Skip to main content
Annual Proceedings / Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine logoLink to Annual Proceedings / Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine
. 2004;48:265–284.

Pedestrian and Pedalcyclist Injury Costs in the United States by Age and Injury Severity

Ted R Miller 1, Eduard Zaloshnja 1, Bruce A Lawrence 1, Jeff Crandall 2, Johan Ivarsson 2, A Eric Finkelstein 3
PMCID: PMC3217422  PMID: 15319130

Abstract

This paper estimates the incidence, unit costs, and annual costs of pedestrian and pedalcycle crash injuries in the United States. It includes medical care costs, household and wage work losses, and the value of pain, suffering, and lost quality of life. The estimates are broken down by body region and severity. They rely heavily on data from the health care system. Costs of pedestrian and pedalcycle injuries in 2000 will total $40 billion over the lifetimes of the injured. Most pedalcyclist injury costs and half of pedestrian injury costs do not involve motor vehicles. Youth ages 5–14 face greater annual risks when walking or driving their own pedaled vehicles than when being driven. Children under age 5 experience higher costs than their elders when injured as pedestrians. Our results suggest European and Japanese component tests used to design pedestrian injury countermeasures for motor vehicles are too narrow. Separate lower limb testing is needed for younger children. Testing for torso/vertebral column injury of adults also seems desirable.


Europe and Japan currently evaluate vehicle designs using tests on vehicle components. Europe has three testing organizations with separate test procedures: the European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee (EEVC), the European New Car Assessment Program, and a voluntary agreement with vehicle manufacturers. Manufacturers are designing pedestrian injury countermeasures based on the component tests. The tests focus on several body regions (head, pelvis/proximal lower limb, and leg). For the head, impacts on both child and adult pedestrians are tested and equal weighting is given to each in terms of determining a score for the vehicle. For the other body regions, only the adult impact is tested.

The countermeasures are being developed based on injury frequency without examining basic data on severity that might dictate a focus on different occupant sizes or body regions. The young and elderly are over-represented in the pedestrian fatality statistics. More importantly, stature, and consequently age, has a strong influence on the child injury patterns (Woods et al. 2003). Data are needed to inform decisions about the age profile and priority body regions to use in future component testing.

This paper has two related objectives. First, it estimates the economic burden of pedestrian and pedalcyclist injuries in the United States and the extent of motor vehicle involvement by age group. These estimates support an assessment of how pedestrian and pedalcyclist injury severity vary by age group. Second, it provides total and unit costs to support interpretation of test results used to evaluate vehicle designs and other interventions aimed at reducing pedestrian and pedalcyclist injury. By providing finely differentiated costs, it facilitates vehicle design tradeoffs, for example, between bumpers and vehicle front-ends designed to be especially friendly to young pedestrians versus bicyclists versus elderly pedestrians.

Past analyses of pedestrian and pedalcycle injury costs typically were minor features of broader studies. Miller et al. (1999) included costs per mile bicycled in comparing safety across transport modes. Miller et al. (2000) considered these mechanisms in analyzing the leading causes of childhood injury costs. Miller et al. (1997), Wang et al. (1999), and Zaloshnja et al. (2004) all included non-occupant crashes in computing crash costs by crash type. Miller et al. (1998) estimated the costs of crashes involving alcohol-impaired non-occupants. Finally, Miller et al. (1994) and Miller and Levy (1998) computed costs of children’s bicycle-related head and face injuries in performing benefit-cost analyses of child bicycle helmets.

This research report is the first to focus primarily on pedestrian and pedalcyclist (non-occupant) injury costs. With that narrow focus, we are able to examine the body region and severity distribution of non-occupant injury and its variation with victim age and motor vehicle involvement. Such attention is warranted since the non-occupant injury problem accounts for an estimated 14% of annual US highway crash costs (Miller et al. 1999).

Data scarcity proved a major challenge for this study. U.S. transportation data sets are inadequate to estimate incidence or describe the injuries accurately enough to cost them. Pedalcycle injury not involving motor vehicles or not on public roads (e.g., in driveways) is outside the scope of National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) files. Moreover, although NHTSA’s General Estimates System and Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) estimate the number of non-occupant deaths and injuries involving motor vehicles on public roads, they do not routinely collect sufficient diagnostic detail on these non-occupant injuries to cost them. Thus, we could not analyze the details of non-occupant injury using established crash costing data and methods. Instead, we used a variety of health care data sets that included cause and diagnosis codes for injury incidents.

METHODS

We modeled total injury costs by multiplying the estimated incidence of injury times estimated unit costs of injury. Because we derived incidence from health care data bases, our estimates are differentiated between fatal injuries and non-fatal injuries by highest level of medical treatment (hospital admission, emergency department (ED) without admission, physician’s office without admission or ED care, or hospital outpatient department only).

INCIDENCE AND SEVERITY ESTIMATION

We estimated the number and cost of pedalcyclist and pedestrian injuries, with and without motor vehicle involvement. For comparison purposes, we also made estimates for motor vehicle occupant injury.

Our incidence estimates are early results from a broader injury cost project. Fatal injury counts came from the 2000 National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) fatality census (National Center for Health Statistics – NCHS – 2004a), with supplemental information about on-the-road crash deaths from the FARS census of deaths involving motor vehicles on public roads. We used the 2000 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project – Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) data file to estimate hospitalized nonfatal injury episodes. HCUP-2000 contains data on 8 million inpatient stays from 1,000 hospitals (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality – AHRQ 2004a). We removed readmissions from the HCUP-NIS counts using readmission rates by primary diagnosis group derived from pooled 1997–1998 hospital discharge census data for Maryland, Vermont, and New Jersey – a choice driven by necessity; no other readily accessible data exist about readmission rates. HCUP-NIS identifies causes for 83% of injury incidents. Under the assumption that these cases were representative, we inferred missing external cause codes by applying the cause distribution by age group, gender, and primary diagnosis for cases with known cause.

We estimated injuries treated in the ED from the 1999–2000 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), which surveys a representative sample of 500 EDs (NCHS 2004b). We estimated the number of injuries resulting in medical treatment without hospitalization or ED treatment from parallel provider surveys in the NHAMCS family, the 1999–2000 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the 1999–2000 NHAMCS hospital outpatient department sample (NCHS 2004b).

NHAMCS and NAMCS detail injury cause and diagnoses but count visits, not incidents. Thus, NAMCS might report three office visits that resulted from a single pedestrian injury. To estimate incident counts, we compared these data with data from data sets that counted incidents but had other faults that precluded their use as the primary incidence data sets. Excluding those who died or were hospitalized, we compared the NHAMCS ED visit counts to ED-treated injury incidence from the 2001 National Electronic Injury Surveillance System – All Injury Program (AIP, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control 2004). This nationally representative sample of newly injured patients treated in EDs does not code where non-occupant injuries occurred. The comparison revealed the AIP incidence and NHAMCS ED visit counts agree to within 2.5%, suggesting the NHAMCS ED counts are sound incidence estimates.

We compared the other visit counts with incidence and visit counts by broad cause from the 1999 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS, AHRQ 2004b). MEPS tracks all health care for a national sample of non-institutionalized residents over a 2-year period but does not record whether motor vehicle injury victims were vehicle occupants. The comparison confirmed that the other data sets include many follow-up visits. We reduced the NHAMCS and NAMCS visit counts to match the MEPS victim counts within each age category (0–4, 5–14, 15–24, 25–44, 45–64, 65–74, 75+) and gender strata. We first removed NHAMCS and NAMCS cases within each strata where cause information was missing or coded as ‘unspecified’ (approximately 19% of cases from each file). Next, within the seven broad cause categories in MEPS (including motor vehicle), we multiplied the weights of all remaining visits within each strata times the ratio of the MEPS victim count to the NHAMCS or NAMCS visit count. This procedure reduced the weighted NHAMCS and NAMCS counts by age group, gender and broad cause so that they matched the corresponding MEPS incidence estimates. Depending on data set, causes are unspecified for 2%–5% of the NHAMCS/NAMCS cases and another 2%–6% involve motor vehicles but do not indicate if the patient was an occupant. Conservatively, we assumed none of these patients were pedestrians or pedalcyclists.

Abbreviated Injury Severity (AIS) scores (AAAM 1990) measure the threat to life resulting from an injury. The scores run from 0 (none) to 6 (unsurvivable). AIS scores and body regions were assigned using ICDmap-90 software (Johns Hopkins University & Tri-Analytics Inc. 1997). ICDmap-90 uses artificial intelligence and input from injury coding experts to translate (“map”) International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD9-CM, NCHS 1990) diagnosis codes into AIS scores. For some injuries, this software is unable to determine the AIS level definitively from just an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code and gives a range of possible AIS scores instead. For any given diagnosis, we assumed that hospital-admitted cases, being the most severe cases, would have the highest AIS severity score in the range and the less severe non-admitted cases would have the lowest AIS score in the range. Once each of the patient’s injuries was assigned an AIS score, we defined the injury with the highest AIS as the patient’s primary diagnosis and assigned this injury’s AIS score as the patient’s Maximum AIS (MAIS) and its body region as the patient’s body region. If two or more injuries had the highest AIS, we assigned the primary diagnosis as the first of these diagnoses listed in the discharge record.

The non-admitted cases are coded in ICD9 without the fifth digit of the clinical modification, which means they unavoidably are missing a body region identifier for some diagnoses, notably contusions and abrasions. These and a few other cases could not be AIS-scored; they were assigned scores of “9” denoting missing.

Diagnoses in mortality records are coded in the 10th Edition of the ICD (ICD10), not ICD9-CM. NCHS does not assign a primary injury diagnosis or require recording of a diagnosis on death certificates for injury (and none is entered for 36% of pedalcyclist and 53% of pedestrian deaths). ICDmap-90 cannot assign a body region to ICD10 data. NCHS supplied us with an unpublished mapping of ICD10 diagnoses to body regions (Lois Fingerhut, personal communication with Ted Miller, 2004) which we applied to the injury diagnoses. Following NCHS advice, we treated all diagnoses on the death certificate as contributing causes. To get an unduplicated death count by body region, we weighted each diagnosis by 1/n, where n is the number of diagnoses for the decedent. By convention, all deaths were assigned an AIS score of 6.

COST ESTIMATION

We estimated lifetime costs that result from a fatal or nonfatal injury. The costs fit into three categories: (1) medical, (2) work loss, and (3) quality of life. Following Gold et al. (1996), we discounted future costs to present value at a 3% discount rate and defined costs from a societal perspective that includes all costs – costs to victims, families, government, insurers, and taxpayers. Estimates were price-adjusted to 2000 dollars using the Employment Cost Index and Consumer Price Indices by medical care component (e.g., hospital).

MEDICAL COSTS

By diagnosis group, we used HCUP-NIS charge data adjusted with cost-to-charge ratios developed for use with HCUP-NIS by AHRQ, data from MEDSTAT’s MarketScan database on the ratio of professional fee payments to hospital payments, inpatient rehabilitation cost estimates from Miller et al. (2004), 1999 National Nursing Home Survey data on nursing home payments for patients who were discharged to nursing homes according to HCUP/NIS, and MEPS data (five interviews over a two-year period) about other post-discharge costs. Combining these estimates, we derived 18-month medical costs for injuries resulting in hospitalizations with live discharges. We used MEPS data to quantify 18-month unit medical costs for injuries not requiring a hospitalizetion. To compute lifetime costs, we divided the estimates by the percentage of lifetime medical costs that occur in the first 18 months by diagnosis group and whether hospital-admitted. The lifetime percentages were computed from 1979–1988 National Council on Compensation Insurance Detailed Claims Information (DCI) data on more than 450,000 injury victims (Miller et al. 1995). More recent data on this percentage were not available. The DCI and MEPS showed similar percentages of costs in months 0–6 versus 7–18, which suggests the aged DCI percentages are reasonably accurate.

For fatalities, we obtained the distribution of place of injury death by cause and age group from 2000 NVSS data. We computed costs separately for six different places of death (death-on-scene, death-on-arrival to the hospital, death at the emergency department, death at the hospital after inpatient admission, death at home, and death at a nursing home). The medical costs incurred, depending on place of death, include coroner/medical examiner, emergency and/or non-emergency medical transport, emergency department treatment, inpatient hospitalization, and nursing home care.

WORK LOSS AND QUALITY OF LIFE LOSS

Work loss and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) loss per injury by diagnosis and age/gender adapt published estimates (Zaloshnja et al. 2001, Miller et al. 1998) by substituting a refined cost per day of household work lost from Haddix et al. (2003). As the original papers detail, the work loss days are built from 1993 Bureau of Labor Statistics data on days lost per injury with work loss; 1986–1992 National Health Interview Survey data on the probability an injury to an employed person will cause work loss; and DCI data on the percentage of injuries that result in permanent total and permanent partial disability, as well as the percentage of earning power lost for partial disabilities.

QALYs measure lost quality of life. The estimated QALY losses come from published sources (Miller 1993, Miller et al. 1995). They are based on expert judgment of typical functional losses to a specific injury over time plus the work loss data The functional and work losses are converted to QALY losses with survey-based values drawn from a systematic review of the literature (Miller et al. 1995).

Monetizing QALYs is controversial because it assumes that the monetary value per QALY is constant across the lifespan and that proportionate values for different health states are independent of income (e.g., that people of all income levels value the mobility loss from needing a walker at half the loss from needing a wheelchair). It also requires using a value of fatal risk reduction from one of several meta-analyses on the amount people routinely pay or are willing to pay in the expectation of saving one statistical life, but the meta-analyses disagree about this value. Following Zaloshnja et al. (2004), we monetize QALYs using the value of $3.4 million per statistical life (in 2000 dollars) from Miller (1990) that is incorporated into regulatory analyses throughout the US Department of Transportation.

The vehicle and highway design and regulatory analysis communities generally use monetized QALYs, while the public health community favors unmonetized QALY estimates for health service research applications. For compactness, we provide only Zaloshnja et al.’s (2001) monetized QALY estimates here. To obtain unmonetized QALYs, divide the monetized estimates by $98,851.

RESULTS

INCIDENCE

Table 1 shows that 6,106 pedestrians and 866 pedalcyclists were fatally injured in the United States in 2000, including motor vehicle crash victims and pedalcyclists and pedestrians who suffered fatal injury without motor vehicle involvement. An estimated 198,000 more pedestrian injury victims and 638,000 more pedalcyclist injury victims received medical treatment away from the scene annually in 1999–2000. Pedestrian injuries were more likely to be fatal or result in hospitalization than pedalcyclist injuries. Peak incidence rates for pedestrian injuries occur at ages 5–9, followed by 2–4 and 10–14. Although pedestrian injury incidence rates at ages 65 and over are lower than for other age groups except 0–1, the elderly have the highest fatal and hospitalized incidence rates. For pedal-cyclist injuries, peak incidence is at ages 5–14, followed by 15–19.

Table 1.

Annual incidence and rate of pedestrian and pedalcyclist injury by severity and age group, United States, 2000

Age Fatal Admitted Non-admitted Total Rate/100,000 people
PEDESTRIANS INJURED
0–1 102 275 119 495 7
2–4 191 1,279 9,071 10,542 93
5–9 230 2,712 23,808 26,750 135
10–14 207 2,312 15,075 17,595 88
15–19 346 2,587 7,708 10,642 54
20–49 2,707 12,456 82,609 97,772 81
50–64 997 3,991 24,429 29,417 71
65–74 522 2,011 1,629 4,161 12
75+ 804 2,504 3,685 6,993 42
Total 6,106 30,128 168,133 204,367 70
% 3% 15% 82% 100%
PEDALCYCLISTS INJURED
0–1 - 93 2,013 2,106 28
2–4 5 620 16,988 17,612 156
5–9 66 3,378 165,772 169,216 855
10–14 125 4,765 159,037 163,927 823
15–19 68 2,749 73,080 75,896 381
20–49 356 8,720 170,146 179,221 148
50–64 138 2,884 6,814 9,836 24
65+ 108 1,856 19,714 21,678 62
Total 866 25,063 613,563 639,492 219
% 0.1% 4% 96% 100%

COSTS

The estimated lifetime cost of pedestrian and pedal-cyclist injuries in the US in 2000 is $40.4 billion (Table 2). To put the non-occupant injury problem in context, it costs 17.7% as much as motor vehicle occupant injuries. Pedalcyclist injuries account for 6.4% (1.6% + 4.8%) of the lifetime costs and pedestrian injuries for 11.4% (2.2% + 9.2%). In the 5–9 age group, the cost for pedestrian and pedalcyclist injuries ($5.0 billion) far exceeds the cost of motor vehicle occupant injuries ($3 billion). In the 10–14 age group the costs are similar − $5.0 billion and $4.9 billion, respectively. In both of these age groups, injuries to pedalcyclists not involved in motor vehicle crashes were the main culprit behind these high costs.

Table 2.

Total lifetime costs of pedestrian, pedalcyclist, and motor vehicle injuries (in millions of dollars) and their percentage contributions, by age group, United States, 2000

Age Pedalcycle, Motor Vehicle % of Row Pedestrian, Motor Vehicle % of Row Motor Vehicle Occupant % of Row Pedalcycle, No Motor Vehicle % of Row Pedestrian, No Motor Vehicle % of Row Total % of Row
0–1 4 0.2% 231 13.6% 1,178 69.3% 33 1.9% 255 15.0% 1,701 100%
2–4 41 0.9% 286 6.5% 2,815 63.6% 367 8.3% 917 20.7% 4,426 100%
5–9 425 5.0% 236 2.8% 3,469 40.9% 2,735 32.3% 1,613 19.0% 8,478 100%
10–14 752 7.6% 224 2.3% 4,865 49.4% 2,588 26.3% 1,425 14.5% 9,854 100%
15–19 431 1.2% 488 1.4% 31,402 89.0% 1,262 3.6% 1,689 4.8% 35,272 100%
20–49 1,585 1.2% 2,667 2.0% 116,664 86.4% 3,130 2.3% 10,962 8.1% 135,008 100%
50–64 292 1.4% 503 2.3% 17,518 81.4% 576 2.7% 2,638 12.3% 21,527 100%
65–74 61 0.9% 153 2.3% 5,562 83.0% 177 2.6% 747 11.1% 6,700 100%
75+ 34 0.7% 113 2.5% 3,680 80.5% 98 2.1% 644 14.1% 4,569 100%
All 3,625 1.6% 4,901 2.2% 187,153 82.3% 10,966 4.8% 20,890 9.2% 227,535 100%

Table 3 breaks down the estimated costs by cost component and the patient’s MAIS injury severity. The largest contributor to pedestrian and pedalcyclist injury costs (62.8%) is the $24.7 billion value of pain, suffering, and lost quality of life. Productivity -- wage and household work – losses are $12.1 billion (30.8%) and medical costs are $2.5 billion (6.4%). Fatalities account for half the costs, and MAIS-2 injuries for another quarter. Pedestrian-motor vehicle injuries have the highest cost per case ($135,558), followed by pedestrian-no motor vehicle ($96,098), pedalcycle motor-vehicle ($58,188), and pedalcycle-no motor vehicle ($17,831). The differences result in part from higher average MAIS. Incidents involving motor vehicles also cause a more costly mix of injuries within a MAIS level.

Table 3.

Incidence, total lifetime costs and cost per case by cause of injury, cost category, and MAIS, 2000 dollars (total costs in millions)

MAIS Cases Medical cost Lost productivity Monetized QALYs Comprehensive cost Cost per Case
Pedestrian – Motor Vehicle
1 84,835 127 220 32 378 $ 4,460
2 47,028 290 872 1,751 2,913 61,932
3 7,558 265 377 1,392 2,034 269,143
4 2,548 312 185 563 1,060 415,976
5 690 157 156 234 547 791,751
Fatal 4,821 53 4,490 9,246 13,789 2,860,162
9 6,022 17 62 9 88 14,618
All 153,503 1,221 6,360 13,227 20,809 135,558
Pedestrian – No Motor Vehicle
1 36,112 35 50 8 93 $ 2,566
2 7,568 31 92 216 338 44,726
3 5,518 30 111 232 372 67,445
4 233 21 15 54 91 389,288
5 54 7 4 17 27 499,096
Fatal 1,285 7 1,333 2,620 3,960 3,081,647
9 94 1 5 1 7 74,806
All 50,864 132 1,610 3,146 4,888 96,098
Pedalcyclist – Motor Vehicle
1 42,947 53 89 13 155 $ 3,612
2 2,837 46 50 362 458 161,339
3 1,434 46 27 317 390 272,263
4 789 64 15 196 275 348,061
5 189 31 21 70 122 643,720
Fatal 697 7 675 1,148 1,830 2,625,024
9 7,359 13 26 4 44 5,945
All 56,252 259 904 2,111 3,273 58,188
Pedalcyclist – No Motor Vehicle
1 331,139 314 766 117 1,196 $ 3,611
2 209,971 359 1,748 4,239 6,346 30,222
3 4,020 67 206 993 1,266 314,935
4 1,650 82 131 424 637 385,975
5 330 26 24 107 157 476,779
Fatal 169 4 166 335 505 2,988,456
9 35,962 58 204 31 293 8,160
All 583,240 909 3,244 6,247 10,400 17,831
Total
1 495,033 528 1,125 169 1,822 $ 3,681
2 267,404 726 2,761 6,567 10,054 37,600
3 18,530 408 720 2,934 4,063 219,256
4 5,220 480 346 1,236 2,062 395,035
5 1,264 220 204 429 853 674,856
Fatal 6,972 70 6,664 13,349 20,083 2,880,587
9 49,437 89 298 45 432 8,744
All 843,859 2,521 12,118 24,731 39,370 46,654
6.4% 30.8% 62.8% 100.0%

MAIS 9 = MAIS not codable from the diagnoses provided

Table 4 shows costs for injuries with motor vehicle involvement by age group and MAIS. The variation in costs per fatality by age group in this (and other) tables primarily results from differences in expected remaining lifespan and work life. Fatality costs strongly influence the cost per victim across all injury severities. Overall, for example, costs average $153,503 per pedestrian killed or injured but just $47,280 per survivor (numbers not tabulated). For pedalcyclists, the comparable numbers are $64,425 and $32,300. Clearly, average MAIS is lower for pedalcyclists than for pedestrians at all ages. Elderly pedalcyclists have higher MAIS scores. Average MAIS varies modestly for other age groups. Average costs per victim (including both survivors and those who die) and per survivor are high at ages 0–4 and 15–19, as well as for pedalcyclists over age 64. Estimated mean costs per pedestrian-motor vehicle injury for adults ages 20–64 and ages 65 and over, however, are virtually identical.

Table 4.

Incidence and lifetime cost of injuries to pedestrians and pedalcyclists caused by collision with motor vehicles in transport, by age and MAIS, in 2000 dollars (total costs in millions)

Pedestrian – MVT Pedalcyclist – MVT

Age MAIS Cases Cost per victim Total cost Cases Cost per victim Total cost
0–4 1 3,019 6,306 19 23 67,925 1.6
2 691 305,666 211 54 402,644 22
3 208 412,887 86 10 140,749 1
4 133 525,019 70 17 404,780 7
5 21 585,014 12 0 593,630 0.2
Fatal 189 4,031,904 762 4 3,498,997 13
9 60 83,693 5 3 101,629 0.3
All 4,321 269,590 1,165 111 401,914 45

5–9 1 7,117 5,521 39 6,235 2,367 15
2 3,279 145,440 477 368 349,642 129
3 453 360,458 163 124 324,608 40
4 187 475,075 89 90 454,264 41
5 57 531,752 30 19 577,308 11
Fatal 197 4,065,236 802 54 3,464,123 188
9 75 113,113 8 12 102,334 1.3
All 11,365 141,552 1,609 6,903 61,499 425

10–14 1 8,272 3,651 30 6,917 3,941 27
2 5,398 61,488 332 455 241,541 110
3 515 411,892 212 229 382,506 87
4 198 471,506 93 187 446,196 83
5 48 682,737 33 41 774,077 32
Fatal 171 4,125,467 707 106 3,514,188 372
9 2,690 7,504 20 7,220 5,577 40
All 17,292 82,546 1,427 15,154 49,612 752

15–19 1 3,449 8,805 30 2,818 7,962 22
2 2,599 76,440 199 346 221,805 77
3 600 347,807 209 177 373,791 66
4 214 505,591 108 118 442,625 52
5 90 1,100,039 99 39 596,350 23
Fatal 245 4,182,970 1,025 53 3,539,503 187
9 88 102,422 9 20 127,385 2.6
All 7,285 230,455 1,679 3,571 120,694 431

20–64 1 57,215 4,246 243 26,930 5,016 135
2 33,534 46,991 1,576 1,477 166,595 246
3 4,468 274,881 1,228 764 325,485 249
4 1,436 434,681 624 330 418,753 138
5 387 902,089 349 70 1,137,955 80
Fatal 2,925 3,242,629 9,486 407 2,507,127 1,020
9 3,019 13,962 42 85 108,557 9
All 102,984 131,558 13,548 30,063 62,442 1,877

65+ 1 5,763 2,892 17 23 13,687 0.3
2 1,527 78,688 120 138 86,857 12
3 1,315 110,692 146 130 140,126 18
4 380 203,260 77 48 201,227 10
5 88 239,716 21 20 237,990 5
Fatal 1,093 921,919 1,008 73 673,952 49
9 91 21,518 2 18 33,522 0.6
All 10,256 135,563 1,390 450 210,897 95

MAIS 9 = MAIS not codable from the diagnoses available

Table 5 breaks down the pedalcyclist injury costs by age group, body region, and MAIS. Costs per patient vary dramatically, averaging $19,521 for pedalcyclists under 15 and $56,198 for older pedalcyclists. These differences are driven by costs, not incidence. Pedalcyclists ages 0–14 have lower average costs of MAIS 1 TBI, MAIS 2–5 TBI, and MAIS 2–5 other head/neck injuries ($5,558 vs. $10,431, $60,505 vs. $139,891, and $11,473 vs. $21,819) but higher average costs of MAIS 2–5 upper extremity and lower extremity injuries ($38,794 vs. $24,686 and $290,550 vs. $59,839). (Tables 57 do not sum to the totals in prior tables because they exclude estimates with small case counts.)

Table 5.

Total lifetime cost of injuries to pedalcyclists by age group, body region, MAIS, and cost category, in millions of 2000 dollars

Body region MAIS Cases Medical cost Lost productivity Monetized QALYs Comprehensive cost
Ages 0–14
Traumatic brain 1 8,292 12.9 28.7 4.5 46
2–5 17,346 70.5 230.6 748.4 1,050
Fatal 115 2.1 155.1 325.4 483
9 5,035 8.2 23.6 3.7 36
Other head/neck 1 80,517 59.6 295.7 46.1 401
2–6 9,282 9.4 53.1 60.6 123
9 668 1.0 1.5 0.3 3
Spinal cord. 2–6 16 4.4 5.5 12.1 22
Vert. Col. 1 7,544 10.6 15.0 2.6 28
2–6 38 0.3 5.4 7.9 14
Torso 1 5,244 5.5 11.8 1.8 19
2–5 1,079 14.3 20.8 419.0 454
Fatal 16 0.2 22.1 45.7 68
9 4,512 5.8 20.8 3.3 30
Upper extremity 1 27,360 23.3 21.4 3.5 48
2–5 71,444 96.8 690.3 1,984.4 2,772
Lower extremity 1 44,266 40.1 47.8 7.8 96
2–6 2,282 29.2 120.9 514.6 665
Other/unspecified 1 47,185 35.0 59.5 10.2 105
Fatal 56 0.6 76.1 157.3 234
9 20,248 34.8 131.4 20.7 187
TOTAL All 352,853 464.6 2,039.4 4,384.0 6,888
Ages 15 and over
Traumatic brain 1 3,530 6.8 26.2 3.8 37
2–5 8,714 162.8 280.7 775.6 1,219
Fatal 277 4.6 295.7 528.2 829
9 132 2.1 14.6 2.0 19
Other head/neck 1 30,276 26.5 84.8 12.0 123
2–5 11,829 30.8 55.3 172.0 258
Fatal 34 0.2 36.3 64.4 101
9 34 0.5 2.5 0.3 3
Spinal cord. 2–5 145 34.1 42.4 91.1 168
Fatal 8 0.2 7.6 14.6 22
9 5 0.1 1.9 0.3 2
Vert. Col. 1 69 0.7 3.2 0.4 4
2–6 471 8.5 30.0 16.8 55
Torso 1 17,714 22.2 91.9 12.9 127
2–5 2,122 26.5 62.7 398.1 487
Fatal 75 0.7 79.0 142.9 223
9 130 0.8 2.2 0.3 3
Upper 1 45,822 66.4 104.5 14.5 185
2–6 63,401 120.4 600.7 850.0 1,571
Lower extremity 1 32,915 35.3 52.7 7.5 96
2–5 18,074 104.9 289.1 687.5 1,082
Fatal 9 0.2 8.8 16.4 25
9 1,486 2.2 5.4 0.7 8
Other/unspecified 1 23,346 21.6 52.1 7.6 81
2–5 14,690 8.1 10.3 19.8 38
Fatal 252 2.0 259.9 478.6 741
9 11,007 14.4 35.2 5.0 55
System wide Fatal 9 0.1 11.4 20.0 32
9 44 0.8 1.5 0.2 3
TOTAL All 286,630 704.7 2,548.7 4,343.8 7,597

MAIS 9 = MAIS not codable from the diagnoses available. Total includes small cells that were not shown separately. Cells with less than 5 fatalities were combined with MAIS 2-5 cells into MAIS 2–6.

Table 7.

Cost of injuries to pedestrians ages 15 and over in motor vehicle crashes, by body region, MAIS, and cost category, in millions of 2000 dollars

Body region MAIS Cases Medical cost Lost productivity Monetized QALYs Comprehensive cost
Traumatic brain 1 1,527 4.4 23.2 3.2 30.9
2–5 3,792 375.9 318.2 837.2 1,531.2
Fatal 1,082 15.7 1,023.4 2,010.5 3,049.6
9 154 2.4 15.3 2.1 19.9

Other head/neck 1 2,936 6.9 26.5 3.7 37.1
2–5 1,932 8.0 17.5 30.9 56.5
Fatal 116 0.8 111.7 221.8 334.4
9 17 0.1 1.5 0.2 1.9

Spinal cord 1 5 0.2 1.8 0.2 2.2
2–5 150 31.7 58.2 117.8 207.7
Fatal 18 0.1 17.4 33.9 51.5
9 12 0.4 4.4 0.6 5.4

Vertebral column 1 5,285 8.7 18.9 2.6 30.2
2–5 6,650 18.8 49.4 27.0 95.2
Fatal 31 0.2 30.2 57.8 88.2

Torso 1 2,153 4.7 12.9 1.8 19.4
2–5 2,708 82.7 100.5 362.2 545.5
Fatal 574 5.5 492.6 995.9 1,494.1
9 143 1.3 3.4 0.5 5.1

Upper extremity 1 15,352 21.7 23.4 3.3 48.4
2–5 13,634 48.1 152.3 242.0 442.4
Fatal 7 0.1 4.0 9.9 14.0
9 23 0.2 1.4 0.2 1.7

Lower extremity 1 16,451 27.3 28.7 4.1 60.1
2–5 17,745 299.0 571.5 1,004.2 1,874.7
Fatal 83 1.6 57.6 125.4 184.6
9 1,799 3.6 9.3 1.4 14.2

Other/unspecified 1 22,719 30.3 27.5 4.0 61.8
2–5 26 0.3 1.5 1.0 2.8
Fatal 2,324 22.3 2,073.8 4,122.6 6,218.7
9 973 1.5 4.0 0.5 6.0

Systemic Fatal 29 0.3 28.2 55.0 83.5
9 75 2.8 1.6 2.5 6.9

TOTAL All 120,525 1,028 5,312 10,286 16,626

Per Case All 8,528 44,073 85,344 137,945

MAIS 9 = not codable from the diagnoses available.

Tables 6 and 7 provide breakdowns similar to Table 5 for pedestrian injuries in motor vehicle crashes. Vertebral column injuries are rare under age 15 but an estimated 10% of injuries and 1.8% of injury costs at older ages. MAIS 2–5 and fatal torso injuries rank third in total costs behind TBI and lower extremity injuries; they account for 19% of costs of injuries with body region known (13% under age 15 and 20% above that). Estimated costs per patient do not differ greatly under and over age 15 ($126,985 vs. $137,945). Younger pedestrians experience many more MAIS 1 lower extremity injuries (34.5% vs. 13.6% of cases) and have higher costs per injury for MAIS 1 TBIs ($111,480 vs. $20,215), MAIS 1 and 2–5 other head/neck injuries ($36,882 and $127,828 vs. $12,622 and $29,239), and MAIS 2–5 lower extremity injuries ($322,830 ages 0–4 vs. $168,871 ages 5–14 vs. $105,650 ages 15 and over).

Table 6.

Cost of injuries to pedestrians ages 0–14 in motor vehicle crashes, by body region, MAIS, and cost category, in millions of 2000 dollars

Body region MAIS Cases Medical cost Lost productivity Monetized QALYs Comprehensive cost
Traumatic brain 1 170 1.4 15.3 2.3 19.0
2–5 1,298 76.9 107.2 407.9 592.0
Fatal 267 3.2 312.5 773.5 1,089.2
9 131 1.1 12.6 1.9 15.7

Other head/neck 1 833 3.9 23.2 3.6 30.7
2–5 136 1.8 5.3 10.2 17.3
Fatal 19 0.2 21.2 55.1 76.4
9 7 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.8

Vert. Col. 1 11 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.8
2–5 39 0.6 2.8 1.2 4.6
Fatal 2 0.0 2.5 6.8 9.3

Torso 1 71 0.3 2.0 0.3 2.6
2–5 571 11.6 19.7 172.2 203.5
Fatal 53 0.5 61.3 152.6 214.4
9 25 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.9

Upper extremity 1 4,329 3.5 3.4 0.5 7.4
2–5 4,699 13.0 45.2 96.4 154.6
Fatal 1 0.0 1.6 3.6 5.2
9 644 0.9 1.5 0.2 2.6

Lower extremity 1 11,388 10.7 11.0 1.8 23.5
2–5 4,434 54.9 140.8 625.9 821.7
Fatal 3 0.1 3.9 9.2 13.2
9 19 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.8

Other/unspecified 1 1,607 2.5 2.2 0.3 5.0
2–5 11 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.6
Fatal 212 2.1 248.2 612.3 862.5
9 1,997 3.3 8.4 1.3 13.0

TOTAL All 32,976 193 1,055 2,940 4,187

Per Case All 5,852 31,983 89,149 126,985

MAIS 9 = MAIS not codable from the diagnoses available.

DISCUSSION

It is impossible to calculate the variance in our estimates, because we have no information about the uncertainty introduced by assumptions. Nevertheless, in comparing the estimates in our tables between categories, differences probably need to be fairly large to be statistically significant. Considering only variance due to injury mix and sampling error, Zaloshnja et al. (2004) estimate the variance of crash costs in much less homogeneous categories than the ones shown here, arriving at estimates equal to 10%–15% of the mean for crashes involving non-occupants providing there are at least 100 raw observations. Considering a broader range of contributors to the variance, Miller and Blincoe (1994) suggest it could be as much as 40% of the mean. Our conservative assumptions make it more likely that we underestimate than overestimate total costs.

IMPLICATIONS

The numbers in Tables 57 are useful for countermeasure evaluation and interpretation of data from biomechanical testing. They also help to define problem size. For example, the frequent and severe upper and lower extremity injuries of young pedalcyclists relative to older ones merits investigation.

Bicycle helmets are effective against TBI and to a lesser extent, other head and face injury. Such injuries account for $1.6 billion in annual costs among the 0–14 year olds targeted by mandatory bicycle helmet usage laws and for $2.1 billion among those aged 15 and over who the laws do not cover. The higher costs per TBI or other head injury among bicyclists age 15 and over may result from greater bicycle helmet use at younger ages. These numbers need to be interpreted in the context of contemporaneous bicycle miles traveled and helmet usage rates by age group. A benefit-cost analysis of helmets for adults also seems desirable. Child pedestrians have much more costly MAIS 2–5 lower limb injuries than adults, suggesting the need for child-specific lower limb component testing. Our findings affirm the value of separate head injury testing for child pedestrians and of targeting the head and lower limb. Testing addressing adult torso/vertebral column injury of adults also seems desirable. The very close match in estimated cost per pedestrian injury among older adults and other adults suggests that separate component testing to account for the higher prevalence of osteoporosis in the elderly is unnecessary.

Henary et al. (2003) found that child pedestrians hit by motor vehicles sustained less severe injuries than their adult counterparts. Their analysis focused on police-reported injury severity. With the substantially more accurate MAIS and cost scales, the story changes. MAIS 1 injuries are, indeed, more common among young children than adults, but the injury mix within AIS levels is quite different. Children under age 5 and ages 15–19 have higher costs per injury for MAIS 1 injuries, much higher costs for MAIS 2 injuries (with torso, upper extremity, and lower extremity injuries the reasons), and experience far more costly injuries overall.

LIMITATIONS

These estimates exclude many factors included in most motor vehicle crash costs (e.g., the costs in Zaloshnja et al. 2004, Miller, Lestina, and Spicer 1998, Miller 1993). Among them are mental health costs, legal and court costs, administrative costs of insurance claims processing, police and fire services costs, travel delay costs, and disruption costs to employers of the injured and their families.

The legal and administrative costs are the largest omission. NHTSA’s General Estimates System data for 1998–2000 indicate that nationally 12.7% of pedestrian injuries and 8.9% of pedalcyclist injuries in motor vehicle crashes are hit and run. Medical costs, work loss, and even some quality of life loss typically will be compensated except in the hit and run cases, resulting in additional costs. Auto insurance claims processing will raise medical and work loss costs of compensated cases by 18.3% (with a maximum of $27,000, given the average policy limit of $148,000) and legal and court costs will raise them by another 25.1% (with a maximum of $185,700, given the average court award of $740,000 for catastrophic injuries) (Zaloshnja et al. 2001). For cases without motor vehicle involvement and hit and run cases, medical insurance claims processing will average 7.46% (Zaloshnja et al. 2001). In aggregate, then, legal and administrative costs would total an estimated $1.9 billion for pedestrian-motor vehicle injuries, $0.35 billion for pedalcycle-motor vehicle injuries, and a modest $0.08 billion for cases not involving motor vehicles.

Records on motor vehicle crash injuries treated in physician’s offices often did not indicate if patients were drivers, passengers, or non-occupants. We assumed all were occupants. Allocating these patients in proportion to motor vehicle patients with details known would raise pedestrian and pedalcyclist injury costs by $0.3 billion.

The cost differences by age in this paper arise primarily because of differences in diagnosis mix (e.g., the percentage of injuries that are TBIs, the percentage of TBIs that are skull fractures versus concussions), place of treatment, expected lifespan, and current earnings. For any given diagnosis, the unit medical costs for injuries without hospitalization, the days of work-related disability while recuperating, and the percentage of lifetime quality of life lost to the injury did not vary by age.

The Medicare cost-to-charge ratios that we applied in computing hospital costs averaged 51.7% of charges. Payments probably exceed these costs, so we underestimate total payments by an unknown amount. Our knowledge of costs more than two years post-injury is dated, and almost nothing is known about costs more than eight years post-injury. The work loss estimates come from data on working age people so they may not apply well to youth and the elderly. The national adjustment for hospital readmission relied on readmission data from only three states. Data from a larger sample of states would be desirable, but no other large public-use files identify readmissions. Diagnoses indicating body region injured were missing for more than 40% of the fatalities.

CONCLUSION

Costs of pedestrian and pedalcycle injuries in 2000 will total $40 billion over the lifetimes of the injured. Our findings suggest that age makes a difference in the cost and nature of injuries that pedestrians and pedalcyclists experience in motor vehicle crashes. Torso/vertebral column injury of adult pedestrians is an important problem ignored in component testing.

The large majority of pedalcyclist injury costs and about half of pedestrian injury costs do not involve motor vehicles. Efforts to prevent these injuries should address the range of hazards associated with these pedestrian and bicycle modes, not just the interactions with the highway environment. The incidence and total costs of pedestrian and pedalcyclist injuries without motor vehicles involved would be even greater if we included assaults and rapes on paths and trails and over-exertion and thermal injuries associated with running, walking, and cycling.

Pedalcyclist and pedestrian injury incidence and cost are high. They place a large burden on society. Youth ages 5–14 face greater risks when walking or driving their own pedalcycles than when adults transport them. The riskiness of under-15 usage of non-motorized transport raises questions about letting this age group drive motorized, typically speedier vehicles including all-terrain vehicles, dirt bikes, dune buggies, and snowmobiles.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Partial support for this research came from the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and from an auto manufacturer. Participating in the International Collaborative Effort on Injury Statistics, sponsored by NCHS with funding from the National Institute of Child Health and Development, also contributed critically to this research. Our thanks to Phaedra Corso, David Sleet, and Ann Dellinger of NCIPC for their very helpful comments on a draft. The paper represents the views of the authors but not necessarily of the funding agencies.

REFERENCES

  1. AAAM. The Abbreviated Injury Scale 1990. Des Plaines IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  2. AHRQ. NIS technical documentation. [accessed June 2004a]. http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/nis.htm.
  3. AHRQ. Medical expenditure panel survey. [accessed June 2004b]. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/
  4. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  5. Henary BY, Crandall J, Bhalla K, et al. Child and adult pedestrian impact: The influence of vehicle type on injury severity. 47th Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; Barrington IL, AAAM. 2003. pp. 105–126. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haddix AC, Teutsch SM, Corso PS, editors. Prevention effectiveness. 2. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  7. Johns Hopkins University, Tri-Analytics Inc. ICDMAP-90 Software User’s Guide. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller TR. The plausible range for the value of life: Red herrings among the mackerel. Journal of Forensic Economics. 1990;3(3):75–89. [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller TR. Costs and functional consequences of United States roadway crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 1993;25(5):593–607. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(93)90011-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller TR, Blincoe LJ. Incidence and cost of alcohol-involved crashes in the United States. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 1994;26(5):583–592. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)90020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Miller TR, Douglass JB, Galbraith MS, Lestina DC, Pindus NM. In: Costs of head and neck injury and a benefit-cost analysis of bicycle helmets, in Head and Neck Injury. Levine R, editor. Warrendale, PA: Society for Automotive Engineers; 1994. 1994. pp. 211–240. P-276. [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller TR, Langston EA, Lawrence BA, et al. Motorcycle injury rehabilitation cost, final report to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Calverton MD: PIRE; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller TR, Lawrence BA, Jensen A, Waehrer G, Spicer RS, Lestina DC, Cohen MA. Estimating the Cost to Society of Consumer Product Injuries: The Revised Injury Cost Model. Bethesda, MD: US Consumer Product Safety Commission; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  14. Miller TR, Levy DT. Reducing highway crash costs: The cost-outcome analyses. In: von Holst H, Nygren A, Andersson A, editors. Transportation, Traffic Safety, and Health. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institute; 1998. pp. 171–198. [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller TR, Lestina DC, Galbraith MS, et al. United States passenger-vehicle crashes by crash geometry: Direct costs and other losses, Accident Analysis and Prevention. 1997;29(3):343–352. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(96)00087-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Miller TR, Lestina DC, Spicer RS. Highway crash costs in the United States by driver age, blood, alcohol level, victim age, and restraint use. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 1998;30(2):137–150. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00093-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Miller TR, Pindus NM, Douglass JB, et al. Databook on Nonfatal Injury: Incidence, Costs, and Consequences. The Urban Institute Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller TR, Romano EO, Spicer RS. The cost of childhood unintentional injuries and the value of prevention. The Future of Children. 2000;10(1):137–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Miller TR, Spicer RS, Lestina DC, Levy DT. Is it safest to travel by bicycle, car, or big truck? Journal of Crash Prevention and Injury Control. 1999;1(1):25–34. [Google Scholar]
  20. NCHS. National Vital Statistics System home. [accessed June 2004a]. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss.htm.
  21. NCHS. NAMCS/NHAMCS home. [accessed June 2004b]. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/ahcd/ahcd1.htm.
  22. NCHS. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision: Clinical Modification. Hyattsville, Md: 1980. DHHS publication PHS 80–1260. [Google Scholar]
  23. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Data sources for WISQARS Nonfatal. [accessed June 2004]. http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars/nonfatal/datasources.htm.
  24. Wang JS, Knipling RR, Blincoe LJ. The dimensions of motor vehicle crash risk. Journal of Transportation and Statistics. 1999;2(1):19–43. [Google Scholar]
  25. Woods W, Sherwood C, Ivarsson J, et al. A review of pediatric pedestrian injuries at a Level 1 trauma center. Proceedings, 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, DOT HS 809 543; Washington DC, NHTSA. 2003. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zaloshnja E, Miller TR, Council F, Persaud B. Comprehesive and human capital crash costs by maximum police-reported injury severity within selected crash types. 48th Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; Oak Park IL: AAAM; 2004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zaloshnja E, Miller TR, Romano EO, Spicer RS. HARM 2000: Crash Cost and Consequence Data for the New Millennium. 45th Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; Oak Park IL: AAAM; 2001. pp. 159–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annual Proceedings / Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine are provided here courtesy of Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine

RESOURCES