Abstract
Introduction
Crohn's disease is a chronic condition of the gastrointestinal tract. It is characterised by transmural, granulomatous inflammation that occurs in a discontinuous pattern, with a tendency to form fistulae. The cause is unknown but may depend on interactions between genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, and mucosal immunity.
Methods and outcomes
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of medical treatments to induce remission in adults with Crohn's disease? What are the effects of surgical interventions to induce and maintain remission in adults with small-bowel Crohn's disease? What are the effects of surgical interventions to induce remission in adults with colonic Crohn's disease? What are the effects of medical interventions to maintain remission in adults with Crohn's disease; and to maintain remission following surgery? What are the effects of lifestyle interventions to maintain remission in adults with Crohn's disease? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to December 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
Results
We found 93 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria.
Conclusions
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: aminosalicylates, antibiotics, azathioprine/mercaptopurine, ciclosporin, corticosteroids (oral), enteral nutrition, fish oil, infliximab, methotrexate, probiotics, resection, segmental colectomy, smoking cessation, and strictureplasty.
Key Points
Crohn's disease is a chronic condition of the gastrointestinal tract.
It is characterised by transmural, granulomatous inflammation that occurs in a discontinuous pattern, with a tendency to form fistulae.
The cause is unknown but may depend on interactions between genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, and mucosal immunity.
First-line treatment to induce remission of acute disease is corticosteroids.
Budesonide is generally recommended in mild to moderate ileocaecal disease because it is only slightly less effective in inducing remission than prednisolone and has a superior adverse-effect profile.
Prednisolone or methylprednisolone are generally recommended for severe or more extensive disease because of their superior efficacy.
Azathioprine and mercaptopurine are effective in inducing remission and healing fistulae in Crohn's disease, provided that at least 17 weeks of treatment are given. Monitoring for myelosuppression is obligatory.
Aminosalicylates (mesalazine, sulfasalazine) may reduce disease activity, but we don't know which regimen is best to induce remission.
Methotrexate 25 mg weekly increases remission rates and has a corticosteroid-sparing effect. There is consensus that it is also effective for maintenance.
Infliximab (a cytokine inhibitor) is effective in inducing and maintaining remission in Crohn's disease, but the long-term adverse-effect profile is unclear; infliximab is therefore generally reserved for treatment of disease that is refractory to treatment with corticosteroids or other immunomodulators.
Antibiotics and ciclosporin are unlikely to be beneficial in inducing remission.
Bowel-sparing surgery to induce remission may be preferable to extensive resection, to avoid short-bowel syndrome. Segmental and sub-total colectomy have similar remission rates.
Laparoscopic resection may reduce postoperative hospital stay, but we don't know whether strictureplasty is effective.
Azathioprine has been shown to be beneficial in maintaining remission in Crohn's disease, either alone or after surgery, and has a corticosteroid-sparing effect, but it is associated with important adverse effects.
Ciclosporin, or oral corticosteroids, alone are unlikely to be beneficial in maintaining remission after medical treatment.
Methotrexate and infliximab may also maintain remission compared with placebo.
Smoking cessation reduces the risk of relapse, and enteral nutrition may be effective.
Fish oil and probiotics have not been shown to be effective.
Mesalazine seems effective in maintaining medically induced remission, but we don't know how effective other aminosalicylates are in maintaining remission.
Clinical context
About this condition
Definition
Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract, characterised by transmural granulomatous inflammation, a discontinuous pattern of distribution, and fistulae.[1] Although any part of the digestive tract from mouth to anus may be affected, Crohn's disease most frequently occurs in the terminal ileum, ileocaecal region, colon, and perianal region. The disease may be further classified into inflammatory, fistulating, and stricturing disease.[2] The symptoms vary but commonly include diarrhoea, abdominal pain, weight loss, blood or mucus in the stool, perineal pain, discharge, and irritation resulting from perianal fistulae. Extraintestinal manifestations of the disease include arthritis, uveitis, and skin rash.[3] Diagnosis: There is no single gold standard for the diagnosis of Crohn's disease. Diagnosis is made by clinical evaluation and a combination of endoscopic, histological, radiological, and biochemical investigations. Internationally accepted criteria for the diagnosis of Crohn's disease have been defined by Lennard-Jones.[4] After exclusion of infection, ischaemia, irradiation, and malignancy as causes for intestinal inflammation, a combination of 3 or more of the following findings on clinical examination, radiological investigation, endoscopy, and histological examination of endoscopic biopsies or excised specimens is considered diagnostic: chronic inflammatory lesions of the oral cavity, pylorus or duodenum, small bowel or anus; a discontinuous disease distribution (areas of abnormal mucosa separated by normal mucosa); transmural inflammation (fissuring ulcer, abscess, or fistula); fibrosis (stricture); lymphoid aggregates or aphthoid ulcers; retention of colonic mucin on biopsy in the presence of active inflammation; and granulomata (of the non-caseating type and not caused by foreign bodies). Further macroscopic findings not included in the Lennard-Jones classification that are considered diagnostic for Crohn's disease include fat wrapping, cobblestoning, and thickening of the intestinal wall. Laboratory findings consistent with Crohn's disease include anaemia, thrombocytosis, raised C-reactive protein levels, and a raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate.[3] It may be difficult to distinguish Crohn's disease from ulcerative colitis, particularly when only the colon is affected. In 10% to 15% of patients originally diagnosed as having Crohn's disease, the diagnosis changes to ulcerative colitis during the first year.[3]
Incidence/ Prevalence
Estimates of the incidence of Crohn's disease worldwide vary considerably. In Europe, incidence rates range from 0.7 (Croatia) to 9.8 (Scotland) new cases per 100,000 people per year, whereas in North America these range from 3.6 (California) to 15.6 (Manitoba, Canada). The incidence of Crohn's disease is increasing, with incidence rates in the UK, Italy, Iceland, Finland, and the USA having doubled between 1955 and 1995.[5] Crohn's disease is most commonly diagnosed in late adolescence and early adulthood, but the mean age at diagnosis in North American studies ranges from 33.4 to 45 years.[6] Crohn's disease appears to affect women more commonly than men. In a systematic review of North American cohort studies of Crohn's disease, the percentage of females affected by the disease varied from 48% to 66%, and was above 50% in 9 out of 11 studies.[6]
Aetiology/ Risk factors
The true aetiology of Crohn's disease remains unknown. Current aetiological theories suggest that the disease results from a genetic predisposition, regulatory defects in the gut mucosal immune system, and environmental triggers.[7] Defects in the gut mucosal immune system are mainly related to disordered activity of T cells (a type of white blood cell). Environmental triggers that have been linked with Crohn's disease include smoking, diet (high sugar intake), and the balance of beneficial and harmful bacteria in the gut.[5] Finally, debate has raged since Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis was cultured from intestinal tissue of people with Crohn's disease, with little agreement on whether this bacterium is an infective cause of Crohn's disease.[8]
Prognosis
Crohn's disease is a lifelong condition, with periods of active disease alternating with periods of remission. The disease causes significant disability, with only 75% of sufferers being fully capable of work in the year of diagnosis, and 15% of people unable to work after 5 to 10 years of disease.[2] At least 50% of people with Crohn's disease require surgical treatment during the first 10 years of disease, and approximately 70% to 80% will require surgery during their lifetime.[9] People with Crohn's disease are at higher risk than those without the disease of developing colorectal and small bowel cancer.[10] Mortality: Mortality rates among people with Crohn's disease are slightly higher than in those without it. A systematic review of 7 population-based cohort studies found that estimates of standardised mortality ratios were >1 in 6 of the 7 studies, with estimates ranging from 0.72 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.01) to 2.16 (95% CI 1.54 to 2.94).[11] The review also found that mortality rates in Crohn's disease have not changed during the past 40 years.
Aims of intervention
To induce remission, prevent recurrence, allow return to normal activities, and improve quality of life, while minimising the adverse effects of treatment.
Outcomes
Remission rate (includes reporting on results for inducing complete remission and also improvement in symptoms that are part of the same spectrum of improvement, as measured using the Crohn's Disease Activity Index, Disease Activity Score, and Harvey–Bradshaw Index, increase in crude remission rates) Relapse rate (includes crude rates of clinical relapse, reduction in endoscopic recurrence rates [as measured using Rutgeerts' classification], reduction in radiological recurrence rates) Re-operation rate, Quality of life (as measured by using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire), Adverse effects (corticosteroid-related adverse effects [e.g., moon face, buffalo hump, bruising, striae, central obesity, hirsutism, hypertension], other adverse effects [infection, drug hypersensitivity reactions, impaired renal function, drug-induced lupus syndrome, serum sickness, gastrointestinal bleeding, nausea, vomiting, heartburn, diarrhoea, leukopenia, headache, back pain, gingival hyperplasia, alopecia], duration of postoperative stay in hospital, death, and postoperative adverse effects [enterocutaneous fistula, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, wound infection, abdominal sepsis, bowel obstruction, anastomotic leak]).
Methods
Clinical Evidence search and appraisal December 2009. The following databases were used to identify studies for this systematic review: Medline 1966 to December 2009, Embase 1980 to December 2009, and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4 (1966 to date of issue). An additional search within The Cochrane Library was carried out for the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA). We also searched for retractions of studies included in the review. Abstracts of the studies retrieved from the initial search were assessed by an information specialist. Selected studies were then sent to the contributor for additional assessment, using pre-determined criteria to identify relevant studies. Study design criteria for inclusion in this review were: published systematic reviews of RCTs and RCTs in any language, at least single blinded, and containing more than 20 individuals of whom more than 80% were followed up. There was no minimum length of follow-up required to include studies. We excluded all studies described as "open", "open label", or not blinded unless blinding was impossible. We included systematic reviews of RCTs and RCTs where harms of an included intervention were studied applying the same study design criteria for inclusion as we did for benefits. In addition, we did an observational harms search for specific harms as highlighted by the contributor, peer reviewer and editor. We searched for prospective and retrospective cohort studies on specific harms for azathioprine and infliximab. In addition, we use a regular surveillance protocol to capture harms alerts from organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), which are added to the reviews as required. To aid readability of the numerical data in our reviews, we round many percentages to the nearest whole number. Readers should be aware of this when relating percentages to summary statistics such as relative risks (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs). We have performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions included in this review (see table ). The categorisation of the quality of the evidence (into high, moderate, low, or very low) reflects the quality of evidence available for our chosen outcomes in our defined populations of interest. These categorisations are not necessarily a reflection of the overall methodological quality of any individual study, because the Clinical Evidence population and outcome of choice may represent only a small subset of the total outcomes reported, and population included, in any individual trial. For further details of how we perform the GRADE evaluation and the scoring system we use, please see our website (www.clinicalevidence.com).
Table 1.
Important outcomes | Remission rate, Relapse rate, Re-operation rate, Quality of life, Adverse effects. | ||||||||
Number of studies (participants) | Outcome | Comparison | Type of evidence | Quality | Consistency | Directness | Effect size | GRADE | Comment |
What are the effects of medical treatments to induce remission in adults with Crohn's disease? | |||||||||
1 (267) [12] | Remission rate | Methylprednisolone or prednisolone v placebo | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
1 (54) [15] | Remission rate | Different regiments of methylprednisolone v each other | 4 | –2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results |
2 (327) [16] | Remission rate | Budesonide v placebo | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
4 (660 )[18] [20] [21] [17] | Remission rate | Different regimens of budesonide v each other | 4 | –1 | 0 | –1 | 0 | Low | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of data. Directness point for the inclusion of prednisolone |
at least 8 (at least 750) [16] | Remission rate | Budesonide v methylprednisolone or prednisolone | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
5 (732) [27] [33] [34] | Remission rate | Mesalazine v placebo | 4 | 0 | –1 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Consistency point deducted for conflicting results |
1 (91) [35] | Remission rate | Olsalazine v placebo | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
1 (159) [13] | Remission rate | Sulfasalazine v placebo | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
6 (804) [37] | Remission rate | Antibiotics v placebo | 4 | 0 | –1 | –2 | 0 | Very low | Consistency point deducted for the use of different types of antibiotics. Directness points deducted for use of concomitant treatment and uncertainty of measure used to assess outcome |
1 (78) [39] | Remission rate | Metronidazole v sulfasalazine | 4 | –2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results |
1 (83) [40] | Remission rate | Rifaximin v placebo | 4 | –2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results |
1 (41)[41] | Remission rate | Ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole v methylprednisolone | 4 | –2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results |
1 (130)[42] | Remission rate | Ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole plus budesonide v budesonide alone | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
1 (49)[43] | Remission rate | Clofazimine plus prednisolone v placebo plus prednisolone | 4 | –2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results |
1 (213) [44] | Remission rate | Clarithromycin plus rifabutin plus clofazimine plus prednisolone v placebo plus prednisolone | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
8 (425) [46] | Remission rate | Azathioprine or mercaptopurine v placebo | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results |
1 (141)[48] | Remission rate | Methotrexate v placebo | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
1 (141)[48] | Quality of life | Methotrexate v placebo | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
1 (181)[51] [50] | Remission rate | Infliximab v placebo | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
4 (176)[55] | Remission rate | Ciclosporin v placebo | 4 | –1 | –1 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality point deducted for sparse data. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results |
What are the effects of surgical interventions to induce and maintain remission in adults with small bowel Crohn's disease? | |||||||||
7 non-randomised trials (688)[60] | Relapse rate | Strictureplasty v resection | 2 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Very low | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results |
15 non-randomised trials (506)[61] | Relapse rate | Finney v Heineke–Mikulicz procedure | 2 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Very low | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results |
15 non-randomised trials (560) [61] | Reoperation rate | Finney v Heineke–Mikulicz procedure | 2 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Very low | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results |
1 (131) [63] | Relapse rate | Limited v extended resection | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
What are the effects of surgical interventions to induce remission in adults with colonic Crohn's disease? | |||||||||
5 non-randomised trials (248) [69] | Relapse rate | Segmental colectomy v sub-total colectomy | 2 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Very low | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results |
What are the effects of medical interventions to maintain remission in adults with Crohn's disease? | |||||||||
6 (1339) [70] | Relapse rate | Aminosalicylates (mesalazine or olsalazine) v placebo | 4 | 0 | 0 | –1 | 0 | Moderate | Directness point deducted for including mesalazine and olsalazine |
at least 9 (at least 1305) [71] | Relapse rate | Mesalazine v placebo | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
7 (463) [74] | Relapse rate | Azathioprine v placebo | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
1 (77) [75] | Relapse rate | Azathioprine v budesonide | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
2 (98) [79] | Relapse rate | Methotrexate v placebo | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
3 (602)[82] | Relapse rate | Infliximab v placebo | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
1 (225)[84] | Relapse rate | Different doses of infliximab v each other | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results |
1 (unclear) [82] | Quality of life | Infliximab v placebo | 4 | –2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality points deducted for unclear population size and incomplete reporting of results |
2 (423) [56] [57] | Relapse rate | Ciclosporin v placebo | 4 | –1 | –1 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting or results. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results |
3 (303) [95] | Relapse rate | Methylprednisolone or prednisolone v placebo | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
6 (maximum 540)[96] | Relapse rate | Budesonide v placebo | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
3 (180)[96] | Relapse rate | Different regimens of budesonide v each other | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
What are the effects of medical interventions to maintain remission after surgery in adults with Crohn's disease? | |||||||||
5 (maximum 788) [99] [71] | Relapse rate | Mesalazine v placebo | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results |
1 (165) [100] | Relapse rate | Different regimens of mesalazine versus each other | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
2 (298) [101] [102] | Relapse rate | Sulfasalazine v placebo | 4 | 0 | –1 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Consistency point deducted for different results at different time frames |
3 (349)[71] | Relapse rate | Mesalazine v azathioprine or 6-MP | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
2 (168) [99] | Relapse rate | Azathioprine/6-MP v placebo | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
What are the effects of lifestyle interventions to maintain remission in adults with Crohn's disease? | |||||||||
6 (1039) [105] | Relapse rate | Fish oil v placebo | 4 | 0 | –2 | 0 | 0 | Low | Consistency points deducted for conflicting results, publication bias and heterogeneity among studies (clinical and statistical) |
1 (51)[106] | Relapse rate | Half-elemental diet v unrestricted diet | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
1 (51) [108] | Quality of life | Half-elemental diet v unrestricted diet | 4 | –2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results |
6 (209) [112] | Relapse rate | Probiotics v placebo | 4 | 0 | –1 | –1 | 0 | Low | Consistency point deducted for conflicting results with different strains. Directness point deducted for inclusion a co intervention. |
3 cohort studies (956)[113] [114] | Relapse rate | Smoking cessation v no smoking cessation | 2 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Very low | Quality point deducted for incomplete results |
7 cohort studies (1192) [113] [114] | Reoperation rate | Smoking cessation v no smoking cessation | 2 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Very low | Quality point deducted for incomplete results |
Type of evidence: 4 = RCT; 2 = Observational Consistency: similarity of results across studies; Directness: generalisability of population or outcomes; Effect size: based on relative risk or odds ratio; 6-MP, 6-mercaptopurine.
Glossary
- Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI)
Validated composite score grading the severity of Crohn's disease based on the following clinical parameters measured over 7 days: number of soft or liquid stools, use of antidiarrhoeal medication (0 or 1), abdominal pain (0–3), general well being (0–4), number of extraintestinal manifestations, abdominal mass (0, 2, or 5), haematocrit (% decrease from expected), and body weight (% decrease from expected). The scores achieved for each parameter are multiplied by a predefined factor, and the products are added to give a final score. Scores range from 0 to approximately 600. A CDAI score below 150 is generally considered to mean quiescent disease, whereas a score above 450 generally signifies very severe disease.
- Disease Activity Score
A non-validated composite score grading the severity of Crohn's disease based on the following parameters: number of soft or liquid stools, use of antidiarrhoeal medication, abdominal pain, general well being, number of extra-intestinal manifestations, abdominal mass, weight loss, fever, hypoalbumenaemia, anaemia, and increase in erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Scores range from 0 to 10. A CDAI score <5 signifies quiescent disease, whereas a score of >10 signifies severe disease.
- Elemental diet
A liquid diet, made up of simple forms of protein, carbohydrates, and fats that can be absorbed without further digestion. They are given either as total nutritional support to induce remission, or to support an exclusion diet or to supplement a normal diet. They are taken diluted in water, either orally or via a nasogastric tube or a percutaneous enterostomy tube.
- Fistula
An abnormal communication between two epithelial surfaces (e.g., bowel lumen and skin).
- Harvey-Bradshaw Index
A validated clinical index used for Crohn's disease. It includes general well being, abdominal pain, number of liquid stools, abdominal mass and complications, and ranges from 0 to 25, with remission defined as a score below 5.
- High-quality evidence
Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)
The IBDQ is a validated health-related quality-of-life questionnaire. It contains 32 questions, which are divided into four health domains: bowel symptoms (10 questions), systemic symptoms (5 questions), emotional function (12 questions), and social function (5 questions). The total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with higher scores reflecting better well being.
- Low-quality evidence
Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
- Moderate-quality evidence
Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
- Olsalazine
is broken down by the colonic flora into two molecules of mesalazine
- Rutgeerts' classification
Score grading the severity of recurrence of Crohn's disease following surgical resection of the terminal ileum, which is based on the following endoscopic findings: number of isolated aphthous ulcers (< 5 = 1 and > 5 = 2), generalised inflammation (diffuse ileitis = 3), and mucosal irregularity with narrowing ( = 4) in the neo-terminal ileum. A score of 0 denotes no recurrence, and 4 denotes severe recurrence.
- Very low-quality evidence
Any estimate of effect is very uncertain.
Disclaimer
The information contained in this publication is intended for medical professionals. Categories presented in Clinical Evidence indicate a judgement about the strength of the evidence available to our contributors prior to publication and the relevant importance of benefit and harms. We rely on our contributors to confirm the accuracy of the information presented and to adhere to describe accepted practices. Readers should be aware that professionals in the field may have different opinions. Because of this and regular advances in medical research we strongly recommend that readers' independently verify specified treatments and drugs including manufacturers' guidance. Also, the categories do not indicate whether a particular treatment is generally appropriate or whether it is suitable for a particular individual. Ultimately it is the readers' responsibility to make their own professional judgements, so to appropriately advise and treat their patients. To the fullest extent permitted by law, BMJ Publishing Group Limited and its editors are not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, products liability or otherwise) whether they be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the application of the information in this publication.
Contributor Information
Sarah C Mills, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Alexander C von Roon, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paris P Tekkis, The Royal Marsden and Chelsea and Westminster Hospitals, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Timothy R. Orchard, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
References
- 1.Jewell DP. Crohn's disease. In: Warrell DA, Cox TM, Firth JD, et al, eds. Oxford textbook of medicine. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Carter MJ, Lobo AJ, Travis SP. Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut 2004;53(Suppl 5):V1–V16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Travis SP, Stange EF, Lemann M, et al. European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: current management. Gut 2006;55(Suppl 1):i16–i35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lennard-Jones JE. Classification of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1989;170:2–6; discussion 16–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Loftus EV Jr. Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences. Gastroenterology 2004;126:1504–1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Loftus EV Jr, Schoenfeld P, Sandborn WJ. The epidemiology and natural history of Crohn's disease in population-based patient cohorts from North America: a systematic review. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:51–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Isaacs KL, Lewis JD, Sandborn WJ, et al. State of the art: IBD therapy and clinical trials in IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2005;11(Suppl 1):S3–S12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Grant IR. Zoonotic potential of Mycobacterium avium spp. paratuberculosis: the current position. J Appl Microbiol 2005;98:1282–1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Loftus EV Jr. Crohn's disease: why the disparity in mortality? Gut 2006;55:447–449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.von Roon AC, Reese GE, Teare J, et al. The risk of cancer in Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:839–855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wolters FL, Russel MG, Stockbrugger RW. Systematic review: has disease outcome in Crohn's disease changed during the last four decades? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:483–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Benchimol EI, Seow CH, Steinhart AH, et al. Traditional corticosteroids for induction of remission in Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2009. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Summers RW, Switz DM, Sessions JT Jr, et al. National Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study: results of drug treatment. Gastroenterology 1979;77:847–869. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Malchow H, Ewe K, Brandes JW, et al European Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study (ECCDS): results of drug treatment. Gastroenterology 1984;86:249–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Brignola C, De Simone G, Iannone P, et al. Influence of steroid treatment's duration in patients with active Crohn's disease. Agents Actions 1992;Spec No:C90–C92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Seow CH, Benchimol EI, Griffiths AM, et al. Budesonide for induction of remission in Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2009. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2008. 18646064 [Google Scholar]
- 17.Greenberg GR, Feagan BG, Martin F, et al. Oral budesonide for active Crohn's disease. Canadian Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994;331:836–841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Campieri M, Ferguson A, Doe W, Persson T, Nilsson LG. Oral budesonide is as effective as oral prednisolone in active Crohn's disease. The Global Budesonide Study Group. Gut 1997;41:209–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hofer KN. Oral budesonide in the management of Crohn's disease. Ann Pharmacother 2003;37:1457–1464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tremaine WJ, Hanauer SB, Katz S, et al. Budesonide CIR capsules (once or twice daily divided-dose) in active Crohn's disease: a randomized placebo-controlled study in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1748–1754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Herfarth H, Gross V, Andus T, et al. Analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of different doses of budesonide in patients with active Crohn's ileocolitis depending on disease activity and localization. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004;19:147–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Singleton JW, Law DH, Kelley ML Jr, et al. National Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study: adverse reactions to study drugs. Gastroenterology 1979;77:870–882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schoon EJ, Bollani S, Mills PR, et al. Bone mineral density in relation to efficacy and side effects of budesonide and prednisolone in Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;3:113–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lewis JD, Gelfand JM, Troxel AB, et al. Immunosuppressant medications and mortality in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:1428–1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Marehbian J, Arrighi HM, Hass S, et al. Adverse events associated with common therapy regimens for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:2524–2533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Otley A, Steinhart AH. Budesonide for induction of remission in Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2007. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date not reported. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hanauer SB, Stromberg U. Oral Pentasa in the treatment of active Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:379–388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gisbert JP, Gomollon F, Mate J, et al. Role of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. Dig Dis Sci 2002;47:471–488. Search date 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Klotz U. The role of aminosalicylates at the beginning of the new millennium in the treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000;56:353–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Singleton JW, Hanauer SB, Gitnick GL, et al. Mesalamine capsules for the treatment of active Crohn's disease: results of a 16-week trial. Pentasa Crohn's Disease Study Group. Gastroenterology 1993;104:1293–1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nordic Research Inc. Clinical research report: efficacy and safety of oral Pentasa in the treatment of active Crohn's disease. Nordic Research Inc., 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hoechst Marion Roussel Inc. Clinical study report: Efficacy and safety of oral Pentasa in the treatment of active Crohn's disease. Hoechst Marion Roussel Inc., 1997, Frankfurt, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rasmussen SN, Lauritsen K, Tage-Jensen U, et al. 5-Aminosalicylic acid in the treatment of Crohn's disease. A 16-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study with Pentasa. Scand J Gastroenterol 1987;22:877–883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mahida YR, Jewell DP. Slow-release 5-amino-salicylic acid (Pentasa) for the treatment of active Crohn's disease. Digestion 1990;45:88–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wright JP, Modigliani R, Malchow H. A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial of olsalazine for active Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 1995;1:241–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gisbert JP, Gonzalez-Lama Y, Mate J. 5-Aminosalicylates and renal function in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. Inflam Bowel Dis 2007;13:629–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Rezaie A, et al. A meta-analysis of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy in patients with active Crohn's disease. Clin Ther 2006;28:1983–1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Blichfeldt P, Blomhoff JP, Myhre E, et al. Metronidazole in Crohn's disease. A double blind cross-over clinical trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 1978;13:123–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ursing B, Alm T, Barany F, et al. A comparative study of metronidazole and sulfasalazine for active Crohn's disease: the cooperative Crohn's disease study in Sweden. II. Result. Gastroenterology 1982;83:550–562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Prantera C, Lochs H, Campieri M, et al. Antibiotic treatment of Crohn's disease: results of a multicentre, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with rifaximin. Aliment Pharmacol Therap 2006;23:1117–1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Prantera C, Zannoni F, Scribano ML, et al. An antibiotic regimen for the treatment of active Crohn's disease: a randomized, controlled clinical trial of metronidazole plus ciprofloxacin. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:328–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Steinhart AH, Feagan BG, Wong CJ, et al. Combined budesonide and antibiotic therapy for active Crohn's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2002;123:33–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Afdhal NH, Long A, Lennon J, et al. Controlled trial of antimycobacterial therapy in Crohn's disease. Clofazimine versus placebo. Dig Dis Sci 1991;36:449–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Selby W, Pavli P, Crotty B, et al. Two-year combination antibiotic therapy with clarithromycin, rifabutin, and clofazimine for Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2313–2319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Rahimi F, et al. A meta-analysis on the efficacy of probiotics for maintenance of remission and prevention of clinical and endoscopic relapse in Crohn's disease. Digest Dis Sci 2008;53:2524–2531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sandborn W, Sutherland L, Pearson D, et al. Azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine for inducing remission of Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2009. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.de Jong DJ, Goullet M, Naber TH. Side effects of azathioprine in patients with Crohn's disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;16:207–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Alfadhli AA, McDonald JW, Feagan BG. Methotrexate for induction of remission in refractory Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2007. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Feagan BG, Rochon J, Fedorak RN, et al. Methotrexate for the treatment of Crohn's disease. The North American Crohn's Study Group Investigators. N Engl J Med 1995;332:292–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Akobeng AK, Zachos M. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody for induction of remission in Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2007. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Clark W, Raftery J, Song F, et al. Systematic review and economic evaluation of the effectiveness of infliximab for the treatment of Crohn's disease. Health Technol Assess 2003;7:1–67. Search date 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Targan SR, Hanauer SB, van Deventer SJ, et al. A short-term study of chimeric monoclonal antibody cA2 to tumor necrosis factor alpha for Crohn's disease. Crohn's Disease cA2 Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1029–1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nahar IK, Shojania K, Marra CA, et al. Infliximab treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease. Ann Pharmacother 2003;37:1256–1265. Search date 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.MacLean CH, Mojica WA, Newberry SJ, et al. Systematic review of the effects of n-3 fatty acids in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:611–619. Search date 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.McDonald JW, Feagan BG, Jewell D, et al. Cyclosporine for induction of remission in Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2007. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Feagan BG, McDonald JW, Rochon J, et al. Low-dose cyclosporine for the treatment of Crohn's disease. The Canadian Crohn's Relapse Prevention Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1846–1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Stange EF, Modigliani R, Pena AS, Wood AJ, Feutren G, Smith PR. European trial of cyclosporine in chronic active Crohn's disease: a 12-month study. The European Study Group. Gastroenterology 1995;109:774–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jewell DP, Lennard-Jones JE, Lowes J, et al. Oral cyclosporin for chronic active Crohn's disease: A multicentre controlled trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1994;6:499–505. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Brynskov J, Freund L, Rasmussen SN, et al. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of cyclosporine therapy in active chronic Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 1989;321:845–850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Reese GE, Purkayastha S, Tilney HS, et al. Strictureplasty vs resection in small bowel Crohn's disease: an evaluation of short-term outcomes and recurrence. Colorect Dis 2007;9:686–694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tichansky D, Cagir B, Yoo E, et al. Strictureplasty for Crohn's disease: meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:911–919. Search date 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yamamoto T, Fazio VW, Tekkis PP. Safety and efficacy of strictureplasty for Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1968–1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fazio VW, Marchetti F, Church M, et al. Effect of resection margins on the recurrence of Crohn's disease in the small bowel. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 1996;224:563–571; discussion 71–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rosman AS, Melis M, Fichera A. Metaanalysis of trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for Crohn's disease. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1549–1555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Tilney HS, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1036–1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tan JJ, Tjandra JJ. Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis. Dis Col Rec 2007;50:576–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Polle SW, Wind J, Ubbink DT, et al. Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. A systematic review. Dig Surg 2006;23:346–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Polle SW, Bemelman WA, et al. Surgery insight: minimally invasive surgery for IBD. Nature Clin Pr Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;4:324–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tekkis PP, Purkayastha S, Lanitis S, et al. A comparison of segmental vs subtotal/total colectomy for colonic Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:82–90. Search date 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Akobeng AK, Gardener E. Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of medically-induced remission in Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2007. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Steinhart AH, Forbes A, Mills EC, et al. Systematic review: the potential influence of mesalazine formulation on maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Therap 2007;25:1389–1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mahmud N, Kamm MA, Dupas JL, et al. Olsalazine is not superior to placebo in maintaining remission of inactive Crohn's colitis and ileocolitis: a double blind, parallel, randomised, multicentre study. Gut 2001;49:552–556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Binder V. Epidemiology of IBD during the twentieth century: an integrated view. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2004;18:463–479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Prefontaine E, Sutherland LR, MacDonald JK, et al. Azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2009. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Mantzaris GJ, Christidou A, Sfakianakis M, et al. Azathioprine is superior to budesonide in achieving and maintaining mucosal healing and histologic remission in steroid-dependent Crohn's disease. Inflam Bowel Dis 2009;15:375–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Beaugerie L, Brousse N, Bouvier AM, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders in patients receiving thiopurines for inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective observational cohort study. Lancet 2009;374:1617–1625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Mantzaris GJ, Roussos A, Christidou A, et al. The long-term efficacy of azathioprine does not wane after four years of continuous treatment in patients with steroid-dependent luminal Crohn's disease. J Crohn's Colitis 2007;1:28–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Vandell AG, DiPiro JT. Low-dosage methotrexate for treatment and maintenance of remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Pharmacotherapy 2002;22:613–620. Search date 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Patel V, MacDonald JK, Donald-John WD, et al. Methotrexate for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2009. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Feagan BG, Fedorak RN, Irvine EJ, et al. A comparison of methotrexate with placebo for the maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. North American Crohn's Study Group Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1627–1632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Peyrin-Biroulet L, Deltenre P, de Suray N, et al. Efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor antagonists in Crohn's disease: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:644–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Behm BW, Bickston SJ. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Librar, Issue 4, 2009. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Feagan BG, Yan S, Bala M, et al. The effects of infliximab maintenance therapy on health-related quality of life. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:2232–2238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. Maintenance infliximab for Crohn's disease: the ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:1541–1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Rutgeerts P, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. Comparison of scheduled and episodic treatment strategies of infliximab in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2004;126:402–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Lichtenstein GR, Olson A, Travers S, et al. Factors associated with the development of intestinal strictures or obstructions in patients with Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:1030–1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lichtenstein GR, Feagan BG, Cohen RD, et al. Serious infections and mortality in association with therapies for Crohn's disease: TREAT registry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:621–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Caspersen S, Elkjaer M, Riis L, et al. Infliximab for inflammatory bowel disease in Denmark 1999-2005: clinical outcome and follow-up evaluation of malignancy and mortality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:1212–1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Fidder H, Schnitzler F, Ferrante M, et al. Long-term safety of infliximab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a single-centre cohort study. Gut 2009;58:501–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Lees CW, Ali AI, Thompson AI, et al. The safety profile of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease in clinical practice: analysis of 620 patient-years follow-up. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009;29:286–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Schneeweiss S, Korzenik J, Solomon DH, et al. Infliximab and other immunomodulating drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and the risk of serious bacterial infections. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009;30:253–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Rutgeerts P, D′Haens G, Targan S, et al. Efficacy and safety of retreatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody (infliximab) to maintain remission in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 1999;117:761–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hanauer SB, Wagner CL, Bala M, et al. Incidence and importance of antibody responses to infliximab after maintenance or episodic treatment in Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:542–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Baert F, Noman M, Vermeire S, et al. Influence of immunogenicity on the long-term efficacy of infliximab in Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 2003;348:601–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Steinhart AH, Ewe K, Griffiths AM, et al. Corticosteroids for maintaining remission of Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2009. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [Google Scholar]
- 96.Benchimol EI, Seow CH, Otley AR, et al. Budesonide for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2009. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 97.Hanauer S, Sandborn WJ, Persson A, et al. Budesonide as maintenance treatment in Crohn's disease: a placebo-controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:363–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Camma C, Giunta M, Rosselli M, et al. Mesalamine in the maintenance treatment of Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis adjusted for confounding variables. Gastroenterology 1997;113:1465–1473. Search date 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Doherty G, Bennett G, Patil S, et al. Interventions for prevention of post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2009. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Caprilli R, Cottone M, Tonelli F, et al. Two mesalazine regimens in the prevention of the post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease: a pragmatic, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:517–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Ewe K, Herfarth C, Malchow H, et al. Postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease in relation to radicality of operation and sulfasalazine prophylaxis: a multicenter trial. Digestion 1989;42:224–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Wenckert A, Kristensen M, Eklund AE, et al. The long-term prophylactic effect of salazosulphapyridine (Salazopyrin) in primarily resected patients with Crohn's disease. A controlled double-blind trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 1978;13:161–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Peyrin-Biroulet L, Deltenre P, Ardizzone S, et al. Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for the prevention of postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:2089–2096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Myrelid P, Olaison G, Sjodahl R, et al. Thiopurine therapy is associated with postoperative intra-abdominal septic complications in abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease. Dis Col Rect 2009;52:1387–1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Turner D, Zlotkin SH, Shah PS, et al. Omega 3 fatty acids (fish oil) for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2009. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Akobeng AK, Thomas AG. Enteral nutrition for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2007. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 107.Takagi S, Utsunomiya K, Kuriyama S, et al. Effectiveness of an 'half elemental diet' as maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease: a randomized-controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:1333–1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Takagi S, Utsunomiya K, Kuriyama S, et al. Quality of life of patients and medical cost of "half elemental diet" as maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease: secondary outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis 2009;41:390–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Zachos M, Tondeur M, Griffiths A. Enteral nutritional therapy for induction of remission in Crohn's disease (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2007. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Goh J, O'Morain A. Review article: nutrition and adult inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:307–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Rolfe VE, Fortun PJ, Hawkey CJ, et al. Probiotics for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2007. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Shen J, Ran HZ, Yin MH, et al. Meta-analysis: the effect and adverse events of Lactobacilli versus placebo in maintenance therapy for Crohn disease. Int Med J 2009;39:103–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Johnson GJ, Cosnes J, Mansfield JC. Review article: smoking cessation as primary therapy to modify the course of Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:921–931. Search date 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Yamamoto T, Keighley MR. Smoking and disease recurrence after operation for Crohn's disease. Br J Surg 2000;87:398–404. Search date 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Cosnes J, Beaugerie L, Carbonnel F, et al. Smoking cessation and the course of Crohn's disease: an intervention study. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1093–1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Lindberg E, Jarnerot G, Huitfeldt B. Smoking in Crohn's disease: effect on localisation and clinical course. Gut 1992;33:779–782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Cottone M, Rosselli M, Orlando A, et al. Smoking habits and recurrence in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 1994;106:643–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Breuer-Katschinski BD, Hollander N, Goebell H. Effect of cigarette smoking on the course of Crohn's disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996;8:225–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Cosnes J, Carbonnel F, Beaugerie L, et al. Effects of cigarette smoking on the long-term course of Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 1996;110:424–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Timmer A, Sutherland LR, Martin F. Oral contraceptive use and smoking are risk factors for relapse in Crohn's disease. The Canadian Mesalamine for Remission of Crohn's Disease Study Group. Gastroenterology 1998;114:1143–1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Yamamoto T, Keighley MR. The association of cigarette smoking with a high risk of recurrence after ileocolonic resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease. Surg Today 1999;29:579–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Yamamoto T, Allan RN, Keighley MR. Smoking is a predictive factor for outcome after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with Crohn's colitis. Br J Surg 1999;86:1069–1070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Cosnes J, Carbonnel F, Carrat F, et al. Effects of current and former cigarette smoking on the clinical course of Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999;13:1403–1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]