Background: Metacaspases are multifunctional cysteine peptidases.
Results: Trypanosoma brucei metacaspase 4 is a catalytically inactive metacaspase homologue required for parasite virulence, which interacts with an active parasite metacaspase during release from the cell.
Conclusion: Metacaspase 4 is a pseudopeptidase virulence factor.
Significance: Extracellular release and proteolytic processing provide novel insights into metacaspase function.
Keywords: Caspase, Cysteine Protease, Enzyme Mutation, Parasite, Secretion, Trypanosoma brucei, Pseudopeptidase, Virulence Factor, Cysteine Peptidase, Caspase Family
Abstract
Metacaspases are caspase family cysteine peptidases found in plants, fungi, and protozoa but not mammals. Trypanosoma brucei is unusual in having five metacaspases (MCA1–MCA5), of which MCA1 and MCA4 have active site substitutions, making them possible non-enzymatic homologues. Here we demonstrate that recombinant MCA4 lacks detectable peptidase activity despite maintaining a functional peptidase structure. MCA4 is expressed primarily in the bloodstream form of the parasite and associates with the flagellar membrane via dual myristoylation/palmitoylation. Loss of function phenotyping revealed critical roles for MCA4; rapid depletion by RNAi caused lethal disruption to the parasite's cell cycle, yet the generation of MCA4 null mutant parasites (Δmca4) was possible. Δmca4 had normal growth in axenic culture but markedly reduced virulence in mice. Further analysis revealed that MCA4 is released from the parasite and is specifically processed by MCA3, the only metacaspase that is both palmitoylated and enzymatically active. Accordingly, we have identified that the multiple metacaspases in T. brucei form a membrane-associated proteolytic cascade to generate a pseudopeptidase virulence factor.
Introduction
Metacaspases (MCAs)2 are clan CD, family C14B, cysteine peptidases identified in plants, fungi, and protozoa (1). They are predicted to be structurally similar to caspases with a caspase/hemoglobinase fold and a canonical histidine and cysteine dyad in the active site (1). MCAs differ from caspases in that they lack Asp specificity, having a strict arginine or lysine substrate specificity, and many are activated by calcium (2–4). Many MCAs undergo autocatalytic processing of the zymogen to produce a mature enzyme, although this processing is not necessarily required for enzymatic activity (2, 4, 5). The natural targets of MCAs are uncertain, with the proteolytic cleavage of Picea abies Tudor staphylococcal nuclease by the MCA mcII-Pa during embryogenesis and induced programmed cell death being the only in vivo action reported to date (6).
A seminal study that identified the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MCA (Yca1) as a positive regulator of program cell death (7) sparked great interest and paved the way for many subsequent descriptions of additional pro-death roles for MCAs (8). However, sustained research on MCAs of various organisms has revealed that they represent a functionally diverse family of peptidases. The single MCAs of S. cerevisiae and Leishmania major apparently harbor a capacity for multifunctionality. Yca1 is implicated in both cell cycle regulation (9) and the clearance of insoluble protein aggregates (10), whereas the MCA of L. major is required for cell cycle progression (11) in addition to having a role in PCD induced by oxidative stress (12). Furthermore, the antagonistic relationship of two Arabidopsis thaliana MCAs in the hypersensitive response cell death pathway (AtMC1 promotes cell death, whereas AtMC2 functions as a negative regulator) reveals the potential of MCAs for complex connections in key regulatory processes (13).
Trypanosoma brucei unusually has five metacaspase genes (MCA1 to MCA5), only three of which (MCA2, MCA3, and MCA5) encode proteins with the canonical histidine-cysteine catalytic dyad and are therefore predicted to be catalytically active (14, 15). Investigation into these MCAs revealed collective essentiality for bloodstream form parasites; simultaneous RNAi depletion caused rapid cell death attributed to accumulation of abnormal cell types resulting from a precytokinesis defect (16). Despite this severe phenotype resulting from RNAi, triple null mutant parasites (Δmca2/3Δmca5) were generated and had similar growth in axenic culture and mice as in wild type parasites. Although questions remain regarding the precise role of these MCAs, it appears that they are not required for prostaglandin D2-induced cell death (16). However, the three MCAs were found to be associated with RAB11-positive endosomes, although they are not necessary for the known recycling processes performed by these endosomes (16). Deciphering the nature of this association could be pivotal to elucidating the main function(s) of these MCAs.
An intriguing aspect of the T. brucei MCA family is the presence of the two genes predicted to encode catalytically inactive proteins; MCA1 lacks both the histidine and cysteine of the expected active site dyad, whereas MCA4 has a serine in place of the usual catalytic cysteine (14, 15). Substitutions within the catalytic center of enzyme homologues are widespread across protozoan and metazoan proteomes, and some non-enzymatic homologues have been shown to play key regulatory roles (17). Indeed, regulation of some peptidases is known to occur through related inactive homologues. For example, the activity of caspase-8 in the mammalian extrinsic apoptotic pathway is regulated by direct interaction with cFLIPL (cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein long form), an inactive caspase-8 homologue (18). Also, growth factor signaling that is dependent on the intramembrane rhomboid peptidases is controlled by iRhoms (inactive rhomboid homologues) through substrate sequestration and subsequent removal via endoplasmic reticulum degradation (19). However, not all atypical active site configurations preclude peptidase activity, with mixed catalytic type peptidases also capable of proteolysis. The poliovirus type picornain C3 peptidases are instrumental in processing expressed viral proteins with proteolytic activity derived from a cysteine nucleophile operating within a classical serine peptidase fold (20). To date, no proteins have been identified with proteolytic activity derived from a serine nucleophile in a caspase fold.
Thus, several possible roles for MCA4 could be envisaged, and we undertook a detailed characterization of the enzyme with the aim of elucidating the part it plays as a member of the T. brucei MCA family. We found that despite the potentially catalytic serine residue in the MCA4 active site, the recombinant enzyme lacked peptidase activity toward a combinatorial peptide library and the specific activity toward Arg/Lys residues characteristic of metacaspases and thus is a pseudopeptidase. In addition, reverse genetics revealed MCA4 to have roles in both cell cycle progression and parasite virulence during mammalian infection. Moreover, we show that the membrane-associated MCA4 is specifically processed during its release by the palmitoylated and therefore membrane-bound MCA3 and thus that they appear to comprise a MCA proteolytic cascade.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Plasmids
Unless otherwise stated, all PCRs used T. brucei (strain 427) genomic DNA as an amplification template, and all oligonucleotide sequences are listed in supplemental Table S1. For MCA4 protein expression, the coding sequence was amplified using OL2329 and OL2330 and cloned into the pET-28a(+) (Novagen) using NdeI and XhoI restriction sites, creating pGL1697. MCA4S219C protein expression plasmid was produced by site-directed mutagenesis of MCA4 in pGL1697 using OL2605 and OL2606. For the MCA4 RNAi plasmid, a unique 469-bp fragment was identified by TrypanoFAN:RNAit (available on the World Wide Web), amplified using OL2312 and OL2313, and cloned into HindIII and BamHI sites in p2T7ti (21), creating pGL1695. For transfection into T. brucei, pGL1695 was digested with NotI. For deletion of the MCA4 locus, the 5′- and 3′-flanks of the MCA4 ORF were amplified by PCR using the primer pair OL3245 (NotI) and OL3246 (XbaI) and the primer pair OL3247 (ApaI) and OL3248 (ApaI and XhoI), respectively. Using NotI/XbaI and ApaI/XhoI, the 5′- and 3′-flanks were sequentially ligated into pGL1689, creating the NEO MCA4 knock-out construct named pGL1986. Exchange of resistance genes was achieved by excising a HYG gene from pGL1688 using BmgBI and BglII and cloning into pGL1986 predigested with BmgBI and BglII, generating pGL1985, the HYG MCA4 knock-out construct. For transfection into T. brucei, pGL1986 and pGL1985 were digested with NotI and XhoI.
The ectopic re-expression of MCA4 was achieved by modification of p2628 (22). First, the following primer pairs were used for site-directed mutagenesis to introduced NdeI (OL3047, OL3048) and BclI (OL3046, OL3055) restriction sites flanking the HYG gene, thereby allowing replacement with a BSD gene, cloned from pGL1466 using OL3049 and OL3050. The resulting construct was digested with XhoI and BamHI (removing the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) coding sequence), and the MCA4 gene amplified using OL3403 and OL3404 was cloned in producing pGL2067. For the ectopic expression of MCA4-YFP, the same BSD re-expression construct was digested with HindIII and BamHI, allowing insertion of MCA4 cloned without the stop codon using OL3397 and OL3398 to create pGL2132. For re-expression of mutant forms of MCA4, pGL2067 was subjected to site-directed mutagenesis. To investigate MCA4 membrane association, a cytosolic MCA4 mutant was generated by removing the predicted N-myristoylation site, using OL3768 and OL3769, creating MCA4G2A. The active site mutant MCA4S219C was produced using OL2605 and OL2606. All site-directed mutagenesis alterations were made using the QuikChange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's instructions and confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Parasites
T. brucei Lister 427 was grown in culture as a bloodstream form to a maximum cell density of 1 × 106 ml−1 at 37 °C in 5% carbon dioxide in HMI-9 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 10% serum plus, and 0.5 μg/ml penicillin-streptomycin solution (Sigma). The procyclic form was grown to a maximum cell density of 1 × 107 ml−1 at 27 °C in 5% carbon dioxide in SDM-79 medium supplemented with 10% FCS and 0.5 μg/ml penicillin-streptomycin solution (Sigma). The genetic knock-out of MCA4 was performed in bloodstream form T. brucei 427. The triple MCA null mutant cell line (Δmca2/3Δmca5) was generated and characterized previously (16). For animal infection assays, 1 × 105 cultured parasites were inoculated into ICR mice by intraperitoneal injection, and the parasitemia was monitored daily by hemocytometer cell count of mouse blood taken from a tail vein diluted in 0.83% ammonium chloride. For infection experiments, groups of four mice were infected with trypanosomes taken directly from the same donor mouse.
T. brucei Transfection
1 × 107 mid-log cells were harvested by centrifugation at 1500 × g for 10 min at 37 °C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of Human T Cell Nucleofector Solution (Lonza), transferred to an electroporation cuvette, mixed with 10 μg of linearized DNA, and pulsed once on program X-001 using the Human T Cell Nucleofector machine (Amaxa). After overnight recovery, selection of clones was achieved by limiting dilution with appropriate antibiotics 5 μg/ml hygromycin B (Calbiochem), 2.5 μg/ml G418 (Calbiochem), 2.5 μg/ml phleomycin (InvivoGen), and 10 μg/ml blasticidin (Calbiochem). RNAi analysis and the tetracycline-induced expression of tagged transgenes were performed in bloodstream form 427 13-90 and procyclic form 427 29-13 cell lines (23). To induce RNAi or transgene expression, 1 μg/ml tetracycline was added to the culture medium, with cells reseeded at 1 × 105 ml−1 every 24 h.
Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorting (FACS)
To analyze the DNA content of T. brucei, cells were fixed overnight in 70% methanol, 30% PBS; washed in 10 ml of PBS; resuspended in 1 ml of PBS supplemented with 10 μg/ml propidium iodide (Sigma), 10 μg/ml RNase A (Sigma); and incubated at 37 °C for 45 min in the dark. FACS analysis was performed on a BD Biosciences FACSCalibur. For each sample, 10,000 events (cells) were analyzed. Data interpretation was performed using the CellQuestPro software (BD Biosciences).
Recombinant Protein; Expression and Purification
The MCA4 protein expression vector (pGL1697) was transformed into BL21 Rosetta Escherichia coli (Stratagene), and bacteria were grown in Overnight Express TB medium (Novagen) for 16 h and lysed in bacterial protein extraction reagent (Pierce) supplemented with 10 μg/ml DNase I (Sigma). HIS-MCA4 was purified by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography on a column packed with Metal Chelate-20 (Poros). MCA4 was eluted in 1-ml fractions using 50 mm NaH2PO4, 300 mm NaCl, 0.5 m imidazole, pH 8.0, and then buffer-exchanged into 50 mm Tris, pH 8, using a PD10 column (GE Healthcare), and 150 mm NaCl was subsequently added.
Antibody Production
Purified recombinant MCA4 was used as an antigen to raise a polyclonal antibody. Two chickens were immunized with recombinant MCA4 (four 250-μl inoculations of 1 μg/ml protein over 4 months) at the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service (Penicuik, UK). Total IgY was purified from egg yolks using the Eggcellent IgY Purification kit (Pierce) and then affinity-purified against recombinant MCA4 immobilized on AminoLink coupling gel (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Immunoblotting
Whole cell extracts and purified proteins were mixed with LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen), denatured by heating at 100 °C for 4 min, and then electrophoresed on 12% (w/v) SDS-PAGE. Gels were either stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (2.5% (w/v)), 45% (v/v) methanol, 10% acetic acid or transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond-C, Amersham Biosciences) for Western blotting. Primary antibodies against MCA4, EF-1α (Millipore), and BiP (endoplasmic reticulum hsp70, binding protein) (gift from J.D. Bangs (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI)) were used at 1:800, 1:2000, and 1:15000, respectively. HRP-conjugated anti-chicken (Invitrogen) was used at 1:4000, and anti-mouse (Promega), anti-rabbit (Promega), and anti-sheep (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) were used at 1:5000. The cellular fractionation was verified using antibodies specific to the cytoskeletal protein β-tubulin (24) (KMX-1 monoclonal, Millipore) diluted 1:10,000 and the cytoplasmic protein oligopeptidase B diluted 1:1000 (25–27). Chemiluminescence detection was with the SuperSignal system or Novex ECL (Invitrogen).
Enzyme Assays
For autocatalytic processing, 10 μg of purified recombinant MCA4 or MCA4S219C was incubated in a reaction buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8, 150 mm NaCl, 5 mm DTT) with and without 10 mm CaCl2 for 1 h at 37 °C. For MCA3 autocatalytic processing, 5 μg of recombinant enzyme was incubated in the described buffer supplemented with 1 mm CaCl2. The extent of autocatalytic processing was monitored by SDS-PAGE. For MCA2 processing of MCA4, 10 μg of purified MCA4 was incubated with increasing amounts of purified recombinant MCA2 (0, 1, 10, and 100 ng) in reaction buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8, 150 mm NaCl, 5 mm DTT, 10 mm CaCl2) for 1 h at 37 °C. The extent of processing was monitored by SDS-PAGE.
Fluorogenic Enzyme Assays
Proteolytic activity of purified recombinant protein was assessed by measuring the hydrolysis of synthetic fluorogenic substrates. All assays were run in clear bottom 96-well plates and typically contained the following components: 2 μg of purified enzyme, reaction buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8, 150 mm NaCl, 5 mm DTT, and 10 mm CaCl2), 10 μm substrate (e.g. benzyloxycarbonyl (Z)-RR-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC)) and distilled water to 200 μl. All assays were run in triplicate and included “no-enzyme” controls. Fluorescence was read in an EnVision Multilabel Reader (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) at an excitation wavelength (λEx) of 355 nm and emission wavelength (λEm) of 460 nm using the general mirror. Specific activities were calculated using an AMC standard. A positional scanning combinatorial library was used to confirm the lack of MCA4 activity, Abz-GXXZXXQ-EDDnp (where Abz is ortho-aminobenzoic acid, Q-EDDnp is glutamine (ethylenediamine(2,4-dinitrophenyl)), the Z position was filled with 1 of 19 amino acids (cysteine was omitted), and X represents randomly incorporated amino acids.
Acyl-Biotin Exchange
To detect MCA4 palmitoylation, an acyl-biotin exchange assay was used as described previously by Emmer et al. (28).
N-terminal Edman Degradation
To sequence the N terminus of processing products, reactions were set up as described above, electrophoresed on NuPAGE Novex 10% BisTris gels (Invitrogen), and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Hybond-P, Amersham Biosciences). Edman sequencing was performed by the University of Dundee Medical Research Council Protein Phosphorylation Unit.
Microscopy
Images were obtained using an Applied Precision DeltaVision Deconvolution microscope system fitted with a CoolSnap HQ camera. Image capture and microscope operation were performed using the software package SoftWoRx. Fluorescence was viewed using the FITC filter (λEx 490 nm/λEm 528 nm), and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) filter (λEx 360 nm/λEm 457 nm), and reference images were obtained using the differential interference contrast filter. Exposure time was set to 1 s with the transmission level of the neutral filter optimized for each sample, and ×60 or ×100 oil immersion objectives were used. Typically, 15 Z-stacks were obtained and individually deconvolved using the automatic conservative ratio setting before projection into one representative image. To merge images containing multiple fluorescent signals, Adobe Photoshop was used. For direct cell fluorescence, ∼1 × 105 T. brucei were washed twice in trypanosome dilution buffer (TDB) (20 mm Na2HPO4, 2 mm NaH2PO4, 80 mm NaCl, 5 mm KCl, 1 mm MgSO4, 20 mm glucose, pH 7.4) before fixation in 1% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (Sigma) with concurrent incubation on ice for 15 min. After two further washes in TDB, the cell pellet was resuspended in 20 μl of TDB and evenly spread onto twin frosted end 76 × 26-mm microscope slides coated in 0.1% poly-l-lysine (Sigma), and the cells were allowed to sediment. Excess liquid was removed, and the cells on each slide were stained with 10 μl of 1 μg/ml DAPI in mounting solution (PBS, 50% (v/v) glycerol, 2.5% (w/v) DABCO). All slides were fitted with a coverslip sealed with nail varnish.
Immunofluorescence Analysis
The protocol used for immunofluorescence analysis was adapted from the method published by Field et al. (29). Briefly, mid-log bloodstream form parasites were washed in vPBS (137 mm NaCl, 3 mm KCl, 16 mm Na2HPO4, 3 mm KH2PO4, 46 mm sucrose, 10 mm glucose, pH 7.6) before fixation on ice in 3% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. The fix solution was diluted out with excess vPBS, and two further cell washes were performed. Fixed cells were applied to a 2-cm2 area outlined in nail varnish on 0.1% poly-l-lysine-treated microscope slides and allowed to sediment. When required, the cells were permeabilized by applying 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min before washing with PBS and blocking for 1 h using 20% (v/v) fetal calf serum (Sigma) in PBS. Anti-MCA4 (1:400) diluted in blocking solution was applied and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Slides were washed three times with PBS before one incubation with Alexa Fluor 488 (green)-conjugated anti-chicken (Molecular Probes) diluted 1:7500 in blocking solution. Slides were washed three times with PBS, stained with 1 μg/ml DAPI in mounting solution, and sealed with a coverslip and nail varnish.
Immunoelectron Microscopy
A bloodstream form T. brucei cell pellet was chemically fixed in suspension and maintained in 0.2% (v/v) gluteraldehyde, 2% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.2) on ice for 1 h. After fixation, the cells were rinsed in PBS and embedded in Lowicryl resin using the progressive lowering of the temperature method. Cells were cut into blocks and mounted on metal pins and frozen in liquid nitrogen before sectioning with a Leica Ultracut UCT/FCS. The cryosections were blocked with 0.1 m glycine followed by 5% (w/v) BSA and then labeled with affinity-purified anti-MCA4 (1:10) and 1.4-nm gold (rabbit) anti-chicken (1:20) (Aurion). Cells were contrast-stained, and the immunolabeling was enhanced by 15-min treatment with R-gent (Aurion). Sections were viewed with a LEO 912 transmission electron microscope.
Cell Fractionation
The cellular fractionation method was adapted from Ref. 30. For detergent lysis, 2 × 107 mid-log cells were washed in vPBS and lysed in 500 μl of 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 25 mm HEPES, 1 mm EDTA, pH 7.4, for 30 min on ice before centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 5 min. For hypotonic lysis, 2 × 107 mid-log BSF cells were washed in vPBS and lysed in 500 μl of 10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, with four 15-s blasts in an ice-cold sonicating water bath (Fisher FB15047), before centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 5 min. For both lysis methods, insoluble material in the pellet was solubilized by boiling with 625 μl of 1× SDS-PAGE sample buffer for 5 min. The supernatant was prepared for electrophoresis by adding 125 μl of 4× SDS-PAGE sample buffer and boiling for 5 min. 1 × 106 cell equivalents were loaded per lane.
Motility Analysis
T. brucei resistance to sedimentation was investigated as a function of cell motility (31). Wild type BSF T. brucei and Δmca4 cells were cultured to the same mid-log densities. 2 ml of culture was divided equally into two cuvettes, and the A600 was recorded at the 0, 3, and 6 h time points. One cuvette remained undisturbed, and the other was mixed and resuspended before each optical density reading. Three replicate experiments were performed, and sedimentation rates were determined by subtracting the A600 of the undisturbed control from the A600 of the resuspended culture.
MCA4 Release
To detect release of MCA4, 1 × 108 mid-log T. brucei cells were washed in TDB and incubated at 37 °C in 15 ml of 50% serum-free HMI9, 50% TDB. Cell viability was monitored every hour by hemocytometer count, and after 3.5 h, cells were removed by centrifugation at 1500 × g for 15 min. Trypanosome-free medium was carefully aspirated, and Complete Protease Inhibitor Mixture (Roche Applied Science) was added to a final concentration of 1.5×, before slow passage through a 0.2-μm syringe filter and 75-fold concentration using a VivaSpin 20 10,000 molecular weight cut-off filter unit. The concentrated supernatant was prepared for SDS-PAGE, and 35 μl was loaded alongside whole cell lysate from 1 × 105 cells, electrophoresed on a 12% SDS-PAGE, and then transferred to nitrocellulose for Western blotting.
Statistical Analysis of Data
Where indicated, data were expressed as means ± S.D. p values were calculated using an unpaired, two-tailed Student's t test on Microsoft Excel. Differences were considered significant at a p value of <0.001.
RESULTS
MCA4 Is a Pseudopeptidase
The predicted active site of MCA4 maintains the canonical histidine residue but has serine instead of the usual cysteine nucleophil (14, 15). Given the highly specific nature of enzyme active sites, it seemed likely that this substitution would make the peptidase inactive. However, other possibilities existed. First, it is possible that MCA4 functions as a mixed type peptidase utilizing the reactive hydroxyl group of the serine as a nucleophile. Second, two cysteine residues widely conserved among MCAs but located outside of the predicted active site may serve as alternative catalytic residues; MCA4 Cys-98 is found in all MCAs, and MCA4 Cys-218 is present in all kinetoplast MCAs (14, 32). Thus, we first sought to establish whether or not MCA4 is an active peptidase through analysis of the recombinant protein.
Previous work demonstrated that TbMCA2 undergoes rapid calcium-dependent autocatalytic processing but that this is not required for activity (2). MCA4 remained unprocessed in the presence of calcium (Fig. 1A), and a range of peptide substrates cleaved by MCA2, including Z-GGR-AMC, Z-GRR-AMC, Z-RR-AMC, and a peptide library containing all amino acids in the P1 position, also failed to detect MCA4 activity. An MCA4S219C mutant, in which the active site serine was replaced with cysteine, was, however, capable of autoprocessing when incubated with calcium (Fig. 1B). N-terminal Edman sequencing of the major proteolytic processing product identified autocatalytic cleavage at Lys-64 (KESK64GFQPWK). Consistent with metacaspase specificity toward basic residues in the P1 position, we found that MCA4S219C could also cleave the peptide substrate Z-GGR-AMC, although at a rate greatly reduced in comparison with MCA2 (MCA2, 11 ± 3.0 milliunits/mg protein; MCA4S219C, 0.031 ± 0.0043 milliunits/mg protein). MCA4S219C activity was similar to that of MCA2 in being dependent on calcium and strongly inhibited by leupeptin and antipain but only mildly inhibited by E64 (Fig. 1C). These data collectively demonstrate that creation of the canonical metacaspase dyad in MCA4 produces a calcium-dependent proteolytically active enzyme, confirming that MCA4 has retained the structure of active MCAs; the lack of peptidase activity, however, means that it is a pseudopeptidase.
FIGURE 1.
MCA4 and MCA4S219C peptidase activity. A, lack of calcium-dependent MCA4 autoprocessing (10 μg) was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. B, calcium-dependent MCA4S219C (10 μg) autoprocessing was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The N terminus of the major processed product was sequenced (underlined), and the processing site is marked with an asterisk. C, cleavage of Z-GGR-AMC by 5 μg of MCA4S219C was measured under the conditions indicated, expressed as relative value, and given as mean ± S.D. (error bars).
RNAi Depletion of MCA4 Severely Restricts Parasite Proliferation
Western blot analysis revealed that MCA4 expression has a distinct stage specificity, with the protein being present in the bloodstream form but not detectable in the procyclic form of the parasite (Fig. 2A). The antibody specificity was confirmed by analysis of an MCA2, MCA3, MCA5 triple null mutant (16), in which the immunopositive band was similar in intensity to that in wild type parasites (Fig. 2A). The size of the MCA4 protein in the parasite extracts was very close to the predicted 40-kDa molecular mass of the full-length protein, showing that under standard in vitro growth conditions, MCA4 in the parasite was not subject to detectable proteolytic processing events.
FIGURE 2.
MCA4 expression and analysis by RNAi. A, total cell lysates were prepared from T. brucei bloodstream form (lane 1) and procyclic form (lane 2) and bloodstream form Δmca2/3Δmca5 (lane 3) and separated by SDS-PAGE before Western blotting with anti-MCA4. An antibody specific to EF-1α demonstrates equal loading. B, MCA4 RNAi in bloodstream form was induced by 1 μg/ml tetracycline (Tet+), and parasite growth rate was compared with non-induced control (Tet−). C, Western blot analysis of MCA4 protein level during RNAi time course. D, the effect of MCA4 RNAi on cell cycle progression was determined by assessing DNA configuration using DAPI staining and fluorescence microscopy. >200 cells were counted per time point. Cells at the start of the cycle with a single nucleus (N) and kinetoplast (K) are 1N1K. Kinetoplast division occurs ahead of nuclear division, leading to 1N2K cells before post-mitotic 2N2K cells. Those cells with abnormal DNA content are classified as “other.”
This defined pattern of expression suggested an important role specific to bloodstream forms, so in order to investigate this, we characterized the effects of targeted RNAi down-regulation of MCA4 in this life cycle stage. Following RNAi induction, a rapid growth arrest occurred at around 8 h with only low numbers of motile cells persisting over the remainder of the RNAi time course (Fig. 2B). Western blot analysis was used to verify the successful depletion of MCA4 (Fig. 2C). To analyze the progression of RNAi-induced parasites through the cell cycle, the configuration of nuclei (N) and kinetoplasts (K) was determined by fluorescent microscopy of DAPI-stained cells (Fig. 2D). The reduction of cells with one nucleus and one kinetoplast (1N1K cells) with increased 2N2K and abnormal cells (classified as “others,” including those containing increased DNA content and zoids) showed that induced cells were able to replicate their DNA but failed to correctly execute cytokinesis. The flow cytometry profiles of the induced cells confirmed the DAPI analysis (supplemental Fig. S1). These RNAi data suggest that MCA4 is essential for the normal proliferation of bloodstream form T. brucei. This finding corroborates and expands upon a similar observation following a genome-wide RNAi silencing screen, which identified MCA4 as having a loss of fitness phenotype (33).
An Important Role for MCA4 in Virulence
Previous work demonstrated that simultaneous RNAi silencing of MCA2, MCA3, and MCA5 was lethal to bloodstream form T. brucei, yet the generation of triple null mutant cell lines was still possible (16). We found that this was also the case with MCA4 because MCA4 null mutants (Δmca4) were readily generated. MCA4 and a number of mutant MCA4 re-expression lines were created through the introduction of specific amino acid changes within MCA4 (designated Δmca4:MCA4, Δmca4:MCA4G2A, and Δmca4:MCA4S219C). The validity of the genetic manipulation was confirmed by Southern blotting (supplemental Fig. S2), and Western blotting was used to verify the absence of MCA4 in Δmca4 cells and to demonstrate that re-expression occurred at a level equivalent to that in the wild type cells (Fig. 3A).
FIGURE 3.
Analysis of bloodstream form MCA4 null mutants. A, Western blot of Δmca4 and re-expression cell lines. Lane 1, T. brucei 427; lane 2, Δmca4; lane 3, Δmca4:MCA4; lane 4, Δmca4:MCA4G2A; lane 5, Δmca4:MCA4S219C. B, groups of four mice were infected with 3 × 105 parasites, and mouse survival was monitored daily and is shown by a Kaplan-Meier survival curve. C, mice were infected with 3 × 105 parasites, and parasitemia was monitored by tail prick and hemocytometer cell count. Mice were culled when parasitemia reached >1 × 108 cells/ml or upon presentation of severe symptoms.
The initial growth rate of Δmca4 parasites in culture was greatly reduced in comparison with the parental wild type strain (supplemental Fig. S3). However, following several weeks of continuous growth and subculturing, the growth rate of Δmca4 recovered and DAPI analysis revealed that, unlike the RNAi-induced cells, no major defects were detected in cell cycle progression or motility (supplemental Fig. S3).
A potential role of MCA4 in the mammalian infection process was investigated by comparing the infection profiles of wild type and mutant parasites in mice. The wild type parasites were highly virulent in mice and, by day 4, established parasitemia above 108 cells ml−1, which was when the mice were culled (Fig. 3, B and C). Δmca4 parasites, however, showed a drastically different infection profile, with mouse survival prolonged to around 15 days (Fig. 3B). The reduced in vivo growth rate of MCA4-deficient parasites could be partially restored by the re-expression of MCA4, with 75% of mice succumbing to Δmca4:MCA4 infection by day 7. Axenic culture of parasites isolated from mice at the first peak of parasitemia revealed normal growth for all strains (supplemental Fig. S3), indicating that the variation observed in vivo was due to interaction with the host.
Detailed analysis of the parasitemia patterns of the infected mice revealed several interesting trends. The wild type parasites were extremely virulent, and the parasitemia increased very rapidly (Fig. 3C). In contrast, mice infected with Δmca4 had a peak of parasitemia separated by a trough period where parasitemia was below the detection threshold. In the re-expression cell lines, the parasitemia profile was more similar to that of the wild type cells, typified by consistent growth with only one mouse per group being able to very briefly clear infection to below the detection threshold (Fig. 3C).
MCA4 Associates with the Flagellar Membrane
The cellular localization of MCA4 was revealed by immunofluorescence microscopy using affinity-purified, anti-MCA4 antibody (Fig. 4A). MCA4 was found to localize predominantly to the flagellum, appearing as a combination of punctate structures and larger confluent foci distributed along the entire length of the flagellum. This was confirmed by re-expression of MCA4 with a C-terminal YFP fusion in Δmca4 parasites, which also revealed a distinct flagellum localization when viewed by direct fluorescent microscopy. Immunogold transmission electron microscopy studies provided further detailed evidence supporting the punctate nature of MCA4 along the flagellum, with the enhanced immunogold particles appearing in clusters at unmarked but distinct foci along the internal surface of the flagellum (Fig. 4B).
FIGURE 4.
Localization of MCA4 in bloodstream form trypanosomes. A, immunofluorescence. Cells were permeabilized with Triton X-100 or left intact, before incubation with anti-MCA4 antibody and anti-chicken Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate, visualized using the FITC filter set (green). DNA was stained with DAPI (blue), and reference images were taken with differential interference contrast filter settings. Δmca4:YFP-MCA4 cells were analyzed by direct fluorescence using the FITC filter set (green). Scale bars, 5 μm. B, MCA4 immunogold transmission electron microscopy. Fixed cells were cryosectioned and labeled with anti-MCA4 and 1.4-nm gold-conjugated rabbit anti-chicken. Black arrowheads, enhanced immunogold particles. Lower left image, digitally magnified section of the corresponding image above; arrowheads labeled a and b are labeled a′ and b′ in the magnified section.
The T. brucei flagellum is a complex organelle composed of multiple distinct structures. To gain potential insights into MCA4 function, the precise location within the flagellum was assessed using a subcellular fractionation procedure capable of distinguishing between soluble, cytoskeletal, and membrane-associated proteins. Western blot analysis of T. brucei subcellular fractions demonstrated that MCA4 was a membrane-associated protein, being found in the pellet of the hypotonic and sonicated cell lysate and the soluble fraction of the detergent-treated cell lysate (Fig. 5A). To verify the quality of the fractionation procedure, the different fractions were probed with antibodies specific to the cytoskeletal protein β-tubulin and the cytoplasmic protein oligopeptidase B. To determine whether MCA4 was located on the internal or external surface of the flagellar membrane, immunofluorescence microscopy was performed in the presence and absence of Triton X-100 (Fig. 4A). The stronger staining of the flagellum was detected in those cells treated with detergent, suggesting that the MCA4 epitopes were mainly internally located and required permeabilization for exposure.
FIGURE 5.
Subcellular fractionation and modification of MCA4 in bloodstream form trypanosomes. A, cell fractionation. Total cell lysate (T), detergent-soluble (DS), detergent pellet (DP), hypotonic soluble (HS), and hypotonic pellet (HP) fractions were analyzed by Western blot using anti-MCA4 antibody. The quality of fractionation was validated with antibodies specific to β-tubulin and oligopeptidase B (OPB). B, acyl-biotin exchange reaction. Palmitoylated proteins were specifically labeled by cleaving palmitate-thioester bonds with hydroxylamine and subsequently reacted with biotin-HPDP (N-[6-(biotinamido)hexyl]-3′-(2′-pyridyldithio)propionamide), allowing purification with streptavidin-agarose. Original cell lysate (I), the wash fraction (W), and eluted material (E) from hydroxylamine-treated and Tris control samples were immunoblotted with anti-MCA4 antibody.
No single flagellum-targeting sequence has been identified for T. brucei; however, dual acylation has been shown to influence the flagellar membrane association of several proteins (28, 34, 35). Previous comprehensive bioinformatic screens identified MCA4 Gly-2 as a target for N-myristoylation (36), a modification often associated with palmitoylation. Accordingly, we attempted to provide experimental evidence of in vivo MCA4 palmitoylation using an acyl-biotin exchange reaction (28). Western blotting of material from the experimental and control reactions revealed that MCA4 was purified in a hydroxylamine-dependent manner from T. brucei cell lysate, confirming that the protein was palmitoylated in vivo (Fig. 5B). This experimental finding combined with the bioinformatic predictions suggests that MCA4 is dually acylated.
The influence of acylation on MCA4 localization was investigated by creation of a MCA4G2A mutation that was predicted to prevent N-myristoylation and consequently palmitoylation. MCA4G2A was re-expressed in Δmca4 parasites, and fractionation of the Δmca4:MCA4G2A parasites revealed that MCA4G2A appeared in the soluble material following hypotonic lysis (Fig. 5A). Immunofluorescent analysis of the Δmca4:MCA4G2A mutants showed that MCA4G2A was dispersed throughout the cytoplasm and absent from the flagellum (Fig. 4A). Infection of mice with Δmca4:MCA4G2A parasites demonstrated complementation of the Δmca4 phenotype, indicating that under the condition tested, flagellar membrane localization of MCA4 is not essential for an effect on the parasite's virulence (Fig. 3, B and C).
Processing of MCA4 and Release
Previous work identified MCA4 as part of the secretome of two independent T. brucei gambiense strains (37). We therefore tried to provide independent verification of a similar occurrence in T. brucei. Cultured mid-log phase bloodstream form parasites were incubated in serum-free medium for 3.5 h before removal by centrifugation. The resulting parasite-free medium was concentrated and analyzed alongside whole cell lysate by Western blot. MCA4 was clearly evident in the released material, appearing as different sized proteins: a higher molecular mass species (identical in size to the protein detected in cell lysate) and two smaller less abundant processed forms (Fig. 6A). Nonspecific protein accumulation in the medium was analyzed by probing the blot with anti-BiP, which is largely retained intracellularly (38). In comparison with the parasite lysate, only small amounts of BiP were detected in the released material (Fig. 6A). MCA4 release was detected in both Δmca4:MCA4 and Δmca4:MCA4G2A cell lines, revealing that MCA4 release occurred independently of flagellar membrane localization (Fig. 6A). One key finding, however, was the absence of any processed MCA4 protein in the material released from Δmca4:MCA4G2A cells. This excluded the possibility of random degradation of MCA4 occurring in the medium and suggested a specific proteolytic event dependent upon association of MCA4 with the flagellar membrane.
FIGURE 6.
MCA4 release and proteolytic processing by MCA3. A, detection of MCA4 in released material. Cells were incubated in serum-free medium and then removed by centrifugation before concentration of cell free fraction and analysis by Western blot. Total cell lysate (T) and released material (R) were probed with anti-MCA4. The blot was stripped and reprobed with anti-BiP. B, MCA4 processing by MCA2 was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The N terminus of the major processed product was sequenced, six amino acids were identified (underlined), and the cleavage site was marked with an asterisk. RB, reaction buffer.
To test if one of the other TbMCAs might be responsible for MCA4 processing, we analyzed material released from Δmca2/3 Δmca5 parasites (16) and found that only full-length MCA4 could be detected. We analyzed individual re-expressor cell lines and identified MCA3 as the major peptidase responsible for MCA4 processing (Fig. 6A). MCA2 and MCA3 proteins share 89% sequence identity with nearly identical catalytic domains and divergence only found at the N terminus (15, 16), a difference that does not appear to alter the enzyme's substrate specificity (supplemental Fig. S4). Thus, it was intriguing that in vivo processing of MCA4 was mediated only by MCA3. To rule out the possibility that MCA4 is resistant to MCA2 proteolytic activity, we incubated recombinant MCA4 with MCA2 (2:1 molar ratio) and, having confirmed that it had no significant impact on MCA2 activity, showed that recombinant MCA2 processed MCA4 with a pattern of cleavage similar to that of the autocatalytic processing by MCA4S219C (compare Figs. 6B and 1B). N-terminal Edman degradation revealed that processing occurred at Lys-64, the same residue cleaved during autocatalytic processing of recombinant MCA4S219C (Figs. 1B and 6B). These data suggest that the selective in vivo proteolytic cleavage of MCA4 by MCA3 must be due to reasons other than specificity per se and provide direct evidence that there is co-localization of and interaction between these T. brucei MCAs in a proteolytic cascade, resulting in release of the pseudopeptidase.
DISCUSSION
The active site residues of metacaspases have been identified through sequence alignment and homology with caspases, followed in some cases by experimental verification (2, 4). The predicted active site of MCA4 is of particular interest due to the presence of a potential serine nucleophile within a cysteine peptidase. Here we demonstrate, however, that MCA4 does not have autocatalytic activity or activity toward a range of peptide substrates, ruling out the possibility that it functions as a mixed type peptidase or that catalytic activity can be derived from other conserved cysteine residues. Nevertheless, by using mutagenesis to reinstate a canonical metacaspase active site, we have shown that MCA4S219C has calcium-dependent MCA-like activity, and consequently the native protein has retained a functional peptidase tertiary structure. In light of these findings, we speculate that the active site cysteine was mutated in an ancestral MCA, generating the pseudopeptidase MCA4, which now fulfills an important role for the parasite.
Targeted RNAi down-regulation indicated that MCA4 is essential for bloodstream form cell proliferation. At 24 h post-induction, abnormal cell types accumulated, which is indicative of a post-mitotic block and links MCA4 to a role in cytokinesis. However, the MCA4 RNAi mutants broadly conform to a common phenotype associated with the RNAi down-regulation of key bloodstream form flagellar proteins (39). Therefore, given the flagellar membrane association that we have demonstrated for MCA4, we predict that MCA4 is more likely to exert its effect on cytokinesis indirectly.
The implied essentiality of MCA4 following RNAi down-regulation strongly suggested that the gene would be refractory to genetic deletion. However, MCA4 was successfully deleted from bloodstream form cells creating viable null mutant parasites (Δmca4). We attribute this apparent discrepancy to the differing dynamics of MCA4 depletion associated with each technique. RNAi of MCA4 leads to rapid removal of the protein, preventing parasite adaptation, whereas the sequential replacement of each allele during creation of the null mutants provides sufficient time for parasite adjustment to diminishing MCA4 levels. This adaptation in null mutants has also been described for Δmca2/3Δmca5 parasites (16). In that instance, it was suggested that MCA4 may be an alternative compensatory biochemical pathway following the deletion of MCA2, MCA3, and MCA5. However, given the absence of MCA4 activity and the markedly different localization, this now appears unlikely.
The ancestral MCA homologue in T. brucei is likely to be MCA5, given its synteny with the single L. major MCA. This raises the question of whether MCA function differs between organisms with a single metacaspase (such as budding yeast and L. major) and organisms with multiple MCAs (T. brucei and A. thaliana). MCA2, MCA3, and MCA4 are all expressed at a higher level in the bloodstream form of the parasite than in the procyclic form, whereas MCA5 is expressed equally in both life cycle stages (16) (this work). Accordingly, we speculated that MCA4 could be involved in trypanosome-specific functions associated with mammalian infectivity. Indeed, infection of mice with wild type T. brucei and Δmca4 cell lines revealed strikingly different patterns of infection, with Δmca4 cells showing periods below the detection threshold and consecutive days of reduced parasite burdens more similar to pleomorphic bloodstream form strains than to the parental highly virulent monomorphic 427 strain. This resulted in a markedly extended survival time for the host mice and revealed a role for MCA4 in parasite virulence within the mammalian host.
Our data, together with a recent characterization of the flagellum proteome (40), have identified a flagellum localization for MCA4. Several other flagellar proteins have also been shown to influence T. brucei virulence in mice. The deletion of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C created a prolonged infection in mice that was accompanied by multiple peaks and troughs of parasitemia (41). In addition, in vivo RNAi silencing of the calflagins (Tb17, Tb24, and Tb44) prolonged mouse survival by attenuating parasite growth, creating an infection with waves of parasitemia associated with the expression of alternative variant surface glycoproteins (42). Although not confirmed experimentally, it seems likely that the reduced virulence of Δmca4 allowed the host's immune system sufficient time to clear the original infection before the re-emergence of cells expressing a different VSG type.
Regulated proteolytic activity is an important mechanism of signal transduction used by peptidases to modify properties of substrate proteins. The strict specificity displayed by many Clan CD peptidases is dictated by a highly selective S1 pocket, which ensures that they are well adapted to carry out specific processing events and less suited to perform random proteolytic degradation. This is well demonstrated by the many complex and intricate signaling pathways involving caspases during their participation in apoptosis and inflammation (43). Indeed, related processes have recently been reported for an MCA from P. abies (mcII-Pa) that was shown to inactivate a Tudor staphylococcal nuclease protein through cleavage at four defined sites during programmed cell death events associated with embryogenesis and oxidative stress (6). However, whether this represents a highly specific form of signal transduction, as witnessed for capsases, is open to some debate (8). Our observation that MCA3 processes MCA4 provides the first identification of an in vivo T. brucei MCA substrate, which is only the second MCA substrate to be identified, after Tudor staphylococcal nuclease (6). Although the biological significance of MCA4 processing is unknown, this cleavage event establishes an important link between two MCAs that may be a component of a broader MCA cascade. Moreover, the proteolytic inactivity of MCA4 suggests that it lies at the end of any such proteolytic cascade. This arrangement, whereby MCA4 is placed under the control of MCA3, may optimize release and action of MCA4 in a highly regulated manner.
The major form of MCA4 detected after release from the parasite was similar in size to the full-length protein, but less abundant lower molecular mass forms were also detected. Because re-expression of MCA4G2A in Δmca4 resulted in the release of only the full-length protein, processing of MCA4 is clearly dependent upon correct membrane localization and was not the product of random degradation or autocatalytic activity. Our finding that MCA3 processes MCA4 is particularly relevant because MCA3 has been reported to be present in RAB11-positive endosomes/exosomes (16) and the flagellum proteome (40) and is the only other T. brucei MCA that is palmitoylated (35). These data suggest that there must be some crossover between the exosome membranes and the flagellum, at which point MCA4 is processed and released. We have also shown that lipidation is crucial in allowing direct interaction between MCA3 and MCA4 on the membrane. However, this interaction at the membrane is not essential for the release of MCA4 because the non-lipidated mutant is also released, possibly via an alternative route.
The way in which MCA4 exerts its influence upon infection in a mammalian host remains to be established, but the recent proposal that exosome release, by both intracellular and extracellular pathogens, can allow effector molecule delivery to host cell cytosol (44) provides a possible mechanism for delivery of trypanosome virulence factors (45). Our finding that MCA4 is released by bloodstream form T. brucei and does not appear to influence the processing or activity of other MCAs opens up the possibility that it could target and regulate host molecules. Future investigation of T. brucei strains that establish natural chronic infections could help to identify potential MCA4 interactions and allow further clarification of its role in parasite virulence.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
We thank Karen McLuskey for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by Medical Research Council Grants G9722968, G0000508, and G0700127.

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Table S1 and Figs. S1–S4.
- MCA
- metacaspase
- Z
- benzyloxycarbonyl
- AMC
- 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin
- TDB
- trypanosome dilution buffer
- BisTris
- 2-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol.
REFERENCES
- 1. Uren A. G., O'Rourke K., Aravind L. A., Pisabarro M. T., Seshagiri S., Koonin E. V., Dixit V. M. (2000) Mol. Cell 6, 961–967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Moss C. X., Westrop G. D., Juliano L., Coombs G. H., Mottram J. C. (2007) FEBS Lett. 581, 5635–5639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Watanabe N., Lam E. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 14691–14699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Vercammen D., van de Cotte B., De Jaeger G., Eeckhout D., Casteels P., Vandepoele K., Vandenberghe I., Van Beeumen J., Inzé D., Van Breusegem F. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 45329–45336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bozhkov P. V., Suarez M. F., Filonova L. H., Daniel G., Zamyatnin A. A., Jr., Rodriguez-Nieto S., Zhivotovsky B., Smertenko A. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 14463–14468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sundström J. F., Vaculova A., Smertenko A. P., Savenkov E. I., Golovko A., Minina E., Tiwari B. S., Rodriguez-Nieto S., Zamyatnin A. A., Jr., Välineva T., Saarikettu J., Frilander M. J., Suarez M. F., Zavialov A., Ståhl U., Hussey P. J., Silvennoinen O., Sundberg E., Zhivotovsky B., Bozhkov P. V. (2009) Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1347–1354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Madeo F., Herker E., Maldener C., Wissing S., Lächelt S., Herlan M., Fehr M., Lauber K., Sigrist S. J., Wesselborg S., Fröhlich K. U. (2002) Mol. Cell 9, 911–917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Tsiatsiani L., Van Breusegem F., Gallois P., Zavialov A., Lam E., Bozhkov P. V. (2011) Cell Death Differ. 18, 1279–1288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lee R. E., Puente L. G., Kaern M., Megeney L. A. (2008) PLoS One 3, e2956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lee R. E., Brunette S., Puente L. G., Megeney L. A. (2010) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 13348–13353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ambit A., Fasel N., Coombs G. H., Mottram J. C. (2008) Cell Death Differ. 15, 113–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zalila H., González I. J., El-Fadili A. K., Delgado M. B., Desponds C., Schaff C., Fasel N. (2011) Mol. Microbiol. 79, 222–239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Coll N. S., Vercammen D., Smidler A., Clover C., Van Breusegem F., Dangl J. L., Epple P. (2010) Science 330, 1393–1397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Szallies A., Kubata B. K., Duszenko M. (2002) FEBS Lett. 517, 144–150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mottram J. C., Helms M. J., Coombs G. H., Sajid M. (2003) Trends Parasitol. 19, 182–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Helms M. J., Ambit A., Appleton P., Tetley L., Coombs G. H., Mottram J. C. (2006) J. Cell Sci. 119, 1105–1117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pils B., Schultz J. (2004) J. Mol. Biol. 340, 399–404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yu J. W., Jeffrey P. D., Shi Y. (2009) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 8169–8174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zettl M., Adrain C., Strisovsky K., Lastun V., Freeman M. (2011) Cell 145, 79–91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sárkány Z., Polgár L. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 516–522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. LaCount D. J., Bruse S., Hill K. L., Donelson J. E. (2000) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 111, 67–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kelly S., Reed J., Kramer S., Ellis L., Webb H., Sunter J., Salje J., Marinsek N., Gull K., Wickstead B., Carrington M. (2007) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 154, 103–109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Wirtz E., Leal S., Ochatt C., Cross G. A. (1999) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 99, 89–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Birkett C. R., Foster K. E., Johnson L., Gull K. (1985) FEBS Lett. 187, 211–218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Burleigh B. A., Caler E. V., Webster P., Andrews N. W. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 609–620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Morty R. E., Lonsdale-Eccles J. D., Mentele R., Auerswald E. A., Coetzer T. H. T. (2001) Infect. Immun. 69, 2757–2761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Munday J. C., McLuskey K., Brown E., Coombs G. H., Mottram J. C. (2011) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 175, 49–57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Emmer B. T., Souther C., Toriello K. M., Olson C. L., Epting C. L., Engman D. M. (2009) J. Cell Sci. 122, 867–874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Field M. C., Allen C. L., Dhir V., Goulding D., Hall B. S., Morgan G. W., Veazey P., Engstler M. (2004) Microsc. Microanal. 10, 621–636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Liu W., Apagyi K., McLeavy L., Ersfeld K. (2010) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 169, 20–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Bastin P., Pullen T. J., Sherwin T., Gull K. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 3769–3777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Belenghi B., Romero-Puertas M. C., Vercammen D., Brackenier A., Inzé D., Delledonne M., Van Breusegem F. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 1352–1358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Alsford S., Turner D. J., Obado S. O., Sanchez-Flores A., Glover L., Berriman M., Hertz-Fowler C., Horn D. (2011) Genome Res. 21, 915–924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Absalon S., Blisnick T., Kohl L., Toutirais G., Doré G., Julkowska D., Tavenet A., Bastin P. (2008) Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 929–944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Emmer B. T., Nakayasu E. S., Souther C., Choi H., Sobreira T. J., Epting C. L., Nesvizhskii A. I., Almeida I. C., Engman D. M. (2011) Eukaryot. Cell 10, 455–463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Mills E., Price H. P., Johner A., Emerson J. E., Smith D. F. (2007) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 152, 22–34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Geiger A., Hirtz C., Bécue T., Bellard E., Centeno D., Gargani D., Rossignol M., Cuny G., Peltier J. B. (2010) BMC Microbiol. 10, 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bangs J. D., Brouch E. M., Ransom D. M., Roggy J. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 18387–18393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Broadhead R., Dawe H. R., Farr H., Griffiths S., Hart S. R., Portman N., Shaw M. K., Ginger M. L., Gaskell S. J., McKean P. G., Gull K. (2006) Nature 440, 224–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Oberholzer M., Langousis G., Nguyen H. T., Saada E. A., Shimogawa M. M., Jonsson Z. O., Nguyen S. M., Wohlschlelgel J. A., Hill K. L. (2011) Mol. Cell Proteomics, doi: M111.010538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Webb H., Carnall N., Vanhamme L., Rolin S., Van Den Abbeele J., Welburn S., Pays E., Carrington M. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 103–114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Emmer B. T., Daniels M. D., Taylor J. M., Epting C. L., Engman D. M. (2010) Eukaryot. Cell 9, 934–942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Pop C., Salvesen G. S. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 21777–21781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Silverman J. M., Reiner N. E. (2011) Cell Microbiol. 13, 1–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Grébaut P., Chuchana P., Brizard J. P., Demettre E., Seveno M., Bossard G., Jouin P., Vincendeau P., Bengaly Z., Boulangé A., Cuny G., Holzmuller P. (2009) Int. J. Parasitol. 39, 1137–1150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






