Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Depress Anxiety. 2011 Aug;28(8):622–631. doi: 10.1002/da.20864

The Epidemiology of Chronic and Non-Chronic Major Depressive Disorder: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions

Jose M Rubio a,b, John C Markowitz a,b,c, Analucía Alegría a,b, Gabriela Pérez-Fuentes a,b, Shang-Min Liu a,b, Keng-Han Lin a,b, Carlos Blanco a,b
PMCID: PMC3212845  NIHMSID: NIHMS316161  PMID: 21796739

Abstract

Background

Burden related to major depressive disorder (MDD) derives mostly from long term occurrence of symptoms. This study aims to examine the prevalence, sociodemographic correlates, patterns of 12-month and lifetime psychiatric co-morbidity, lifetime risk factors, psychosocial functioning, and mental health service utilization of CMDD compared to non-chronic major depressive disorder (NC-MDD).

Methods

Face-to-face interviews were conducted in the 2001–2002 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (n = 43,093).

Results

The 12-month and lifetime prevalence of CMDD within the population meeting criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) was 26.5% and 24.0% respectively. Individuals reporting a chronic course of MDD were socioeconomically and educationally disadvantaged, tended to be older, report loss of spouse or history of divorce, live in rural areas, have public assistance, low self-esteem, worse overall health and more likely to report comorbidities, most importantly dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder, avoidant and dependant personality disorder. Individuals with chronic MDD were more likely to report familial but not childhood onset risk factors for MDD. Those suffering CMDD were more likely to seek and receive mental health care than other forms of MDD, although took longer to start treatment.

Conclusion

Chronic course of MDD is related to still worse socioeconomic conditions, educational achievement, more co-morbidities and family risk factors, although other courses of MDD carried greater risk of unmet treatment.

INTRODUCTION

Longitudinal studies have consistently shown major depressive disorder (MDD) as primarily a chronic disorder [1, 2], with high rates of recurrence [37] and persistent depressive symptoms [57]. About 20% of individuals with MDD suffer from chronic major depressive disorder (CMDD) [813], which is defined as meeting criteria for major depressive episode continually for at least 2 years [14]. MDD is one of the most important causes of disease burden in the general population [15, 16], and it is most through long term duration of symptoms rather than through severity of symptoms [17, 18], so CMDD contributes over and above other clinical presentations of MDD to its global burden. There is a need to understand CMDD better.

Most knowledge about CMDD derives from clinical samples. Compared to non-chronic major depressive disorder (NC-MDD), CMDD has been associated in clinical samples with older age [9, 10], lower socioeconomic status (SES), [9, 11] higher rates of comorbid anxiety disorders [9, 11], worse somatic and psychological well-being [9, 10], longer delays to first treatment-seeking for MDD [8, 12, 19, 20] and greater number of stressful life events [10, 11, 2125]. Despite these data, important questions remain regarding our knowledge of CMDD. For example, although community samples have confirmed that comorbid anxiety disorders increase the risk of CMDD [9, 11], little is known about the role of other Axis I or II disorders. Similarly, although stressful life events [10, 11, 2125], lack of social support [10, 11] and family history of mood disorders [8, 26] have been associated with CMDD, no study has systematically examined the epidemiology of CMDD from the perspective of an integrated etiological model for MDD [27, 28] including the effects of a set of risk factors occurring throughout development. Furthermore, no national study has investigated patterns of mental health care use associated with CMDD.

The present study was designed to address this gap in knowledge by drawing on a large, nationally representative epidemiological study, the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), which included assessments of a broad range of Axis I and II DSM-IV psychiatric disorders with good to excellent psychometric properties. Specifically, we sought to: 1) examine the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of CMDD and; 2) compare patterns of psychiatric comorbidity for 12-month and lifetime CMDD and NC-MDD; 3) compare overall health ratings, family history of various psychiatric disorders, and risk factors for lifetime CMDD and NC-MDD; and 4) estimate their rates of mental health service utilization.

METHODS

Sample

The 2001–2002 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a nationally representative sample of the adult population of the United States conducted by the US Census Bureau under the direction of the National Institute of Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (NIAAA), is described in detail elsewhere [29, 30]. The NESARC target population was the civilian, non-institutionalized population, ages 18 years and older, residing in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The final sample included 43,093 respondents drawn from individual households and group-quarters, such as dormitories and half-way houses. African Americans, Latinos, and young adults (aged 18 to 24 years) were oversampled, with data then adjusted to account for oversampling and respondent and household non-response. The overall survey response rate was 81%. The weighted data were adjusted, using the 2000 Decennial Census, to be representative of the US civilian population on various sociodemographic variables.

Diagnostic assessment

Sociodemographic measures included age, sex, race-ethnicity, nativity, marital status, place of residence, and geographical region. Socioeconomic measures included level of education, family and personal income, and insurance type.

All diagnoses were made according to DSM-IV criteria using the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-DSM-IV Version (AUDADIS-IV), a valid, reliable, fully structured diagnostic interview designed for use by non-clinician professional interviewers [31]. Most Axis I diagnoses included in the AUDADIS-IV fall into three groups: 1) substance use disorders (including alcohol abuse and dependence, drug abuse and dependence, and nicotine dependence); 2) mood disorders (major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, and bipolar disorder); and 3) anxiety disorders (panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, specific phobia, and generalized anxiety disorder [GAD]). Selected personality disorders (PD) (avoidant, dependent, obsessive-compulsive, paranoid, schizoid, histrionic, and antisocial) and conduct disorder were assessed on a lifetime basis only.

Following the DSM-IV, all these disorders were considered “primary” disorders since they excluded mental disorders due to substance use or medical conditions. The diagnosis of MDD also ruled out bereavement. The test-test reliability and validity of AUDADIS-IV measures of DSM-IV disorders has been reported in detail elsewhere [32, 33]. Test-retest reliability was good for MDD (κ=0.65–0.73) and reliability (κ>0.74) and validity were good to excellent for substance use disorders [32, 3441]. Reliability was fair to excellent for other mood and anxiety disorders (κ =0.40–0.60) and personality disorders (κ=0.40–0.67). Clinical reappraisal showed that AUDADIS-IV measures and psychiatrists’ diagnoses agreed well for current MDD (κ=0.49–0.67) and lifetime MDD (κ=0.64–0.68) [32]. Due to concerns about the validity of psychotic diagnoses in general population surveys as well as the length of the interview, possible psychotic disorders were elicited by asking respondents if a doctor or other health professional had ever told them that they had schizophrenia or a psychotic disorder.

CMDD was diagnosed when DSM-IV criteria for MDD were reported as having been continually present for at least two years. Lifetime DSM-IV CMDD was thus defined as having had at least one MDE with these characteristics over the life course without a history of manic, mixed, or hypomanic episodes (i.e., excluding bipolar I and II disorders). This was assessed in the major depression module among respondents meeting MDD criteria who stated that their most recent or longest MDE lasted at least 2 consecutive years. Respondents with lifetime CMDD whose onset of their most recent episode occurred at least two years before the time of the interview, and who reported remaining symptomatic at the time of the assessment, were classified as having 12-month (current) CMDD. All other individuals with MDD were classified as having NC-MDD.

We also included variables measuring any substance use, any alcohol use, non-prescription drug use, any tobacco use in the last 12-months and on a lifetime basis, and use of alcohol and non-prescription medications to relieve depressive symptoms. The reliability of the alcohol consumption and drug use measures has a documented range from good to excellent [42].

The study further included variables considered depressive risk factors that have been extensively studied in MDD. For consistency with previous research[27, 28, 4345], we queried about lifetime risk factors for depression based on the developmental model of MDD proposed by Kendler and colleagues [27, 28]. Following this model, we organized the factors into three sets: 1) familial influences, including family history of depression, substance and alcohol use disorders, and antisocial personality disorder; 2) risk factors with childhood onset including parental loss before age 18, vulnerable family environment (defined as history of separation from a biological parent before age 18), early onset of anxiety disorder (onset before age 18), and conduct disorder; and 3) risk factors manifest into adulthood, including history of separation or divorce, low self-esteem, and number of stressful life events, measured with 12 items from the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (e.g., fired from a job, forced to move).

Psychosocial functioning in the past 12 months was assessed using subscales from the Short Form-12v2 (SF-12), a reliable and valid measure of disability used in population surveys: physical component summary, social functioning scale, role emotional scale, and mental health scale [46]. Each SF-12 disability scale yields a norm-based score with a mean of 50 and standardized range of 0–100. Higher scores indicate less disability. Lifetime assessments included mean age at onset, mean number of MDEs, and median duration of longest depressive episode (either CMDD or NC-MDD).

Mental health treatment

To estimate rates of mental health service utilization, respondents with NC-MDD or CMDD were classified as receiving treatment if they sought help from a counselor, therapist, doctor, or psychologist; from an emergency room; were hospitalized for psychiatric reasons at least one night; or were prescribed medications. Mean age at first mental health service contact was also assessed.

Statistical analyses

The statistical analyses compared two groups, CMDD and NC-MDD. All means, percentages, and odds ratios (ORs) were based on weighted data. Variables with p<0.2 in the univariate analyses were entered into a binary logistic regression to identify independent predictors of CMDD. Because the combined standard error of two means (or percents) is always equal to or less than the sum of the standard errors of those two means, we conservatively consider two non-overlapping confidence intervals (CIs) to differ significantly from one another [47, 48]. We consider significant ORs those whose CI does not include 1. All standard errors and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using SUDAAN [49] to adjust for design characteristics of the survey.

RESULTS

Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates

The 12-month and lifetime prevalence of CMDD in the general population were 1.55% (95% CI: 1.41%-1.71%) and 3.18% (95% CI: 2.96%-3.41%), respectively. For NC-MDD, the 12-month and lifetime prevalence in the general population were 3.23% (95% CI: 3.00%-3.48%) and 10.05% (95% CI: 9.56%-10.56%), respectively. When considering only individuals with current and lifetime MDD, the prevalence of CMDD was 26.45% (95% CI: 24.30%-28.72%) and 24.04% (95% CI: 22.69%-25.44%) respectively.

Compared to NC-MDD, individuals with CMDD tended to be older, less educated, with lower individual and family income. Compared to married individuals, those who were widowed, separated or divorced had increased odds of CMDD, whereas those never married individuals had decreased odds of CMDD. Living in a rural area, and having public insurance compared to having private or no insurance, also increased the risk of CMDD. There were no differences in gender, race/ethnicity, nativity, or region of the country between individuals with CMDD and NC-MDD (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics for lifetime NC-MDD and CMDD

NC-MDD a
N=4256
CMDD
N=1439
CMDD a vs NC-MDD
% 95%CI % 95%CI OR 95%CI
Sex
Male 33.35 31.59 35.17 30.47 27.57 33.53 0.88 0.74 1.03
Female a 66.65 64.83 68.41 69.53 66.47 72.43 1.00 1.00 1.00
Race/Ethnicity
White a 77.94 75.18 80.47 78.72 75.34 81.74 1.00 1.00 1.00
Black 7.39 6.27 8.68 7.76 6.29 9.53 1.04 0.81 1.33
Native Americans 2.81 2.14 3.68 3.91 2.87 5.30 1.38 0.90 2.10
Asian 3.06 2.21 4.21 2.37 1.36 4.08 0.77 0.43 1.36
Hispanic 8.80 7.08 10.89 7.25 5.34 9.77 0.82 0.64 1.05
Nativity
US-born a 90.89 88.76 92.66 91.57 88.70 93.77 1.00 1.00 1.00
Foreign-born 9.11 7.34 11.24 8.43 6.23 11.30 0.92 0.71 1.19
Age
18–29 a 22.53 20.87 24.27 11.21 9.31 13.45 1.00 1.00 1.00
30–44 33.83 32.01 35.70 29.38 26.33 32.63 1.74 1.34 2.26
45–64 35.28 33.35 37.26 43.98 40.79 47.22 2.50 1.97 3.17
>65 8.37 7.42 9.42 15.42 13.35 17.75 3.70 2.73 5.02
Education
< High school 12.31 11.05 13.70 16.82 14.41 19.54 1.55 1.23 1.95
High school 26.21 24.42 28.09 29.06 26.06 32.25 1.26 1.06 1.49
College a 61.48 59.39 63.52 54.13 50.64 57.57 1.00 1.00 1.00
Individual Income
0–19,000 a 48.67 46.42 50.92 54.60 50.95 58.21 1.00 1.00 1.00
20–34,000 23.16 21.41 24.99 20.72 18.05 23.67 0.80 0.65 0.98
35–69,000 21.00 19.20 22.93 18.52 16.01 21.33 0.79 0.64 0.96
>70,000 7.17 6.03 8.52 6.16 4.65 8.12 0.77 0.56 1.05
Family Income
0–19,000a 21.48 19.83 23.22 28.58 25.60 31.76 1.00 1.00 1.00
20–34,000 20.37 18.80 22.03 21.83 19.37 24.50 0.81 0.66 0.99
35–69,000 32.80 31.03 34.62 29.36 26.09 32.87 0.67 0.54 0.83
>70,000 25.36 23.36 27.47 20.22 17.33 23.47 0.60 0.48 0.74
Marital Status
Married a 57.15 55.11 59.17 53.31 50.17 56.44 1.00 1.00 1.00
Widowed/separated/divorced 22.40 21.05 23.82 32.43 29.62 35.37 1.55 1.33 1.81
Never married 20.44 18.77 22.23 14.26 12.31 16.46 0.75 0.61 0.91
Urbanicity
Urban a 79.81 76.31 82.91 75.80 71.25 79.84 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rural 20.19 17.09 23.69 24.20 20.16 28.75 1.26 1.07 1.49
Region
Northeast 18.10 12.87 24.83 19.13 13.57 26.27 1.01 0.83 1.23
Midwest 25.22 19.61 31.79 22.83 17.40 29.36 0.87 0.70 1.07
South 33.22 27.49 39.50 33.52 27.69 39.89 0.97 0.80 1.17
West a 23.46 17.56 30.62 24.52 18.29 32.03 1.00 1.00 1.00
Insurance
Private a 71.73 69.55 73.82 63.23 59.80 66.54 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public 10.59 9.40 11.90 18.72 16.17 21.57 2.01 1.61 2.49
No insurance 17.68 16.01 19.49 18.04 15.62 20.74 1.16 0.93 1.45
a

Reference group.

Risk factors

Significantly higher odds were found for family history of depression, family history of alcohol and drug use disorders, and behavioral problems in a first degree relative. By contrast, none of the risk factors of childhood onset was significantly associated to CMDD. Among risk factors occurring in adulthood, only history of divorce or loss of spouse and having low self-esteem were significantly associated with higher odds of CMDD (Table 2).

Table 2.

Risk factors for MDD in lifetime CMDD and NC-CMDD

NC-MDD a
N=4256
CMDD
N=1439
CMDD a vs NC-MDD
% 95%CI % 95%CI OR 95%CI
Family History Risk Factors
Family history of depression (first grade relative) 61.45 59.47 63.40 65.40 62.05 68.60 1.19 1.02 1.38
Family history of alcohol problems (first grade relative) 47.05 45.15 48.96 54.54 51.34 57.69 1.35 1.17 1.56
Family history of drug problems (first grade relative) 26.81 25.00 28.69 30.89 27.90 34.05 1.22 1.04 1.44
Family history of behavioral problems (first grade relative) 30.40 28.47 32.39 35.26 32.26 38.39 1.25 1.07 1.45
Childhood Risk Factors
Parental loss 9.36 8.43 10.38 10.11 8.43 12.09 1.09 0.87 1.37
Vulnerable family environment b 32.48 30.72 34.30 33.51 30.45 36.71 1.05 0.89 1.23
Early onset of anxiety disorder 50.21 48.18 52.24 49.63 46.04 53.23 0.98 0.83 1.15
Conduct disorder before 15y 1.89 1.37 2.60 1.05 0.59 1.84 0.55 0.28 1.08
Adult Risk Factors
Social support outside the family 48.61 46.61 50.61 48.87 45.53 52.22 1.01 0.87 1.18
History of divorce/loss spouse 38.92 36.85 41.04 50.45 47.21 53.68 1.60 1.37 1.86
Low emotional reactivity d 20.86 19.31 22.50 21.51 18.97 24.29 1.04 0.88 1.23
Low self-esteem e 20.28 18.74 21.90 27.27 24.29 30.47 1.47 1.23 1.77
a

Reference group.

b

History of separation from a biological parent.

c

Assessed by responding positively to the question: “Are there very few people that you’re really close to outside of your immediate family?”

d

Assessed by responding positively to the question: “Do you rarely show much emotion?”

e

Assessed by responding positively to the at least one of the questions: “Do you believe that you’re not as good, as smart, or as attractive as most other people?” or “Are you usually quiet or do you have very little to say when you meet new people because you believe they are better than you are?”

Lifetime and 12-month comorbidity

Approximately nine of ten of respondents with CMDD and seven of ten respondents with NC-CMDD had an additional lifetime Axis I psychiatric disorder. Current Axis I disorders were present in about seven of ten CMDD respondents and six of ten NC-MDD respondents. Lifetime odds for Axis I disorders were three times higher for CMDD respondents compared with the NC-MDD group, although the association was smaller (OR=1.34) when considering 12-month Axis I comorbidity (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3.

Lifetime psychiatric comorbidity, substance use, and overall health in individuals with lifetime NC-MDD and CMDD

NC-MDD a
N=4256
CMDD
N=1439
CMDD a vs NC-MDD
% 95%CI % 95%CI OR 95%CI
Any psychiatric disorder b 75.89 74.20 77.51 89.49 87.45 91.22 2.70 2.18 3.36
Any Axis I disorder b 71.31 69.32 73.21 88.16 86.06 89.98 3.00 2.42 3.71
Any substance use disorder 53.22 51.21 55.23 54.81 51.61 57.97 1.07 0.91 1.24
Alcohol use disorder 40.03 37.96 42.13 41.29 38.06 44.60 1.05 0.90 1.24
Alcohol abuse 19.47 17.98 21.05 19.00 16.36 21.95 0.97 0.80 1.18
Alcohol dependence 20.56 18.93 22.29 22.30 19.43 25.46 1.11 0.92 1.34
Drug use disorder 16.67 15.20 18.25 18.94 16.59 21.53 1.17 0.96 1.42
Drug abuse 11.96 10.65 13.41 11.12 9.08 13.54 0.92 0.70 1.21
Drug dependence 4.71 3.94 5.62 7.82 6.21 9.80 1.72 1.25 2.35
Nicotine dependence 29.07 27.22 30.99 32.94 29.92 36.10 1.20 1.02 1.41
Dysthymia 6.25 5.33 7.32 59.65 56.44 62.77 22.17 17.96 27.36
Any anxiety disorder 39.32 37.24 41.43 47.95 44.73 51.19 1.42 1.22 1.65
Panic disorder 13.50 12.19 14.92 17.59 15.23 20.23 1.37 1.12 1.67
Social anxiety disorder 11.51 10.31 12.84 16.93 14.54 19.63 1.57 1.27 1.94
Specific phobia 19.88 18.39 21.46 22.18 19.30 25.37 1.15 0.95 1.38
Generalized anxiety disorder 12.46 11.16 13.89 22.91 20.37 25.67 2.09 1.72 2.53
Conduct disorder 1.89 1.37 2.60 1.05 0.59 1.84 0.55 0.28 1.08
Pathological gambling 0.62 0.38 1.01 0.78 0.42 1.44 1.26 0.55 2.86
Any psychotic disorder 0.30 0.17 0.52 2.16 1.35 3.42 7.41 3.52 15.60
Any personality disorder 28.57 26.83 30.37 37.69 34.53 40.96 1.51 1.28 1.79
Avoidant 5.10 4.40 5.91 11.07 9.09 13.42 2.31 1.78 3.00
Dependent 0.92 0.62 1.35 2.10 1.38 3.20 2.32 1.34 4.02
Obsessive-Compulsive 16.04 14.60 17.58 17.53 14.86 20.57 1.11 0.90 1.38
Paranoid 9.20 8.18 10.32 12.40 10.40 14.73 1.40 1.10 1.77
Schizoid 6.52 5.50 7.71 10.39 8.42 12.74 1.66 1.22 2.27
Histrionic 3.38 2.68 4.25 4.34 3.08 6.08 1.30 0.89 1.89
Antisocial 5.52 4.72 6.45 8.84 7.21 10.80 1.66 1.26 2.18
Any substance usec 92.44 91.25 93.48 91.78 89.81 93.40 0.91 0.69 1.21
Any tobacco use 53.24 51.08 55.39 59.03 55.60 62.38 1.27 1.08 1.48
Any alcohol use 90.04 88.70 91.23 87.14 84.57 89.34 0.75 0.59 0.96
Any drug use 34.54 32.45 36.69 37.53 34.39 40.78 1.14 0.96 1.35
Use of non-prescribed substances to relieve depressive symptoms
Alcohol use 16.77 15..21 18.46 21.22 18.79 23.86 1.34 1.09 1.64
Use of non-prescribed medication 4.23 3.49 5.11 8.94 7.07 11.24 2.22 1.60 3.10
Overall health (good to excellent) 83.31 81.67 84.83 67.99 64.82 71.01 0.43 0.36 0.51
a

Reference group.

b

Any psychiatric disorder and any Axis I disorder does not include either MDD or CMDD.

c

Any substance use includes any tobacco use, any alcohol use, and any drug use.

Table 4.

Past 12-months psychiatric comorbidity, substance use and overall health in individuals with past 12-months NC-MDD and CMDD

NC-MDD a
N=1406
CMDD
N=697
CMDD a vs NC-MDD
% 95%CI % 95%CI OR 95%CI
Any psychiatric disorder b 59.82 56.32 63.21 66.59 61.83 71.03 1.34 1.05 1.71
Any Axis I disorder b 35.82 32.74 39.03 32.31 27.84 37.11 0.86 0.66 1.11
Any substance use disorder 14.85 12.67 17.34 13.09 9.90 17.11 0.86 0.59 1.26
Alcohol use disorder 5.85 4.50 7.56 5.85 3.99 8.50 1.00 0.60 1.67
Alcohol abuse 9.00 7.18 11.24 7.24 4.75 10.89 0.79 0.47 1.31
Alcohol dependence 4.27 3.20 5.67 5.04 3.09 8.12 1.19 0.64 2.21
Drug use disorder 2.70 1.90 3.82 3.38 1.86 6.06 1.26 0.61 2.61
Drug abuse 1.79 1.15 2.78 3.68 1.97 6.78 2.10 0.93 4.74
Drug dependence 26.59 23.77 29.60 24.84 20.77 29.41 0.91 0.69 1.21
Nicotine dependence 5.90 4.37 7.93 30.77 26.55 35.33 7.08 4.86 10.33
Dysthymia 35.06 32.10 38.15 38.10 33.06 43.42 1.14 0.88 1.48
Any anxiety disorder 10.57 8.67 12.83 10.85 8.10 14.39 1.03 0.69 1.53
Panic disorder 9.42 7.65 11.54 10.51 7.49 14.55 1.13 0.72 1.76
Social anxiety disorder 17.16 14.82 19.79 18.15 14.49 22.49 1.07 0.79 1.44
Specific phobia 11.25 9.39 13.43 17.42 13.70 21.88 1.66 1.15 2.40
Generalized anxiety disorder 1.26 0.78 2.04 2.01 1.01 3.98 1.60 0.67 3.81
Conduct disorder 0.09 0.02 0.35 0.19 0.05 0.76 2.02 0.29 14.21
Pathological gambling 0.46 0.21 1.01 2.91 1.62 5.16 6.46 2.45 17.04
Any substance usec 79.86 76.99 82.46 77.36 72.84 81.31 0.86 0.65 1.15
Any tobacco use 40.38 37.01 43.84 39.42 34.92 44.11 0.96 0.76 1.21
Any alcohol use 71.78 68.51 74.82 64.63 59.53 69.42 0.72 0.55 0.93
Any drug use 13.17 11.05 15.63 10.27 7.47 13.97 0.75 0.51 1.12
Use of non-prescribed substances to relieve depressive symptoms
Alcohol use 12.02 10.05 14.31 8.73 6.33 11.94 0.70 0.47 1.05
Use of non-prescribed medication 1.95 1.28 2.95 1.75 1.02 2.97 0.89 0.44 1.83
SF-12 mean 95%CI mean 95%CI T-score p-value
physical component summary 50.88 50.05 51.70 47.25 46.01 48.50 −5.14 <0.0001
social function scale 44.94 44.11 45.76 43.87 42.44 45.30 −1.31 0.1947
role emotional scale 44.70 43.83 45.57 41.89 40.49 43.30 −3.50 0.0009
mental health scale 41.84 41.05 42.63 42.00 40.77 43.24 0.22 0.8257
a

Reference group.

b

Any psychiatric disorder and any Axis I disorder does not include either MDD or CMDD.

c

Any substance use includes any tobacco use, any alcohol use, and any drug use.

Not surprisingly, the odds of dysthymic disorder were more than twenty-fold for lifetime, and seven-fold for current CMDD. The odds for all lifetime anxiety disorders, except specific phobia, were higher in the CMDD group. However, among 12-month anxiety disorders, only GAD was significantly more common among individuals with CMDD than among those with NC-MDD. Lifetime psychotic disorder was also more common in individuals with lifetime and current CMDD group than in the NC-MDD group. Among substance use disorders, only lifetime drug dependence and nicotine dependence were significantly more likely in the CMDD group.

Personality disorders were more likely to be present among individuals with CMDD (Table 3). Avoidant and dependent personality disorders were more than twice as likely in the CMDD group, and paranoid, schizoid and antisocial PD were also more likely to be present.

Individuals with CMDD had higher prevalence of lifetime tobacco use but lower lifetime and 12-month alcohol use. However, lifetime use of alcohol and non-prescribed substances to relieve symptoms was more common among CMDD respondents.

Past 12-month psychosocial functioning, lifetime course and mental health treatment

Individuals meeting 12-month criteria for CMDD had significantly lower scores on the physical component summary and role emotional SF-12 subscales than those with NC-MDD, indicating greater physical and emotional disability. Their odds of rating overall health as good or excellent were significantly lower (Tables 3 and 4).

Compared to respondents with NC-MDD, those with CMDD had significantly higher number of major depressive episodes, longer delays to first treatment, and greater likelihood of having received all treatment modalities (Table 5).

Table 5.

Lifetime course and treatment-seeking patterns for NC-MDD and CMDD

NC-MDD a
N=4256
CMDD
N=1439
CMDD a vs NC-MDD CMDD a vs NC-MDD
% 95%CI % 95%CI OR 95%CI OR b 95%CI
Sought treatment 56.93 55.00 58.85 72.58 69.34 75.59 2.00 1.68 2.39 2.07 1.72 2.49
Treated as outpatient 50.83 48.90 52.77 64.78 61.24 68.15 1.78 1.50 2.10 1.92 1.60 2.30
Treated as inpatient (hospitalized) 7.58 6.64 8.65 16.03 14.06 18.22 2.33 1.89 2.86 2.12 1.69 2.66
Emergency room admittance 6.61 5.72 7.64 12.48 10.54 14.72 2.01 1.59 2.55 1.91 1.47 2.47
Received pharmacological treatment 39.08 37.07 41.12 59.15 55.70 62.51 2.26 1.93 2.64 2.17 1.84 2.56
mean 95%CI mean 95%CI T-score p-value
Age at onset (mean),y 30.14 29.62 30.66 31.40 30.36 32.44 2.20 0.0314
Mean number of episodes of MDD 4.13 3.68 4.58 6.86 5.72 8.00 4.56 <0.0001
Age at first treatment(mean) 32.77 32.11 33.44 35.44 34.15 36.74 3.79 0.0003
Duration of longest episode (mean),y 0.39 0.38 0.41 6.76 6.24 7.28 24.41 <0.0001
a

Reference group.

b

Odds Ratio adjusted by age, sex, race, nativity, marital status, urbanicity, family and individual income, region, and insurance.

Logistic regression model

The logistic regression model identified as independent predictors the following variables: age (compared with individuals between 18 and 29 years old, those between 30 and 44 had OR=1.45, 95% CI=1.09–1.92; between 45 and 64 OR=2.13, 95% CI=1.61–2.86; and older than 65 OR=4.00, 95% CI=2.70–5.88), comorbid dysthymia (OR=20.00, 95% CI=16.66–25.00) and comorbid antisocial personality disorder (OR=1.61, 95% Ci=1.05–2.50), use of pharmacological treatment (OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.19–1.72) and overall health (OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.41–0.80). This model had 90.96% (S.E=0.24) accuracy of correctly identifying individuals with CMDD.

DISCUSSION

In a large, nationally representative sample of US adults, one quarter of all individuals meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD met criteria for CMDD in the last 12 months and lifetime respectively. Compared with individuals with NC-MDD, individuals with CMDD had lower SES, tended to be older, with history of divorce or loss of spouse, had higher prevalence of family history and adulthood onset risk factors for MDD, greater Axis I and II comorbidity, and greater reported physical and emotional disability. They also had higher lifetime rates of treatment-seeking, but longer delays before first treatment contact for MDD. After adjusting for multiple observations, older age, comorbid dysthymia and antisocial personality disorder, worse overall health and use of pharmacological treatment for depression were associated with CMDD.

Our study confirms that CMDD accounts for approximately one every four cases of MDD. Evidence on the prevalence of CMDD is quite consistent across studies, ranging from 21.2% to 29.0% in previous clinical samples [912] and from 20.0% to 23.0% in community samples [8, 13].

In accord with most [9, 11, 50, 51] but not all previous studies [8], we found an inverse relationship between risk of CMDD and several indicators of socioeconomic status, including educational attainment and family income. Several non-exclusive underlying mechanisms could explain this finding. Low SES may act as a chronic stressor and constitute a risk factor for a chronic course of MDD, as suggested by social causation theories [52]. Alternatively, healthy individuals may tend to maintain higher SES level along generations whereas depressed individuals tend to drift down from high SES or fail to rise from low SES, as social selection theories have suggested [52]. Our findings of more highly prevalent family history of depression among individuals with CMDD than NC-MDD are consistent with these theories. A third possibility is that chronic depressive symptoms may impede educational and social achievements from young age at a subsyndromal level even before they become clinical evident. Subsyndromal depressive symptoms are frequently prodromal and residual to major depressive episodes [6], and predict worse outcome of MDD, including longer duration, in both clinical [5] and community studies [6, 53].

Consistent with prior findings in clinical [11] and community samples [8, 51], our study found that individuals who never married carried a lower risk for CMDD, whereas those who once married but had separated, divorced or widowed had higher risk. By contrast, low social support outside the immediate family was not associated with CMDD. Losing a spouse appears to have much greater negative impact on chronicity than lack of a romantic partner or loss of less meaningful relationships. Alternatively, chronic depressive symptoms may have a more disruptive effect on marital relationships than on other relationships that are less close or involve less frequent contact [54].

Whereas all of the family history risk factors included in our analysis were significantly associated with developing CMDD, none of the childhood onset risk factors was significantly associated. It appears that childhood onset factors increase the risk of having MDD, whereas genetic factors [11, 21, 25, 26] and recent environmental stressors may have additional influence on the chronicity of the disorder.

Individuals with CMDD showed greater lifetime and 12 month Axis I and II comorbidity, consistent with prior clinical [911] and community studies [8, 55]. MDD and anxiety disorders may constitute alternative or overlapping expressions of a single underlying disorder or liability dimension [2], as epidemiological and twin studies suggest [5660]. Chronicity of MDD may indicate a more severe form of this underlying disorder, and subsequent higher likelihood of more diverse expression, including comorbid disorders. Consistent with this interpretation, CMDD is generally associated with increased treatment resistance [61], greater interference with daily activities [62], greater suicidality [63], higher hospitalization rates [62, 64], and higher prevalence of risk factors [8, 22, 26]. Dependent and avoidant personality disorders were also related to CMDD. These findings accord with previous reports of increased persistence of depressive symptoms in patients scoring high in neuroticism [6567], and with the fading of these Axis II disorders with sustained recovery from MDD [68]. Neuroticism may be a risk factor for persistence of depressive symptoms [65] or represent an epiphenomenon of chronic depression [66].

Our study found no significant differences for age of onset, yet individuals with CMDD had longer delays in first treatment contact. These findings accord with prior research documenting the association between later onset of treatment and persistence of depressive symptoms [8, 12, 19, 20].

Delayed treatment onset among individuals with CMDD may be due to initial attributions of symptoms to personality characteristics that cannot be changed [69] and contribute to its chronicity [70]. The fact that the CMDD group accounted for a large proportion of individuals older than 65 may contribute to this treatment delay, since older cohorts showed delays in treatment seeking behavior for MDD compared to younger cohorts [71]. Recent changes related to destigmatization [72] or facilitation of treatment opportunities [73] may account for earlier treatment seeking behavior in younger generations compared with elderly, that might be more reluctant to start treatment. Other reports have suggested that longer duration of untreated illness could account for a worse outcome of MDD [74]. The fact that individuals with CMDD were more likely to seek treatment and to use more mental health services may be related to its greater personal burden, or to a more accurate interpretation of their symptoms that may eventually lead them to seek treatment [45, 75, 76], as well as to increased use of services derived from treatment resistance [77]. Symptoms of comorbid disorders may also serve as a port of entry for the treatment of their CMDD. Nevertheless, over a quarter of individuals with MDD and almost half of those with NC-MDD had never sought treatment. Despite progress in the treatment of MDD [78], CMDD remains undertreated, and treatment adequacy has not significantly increased over the past decade [79], suggesting an area with great opportunities for quality improvement.

Our study has several limitations. First, information was based on interviewed self-report, which raises the possibility of misclassification, recall bias, and increased error variance. Second, because the NESARC sample only included civilian households and group quarter populations 18 years and older, information was unavailable on adolescents and incarcerated individuals. Third, the cross-sectional design precludes identifying directionality between the variables associated to the CMDD and NC-MDD groups.

Despite these limitations, the NESARC constitutes the only nationally representative survey to date to compare in detail the characteristics of CMDD and NC-MDD. Our findings document the greater severity associated with the chronic course of MDD, specially in terms of socioeconomic difficulties and comorbidity burden, and identify some of the risk factors and associated features with it. These findings may offer clues for new directions to address the tremendous burden imposed by MDD, and how to help those more severely affected by it.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The NESARC was funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) with supplemental support from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). This study is supported by NIH grants DA019606, DA020783, DA023200 and MH076051 (Dr. Blanco), a grant from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (Dr. Blanco), and the New York State Psychiatric Institute (Drs. Blanco and Markowitz).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Judd L. The clinical course of unipolar major depressive disorders. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 1997;54:989–991. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830230015002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Merikangas K, Zhang H, Avenevoli S, Acharyya S, Neuenschwander M, Angst J. Longitudinal trajectories of depression and anxiety in a prospective community study: The Zurich Cohort Study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2003;60:993–1000. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lehmann H, Fenton F, Deutsch M, Feldman S, Engelsmann F. An 11 year follow up study of 110 depressed patients. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1988;78:57–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1988.tb06301.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kiloh L, Andrews G, Neilson M. The long-term outcome of depressive illness. Br. J. Psychiatry. 1988;153:752–757. doi: 10.1192/bjp.153.6.752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Judd L, Akiskal H, Maser J, Zeller P, Endicott J, Coryell W, Paulus M, Kunovac J, Leon A, Mueller T. A prospective 12-year study of subsyndromal and syndromal depressive symptoms in unipolar major depressive disorders. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 1998;55:694–700. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.8.694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Judd L, Akiskal H, Paulus M. The role and clinical significance of subsyndromal depressive symptoms (SSD) in unipolar major depressive disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 1997;45:5–18. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00055-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Judd L, Paulus M, Schettler P, Akiskal H, Endicott J, Leon A, Maser J, Mueller T, Solomon D, Keller M. Does incomplete recovery from first lifetime major depressive episode herald a chronic course of illness? Am. J. Psychiatry. 2000;157:1501–1504. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.9.1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Angst J, Gamma A, Rössler W, Ajdacic V, Klein D. Long-term depression versus episodic major depression: Results from the prospective Zurich study of a community sample. J. Affect. Disord. 2009;115:112–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gilmer W, Trivedi M, Rush A, Wisniewski S, Luther J, Howland R, Yohanna D, Khan A, Alpert J. Factors associated with chronic depressive episodes: A preliminary report from the STAR D project. Acta. Psychiatr.Scand. 2005;112:425–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00633.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hays J, Krishnan K, George L, Pieper C, Flint E, Blazer D. Psychosocial and physical correlates of chronic depression. Psychiatry Res. 1997;72:149–159. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(97)00105-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pettit J, Lewinsohn P, Roberts R, Seeley J, Monteith L. The long-term course of depression: Development of an empirical index and identification of early adult outcomes. Psychol. Med. 2009;39:403–412. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rush A, Laux G, Giles D, Jarrett R, Weissenburger J, Feldman-Koffler F, Stone L. Clinical characteristics of outpatients with chronic major depression. J. Affect. Dis. 1995;34:25–32. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(94)00101-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Spijker J, De Graaf R, Bijl R, Beekman A, Ormel J, Nolen W. Duration of major depressive episodes in the general population: Results from The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS) Br. J. Psychiatry. 2002;181:208–213. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.3.208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.American Psychiatric Association ed. Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) Washington D.C.: APA; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349:1436–1442. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07495-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.WorldHealthOrganization. The World Health Report 2001: Mental Health: New understanding, new hope. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Balkrishnan R, Joish VN, Yang T, Jayawant SS, Mullins CD. The economic burden associated with SSRI treatment failure in a managed care population. J. Med. Econ. 2008;11:601–610. doi: 10.3111/13696990802522339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fostick L, Silberman A, Beckman M, Spivak B, Amital D. The economic impact of depression: Resistance or severity? Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;20:671–675. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mueller T, Keller M, Leon A, Solomon D, Shea M, Coryell W, Endicott J. Recovery after 5 years of unremitting major depressive disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 1996;53:794–799. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830090040006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Scott J. Chronic depression. Br. J. Psychiatry. 1988;153:287–297. doi: 10.1192/bjp.153.3.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nakanishi T, Isobe F, Ogawa Y. Chronic depression of monopolar, endogenous type: With special reference to the premorbid personality, “Typus Melancholicus”. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 1993;47:495–504. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1993.tb01791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Friis R, Wittchen H, Pfister H, Lieb R. Life events and changes in the course of depression in young adults. Eur. Psychiatry. 2002;17:241–253. doi: 10.1016/s0924-9338(02)00682-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wittchen H. Chronic difficulties and life events in the long-term course of affective and anxiety disorders: Results from the Munich follow-up study. In: Angermeier M, editor. From social class to social stress: New developments in psychiatric epidemiology. Secaucus, NJ: Springer-Verlag; 1987. pp. 176–196. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zlotnick C, Warshaw M, Shea M, Keller M. Trauma and chronic depression among patients with anxiety disorders. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1997;65:333–336. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.2.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Scott J, Barker W, Eccleston D. The Newcastle Chronic Depression Study. Patient characteristics and factors associated with chronicity. Br. J. Psychiatry. 1988;152:28–33. doi: 10.1192/bjp.152.1.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Klein D, Shankman S, Lewinsohn P, Rohde P, Seeley J. Family study of chronic depression in a community sample of young adults. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2004;161:646–653. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kendler K, Gardner C, Prescott C. Toward a comprehensive developmental model for major depression in women. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2002;159:1133–1145. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.7.1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Prescott CA. Toward a comprehensive developmental model for major depression in men. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2006a;163:115–124. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Grant BF, Hasin DS, Chou SP, Stinson FS, Dawson DA. Nicotine dependence and psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:1107–1115. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.11.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Grant BF, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, Chou SP, Dufour MC, Compton W, Pickering RP, Kaplan K. Prevalence and co-occurrence of substance use disorders and independent mood and anxiety disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2004;61:807–816. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.8.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Grant BF, Dawson DA, Hasin DS. The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-DSM-IV Version (AUDADIS-IV) Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grant BF, Dawson DA, Stinson FS, Chou PS, Kay W, Pickering RT. The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV): Reliability of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, family history of depression and psychiatric diagnostic modules in a general population sample. Drug Alcohol. Depend. 2003;71:7–16. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(03)00070-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ruan WJ, Goldstein RB, Chou SP, Smith SM, Saha TD, Pickering RP, Dawson DA, Huang B, Stinson FS, Grant BF. The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV): Reliability of new psychiatric diagnostic modules and risk factors in a general population sample. Drug Alcohol. Depend. 2008;92:27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Canino GJ, Bravo M, Ramírez R, Febo V, Fernández R, Hasin DS. The Spanish Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (AUDADIS): Reliability and concordance with clinical diagnoses in a Hispanic population. J. Stud. Alcohol. 1999;60:790–799. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1999.60.790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cottler LB, Grant BF, Blaine J, Mavreas V, Pull C, Hasin D, Compton WM, Rubio-Stipec M, Mager D. Concordance of DSM-IV alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997;47:195–205. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00090-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hasin D, Paykin A. Alcohol dependence and abuse diagnoses: Concurrent validity in a nationally representative sample. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 1999;23:144–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hasin DS, Schuckit MA, Martin CS, Grant BF, Bucholz KK, Helzer JE. The validity of DSM-IV alcohol dependence: What do we know and what do we need to know? Alcohol. Clin.Exp.Res. 2003;27:244–252. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000060878.61384.ED. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nelson CB, Rehm J, Ustun TB, Grant B, Chatterji S. Factor structures for DSM-IV substance disorder criteria endorsed by alcohol, cannabis, cocaine and opiate users: results from the WHO reliability and validity study. Addiction. 1999;94:843–855. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9468438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pull CB, Saunders JB, Mavreas V, Cottler LB, Grant BF, Hasin DS, Blaine J, Mager D, Ustun BT. Concordance between ICD-10 alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by the AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN: results of a cross-national study. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 1997;47:207–216. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00091-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ustun B, Compton W, Mager D, Babor T, Baiyewu O, Chatterji S, Cottler L, Gogus A, Mavreas V, Peters L, Pull C, Saunders J, Smeets R, Stipec MR, Vrasti R, Hasin D, Room R, Van den Brink W, Regier D, Blaine J, Grant BF, Sartorius N. WHO Study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments: Overview of methods and results. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 1997;47:161–169. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00087-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vrasti R, Grant BF, Chatterji S, Ustun BT, Mager D, Olteanu I, Badoi M. Reliability of the romanian version of the alcohol module of the WHO Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities: Interview Schedule -Alcohol/Drug-Revised. Eur. Addict. Res. 1998;4:144–149. doi: 10.1159/000018947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hasin DS, Stinson FS, Ogburn E, Grant BF. Prevalence, correlates, disability and comorbidity of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:830–842. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.7.830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kendler KS, Gatz M, Gardner CO, Pedersen NL. A Swedish national twin study of lifetime major depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:109–114. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Alegria A, Hasin D, Nunes E, Liu S, Davies C, Grant B, Blanco C. Comorbidity of generalized anxiety disorder and substance use disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 71:1187–1195. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05328gry. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Blanco C, Okuda M, Markowitz J, Liu S, Grant B, Hasin D. The epidemiology of chronic major depressive disorder and dysthymic disorder: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 71:1645–1656. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05663gry. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ware JE, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B. How to score Version 2 of the SF-12 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metrics; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & sons, Inc; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Agresti A, Min Y. Unconditional small-sample confidence intervals for the odds ratio. Biostatistics. 2002;3:379–386. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/3.3.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Research Triangle Institute. Software for Survey Data Analysis (SUDAAN), Version 9.0. Cary NC: Research Triangle Institute Research Triangle Park; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bracke P. The three-year persistence of depressive symptoms in men and women. Soc. Sci. & Med. 2000;51:51–64. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00432-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Eaton W, Shao H, Nestadt G, Lee B, Bienvenu O, Zandi P. Population-based study of first onset and chronicity in major depressive disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2008;65:513–520. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.5.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dohrenwend BP, Levav I, Shrout PE, Schwartz S, Naveh G, Link BG, Skodol AE, Stueve A. Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: The causation-selection issue. Science. 1992;255:946–952. doi: 10.1126/science.1546291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jonsson U, Bohman H, von Knorring L, Olsson G, Paaren A, von Knorring A. Mental health outcome of long-term and episodic adolescent depression: 15-year follow-up of a community sample. J. Affect. Disord. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bulloch AG, Williams JV, Lavorato DH, Patten SB. The relationship between major depression and marital disruption is bidirectional. Depress. Anxiety. 2009;26:1172–1177. doi: 10.1002/da.20618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Skodol AE, Grilo CM, Keyes KM, Geier T, Grant BF, Hasin DS. Relationship of personality disorders to the course of major depressive disorder in a nationally representative sample. Am. J. Psychiatry. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10050695. appi.ajp.2010.10050695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Vollebergh WAM, Iedema J, Bijl RV, de Graaf R, Smit F, Ormel J. The structure and stability of common mental disorders: The NEMESIS Study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2001;58:597–603. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.6.597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Krueger RF. The structure of common mental disorders. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 1999;56:921–926. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.10.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kendler K. Major depression and generalized anxiety disorder: Same genes, (partly) different environments--revisited. Focus. 2004;2:416–425. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kendler K, Gardner C, Gatz M, Pedersen N. The sources of co-morbidity between major depression and generalized anxiety disorder in a Swedish national twin sample. Psychol. Med. 2007;37:453–462. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706009135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kendler KS, Prescott CA, Myers J, Neale MC. The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for common psychiatric and substance use disorders in men and women. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2003;60:929–937. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Coryell W, Endicott J, Andreasen N, Keller M, Clayton P, Hirschfeld R, Scheftner W, Winokur G. Depression and panic attacks: The significance of overlap as reflected in follow-up and family study data. Am. J. Psychiatry. 1988;145:293–300. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.3.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kessler R, Nelson C, McGonagle K, Liu J, Swartz M, Blazer D. Comorbidity of DSM-III-R major depressive disorder in the general population: Results from the US National Comorbidity Survey. Br. J. Psychiatry. Supplement. 1996;173:648–654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bronisch T, Wittchen H. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts: Comorbidity with depression, anxiety disorders, and substance abuse disorder. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosc. 1994;244:93–98. doi: 10.1007/BF02193525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Melartin T, Rytsala H, Leskela U, Lestela-Mielonen P, Sokero T, Isometsa E. Current comorbidity of psychiatric disorders among DSM-IV major depressive disorder patients in psychiatric care in the Vantaa Depression Study. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2002;63:126–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Duggan CF, Lee AS, Murray RM. Does personality predict long-term outcome in depression? Br. J. Psychiatry. 1990;157:19–24. doi: 10.1192/bjp.157.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hirschfeld R, Klerman G, Andreasen N, Clayton P, Keller M. Psycho-social predictors of chronicity in depressed patients. Br. J. Psychiatry. 1986;148:648–654. doi: 10.1192/bjp.148.6.648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Weissman MM, Prusoff BA, Klerman GL. Personality and the prediction of long-term outcome of depression. Am. J. Psychiatry. 1978;135:797–800. doi: 10.1176/ajp.135.7.797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cyranowski J, Frank E, Winter E, Rucci P, Novick D, Pilkonis P, Fagiolini A, Swartz H, Houck P, Kupfer D. Personality pathology and outcome in recurrently depressed women over 2 years of maintenance interpersonal psychotherapy. Psychol. Med. 2004;34:659–669. doi: 10.1017/S0033291703001661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Markowitz J. Interpersonal psychotherapy for dysthymic disorder. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Pub. Inc; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Okuda A, Suzuki T, Kishi T, Yamanouchi Y, Umeda K, Haitoh H, Hashimoto S, Ozaki N, Iwata N. Duration of untreated illness and antidepressant fluvoxamine response in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 64:268–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wang PS, Berglund P, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, Kessler RC. Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2005;62:603–613. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sturm R. Tracking changes in behavioral health services: How have carve-outs changed care? J. Behav. Health Serv. Res. 1999;26:360–371. doi: 10.1007/BF02287297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rosenthal MB, Berndt ER, Donohue JM, Frank RG, Epstein AM. Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:498–505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Altamura AC, Dell'Osso B, Vismara S, Mundo E. May duration of untreated illness influence the long-term course of major depressive disorder? Eur. Psychiatry. 2008;23:92–96. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Klein D, Schwartz J, Rose S, Leader J. Five-year course and outcome of dysthymic disorder: A prospective, naturalistic follow-up study. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2000;157:931–939. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.6.931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.McFarland B, Klein D. Mental health service use by patients with dysthymic disorder: Treatment use and dropout in a 7 1/2-year naturalistic follow-up study. Compr. Psychiatry. 2005;46:246–253. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Rush AJ, Warden D, Wisniewski SR, Fava M, Trivedi MH, Gaynes BN, Nierenberg AA. STARD: Revising Conventional Wisdom. CNS drugs. 2009;23:627–647. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200923080-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Olfson M, Marcus S, Druss B, Elinson L, Tanielian T, Pincus H. National trends in the outpatient treatment of depression. JAMA. 2002;287:203–209. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kocsis JH, Gelenberg AJ, Rothbaum B, Klein DN, Trivedi MH, Manber R, Keller MB, Howland R, Thase ME. Chronic forms of major depression are still undertreated in the 21st century: Systematic assessment of 801 patients presenting for treatment. J. Affect. Disord. 2008;110:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES