Cestode Antigens Induce a Tolerogenic-Like Phenotype and Inhibit LPS Inflammatory Responses in Human Dendritic Cells

Abstract

Pathogens have developed strategies to modify Dendritic Cells (DCs) phenotypes and impair their functions in order to create a safer environment for their survival. DCs responses to helminths and their derivatives vary among different studies. Here we show that excretory/secretory products of the cestode Taenia crassiceps (TcES) do not induce the maturation of human DCs judged by a lack of increment in the expression of CD83, HLA-DR, CD80 and CD86 molecules but enhanced the production of IL-10 and positively modulated the expression of the C-type lectin receptor MGL and negatively modulated the expression of DC-SIGN. Additionally, these antigens were capable of down-modulating the inflammatory response induced by LPS in these cells by reducing the expression of the maturation markers and the production of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, TNF, IL-12 and IL-6. The effects of TcES upon the DCs responses to LPS were stronger if cells were exposed during their differentiation to the helminth antigens. All together, these findings suggest the ability of TcES to induce the differentiation of human DCs into a tolerogenic-like phenotype and to inhibit the effects of inflammatory stimuli.

Introduction

Dendritic cells fulfill a major role in the immune system directing the kind and the intensity of the response mounted against the diverse antigens and autoantigens encountered ¹. Thus, these cells can determine whether immunity or tolerance is exerted among the plethora of possible stimuli ². Different DCs subsets ^3-4, phenotypes ^5-6 and even microenvironments to which these cells are exposed ^7-8, may determine the type of immune response induced by them. However, in general terms, immature DCs (iDCs) that face a pathogenic stimulus will enter in a process characterized by the expression of maturation and co-stimulation molecules as well as the production of cytokines that promote and modulate inflammation and effector cell functions, including IL-12, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF and IL-8 ¹. All these features allow DCs to trigger full lymphocyte responses ¹. On the contrary in a steady state, DCs will not display an enhanced expression of maturation markers and they will rather show an increased secretion of regulatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β ^9-11. Interestingly, these DCs have been described as cells capable of inducing tolerance instead of immunoreactivity ¹². DCs express a wide repertory of receptors that allow them to interact with pathogens, tissue-derived danger signals and self-antigens ¹. Among these, Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) are differentially expressed by subsets ¹³ and perhaps phenotypes ¹⁴ of DCs. The cross-talk known to occur between these receptors can either inhibit or enhance specific signals in DCs, thereby modulating their phenotype and function and accounting for the different pathways to tolerance or immune activation ^{13, 15-17}. Since changes in the expression or activity of CLRs and TLRs can influence crucial aspects of the immune response, targeting these receptors is not surprisingly one of the mechanisms that parasites presumably use to impair DCs function and improve their survival within the host ^18-19.

Helminth antigens have been a matter of intense research during the last years due to their capacity to modulate immune responses ²⁰. Described modulatory properties range from suppression of antigen-specific and unspecific T cell responses ^21-22 to induction of specific cells responses such as alternatively activated macrophages and regulatory T cells ^23-24. In recent years, it has been shown that helminth antigens can also affect the response of DCs, presumably as a strategy to divert the immune response elicited against them ²⁵. Nevertheless it has been demonstrated that different helminth-derived molecules can affect DCs responses, it has not been possible to define a general phenotype induced by these parasites since distinct effects upon these cells have been observed. For instance, while some studies have shown that helminth antigens derived from Ascaris suum ²⁶, Schistosoma mansoni ²⁷, Nippostrongylus brasiliensis ²⁸ or Fasciola hepatica ²⁹ induce costimulatory molecule expression on DCs and production of inflammatory cytokines as IL-12p40, TNF or IL-6, other studies using Heligmosomoides polygyrus ²⁴ and once again S. mansoni ³⁰, have reported immature phenotypes with no cytokine secretion, indicating that different helminths and even different molecules derived from the same helminth can affect DCs activity in various ways.

To date most studies have addressed the activity that nematode and trematode-derived antigens exert upon DCs while the effects of cestode antigens on these cells are much less well explored. Most importantly, most of these studies have been done using mouse-derived DCs limiting our knowledge regarding the modulatory activity of helminth-derived antigens on human DCs. Taenia crassiceps is a cestode parasite of rodents and canines that shares a remarkable antigenic resemblance with the cestode parasite of humans Taenia solium ^31-32; thus, this parasite has been used as a model for the study of cysticercosis for many years ^33-34. Recently, we described that Taenia crassiceps excreted-secreted antigens (TcES) impair murine bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs) function down-modulating their TLR-mediated pro-inflammatory activity and inducing Th2 responses in allogenic assays ³⁵. However, the activity of these modulatory antigens on human DCs has not been addressed to date.

Here we explored the capacity of TcES to modulate the phenotype of human DCs responses. We found that despite the source of these antigens is not a human parasite, they can indeed modify human DCs phenotype and function. TcES did not induce maturation of DCs but instead down-modulated the expression of maturation and co-stimulatory molecules in response to the pro-inflammatory stimulus LPS. Even more, TcES enhanced production of IL-10 by these DCs but not IL-12, IL-1β, TNF and IL-6. Also, TcES dramatically reduced the production of these pro-inflammatory cytokines after LPS stimulation and this effect was more pronounced when DCs were exposed to the antigens when they were being differentiated from monocytes. Moreover, TcES modulated the expression of PRRs involved on key functions of DCs such as DC-SIGN and MGL. All together, these results indicate that TcES induce a tolerogenic-like phenotype in human DCs and down-modulate the inflammatory response that LPS induces in these cells.

Materials and Methods

Parasites and antigens

Metacestodes of T. crassiceps were harvested under sterile conditions from the peritoneal cavity of female Balb/c mice after 2-4 months of infection. The cysticerci were washed four times with sterile PBS and maintained in culture in PBS at 37°C for 24h. TcES were recovered from the supernatant and centrifuged for 10 min at 1000g. The upper fraction was concentrated using 50kDa Amicon Ultra Filter (Millipore). Protease inhibitors were added to the ≥50kDa fraction and samples were stored at -70°C until further use.

Monocyte-derived dendritic cells

Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained from buffy coats of 15 healthy blood donors from the Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez´s blood bank. Informed consent was obtained for the use of blood samples according to the declaration of Helsinki and the local scientific and ethics committees approved the protocol. PBMC were isolated by Ficoll-gradient centrifugation (GE Healthcare), analyzed in a Coulter AcT for cellular types (Beckman Coulter) and 3X10⁶ monocytes were left to adhere in 6-well culture plates for 2h. After this period, non-adherent cells were washed away and adherent cells were cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% SFB and penicillin/streptomycin in presence of 400 U/ml of IL-4 and 800 U/ml of GM-CSF during 6 days with replacement of medium and cytokines at day 3. For experiments assessing the effects of TcES during DC differentiation cells received 20ug/ml of TcES at day 0 and 3 (pre-stimulation). At day 6 non-adherent cells were recovered and placed for 24h in fresh medium. At this point we determined by flow cytometry the percentage of CD11c+ cells and for all experiments this was ≥ 80%. At day 7, both pre-stimulated and not pre-stimulated cells were challenged with 20ug/ml TcES, 1ug/ml LPS or a combination of them for 24h. For the real-time PCR analysis cells were stimulated for a period of 3h using the same stimuli. DCs derived from donors numbered 1-6 were used for the analysis of cell surface markers. DCs derived from donors numbered 1-9 were used for the analysis of cytokine production by ELISA. DCs derived from donors 10-15 were used for the analysis of mRNA expression. 1 X 10⁶ DCs were used for each assay.

Quantification of cytokine production

Supernatants were recovered after the 24h stimulation period and production of the cytokines TNF, IL-6, IL-12, IL-10 (Peprotech), IL-23, IL-1β and TGF-β (R&D) was measured by ELISA kits in the supernatants of DCs cultures. For the analysis of cytokine mRNAs levels cells were recovered from cultures 3h post-stimulation.

Analysis of cell surface markers

Surface expression of maturation and co-stimulatory molecules was analyzed using multicolor flow cytometry. Human DCs were harvested post-stimulation, washed and suspended in FACS buffer (PBS/FBS 5%/0.05% NaN₃). Fc receptors were blocked with 1μg/μl of human IgG for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were washed and triple stained with an APC-conjugated antibody against CD11c, FITC conjugated antibodies against Human Leukocyte Antigen-DR (HLA-DR) and CD80 and PE-conjugated antibodies against CD83 and CD86 (all antibodies from Biolegend). Cells were analyzed on a FACsCalibur flow cytometer using Cell Quest software (Beckton Dickinson).

Quantitative real-time PCR

Cells (10⁶) were lysed in 1000 μl TRIzol (Invitrogen) and incubated for 5 min at RT in presence of 1ul of Glycogen (20ug/ul stock) (Invitrogen). RNA was subsequently isolated from the water phase according to the manufacturer's instruction. The cDNA was generated using 250 ng of total RNA, random hexamers and the Transcriptor first strand cDNA synthesis kit (ROCHE). RT-qPCR analysis was performed using the LightCycler 2.0 system (ROCHE) with LNA hydrolysis probes from the Universal Probe Library Roche (UPL), and intron spanning primers (Table 1) from Invitrogen. One µl of cDNA was amplified with 400nM of primers, 100 nM of UPL probe, with the LighCycler TaqMan® Master (ROCHE) followed by 45 cycles of 95° 10 sec. 60° 30 sec., and 72° 1 sec. Reference genes ACTB and GAPDH transcripts were used for relative quantification. The mRNA relative quantification of target genes was conducted using the LightCycler software 4.1, according to the 2-ΔΔCt method. The calibrator sample employed was the non-stimulated DCs.

Table 1.

Primers for RT-qPCR.

Gene	GENEBANK	PRIMERS (5´-3´)	Amplicon Size (bp)	PROBE UPL
TLR2	NM_003264.3	CGTTCTCTCAGGTGACTGCTC	66	#14
		TCTCCTTTGGATCCTGCTTG
TLR4	NM_138554.2	CTGCGTGAGACCAGAAAGC	75	#33
		TTCAGCTCCATGCATTGATAA
CD209 (DC SIGN)	NM_021155.3 NM_001144893.1 NM_001144894.1 NM_001144895.1 NM_001144896.1 NM_001144897.1 NM_001144899.1	CCCAGCTCGTCGTAATCAA	80	#73
		CCAGGTGAAGCGGTTACTTC
M6PR (Manose Receptor)	NM_002355.2	GCTGGAGGACTGGACTGCTA	62	#76
		TGTCTGCCAGGATTCTCTCAC
CLEC10A (Clec)	NM_006344.2 NM_182906.2	GAATCACACCCTCCAGACCTC	83	#16
		TCTGAGGTTGTCACAGCTGAA
IL23	NM_016584.2	TGTTCCCCATATCCAGTGTG	77	#76
		TCCTTTGCAAGCAGAACTGA
TGFB1	NM_000660.3	GCAGCACGTGGAGCTGTA	76	#72
		CAGCCGGTTGCTGAGGTA
ACTB	NM_001101.3	CCAACCGCGAGAAGATGA	97	#64
		CCAGAGGCGTACAGGGATAG
GADPH	NM_002046.3	AGCCACATCGCTCAGACAC	66	#60
		GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC

RT-qPCR assays were intron spaning. DC SIGN and CLEC isoforms mRNAs enlisted were detected by the assays.

Statistics

Data are expressed as mean and standard errors. Comparisons were performed by the Wilcoxon signed rank (matched pairs) test. Significance was set on a p value<0.05. All analyses were performed with the GraphPad Prism v. 5 statistical software.

Results

Human DCs exposed to TcES show an immature-like phenotype

The maturation status of DCs can shape the balance to tolerance or immunity. Interestingly, different pathogens can interfere with this process on DCs hence affecting the infection outcome ^{2, 25}.To determine the maturation status of human DCs exposed to TcES, LPS or both, we performed three-color cytometric analysis using the molecules HLA-DR (MHCII), CD83, CD80 and CD86 as markers.

We found that TcES, the excreted-secreted antigens of the cestode T. crassiceps, did not induce maturation of human DCs as judged by the absence of up-regulation (compared to those that only received medium) of any of the maturation and co-stimulation molecules tested in this study (Fig.1A). As expected, DCs that received LPS expressed HLA-DR molecules and showed a significant increment in CD83, CD80 and CD86 expression compared to non-stimulated cells, indicating they were fully mature (Fig 1A). However, when these cells were exposed to a combination of LPS plus TcES, the presence of CD83, CD80 and CD86 dropped, suggesting that TcES interfere with the typical maturation process induced by pro-inflammatory stimuli such as LPS.

Figure 1.

Expression of maturation markers in human DCs induced by TcES. A) iDCs were stimulated with 20μg of TcES, 1μg of LPS or a combination of them and 24h post-stimulation were stained with anti-CD83, anti-CD80, anti-CD86 and anti-HLA-DR and analyzed by flow-cytometry. B) iDCs stimulated with 20μg of TcES, 1μg of LPS or a combination of them vs human monocytes that were exposed to 20ug/ml of TcES at day 0 and 3 of their differentiation to DCs. Once differentiated in iDCs they were stimulated with LPS, LPS+TcES or TcES alone. DCs derived from donors 1-6 (six donors) were used for this analysis. Assays were performed once for each donor. Data represents means ± standard error of six independent experiments. *P<0.05 was deemed significant.

Others have reported that monocytes exposed to helminth antigens have an impaired capability to differentiate into DCs ^36-37. In addition, infection with metacestodes is accompanied by antigens in circulation ^38-39 that might affect the activity of monocytes. To assess if the differentiation of monocytes into DCs was affected by TcES we added these antigens to our cultures at day 0 and 3. We found that there was no difference in the proportion of CD11c+ cells between cultures that received TcES during their differentiation and the ones that received it only as a final challenge, indicating that TcES did not affect the capability of human monocytes to differentiate into DCs (Fig 1B). Additionally, DCs that received TcES during their differentiation and were re-challenged at day 7 with TcES, LPS or the combination of them, responded in the same way as the cells that received the antigens only when they were mature; this is, those exposed to TcES showed an immature phenotype and the ones exposed to LPS plus TcES expressed significantly less maturation and co-stimulation molecules compared to those that received only LPS. An exception was found for CD83, where early exposure to TcES affected significantly its expression after LPS stimulation when compared to DCs that were not exposed to such antigens during differentiation (Fig 1B).

TcES induce production of IL-10 by human DCs and impaired their LPS-inflammatory cytokine response

It is well known that soluble factors released by DCs after pathogen exposure are considered the third signal needed for lymphocyte activation and polarization of immune responses ⁴⁰. In contrast to those related to exposure to virus, bacteria or fungi, the soluble factors released by DCs after exposure to helminths are less well characterized. Human DCs phenotype in response to TcES, LPS and LPS/TcES was also assessed by determining their cytokine profile.

In our experiments, TcES failed to induce production of the cytokines IL-12, TNF, IL-1β and IL-6 by human DCs but interestingly these antigens induced the production of the regulatory cytokine IL-10. When DCs were stimulated with LPS, levels of all the cytokines were enhanced (Fig. 2) however; combination of LPS and TcES diminished cytokine LPS response of IL-12, TNF, IL-1β and IL-6, leaving IL-10 production unchanged.

Figure 2.

Cytokine response of human DCs exposed to TcES. Monocyte-derived DCs were stimulated with 20μg of TcES, 1μg of LPS or a combination of them. A) Supernatants were collected 24h post-stimulation and cytokine response was measured using commercial ELISA kits (Peprotech and R&D). DCs derived from donors 1-9 (nine donors) were used for this analysis. Assays were performed in duplicate. Data represents means ± standard error of nine independent experiments. * P<0.05 was deemed significant. LPS vs RPMI was significantly different for all cytokines B) Cells were collected 3h post-stimulation and RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent and analysis of RT-qPCR was performed according to M&M. DCs derived from donors 10-15 (six donors) were used for this analysis. Assays were performed in duplicate. Data represents means ± standard error of six independent experiments. *P<0.05 was deemed significant.

The levels of IL-23 and TGF-β detected by ELISA were too low to make a proper quantification of them, so we decided to determine the transcription of mRNA of these cytokines by RT-qPCR. We found that as expected, LPS enhanced the transcripts of the inflammatory cytokine IL-23 and the addition of TcES did not influence this increment. TcES by itself did not induce an up-regulation of this messenger confirming its non pro-inflammatory activity (Fig. 2B). Even when the expression of TGF-β was somewhat higher in response to TcES, it was not statistically significant (Fig. 2B)

Interestingly, when human DCs were exposed to TcES during their differentiation, the effect of these antigens on LPS-induced cytokine production was more pronounced. In this scenario, LPS-induced production of IL-12, TNF and IL-6 was significantly down-regulated in cells that received TcES during their differentiation compared to those cells that did not. The addition of TcES plus LPS reduced even further the production of IL-12 and TNF (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Comparison of cytokine response of human DCs exposed during differentiation from monocytes or at the end of their differentiation to TcES. Human monocytes were exposed to 20ug/ml of TcES at day 0 and 3 of their differentiation to DCs. Once differentiated in iDCs they were stimulated with LPS, LPS+TcES or TcES alone. Supernatants were collected 24h post-stimulation and production of cytokines measured using ELISA kits. DCs derived from donors 1-9 (nine donors) were used for this analysis. Assays were performed in duplicate. Data represents means ± standard error of nine independent experiments. *P<0.05 was deemed significant.

TcES modulates expression of CLRs but not TLRs in human DCs

In order to assess if changes induced in DC phenotype by TcES was extended to CLRs and TLRs previously reported as important in the responses to helminth antigens ²⁵, we performed RT-qPCR analysis to human DCs exposed to TcES, LPS and the combination of them.

We found that TcES modulate positively the transcription of the C-type lectin receptor MGL while LPS failed to do so (Fig 4). When the stimulus was a combination of TcES and LPS the MGL up-regulation was again observed, indicating that TcES is able to induce its transcriptional enhancement even in the presence of a complete different stimulus such as LPS. On the contrary, the transcription of another C-type lectin receptor, DC-SIGN, was diminished only in presence of TcES but not of LPS or LPS plus TcES. The mRNA expression of the mannose receptor was not modified under any stimuli tested in this study. Similarly, when we explored the activity of TcES on the expression of the two TLRs involved in LPS recognition, TLR2 and TL4, we did not observe any modulation (Fig 4).

Figure 4.

CLR and TLR expression in human DCs exposed to TcES. mRNA levels of MGL, DC-SIGN, MR, TLR4 and TLR2 were determined by RT-qPCR according to M&M in human DC exposed during 3h to 20μg of TcES, 1μg of LPS or a combination of them. DCs derived from donors 10-15 (six donors) were used for analysis. Assays were performed in duplicate. Data represents means ± standard error of six independent experiments. *P<0.05 was deemed significant.

Discussion

In this work we demonstrated that the excreted-secreted antigens of the cestode T. crassiceps (TcES) modify the phenotype of human DCs. We found that when exposed to TcES, these cells acquired a phenotype compatible with tolerogenic DCs judged by their low levels of maturation markers such as CD83, CD80 and CD86 and the lack of secretion of inflammatory cytokines but instead an enhanced production of IL-10. The effects of TcES upon DCs were not limited to their capacity to induce a tolerogenic-like phenotype, since these antigens also down-modulated the pro-maturation and pro-inflammatory activities that LPS exerts on DCs, by reducing the expression of CD83, CD80, CD86 and the production of IL-12, TNF, IL-1β and IL-6 but interestingly, not the one of IL-10.

Our results are in accordance with other reports describing that DCs show an “immature” phenotype after exposure to helminth antigens and where such exposure can also impair the subsequent TLR-mediated response induced in these cells ^{30, 41}. However, IL-10 production by DCs exposed to helminth antigens has not been a common observation. For instance, others have found that DCs exposed to Echinococcus granulosus or Trichuris muris-derived antigens had an enhanced production of IL-10, however these cells also produced significant amounts of TNF and/or IL-6 ^{36, 42}. The induction of IL-10 by TcES may also possibly explain the apparent selective down-modulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines by TcES in DCs challenged with LPS. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report an enhanced production of the regulatory IL-10 by human DCs in response to helminth antigens, with no concomitant secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, reinforcing the idea of the induction of a tolerogenic-like phenotype in these cells by TcES. It will be crucial to address if these DCs, besides its tolerogenic phenotype, are consequently able of inducing T regulatory responses.

As we stated earlier, most of the tolerogenic DCs described to date display an immature like-phenotype characterized by a lower expression of co-stimulatory molecules, a decreased production of pro-inflammatory key cytokines such as IL-12 and a preferential production of regulatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β ^9-11. Treatment of DCs with agents as IL-10 or corticoids stimulates their differentiation into a tolerogenic type ^{2, 7-8, 43}. Particularly, tolerogenic DCs that receive dexamethasone show a differential expression of the CLRs DC-SIGN, MR and MGL, where only the last one is up-regulated ¹⁴. Interestingly, we found that human DCs exposed to TcES express a MGL transcriptional up-regulation, suggesting once again an induction of a tolerogenic phenotype in these cells. DC-SIGN is another CLR with important functions in DCs. This receptor not only supports recognition and internalization of pathogens for a later antigen presentation but it is also involved in shaping dendritic and T cell responses ⁴⁴. Interestingly, we observed that TcES but not LPS, down-modulated transcriptional expression of DC-SIGN in human DCs. In accordance with our findings, it has been shown that the human herpesvirus 6 ⁴⁵, Leishmania donovani, L. major ⁴⁶, and the helminth Brugia malayi ⁴⁷ are able to reduce the expression of this CLR in DCs, presumably interfering with their function. Considering that the balance between the TLR and the CLR repertoire and their functional cooperation participate in the fine-tuning of regulatory mechanisms to allow appropriate immune responses, the over-expression of MGL in DCs exposed to TcES and the simultaneous down-regulation of DC-SIGN, may be part of the possible mechanisms used by T. crassiceps to modify the phenotype and hence the function of human DCs, directing the balance towards immune suppression and allowing in this way its own survival. We have previously shown that T. crassiceps antigens are heavily glycosilated ¹⁸ and that the carbohydrates present in these antigens are critical for their modulatory activities ^{18, 35, 48}. For these reasons, it is not surprising that TcES could modulate the expression of receptors such as MGL and DC-SIGN, which recognize sugar moieties. In fact, T. crassiceps antigens are glycosilated ⁴⁹ with the specific carbohydrates known to be recognized at least by DC-SIGN. More studies are necessary to address if the mRNA pattern of expression of CLRs observed in this study in DCs exposed to TcES is also observed at the protein level, but yet more important is to determine if these receptors are involved in the recognition of and in the modulatory activity that T. crassiceps-antigens exert on human DCs.

Our results indicate that DCs challenged with TcES can impair their response to LPS by inhibiting the maturation process and reducing the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12, IL-1β, TNF and IL-6, suggesting that TcES render these DCs unable to mature and probably incapable to support an inflammatory response after challenged with to a TLR stimulus. In this study we also examined the response of monocytes to TcES during their differentiation into DCs. In contrast with other studies that have shown that helminths or their products can affect the differentiation of monocytes into DCs ^36-37, we found that exposure of monocytes to TcES did not affect the final percentage of CD11c+ cells, suggesting that differentiation of monocytes into DCs is not affected by TcES. However, when stimulated with LPS, TcES-differentiated DCs showed a significant reduction in the percentage of CD83+ cells and a more pronounced dropping in their production of IL-1β, TNF and IL-6 when compared with DCs that were not exposed to TcES during their differentiation, suggesting that if monocytes encounter excreted/secreted antigens of T. crassiceps in their differentiation process to DCs, this could greatly affect their ability to mature and to respond to subsequent TLR stimulation. This is a plausible scenario to happen also in vivo since it has been reported that infections with metacestodes are accompanied with the release of antigens to circulation ^38-39.

There has been a lot of speculation regarding the use of helminth antigens as modulators in autoimmune disorders ^50-51. Recent findings indicate that the cestode T. crassiceps is capable of ameliorating autoimmune pathologies in animal models ⁵². Importantly, despite this cestode is not a human parasite in this work we demonstrate that its molecules have a modulatory activity upon human cells, opening the possibility to use these antigens as modulators in human disorders. A possible explanation for the conserved activity of TcES across species may simply rely on the immunogenic resemblance between the human cestode parasite T. solium and T. crassiceps ^{32, 53}.

In summary, here we show that TcES induce a tolerogenic-like phenotype in human DCs as judged by the lack of enhancement of maturation and co-stimulatory molecules, an elevated production of IL-10 and the up-regulation of MGL expression. Additionally, these antigens are capable of impair the LPS pro-inflammatory activity in the same cells, down-modulating their maturation and secretion of inflammatory cytokines.