariogenic activity against cariogenic microorganisms and may be a useful medication in the prevention of caries.

Keywords: Nanoemulsion, cariogenic microorganisms, anti-caries, adherence, biofilm organisms

Introduction

Cariogenesis is the production of dental caries and can be defined as a multi-step process involving demineralization and remineralization rather than unidirectional demineralization of the tooth surface. Dental caries occurs by the action of acidogenic and aciduric bacteria, which interact with microorganisms in biofilms on dental surfaces. The dental biofilm is formed via adhesion of planktonic bacteria to a cellular pellicle coating the oral surface. Several types of bacteria participate in the formation of the dental biofilm [1]. More than five Streptococcus species and Actinomyces viscosus are regarded as early colonizers of tooth surfaces, while mutans streptococci such as Streptococcus sobrinus and Streptococcus mutans are considered to be late colonizers of the dental biofilm. Other species of microorganisms that are present in the oral cavity, such as Candida albicans and Lactobacillus casei, may also cause pathologies, particularly under specific conditions. Biofilm formation initiates plaque formation and the synthesis of glucan from sucrose by S. mutans, which is catalyzed by glucosyltransferases (GTFases). Dental plaque metabolizes the carbohydrates contained in foods, releasing organic acid metabolites that demineralize tooth surfaces, resulting in dental caries [2].

The prevention and control of dental caries is still considered a public health problem of the world's population. Nanoemulsions are a unique class of disinfectants produced by mixing a water immiscible liquid phase into an aqueous phase under high pressure. This procedure yields a uniform population of high energy droplets which are only kinetically stable, and which have the appearance and consistency of whole milk [3]. Nanoemulsions have broad biocidal efficacy against bacteria, enveloped viruses, and fungi by disruption of their outer membranes. The mixed immiscible preparations of soybean oil and water represent a new generation of disinfectants that selectively disrupt membranes of bacteria, fungi in dilutions up to 1:1000 and enveloped virus [4, 5, 6, 7, 8].

The nanoemulsion employed in this work contains cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), a quaternary ammonium salt. CPC is an effective antiplaque agent regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. It has been proposed for inclusion in a range of products for dental use, such as mouth rinses, toothpastes, varnishes, orthodontic adhesives and liners for glass ionomer cements [9-14]. The safety and efficacy of CPC have been evaluated extensively and proven based on cytotoxicity data collected from many animal studies [15-17]. Therefore, the use of a CPC-containing nanoemulsion to control the adhesion and biofilm formation of cariogenic bacteria on the tooth surface is a logical approach to prevent this common oral disease.

Material and Methods

Preparation of nanoemulsion and bacterial strains

The oil-in-water nanoemulsion has an oil phase of soybean oil (25% v/v of the total emulsion), cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) (1% w/v), and Triton X-100 (10% v/v) in 65% v/v deionized water. The mixture was emulsified with a microfluidizer (M-110L, Microfluidics, Newton, MA) by 2 passes at 20,000 psi and at room temperature. Particle size was measured using laser light scattering (Dynamic Light Scattering, Brookhaven Instruments, Holtsville, NY) [4]. In the present study, brain heart infusion (BHI) from Difco Laboratories (Detroit, MI) was used to culture Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus casei, Actinomyces viscosus, Candida albicans and mixed cultures of the four strains. For biofilm and adherence assays, cells were grown in BHI with 2% sucrose supplementation.

Activity of nanoemulsion and its components

S. mutans and Lactobacillus casei were grown in 4-well Lab-Tek chamber slides with cover slide (Nalge Nunc International, Naperville, IL) for 24 hrs at 37°C with BHI broth and 2% sucrose supplementation. The grown biofilm was treated with nanoemulsion, or with 1% CPC, 10% Triton X-100, or a combination of 1% CPC and 10% Triton X-100 for 1 min. Biofilms were stained with L 7012 LIVE/DEAD® BacLight™ Bacterial Viability Kit from Molecular Probes Inc. (Eugene, OR) as described by Neu and Lawrence [18]. The live/dead stain, stored at −20 °C, was warmed to room temperature and centrifuged prior to use. The staining solution, containing two components SYTO9 and propidium iodide, was mixed in equal quantities and applied to the wells for 15 min. The samples were immediately examined via the Olympus FV1000 confocal system on an IX81 microscope (Olympus Life Science, Center Valley, PA). Excitation wavelengths were 488 and 543. Image analysis was conducted as described elsewhere (Al-Ahmad et al., 2007). In order to quantify the ratio of green and red areas of the analyzed biofilm points, a maximal projection of each image stack was built using the program LSM Image Browser (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Using the image analysis program Image J1.42q (Wayne Rasband National Institute of health, USA), red and green projections were converted into merged black and white (B/W) images. In order to determine the area covered by all cells, live or dead, B/W intensity thresholds were manually set for each of the measured biofilm areas. The resulting red and green ratios were analyzed for their statistical significance.

Minimum inhibitory (MIC) and bactericidal (MBC) concentrations

Nanoemulsion was serially diluted with standardized cell suspension (107 CFU/ml) of S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus, C. albicans and mixed cultures of the four strains and incubated at 37°C overnight. The highest dilution where there was no growth was recorded as the MIC. For MBC testing, aliquots were plated onto Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar and incubated overnight at 37°C. The highest dilution where there were no survivors was recorded as the MBC.

Time kinetics

Overnight bacterial cultures of S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus, C. albicans and mixed cultures of the four strains were added to 1, 10, 100 and 250 dilutions of the emulsion in microtiter plates. After the addition of each culture, 1 ml samples were taken at 1, 5, 15, 30 and 60 min from inoculated emulsions and immediately diluted in 9 ml of BHI. For viable counts, BHI broth samples were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The optical density of the resulting broth was read at 490 nm [4].

Adherence assay

Overnight bacterial cultures containing 107 CFU/ml of S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus, C. albicans and mixed cultures of the four strains were added to nanoemulsion in different dilutions (1, 10, 100 and 250) in 5ml glass test tubes. The tubes were incubated aerobically (to simulate conditions in the mouth) at 37°C for 24h. Attached bacteria were fixed with 5ml of methanol per tube for 15 min. The tubes were then emptied and air dried. Each tube was then stained for 5 min with 5 ml of 1% (v/v) crystal violet. Excess stain was rinsed off by placing the tube under running tap water. The tubes were air dried and the dye bound to the adherent cells was removed with 5 ml of 33% (v/v) glacial acetic acid per tube. The optical density of the resulting solutions was read at 595 nm.

Chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% (v/v) (SigmaAldrich, St. Louis, MO) was used as positive control. At least three independent experiments were carried out for each experimental condition. In each case, the mean optical density of the negative control was subtracted from the readings of all other samples.

Biofilm assay

Biofilm formation of S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus, C. albicans and mixed cultures of the four strains in plastic microplates was performed as previously described by Stepanovic et al. [19]. A 20 μl portion of an overnight broth culture (107 CFU/ml) was added to each well of a 96-well tissue culture plate and was incubated aerobically, with mild agitation at 70 rpm, for 72 h at 37 °C. Every 12 h, the medium containing suspended bacterial cells was removed and an equal volume of fresh medium was added. After removing the supernatant media, the biofilms were treated with 1, 10, 50, 100, 200 and 250 μl emulsion for 30 min at room temperature and without agitation. Following this, the emulsion was removed and the wells were gently washed twice with sterilized distilled water. Quantification of viable cells in biofilms in plastic microplates was performed as previously described by Stepanovic et al. [19]. Attached bacteria were fixed with 250 μl of methanol per well for 15 min. The microplates were then emptied and air dried. Each well was then stained for 5 min with 250 μl of 1% (v/v) crystal violet. Excess stain was rinsed off by placing the microplate under running tap water. The microplates were air dried and the dye bound to the adherent cells was removed with 250 μl of 33% (v/v) glacial acetic acid per well. The optical density of the resulting solutions was read at 595 nm on a microplate reader.

Chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% (v/v) (SigmaAldrich, St. Louis, MO) was used as positive control. At least three independent experiments were carried out for each experimental condition. In each case, the mean optical density of the negative control was subtracted from the readings of all other samples.

Statistical procedure

Experiments were performed in triplicate. Each experiment was done with five replications of the same concentration with individual microorganisms. The means of five values were used for calculation of means and standard deviations. The assumptions of equality of variances and normal distribution of errors were checked for the response variables. Significant differences among the groups were established with ANOVA to analyze the factors X and Y followed by Tukey's test. P-values of p ≤ 0.001 were considered significant. For ANOVA analysis, concentrations of nanoemulsion and exposure time were considered factors in the kinetic study. Nanoemulsion concentration and microorganism group were considered factors for the adherence and biofilm study.

Results

Microfluidizer emulsification resulted in a narrow distribution of droplets with a mean diameter of 308 nm. This nanoemulsion (NE) was used for all experiments.

Effectiveness of nanoemulsion was greater than that of its components at 1 min, with cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), Triton X-100 (TRI) and CPC/TRI showing lower activity, Fig 2. Compared to the control, nanoemulsion showed 83% inhibition of S. mutans and Lactobacillus casei.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Effect of nanoemulsion and its components against S. mutans and Lactobacillus casei at 1 min. (CPC-Cetylpyridinium chloride; CPC/TRI - Cetylpyridinium chloride/ Triton X-100; TRI - Triton X-100; NE- Nanoemulsion)

Fig.2b Confocal micrographs of live/dead staining of S. mutans and Lactobacillus casei at 1 min. (CPC-Cetylpyridinium chloride; CPC/TRI - Cetylpyridinium chloride/ Triton X-100; TRI - Triton X-100; NE- Nanoemulsion)

Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of nanoemulsion (NE) for Streptococcus mutans (MIC 19683 and MBC 2187 dilutions), Lactobacillus casei (MIC 2187 and MBC 729 dilutions), Actinomyces viscosus (MIC 19683 and MBC 2187 dilutions), Candida albicans (MIC 2187 and MBC 729 dilutions) and mixed culture (MIC 2187 and MBC 243 dilutions) was tested. Higher MIC was observed for A. viscosus and S. mutans and no visible colonies were observed at 2187 dilution for A. viscosus and S. mutans. Inhibitory concentrations of NE used was 9-to 27- fold smaller than that of chlorhexidine (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration of nanoemulsion

Killing curves of nanoemulsion and chlorhexidine digluconate against S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus, C. albicans and mixed culture strains are shown in Fig. 4. In the present experiments we observed that nanoemulsion had faster and more powerful bactericidal activity than chlorhexidine. During incubation with cell suspensions, NE considerably reduced the number of survivors; lower dilutions of NE resulted in the fewest survivors, with a dilution of 1 showing the highest activity. Percentage reduction compared to chlorhexidine was 92.4% (A. viscosus), 88.6 (C. albicans), 85.2 (L. casei), 74.9 (S. mutans) and 88.2% for mixed organisms.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Effect of nanoemulsion and chlorhexidine digluconate on time kinetics (1, 5, 15, 30 and 60 mins) of A. viscosus (AC), C. albicans (CA), L. casei (LB), S. mutans (SM) and mixed culture of the four strains (MIX) with different dilutions (1, 10, 100 and 250) (NE- Nanoemulsion; Chlx- Chlorhexidine digluconate).

The inhibitory effect of NE on adherence of cells to the glass surfaces of test tubes was examined using growing cells of S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus, C. albicans and mixed culture. NE inhibited the adherence of the growing cells (Fig 5). When the data were subjected to ANOVA, it was found that adhesion of all strains was significantly affected by nanoemulsion (p < 0.001). The level of adhesion on glass surface was reduced 94.2 to 99.5 % in nanoemulsion-treated groups when compared to controls. Highest adherence was observed with A. viscosus and C. albicans. Adherence of S. mutans was reduced 96% with nanoemulsion and but only 74 % with chlorhexidine digluconate treated with 1 dilution.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Inhibitory effect of nanoemulsion on glass surface adherence of A. viscosus (AC), C. albicans (CA), L. casei (LB), S. mutans (SM) and mixed culture of four strains (MIX). (NE- Nanoemulsion; Chlx- Chlorhexidine digluconate

NE markedly inhibited S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus, C. albicans and mixed culture biofilm formation at quantities as low as 100, 200 and 250μl added to each microplate well, respectively (p < 0.001). Highest inhibition of biofilm formation was observed at the 250 μl level (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Inhibitory effect of nanoemulsion and chlorhexidine digluconate on biofilm formation of A. viscosus (AC), C. albicans (CA), L. casei (LB), S. mutans (SM) and mixed culture of the four strains (MIX) (NE- Nanoemulsion; Chlx- Chlorhexidine digluconate)

Discussion

The application of nanoemulsion as an antimicrobial agent is a new and promising innovation [3]. The investigation into the use of nanoemulsion as an antimicrobial agent was prompted by the known problem of development of antimicrobial resistant strains experienced with the use of existing agents due to the widespread, and sometimes inappropriate, use of antibiotics, disinfectants and antiseptics [20]. These drawbacks justify further research and development of new antimicrobial agents targeting specific pathogens while being safe for the host. Since the mechanism of action of NE appears to be the non-specific disruption of bacterial cell membranes, NEs would not result in the development of resistant strains. Due to their intrinsic features, NE can be further diluted in aqueous solutions and stored at a broad range of temperatures for up to 2 years. Nanoemulsions have been reported to have extensive bactericidal, sporicidal and virucidal effects [4, 5, 6, 7, 21]. NE at biocidal concentrations is nontoxic in short term application to skin, mucous membranes, and the gastrointestinal tract [7].

The addition of a cationic halogen-containing compound such as cetylpyridinium chloride places a positive surface charge on the nanodroplet by being incorporated as a co-surfactant [22]. Bacteria in dental plaque have a net negative surface charge [23, 24]. In addition, exopolysaccharide chains, which vary in size from 103 to 108 kDa, are usually negatively charged, sometimes neutral or rarely positively charged [25]. Positively charged nanodroplets should have increased potential to interact with the biofilm cells and matrix.

In addition to the above proposed action, quaternary ammonium salts such as CPC have antimicrobial activity of their own, apparently through multiple mechanisms. One mechanism is thought to be due to disruption of intermolecular interactions, causing a dissociation of cellular membrane lipid bilayers, compromising cellular permeability controls, and inducing leakage of cellular contents [26]. Longer exposure times may result in additional breakdowns of intracellular material which are indicative of autolysis [26, 27]. In addition, CPC has an inhibitory action against fructosyltransferases, extracellular enzymes which synthesize fructans from sucrose, which then play an important role in the progression of dental caries by serving as an extracellular nutrition reservoir for bacteria [28].

The application of nanoemulsions for the control of cariogenic biofilm has not been widely investigated, hence the objective of this present study. In this study, we showed that one NE has antimicrobial activity against cariogenic planktonic and biofilm S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus, C. albicans and mixed culture. MIC and MBC of NE on four strains and mixed culture show significant effectiveness, even at high dilutions. Myc et al., [29] found that the MIC of a different nanoemulsion never exceeded 0.1% of NE. When compared with earlier reports our NE showed very high activity [8, 20].

The nanoemulsion activity in the present study was 9- to 27-fold higher than that of chlorhexidine, which is currently the most potent antimicrobial agent against oral biofilm. However, chlorhexidine is limited in its applications in oral care as it may produce detrimental side effects such as tooth discoloration [30].

Time kinetics assays showed NE to reduce survivors up to 92.4% (A. viscosus), 88.6% (C. albicans), 85.2% (L. casei), 74.9% (S. mutans) and 88.2% (mixed culture). Our results are in agreement with previous findings that emulsion had bactericidal properties against Gram-positive and enteric pathogen species [7, 8, 20].

Since, in the dental caries process, adherence of S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus and C. albicans to the tooth surface occurs in the initial stage, inhibition of adherence is essential for the prevention of dental caries. The anti-cariogenic potential of NE may be attributed to their ability to inhibit the attachment of bacteria. NE is significantly effective in inhibiting the growth of four strains by inhibition of adherence to glass surfaces. Initial adherence and colonization thus form the key events in biofilm formation [31]. In addition, the in vitro anti-adherence of Candida albicans to oral buccal mucosal cells by low concentrations of CPC has been described [32, 33].

The capacity of NE to reduce biofilms of S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus and C. albicans was evaluated. Generally, exposure to emulsion for 30 min resulted in maximum reductions of biofilms and effectively reduced the numbers of the planktonic form. In addition, Al-Adham et al [34] found that a microemulsion was highly effective against biofilms of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Also, previous reports found that biofilm microorganisms are very resistant to typical cleaning agents, yet are susceptible to nanoemulsions [35]. However, in the present study, complete elimination of biofilm did not occur, possibly due to short exposure times. Further work needs to be carried out to investigate the mechanisms of the interactions between emulsions, cells in suspension and biofilms [20] and to improve the efficacy of NE against biofilms composed of organisms involved in the caries process.

The separate mechanisms of action of both nanoemulsions and CPC may be operating to reduce biofilm formation. It is possible that the positively charged emulsion remains attached to the biofilm for a longer time than does chlorhexidine and is therefore able to prevent the formation of further biofilm.

In conclusion, the nanoemulsion employed in this work has improved efficacy against microorganisms involved in the caries process in excess of the efficacy of the unemulsified components. CPC-containing nanoemulsion with droplets of mean diameter 308 nm showed remarkable inhibitory effects on the growth of cariogenic S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus and C. albicans at very high dilution. NE effectively inhibited adherence of these strains to glass surfaces and subsequent biofilm formation. The anti-adherence and anti-biofilm behavior suggest that NE could be useful for the development of promising anti-cariogenic agents.

Fig.1.

Fig.1

Light scattering image showing droplet size distribution of nanoemulsion

Acknowledgments

Supported by NIH/NIDCR K08DE018003

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Contributor Information

Karthikeyan Ramalingam, Email: ramalingamk@uthscsa.edu, Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA, Tel: 1 210 567 4584 Fax: 1 210 567 4587 Cell: 1 210 649 5976.

Bennett T. Amaechi, Email: Amaechi@uthscsa.edu, Associate Professor and Director of Cariology, Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA, Tel: 1 210 567 3185 Fax: 1 210 567 4587 Cell: 1 210 834 7675.

H Ralph Rawls, Email: RAWLS@UTHSCSA.EDU, Professor, Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA, phone: 210-567-6871 Fax: 210-567-3669 (Fax).

A Lee Valerie, Email: leev@uthscsa.edu, Assistant Professor, Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA, Phone: 210-567-6871 Fax: 210-567-3669 (Fax).

References

  • 1.Marsh PD, Bradshaw DJ. Microbial community of dental plaque. In: Newman HN, Wilson M, editors. Dental Plaque Revisited: Oral Biofilms in Health and Disease. UK Bioline; 1999. pp. 237–253. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kohler B, Birkhed D, Olsson S. Acid production by human strains of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus. Caries Res. 1995;29:402–406. doi: 10.1159/000262099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lawrence MJ, Rees GD. Microemulsion-based media as novel drug delivery systems. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2000;45:89–121. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00103-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Karthikeyan R, Amaechi BT, Rawls HR, Lee VA. Antimicrobial activity of nanoemulsion on cariogenic Streptococcus mutans. Archives of Oral Biology. 2011;56:437–445. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.10.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee VA, Karthikeyan R, Rawls HR, Amaechi BT. Anti-cariogenic effect of a cetylpyridinum chloride containing nanoemulsion. Journal of Dentistry. 2010;38:742–749. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Donovan BW, Reuter JD, Cao Z, Myc A, Johnson KJ, Baker JR., Jr Prevention of murine influenza A virus pneumonitis by surfactant nano-emulsions. Antiviral Chemistry and Chemotherapy. 2001;11:41–49. doi: 10.1177/095632020001100104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hamouda T, Hayes MM, Cao Z. A novel surfactant nanoemulsion with broad-spectrum sporicidal activity against Bacillus spores. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:1939–1949. doi: 10.1086/315124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hamouda T, Myc A, Donovan B, Shih AY, Reuter JD, Baker JR., Jr A novel surfactant nanoemulsion with a unique non-irritant topical antimicrobial activity against bacteria enveloped viruses and fungi. Microbiological Research. 2001;156:1–7. doi: 10.1078/0944-5013-00069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Addy M, Moran J. The effect of a cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) detergent foam compared to a conventional toothpaste on plaque and gingivitis. A single blind crossover study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1989;16:87–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1989.tb01619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jenkins S, Addy M, Wade W, Newcombe RG. The magnitude and duration of the effects of some mouthrinse products on salivary bacterial counts. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1994;21:397–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1994.tb00736.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jenkins S, Addy M, Newcombe RG. A comparison of cetylpyridinium chloride, triclosan and chlorhexidine mouthrinse formulations for effects on plaque regrowth. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1994;21:441–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1994.tb00743.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Moran J, Addy M, Jackson R, Newcombe RG. Comparative effects of quaternary ammonium mouth-rinses on 4-day plaque regrowth. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2000;27:37–40. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027001037.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Steinberg D, Moldovan M, Molukandov D. Testing a degradable topical varnish of cetylpyridinium chloride in an experimental dental biofilm model. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2001;48:241–3. doi: 10.1093/jac/48.2.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Botelho MG. The antimicrobial activity of a dentin conditioner combined with antibacterial agents. Operative Dentistry. 2005;30:75–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Arro L, Salenstedt CR. Evaluation of toxicity of some quaternary ammonium compounds. Journal of Biological Standardization. 1973;1:87–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu CD, Savitt ED. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of over-the-counter oral hygiene products for the reduction and control of plaque and gingivitis. Periodontology 2000. 2002;28:91–105. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2002.280105.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Green K, Bowman KA, Elijah RD. Dose–effect response of the rabbit eye to cetylpyridinium chloride. Journal of Toxicology Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology. 1985;4:13–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Neu TR, Lawrence JR. Development and structure of microbial stream biofilms as studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy. FEMS Microb Ecol. 1997;24:11–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stepanovic S, Cirkovic I, Ranin L, Svabic-Vlahovic M. Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surface. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2004;38:428–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01513.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Teixeira PC, Leite GM, Domingues RJ, Paul JS, Gibbs A, Ferreira JP. Antimicrobial effects of a microemulsion and a nanoemulsion on enteric and other pathogens and biofilms. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2007;118:15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baker JR, Wright DC, Hayes MM, Hamouda T, Brisker JM. Methods of inactivating bacteria including bacterial spores. U.S. Patent # 6015832. 2000
  • 22.Myc A, Vanhecke T, Landers JL, Hamouda T, Baker JR. The fungicidal activity of novel nanoemulsion (X8W60PC) against clinically important yeast and filamentous fungi. Mycopathologia. 2001;155:195–201. doi: 10.1023/a:1021129710316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baker JR, Jr, Hamouda T, Shih A, Myc A. Non-toxic antimicrobial compositions and methods of use. US Patent #6,635,676 2003
  • 24.Olsson J, Glantz PO. Effect of pH and counter ions on the zeta-potential of oral streptococci. Archives of Oral Biology. 1977;22:461–466. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(77)90038-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Silverman G, Kleinberg I. Studies on factors affecting the aggregation of the microorganisms in human dental plaque. Archives of Oral Biology. 1967;12:1407–1416. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(67)90178-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sutherland IW. Biosynthesis and composition of gram-negative bacterial extracellular and wall polysaccharides. Annual Review of Microbiology. 1985;39:243–270. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.39.100185.001331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Denyer SP, Stewart GSAB. Mechanisms of action of disinfectants. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 1998;41:261–268. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ioannou CJ, Hanlon GW, Denyer SP. Action of disinfectant quaternary ammonium compounds against Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2007;51:296–306. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00375-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Steinberg D, Bachrach G, Gedalia I, Abu-Ata S, Rozen R. Effects of various antiplaque agents on fructosyltransferase activity in solution and immobilized onto hydroxyapatite. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2002;110:374–379. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21303.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marsh PD. Microbiological aspects of the chemical control of plaque and gingivitis. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1431–8. doi: 10.1177/00220345920710071501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schilling KM, Bowen WH. Glucans synthesized in situ in experimental salivary pellicle function as specific binding sites for Streptococcus mutans. Infection and Immunity. 1992;60:284–295. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.1.284-295.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Al-Adham ISI, Al-Hmoud ND, Khalil E, Kierans M, Collier PJ. Microemulsions are highly effective anti-biofilm agents. Applied Microbiology. 2003;36:97–100. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01266.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moretro T, Langsrud S. biofilm formation and persistence in food processing environments. Biofilms. 2004;1:107–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fowler S, Jones DS. Modified adherence of Candida albicans to human buccal epithelial cells in vitro following treatment with cationic, non-antibiotic antimicrobial agents. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1992;86:193–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jones DS, Schep LJ, Shepherd MG. The effect of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) on the cell surface hydrophobicity and adherence of Candida albicans to human buccal epithelial cells in vitro. Pharmaceutical Research. 1995;12:1896–900. doi: 10.1023/a:1016231620470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES