Abstract
Ubiquitylation is fundamental for the regulation of the stability and function of p53 and c-Myc. The E3 ligase Pirh2 has been reported to polyubiquitylate p53 and to mediate its proteasomal degradation. Here, using Pirh2 deficient mice, we report that Pirh2 is important for the in vivo regulation of p53 stability in response to DNA damage. We also demonstrate that c-Myc is a novel interacting protein for Pirh2 and that Pirh2 mediates its polyubiquitylation and proteolysis. Pirh2 mutant mice display elevated levels of c-Myc and are predisposed for plasma cell hyperplasia and tumorigenesis. Consistent with the role p53 plays in suppressing c-Myc-induced oncogenesis, its deficiency exacerbates tumorigenesis of Pirh2−/− mice. We also report that low expression of human PIRH2 in lung, ovarian, and breast cancers correlates with decreased patients' survival. Collectively, our data reveal the in vivo roles of Pirh2 in the regulation of p53 and c-Myc stability and support its role as a tumor suppressor.
Author Summary
Tumor suppressors and oncogenes play critical roles in cancer development. The tumor suppressor p53 and the oncogene c-MYC are among the most frequently deregulated genes in human cancer, and their ubiquitylation mediated by several E3 ligases is critical for their turnover and their functions. P53 has been shown to be ubiquitylated by Pirh2; however, the physiological significance of this modification of p53 remains unknown. In this study we have generated mice deficient for Pirh2 and have observed that loss of Pirh2 results in a higher level of p53 and cell death, especially in response to radiation. Remarkably, we also identified that Pirh2 interacts with c-Myc and mediates its polyubiquitylation and degradation. c-Myc accumulates in the absence of Pirh2 and this accumulation is accompanied by increased tumorigenesis of Pirh2-deficient mice. We also report that dual deficiency of Pirh2 and p53 synergizes cancer development. Examination of the expression level of PIRH2 in human cancers indicated that its lower expression level associates with poor survival of patients with lung, ovarian, or breast cancers. Collectively, these data indentify Pirh2 as a novel tumor suppressor involved in the regulation of both p53 and c-Myc.
Introduction
Protein ubiquitylation is essential for a broad spectrum of cellular processes including nuclear export, endocytosis, transcriptional regulation, DNA damage repair and proteasomal degradation [1]. Impairment of the ubiquitylation process has been associated with a variety of human diseases including autoimmunity, immunodeficiency, inflammation and cancer [2], [3].
One well established role for ubiquitylation in cancer is its function in regulating the stability and function of the tumor suppressor p53 and the oncogene c-MYC, two proteins with major roles in human malignancies [2]–[4]. Monoubiquitylation of p53 serves to signal its nuclear export as well as its mitochondrial translocation, while p53 polyubiquitylation targets it for proteasomal degradation. Remarkably, p53 is targeted for ubiquitylation by several ubiquitin E3 ligases including Pirh2 (Rchy1), Mdm2/Hdm2, Cop1, E6/E6AP, ARF-BP1, Synoviolin and by atypical E3 ligases including E4F1 [5].
Similar to p53, ubiquitylation is critical for the regulation of the function and stability of c-MYC, an oncoprotein frequently overexpressed in various human cancers including breast and ovarian cancer [6], [7]. The ubiquitin ligases FBW7, SKP2 and ARF-BP1/HectH9 have been shown to mediate c-MYC ubiquitylation. While c-MYC polyubiquitylation by FBW7 leads to its proteasomal degradation, its polyubiquitylation by ARF-BP1 increases its transcriptional activity. c-MYC ubiquitylation by SKP2 has been shown to mediate both its transactivation activity and proteasomal degradation [2], [6]. Interestingly, some of the E3 ligases important for the regulation of c-Myc also regulate p53 function. SKP2 negatively regulates p53 by suppressing its acetylation by p300 while ARF-BP1 suppresses p53 through its polyubiquitylation and proteolysis [8], [9]. Furthermore, FBW7 loss of function has been reported to attenuate p53 activity [10].
The identification of multiple E3 ligases that regulate the function and stability of p53 and c-MYC and the possible involvement of some of these E3 ligases in the regulation of both p53 and c-Myc have raised questions regarding the physiological functions of these E3 ligases. Despite the identification of Pirh2 as an E3 ligase that polyubiquitylates p53 in cell culture assays, its in vivo functions remain unknown. Here we report that mice deficient for Pirh2 are viable but display elevated levels of p53 and apoptosis in response to DNA damage. We also demonstrate that c-Myc is a novel Pirh2 interacting protein and that Pirh2 regulates c-Myc expression levels by mediating its polyubiquitylation and proteolysis. Consistent with this novel Pirh2 function, mice mutant for Pirh2 show elevated levels of c-Myc and increased risk for plasma cell hyperplasia, gammaglobulinemia, and tumorigenesis. In accordance with the role of p53 in suppressing c-Myc oncogenesis, its inactivation considerably increases spontaneous cancer susceptibility of Pirh2 deficient mice. We also report that the expression of PIRH2 is reduced in various human cancers and that lower levels of PIRH2 expression correlate with decreased survival of patients with lung, breast or ovarian cancer.
Collectively, these data support a role for Pirh2 in the in vivo regulation of p53 functions, demonstrate its negative regulation of the oncoprotein c-Myc, and support its role as a novel tumor suppressor.
Results
Pirh2 Is Dispensable for Development
Although p53 is a substrate for ubiquitylation by several E3-ligases, to date only Mdm2 is known to be required for p53 regulation in vivo as its deficiency leads to embryonic lethality in a p53-dependent manner [11]–[13]. To characterize the physiological functions of Pirh2, an E3 ligase previously reported to polyubiquitylate p53 and regulate its stability [14], we generated Pirh2 mutant mice (Figure S1A and S1B). Western blot analysis indicated loss of Pirh2 protein in Pirh2−/− cells (Figure S1C). By contrast to Mdm2 deficiency [11]–[13], loss of Pirh2 did not affect embryonic development. Pirh2−/− mice were born in a Mendelian ratio, were fertile and did not present any apparent developmental defects compared to their wildtype (Wt) littermates. Analysis of total cell numbers as well as the different cell subpopulations in thymus, spleen, lymph nodes (LN) and bone marrow (BM) of 6 to 8 week-old Pirh2−/− mice revealed no significant differences compared to Wt littermates (Figure S1D and S1E). In addition, [3H] thymidine incorporation assay indicated that loss of Pirh2 had no significant effect on the in vitro proliferation of T- and B-cells from 6 to 8 week-old Pirh2−/− mice (Figure S1F). These data indicate that Pirh2 is dispensable for embryonic and postnatal development.
Pirh2 Regulates p53 Turnover in Response to DNA Damage
p53 is essential for several cellular processes including apoptosis, cell cycle, senescence and metabolism and its stability is regulated by various proteins including the E3 ligases Mdm2, Cop1, and ARF-BP1 [5], [15]. To determine the role Pirh2 plays in the in vivo regulation of p53, we examined p53 levels and functions in Pirh2 deficient mice and cells. Splenocytes and thymocytes from Pirh2−/− and Wt mice were irradiated ex-vivo, and the levels of p53 expression and activation were determined by Western Blot analysis. Untreated Pirh2−/− cells displayed mildly increased expression of p53 compared to Wt controls (Figure 1A). However, untreated Pirh2−/− cells, similar to Wt controls, displayed no detectable expression of the p53 transcriptional targets p21, bax, and Puma (Figure 1A). We examined the effect of Pirh2 deficiency on irradiation (IR) induced p53 expression and have observed that irradiation of Pirh2−/− splenocytes resulted in higher expression levels of p53 and its targets p21, bax, and Puma compared to Wt controls (Figure 1A and 1B). Consitent with the reported increased transcription of pirh2 in response to p53 activation in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) [14], Pirh2 mRNA was found to increase by 1.5 fold at 1 to 4 h post irradiation of splenocytes (Figure S2A). To examine the in vivo effects of Pirh2 loss on the expression of p53, Pirh2−/− mice and their Wt littermates were subjected to whole-body irradiation (6 Gγ) and their tissues were collected at different time points post-irradiation (0–12 h). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) examination of p53 expression indicated that while p53 was undetectable in spleen, thymus, intestinal crypts and liver from untreated Pirh2−/− and Wt mice, the frequency of cells expressing p53 in these organs was significantly higher post-IR of Pirh2−/− mice compared to Wt controls (Figure 1C and 1D, Figure S2B–S2D). We next examined the effect of PIRH2 deficiency on P53 level using human RKO cells in which PIRH2 was knocked down by a tetracycline-inducible system [16]. Similar to murine cells, deficiency of PIRH2 in RKO cells only slightly increased P53 level under untreated conditions, but this increase was more pronounced post-IR (Figure S2E).
Phosphorylation of p53 is critical for its stability and functions [17]. For instance, in response to DNA damage, p53 is phosphorylated on Serine 15 (p53-S15) by a number of kinases including ATM, DNA-PK and ATR and phosphorylation of this p53 site, together with others, is important for its stability and functions [17]. To further examine the effect of Pirh2 deficiency on p53 stability and function, we examined by Western blotting the level of p53-S15 in Pirh2−/− and Wt cells. While, the level of p53-S15 was similarly low in untreated Pirh2−/− and Wt splenocytes, it was significantly higher in irradiated Pirh2−/− cells compared to Wt controls (Figure S3A). Similarly, IHC analysis indicated no differences in the levels of p53-S15 in spleen of untreated Pirh2−/− mice and Wt controls; however a marked increased expression of this phosphorylated form of p53 was observed post whole-body irradiation of Pirh2−/− mice compared to Wt controls (Figure S3B).
We next examined the effect of PIRH2 expression on the level of S15-p53 using H1299 cells transiently transfected with expression vectors for MDM2 or PIRH2 and either wildtype p53, p53 S15A or p53 S15D. The presence of Alanine (A) at residue 15 of p53 prevents p53 phosphorylation at this site while the presence of Asparatic acid (D) at this site mimics its constitutive phosphorylation. Western blot analysis indicated that overexpression of MDM2 or PIRH2 decreased the level of wildtype p53 (Figure S3C). Consistent with previous data, overexpression of MDM2 was able to decrease the stability of p53 S15A and p53 S15D [17]–[19]. Interestingly, while overexpression of PIRH2 resulted in decreased expression of both forms of p53, its effect was more pronounced on p53 S15D. Collectively, these data support a role for Pirh2 in the regulation of p53.
Pirh2 Deficiency Leads to Elevated Irradiation-Induced Apoptosis
p53 plays central roles in IR-induced apoptosis; therefore we have examined the effect of Pirh2 deficiency on the levels of apoptosis under untreated and DNA damage conditions. Splenocytes and thymocytes from Pirh2−/− and Wt mice were either untreated or irradiated (6 Gγ) and their apoptotic levels examined using the AnnexinV/PI assay (Figure 2A). We also examined the level of apoptosis in thymus, spleen and intestinal crypts from whole-body irradiated (6 Gγ) mice using TUNEL assay and cleaved caspase 3 IHC (Figure 2B and 2C, Figure S3D and S3E). Our data indicated no increased level of spontaneous apoptosis in the absence of Pirh2; however consistent with the elevated IR-induced expression of p53 and its proapototic target genes Bax and Puma in the absence of Pirh2, IR-induced cell death was significantly elevated in Pirh2−/− cells and mice compared to Wt controls. These data demonstrate that Pirh2 deficiency results in elevated IR-induced apoptosis.
Pirh2 Interacts with the Oncoprotein c-Myc
In our search for novel Pirh2 interacting proteins we identified interaction of Pirh2 and c-Myc. We observed that human PIRH2 and c-MYC reciprocally co-immunoprecipitate upon overexpression in HEK293 cells (Figure 3A). Endogenous interaction of murine Pirh2 and c-Myc was confirmed in NIH3T3 cells where immunoprecipitation of Pirh2 pulled down c-Myc and immunoprecipitation of c-Myc pulled down Pirh2 (Figure 3B).
We next examined whether PIRH2 and c-MYC interaction was direct and characterized the domains involved in this interaction. We performed Glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays using purified GST or His-fusion proteins of the full length or fragments of PIRH2 and c-MYC. These pull-down assays indicated interaction of PIRH2 amino acids (aa) 138–261 with the N-terminus of c-MYC (aa 120–160) that contains MYCboxII (MBII) but not with N-terminus of c-MYC (aa 1–69) that contains MYCboxI (MBI) (Figure 3C and 3E, Figure S4A). Notably, MBII (aa 128–143) is important for c-MYC proteasomal degradation, transcriptional repression and activation and for controlling c-MYC transformation ability [20]. Pull-down experiments using His-C-terminus of c-MYC (aa 353–434) demonstrated the interaction of this region of c-MYC with the N-terminus of PIRH2 (aa 1–137) (Figure 3D and 3E). These data reveal c-MYC as a novel interacting protein for PIRH2 and indicate the importance of different domains of c-MYC and PIRH2 for this interaction.
Pirh2 Mediates c-Myc Polyubiquitylation
Polyubiquitylation of c-Myc is critical for the regulation of its stability and functions [2], [6]. Our observation that c-MYC interacted with the E3 ligase PIRH2 raised the possibility that it might be a target for PIRH2 mediated ubiquitylation. We examined this hypothesis in HEK293T cells that overexpress HA-Ubiquitin (Ub), human c-MYC, and/or either human full length PIRH2 or a PIRH2 lacking the ring finger domain (PIRH2ΔR). 48 h post-transfection, immunoprecipitation followed by Western Blot analysis revealed high-molecular-weight c-MYC species where full length PIRH2, but not PIRH2ΔR, were overexpressed in the presence of c-MYC and HA-Ub (Figure 4A). Anti-HA immunoblot of c-MYC immunoprecipitates confirmed that the observed high-molecular-weight c-MYC species in the presence of the full length PIRH2 were indeed due to its polyubiquitylation. Our data also demonstrated the requirement for the RING finger domain of PIRH2 for its polyubiquitylation of c-MYC (Figure 4B). Similarly, we examined the ability of PIRH2 to polyubiquitylate T58A c-MYC as phosphorylation of c-MYC at this site is critical for its polyubiquitylation by FBW7. Consitent with our finding that MBI that contains T58 is dispensible for the interaction c-MYC-PIRH2, PIRH2 was able to ubioquitylate T58A mutant c-MYC (Figure S4B). We also performed in vitro ubiquitylation assays and observed that PIRH2 directly polyubiquitylates c-MYC (Figure 4C and 4D).
We next examined the role of Pirh2 in the ubiquitylation of the endogenous c-Myc using Pirh2−/− and Wt B-cells. Anti-IgM activated B-cells were pre-treated for 3 h with the proteasome inhibitor MG132, and c-Myc immunoprecipitates were examined for their levels of ubiquitylation using anti-c-Myc and anti-ubiquitin antibodies. Pirh2 deficiency resulted in reduced level of both high-molecular-weight and polyubiquitylated forms of c-Myc (Figure 4E and 4F). Taken together, these data identified c-Myc as a novel substrate for Pirh2-mediated polyubiquitylation.
Pirh2 Mediates c-Myc Proteolysis and Its Absence Leads to Accumulation of c-Myc Protein
Since c-Myc polyubiquitylation can control its turnover, we examined the steady state levels of c-Myc in Wt and Pirh2−/− MEFs in the presence of the protein biosynthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX). These studies indicated that while less than 40% of c-Myc remained in Wt MEFs 1 h post-CHX treatment, near 80% of c-Myc remained in Pirh2−/− MEFs (Figure 5A). Similarly, knockdown of human PIRH2 in RKO cells resulted in increased c-MYC stability (Figure 5B).
Because Pirh2 interacted with c-Myc and mediated its polyubiquitylation and proteolysis, we examined the effect of its deficiency on the level of c-Myc protein. We first assessed by Western blotting the expression of c-Myc in B-cells from young (6–8 weeks old) Pirh2−/− mice and their Wt littermates. c-Myc protein level was significantly increased in naïve and in anti-IgM activated Pirh2−/− B-cells compared to Wt controls (Figure 5C). Immunohistochemistry analysis of the expression level of c-Myc protein in spleen from young Pirh2−/− and Wt mice also showed increased c-Myc level in the absence of Pirh2 (Figure 5D). Quantitative real time PCR analysis of cDNA from Pirh2 −/− and Wt splenocytes indicated that despite the increased protein expression of c-Myc in Pirh2−/− cells, c-Myc mRNA abundance was not significantly affected compared to Wt controls (Figure 5E). However, examination of c-Myc transcriptional targets indicated that the RNA expression level of E2f1, Ccna2, Ccnd2 and Brca1 was significantly increased while Mcl-1 RNA expression was repressed in accordance with the elevated levels of c-Myc in Pirh2−/− cells (Figure 5E). Increased level of Ccnd2 protein was also observed in splenocytes from young Pirh2−/− mice compared to Wt littermates (Figure 5F). Western blot examination of c-Myc expression in various tissues from young Pirh2−/− mice and Wt littermates indicated increased c-Myc level in the absence of Pirh2, with the highest increase observed in spleen, testis and mammary glands (Figure 5F and 5G).
The tumor suppressor p19ARF has been shown to be upregulated in response to high, but not to low, levels of deregulated c-Myc [21]. Using Western blotting we evaluated the level of p19ARF in cells and tissues from young Pirh2−/− mice and their Wt littermates. The level of p19ARF protein was found elevated in Pirh2−/− activated B-cells and in tissues that express high levels of c-Myc (e.g. spleen, testis, mammary glands) (Figure 5C, 5G and 5J).
We next examined whether the loss of human PIRH2 would also lead to increased level of c-MYC protein. Western blot analysis indicated that similar to Pirh2 deficiency in mice, knock down of the human PIRH2 in RKO cells significantly increased the protein expression level of c-MYC (Figure 5H). Conversely, overexpression of human PIRH2 in RKO cells downregulated their protein level of c-MYC (Figure 5I).
Since Skp2 and Fbw7 mediate c-Myc polyubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation [2], [6], [22], [23], we examined their expression levels in Pirh2−/− cells and Wt controls. Western blot analyses indicated no difference in the expression levels of Skp2 in spleen, liver and kidney from Pirh2 −/− and Wt mice, while Fbw7 expression was barely detectable in these organs independently of the genotypes (Figure 5J). We next sought to examine whether PIRH2-c-MYC complex may also contains SKP2 or FBW7. While Western blotting analysis of whole cell lysate of RKO cells showed that these cells expressed PIRH2, SKP2 and FBW7; PIHR2 immunoprecipitation from these cells pulled down c-MYC, but failed to pull down SKP2 or FBW7 (Figure S4C). Therefore SKP2 and FBW7 are not part of the PIRH2-c-MYC complex.
Collectively, these data demonstrate that Pirh2 deficiency leads to increased level of c-Myc protein and that Pirh2 regulates c-Myc stability.
PIRH2 Expression Is Downregulated in Human Cancer
PIRH2 was reported to be overexpressed in lung and prostate cancer [24], [25]; however, to date no human pathologies have been associated with its decreased expression. To assess whether reduced Pirh2 expression associates with cancer, we examined PIRH2 expression in primary human cancers using microarray studies that associated mRNA levels to patient outcome. Median dichotomization was used to identify patients with high- and low-PIRH2 expression levels. We found that lower levels of PIRH2 mRNA were associated with reduced patient survival in breast cancer [26], [27] (Figure 6A), ovarian cancer [28], [29] (Figure 6B) and squamous cell carcinomas of the lung [30], [31] (Figure 6C).
The expression level of PIRH2 mRNA was also surveyed in microarray studies of human cancer using the Oncomine database [32]. Expression of PIRH2 mRNA was significantly reduced in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma [33], adult germ cell tumors [34] and invasive bladder cancer [35] compared to controls (Figure S5). These data indicate the high prognostic significance of PIRH2 expression for patients with these tumor types.
Pirh2 Mutation Leads to Plasma Cell Hyperplasia, Gammaglobulinemia, Kidney Failure, and Premature Death
Deregulated c-Myc has been associated with a number of diseases including plasma cell hyperplasia, gammaglobulinemia, kidney failure and cancer development [7], [36]–[38]. Monitoring of cohorts of Pirh2 mutant and Wt mice indicated that both Pirh2−/− and Pirh2+/− mice had reduced lifespan compared to Wt littermates (Figure 7A). Necropsy of Pirh2 mutant mice indicated that these mutants developed a lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by plasma cell hyperplasia. 100% of sick Pirh2 mutants presented splenomegaly while lymphadenopathy was observed in 40% and 20% of sick Pirh2−/− and Pirh2+/− mice respectively (Figure 7B and 7C). Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining of spleen and lymph nodes from sick Pirh2 mutant mice, together with in-touch blood smears, illustrated the presence of plasma cells with large basophilic cytoplasm, eccentric nuclei with clock face appearance and occasional multiple Russell bodies (Figure 7D–7G), all typical features of well differentiated plasma cells. FACS analysis and IHC staining for CD138, a marker for plasma cells, indicated increased proportion of CD138+B220− cells in the spleen of sick Pirh2−/− mice (Figure S6A and S6B). Infiltration of these plasma cells was evident in regional lymph nodes and kidneys (Figure 7E and 7G). Pirh2−/− plasma cell perivascular infiltrates to non lymphoid organs displayed elevated levels of c-Myc that was accompanied by increased proliferation as indicated by their level of Ki67 (Figure S7A). Consistent with these data and the increased expression of c-Myc in Pirh2−/− splenocytes, activated T-cells or B-cells from Pirh2−/− mice displayed higher proliferation rates compared to Wt controls (Figure S7B). In addition these Pirh2−/− activated cells also displayed increased apoptosis compared to Wt controls (Figure S7C).
As the cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) is important for the differentiation and survival of plasma cells [39], and Pirh2−/− mice develop a plasma cell disorder, we next examined by ELISA the serum level of IL-6 in Pirh2−/− mice and their controls. We observed elevated levels of IL-6 in the serum of sick Pirh2 mutant mice compared to Wt littermates (Figure S6D).
Macroscopic analysis of sick Pirh2−/− and Pirh2+/− mutant mice indicated the presence of pale kidneys in about 40% of the cases. In order to examine the cause for this kidney defect, H&E staining was performed on kidneys from Pirh2 mutants and Wt littermates. Since infiltration of plasma cells was observed in kidneys from Pirh2 mutant mice (Figure 7G), we investigated whether the kidney defects of these mice would be associated with immunoglobulin (Ig) deposits. Staining of kidney sections with anti-Ig antibodies indicated the presence of glomerular Ig deposition in Pirh2−/− and Pirh2+/− mice but not in age matched Wt littermates (Figure S6C).
In accordance with the plasma cell hyperplasia and the elevated level of glomerular Ig deposition observed in Pirh2 mutant mice, ELISA analysis of serum Ig levels of 10 to 12 month-old Pirh2−/− mice indicated that these mice suffered gammaglobulinemia. Significantly elevated levels of IgG1, IgG2b and IgA were observed in the serum of Pirh2−/− mice compared to their Wt littermates (Figure S6E).
While plasma cells in sick Pirh2 mutant mice showed several histological and morphological features of malignancy, their lack of clonality as assessed by rearrangement of Ig loci, and the polyclonal gammaglobulinemia of Pirh2 mutant mice prevented us from characterizing the disease as a plasma cell neoplasm. These data indicate that Pirh2 deficiency results in plasma cell hyperplasia, gammaglobulinemia, glomerular Ig deposition and kidney failure that likely contribute to the premature death of Pirh2 mutant mice.
Pirh2 Is a Tumor Suppressor and It Deficiency Synergizes Tumorigenesis Associated with p53 Loss
Overexpression of ubiquitin ligases including MDM2, COP1 and ARF-BP1 has been observed in human cancer [40]–[42], while downregulation of others such as FBW7 or Rnf8 promotes tumorigenesis [2], [43], [44]. Monitoring of cohorts of Pirh2 mutant mice indicated that in addition to plasma cell hyperplasia and kidney failure, approximately 25% of Pirh2−/− and 17% of Pirh2+/− sick mice developed solid tumors including sarcomas, liver, testes, mammary and lung tumors (Figure 8C and 8D, Figure S8A–S8D and Table S1).
P53 is the most frequently inactivated tumor suppressor in human cancer [45], and its loss facilitates c-Myc induced oncogenesis [46]. To examine the effect of p53 deficiency on development and tumorigenesis of Pirh2 mutant mice, we crossed Pirh2−/− and p53−/− mice and generated Pirh2−/−p53−/− mice. Double mutant mice were born in a Mendelian ratio and showed no developmental defects. Remarkably, Pirh2−/−p53−/− mice had a dramatically reduced lifespan compared to p53−/− and Pirh2−/− mice with all double mutants dying before 126 days of age compared to 230 days for p53−/− littermates (Figure 8A). Necropsy examination of Pirh2−/−p53−/− mice indicated that 60% of them died due to their tumor burden, while the cause of death remained unknown for the remaining mutants. The tumor spectrum of Pirh2−/−p53−/− mice was significantly altered compared to Pirh2−/− and p53−/− mutants and consisted of adenocarcinomas, sarcomas, thymomas and T-cell lymphomas (Figure 8B, 8E and 8F; Table S2).
Examination of cells and tissues from healthy Pirh2−/−p53−/− mice indicated that these mice, similar to Pirh2−/− mice, exhibited elevated levels of c-Myc (Figure 8G and 8J). Western blot analysis also indicated elevated levels of c-Myc in Pirh2−/− tumors (Figure 8H and 8I); however the majority of these tumors did not show elevated levels of p19ARF (Figure 8I). In addition, similar to Pirh2−/− tumors, c-Myc levels were also elevated in Pirh2−/−p53−/− tumors (Figure 8J).
These data support Pirh2 function as a tumor suppressor and demonstrate that tumorigenesis of Pirh2 deficient mice is exacerbated by the loss of p53.
Discussion
Ubiquitylation plays critical roles in the regulation of stability and function of p53 and c-Myc, two of the most important tumor suppressors and oncogenes, respectively. Several E3 ligases have been shown to regulate p53 stability [5]; however, the physiological functions of most of these E3 ligases have not yet been addressed. Mdm2 is well accepted as the master regulator for p53 stability and has been demonstrated for its requirement for embryonic and postnatal development [11]–[13], [47]. Previous studies also indicated that while Mdm2 is required for p53 stability due to its central role in the polyubiquitylation and degradation of p53 [13], [17], Mdm2 independent regulation of p53 degradation also exists. In this study we report that in contrast to Mdm2 deficiency, absence of Pirh2 did not affect embryonic development and only mildly affected p53 steady state levels. However, in response to DNA damage and despite the presence of other E3 ligases for p53 (e.g. Mdm2), Pirh2 deficiency resulted in higher p53 levels in several tissues. Although, we cannot exclude a tissue specificity for the increased IR-induced p53 expression in the absence of Pirh2, collectively our current data indicate a role for Pirh2 in the regulation of p53 stability in response to DNA damage and support a model in which different E3 ligases regulate p53 turnover in a developmental, tissue, stress or time specific manners.
The oncogene c-MYC is frequently deregulated in human cancer [7] and similar to p53, its stability and function are regulated by a number of posttranslational modifications including ubiquitylation. SKP2, FBW7 and ARF-BP1 have been demonstrated to mediate c-MYC ubiquitylation [2], [6]. In this study we identified c-MYC as a novel interacting protein for PIRH2 and demonstrated that this interaction requires both the N- and C-terminal domains of PIRH2 as well as the MBII and the C-terminal domain of c-MYC. Similar to its interaction with PIRH2, c-MYC interaction with SKP2 also involves both its MBII and C-terminal domain [22], [23].
In this study, we also demonstrate that PIRH2 polyubiquitylates c-MYC and that this c-Myc polyubiquitylation controls c-MYC stability and proteolysis. Pirh2 deficient murine cells and tumors, and human RKO cells knocked down for PIRH2, displayed significantly elevated levels of c-Myc protein, supporting that ubiquitylation control of c-Myc turnover is not only mediated by Skp2 and Fbw7, but also involves Pirh2. Our in vitro data showing that PIRH2 interacts with c-MYC and mediates its polyubiquitylation strongly support a direct role for this E3 ligase in c-MYC polyubiquitylation and degradation.
The embryonic lethality of Fbw7 mutant mice [48] and the postnatal developmental defects of Skp2 mutants [49], [50] contrast with the normal embryonic and postnatal development observed with Pirh2 mutants. These developmental differences, together with the differential requirement for these E3 ligases for cancer suppression [2], [43], highlight the complex in vivo functions of these E3 ligases.
Although c-Myc protein level was elevated in all examined tissues of Pirh2−/− mice, spleen, testis and mammary glands displayed the highest levels of c-Myc. In agreement with the upregulation of p19ARF in response to high levels of deregulated c-Myc [21], spleen, testis and mammary glands of Pirh2−/− mice displayed increased p19ARF expression. However, p19ARF expression was not increased in Pirh2 −/− tissues (e.g. lung, liver) that only displayed a moderate elevation of c-Myc expression. As c-Myc induced p19ARF expression results in the sequestration of mdm2 in the nucleolus and the subsequent activation of p53 [51], it is possible that increased levels of c-Myc and p19ARF in Pirh2−/− mice might contribute to their higher IR-induced p53 responses compared to control littermates. However, our observation that liver of Pirh2−/− mice display elevated IR-induced p53 expression compared to Wt controls whithout any detectable level of p19ARF, supports that increased IR-induced p53 expression in Pirh2 mutants can take place independently of p19ARF. Further biochemical and genetic studies are required to determine whether the increased expression of c-Myc and p19ARF in Pirh2 deficient cells affects their p53 responses.
Our finding that Pirh2 polyubiquitylates c-Myc and mediates its proteolysis, and the elevated c-Myc level associated with Pirh2 deficiency support the possibility that deregulated c-Myc in Pirh2−/− mice may increase their cancer susceptibility. Indeed, Pirh2 mutant mice displayed increased predisposition to develop tumors including sarcomas, testis, mammary and lung tumors. In accordance with the role p53 plays in suppressing c-Myc induced oncogenesis [46], Pirh2−/−p53−/− mice showed a markedly increased cancer predisposition compared to single mutants. The accumulation of c-Myc in Pirh2 mutant mice is also consistent with their elevated risk for developping plasma cell hyperplasia, gammaglobulinemia and kidney failure [36]–[38].
Human PIRH2 has been reported to be overexpressed in lung and prostate cancer [24], [25]. However, the human PIRH2 locus at 4q21 is lost in a diverse subset of solid tumors including epithelial tumors of the breast and lung [52], [53]. We report in this study that PIRH2 expression is downregulated in various human cancers and that lower PIRH2 expression correlates with decreased survival of patients with lung squamous cell carcinomas, breast or ovarian cancer. Interestingly, Pirh2 mutant mice also displayed increased risk for lung and breast cancer.
The ability of the E3 ligase Pirh2 to negatively regulate IR-induced p53 and c-Myc steady state level, together with the increased risk for Pirh2 mutant mice to develop various pathologies, including cancer, all highlight the importance of this novel tumor suppressor and demonstrate the requirement for its tight regulation.
Materials and Methods
Generation Pirh2 Mutant Cells and Mice
E14K embryonic stem cells were electroporated with the linearized targeting construct for Pirh2 (Figure S1) and Pirh2fl2-3-neo ES clones identified by PCR and Southern blotting. Pirh2Δ2-3 ES clones lacking exon 2 and 3 and the Neomycin resistance cassette were obtained following transient transfection of two targeted Pirh2fl2-3-neo ES clones with CMV-Cre recombinase. Pirh2Δ2-3 ES clones were used to derive two independent lines of mutant mice (referred here as Pirh2 mutants). All mice were in 129/C57BL/6 genetic background and were maintained in the animal facility of the Ontario Cancer Institute in accordance with the established ethical care regulations of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. P53 mutant mice [54] were obtained from Taconic.
MEFs were derived according to standard procedures. HEK293T cells, RKO cells and PIRH2-KD RKO clone #11 in which PIRH2 can be knocked down by a tetracycline-inducible system [16], have been also used.
Flow Cytometry
Single cell suspensions from thymi, spleens, lymph nodes and bone marrow of Wt and Pirh2 mutant mice were stained with the following antibodies against the cell surface markers: CD4, CD8, CD3, CD43, CD95, CD138, IgM, IgD, B220, and Thy1.2 (ebioscience and Pharmingen). Stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using the FACScan and Cellquest software.
Cell Activation Assay
Activation of T and B-cells was performed as previously described [55].
Quantitative Real Time PCR and Genomic PCR
Cells were harvested and total RNA isolated with Trizol (Gibco). cDNA was generated using Invitrogen kit. SYBR green kit from Applied Biosystems was used for Real-time PCR. The following oligonucleotides were used: Actin (5′AACAGGAAGCCCATCACCATCTT3′ and 5′GCCCTTCCACAATGCCAAAGTT3′), IL-6 (5′TAGTCCTTCCTACCCCAATTTCC3′ and 5′TTGGTCCTTAGCCACTCCTTC3′), c-Myc (5′ATGCCCCTCAACGTGAACTTC3′ and 5′CGCAACATAGGATGGAGAGCA3′), Ccna2 (5′GCCTTCACCATTCATGTGGAT3′ and 5′TTGCTGCGGGTAAAGAGACAG3′), Ccnd2 (5′GAGTGGGAACTGGTAGTGTTG3′ and 5′CGCACAGAGCGATGAAGGT3′), E2f1 (5′CAGAACCTATGGCTAGGGAGT3′ and 5′GATCCAGCCTCCGTTTCACC3′), Mcl-1 (5′AAAGGCGGCTGCATAAGTC3′ and 5′TGGCGGTATAGGTCGTCCTC3′), p21 (5′CCTGGTGATGTCCGACCTG5′ and 5′CCATGAGCGCATCGCAATC3′), Puma (5′CCTGGGTAAGGGGAGGAGT3′ and 5′AGCAGCACTTAGAGTCGCC3′), Brca1 (5′AAGGAGCCCGTGTGCTTAG3′ and 5′TTGCCCTAGATGTGTTGTCTTTT3′), and Pirh2 (5′CAGACTTGTGAAGACTGTAGCAC3′ and 5′ CGAAGATTCGTGGTTAGGCAT3′). PCR were performed on the Applied Biosystem 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR system.
GST Pull-Down Assays
Recombinant purified full length PIRH2 and its fragments were incubated with His-c-MYC fusion proteins in an assay buffer containing PBS (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM Benzamidine, 0.5 mM PMSF and 5 mM βME in a 1∶2 molar ratio at 4°C overnight. Then, proteins were incubated with the 100 µl of glutathione-Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) for an additional 2 h. The mixture was transferred to a microcolumn and was extensively washed with the assay buffer. Bound proteins were eluted with 30 mM reduced glutathione and detected by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining
Western Blot and Immunoprecipitation Analysis
Western blot analysis was performed as previously described [55]. The following antibodies were used: c-Myc (C33 and N262; Santa Cruz), Ccnd2 (Santa Cruz), PIRH2 (Santa Cruz and BETHYL laboratories), SKP2 (Santa Cruz), FBW7 (Sigma), p19ARF (Novus and Calbiochem), and anti-β-actin (Sigma).
HEK293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding human PIRH2 (pcDNA3-hPIRH2) and c-MYC (pcDNA3-c-MYC) using the calcium phosphate method. After 48 h, the cells were lysed in a solution containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton-X, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 400 µM Na3VO4 and protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche). The cell lysates from transfected HEK293T and non transfected NIH3T3 were centrifuged at 14,000×g for 10 min at 4°C, and the resulting supernatant was incubated with anti-c-MYC antibody (N-262) for 2 h at 4°C. Protein G-Sepharose (Amersham) was added to the mixture and the sample rotated overnight at 4°C. The resin was separated by centrifugation, washed four times with ice-cold lysis buffer, and then boiled in SDS sample buffer. Immunoblot analysis was performed with the anti-hPIRH2 (BETHYL laboratories) or anti-c-MYC antibody (mouse monoclonal antibody; 9E10), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies to mouse or rabbit immunoglobulin G (1∶10,000 dilutions, Cell Signaling) and an enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL, Amersham). Immunoprecipitation of endogenous PIRH2 from RKO cells was performed using anti-PIRH2 antibody from Santa Cruz (FL261). pcDNA3-hPIRH2 was transfected in RKO cells using the calcium phosphate method.
Intracellular Ubiquitylation Assay
HEK293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding the full length or a mutant lacking the ring finger domain (ΔR) of human PRIH2 together with Wt or T58A c-MYC and HA-tagged ubiquitin by the calcium phosphate method. After 48 h, the cells were lysed in a modified RIPA buffer as described earlier. The cell lysates were centrifuged at 14,000×g for 10 min at 4°C, and the resulting supernatant was incubated with anti-c-MYC antibody (N262) for 2 h at 4°C. Protein G-Sepharose was added to the mixture, which was then rotated overnight at 4°C. The resin was separated by centrifugation, washed four times with ice-cold lysis buffer, and then boiled in SDS sample buffer. Immunoblot analysis was performed with the anti-ubiquitin (FK2; BIOMOL international) or anti-c-MYC antibody (9E10), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies to mouse or rabbit immunoglobulin G and ECL.
In Vivo Ubiquitylation Assay
Splenocytes from Wt and Pirh2−/− 8 week-old mice were cultured in the presence or absence of anti-IgM (20 µg/ml) and/or MG132 (20 µM; calbiochem) for 3 h. Cells were then lysed in a modified RIPA buffer as described earlier and cell lysates immunoprecipitated with anti-c-Myc antibody (N262). The immunocomplexes were denatured in Laemmli's sample buffer (25 mM Tris pH 8.3, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS) to dissociate contaminant proteins associated with c-MYC. c-MYC proteins were reimmunoprecipitated (2nd IP) with anti-c-Myc antibody. The resin was separated by centrifugation, washed four times with ice-cold lysis buffer, and then boiled in SDS sample buffer. Immunoblot analyses were performed with the anti-ubiquitin (FK2) or anti-c-Myc antibody (9E10), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies to mouse immunoglobulin G and ECL.
In Vitro Ubiquitylation Assay
Human ubiquitin activating enzyme E1 and 6xHis tagged ubiquitin were purchased from Boston Biochem. The ubiquitylation reaction was performed in a volume of 20 µL in a buffer of 50 mM Tris pH 7.6, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM ATP, 2 mM DTT. The reaction mixture typically contained E1 (50 ng, Calbiochem), UBE2D2/UbcH5b (100 ng), Ubiquitin (5 µg, Sigma), Pirh2 (1 µg) and full-length c-Myc (0.5 to 1 µg). After incubation at 30°C for 1.5 h, the reactions were stopped by addition of SDS-PAGE sample buffer and resolved on 7.5–10% SDS-PAGE gels. Ubiquitylated proteins were visualized and evaluated by Western Blot using anti-c-MYC (N262) and anti-Ub antibody (U0508, Sigma).
Immunohistochemistry
Tissues and tumors fixed in buffered formalin were processed for paraffin-embedded sectioning at 5 µm, and stained with H&E (Fisher). IHC was performed using anti-c-Myc (C19, Santa Cruz), anti-cleaved caspase 3 (Cell Signaling) or Ki67 (Dako). TUNEL staining was performed using an in situ cell death detection kit (Boehringer Mannheim).
Microarray Data Analysis
Microarray data from public studies were downloaded from GEO [26]–[30]. All data was log2 transformed and normalized according to the original authors, with the exception of the lung adenocarcinoma dataset, whose pre-processing has been described elsewhere [56]. Unadjusted Cox proportional hazards models were fit in the R statistical environment (v2.6.2) using the survival package (v2.34). P-values were calculated using the Wald test. Correlation analyses used Pearson's correlation as implemented in R (v2.6.2). Scatter- and box-plots were generated using the lattice package (v0.17–4). Long-term (>7 years) vs. short-term survival groups in ovarian cancer dataset [29] were analyzed using a t-test with Welch's adjustment for heteroscedascity. We have used all 25 long-term and all 30 short-term survival samples available from the raw data. Analyzing only strictly long- and strictly short-term survival samples (n = 23 and n = 27 respectively) does not change the average expression and standard error; it only reduces the significance to p = 0.002162. Additional data were considered from Oncomine Research Edition v.3.6, with statistical analysis as described previously [32].
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank S. Trudel, D. Tkachuk, B. Neel, M. Tsao, T. Kislinger, and B. Bandarchi-Chamkhaleh for helpful discussions. We also thank R. Rottapel, Keiko, and Keichi Nakayama for providing reagents and W. I. López Bähr for technical help.
Footnotes
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
This work was supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (RH and SB), the National Cancer Institute of Canada-Terry Fox program project grant (RH and SB), and the Canadian Cancer Society (SB). RH was supported by a salary award from the Canadian Institute of Health Research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Welchman RL, Gordon C, Mayer RJ. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins as multifunctional signals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:599–609. doi: 10.1038/nrm1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nakayama KI, Nakayama K. Ubiquitin ligases: cell-cycle control and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:369–381. doi: 10.1038/nrc1881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hoeller D, Hecker CM, Dikic I. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins in cancer pathogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:776–788. doi: 10.1038/nrc1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brooks CL, Gu W. p53 ubiquitination: Mdm2 and beyond. Mol Cell. 2006;21:307–315. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dai C, Gu W. p53 post-translational modification: deregulated in tumorigenesis. Trends Mol Med. 2010;16:528–536. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Muller J, Eilers M. Ubiquitination of Myc: proteasomal degradation and beyond. Ernst Schering Found Symp Proc. 2008:99–113. doi: 10.1007/2789_2008_103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nesbit CE, Tersak JM, Prochownik EV. MYC oncogenes and human neoplastic disease. Oncogene. 1999;18:3004–3016. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Abe K, Hattori T, Isobe T, Kitagawa K, Oda T, et al. Pirh2 interacts with and ubiquitylates signal recognition particle receptor beta subunit. Biomed Res. 2008;29:53–60. doi: 10.2220/biomedres.29.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen D, Kon N, Li M, Zhang W, Qin J, et al. ARF-BP1/Mule is a critical mediator of the ARF tumor suppressor. Cell. 2005;121:1071–1083. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Finkin S, Aylon Y, Anzi S, Oren M, Shaulian E. Fbw7 regulates the activity of endoreduplication mediators and the p53 pathway to prevent drug-induced polyploidy. Oncogene. 2008;27:4411–4421. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jones SN, Roe AE, Donehower LA, Bradley A. Rescue of embryonic lethality in Mdm2-deficient mice by absence of p53. Nature. 1995;378:206–208. doi: 10.1038/378206a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Montes de Oca Luna R, Wagner DS, Lozano G. Rescue of early embryonic lethality in mdm2-deficient mice by deletion of p53. Nature. 1995;378:203–206. doi: 10.1038/378203a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ringshausen I, O'Shea CC, Finch AJ, Swigart LB, Evan GI. Mdm2 is critically and continuously required to suppress lethal p53 activity in vivo. Cancer Cell. 2006;10:501–514. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Leng RP, Lin Y, Ma W, Wu H, Lemmers B, et al. Pirh2, a p53-induced ubiquitin-protein ligase, promotes p53 degradation. Cell. 2003;112:779–791. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00193-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vousden KH, Lane DP. p53 in health and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:275–283. doi: 10.1038/nrm2147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jung YS, Liu G, Chen X. Pirh2 E3 ubiquitin ligase targets DNA polymerase eta for 20S proteasomal degradation. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:1041–1048. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01198-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kruse JP, Gu W. Modes of p53 regulation. Cell. 2009;137:609–622. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dumaz N, Meek DW. Serine15 phosphorylation stimulates p53 transactivation but does not directly influence interaction with HDM2. EMBO J. 1999;18:7002–7010. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.24.7002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ashcroft M, Kubbutat MH, Vousden KH. Regulation of p53 function and stability by phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:1751–1758. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.3.1751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Meyer N, Penn LZ. Reflecting on 25 years with MYC. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:976–990. doi: 10.1038/nrc2231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Murphy DJ, Junttila MR, Pouyet L, Karnezis A, Shchors K, et al. Distinct thresholds govern Myc's biological output in vivo. Cancer Cell. 2008;14:447–457. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim SY, Herbst A, Tworkowski KA, Salghetti SE, Tansey WP. Skp2 regulates Myc protein stability and activity. Mol Cell. 2003;11:1177–1188. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00173-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.von der Lehr N, Johansson S, Wu S, Bahram F, Castell A, et al. The F-box protein Skp2 participates in c-Myc proteosomal degradation and acts as a cofactor for c-Myc-regulated transcription. Mol Cell. 2003;11:1189–1200. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00193-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Duan W, Gao L, Druhan LJ, Zhu WG, Morrison C, et al. Expression of Pirh2, a newly identified ubiquitin protein ligase, in lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1718–1721. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Logan IR, Gaughan L, McCracken SR, Sapountzi V, Leung HY, et al. Human PIRH2 enhances androgen receptor signaling through inhibition of histone deacetylase 1 and is overexpressed in prostate cancer. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:6502–6510. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00147-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang Y, Klijn JG, Zhang Y, Sieuwerts AM, Look MP, et al. Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet. 2005;365:671–679. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17947-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chin K, DeVries S, Fridlyand J, Spellman PT, Roydasgupta R, et al. Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. Cancer Cell. 2006;10:529–541. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bild AH, Yao G, Chang JT, Wang Q, Potti A, et al. Oncogenic pathway signatures in human cancers as a guide to targeted therapies. Nature. 2006;439:353–357. doi: 10.1038/nature04296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Berchuck A, Iversen ES, Lancaster JM, Pittman J, Luo J, et al. Patterns of gene expression that characterize long-term survival in advanced stage serous ovarian cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:3686–3696. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Potti A, Mukherjee S, Petersen R, Dressman HK, Bild A, et al. A genomic strategy to refine prognosis in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:570–580. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Raponi M, Zhang Y, Yu J, Chen G, Lee G, et al. Gene expression signatures for predicting prognosis of squamous cell and adenocarcinomas of the lung. Cancer Res. 2006;66:7466–7472. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rhodes DR, Yu J, Shanker K, Deshpande N, Varambally R, et al. ONCOMINE: a cancer microarray database and integrated data-mining platform. Neoplasia. 2004;6:1–6. doi: 10.1016/s1476-5586(04)80047-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hendrix ND, Wu R, Kuick R, Schwartz DR, Fearon ER, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 9 has oncogenic activity and is a downstream target of Wnt signaling in ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1354–1362. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Korkola JE, Houldsworth J, Chadalavada RS, Olshen AB, Dobrzynski D, et al. Down-regulation of stem cell genes, including those in a 200-kb gene cluster at 12p13.31, is associated with in vivo differentiation of human male germ cell tumors. Cancer Res. 2006;66:820–827. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sanchez-Carbayo M, Socci ND, Lozano J, Saint F, Cordon-Cardo C. Defining molecular profiles of poor outcome in patients with invasive bladder cancer using oligonucleotide microarrays. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:778–789. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rutsch S, Neppalli VT, Shin DM, DuBois W, Morse HC, 3rd, et al. IL-6 and MYC collaborate in plasma cell tumor formation in mice. Blood. 2010;115:1746–1754. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-237941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.McCormack SJ, Weaver Z, Deming S, Natarajan G, Torri J, et al. Myc/p53 interactions in transgenic mouse mammary development, tumorigenesis and chromosomal instability. Oncogene. 1998;16:2755–2766. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chesi M, Robbiani DF, Sebag M, Chng WJ, Affer M, et al. AID-dependent activation of a MYC transgene induces multiple myeloma in a conditional mouse model of post-germinal center malignancies. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:167–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nishimoto N, Kishimoto T. Interleukin 6: from bench to bedside. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006;2:619–626. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Adhikary S, Marinoni F, Hock A, Hulleman E, Popov N, et al. The ubiquitin ligase HectH9 regulates transcriptional activation by Myc and is essential for tumor cell proliferation. Cell. 2005;123:409–421. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Momand J, Jung D, Wilczynski S, Niland J. The MDM2 gene amplification database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:3453–3459. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.15.3453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dornan D, Bheddah S, Newton K, Ince W, Frantz GD, et al. COP1, the negative regulator of p53, is overexpressed in breast and ovarian adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7226–7230. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Onoyama I, Tsunematsu R, Matsumoto A, Kimura T, de Alboran IM, et al. Conditional inactivation of Fbxw7 impairs cell-cycle exit during T cell differentiation and results in lymphomatogenesis. J Exp Med. 2007;204:2875–2888. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Li L, Halaby MJ, Hakem A, Cardoso R, El Ghamrasni S, et al. Rnf8 deficiency impairs class switch recombination, spermatogenesis, and genomic integrity and predisposes for cancer. J Exp Med. 2010;207:983–997. doi: 10.1084/jem.20092437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Greenblatt MS, Bennett WP, Hollstein M, Harris CC. Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res. 1994;54:4855–4878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schmitt CA, McCurrach ME, de Stanchina E, Wallace-Brodeur RR, Lowe SW. INK4a/ARF mutations accelerate lymphomagenesis and promote chemoresistance by disabling p53. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2670–2677. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.20.2670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Itahana K, Mao H, Jin A, Itahana Y, Clegg HV, et al. Targeted inactivation of Mdm2 RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligase activity in the mouse reveals mechanistic insights into p53 regulation. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:355–366. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tsunematsu R, Nakayama K, Oike Y, Nishiyama M, Ishida N, et al. Mouse Fbw7/Sel-10/Cdc4 is required for notch degradation during vascular development. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:9417–9423. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312337200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nakayama K, Nagahama H, Minamishima YA, Matsumoto M, Nakamichi I, et al. Targeted disruption of Skp2 results in accumulation of cyclin E and p27(Kip1), polyploidy and centrosome overduplication. EMBO J. 2000;19:2069–2081. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.9.2069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yada M, Hatakeyama S, Kamura T, Nishiyama M, Tsunematsu R, et al. Phosphorylation-dependent degradation of c-Myc is mediated by the F-box protein Fbw7. EMBO J. 2004;23:2116–2125. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Weber JD, Taylor LJ, Roussel MF, Sherr CJ, Bar-Sagi D. Nucleolar Arf sequesters Mdm2 and activates p53. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:20–26. doi: 10.1038/8991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Baudis M. Online database and bioinformatics toolbox to support data mining in cancer cytogenetics. Biotechniques. 2006;40:269–270, 272. doi: 10.2144/000112102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mitelman FJBaMF. Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations in Cancer. 2008.
- 54.Donehower LA, Harvey M, Slagle BL, McArthur MJ, Montgomery CA, Jr, et al. Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours. Nature. 1992;356:215–221. doi: 10.1038/356215a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Salmena L, Lemmers B, Hakem A, Matysiak-Zablocki E, Murakami K, et al. Essential role for caspase 8 in T-cell homeostasis and T-cell-mediated immunity. Genes Dev. 2003;17:883–895. doi: 10.1101/gad.1063703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lau SK, Boutros PC, Pintilie M, Blackhall FH, Zhu CQ, et al. Three-gene prognostic classifier for early-stage non small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5562–5569. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.0352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.