Skip to main content
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
. 2004 Jan;11(1):83–88. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.11.1.83-88.2004

Immunologic Hyporesponsiveness to Serogroup C but Not Serogroup A following Repeated Meningococcal A/C Polysaccharide Vaccination in Saudi Arabia

Hani Jokhdar 1,*, Ray Borrow 2,, Abdulrazaq Sultan 3, Mousaed Adi 4, Christine Riley 2,, Emily Fuller 2,, David Baxter 1
PMCID: PMC321352  PMID: 14715549

Abstract

In Saudi Arabia, vaccination with the meningococcal A/C polysaccharide (MACP) vaccine is advised every 3 years. A clinical outcome study was performed to test the effect of repeat vaccination with the MACP vaccine on the immune responses among Saudi nationals who live in the Makkah and Jeddah areas. Subjects (n = 230) aged 10 to 29 years were selected: 113 subjects with two or more prior vaccinations with the MACP vaccine, 79 subjects with one prior vaccination with the MACP vaccine, and 38 subjects naïve to vaccination with the MACP vaccine. All subjects received the MACP vaccine in 2002, and serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) titers were measured before and 1 month after vaccination with the MACP vaccine. For serogroup C, geometric mean SBA titers 1 month following vaccination with the MACP vaccine were 708.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 217.5 to 2,308.9) for those naïve to prior vaccination with the MACP vaccine, and they were significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than 25.0 (95% CI, 12.4 to 50.2) for those who had received one prior vaccination with the MACP vaccine and 32.4 (95% CI, 18.7 to 56.4) for those who had received two or more doses of the MACP vaccine. For serogroup A, the geometric mean SBA titer 1 month after receipt of the MACP vaccine was 1,649.3 (95% CI, 835.2 to 3,256.9) for those naïve to prior vaccination, and the titers were lower (P = 0.67) than 2,185.7 (95% CI, 1,489.4 to 3,207.7) for those who had received one prior dose of the MACP vaccine and significantly lower (P = 0.042) than 3,540.8 (95% CI, 2,705.2 to 4,634.5) for those who had received two or more doses of the MACP vaccine. For serogroup C, the proportions of nonresponders (SBA titers, <8) were 19% for the naïve cohort, 52% for the cohort with one prior vaccination, and 49% for the cohort with two or more prior vaccinations. Following repeated doses of the MACP vaccine, hyporesponsiveness to serogroup C is evident, with high percentages of MACP vaccinees having SBA titers below the putative protective SBA titer. Serogroup A responses following vaccination with the MACP vaccine were boosted. Introduction of the serogroup C conjugate vaccine would provide long-term protection against serogroup C disease; however, quadrivalent conjugate vaccines are required to provide long-time protection against disease caused by serogroups A, W135, and Y.


The annual pilgrimage during the Hajj and Umrah seasons results in more than 4 million visitors to Saudi Arabia. Such mass population movements have been associated with outbreaks of a number of infectious diseases, including meningococcal diseases (1, 2, 23, 31, 32). For more than two decades the Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia has advised both residents and pilgrims to receive the meningococcal A/C polysaccharide (MACP) vaccine, an approach which reflects the effectiveness of the meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine in controlling disease outbreaks (4, 5).

Following a Hajj-related outbreak of disease caused by serogroup W135 in 2001, the Saudi Arabian meningococcal control program was expanded in 2002 to include the quadrivalent meningococcal serogroup A, C, W135, and Y vaccine for those coming for Hajj or Umrah (6) (present vaccination requirements are continually published in the Weekly Epidemiological Record).

MACP vaccines have proved effective for the short-term control of disease caused by both serogroups A (13, 21, 22, 33) and C (7, 14, 16). The bivalent and quadrivalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines are T-cell independent and do not induce memory cells, necessitating repeat vaccinations at regular intervals.

Concerns about the induction of immunologic hyporesponsiveness after repeat vaccination with the polysaccharide vaccine have been confirmed in previous studies of the meningococcal serogroup C polysaccharide vaccine (18, 19, 27, 29, 37), whereas the results of studies of the serogroup A vaccine have conflicted (10, 15, 17, 26, 29, 38).

The Saudi Arabian requirement for meningococcal polysaccharide vaccination among local residents offered the opportunity to confirm the occurrence of immunologic hyporesponsiveness after repeat serogroup C polysaccharide vaccination and to explore the effects of repeated serogroup A polysaccharide vaccination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and subject selection.

The present study was a clinical outcome study, with subjects recruited on a prospective basis. All subjects were given the meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine as part of the routine Saudi Arabian meningococcal control program.

Study population.

The study population was randomly chosen from attendees of vaccination clinics in the Makkah and Jeddah areas based either in a general practice or schools, depending on the age group and the location of the subject. In Saudi Arabia the school class correlated to age, as follows: years 1 to 6, ages 6 to 11 years, respectively; years 7 to 9, ages 12 to 14 years, respectively; and years 10 to 12, ages 15 to 17 years, respectively.

Subjects were included if they were Saudi nationals aged 10 to 29 years (inclusive) and capable of giving written consent for participation. Subjects were excluded if they had been vaccinated against meningococcal disease outside Saudi Arabia or just prior to enrollment. Those who had received another vaccine(s) within the previous 4 weeks and those who were scheduled to receive another vaccine(s) 4 weeks post-meningococcal vaccination were excluded. Pregnant females were also excluded, as were subjects with acute febrile illness or immunosuppression from treatment or underlying disease. Subjects who were unable to attend for the second visit were also excluded.

Finally, subjects were classified into three groups according to their history of previous meningococcal polysaccharide vaccination. Data were analyzed according to the previous immunization status of the study subjects. Two research visits were scheduled. Visit 1 included prevaccination blood sampling and vaccination. Visit 2 included postvaccination blood sampling.

Vaccines.

The two vaccines used (Mencevax AC and Mencevax ACWY) were purchased from GlaxoSmithKline, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Both vaccines are lyophilized preparations of purified polysaccharide from Neisseria meningitidis of serogroups A and C for the first vaccine and of serogroups A, C, W135, and Y for the second vaccine. Each 0.5-ml dose of reconstituted vaccine contains 50 μg of serogroup A polysaccharide and 50 μg of serogroup C polysaccharide dissolved in an isotonic sodium chloride solution. The diluent supplied contains 0.25% phenol as a preservative.

Serology.

All blood samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm (Centaur 2 MSE instrument; Sanyo) for 10 min. The serum was isolated, and the samples were then labeled and frozen at −80°C. The samples were shipped to the Manchester Public Health Laboratory Service, Manchester, United Kingdom, for serogroup-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) titer determination.

SBA titers against strain F8238 (serogroup A) and strain C11 (serogroup C) were determined as described previously (30) by using baby rabbit serum (Pel-Freeze Incorporated, Rodgerson, Ariz.) as an exogenous complement source. SBA titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the final serum dilution giving ≥50% killing after 60 min for serogroup C and 90 min for serogroup A. For computational purposes titers <4 were assigned a value of 2. A reevaluation of correlates of protection for serogroup C previously showed that protection correlates with an SBA titer of between 8 and 64 (8); however, recently, by use of United Kingdom efficacy data, an SBA titer ≥8 has now been shown to be a more appropriate cutoff (3).

Serogroup A- and C-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) ELISAs were performed as described previously (12, 20). The lower limit of the assay was 0.1 μg/ml; serum samples with antibody levels <0.1 μg/ml were assigned a value of 0.05 μg/ml.

Statistical analysis.

Antibody levels were log transformed for analysis. geometric mean (GM) SBA titers and GM IgG concentrations with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The SPSS package (version 10.1) was used for statistical analysis of the data for both serogroup A and serogroup C.

A paired t test was used to test for changes in responses between time points within groups. Differences between groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance and post hoc tests.

The percentage of nonresponders to the vaccine was calculated by using an SBA titer of <8. The McNemar nonparametric test was carried out to compare the proportion of subjects who presented with SBA titers ≥8 prior to vaccination to the proportion of subjects who presented with SBA titers ≥8, ≥32, and ≥ 128 1 month following vaccination.

RESULTS

Population characteristics.

Table 1 summarizes the total numbers of subjects allocated, eligible, and participating in the study.

TABLE 1.

Population allocation and recruitment

Site No. of subjects
Total Who agreed to participate Who were eligible Who presented to first visit Who presented to second visit
School 1 525 107 82 70 61
School 2 493 65 46 42 37
School 3 336 59 31 31 30
Medical school 300 55 42 42 39
General practitioner 147 100 45 45 36
    Total 1,801 386 246 230 203

A history of previous vaccination was considered the dependent variable; accordingly, the subjects were classified into three major groups to compare the outcomes: 38 subjects were naïve to prior vaccination, 79 subjects had previously received one vaccination, and 113 subjects had previously received two or more vaccinations.

Of the 192 subjects who had previously been vaccinated, 136 subjects had been vaccinated within the previous 3 years and 56 subjects had been vaccinated ≥3 years earlier.

The subjects were classified into four age groups. The numbers of subjects by age group and gender are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

Study population classified by age and gender

Age range No. of subjects
Female Male Total
10-14 0 35 35
15-19 14 98 112
20-24 29 12 41
25-29 26 16 42
    Total 69 161 230

Serogroup A.

For serogroup A, significant increases in the GM SBA titers were demonstrated from before to 1 month after receipt of the initial dose of the meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine among the three groups (P < 0.0001). Among the naïve subjects there was a 26-fold increase in the GM SBA titer 1 month following vaccination. The other groups had three- to fourfold increases in GM SBA titers 1 month after vaccination; however, the prevaccination titer was high in comparison with the serogroup C prevaccination titer for the same groups (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

GM serogroup A SBA titers, percentage of responders, and GM serogroup A-specific IgG concentrations

History of previous vaccinationa GM SBA titer (95% CI)
GM IgG concn (μg/ml [95% CI])b
No. (%) of subjects with:
Prior to vaccination 1 mo postvaccination Prior to vaccination 1 mo postvaccination SBA titer ≥8 prior to vaccination SBA titer ≥8 1 mo after vaccination SBA titer ≥32 1 mo after vaccination SBA titer ≥128 1 mo after vaccination
Naïve to vaccination 62.6 (24.5-160.4) 1,649.3 (835.2-3,256.9) 7.1 (4.3-11.9) 41.5 (26.6-64.5) 22 (69) 31 (97) 31 (97) 30 (94)
Previously vaccinated once 575.7 (320.8-967.4) 2,185.7 (1,489.4-3,207.7) 32.8 (23.0-46.4) 91.2 (62.5-133.8) 60 (92) 63 (98) 63 (98) 62 (97)
Previously vaccinated two or more times 1,219.8 (835.4-1,781.1) 3,540.8 (2,705.2-4,634.5) 43.8 (33.6-56.9) 86.9 (66.5-113.7) 99 (96) 100 (100) 99 (99) 99 (99)
a

The numbers of subjects in the pre- and postvaccination groups were 32 and 32, respectively, for the naïve cohort; 65 and 64, respectively, for the cohort vaccinated once; and 103 and 100, respectively, for the cohort vaccinated two or more times.

b

The concentrations were determined by ELISA.

The 1 month postvaccination GM SBA titer was significantly higher for subjects who had previously been vaccinated two or more times than for subjects who were naïve to prior vaccination with the MACP vaccine (P = 0.042) but not significantly higher than the GM SBA titer for subjects who had been vaccinated once before (P = 0.127). Subjects who had been vaccinated once before had a 1.3-fold higher titer than subjects who were naïve to prior vaccination (P = 0.678) (Table 3).

As was the case for the GM SBA titer, at 1 month following vaccination there were significant increases in the IgG concentrations (as determined by ELISA) among the three study groups (P < 0.0001). However, at 1 month postvaccination naïve subjects showed significantly lower IgG concentrations (as determined by ELISA) than subjects who had previously been vaccinated either once or two or more times (P = 0.03) (Table 3).

An SBA titer ≥8 was used to identify responders. Among the subjects who were naïve to prior vaccination there was a significant increase in the percentage of responders (P = 0.016) from prevaccination to 1 month after vaccination. On the other hand, among the subjects who had been vaccinated either once or two or more times there was a very high percentage of subjects with titers ≥8 prior to vaccination, and hence, the percentage of responders had not significantly increased 1 month following vaccination (P = 0.219 and 0.125, respectively).

Data were also analyzed by age, gender, smoking status, and period since the last vaccination. None of the four factors had a significant effect on the differences in the responses to vaccination (data not shown).

Serogroup C.

For serogroup C, significant increases in GM SBA titers were demonstrated among the three groups from before to 1 month following meningococcal polysaccharide vaccination (naïve subjects, P < 0.0001; subjects vaccinated once, P = 0.018; subjects vaccinated two or more times, P < 0.0001). The naïve subjects had an increased GM SBA titer of more than 35-fold 1 month postvaccination, whereas GM SBA titers increased only about 2- to 3-fold postvaccination for the other two groups. Subjects naïve to vaccination showed significantly higher GM SBA titers 1 month following vaccination compared to those for subjects previously vaccinated one or more times (P < 0.0001) (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

Serogroup C GM SBA titers, percentage of responders, and serogroup C-specific GM IgG concentrations

History of previous vaccinationa GM SBA titer (95% CI)
GM IgG concn (μg/ml [95% CI])b
No. (%) of subjects with:
Prior to vaccination 1 mo postvaccination Prior to vaccination 1 mo postvaccination SBA titer ≥8 prior to vaccination SBA titer ≥8 1 mo after vaccination SBA titer ≥32 1 mo after vaccination SBA titer ≥128 1 mo after vaccination
Naïve to vaccination 19.0 (7.4-49.1) 708.6 (217.5-2,308.9) 3.8 (1.8-7.7) 38.8 (26.6-64.5) 13 (41) 26 (81) 25 (78) 23 (72)
Previously vaccinated once 11.3 (6.4-19.7) 25.0 (12.4-50.2) 13.8 (10.1-19.0) 27.2 (18.8-39.4) 24 (37) 31 (48) 28 (44) 23 (36)
Previously vaccinated two or more times 14.0 (8.4-23.2) 32.4 (18.7-56.4) 17.7 (13.1-24.1) 30.8 (22.7-41.8) 40 (39) 52 (51) 50 (50) 44 (44)
a

The numbers of subjects in the pre- and postvaccination groups were 32 and 32, respectively, for the naïve cohort; 65 and 64, respectively, for the cohort vaccinated once; and 103 and 101, respectively, for the cohort vaccinated two or more times.

b

The concentrations were determined by ELISA.

As for the GM SBA titer, there were significant increases in IgG concentrations (as determined by ELISA) 1 month following vaccination among the three groups in the study (P < 0.0001). Subjects naïve to prior vaccination with the MACP vaccine had a 10-fold increase in the IgG concentration 1 month following vaccination. The GM IgG concentrations 1 month postvaccination were not significantly different among the three groups (P = 0.567) (Table 4).

Responders were identified as those subjects with SBA titers of 8. A significant increase in the percentage of responders was identified among the subjects naïve to vaccination (P = 0.002). The increase in the percentages of responders among the subjects vaccinated once before was not significant (P = 0.143), whereas among subjects previously vaccinated two or more times, the increases in the percentages of responders by use of cutoff levels of ≥8 and ≥32 were significant (P = 0.008 and 0.031, respectively) but not by use of a cutoff level of ≥128 (P = 0.523) (Table 4).

Data were also analyzed by age, gender, smoking status, and period since last vaccination. None of the four factors had a significant effect on differences in the responses to vaccination (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

This study has demonstrated a difference in the immune responses to serogroups A and C after repeated vaccination with the meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine in Saudi residents aged 10 to 29 years.

This is the first published report of a study measuring the functional antibody response to demonstrate an increase in the titer of SBA to the serogroup A polysaccharide following repeated polysaccharide vaccination in individuals in this age group. Postvaccination, the serogroup A GM SBA titer in subjects who had previously received two or more doses of polysaccharide vaccine was higher than the titer in those receiving it for the first time (P = 0.042). The number of responders (SBA titer, ≥8) increased from 69% in the naïve group to 100% in the postvaccination group after at least two doses. Serogroup A-specific GM IgG concentrations also increased following vaccination. The highest IgG concentration 1 month after vaccination was detected among those who had been vaccinated two or more times.

The results of this study support those of other studies (15, 17, 26) that have indicated that repeated doses of serogroup A meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine induce sustained levels of antibody to the serogroup A polysaccharide. However, the three previous studies (15, 17, 26) showed an induction of the immune response to serogroup A only by ELISA. Conversely, two studies (10, 29) demonstrated immunologic hyporesponsiveness to repeated vaccination with the serogroup A meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine. Those two studies measured both IgG concentrations (by ELISA) and SBA titers (10, 29).

Despite the use of bactericidal antibody assays together with the IgG concentration measurements, the conflicting results between this study and the two previous studies (10, 29) are obvious. The variation in results could be related to a number of different factors. First, the population sample size used in this study is much larger than those used in the previous two studies. Second, the populations used in the previous two studies were from different countries: Gambia (29) and the United Kingdom (10). Also, the Gambian study (29) recruited children aged 5 years during a vaccination campaign after an outbreak of serogroup A meningococcal disease. Those children had previously received two doses of the vaccine at the ages of 3 to 6 months and 18 to 24 months, respectively. The study conducted in the United Kingdom (10) recruited university students aged 18 to 25 years who had been vaccinated only once 6 months earlier as part of preventive measures taken after an outbreak. It is clear that the populations selected in this study were different in several aspects, such as the ages compared to the ages of the subjects evaluated in the Gambian study (children) and the time since the last vaccination compared to that in the study conducted in the United Kingdom. Third, the vaccine given in the United Kingdom and Gambia (Pasteur Merieux) was produced by a company different from that which produced the vaccine used in the present study (GlaxoSmithKline). Finally, and most importantly, in this study the subjects were local residents of Makkah and Jeddah, where the rate of natural exposure could have been similar to that for Gambian children but completely different from that for the subjects evaluated in the United Kingdom, where serogroup A is very rarely reported. Furthermore, the subjects in the present study were potentially exposed to serogroup A and W135 meningococci during the Hajj 2000 outbreak, when both serogroups were isolated from case patients (28).

Avidity indices have previously been used to investigate the maturation of long-lived B cells following vaccination with meningococcal serogroup A and C polysaccharide and conjugate vaccines (9, 24, 25, 36). Antibody avidity, the strength with which a multivalent antibody binds to a complex antigen, increases over time following primary immunization with a T-cell-dependent antigen but decreases following immunization with T-cell-independent antigens. Joseph et al. (25) demonstrated that following serogroup A polysaccharide immunization the avidity indices remained significantly above the prevaccination levels 1 year following vaccination among children 2 to 3 years of age, whereas after serogroup C polysaccharide vaccination, the avidity indices declined significantly postvaccination among children (9). These findings also indicate that the serogroup A polysaccharide may not be behaving as a classical T-cell-independent antigen.

The proportions of putative responders postvaccination with the serogroup C polysaccharide were 81% for the naïve group and 48% for those who had received one prior polysaccharide vaccine. As shown in previously published studies, repeated doses of polysaccharide vaccine resulted in immune hyporesponsiveness (19, 27, 29, 37).

Repeated vaccination with the serogroup A and C polysaccharide vaccine gives reduced functional antibody responses to the serogroup C portion of the vaccine but increased responses to the serogroup A portion of the vaccine among residents of the cities of Makkah and Jeddah in Saudi Arabia aged 10 to 29 years. The reasons for this difference in response are unclear, but other bacterial polysaccharides have been reported to act in a T-cell-dependent fashion (34).

Use of the conjugate vaccine should be considered for long-term protection against serogroup C disease. However, other serogroups (A, Y, and W135) will continue to cause problems, and trials with the quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine have commenced (11, 35). Once it is licensed, use of the quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine in Saudi Arabia will provide long-term protection and will be more cost-effective.

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants who took part in the research, the phlebotomists who performed blood extractions, and the laboratory technicians who isolated the serum.

We thank the University of Umm Al-Qura, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, for funding the research.

Written informed consent was obtained for all participants in this study. Ethical approval was obtained from the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Health; the Umm Al-Qura University of Makkah, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; the Public Health Laboratory Service, Colindale, London, United Kingdom; and Manchester University, Manchester, United Kingdom.

The trial was conducted according to International Committee for Harmonization Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and with appropriate quality assurance.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Al-Gahtani, Y. M., H. E. El-Bushra, S. M. Al-Qarawi, A. A. Al-Zubaidi, and R. E. Fontaine. 1995. Epidemiological investigation of an outbreak of meningococcal meningitis in Makkah (Mecca), Saudi Arabia. Epidemiol. Infect. 115:399-409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Al-Salman, S., and H. E. El-Bushra. 1998. Meningitis in Makkah, January-April 1997. Saudi Epidemiol. Bull. 5:2-7. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Andrews, N., R. Borrow, and E. Miller. 2003. Validation of serological correlate of protection for meningococcal C conjugate vaccine using efficacy estimates from postlicensure surveillance in England. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 10:780-786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anonymous. 1997. Annual health report. Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • 5.Anonymous. 1998. Health conditions for travellers to Saudi Arabia. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 73:4-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anonymous. 2002. Meningococcal vaccines: polysaccharide and polysaccharide conjugate vaccines. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 77:331-339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Artenstein, M., R. Gold, J. Zimmerly, F. A. Wyle, H. Schneider, and C. Harkins. 1970. Prevention of meningococcal disease by group C polysaccharide vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 282:417-420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Borrow, R., N. Andrews, D. Goldblatt, and E. Miller. 2001. Serological basis for use of meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccines in the United Kingdom: a reevaluation of correlates of protection. Infect. Immun. 69:1568-1573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Borrow, R., D. Goldblatt, N. Andrews, P. Richmond, J. Southern, and E. Miller. 2001. Influence of prior meningococcal C polysaccharide vaccine on the response and generation of memory following meningococcal C conjugate vaccine in young children. J. Infect. Dis. 184:377-380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Borrow, R., H. Joseph, N. Andrews, M. Acuna, E. Longworth, S. Martin, N. Peake, R. Rahim, P. Richmond, E. Kaczmarski, and E. Miller. 2001. Reduced antibody response to revaccination with meningococcal serogroup A polysaccharide vaccine in adults. Vaccine 19:1129-1132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Campbell, J. D., R. Edelman, J. C. King, Jr., T. Papa, R. Ryall, and M. B. Rennels. 2002. Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a tetravalent meningococcal polysaccharide-diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine given to healthy adults. J. Infect. Dis. 186:1848-1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Carlone, G. M., C. E. Frasch, G. R. Siber, S. Quataert, L. L. Gheesling, S. H. Turner, B. D. Plikaytis, L. O. Helsel, W. E. DeWitt, W. F. Bibb, B. Swaminathan, G. Arakere, C. Thompson, D. Phipps, D. Madore, and C. V. Broome. 1992. Multicentre comparison of levels of antibody to the Neisseria meningitidis group A capsular polysaccharide measured by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:154-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.De Oliveira, C. B., A. D. Taunay, T. A. De Cruz, and P. A Galvao. 1975. Meningococcal meningitis in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Bol. Oficina Saint Panam. 79:54-62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.De Wals, P., M. Dionne, M. Douville-Fradet, N. Boulianne, J. Drapeau, and G. De Serres. 1996. Impact of mass immunisation campaign against serogroup C meningococcus in the Province of Quebec, Canada. Bull. W. H. O. 74:407-411. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Erwa, H. H., M. A. Haseeb, A. A. Idris, L. Lapeyssonnie, W. R. Sanborn, and J. E. Sippel. 1973. A serogroup A meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine: studies in the Sudan to combat cerebrospinal meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis group A. Bull. W. H. O. 49:301-305. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gold, R., and M. Artenstein. 1971. Meningococcal infections. 2. Field trial of group C meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine in 1969-1970. Bull. W. H. O. 45:279-282. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gold, R., M. L. Lepow, I. Goldschneider, T. F. Draper, and E. C. Gotschlich. 1979. Kinetics of antibody production to group A and group C meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines administered during the first six years of life: prospects for routine immunization of infants and children. J. Infect. Dis. 140:690-697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gold, R., M. L. Lepow, I. Goldschneider, and E. C. Gotschlich. 1977. Immune response of human infants to polysaccharide vaccine of group A and C Neisseria meningitidis. J. Infect. Dis. 136(Suppl.):S31-S35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Granoff, D. M., R. K. Gupta, R. B. Belshe, and E. L. Anderson. 1998. Induction of immunologic refractoriness in adults by meningococcal C polysaccharide vaccination. J. Infect. Dis. 178:870-874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gray, S. J., R. Borrow, and E. B. Kaczmarski. 2001. Meningococcal serology. Methods Mol. Med. 67:61-87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Greenwood, B. M., M. Hassan-King, and H. C. Whittle. 1978. Prevention of secondary cases of meningococcal disease in household contacts by vaccination. BMJ i:1317-1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jamba, G., B. Bytchenko, G. Causse, B. Cvjetanovic, G. Ocirvan, N. Tsend, J. Kupul, S. Tseren, A. Batsuri, A. Hisigdorj, and V. Burian. 1979. Immunization during a cerebrospinal meningitis epidemic in the Mongolian People's Republic, 1974-75. Bull. W. H. O. 57:943-946. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jones, D. M., and E. M. Sutcliffe. 1990. Group A meningococcal disease in England associated with the Hajj. J. Infect. 21:21-25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Joseph, H., E. Miller, M. Dawson, N. Andrews, I. Feavers, and R. Borrow. 2001. Meningococcal serogroup A avidity indices as a surrogate marker of priming for the induction of immunological memory following vaccination with a meningococcal A/C conjugate vaccine in UK infants. J. Infect. Dis. 184:661-662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Joseph, H., R. Ryall, M. Bybel, T. Papa, J. MacLennan, J. Buttery, and R. Borrow. 2003. Immunogenicity and immunological priming of the serogroup A portion of a bivalent meningococcal A/C conjugate vaccine in 2-year-old children. J. Infect. Dis. 187:1142-1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Käyhty, H., V. Karanko, H. Peltola, S. Sarna, and P. H. Makela. 1980. Serum antibodies to capsular polysaccharide vaccine of group A Neisseria meningitidis followed for three years in infants and children. J. Infect. Dis. 142:861-868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Leach, A., P. A. Twumasi, S. Kumah, W. S. Banya, S. Jaffar, B. D. Forrest, D. M. Granoff, D. E. LiButti, G. M. Carlone, L. B. Pais, C. V. Broome, and B. M. Greenwood. 1997. Induction of immunologic memory in Gambian children by vaccination in infancy with a group A plus group C meningococcal polysaccharide protein conjugate vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 175:200-204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lingappa, J., A. M. Al-Rabeah, R. Haijeh, T. Mustafa, A. Fatani, T. Al-Bassam, A. Badukhan, A. M. Turkistani, N. Al-Hamdan, M. H. Al-Jeffri, Y. Al-Mazrou, B. A. Perkins, T. Popovic, L. W. Mayer, and N. E. Rosenstein. 2003. Serogroup W135 meningococcal disease during the Hajj. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9:665-671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.MacLennan, J., S. Obaro, J. Deeks, D. Williams, L. Pais, G. Carlone, R. Moxon, and B. Greenwood. 1999. Immune response to revaccination with meningococcal A and C polysaccharides in Gambian children following repeated immunisation during early childhood. Vaccine 17:3086-3093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maslanka, S. E., L. L. Gheesling, D. E. LiButti, K. B. J. Donaldson, H. S. Harakeh, J. K. Dykes, F. F. Arhin, S. J. N. Devi, C. E. Frasch, J. C. Huang, P. Kris-Kuzemenska, R. D. Lemmon, M. Lorange, C. C. A. M. Peeters, S. Quataert, J. Y. Tai, and G. M. Carlone. 1997. Standardization and a multilaboratory comparison of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A and C serum bactericidal assays. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 4:156-167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moore, P. S., L. H. Harrison, E. E. Telzak, G. W. Ajello, and C. V. Broome. 1988. Group A meningococcal carriage in travelers returning from Saudi Arabia. JAMA 260:2686-2689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Novelli, V. M., R. G. Lewis, and S. T. Dawood. 1987. Epidemic group A meningococcal disease in Haj pilgrims. Lancet ii:863-864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Peltola, H. 1978. Group A meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine and course of group A meningococcal epidemic in Finland. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 10:41-44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pozdnyakova, O., H. K. Guttormsen, F. N. Lalani, M. C. Carroll, and D. L. Kasper. 2003. Impaired antibody response to group B streptococcal type III capsular polysaccharide in C3- and complement receptor 2-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 170:84-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rennels, M., J. King, Jr., R. Ryall, S. Manoff, T. Papa, A. Weddle, and J. Froeschle. 2002. Dose escalation, safety and immunogenicity study of a tetravalent meninogococcal polysaccharide diphtheria conjugate vaccine in toddlers. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 21:978-979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Richmond, P., R. Borrow, D. Goldblatt, J. Findlow, S. Martin, R. Morris, K. Cartwright, and E. Miller. 2001. Ability of 3 different meningococcal C conjugate vaccines to induce immunologic memory after a single dose in UK toddlers. J. Infect. Dis. 183:160-163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Richmond, P., E. Kaczmarski, R. Borrow, J. Findlow, S. Clark, R. McCann, J. Hill, M. Barker, and E. Miller. 2000. Meningococcal C polysaccharide vaccine induces immunologic hyporesponsiveness in adults that is overcome by meningococcal C conjugate vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 181:761-764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Robbins, J. B., D. W. Towne, E. C. Gotschlich, and R. Schneerson. 1997. ‘Love's labours lost': failure to implement mass vaccination against group A meningococcal meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet 350:880-882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES