Abstract
Traditionally, ligands used in asymmetric catalysis have contained either stereogenic atoms or hindered single bonds (atropisomerism), or both. Here we demonstrate that allenes, chiral 1,2-dienes, appended with basic functionality can serve as ligands for transition metals. We describe an allene-containing bisphosphine that, when coordinated to Rh(I), promotes the asymmetric addition of aryl boronic acids to α-keto esters with high enantioselectivity. Solution and solid-state structural analysis reveals that one olefin of the allene can coordinate to transition metals generating bi- and tri-dentate ligands.
Stereochemistry is often critical to the function of small molecules. Their activity depends on their three-dimensional shape–a direct consequence of stereochemistry. Indeed, it is instructive that nearly all natural products and most new drugs are chiral1 and there is increasing pressure to manufacture chiral pharmaceuticals in optically active form.2 Accordingly, synthetic chemists seek to prepare these substances as single enantiomers to understand and exploit their structure and function. Among common approaches to control absolute stereochemistry, asymmetric catalysis offers significant advantages. These methods have been the subject of academic inquiry and industrial implementation.3 In particular, the last several decades have witnessed continued introduction and development of chiral ligands for transition metals.4 Future developments in asymmetric catalysis will likewise depend on the discovery of novel ligand scaffolds.
Most existing ligands for asymmetric catalysis are characterized by either of two types of chirality: some species owe their chirality to stereogenic atoms, usually tetrahedral carbon or phosphorus. Chiraphos (1, Fig 1) is a representative example. Many others are chiral by virtue of hindered rotation around a carbon-carbon single bond, exemplified by BINAP (2). Some of the most successful catalysts, such as the phosphoramidite 3, combine the elements of both central and axial chirality.5 Planar chirality (e.g. 46) and spiro-type axial chirality (e.g. 5)7 have been exploited in asymmetric catalysis, although less frequently.
Figure 1.
Central, axial and planar stereochemistry in asymmetric catalysis
Allenes can be chiral, but have never been incorporated into ligands involved in asymmetric catalysis. Soai’s group demonstrated that optically active disubstituted allenes could induce asymmetry in the addition of diisopropyl zinc to pyrimidine carboxaldehyde.8 This unique system combines a strong non-linear effect and auto-catalysis, and so neither the nature nor the extent of asymmetric induction by the allene is clear.9 In pioneering work, Krause and coworkers reported allene-containing ligands for silver, but catalysis, asymmetric or otherwise, was not reported.10 Our own efforts in this area led to the invention of bisphosphine oxide 6, which promotes the addition of SiCl4 to meso-epoxides with high enantioselectivity.11 We report here a new class of phosphine-containing allenes that serve as ligands for transition metals and enable asymmetric catalysis with rhodium. Furthermore, we describe crystallographic studies of the first optically active transition metal-allene complexes.
Allenes can be formed in the presence of, and are thus stable to, many main group12 and transition metals.13 Nonetheless, allenes are known to react with both electrophiles and nucleophiles, and they are prone to racemization by transition metals.14 For these reasons, we designed a synthesis of allene-containing phosphines (AllenePhos ligands) that offered flexibility in terms of the substituents on the allene and the identity of the phosphine (Scheme 1). For example, sulfoxide 7 was prepared as a single diastereomer by means of an acetylide addition to the corresponding ketone according to a protocol we recently disclosed.15 Subsequent acylation and propargylic substitution with a dialkyl cuprate provided the allene 9. Lithiation of both the sulfoxide and aryl bromide moieties followed by trapping with a chlorodiarylphosphine yielded the bisphosphine 10. Recrystallization from hexanes provided AllenePhos 10 in optically pure form.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis and structures of allene-containing ligands.
The synthesis of several related ligands was attempted, but not all attempts were successful. For example, the use of electron-withdrawing groups on the phosphine proved critical for the stability of the resulting ligand. Trapping with chlorodiphenyl phosphine was successful, but bisphosphine 11a immediately oxidized to the bisphosphine oxide 11b upon exposure to air. This sensitivity is surprising given that triphenyl phosphine is quite stable to ambient oxygen, and steric hindrance tends to impede oxidation.16 Likewise, diphenylallene 12 was inaccessible because the trapping with chlorodiarylphosphines failed. Products were isolated that had the desired molecular weight, but were too polar. A clue to the structure of this product was provided by the attempted synthesis of 13 and 14. In these cases, the phosphines were obtained, but displayed no optical activity. We hypothesized that reversible cyclization to zwitterion 19 allowed rotation around the C-C single bond and consequent racemization.17 Thus, in the case of phenyl-substituted bisphosphine 12, the zwitterion appears more stable than the allene, and was likely what we isolated instead of the desired ligand.
We reasoned that the stereochemical integrity of 10 arose from the steric environment around the allene. This congestion may prevent addition to the allene and may prevent rotation of the resultant zwitterion (i.e. 19) even if addition occurs. Accordingly, we prepared optically active monophosphines 15 and 16 possessing bulky tert-butyl and ortho-substituted phenyl rings on one side of the allene. Additionally, we synthesized the diastereomeric sulfoxides 17 and the unfunctionalized allene 18.18
We were interested in the coordination properties of the Al-lenePhos class of ligands. Thus, bisphosphine 10 and Rh(CH2=CH2)2(acac) (acac = acetylacetonato) were combined in CH2Cl2; single crystals of Rh(10)(acac) were deposited upon slow evaporation of a pentane solution. X-ray analysis revealed that 10 acts as a tridentate ligand (Fig 2) with both phosphorus atoms and the less hindered olefin coordinating to a Rh(I) center. The acac ligand completes a very distorted trigonal bipyramidal coordination sphere (P-Rh-P angle = 147°). In effect, the allene ligand adopts a helical conformation, wrapped around the Rh center. Coordination to the olefin bends the allene substantially (C-C-C angle = 148°), but the π-systems of the allene remain nearly orthogonal. The solid-state structure appears to be maintained in solution since 31P NMR revealed a 2JP-P coupling (442 Hz) consistent with trans-chelation to Rh.19 Likewise, the complex formed from AllenePhos 10 and [Rh(CH2=CH2)Cl]2, the optimal Rh source for the asymmetric addition,20 displayed nearly identical 31P chemical shifts and P-P and P-Rh couplings.18
Figure 2.

Structures of Rh(acac)10. a. X-ray crystal structure. Two molecules of pentane and disorder in one -CF3 group have been removed for clarity. b. X-ray crystal structure highlighting key contacts between ligands and Rh. Colors: P: orange; O: red; F: green; Rh: purple; allene highlighted in blue. Images generated with UCSF Chimera. c. Line drawing.
AllenePhos ligands form stable complexes with several other transition metals. For example, monophosphine 14 coordinated with a 1:1 stoichiometry with both Ag(I) and Pt(II). Interestingly, Ag(TFA)(14) features little interaction between the silver ion and the allene, and the allene remains nearly linear (C-C-C angle = 179°; Fig 3a). In contrast to silver, PtCl2 forms a square planar complex through interaction with both the phosphorus and allene functionalities (Fig 3b). Consequently, the allene shows substantial bending, with a C-C-C bond angle of 152°. The allene is coordinated approximately perpendicular to the coordination plane of Pt. Finally, PtCl2 was found to react with bisphosphine 10 via the elimination of HCl and the formation of a C-Pt covalent bond (Fig 3c). Allenes have been observed in the coordination sphere of transition metals in a variety of contexts. Complexes of Au21, Os22, Mn23, W24, and Co25 are known that involve direct binding of an allene to a transition metal. Furthermore, allene-containing phosphines have been characterized as ligands for Fe26 and Os.27 However, this study is the first to demonstrate that optically active allenes can coordinate to transition metals and maintain their stereochemical integrity. These observations suggested they might represent effective ligands for asymmetric catalysis.
Figure 3.
(AllenePhos)M complexes. X-ray structures of complexes formed between AllenePhos ligands and Ag(I) and Pt(II). Colors as in Fig 2. a. Ag-Callene distances: 325 pm and 339 pm. P-Ag-O angle: 164°. C-C-Callene angle: 179°. b. Pt-Callene distances: 221 pm and 209 pm. C-C-C allene angle: 152°. Images generated with UCSF Chimera.
For our initial studies we focused on the addition of aryl boronic acids to α-ketoesters (Table 1).28 This transformation provides synthetically valuable tertiary alcohols in a direct and atom economical way using air-stable nucleophilic reagents. Furthermore, the generation of quaternary stereocenters remains an ongoing challenge in organic synthesis.29 Previous work from the Zhou group revealed encouraging asymmetric induction using a phosphite ligand.30 Thus, we examined the addition of methoxy-phenyl boronic acid (21a) to benzyl ester 20a in the presence of various allene-containing ligands. Bisphosphine 10 gave the most promising reactivity and stereoselectivity. We evaluated several Rh:ligand ratios and observed no effect of excess ligand (Entry 1 vs. 2) and a small decrease in selectivity and reaction rate in the presence of excess Rh (Entry 1 vs. 3). Taken together, these data suggest that a 1:1 Rh:bisphosphine ratio is optimal, although precise control of this ratio is not necessary. The monophosphines 15 and 16 proved much less selective. Interestingly, ligand 15, in which the phosphine is distal to the tert-butyl group, generated a more active catalyst than 16, in which the phosphine is proximal to the tert-butyl group (entries 4 vs. 5). Likewise, the diastereomeric sulfoxides both promoted the addition, but with little asymmetry (entries 6–7).34 Finally, unfunctionalized allene 18 did not form an active complex with Rh, (entry 8). Additional optimization demonstrated that cyclohexyl esters performed better than either smaller (entry 1 vs. 9) or larger (entry 9 vs. 11) groups, allowing the isolation of the tertiary alcohol in nearly quantitative yield and >90% ee. Lower reaction temperatures provided a slight increase in ee but lengthened the reaction time.
Table 1.
Enantioselective Rhodium(I)-Catalyzed Addition of Arylboronic Acids to α-Ketoesters: Evaluation of ligands, solvents and esters
![]() | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entrya | R | Ligand | Rh:Lb | Time (h) | Yield (%)c | ee (%)d |
| 1 | Bn (20a) | 10 | 1:1 | 12 | 80 | 83 |
| 2 | Bn | 10 | 1:2 | 12 | 85 | 82 |
| 3 | Bn | 10 | 2:1 | 20 | 83 | 76 |
| 4 | Bn | 15e | 1:1 | 1 | 82 | 20 |
| 5 | Bn | 16 | 1:1 | 40 | 38 | 26 |
| 6 | Bn | 17a | 1:1 | 40 | 81 | 15 |
| 7 | Bn | 17b | 1:1 | 40 | 74 | 13 |
| 8 | Bn | 18 | 1:1 | 40 | 1 | <5 |
| 9 | Cy (20b) | 10 | 1:1 | 12 | 95 | 91 |
| 10f | Cy | 10 | 1:1 | 20 | 94 | 92 |
| 11 | iPr (20c) | 10 | 1:1 | 24 | 82 | 86 |
| 12 | Ad (20d) | 10 | 1:1 | 24 | 49 | 80 |
Conditions: 0.06 mmol 20, 0.12 mmol 21a, 0.1 M under N2 atmosphere.
Rh:Ligand ratio.
Isolated yields.
Determined by HPLC.
Ligand 15 approximately 75% ee.
Reaction at 4 °C.
Several α-ketoesters were subjected to the optimized reaction conditions in the presence of AllenePhos 10 (Table 2). In general, the additions are faster and more enantioselective with electron deficient α-ketoesters. For example, a cyano-substituted ketone reacted completely with 21a within 6 h (91% ee, entry 10) while a methyl-substituted ketone required 48 h and reacted less selectively (84% ee, entry 17). The opposite trend is observed with the aryl boronic acid component: electron rich arylboronic acids react more quickly than electron deficient ones (table 2, entry 1 vs. 2; 21 vs. 22), although the enantioselectivities are similar. An electron rich α-ketoester and an electron deficient arylboronic acid react inefficiently, even at elevated temperature (entry 20). However, the same product can be accessed by reversing the components and using an electron-rich boronic acid and electron-deficient α-ketoester (entry 21). While meta- and para- substitution on the α-ketoester are tolerated under the standard conditions, ortho substitution necessitated elevated temperatures to obtain high yields. Fortunately, high enantioselectivity was observed even at 40 °C. (Table 2, entry 25). The reaction was similar on a small scale and on a multi-millimole scale (Table 2, entry 1). Hindered arylboronic acids do not perform well in the reaction.
Table 2.
Enantioselective Rhodium(I)-Catalyzed Addition of Boronic Acids to α-Ketoesters: Reaction Scope
![]() | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entrya | R | ![]() |
Time (h) | Yield (%)b | ee (%)c |
| 1d | H | 4-MeO-C6H4 | 12 | 90 | 91 |
| 2 | H | 4-Ph-C6H4 | 60 | 88 | 88 |
| 3 | H | 2-Napht | 60 | 74 | 87 |
| 4 | 3,5-(CF3)2- | 4-MeO-C6H4 | 6 | 90 | 79 |
| 5 | 3,5-(CF3)2- | Ph | 6 | 89 | 91 |
| 6 | 3,5-(CF3)2- | 4-Ph-C6H4 | 6 | 94 | 89 |
| 7 | 3,5-(CF3)2- | 2-Napht | 6 | 90 | 90 |
| 8 | 3,5-(CF3)2- | 3-MeO-C6H4 | 6 | 87 | 91 |
| 9 | 3,5-(CF3)2- | 4-Cl-C6H 4 | 6 | 80 | 91 |
| 10 | 4-CN | 4-MeO-C6H4 | 6 | 95 | 91 |
| 11 | 4-CN | Ph | 6 | 81 | 95 |
| 12 | 4-CN | 4-Ph-C6H4 | 6 | 88 | 93 |
| 13 | 4-CN | 2-Napht | 6 | 87 | 92 |
| 14 | 4-CN | 3-MeO-C6H4 | 6 | 93 | 94 |
| 15 | 4-F | 4-Ph-C6H4 | 48 | 77 | 92 |
| 16 | 4-F | 2-Napht | 48 | 73 | 83 |
| 17 | 4-Me | 4-MeO-C6H4 | 48 | 81 | 84 |
| 18 | 4-Me | 4-Ph-C6H4 | 72 | 58 | 87 |
| 19 | 4-MeO | 4-Me2N-C6H4 | 20 | 98 | 83 |
| 20e | 4-MeO | 4-Cl-Ph | 72 | 37 | 80 |
| 21 | 4-Cl | 4-MeO-C6H4 | 12 | 97 | 90 |
| 22 | 4-Cl | 4-Ph-C6H4 | 24 | 87 | 90 |
| 23 | 3-Cl | 4-MeO-C6H4 | 16 | 98 | 93 |
| 24 | 3-Cl | 2-Napht | 40 | 97 | 86 |
| 25e | 2-Cl | 4-MeO-C6H4 | 72 | 84 | 92 |
| 26 | 2-CF3 | 4-MeO-C6H4 | 72 | 52 | 90 |
| 27 | H |
|
19 | 87 | 67 |
| 28f | H | 21b | 72 | 75 | 71 |
| 29 | 4-F | 21b | 24 | 88 | 69 |
| 30 | 4-CN | 21b | 2 | 84 | 65 |
| 31 | 4-CN |
|
36 | 75 | 87 |
| 32 | 4-Cl | 21c | 36 | 78 | 85 |
| 33 | H | 21c | 36 | 68 | 76 |
| 34 | 4-Me | 21c | 36 | 41 | 48 |
Conditions: 0.06 mmol 20, 0.12 mmol 21, 0.1 M under N2 atmosphere unless otherwise noted.
Isolated yields.
Determined by HPLC.
2.6 mmol 20, 5.2 mmol 21.
Reaction at 40 °C.
Reaction at −20 °C.
Vinylboronic acids can also participate in the addition (Table 2, entries 27–34). High reactivity and moderate enantioselectivity were observed with a trans-disubstituted vinylboronic acid (entry 27). Lower temperature provided slight increases in optical purity. The more hindered α-substituted vinyl boronic acid gave good ee with electron deficient α-ketoesters (entries 31, 32), but lower ee with more electron rich α-ketoesters (entries 33, 34).
Several conclusions can be drawn from these studies. First, substantial steric bulk around the allene appears necessary to ensure chemical and stereochemical integrity. Even though transition metals can racemize allenes14, bisphosphine 10 retains optical activity in the presence of Rh(I), Ag(I) and even cationic Au(I). Thus it appears that significant opportunities for catalysis exist.
Second, all of the solid-state structures we have obtained contain a π-stacking interaction between two aryl rings on opposite termini of the allene. This interaction does not require CF3 groups because we previously observed it in the crystal structure of 6, which lacks CF3 groups.11 We speculate that this characteristic may provide rigidity around the large coordination sphere and may be beneficial to asymmetric induction.
Third, we observed an interaction between Rh and Pt with the allene itself. In the case of Pt, this interaction is sufficiently activating that, in the presence of a second phosphine, elimination of HCl destroys the allene and forms a C-Pt bond. However, in the case of Rh, the interaction may be important for both catalysis and asymmetric induction. It is noteworthy that in the solid state, coordination only to the less hindered olefin (methyl-substituted) is observed. Furthermore, a comparison between monophosphines 15 and 16 is intriguing. Ligand 15 should allow coordination to the less hindered olefin, and the Rh complex derived from this ligand is very active (Table 1, entry 4). In contrast, ligand 16 contains a more hindered olefin proximal to the phosphine; it is much less active (Table 1 entry 5). Finally, coordination to the allene in bisphosphine 10 may encourage the formation of a trans-chelating complex. Consequently, the Rh center is buried within a deep chiral cavity. Only a limited number of trans-chelating bis-phosphines have been developed for asymmetric catalysis44 so additional members of this class should be valuable. The utility of these ligands is sure to be expanded by continued developments in ligand design and the exploration of additional chemical reactions.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Funding was provided by the NIH (GM074822), NSF (CAREER) and Welch Foundation (I1612). J.M.R. is a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Molecular images were produced using the UCSF Chimera package from the University of California, San Francisco (supported by NIH P41 RR001081). Johnson-Matthey generously provided Rh salts.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, characterization data, and crystal structure files.
References
- 1.Rouhi AM. Chem & Eng News. 2004;82:47. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Farina V, Reeves JT, Senanayake CH, Song J. J Chem Rev. 2006;106:2734. doi: 10.1021/cr040700c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jacobsen EN, Pfaltz A, Yamamoto H, editors. Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Examples of ligand development: (a) Cyclopropanation: Pellissier H. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:7041.Hydrogenation: Tang W, Zhang X. Chem Rev. 2003;103:3029. doi: 10.1021/cr020049i.Addition to aldehydes: Binder CM, Singaram B. Org Prep Proced Int. 2011;43:139.
- 5.Feringa BL. Accts Chem Res. 2000;33:346. doi: 10.1021/ar990084k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Halterman RL. Chem Rev. 1992;92:965. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fu Y, Xie J-H, Hu A-G, Zhou H, Wang L-X, Zhou Q-L. Chem Commun. 2002:480. doi: 10.1039/b109827f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sato I, Matsueda Y, Kadowaki K, Yonekubo S, Shibata T, Soai K. Helv Chim Acta. 2002;85:3383. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kawasaki T, Sato M, Ishiguro S, Saito T, Morishita Y, Sato I, Nishino H, Inoue Y, Soai K. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:3274. doi: 10.1021/ja0422108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Löhr S, Averbeck J, Schürmann M, Krause N. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2008;2008:552. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pu X, Qi X, Ready JM. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:10364. doi: 10.1021/ja9041127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Al: Claesson A, Olsson LI. J Am Chem Soc. 1979;101:7302.RLi and RMgCl: Satoh T, Kuramochi Y, Inoue Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:8815.
- 13.Zr: Pu X, Ready JM. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:10874. doi: 10.1021/ja8035527.Cu: Lipshutz BH, Sengupta S. Organic Reactions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; West Sussex: 2004. Pd: Yoshida M, Gotou T, Ihara M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:5573.Au: Sherry BD, Toste FD. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:15978. doi: 10.1021/ja044602k.Fe: Li CY, Wang XB, Sun XL, Tang Y, Xu ZH, Zhou YG, Dai LX. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:1494. doi: 10.1021/ja068642v.Zn: Varghese JP, Zouev I, Aufauvre L, Knochel P, Marek I. Eur J Org Chem. 2002:4151.Cr: Molander GA, Sommers EM. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:2345.Ti: Buchwald SL, Grubbs RH. J Am Chem Soc. 1983;105:5490.Schlossarczyk H, Sieber W, Hesse M, Hansen HJ, Schmid H. Helv Chim Acta. 1973;56:875.
- 14.(a) Molander GA, Sommers EM, Baker SR. J Org Chem. 2006;71:1563. doi: 10.1021/jo052201x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang Z, Bender CF, Widenhoefer RA. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:14148. doi: 10.1021/ja0760731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Gandon V, Lemière G, Hours A, Fensterbank L, Malacria M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:7534. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Antczak MI, Cai F, Ready JM. Org Lett. 2010;13:184. doi: 10.1021/ol102567h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barder TE, Buchwald SL. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:5096. doi: 10.1021/ja0683180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lithiation did not cause racemization.
- 18.See supporting information for details.
- 19.Duan W-L, Iwamura H, Shintani R, Hayashi T. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:2130. doi: 10.1021/ja0671013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.The catalyst derived from Rh(CH2=CH2)2(acac) and 10 catalyzes the reaction in Table 2, entry 4 in 68% yield and 81% ee after 15 h at 40 °C.
- 21.Brown TJ, Sugie A, Dickens MG, Widenhoefer RA. Organometallics. 2010;29:4207. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Castro-Rodrigo R, Esteruelas MA, Lopez AM, Mozo S, Onate E. Organometallics. 2010;29:4071. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sentets S, Serres R, Ortin Y, Lugan N, Lavigne G. Organometallics. 2008;27:2078. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee L, Wu I-Y, Lin Y-C, Lee G-H, Wang Y. Organometallics. 1994;13:2521. [Google Scholar]
- 25.O’Connor JM, Chen M-C, Fong BS, Wenzel A, Gantzel P, Rheingold AL, Guzei IA. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:1100. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Doherty S, Elsegood MRJ, Clegg W, Mampe D, Rees NH. Organometallics. 1996;15:5302. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang H, Lin R, Hong G, Wang T, Wen TB, Xia H. Chem Eur J. 2010;16:6999. doi: 10.1002/chem.201000324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sakai M, Ueda M, Miyaura N. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1998;37:3279. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981217)37:23<3279::AID-ANIE3279>3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.(a) Corey EJ, Guzman-Perez A. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1998;37:389. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980302)37:4<388::AID-ANIE388>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Bella M, Gasperi T. Synthesis. 2009:1583. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Duan HF, Xie JH, Qiao XC, Wang LX, Zhou QL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4351. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bürgi JJ, Mariz R, Gatti M, Drinkel E, Luan X, Blumentritt S, Linden A, Dorta R. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:2768. doi: 10.1002/anie.200900429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Freixa Z, van Leeuwen PWNM. Coord Chem Rev. 2008;252:1755. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






