Abstract
The protozoan oyster parasite Perkinsus marinus can be cultured in vitro in a variety of media; however, this has been associated with a rapid attenuation of infectivity. Supplementation of defined media with products of P. marinus-susceptible (Crassostrea virginica) and -tolerant (Crassostrea gigas, Crassostrea ariakensis) oysters alters proliferation and protease expression profiles and induces differentiation into morphological forms typically seen in vivo. It was not known if attenuation could be reversed by host extract supplementation. To investigate correlations among these changes as well as their association with infectivity, the effects of medium supplementation with tissue homogenates from both susceptible and tolerant oyster species were examined. The supplements markedly altered both cell size and proliferation, regardless of species; however, upregulation of low-molecular-weight protease expression was most prominent with susceptible oysters extracts. Increased infectivity occurred with the use of oyster product-supplemented media, but it was not consistently associated with changes in cell size, cell morphology, or protease secretion and was not related to the susceptibility of the oyster species used as the supplement source.
Perkinsus marinus is a protozoan parasite of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica. Mortalities caused by this parasite typically occur in the second summer of infection and have been responsible for much of the recent decline in the oyster fishery along the eastern seaboard of the United States (3, 15). The molecular mechanisms of parasite infectivity, virulence, and interaction with the host defense system are largely unknown. The development of media formulations allowing axenic culture of P. marinus has provided new opportunities to assess the effects of host components on parasite growth, physiology, and infectivity. There are several media formulations for in vitro P. marinus culture that employ commercial base formulations (e.g., Dulbecco modified Eagle's medium with Ham's F-12 nutrient mixture) supplemented with such constituents as cod liver oil, bovine serum albumin, yeastolate, or fetal bovine serum (FBS) or its α-fetoprotein constituent, fetuin (11, 18, 19, 21, 23, 26). There is also a chemically defined, protein-free medium (ODRP-3 [25]) which has proven to be of particular value for the production of antibodies against P. marinus extracellular products (12).
The in vivo P. marinus life cycle begins with a small, immature trophozoite that enlarges over time into a “signet ring” form, so named for its large vacuole and offset nucleus. This mature trophozoite may then undergo palintomic fission, in which 4 to 64 or more immature trophozoites are formed within, then exit from, the parental cell, or tomont, wall (35). P. marinus can also form motile zoospores, again by palintomic fission, with exit of the zoospores through a discharge tube and pore structure formed on the wall of the enlarged parental trophozoite, the zoosporangium (35). During in vitro culture in ODRP-3 medium, cellular proliferation is apparently solely by binary fission, and no zoosporulation is seen. In an effort to more closely simulate, in vitro, the milieu to which P. marinus is exposed in vivo, oyster tissue homogenate and plasma from P. marinus-susceptible and -tolerant oyster species have been employed as culture supplements (20, 21, 29). Compared with growth in unsupplemented ODRP-3, P. marinus cells grown in the presence of plasma supplements from Crassostrea gigas, Crassostrea ariakensis, or infected C. virginica oysters show reduced in vitro proliferation (20). Uninfected C. virginica plasma supplementation, however, results in only minimal inhibition of proliferation (20, 29). Oyster tissue homogenate-supplemented medium produces marked changes in cell proliferation, morphology, and differentiation, including enlargement of trophozoites and induction of tomont stages, which are rarely seen in unsupplemented ODRP-3 medium but are commonly observed during infection (29).
Several studies have implicated proteases as contributing factors in P. marinus virulence (17, 28, 32, 33). The extracellular products of P. marinus cells grown in ODRP-3 contain only high-molecular-mass (>50-kDa) proteases (29). However, when C. virginica plasma or homogenate is used as a media supplement, there is significant alteration in P. marinus protease expression patterns, including a simultaneous downregulation of high-molecular-mass proteases and upregulation of low-molecular-mass (<50-kDa) proteases. These changes are not seen when cells are exposed to homogenates from C. gigas and C. ariakensis oysters (29), both of which have been reported to be more tolerant of P. marinus infection than is C. virginica (2, 7, 8, 30).
It is not clear if there is an association between the observed changes in cellular morphology and the shifts in the secreted protease profiles in supplemented cultures, or whether either is associated with parasite infectivity. In order to better understand these relationships, protease production, in vitro cell size and morphology, and infectivity were assessed under various conditions. Observations were made of variations in these factors among clonal P. marinus isolates, and then one isolate was selected for investigation of alterations in the presence of various host-derived media supplements. A detailed observation of the effects of tissue-based supplements derived from susceptible and tolerant oysters was then performed, and a selected dosage level was used to investigate infectivity using a variety of oyster populations and species.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals.
Experimental oysters were maintained in 1-μm-filtered York River (Va.) water and fed commercially produced algae (Reed Mariculture, San Jose, Calif.). Water changes were performed twice weekly, and all effluent water was chlorinated prior to release. P. marinus-free C. virginica oysters from Maine (C. virginica ME; Pemaquid Oyster Company, Waldoboro, Maine) were initially employed, but the occurrence of P. marinus infections in those oysters over the course of this study necessitated the importation of disease-free C. virginica oysters from Washington state (C. virginica WA; Taylor Shellfish Farms, Shelton, Wash.). C. gigas oysters were purchased from Taylor Shellfish Farms. C. virginica oysters originally from populations in Louisiana (C. virginica LA), Tangier Sound (C. virginica TG) in the Chesapeake Bay (Va.), and the CROSBreed program (C. virginica XB; selectively bred for P. marinus resistance) were all gathered from a single deployment site in the Yeocomico River, a tributary of the Potomac River (Va.) near its entrance to the Chesapeake Bay. C. ariakensis oysters were provided by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science oyster hatchery. A subsample of both the C. virginica ME and C. virginica WA oysters used in infection trials was confirmed to be P. marinus-free by body burden analysis (see below).
Infection trials and analysis of P. marinus body burden.
Oysters were infected by injection of parasites into the mantle cavity through a small hole in the shell made with a lapidary saw. Each oyster was injected with 106 parasite cells suspended in 100 μl of artificial seawater (20 ppt; Forty Fathoms Marine Mix; Marine Enterprises International, Baltimore, Md.) on days 1, 3, and 5, and a sham group was injected with artificial seawater. The oysters were maintained at a density of 10 to 15 per 35-liter aquarium and sacrificed after 4 weeks for analysis of P. marinus infection level.
In order to most accurately and sensitively quantify the infection level following experimental infection, P. marinus cells were enumerated using the whole body burden technique (10, 14). Briefly, the oyster soft tissues were finely minced and incubated at room temperature for 7 days in 20 ml of fluid thioglycolate medium (2.9% FTM; T-9032; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, Mo.; 2% NaCl) supplemented with penicillin-streptomycin solution (5% [vol/vol]; P-0781; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc.). Following incubation, the tissue was pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended in 20 ml of 2 M NaOH, and held at 60°C for 3 to 4 h to dissolve the oyster tissue. The enlarged P. marinus prezoosporangia (hypnospores) were then pelleted, washed three times in distilled water, stained with a 1:5 dilution of Lugol's iodine, immobilized on a 0.45-μm filter by vacuum, and enumerated by light microscopy. When necessary, dilutions of the hypnospores were made in distilled water and counted in triplicate, and the mean count was extrapolated to the volume of the sample. The resultant counts were loge transformed for analysis of variance and for Tukey's multiple comparisons test, using a 5% error rate.
Analysis of proteolytic enzyme expression.
Supernatants from P. marinus cultures and their respective media controls were analyzed for protease production by zymography. Twenty microliters of media or culture supernatant was electrophoresed under nonreducing conditions by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (24) using an 8% polyacrylamide separating gel copolymerized with 0.1% porcine gelatin (G-8150; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc.) and a 4% stacking gel. Following electrophoresis, the gels were washed three times for 10 min in 2.5% Triton X-100 (BP151; Fisher Scientific, Fairlawn, N.J.) to renature the proteins and then once in 0.1 M Tris HCl (pH 8.0; BP152; Fisher Scientific). The gels were then incubated at 37°C in a fresh change of Tris HCl (pH 8.0) buffer. While use of buffers from pH 4.0 to 9.0 have previously been shown not to alter the P. marinus zymographic profile, pH 8.0 is optimum for detection of P. marinus proteolytic activities by zymogram (27) and has been specifically used for the study of the modulation of protease expression under various media supplementation schemes (29). Following incubation, the gels were stained overnight in Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 (0.1%; 161-0406; Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) in 40% methanol-10% acetic acid. The gels were destained in the same solution, without the stain. The gels were then assessed for the presence of cleared bands corresponding to the location of gelatinolytic proteases. Since the gels were, by necessity, run under nonreducing conditions, no attempt was made to assign absolute molecular masses to them. The proteases are, for convenience, referred to as high- (>50-kDa) and low- (< 50-kDa) molecular mass species.
Assessment of differences in infectivity among several isolates of P. marinus.
P. marinus clonal isolates LA10-1 (ATCC 50906; genotype 4), MA2-11 (ATCC 50896; genotype 1), SC3-2 (genotype 3) (6), and P-1 (genotype 9) (13), and the isolate HVA-18 (ATCC 50764; genotype 8) (6) were cultured for use in an infection trial and were selected based on previous genotype identification at eight polymorphic loci (38). The HVA-18 isolate was not initially cloned; however, genetic analysis of this isolate at three loci showed little genetic variability, supporting the possibility that it has become clonal by serial passage (unpublished data). All cultures were seeded at 106 cells per ml in 75-cm2 flasks containing 50 ml of a supplemented Dulbecco modified Eagle's medium-Ham's medium with 5% FBS, commonly known as Dungan's medium (11, 16). Cultures were maintained in a humidified incubator at 27°C under 5% CO2 for 3 weeks and harvested for oyster challenge, and the culture supernatants were assayed by zymography. Prior to challenge, cells were enumerated by hemacytometer and their mean was size estimated using an ocular micrometer. Twenty C. virginica ME oysters per group were subjected to experimental infection.
Assessment of the effects of oyster plasma and tissue homogenate supplementation on P. marinus infectivity.
The P-1 isolate of P. marinus was chosen for further study based on its demonstrated potential to alter its secretion profile of high- and low-molecular-mass proteases following media supplementation. Both plasma and tissue homogenate-supplemented media induced similar changes in P-1 protease expression, but only homogenate altered cell size and morphology, allowing the opportunity to distinguish correlations between these alterations and parasite infectivity. Hemolymph was withdrawn from the adductor muscle through a shell notch in three C. virginica ME oysters, using a syringe fitted with a 25-gauge needle. The hemocytes were removed by centrifugation (500 × g, 5 min), and the plasma was pooled and filtered through a 0.22-μm filter (μStar LB; Costar, Corning, Inc., Acton, Mass.). The oyster tissues were pooled and processed for homogenate basically in the manner described in MacIntyre et al. (29). Briefly, the oyster soft tissue was finely minced, suspended in 10 ml of cold artificial seawater, and homogenized using a glass Tenbroek homogenizer. This homogenate was centrifuged for 30 min at 2,500 × g at 4°C, and the supernatant was withdrawn and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for an additional 30 min at 4°C. This partially clarified homogenate was then filtered to 0.22 μm by syringe filters, and the protein content was assayed by the bicinchoninic acid technique (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.).
Cultures of the P-1 isolate of P. marinus were seeded at 106 cells per ml in 75-cm2 flasks containing 50 ml of ODRP-3 medium without supplementation or supplemented with 0.3 mg of plasma/ml or 0.3 mg of tissue homogenate/ml. The P. marinus cells used in this experiment had been cultured on a long-term basis in unsupplemented ODRP-3 prior to exposure to the media supplements. Cultures were maintained in a humidified incubator at 27°C under 5% CO2 for 4 weeks. Cells were then harvested for oyster challenge, and the culture supernatants were assayed by zymography. Prior to challenge, cells were enumerated by hemacytometer and their mean size was estimated using an ocular micrometer. Thirty C. virginica ME oysters per group were subjected to experimental infection.
Assessment of the effects of homogenate supplementation on P. marinus cell size, morphology, and life stages.
In view of the restitution of infectivity and superior induction of proteases by oyster homogenate (see Results), it was elected to investigate in greater detail the effects of homogenate supplementation on the P. marinus P-1 isolate. Cells were cultured in ODRP-3 medium supplemented with homogenates of tissues from five individual C. virginica WA, C. gigas, and C. ariakensis oysters. FBS and fetuin were used as control supplements. ODRP-3 medium was supplemented at 1.0, 0.33, 0.11, 0.037, 0.012, and 0.004 mg/ml on a protein basis or was left unsupplemented. Each well was seeded with 106 P. marinus cells in 1 ml of medium in duplicated 48-well tissue culture plates. An additional set of unseeded plates were maintained as media controls. All plates were held in a humidified incubator at 27°C under 5% CO2 for 6 weeks.
Following incubation, the cells were resuspended (30 100-μl passages through a 200-μl pipette tip) prior to hemacytometer counts of single and clustered trophozoites. The exact enumeration of the cells within clusters was not possible, as they were extremely adherent, and thus clusters were ranked as groups of 2 to 3, 4, 5 to 16, and greater than 16 cells. Additionally, measurements of cell diameters of 10 trophozoites were completed for each culture well using an ocular micrometer, at a magnification of ×400. In order to simultaneously compare changes in both cell volume and count, a pellet volume was calculated as the average cell volume [(4/3)πr3] multiplied by the estimated total cell number, with cell numbers in clusters estimated by multiplying by 2.5, 4, 10.5, and 32 times the number of clusters of 2 to 3, 4, 5 to 16, and >16 cells, respectively. The volume of the ODRP-3 controls was then subtracted from all groups to assess deviation from the control culture. Culture supernatants from all treatments were analyzed for protease activity by zymography.
Assessment of the effects of homogenate supplementation from different Crassostrea species and C. virginica populations on P. marinus infectivity.
Oyster tissue homogenates were produced from pooled tissues of three oysters from each of the test groups, C. virginica LA, C. virginica TG, C. virginica XB, C. virginica WA, C. gigas, and C. ariakensis. Cultures of the P-1 isolate of P. marinus were seeded at 106 cells per ml in 75-cm2 flasks containing 50 ml of ODRP-3 medium without supplementation or supplemented at 0.25 mg/ml with homogenates from each of the oyster groups. This supplementation level was chosen based on prior observations of alterations in P. marinus culture cell count, morphological characteristics, and protease production. Cultures were maintained in a humidified incubator at 27°C under 5% CO2 for 4 weeks. Cells were then harvested for oyster challenge, and the culture supernatants were retained for zymography. Prior to challenge, cells were enumerated by hemacytometer and their mean size was estimated by measurement of 10 cells per treatment using an ocular micrometer. Thirty C. virginica WA oysters per group were subjected to experimental infection.
RESULTS
P. marinus clonal isolates display a range of infectivity and protease expression.
P. marinus clonal isolate cell diameters were consistent within each group, ranging from 2 μm (SC3-2) to 4 μm (LA10-1, MA2-11, and P-1). The cell size of the HVA-18 isolate was more variable, ranging from 2 to 6 μm. All cells in the cultures were single trophozoites, with little to no clustering of cells. There were significant differences in the oyster P. marinus body burdens 4 weeks after experimental infection (Fig. 1A), with body burdens in all groups significantly greater than that in SC3-2. The LA10-1, P-1, and HVA-18 isolates were not significantly different. The MA2-11 isolate was significantly more infective than both the P-1 and the HVA-18 isolates. There were no mortalities, and all sham-injected oysters were negative for P. marinus infection.
FIG. 1.
Infectivity level and secreted protease profiles of selected P. marinus isolates. (A) Mean body burden ± standard error of oysters infected with P. marinus isolates. Cells were grown for 3 weeks in Dungan's medium at 27°C in 5% CO2 and then injected at 106 cells per oyster per day on days 1, 3, and 5 into 20 C. virginica ME oysters per group. After 4 weeks, the oysters were sacrificed and total P. marinus body burden was assessed and loge transformed for statistical analysis. Groups with different numbers were significantly different (P < 0.001). (B) Gelatin zymogram of 20 μl of culture supernatant from P. marinus isolate cultures used in the above infection trial. Nonreducing, 8% acrylamide, 0.1% porcine gelatin SDS-PAGE gels were incubated for 3 h at 37°C in 0.1 M Tris HCl, pH 8.0, and then stained with Coomassie brilliant blue G-250. Molecular masses are in kilodaltons.
Low-molecular-weight proteases were most strongly expressed in the culture supernatants of HVA-18 and MA2-11 (Fig. 1B). The LA10-1 and P-1 isolates also showed some weak low-molecular-weight protease activity. High-molecular-weight proteases were most prominent in the HVA-18 and P-1 culture supernatants. The SC3-2 culture supernatant did not have any apparent protease activity. The FBS proteins, which can be visualized as dark bands on the zymogram, were degraded to some extent in the MA2-11 and P-1 cultures and were completely degraded in the HVA-18 culture.
Infectivity of P. marinus isolate P-1 is increased by medium supplementation with oyster plasma or tissue homogenate.
Unsupplemented cells and cells supplemented with plasma were similarly sized, with most cells being 5 to 6 μm. The homogenate-supplemented cells were larger, at ∼10 μm, and had frequent multicellular tomont structures, as well as numerous clusters of adherent cells. These were not seen in the plasma-supplemented or the unsupplemented cultures. Gelatin zymograms demonstrated production of low-molecular-weight proteases in supplemented cultures, with greater activity induced by homogenate supplementation (Fig. 2B). The media controls did not demonstrate any proteolytic activity.
FIG. 2.
Infectivity level and secreted protease profiles of P. marinus isolate P-1 in plasma and homogenate-supplemented cultures. (A) Mean body burden ± standard error of oysters infected with P. marinus isolate P-1 grown for 4 weeks in ODRP-3 medium without supplementation or supplemented with 0.3 mg of oyster plasma or homogenate/ml at 27°C in 5% CO2 and then injected at 106 cells per oyster per day on days 1, 3, and 5 into 30 C. virginica ME oysters per group. After 4 weeks, the oysters were sacrificed and the total P. marinus body burden was assessed and loge transformed for statistical analysis. Groups with different numbers were significantly different (P < 0.001). (B) Gelatin zymogram of 20 μl of culture supernatant from supplemented and unsupplemented P. marinus cultures from the above infection trial. Nonreducing, 8% acrylamide, 0.1% porcine gelatin SDS-PAGE gels were incubated for 3 h at 37°C in 0.1 M Tris HCl, pH 8.0, and then stained with Coomassie brilliant blue G-250. Molecular masses are in kilodaltons.
Infection levels at 4 weeks were significantly higher in oysters challenged with P. marinus from supplemented cultures than in those grown in ODRP-3 medium (Fig. 2A). Sham-injected controls were all negative for P. marinus infection. There were 7, 9, 10, and 3 oyster mortalities in the homogenate, plasma, unsupplemented, and sham injection groups through the course of the experiment. The cause of the mortalities could not be determined due to rapid degradation of the oyster tissues.
Oyster tissue homogenate alters P. marinus proliferation, size, morphology, and protease expression.
Oyster homogenate supplements from all three oyster species resulted in the occurrence of multicellular clusters, which were resistant to disaggregation by pipetting (Fig. 3 and 4). While no shared exterior wall could be visualized, these multicellular clusters were often compressed and were similar in appearance to tomonts. P-1 isolate total cell counts were diminished by oyster homogenate supplementation, regardless of the oyster species (Fig. 3). This effect was dose dependent, with some effect seen even at the lowest supplementation levels. Cells supplemented with C. ariakensis homogenate at 1.0 mg/ml appeared to be nonviable, as assessed by neutral red uptake. Supplementation with fetuin was associated with minor diminishment in the number of cells at low and intermediate concentrations and a moderate increase in cell count at the 1.0-mg/ml supplementation level (Fig. 3). Cultures supplemented with FBS behaved similarly to those supplemented with fetuin; however, there was a large increase in proliferation at the highest supplementation levels. When supplemented at 1.0 mg/ml with FBS, the P. marinus cell count was approximately 2.5-fold higher than in the ODRP-3 control.
FIG. 3.
Mean counts of single trophozoites, multicell clusters, and calculated total cell number (see text) from P. marinus isolate P-1 cultures supplemented with a range of doses of tissue homogenate from five C. virginica WA (CvWA), C. ariakensis (Ca), or C. gigas (Cg) oysters, or with FBS or fetuin. Cultures were incubated for 6 weeks at 27°C in 5% CO2, resuspended by repeated pipetting, and enumerated with a hemacytometer. Counts are the mean of duplicate cultures from each of five separate oysters tested. FBS and fetuin were tested in duplicate. Standard error bars, analysis of variance significance, and multiple comparison results are shown for single trophozoites. Groups with different numbers were significantly different. Note: homogenates from two of five C. gigas oysters were not in sufficient concentration to allow 1.0-mg/ml supplementation; therefore, this dose was omitted for these oysters.
FIG. 4.
Light micrograph (neutral red stain; magnification, ×1,000) of P. marinus isolate P-1 cultures supplemented with a range of tissue homogenate concentrations from five C. virginica WA (CvWA), C. ariakensis (Ca), or C. gigas (Cg) oysters or with FBS or fetuin. Cultures were incubated for 6 weeks at 27°C in 5% CO2, resuspended by repeated pipetting, and digitally photographed.
Most multicellular clusters observed in the homogenate-supplemented medium consisted of 5 to 16 aggregated cells. The degree of cell clustering was dose dependent and was typically maximal at intermediate supplement concentrations. The C. virginica WA-supplemented cultures had a peak in the number of clusters at 0.11 mg/ml and maintained clusters to the highest dose tested. C. ariakensis- and C. gigas-supplemented cultures had a peak in cell clustering at the lower supplementation level of 0.037 mg/ml. There was a precipitous decline in the occurrence of these clusters at the 0.33-mg/ml dose for C. ariakensis and at the 1.0-mg/ml dose for C. gigas. Neither fetuin nor FBS supplementation was associated with formation of multicellular clusters.
Homogenate supplementation from all three oyster species also resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the mean P. marinus cell size (Fig. 4 and 5). Cells supplemented at 1.0 mg/ml had an over-threefold-larger diameter than unsupplemented cells. Neither FBS nor fetuin supplementation resulted in a change in the cell size compared with the ODRP-3 control. The calculated cell pellet volume was greater than that of unsupplemented cultures at the highest supplementation levels for FBS-, fetuin-, and C. virginica WA-supplemented cultures (Fig. 5B). Both C. ariakensis- and C. gigas-supplemented cultures had volumes greater than unsupplemented cultures only at the 0.33-mg/ml supplementation level.
FIG. 5.
Supplemented culture cell size and deviation of pellet volume from unsupplemented control cultures. (A) Cell size ± standard deviation from P. marinus isolate P-1 cultures supplemented with a range of tissue homogenate concentrations from five C. virginica WA (CvWA), C. ariakensis (Ca), or C. gigas (Cg) oysters or with FBS or fetuin. Cultures were incubated for 6 weeks at 27°C in 5% CO2, resuspended by repeated pipetting, and measured at 400× magnification using an ocular micrometer. Sizes of 10 trophozoites were measured in duplicated culture wells supplemented with homogenates of five separate oysters per group. C. gigas (Cg) measurements included only three oyster supplements at the 1.0-mg/ml dose. (B) Deviation of calculated pellet volume (see text) of P. marinus isolate P-1 grown in supplemented cultures from the mean unsupplemented pellet volume.
A dose-dependent increase in low-molecular-weight protease production was observed, as expected, in cultures supplemented with C. virginica WA oyster homogenate (Fig. 6). Homogenates from the P. marinus-tolerant C. gigas oysters did not induce low-molecular-weight proteases. The C. ariakensis oyster homogenate induced low-molecular-weight proteases only at the 1.0-mg/ml supplementation level, and these bands were faint and difficult to visualize on the zymogram. Both FBS and fetuin induced low-molecular-weight proteases at supplementation levels of 0.33 mg/ml and above. Oyster supplement protease activity was seen at approximately 60 kDa in the homogenate-supplemented cultures and media controls, especially at the highest dosage levels. This protease activity was fully inhibited by the addition of 10 mM EDTA to the incubation buffer and is therefore assumed to represent oyster metalloprotease activity similar to that described by Ziegler et al. (42).
FIG. 6.
Gelatin zymogram of 20 μl of culture supernatant from P. marinus isolate P-1 cultures supplemented with 1.0 (a), 0.33 (b), 0.11 (c), 0.037 (d), 0.012 (e), or 0.004 (f) mg of tissue homogenate/ml from C. virginica WA (CvWA), C. ariakensis (Ca), or C. gigas (Cg) oysters or with FBS or fetuin. ODRP-3 is the unsupplemented control. Cultures were grown for 6 weeks at 27°C in 5% CO2. Nonreducing, 8% acrylamide, 0.1% porcine gelatin SDS-PAGE gels were incubated for 3 h at 37°C in 0.1 M Tris HCl, pH 8.0, and then stained with Coomassie brilliant blue G-250. Molecular masses are in kilodaltons.
Oyster tissue homogenates from different oyster species and populations cause increased infectivity.
P. marinus isolate P-1 cell cultures were supplemented with 0.25 mg of oyster homogenate/ml from C. virginica LA, C. virginica WA, C. virginica TG, C. virginica XB, C. ariakensis, and C. gigas oysters. Cells from C. ariakensis-, C. virginica LA-, and C. virginica TG-supplemented cultures had a similar mean size of 7.6 to 7.7 μm. Cells supplemented with C. virginica XB were slightly larger, with a mean size of 9.0 μm, and those supplemented with C. virginica WA were smaller, at 5.2 μm. Unsupplemented cultures had a mean cell size of 4.1 μm. All homogenate-supplemented cultures formed large clusters of cells resistant to disaggregation by pipetting. No clusters were noted in the unsupplemented culture.
All homogenate supplements tested in the infection study resulted in increased body burdens; however, only those oysters infected with cells pulsed with C. ariakensis or C. virginica LA homogenate had body burdens significantly different than that of the ODRP-3 control (Fig. 7A). There was one mortality in the C. virginica LA group, two in the C. virginica XB group, and three each in the C. ariakensis and C. virginica WA groups. Sham-injected oysters were negative for P. marinus infection and experienced no mortalities. Cells grown in the C. gigas homogenate-supplemented cultures were not viable at the time of infection, as assessed by neutral red uptake. The cause of this is not known, as concentrations of C. gigas homogenate both above and below this level were used in other experiments without loss of culture viability. Gelatin zymograms demonstrated induction of low-molecular-weight protease in the C. virginica LA culture only (Fig. 7B). The unsupplemented ODRP-3 culture displayed the typical high-molecular-weight proteases. High-molecular-weight protease activity in the C. ariakensis and the C. virginica XB cultures was greatly diminished. No protease activity was detected in the media controls.
FIG. 7.
Infectivity level and secreted protease profiles of P. marinus isolate P-1 grown in homogenate supplemented cultures. (A) Mean body burden ± standard error of oysters infected with P. marinus isolate P-1 grown for 4 weeks at 27°C in 5% CO2 in ODRP-3 medium without supplementation or supplemented with 0.25 mg of homogenate/ml from C. ariakensis (Ca) or from C. virginica oysters from Louisiana (CvLA), Tangier Sound, Chesapeake Bay (Va.; CvTG), Washington state (CvWA), or from the CROSBreed program (CvXB). A total of 106 cells per oyster per day were injected on days 1, 3, and 5 into 30 C. virginica WA oysters per group. After 4 weeks, the oysters were sacrificed and total P. marinus body burden was assessed and loge transformed for statistical analysis. Groups with different numbers were considered significantly different (P = 0.007). (B) Gelatin zymogram of 20 μl of culture supernatant from P. marinus isolate P-1 grown for 4 weeks at 27°C in 5% CO2 in ODRP-3 medium without supplementation or supplemented with 0.25 mg of homogenate/ml as described above. Nonreducing, 8% acrylamide, 0.1% porcine gelatin SDS-PAGE gels were incubated overnight at 37°C in 0.1 M Tris HCl, pH 8.0, with 10 mM EDTA included to limit oyster metalloprotease activity on the zymogram that obscured some of the lower-intensity P. marinus serine proteases. The gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue G-250. Molecular masses are in kilodaltons.
DISCUSSION
Neither the physical nor the biochemical mechanisms of P. marinus infectivity or virulence are understood; however, this parasite can be rapidly attenuated by in vitro culture (16). The mechanism of this attenuation is not known, but it may be due to the lack of critical growth, differentiation, or virulence induction factors provided by the host. Previous attempts to restore virulence by passage of in vitro-cultured parasites through a host oyster did not succeed, presumably because of the brief reculture required to produce an inoculum prior to challenge (16). This suggests that attenuation occurs quite rapidly.
P. marinus isolates.
Nonclonal P. marinus isolates have been shown to vary in virulence, with Atlantic coast isolates being more virulent than those from the Gulf of Mexico (4, 5). In this study, isolates of P. marinus that were chosen based on their assignment by genetic markers into distinct genotypes (37) displayed differences in infectivity, as evidenced by the 4-week body burden (Fig. 1A). The South Carolina isolate, SC3-2, was associated with the lowest level of infection. Eight of the experimental oysters infected with SC3-2 were negative for P. marinus infection at week 4, and the highest body burden in any oyster infected with SC3-2 was 96 cells.
It is possible that the small size of the SC3-2 isolate (∼2 μm) rendered the cells less likely to be phagocytosed by mantle cavity hemocytes or ingested during feeding. The efficiency of particle filtration by oysters varies directly with the size of the particle (22, 34, 39), and previous studies have demonstrated that ingestion of P. marinus is one probable route of parasitic infection (1). While it has also been suggested that hemocytes in the mantle cavity may be responsible for transport of P. marinus into the oyster (9, 36), it is not known whether there are size-mediated differences in rates of phagocytosis and transport of P. marinus into the oyster by hemocytes. Given these results, there is an indication that P. marinus cell size could be a factor in its infectivity.
Supplementation and infectivity.
The possibility that cell size is a determinant of infectivity was not supported, however, by the results of the other infection trials. When P. marinus P-1 isolate cells were grown in the presence of oyster plasma supplement, the cell size and morphology were similar to those of unsupplemented cultures. The body burden after experimental infection, however, was significantly higher and was statistically similar to that seen with cells enlarged by culture in homogenate-supplemented media. Additionally, despite inducing similar body burdens (Fig. 7A), P-1 cells from cultures supplemented with C. virginica WA and C. virginica XB homogenates had markedly different mean sizes (5.2 and 9.0 μm, respectively). The cells with the greatest infectivity were those supplemented with C. ariakensis homogenate, and they were very similar in size (mean, ∼7.6 μm) to two other groups with lesser infectivities, C. virginica LA and C. virginica TG. In this latter infection study, infections were initiated in C. virginica WA oysters, and it should be noted that the magnitude of the body burdens at 4 weeks was markedly lower than was seen in the earlier trials using C. virginica ME oysters. The cause of this is not known, but it is assumed that the C. virginica WA oysters may be more resistant to P. marinus infection. This is particularly interesting because this population of oysters has been isolated from P. marinus for numerous generations (31).
The ability to increase parasite infectivity appears to be a property specific to host plasma and tissue homogenates. Supplementation of cell cultures with FBS in Dungan's medium does not cause the increases in infectivity seen with oyster homogenate or plasma supplementation. The mean 4-week body burden from C. virginica ME oysters infected with P-1 grown in Dungan's medium with FBS was 2,327 cells (Fig. 1A), while C. virginica ME oysters infected with P-1 grown in plasma and homogenate had mean burdens of 18,975 and 25,311, respectively (Fig. 2A).
Morphology, size, and proliferation.
Oyster homogenate supplements were the most effective inducers of morphological changes, altered the protease profiles, and increased infectivity. Supplementation of medium with homogenates from either susceptible or tolerant oyster species resulted in a marked reduction in cell proliferation at increasing doses (Fig. 3). At the 1.0-mg/ml supplementation level for both C. ariakensis and C. gigas homogenates, there was a decrease in cell number below the seeding concentration, with the C. ariakensis cells appearing to be nonviable (Fig. 4). At high supplementation levels, the diminution was similar between all oyster species supplements. At the lowest two supplement doses, the suppressive effect was more pronounced in the disease-tolerant C. ariakensis and C. gigas oysters (Fig. 3). The suppression of proliferation was only associated with oyster product supplementation. Fetuin supplementation caused a minor decrease in cell proliferation that was consistent at lower supplement doses. Both the 0.33- and 1.0-mg/ml supplementation levels were similar to the ODRP-3 control. FBS behaved similarly, except that there was a large increase in proliferation at the 0.33-mg/ml, and especially at the 1.0-mg/ml, supplementation levels. This is in general agreement with the findings of Gauthier and Vasta (19), who previously described the proliferative effects of FBS and fetuin on P. marinus cultures.
Since increasing supplementation levels with oyster homogenates are associated with decreasing cell counts (Fig. 3) and increasing cell size (Fig. 4 and 5A), it was desirable to understand their combined effects using the calculated pellet volumes. The results were not surprising for the FBS and fetuin cultures. Cell sizes did not change over the range of supplementation and there were no cell clusters, and thus, the pellet volumes paralleled the cell counts. However, supplementation with any oyster homogenate was associated with a reduced pellet volume at the three lowest dosage levels (Fig. 5B). At 0.11 mg/ml, the C. virginica WA-supplemented cells had a pellet volume in excess of that of the ODRP-3 control. At 0.33 mg/ml, this effect was even more pronounced in the C. virginica WA oyster group and was seen in both the C. gigas- and C. ariakensis-supplemented cultures, despite the continuing decrease in cell count. At 1.0 mg/ml, the C. virginica WA culture pellet volume was nearly 8 mm3 larger than that of the ODRP-3 control. At this highest supplementation level, the C. gigas pellet volume again fell below that of the ODRP-3 control, as did that of the nonviable C. ariakensis culture.
In vivo, P. marinus cells range in size from 3.9 to 11.6 μm, with a mean of 5.5 μm (35), similar to that elicited by medium supplementation with oyster products. The association of larger cell size with lower replication rate may indicate there is a regulation of mitosis by exposure to host products. P. marinus appears to regulate its replication, especially at high infection intensities, such that the parasite burden remains at nonlethal levels (40). This regulation may be based on energy limitations (10). The decreased in vivo replication rate could also be mediated by an ability of P. marinus to sense cell density and decrease replication rate accordingly, as has been documented in certain quorum-sensing bacteria (41). This does not seem likely, as previous studies have found that the presence of P. marinus cells and extracellular products has a positive effect on the in vitro replication rate (6, 21). Alternatively, this change may represent a partial transition to the prezoosporangium life stage. In fluid thioglycolate medium, trophozoite maturation to prezoosporangia (hypnospores) is associated with thickening of the cell wall and marked enlargement of the vacuole, resulting in cell enlargement to 30 to 80 μm (35). While this enlargement is considerably greater than is seen in supplemented cultures, it is nonetheless possible that supplementation results in the preliminary phases of transition to this life stage.
The present data suggest that there may be a molecular signal present in all three oyster species tested which regulates P. marinus proliferation. Since this effect occurs only with tissue homogenates, the signaling molecule could be a product of tissue degradation. In that case, an increase in the number of P. marinus cells during infection and the associated tissue damage from proteolytic activity could signal P. marinus to decrease the replication rate and allow the oyster to survive longer in the parasitized state. This possibility is supported by the greater potency of the homogenate effect of the tolerant C. gigas and C. ariakensis oysters on P. marinus cell replication (Fig. 3).
Protease induction.
The initial work investigating the induction of proteases by oyster homogenate (29) was largely confirmed by the dose-response experiment, though there was some induction of low-molecular-weight proteases by C. ariakensis homogenate, FBS, and fetuin at doses above those assessed in the earlier research. The induction of low-molecular-weight proteases did correlate with infectivity in cultures supplemented with oyster plasma and homogenate (Fig. 3 and 4). It is tempting to correlate increased infectivity with induction of these proteases under exposure to conditions that more closely mimic the in vivo environment. The strongest induction of low-molecular-weight proteases and the highest body burdens were seen in the cells supplemented with homogenate. Similarly, the intermediate level of protease production by plasma-supplemented cells was associated with a slightly, though not significantly, lower body burden. Both were more virulent than the ODRP-3 control, which produced little to no low-molecular-weight protease.
The relationship between induction of low-molecular-weight proteases and increased infectivity was not consistent in the other experiments. In the clonal isolates grown in Dungan's medium, the SC3-2 isolate was the least virulent and demonstrated little to no protease activity in the culture supernatant (Fig. 1 and 2). The LA10-1 and P-1 isolate also had lower levels of protease expression in general, and weak low-molecular-weight protease expression in particular, and were more virulent than SC3-2. The HVA-18 isolate had infectivity similar to LA10-1 and P-1, but it had the greatest amount of low-molecular-weight protease expression. The most virulent isolate, MA2-11, had a level of low-molecular-weight protease expression that was intermediate between that of HVA-18 and LA10-1 and P-1. It is interesting that the two Virginia isolates, HVA-18 and P-1, more strongly expressed the series of high-molecular-weight proteases.
When the P-1 isolate was exposed to 0.25 mg of various oyster homogenates/ml, the C. virginica LA- and C. ariakensis-supplemented cultures were the most infective (Fig. 7A). While the C. virginica LA supplementation induced low-molecular-weight proteases, that supplemented with C. ariakensis did not. In addition, the C. ariakensis-supplemented medium elicited a decreased level of high-molecular-weight protease activity (Fig. 7B). Given these varied results, there does not appear to be a consistent correlation between the in vitro induction of low-molecular-weight proteases by homogenate supplementation and infectivity as measured by week 4 body burden.
The origin of the low-molecular-weight proteases and their relationship to the higher-weight forms is not clear. There often appears to be a diminishment in high-molecular-weight protease activity associated with increases in the appearance of the low-molecular-weight forms. It is not known if these changes in the protease profile are due to changes at the transcriptional, translational, posttranslational, or secretory level. Previous research has demonstrated that the low-molecular-weight forms cannot be created from the high-molecular-weight forms by incubation in the presence of host products (29), indicating that the low-molecular-weight forms are likely not originated by proteolytic cleavage of a multimeric form.
The supplementation of P. marinus cultures with oyster products from either disease-tolerant or -susceptible oysters modulates cell proliferation, size, and morphology, as well as protease expression and infectivity. Many of these effects cannot be reproduced using common bovine media supplements. None of these varied effects appeared to be linked in all cases, indicating that exposure to oyster products likely causes a complex alteration in P. marinus physiology, resulting in a multitude of phenotypic and functional changes.
Acknowledgments
We thank Vincent Encomio for providing the Yeocomico-deployed C. virginica oysters and Stan Allen for providing C. ariakensis oysters. We also thank Marta Gómez-Chiarri, Eugene Burreson, and Sylvain DeGuise for their critical review of the manuscript.
This work is a result of research sponsored in part by the NOAA Office of Sea Grant, U.S. Department of Commerce, under grant no. NA16RG1697 to the Virginia Graduate Marine Science Consortium and Virginia Sea Grant College Program. C.E. was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship.
REFERENCES
- 1.Alvarez, M. R., F. E. Friedl, C. M. Hudson, and R. L. O'Neill. 1992. Uptake and tissue distribution of abiotic particles for the alimentary tract of the American oyster: a simulation of intracellular parasitism. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 59:290-294. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barber, B. J., and R. Mann. 1994. Growth and mortality of eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin, 1791), and Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) under challenge from the parasite, Perkinsus marinus. J. Shellfish Res. 13:109-114. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Burreson, E. M., and L. M. Ragone-Calvo. 1996. Epizootiology of Perkinsus marinus disease of oysters in Chesapeake Bay, with emphasis on data since 1985. J. Shellfish Res. 15:17-34. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bushek, D., and S. K. Allen. 1996. Host-parasite interactions among broadly distributed populations of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica and the protozoan Perkinsus marinus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 139:127-141. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bushek, D., and S. K. Allen. 1996. Races of Perkinsus marinus. J. Shellfish Res. 15:103-107. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bushek, D., R. A. Holley, and K. S. Reece. 2000. Use of micromanipulation and “feeder layers” to clone the oyster pathogen Perkinsus marinus. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 47:164-166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Calvo, G. W., M. W. Luckenbach, S. K. Allen, and E. M. Burreson. 2001. A comparative field study of Crassostrea ariakensis (Fujita 1913) and Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin 1791) in relation to salinity in Virginia. J. Shellfish Res. 20:221-229. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Calvo, G. W., M. W. Luckenbach, S. K. Allen, and E. M. Burreson. 2000. A comparative field study of Crassostrea ariakensis and Crassostrea virginica in relation to salinity in Virginia. Spec. Rep. Appl. Mar. Sci. Ocean Eng. 360:1-17. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chintala, M. M., D. Bushek, and S. E. Ford. 2002. Comparison of in vitro-cultured and wild-type Perkinsus marinus. II. Dosing methods and host response. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 51:203-216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Choi, K. S., E. A. Wilson, D. H. Lewis, E. N. Powell, and S. M. Ray. 1989. The energetic cost of Perkinsus marinus parasitism in oysters: quantification of the thioglycollate method. J. Shellfish Res. 8:125-131. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dungan, C. F., and R. M. Hamilton. 1995. Use of a tetrazolium-based cell proliferation assay to measure effects of in vitro conditions on Perkinsus marinus (Apicomplexa) proliferation. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 42:379-388. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Earnhart, C. G., and S. L. Kaattari. 2003. The humoral response to in vitro generated parasite antigens is enhanced by the removal of a defined media component prior to immunization. J. Immunol. Methods 278:67-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Faisal, M., D. Y. Schafhauser, K. A. Garreis, E. Elsayed, and J. F. LaPeyre. 1999. Isolation and characterization of Perkinsus marinus proteases using bacitracin-sepharose affinity chromatography. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 123:417-426. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fisher, W. S., and L. M. Oliver. 1996. A whole-oyster procedure for diagnosis of Perkinsus marinus disease using Ray's fluid thioglycollate culture medium. J. Shellfish Res. 15:109-117. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ford, S. E. 1996. Range extension by the oyster parasite Perkinsus marinus into the northeastern United States: response to climate change? J. Shellfish Res. 15:45-56. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ford, S. E., M. M. Chintala, and D. Bushek. 2002. Comparison of in vitro-cultured and wild-type Perkinsus marinus. I. Pathogen virulence. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 51:187-201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Garreis, K. A., J. F. LaPeyre, and M. Faisal. 1996. The effects of Perkinsus marinus extracellular products and purified proteases on oyster defense parameters in vitro. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 6:581-597. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gauthier, J. D., B. Feig, and G. R. Vasta. 1995. Effect of fetal bovine serum glycoproteins on the in vitro proliferation of the oyster parasite Perkinsus marinus: development of a fully defined medium. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 42:307-313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gauthier, J. D., and G. R. Vasta. 1993. Continuous in vitro culture of the eastern oyster parasite Perkinsus marinus. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 62:321-323. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gauthier, J. D., and G. R. Vasta. 2002. Effects of plasma from bivalve mollusk species on the in vitro proliferation of the protistan parasite Perkinsus marinus. J. Exp. Zool. 292:221-230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gauthier, J. D., and G. R. Vasta. 1995. In vitro culture of the eastern oyster parasite Perkinsus marinus: optimization of the methodology. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 66:156-168. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Haven, D. S., and R. Morales-Alamo. 1970. Filtration of particles from suspension by the American oyster Crassostrea virginica. Biol. Bull. 139:248-264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kleinschuster, S. J., and S. L. Swink. 1993. A simple method for the in vitro culture of Perkinsus marinus. Nautilus 107:76-78. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.LaPeyre, J. F., and M. Faisal. 1997. Development of a protein-free chemically defined culture medium for the propagation of the oyster pathogen Perkinsus marinus. Parasite 4:67-73. [Google Scholar]
- 26.LaPeyre, J. F., M. Faisal, and E. M. Burreson. 1993. In vitro propagation of the protozoan Perkinsus marinus, a pathogen of the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 40:304-310. [Google Scholar]
- 27.LaPeyre, J. F., D. Schafhauser, E. H. Rizkalla, and M. Faisal. 1995. Production of serine proteases by the oyster pathogen Perkinsus marinus (Apicomplexa) in vitro. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 42:544-551. [Google Scholar]
- 28.LaPeyre, J. F., H. A. Yarnall, and M. Faisal. 1996. Contribution of Perkinsus marinus extracellular products in the infection of eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 68:312-313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.MacIntyre, E. A., C. G. Earnhart, and S. L. Kaattari. 2003. Host oyster tissue extracts modulate in vitro protease expression and cellular differentiation in the protozoan parasite, Perkinsus marinus. Parasitology 126:293-302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Meyers, J. A., E. M. Burreson, B. J. Barber, and R. Mann. 1991. Susceptibility of diploid and triploid Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) and eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin, 1791), to Perkinsus marinus. J. Shellfish Res. 10:433-437. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Muñoz, P., K. Vance, and M. Gómez-Chiarri. 2003. Protease activity in the plasma of American oysters, Crassostrea virginica, experimentally infected with the protozoan parasite Perkinsus marinus. J. Parasitol. 89:941-951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Oliver, J. L., P. M. Gaffney, S. K. Allen, M. Faisal, and S. L. Kaattari. 2000. Protease inhibitory activity in selectively bred families of eastern oysters. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 12:136-145. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oliver, J. L., T. D. Lewis, M. Faisal, and S. L. Kaattari. 1999. Analysis of the effects of Perkinsus marinus proteases on plasma proteins of the Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) and the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 74:173-183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Palmer, R. E., and L. G. Williams. 1980. Effect of particle concentration on filtration efficiency of the bay scallop Argopecten irradians and the oyster Crassostrea virginica. Ophelia 19:163-174. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Perkins, F. O. 1996. The structure of Perkinsus marinus (Mackin, Owen and Collier, 1950) Levine, 1978 with comments on taxonomy and phylogeny of Perkinsus spp. J. Shellfish Res. 15:67-87. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Perkins, F. O. 1976. Zoospores of the oyster pathogen, Dermocystidium marinum. I. Fine structure of the conoid and other sporozoan-like organelles. J. Parasitol. 62:959-974. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Reece, K. S., D. Bushek, and J. E. Graves. 1997. Molecular markers for population genetic analysis of Perkinsus marinus. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 6:197-206. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reece, K. S., D. Bushek, K. L. Hudson, and J. E. Graves. 2001. Geographic distribution of Perkinsus marinus genetic strains along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the USA. Mar. Biol. 139:1047-1055. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Riisgard, H. U. 1988. Efficiency of particle retention and filtration rate in 6 species of Northeast American bivalves. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 45:217-223. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Saunders, G. L., E. N. Powell, and D. H. Lewis. 1993. A determination of in vivo growth rates for Perkinsus marinus, a parasite of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin, 1791). J. Shellfish Res. 12:229-240. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Withers, H. L., and K. Nordstrom. 1998. Quorum-sensing acts at initiation of chromosomal replication in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:15694-15699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ziegler, G., K. Paynter, and D. Fisher. 2002. Matrix metalloproteinase-like activity from hemocytes of the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 131:361-370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]