Abstract
Limited information indicates that the regulatory factor X1 (RFX1), the prototype member of the transcription factor RFX family, may play a role in the central nervous system. Our recent study showed that knockout of the Rfx1 gene led to early embryonic lethality. Here, we showed that the heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice were fertile and grew normally. An abundant amount of RFX1 proteins were expressed in the olfactory bulb, hippocampus and cerebral cortex as detected by β-galactosidase staining (the gene knockout vector contained a coding region for β-galactosidase) and immunofluorescent staining with an anti-RFX1 antibody. RFX1 positive immunostaining was mainly in the nuclei of neurons and microglial cells and was absent in astrocytes of mouse brains. The heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice expressed RFX1 mRNA and proteins at a level similar to that in the wild-type mice in the olfactory bulb and hippocampus. The expression level of RFX1 proteins was similar in the brains of mice that were ranged from 15-day old embryos to 4-month old adults. Our results suggest a significant expression of RFX1 proteins in the mammalian brain. This expression is cell-type and brain-region specific and may take a random monoallelic expression pattern.
Keywords: brain, microglial cells, mouse, neurons, regulatory factor X1
Introduction
The regulatory factor X (RFX) proteins are unique transcription factors that contain a highly conserved 76-amino acid DNA binding domain. This domain can bind X-box consensus sequences in the promoter regions of various genes [1]. Seven RFX proteins (named RXF1-7) have been identified so far in mammals [2]. Their functions are beginning to be revealed. For example, RFX5 can regulate the expression of the major histocompatibility complex class II genes [3] and knockout of Rfx3 gene causes severe ciliopathies leading to diabetes and left-right asymmetry specification [4,5].
RFX1 is the prototype member of the RFX family. Our recent study has shown that knockout of the Rfx1 gene in mice leads to early embryonic lethality [6], suggesting an essential role of RFX1 in the early embryonic development/survival. Knockout of Rfx homologue in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila results in severe sensory defects [7,8]. Among mammalian organs and tissues that were examined, the highest expression level of RFX1 mRNA is in the brain [2]. We have also shown that RFX1 proteins are expressed in the neurons of rat brain and can regulate the expression of the neuronally expressed glutamate transporter type 3 [9]. These results suggest an important role of RFX1 in the central nervous system. However, detailed study on RFX1 expression profile in the brain has not been reported. As an initial step to understand the biological function of RFX1 in mammalian brains, we studied the expression of RFX1 proteins in the mouse brain. We used the RFX1 mutant mice generated in our previous study [6] to take advantage that RFX1 expression can be studied not only by routine techniques, such as Western blotting, but also by LacZ (β-galactosidase) staining because those mice have a β-galactosidase gene whose expression is under the control of Rfx1 promoter.
Materials and Methods
Animals
As we described before [6], RFX1 mutant mice were generated by using the gene trap technique with the embryonic stem cell clone RRO347 [Rfx1Gt(RRO347)Byg]. The gene trap vector was pGT2Lxf that contained a coding region for LacZ and was inserted into the intron sequence between the exon 2 and exon 3. The produced mice were on C57Bl/6J × 129 gene background and were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at the age of 18 days. The Rfx1+/− mice were mated and the wild-type Rfx1+/+ and heterozygous Rfx1+/− offspring of the third and fourth generations were used in this study.
Body weighing
Four litters of mice including 15 heterozygous Rfx1+/− and 9 wild-type Rfx1+/+ mice were weighed at 1, 4, 7, 21, 35 and 60 days after birth. The mice were returned to the cages with their mothers immediately after weighing.
Brain sectioning
Ten of seven-week old heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice were euthanized by isoflurane and transcardiacally perfused by cold normal saline. For immunofluorescent staining, the mice (5 mice) then were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.4) and the brains were post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 24 h at 4°C. The brains that were fixed by paraformaldehyde (for immunofluorescent staining) or were not exposed to paraformaldehyde (for β-galactosidase staining, 5 mice) were immersed sequentially in 10, 20, and 30% of sucrose-phosphate buffer solution. Finally, 14 μm-thick cryostat coronal sections were obtained for β-galactosidase staining or immunofluorescent staining.
β-galactosidase staining
β-galactosidase staining was performed using the β-Gal Staining Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacture’s instruction with minor modifications. Briefly, brain sections were fixed with a fixative solution containing 2% formaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. After being rinsed twice, staining solution was added to the sections and incubated for 2 h at 37°C and then at 4°C overnight.
Immunofluorescent staining
Antigen retrieval with microwave heating for 15 min in 10 mM tri-sodium citrate buffer (pH = 6.0) containing 0.05% tween-20 was performed as described before [10,11]. After being cooled at room temperature, the sections were blocked with 5% donkey serum in PBS containing 0.1% triton-X 100 and 0.05% tween-20. For single- or double-labeled immunofluorescent staining, the following primary antibodies were used: rabbit polyclonal anti-RFX1 (1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-microtubule-associate protein 2 (MAP2) (1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), rat monoclonal anti-cluster of differentiation molecule 11b (CD11b) (1:100; Abcam), mouse monoclonal anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (1:600; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). After being incubated with the primary antibodies at 4°C overnight, the Cy3-conjugated goat polyclonal anti-rabbit serum (1:100, Abcam) or Alexa Flour 488-labeled goat anti-mouse/rat serum secondary antibody (1:1000, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was applied for 1 h at room temperature. Negative control sections were incubated with PBS as a substitute for primary antibody.
Western blotting
Each of seven weeks old heterozygous mice was gender-matched with a wild-type mouse from the same litter. These heterozygous Rfx1+/− and wild-type Rfx1+/+ mice were euthanized by isoflurane and transcardiacally perfused by cold normal saline. Their olfactory bulbs and hippocampi were harvested. Total lysates of these brain regions (50 μg proteins per lane) were subjected to Western analysis as we described before [12]. The primary antibodies used were the rabbit polyclonal anti-RFX1 antibody (1:5000 dilution, a gift from Dr. Patrick Hearing, State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY, USA) and the rabbit polyclonal anti-actin antibody (1:5000 dilution; catalog number: A2066; Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO, USA). The protein bands were visualized with the enhanced chemiluminescence methods. Quantitative analysis of the protein bands was performed using an ImageQuant 5.0 GE Healthcare Densitometer (GE Healthcare, Sunnyvale, CA). The densities of RFX1 protein bands were normalized to those of actin in the same sample to control for errors in protein sample loading and transferring during Western analysis. The result of each mouse then was normalized by the mean values of wild-type mice in the same experiments.
To determine the developmental brain expression profile of RFX1, cerebral hemispheres were harvested from wild-type C57Bl/6J mouse (Charles River Laboratories; Wilmington, MA, USA) embryos at embryonic day 15. Hippocampi also were harvested from 1 week, 1 month or 4 months old wild-type C57Bl/6J mice. These brain tissues were subjected to Western blotting to determine RFX1 protein expression.
Real-time PCR
Real-time PCR was performed as we described previously [13]. Total RNA was extracted from the olfactory bulbs and hippocampi of 7 week old mice using an RNeasy micro kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). As for Western blotting, littermates of the heterozygous and wild-type mice that were gender-matched were used in this study. Primers for real-time PCR were designed based on reported sequence of mouse Rfx1 gene using the Primer Express 3.0 software (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA) and selected to best fit the requirement of SYBR Green assays. The sequences of the primers are: forward, AGTGAGGCTCCACCACTGGCCG and reverse, TGGGCAGCCGCTTCTC. The sequences corresponding to these two primers in the Rfx1 gene are in exon 14 and exon 15, respectively. Quantitative PCRs were carried out in triplicate using each cDNA sample that was equivalent to 50 ng of starting total RNA. Amplifying PCR and monitoring of the fluorescent emission in real-time were performed in the ABI Prism 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). To verify that only a single PCR product was amplified per transcript, dissociation curve data was analyzed through the 7900HT Sequence Detection Software. To account for possible differences in starting material, quantitative PCR of the housekeeping genes glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and actin was also carried out for each cDNA sample. The relative amount of RFX1 mRNA in each sample was determined using the comparative threshold cycle method and then normalized to those of house keeping genes.
Statistical analysis
Western blotting and real-time PCR results were presented as means ± SD and were analyzed by t-test. A P ≤ 0.05 was accepted as significant.
Results
The heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice appeared normal. Their growth curve overlapped with that of the wild-type mice (Fig. 1), suggesting that there was no growth retardation in the heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice.
Fig. 1. Body weights of the heterozygous Rfx1+/− and wild-type littermates.
Results are means ± SD [n = 15 for the heterozygous (10 females/5 males) and 9 for the wild-type mice (5 females/4 males)].
Since the β-galactosidase expression in the heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice is under the control of the Rfx1 promoter, the expression of β-galactosidase reflects the specific expression of RFX1. Brain sections from each of the five heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice that were used to cut sections all were β-galactosidase staining positive. β-galactosidase staining was prominent in the olfactory bulb, cerebral cortex and hippocampus. A significant amount of β-galactosidase staining also appeared in the striatum (Fig. 2). These brain regions were positively stained by immunofluorescent cytochemistry with the anti-RFX1 antibody (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2. β-galactosidase staining of the heterozygous Rfx1+/− mouse brain sections.
The brain sections are arranged from rostrum to caudum in the order of panel A to panel D. Positive staining of β-galactosidase is blue and is pointed by an arrow. The arrow in panel A indicates anterior olfactory nucleus. The arrows in panel B indicate cerebral cortex and caudate putamen, respectively. The arrows in the panels C and D indicate cerebral cortex and hippocampus, respectively.
Fig. 3. Immunofluorecent staining of heterozygous Rfx1+/− mouse brain sections with an anti-RFX1 antibody.

Positive staining is in red fluorescence, is shown in the olfactory bulb (A), striatum (B), cerebral cortex (C) and hippocampus (D) and is pointed by an arrow. A triangle in panel B indicates a lateral ventricle.
To identify cell-type origin of RFX1 proteins, we used double-labeled immunofluorescent staining. As shown in figure 4, the RFX1 positive staining is co-localized with the staining of MAP2, a neuronal specific protein, and CD11b, a microglial cell specific protein. These results suggest that RFX1 is expressed in the neurons and microglial cells. The RFX1 positive staining was not co-localized with GFAP, an astrocyte specific protein. In addition, the RFX1 positive staining mainly appeared in the nuclei of neurons and microglial cells (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4. Immunofluorecent staining of heterozygous Rfx1+/− mouse brain sections.
Photographs were taken from cerebral cortex. RFX1 positive staining is in red fluorescence. Positive immunofluorescent staining for MAP2 (top panel), CD11b (middle panel) and GFAP (bottom panel) is in green fluorescence. There are three small panels in each large panel. Panel A shows positive staining for RFX1 proteins, panel B shows positive staining for MAP2, CD11b or GFAP, respectively, and panel C is the merged images of panel A and panel B.
Quantitative determination of RFX1 expression was performed in the olfactory bulb and hippocampus because these two brain structures expressed a significant amount of RFX1 proteins as described above. Also, these two structures represent functional diversity of the brain: olfactory bulb is involved in the sensory neurotransmission of smell and hippocampus plays an important role in learning and memory. There was no statistically significant difference in RFX1 mRNA and protein expression in the olfactory bulbs and hippocampi between the 7 week old heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice and the wild-type mice (Fig. 5). There was also no evidence of gender difference in RFX1 protein expression. For example, the relative RFX1 protein levels after being normalized by the results of actin were 1.02 ± 0.26 and 0.98 ± 0.22 (arbitrary unit), respectively, in the hippocampi of 7 week old male and female wild-type mice (P = 0.827, n = 4). In addition, there was no significant change in RFX1 protein expression in the brain tissues of the wild-type C57Bl/6J mice that were ranged from 15 day old embryos to 4 month old adult mice (Fig. 6), suggesting that RFX1 is maintained at a stable level throughout the period from late embryonic stage to adulthood.
Fig. 5. RFX1 mRNA and protein expression in the heterozygous Rfx1+/− and wild-type littermates.
Each heterozygous Rfx1+/− mouse was gender-matched with one wild-type mouse from the same litter. Their olfactory bulbs and hippocampi were isolated for real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. The relative RFX1 mRNA and protein abundance after being normalized by the results of actin in the same sample is presented in panel A and panel B, respectively. The protein results were further normalized by the mean values of wild-type littermates in the same Western blot. In panel B, a representative Western blot is presented in the left panels and the pooled results are presented as bar graph in the right panels. Results are means ± SD (n = 8 for each bar in the pooled results).
Fig. 6. RFX1 protein expression in the wild-type C57Bl/6J mice.
Cerebral hemispheres were harvested from embryos at embryonic day 15 (E15). Hippocampi also were harvested from 1 week, 1 month or 4 months old wild-type mice. They then were subjected to Western blotting. A representative Western blot is presented in the top panels and the pooled results of the relative RFX1 protein abundance after being normalized by the results of actin in the same sample and then the mean values of E15 embryos in the same blot are presented as bar graph in the bottom panels. Results are means ± SD (n = 6 for each bar in the pooled results).
Discussion
The mouse Rfx1 gene has 21 exons that produce a protein containing 963 amino acids [14]. The insertion of the gene trap vector in the embryonic stem cell clone RRO347A that was used to generate our mutant mice is in the intron between the exon 2 and exon 3. This insertion can result in production of a truncated protein that contains the first 97 amino acids of the RFX1 protein. Function domains, such as DNA binding and dimerization domains, that are important for RFX1 to function as a transcription factor are in the segments that start after the first 140 amino acids in the molecule [14]. Thus, the truncated proteins produced in our mutant mice should not have the functions of RFX1. Consistent with this loss-of-function concept, Rfx1 knockout leads to embryonic lethality prior to day 3.5 [6].
Currently, RFX1 functions are largely unknown. A few studies have indicated a role of RFX1 in the central nervous system [7–9]. However, there is only one study describing the distribution of RFX1 proteins in the mammalian brains in the literature [9]. The study showed by immunocytochemistry that RFX1 proteins were in the neurons of cerebral cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum of rats [9]. However, detailed investigation of the brain region distribution and cell type origin of RFX1 proteins were not performed in the study. Our current study suggests that olfactory bulb and striatum also express RFX1 protein in the mouse. In addition to neurons, RFX1 proteins are expressed in microglial cells. Consistent with the nature of transcription factors, the RFX1 proteins were mainly expressed in the nuclei. Interestingly, RFX1 expression in the brain does not change significantly from E15 to adult mice. RFX1 has been shown to regulate expression of early response genes and growth factors [15,16]. Our recent study showing embryonic lethality of Rfx1 knockout suggests a critical role of RFX1 in early embryonic development and cell survival [6]. In addition, we have shown that RFX1 regulates the expression of glutamate transporter type 3 [9], a neuron-specific glutamate transporter that is involved in regulating glutamate neurotransmission and learning and memory functions [17,18]. These findings suggest a broad range of functions of RFX1 in neurons. This suggestion is supported by a ubiquitous expression pattern of RFX1 in the brain as shown in this study.
A common rule that is generally assumed to control gene expression in diploid eukaryotic organisms is that maternally and paternally derived copies of each gene are simultaneously expressed at similar levels. However, it has been well-known that there is monoallelic expression pattern in which only one of the two alleles is expressed. Our results suggest that Rfx1 gene takes a monoallelic expression pattern in the brain because the heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice had a similar level of RFX1 mRNA and protein to that of the wild-type mice in the olfactory bulbs and hippocampi.
There are three classes of monoallelic expression patterns [19]. The first class includes X-inactivated genes. Regulation of RFX1 expression does not belong to this class because RFX1 gene is in chromosome 19 in human and chromosome 8 in mouse [20]. The second class consists of autosomal imprinted genes whose expression is controlled in a parent-of-origin-specific pattern [21]. Our previous study showed that knockout of Rfx1 gene expression leads to early embryonic death and the ratio of the wild-type mice to the heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice in the living mice of our large sample (154 mice) was about 1:2 [6]. If Rfx1 expression takes the form of imprinting to regulate its expression and this reprinting occurs very early in the embryonic development, we would expect a 1:1 ratio of the living heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice to the wild-type mice. If this reprinting happens later, we would expect that some of the heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice do not express RFX1 proteins. We examined RFX1 protein expression in the hippocampus and olfactory bulb by Western blotting. All of the heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice expressed RFX1 in these two brain regions and all 5 heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice whose brains were sectioned were β-galactosidase staining positive. Thus, RFX1 expression may not be regulated by reprinting in the brain. The last class of monoallelic expression is the random monoallelic expression of autosomal genes [19]. This group of genes takes a random form to control their gene expression: some cells express the maternal allele and the other cells express the paternal allele. In some cases/genes, cells express both alleles. The heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice and the wild-type mice expressed a similar level of RFX1 mRNA and proteins in the hippocampus and olfactory bulb and the brain regional distribution of RFX1 proteins and β-galactosidase is very similar in the brains of the heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice. Thus, RFX1 expression may take the form of random monoallelic expression in which cells express products from both alleles. However, our results can not completely exclude the possibility that RFX1 expression takes a biallelic pattern. The evidence to support this pattern is our findings that both alleles are expressed. Although a similar level of RFX1 in the heterozygous Rfx1+/− and wild-type littermates does not support the biallelic expression pattern, this finding can be due to the results of compensatory mechanisms to maintain a critical level of RFX1 in the heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice.
We have observed that the heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice appeared normal and did not have growth retardation. These findings are consistent with our results that the heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice did not have a significant change in the RFX1 protein expression in their brain.
In summary, we have shown that RFX1 proteins are abundantly expressed in the hippocampus, cerebral cortex and olfactory bulb and also are expressed in the striatum. The heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice have a similar level of RFX1 mRNA and proteins to that of the wild-type mice in the olfactory bulbs and hippocampi. These proteins are mainly expressed in the nuclei of neurons and microglial cells. These results, along with our previous findings that RFX1 is critical for embryonic development/survival and that the ratio of the living heterozygous Rfx1+/− mice to the wild-type mice is about 2:1 [6], suggest that Rfx1 takes the form of random monoallelic expression pattern to regulate its expression.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants (R01 GM065211 and R01 NS045983 to Z Zuo) from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, by a grant from the International Anesthesia Research Society (2007 Frontiers in Anesthesia Research Award to Z Zuo), Cleveland, Ohio and by the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia.
Abbreviations
- CD11b
cluster of differentiation molecule 11b
- GFAP
glial fibrillary acidic protein
- MAP2
microtubule-associate protein 2
- PBS
phosphate-buffered saline
- PCR
polymerase chain reaction
- RFX
regulatory factor X
Footnotes
This work was conducted at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing financial and other conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Gajiwala KS, Chen H, Cornille F, et al. Structure of the winged-helix protein hRFX1 reveals a new mode of DNA binding. Nature. 2000;403:916–921. doi: 10.1038/35002634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aftab S, Semenec L, Chu JS, Chen N. Identification and characterization of novel human tissue-specific RFX transcription factors. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:226. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clausen BE, Waldburger JM, Schwenk F, et al. Residual MHC class II expression on mature dendritic cells and activated B cells in RFX5-deficient mice. Immunity. 1998;8:143–155. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80467-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bonnafe E, Touka M, Ait-Lounis A, et al. The transcription factor RFX3 directs nodal cilium development and left-right asymmetry specification. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:4417–4427. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.10.4417-4427.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ait-Lounis A, Baas D, Barras E, et al. Novel function of the ciliogenic transcription factor RFX3 in development of the endocrine pancreas. Diabetes. 2007;56:950–959. doi: 10.2337/db06-1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Feng C, Xu W, Zuo Z. Knockout of the regulatory factor X1 gene leads to early embryonic lethality. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;386:715–717. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.06.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Swoboda P, Adler HT, Thomas JH. The RFX-type transcription factor DAF-19 regulates sensory neuron cilium formation in C. elegans. Mol Cell. 2000;5:411–421. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80436-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dubruille R, Laurencon A, Vandaele C, et al. Drosophila regulatory factor X is necessary for ciliated sensory neuron differentiation. Development. 2002;129:5487–5498. doi: 10.1242/dev.00148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ma K, Zheng S, Zuo Z. The transcription factor regulatory factor X1 increases the expression of neuronal glutamate transporter type 3. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:21250–21255. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600521200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Erber WN, Gibbs TA, Ivey JG. Antigen retrieval by microwave oven heating for immunohistochemical analysis of bone marrow trephine biopsies. Pathology (Phila) 1996;28:45–50. doi: 10.1080/00313029600169513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Taylor CR, Shi SR, Chen C, et al. Comparative study of antigen retrieval heating methods: microwave, microwave and pressure cooker, autoclave, and steamer. Biotech Histochem. 1996;71:263–270. doi: 10.3109/10520299609117171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li L, Peng L, Zuo Z. Isoflurane preconditioning increases B-cell lymphoma-2 expression and reduces cytochrome c release from the mitochondria in the ischemic penumbra of rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;586:106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.02.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zuo Z, Wang Y, Huang Y. Isoflurane preconditioning protects human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells against in vitro simulated ischemia-reperfusion through the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases pathway. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;542:84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reith W, Ucla C, Barras E, et al. RFX1, a transactivator of hepatitis B virus enhancer I, belongs to a novel family of homodimeric and heterodimeric DNA-binding proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:1230–1244. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.1230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang KR, Nemoto T, Yokota Y. RFX1 mediates the serum-induced immediate early response of Id2 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:26167–26177. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703448200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hsu YC, Liao WC, Kao CY, Chiu IM. Regulation of FGF1 gene promoter through transcription factor RFX1. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:13885–13895. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.081463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Danbolt NC. Glutamate uptake. Prog Neurobiol. 2001;65:1–105. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(00)00067-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Levenson J, Weeber E, Selcher JC, et al. Long-term potentiation and contextual fear conditioning increase neuronal glutamate uptake. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:155–161. doi: 10.1038/nn791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gimelbrant A, Hutchinson JN, Thompson BR, Chess A. Widespread monoallelic expression on human autosomes. Science. 2007;318:1136–1140. doi: 10.1126/science.1148910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Doyle J, Hoffman S, Ucla C, et al. Locations of human and mouse genes encoding the RFX1 and RFX2 transcription factor proteins. Genomics. 1996;35:227–230. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Reik W, Walter J. Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:21–32. doi: 10.1038/35047554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





