Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 23;118(20):5583–5592. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-343467

Table 3.

Comparative characteristics of patients with cytogenetic aberrations in MSCs, patients with a normal MSC karyotype, and a control group of healthy donors

MSCs with aberrations (n = 15) MSCs with normal karyotype (n = 79) Healthy donors (n = 36)
Median age, y (range) 59 (26-83) 62 (19-84) 48 (21-86)
Sex, male/female ratio 10/5 59/20 17/19
MSC culture time, median (range) 30 (23-49) 34 (18-76) 33 (22-57)
Number of MSC passages, median (range) 4 (3-5) 4 (3-8) 4 (3-8)
s-AML, n (%) 5 (50%)* 14 (34%)*
Cytogenetic aberrations in HCs, n (%) 8 (53%)* 33 (42%)*
Unfavorable prognostic genetic and cytogenetic aberrations in HCs, n (%) 8 (53%) 15 (19%)
Overall mortality, n (%) 9 (60%) 23 (29%)
Leukemia-related mortality, n (%) 4 (44%) 6 (26%)

Statistical analysis was performed using Student t test and unpaired 2-sided exact Fisher test. Unfavorable prognostic genetic and cytogenetic aberrations are complex aberrations (3 or more aberrations pro metaphase), monosomy 5 or 7, del(5q) in AML patients, t(11;19)(q11;p13.1), and FLT3 mutation.2 Other abbreviations are explained in Table 1.

*

Not significant.

P < .05.