Skip to main content
The Journal of Nutrition logoLink to The Journal of Nutrition
. 2011 Oct 26;141(12):2159–2165. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.146498

Soy Content of Basal Diets Determines the Effects of Supplemental Selenium in Male Mice123

Trevor E Quiner 4, Heather L Nakken 4, Brock A Mason 4, Edwin D Lephart 5, Chad R Hancock 4, Merrill J Christensen 4,6,*
PMCID: PMC3223873  PMID: 22031663

Abstract

The effects of supplemental Se in rodent models may depend upon composition of the basal diet to which it is added. Wild-type male littermates of Transgenic Adenocarcinoma of Mouse Prostate mice were fed until 18 wk of age 1 of 2 Se-adequate stock diets high in soy (HS) or low in phytoestrogens (LP) or the same diets supplemented with 3.0 mg Se/kg diet as seleno-methylselenocysteine. Body and abdominal fat pad weights were lower (P < 0.01) in mice fed the HS diet. Supplemental Se reduced fat pad weights in mice receiving the LP diet but increased body and fat pad weights in mice consuming the HS formulation (P-interaction < 0.005). Serum free triiodothyronine concentrations were unaffected by supplemental Se in mice fed the LP diet but were decreased by Se supplementation of mice given the HS feed (P-interaction < 0.02). Free thyroxine concentrations were higher in mice consuming the HS diet regardless of Se intake (P < 0.001). Hepatic mRNA for iodothyronine deiodinase I was lower (P < 0.001) in mice fed the HS diet. Supplementation of Se increased this mRNA (P < 0.001) in both diet groups. Results from this study show a significant interaction between the composition of basal diets and the effects of supplemental Se with respect to body composition. These findings have important implications for future studies in rodent models of the effects of supplemental Se on heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other conditions related to body weight and composition.

Introduction

The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial, involving over 35,500 participants, was terminated prematurely in 2008 due the failure of supplements of vitamin E (all rac-α-tocopheryl acetate) and Se (as selenomethionine) to reduce the risk of prostate cancer and to an unexpected slight increase in risk of prostate cancer and type 2 diabetes in men receiving vitamin E and Se, respectively (1). This failure of supplemental Se and vitamin E to provide the expected protective effects has led not only to a critical reevaluation of previous epidemiologic and intervention studies showing benefits of supplementation with these nutrients (24), but also to a reconsideration of the adequacy of current animal models and feeding protocols to accurately mimic the effects of dietary components in humans (5).

Numerous studies have been conducted to examine the effects of Se on development and progression of prostate cancer in rodent models (Table 1). In all studies in which the basal diet was free of phytoestrogens (semipurified diets and others labeled “free of phytoestrogens”) (611), Se supplementation was efficacious regardless of the chemical form given, its mode of delivery, or the rodent model used. In contrast, in those studies in which the reported basal diet included soy (1214), a rich source of phytoestrogens, Se supplements had no significant effects, regardless of their chemical form or the animal model in which they were tested. In the reports of five other studies, the basal diet was described only as “commercial rodent chow” (15, 16) or was not stated (1719). These observations strongly suggest that effects of supplemental Se may be determined by the composition of the basal diet to which it is added.

TABLE 1.

Previous studies of prostate cancer prevention by Se in rodents1

Reference Species Inducing agent Se form(s) Se concentration Delivery mode Basal diet2 Results
(11) TRAMP2 mouse Transgenic MSA 3.0 mg/kg BW Daily oral gavage AIN-93M (Harlan-Teklad) Decreased neuro-endocrine tumors
(14) Noble rat T + E2 SeMet 1.5, 3.0 mg/kg diet Diet NIH-07 (Harlan-Teklad) No effect
(12) Wistar-Unilever rat MNU + T SeMet, Se yeast 1.3, 3.0, 9.0 mg/kg diet Diet Teklad 4%, Purina 5001 No effect
(7) Copenhagen rat Dunning R3327 tumors MSC 1 mg/kg diet Diet AIN-93G Decreased tumor area, weight
(10) TRAMP mouse Transgenic MSA, MSC 3 mg/kg BW Daily oral gavage AIN-93M (Harlan-Teklad) Decreased tumor weight; increased survival
(9) Lady mouse Transgenic SeMet (in combination with vitamin E + lycopene) “Human equivalent of 200 μg/d” Diet Purina Mills Test Diet “free of phyto-estrogens” Increased survival; decreased PCa, metastases
(15) Nude mouse DU145 xenografts MSA 4 mg/kg BW Single oral dose daily “commercial rodent chow” Increased apoptosis
(16) Nude mouse DU145, PC3 xenografts MSA, MSC, Se-Met, selenite 4 mg/kg BW Daily single oral dose “commercial rodent chow” (Harlan-Teklad) Decreased tumor volume, weight, angiogenesis; increased apoptosis
(17) Nude mouse LAPC-4 xenografts Selenite 2 mg/kg BW Intraperitoneal injection 3X/wk Not stated Decreased tumor volume, PSA
(18) Nude mouse LNCaP xenografts MSC 100 μg/mouse Intraperitoneal daily injection Not stated Decreased tumor growth, PSA, AR expression
(8) Lady mouse Transgenic SeMet (in combination with vitamin E + lycopene) “Human equivalent of 200 μg/d” Diet Purina Mills Test Diet“free of phyto-estrogens” 75% decrease in PCa incidence, PCNA; increased p27
(6) Nude mouse PC3 orthotopic xenografts Selenate, SeMet,MSC, Se yeast 0.3, 3.0 mg/L Drinking water Research Diets Inc. D19101(semipurified) Selenite (3.0 mg/L) decreased tumor growth
(19) Wistar-Unilever rat MNU + T SeMet 1.5, 3.0 mg/kg diet Diet Not stated No effect
(13) F344 Rat DMAB Not stated 2 mg/kg diet Diet Oriental MF, Oriental YeastCo, Ltd. No effect
1

AR, androgen receptor; BW, body weight; DMAB, 3,2′-dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl; E2, 17β-estradiol; MNU, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea; MSA, methylseleninic acid; MSC, seleno-methylselenocysteine; p27, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B; PCa, prostate cancer; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; PSA, prostate specific antigen; SeMet, L-selenomethionine; T, testosterone; TRAMP, Transgenic Adenocarcinoma of Mouse Prostate; Vitamin E, D-α-tocopherol succinate.

2

For each basal diet the complete description of the diet and its source, as included by the authors in the cited reference, is given.

Evidence that a high intake of soy constituents by humans is associated with lower prostate cancer incidence has been extensively reviewed (2024) and results from preclinical experiments are generally in agreement (2528). Several commercially available rodent nonpurified diets include high concentrations of dehulled soybean meal (29). Chemopreventive dietary components, such as Se, when added as supplements to a basal diet high in soy may show limited additional protection beyond that provided by the high concentration of preventive substances already in the basal diet.

The possible effects of high soy intake from commercial rodent diets on various experimental endpoints have been reviewed (30, 31). The potential for producing spurious results due to unsuspected interactions of supplements with soy in basal diets may be quite high. For example, Hsu et al. (25) showed that soy in combination with green tea produced significant protective effects in a rat model of prostate cancer not seen with either component individually. Thus, the interaction of soy and green tea could exaggerate the apparent effects of green tea tested individually if experimental animals in such a study are fed basal diets high in soy.

To test the hypothesis that the soy content of a basal diet may determine effects of Se added to that diet, we examined mice exposed from conception to basal stock diets devoid of or high in soy, unsupplemented or supplemented with a naturally occurring food form of Se. Our previous work in healthy rats showed a potential interaction of soy and Se (32, 33). In this study, we chose to examine aspects of thyroid hormone metabolism, body weight, and body fat as indicators of possible interactions. Se plays a role in thyroid hormone metabolism by means of its incorporation into and activation of Se-dependent deiodinases (34, 35). These selenoenzymes catalyze interconversions among thyroid hormones, which are major regulators of metabolic rate. In addition, previous work from our laboratory and others has repeatedly demonstrated an antiobesogenic effect in rodents of high soy consumption (33, 3639). Thus, we reasoned that examination of thyroid hormone metabolism and body composition could reveal interactions of Se and soy and suggest possible mechanisms for their combined effects. This work provides evidence that basal diet composition may significantly alter the apparent effects of nutrients, other dietary components, or plant chemicals that are added to those diets as supplements.

Materials and Methods

Animals and housing.

All procedures involving animals were approved by the Brigham Young University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were housed in shoebox cages with wood chip bedding in a temperature- and light-controlled room (12 h, 0600–1800, light; 12 h, 1800–0600, dark) and were given free access to food (as described below) and tap water.

Male and female hemizygous C57BL/6 transgenic TRAMP7 mice (40), and male and female wild-type FVB mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory and used as breeders. Dams were fed one of the four experimental diets (described below) for at least 30 d before mating (32, 33). Hemizygous C57BL/6 TRAMP breeders were crossed with wild-type FVB mice to produce F1 wild-type C57BL/6 X FVB mice. Dams continued consuming their respective diets through pregnancy and lactation. Male pups were weaned at 21 d to the diets consumed by their dams and genotyped using standard techniques (41, 42).

Diets.

Mice were fed one of two pelleted basal stock diets, with or without a supplement of Se, in a 2 × 2 factorial design. The first was a modification of the NIH-07 open formula diet from which soy and alfalfa were eliminated to produce a low-phytoestrogen (LP) diet (Zeigler Bros; Phytoestrogen Reduced Rodent Diet I). The second was a closed formula, high-soy (HS) diet in which dehulled soybean meal was the most abundant ingredient (8604, Harlan Teklad) (Table 2). These diets have been compared to one another for their effects on various endpoints such as energy expenditure and adiposity (43), AMP kinase activation (44), fetal programming of glucose homeostasis (45), fertility (46), depression (47), gene expression regulation (32), and neuronal apoptosis (48). Previous analysis showed that the LP diet contained ~10 mg isoflavones (aglycone genistein + daidzein)/kg diet (49). In contrast, according to the manufacturer’s quarterly testing of the dehulled soybean meal included in the HS diet, this formulation would have provided a mean concentration of 620 mg isoflavones (range 420–700 mg)/kg diet during this study.

TABLE 2.

Composition of basal diets fed to mice with or without supplemental Se1

HS LP
Top 10 ingredients by weight
 1 Dehulled soybean meal Ground corn
 2 Wheat middlings Ground wheat
 3 Flaked corn Fish meal
 4 Ground corn Wheat middlings
 5 Fish meal Lactic casein
 6 Cane molasses Dried skim milk
 7 Ground wheat Corn gluten meal
 8 Dried whey Corn oil
 9 Soybean oil Brewers dried yeast
 10 Brewers dried yeast Dry molasses
Proximate composition
 Protein, g/kg 243 235
 Fat, g/kg 47 53
 Carbohydrate, g/kg 402 513
 Crude fiber, g/kg 40 25
 Neutral detergent fiber, g/kg 124 67
 Ash, g/kg 74 64.5
 Genistein + daidzein, g/kg 0.62 0.01
 Energy density, kJ/kg 12,560 14,528
 Energy from protein, % 32 27
 Energy from fat, % 14 14
 Energy from carbohydrate, % 54 59
Amino acids, g/kg
 Arginine 15.3 11.3
 Cystine 3.7 2.7
 Histidine 5.8 5.9
 Isoleucine 10.0 11.7
 Leucine 19.0 21.6
 Lysine 14.0 14.2
 Methionine 4.2 5.9
 Phenylalanine+tyrosine 20.0 20.7
 Threonine 9.4 9.4
 Tryptophan 2.9 2.5
 Valine 11.0 13.6
Minerals, mg/kg
 Calcium 14,000 12,000
 Chloride 5000 4300
 Cobalt 0.71 0.52
 Copper 25 13
 Iodine 2 1.84
 Iron 300 245
 Magnesium 3000 1500
 Manganese 100 96
 Phosphorus 11,000 9500
 Potassium 10,000 5500
 Se 0.34 0.45
 Sodium 3000 3000
 Zinc 80 60
Vitamins, mg/kg
 Biotin 0.38 0.37
 Cholecalciferol 0.060 0.125
 Choline 2530 1646
 Folate 3 3
 Menadione 40 3.1
 Niacin 63 76.5
 Pantothenic acid 21 31.7
 Riboflavin 8 7
 Thiamin 27 17.3
 Vitamin A 3.78 1.98
 Vitamin B-6 13 10
 Vitamin B-12 0.05 0.048
 Vitamin E 54 22
Linoleic acid, mg/kg 18.7 22.8
1

HS, high-soy; LP, low-phytoestrogen.

Basal diets contained 0.34–0.45 mg Se/kg diet, which is higher than the minimum concentration (0.15 mg Se/kg diet) recommended by the AIN (50). All other nutrients were provided in both diets at concentrations that met or exceeded the minimum recommendations of the AIN (50). One-half of the diets were supplemented with 3.0 mg Se/kg diet as MSC, a naturally occurring food form of this mineral, whose tissue uptake in rats was reported to be more efficient than that of other Se forms (51). This high but nontoxic concentration was used in previous studies of supplemental Se in rodent models (6, 12, 14, 19). The MSC used in this study was a generous gift of Kelatron Corporation (product no. BISEMC0501, Se-methylselenocysteine trituration 0.5%) and was incorporated into the diets by the manufacturers during formulation prior to pelleting.

In this work, 13 mice received the unsupplemented LP diet, 17 were given the unsupplemented HS diet, 7 were fed the Se-supplemented LP mixture, and 9 received the Se-supplemented HS formulation. The unequal numbers reflect the breeding efficiency of the pups’ dams and sires, which were fed the respective diets 1 mo before mating. When subsets of mice from each group, rather than the whole group, were analyzed (e.g., due to limiting serum volume for multiple replicates of hormone assays), mice were chosen at random for inclusion in those subsets.

Body composition and food intake.

Pups continued to receive their respective diets until 18 wk, when they were weighed then killed by decapitation. Blood was collected for serum analysis (33). Abdominal fat pads were dissected and weighed. Livers were harvested and flash frozen for subsequent analysis of Se status.

Food intake was measured during the 3 d before mice were killed. Mice were transferred into individual shoebox cages the morning of the third day preceding killing, with a measured amount of food. Each morning for the next 3 d, food remaining in the tray was weighed and uneaten food on the cage bottom was recovered and weighed to correct the estimate of food consumption. Fresh food was then added and the total amount available at the beginning of the next 24-h period was weighed. This procedure was repeated up to and including the morning of the day mice were killed.

Se status and serum hormone concentrations.

The Se status of mice was determined by assay of hepatic cytosolic GPX1 activity (52) and liver Se concentration (53), as we previously reported. Serum hormone concentrations were assayed using commercially available ELISA kits (Free T3 and Free T4 ELISA kits, no. F3106T and no. F4107T, respectively, Calbiotech.

Steady-state mRNA analysis.

Hepatic expression of the gene for Dio1 and for the invariant genes Hprt and Tbp (54) were quantified by real-time qPCR. Total RNA was isolated from mouse livers as previously described (32, 55, 56). Equal quantities from each of three individual pure and intact RNA samples, chosen at random within each dietary group, were combined to form a total RNA pool for that group. Total RNA pools were reverse transcribed using random hexamers. First-strand cDNA was used in real-time qPCR analysis (LightCycler, Roche Applied Science). The PCR primers used for genotyping and qPCR were designed using sequences in GenBank and the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s Primer-BLAST program (57) (Supplemental Table 1).

For each gene, at least three quantitative PCR analyses were performed. Each analysis included three replicates for each diet. The concentration of each sample was determined based on an internal standard curve using the second derivative maximum of the amplification curve as calculated by LightCycler software (version 2.0). Calculated concentrations for Dio1 replicates were normalized to the concentrations of the invariant genes Hprt and Tbp (32, 55, 56).

Statistical analysis.

Pearson’s correlational analysis was used to examine associations among body weight, body fat pads, liver Se concentrations, and serum hormone concentrations. ANOVA using the General Linear Model (Minitab) was used to determine main effects of Se and soy and their interactions. This was followed by Fisher’s pairwise comparisons to determine significance of differences between dietary groups, as we previously reported (33). Differences for which P values were 0.05 in 2-sided tests were considered significant.

For each gene, ANOVA followed by Fisher’s tests was performed on all Hprt/Tbp-normalized replicates for each dietary treatment. In addition, for each gene, a normalized mean value was calculated for each dietary group. To determine relative expression among the four dietary groups for each gene, the Hprt/Tbp-normalized mean for each of the other dietary groups was divided by the Hprt/Tbp-normalized mean of the LP-0 Se group (32).

Results

Food consumption and Se status.

Food intake and liver cytosol GPX1 activity were not significantly affected by the diet treatments (data not shown). Supplemental Se increased the liver Se concentration (P < 0.001), but neither soy nor the interaction had an effect (Fig. 1A).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Liver Se concentrations (A), body (B) and abdominal fat pad (C) weights, serum free T3 (D), and free T4 (E) concentrations, and hepatic Dio1 mRNA concentrations (F) of male mice exposed to a LP or HS diet with or without supplemental Se from conception through 18 wk of age. Values are mean ± SEM, n = 4–5 (A), 7–17 (B), 4–8 (C), 4–12 (D), 4–10 (E), and 8–9 (F). Significant effects (P < 0.05) of D, Se, and D × Se are shown. Means without a common letter differ, P < 0.05. D, diet; HS, high-soy; LP, low-phytoestrogen; T3, triiodothyronine; T4, thyroxine.

Body composition.

A high intake of soy was associated with a lower body weight (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1B) and there was an interaction between dietary soy and supplemental Se (P-interaction < 0.005). In mice fed the LP diet, body weight was not affected by supplemental Se, but in those receiving the HS diet, supplemental Se increased body weight (P < 0.05). Relative abdominal fat weight also was reduced by high soy intake (P < 0.001) and the interaction was significant. Supplemental Se reduced fat pad weights in mice fed the LP diet (P < 0.05) and increased them in mice fed the HS diet (P-interaction < 0.001).

Serum hormone concentrations.

Serum T3 concentrations were inversely correlated with body weight (r = −0.69; P = 0.006) and abdominal fat (r = −0.71; P = 0.005) (Fig. 1D). In mice fed the HS diet, serum T3 concentrations were higher (P < 0.001) than in mice given the LP formulation. Mice receiving Se supplements had slightly lower T3 concentrations overall than those that did not (P < 0.05). In mice fed the LP diet, supplemental Se did not affect T3 concentrations, whereas in mice given the HS diet, the Se supplement reduced serum T3 (P-interaction < 0.02).

Intake of the HS diet was associated with higher serum T4 concentrations (P < 0.001), but neither Se intake nor the interaction had a significant effect (Fig. 1E).

Steady-state iodothyronine deiodinase mRNA concentrations.

Supplemental Se increased mRNA for Dio1 (P < 0.001) regardless of the basal diet consumed, whereas intake of the HS diet was associated with lower concentrations (P < 0.001) of this mRNA, independent of dietary Se concentration (Fig. 1F). The interaction of Se and basal diet (P-interaction < 0.001) produced a greater effect of supplemental Se in mice fed the HS diet than in those receiving the LP formulation.

Discussion

Results from this study are consistent with previous work showing that: 1) provision of dietary Se to rodents in excess of the nutritionally adequate concentration increases tissue Se concentration but not activity of GPX1 (35, 50, 58); 2) high soy intake is associated with lower body weight and adiposity in animals and humans (30, 31, 33, 3639, 5961), whereas the main effect of Se on these measurements is not significant (33); and 3) high soy intake increases T3 concentrations, which leads to lower body and fat pad weights (60). This report shows a significant Se-soy interaction with respect to body weight and composition in mice.

In this study, one-half of the mice received a LP stock diet devoid of soy, whereas one-half was fed a HS stock diet, similar to those used in previous prostate cancer prevention studies. The HS diet provided soy components in their naturally occurring dietary blend. The Se supplement was also supplied in a naturally occurring, nutritionally relevant form of the mineral (7, 10, 16). Results from this approach are likely more relevant to human supplementation than other animal feeding protocols. Effects shown in animals consuming semipurified diets supplemented with a purified, isolated dietary component are not always seen when the same supplement is given to humans consuming self-selected mixed diets of ordinary foods (6264). This report is consistent with others showing that effects of supplements may be diet-dependent (65).

To determine which component or components in the basal diets may account for the differential effects of supplemental Se, we focused first on those compounds whose concentration differed most between the two formulations. Six ingredients (ground corn, ground wheat, fish meal, wheat middlings, molasses, Brewers yeast) were among the top 10 in both diets (Table 2). The largest difference in composition was in isoflavones, for which the concentration in the HS diet was >60 times greater than in the LP formulation. However, soy contains other biologically active compounds that confer health benefits (6668). In addition, stock diets made from natural ingredients can vary in both macro- and micronutrient composition. It is possible that other nutrients whose concentrations differed between diets may have contributed to the observed effects. This possibility was considered in the work of Bu and Lephart (69), who fed rats the two diets used in this study, plus a third diet (NIH-07) containing an intermediate concentration of soy and isoflavones (~0.20 g/kg). They observed an inverse association between body weight and soy content of the diets, with the highest body weights observed in rats fed the LP diet, intermediate weights in rats given the moderate-soy diet, and lowest weights in rats fed the HS diet. These results do not preclude the possibility that other components played a role in the observed dietary effects. However, although there was no consistent pattern among the diets in other nutrients, there was a clear inverse relationship and dose response between soy intake and body weight and fat. The lack of an association of body weight and fat with any other component of the diets except soy strongly argues that the effects of diet on body weight and composition seen in this work and many previous studies are due primarily to components found in soy.

The results of this study showed that the formulation of rodent basal diets may affect results and conclusions drawn in studies of Se supplements added to those diets. If the basal diet is low in soy, supplemental Se added to that diet may show antiobesogenic effects. In contrast, if the basal diet is high in soy, supplemental Se may promote adiposity. It should also be noted that the observation of a significant interaction between two dietary compounds does not by itself specify which component is altering the metabolism and effects of the other. An alternative interpretation of these data is that Se supplementation reduces the beneficial effects of high soy consumption. In this work, the antiobesogenic effects of soy were seen only in mice not given supplemental Se. In mice given a high-Se supplement, high soy intake had no effect on body weight or fat pad mass.

The iodothyronine deiodinases (DIO1, 2, and 3) are selenoenzymes that catalyze deiodinations of T4 to the active T3, to reverse T3, and also T3 to the inactive diiodothyronine (34, 35). Active T3 is generated for local use in specific tissues by DIO2, whereas DIO1 is primarily responsible for producing T3 for export into blood and maintaining systemic T3 concentrations. To the extent that higher Dio1 mRNA concentrations translate to higher DIO1 activity, it would be expected that a higher Dio1 mRNA concentration would be associated with lower T4 and higher T3 (because DIO1 converts T4 to T3), along with lower body weight and fat pads.

This pattern was seen in mice receiving the LP diet. In these mice, supplemental Se significantly increased Dio1, lowered T4, and decreased fat pads. In contrast, in mice fed the HS basal diet, the pattern of decreased T3 and increased body weight and fat pads due to Se supplementation, although internally consistent, would be expected to result from decreased Dio1 mRNA and activity rather than the increase seen (Fig. 1F). This may be due in part to the unexpectedly low Dio1 mRNA concentration in mice consuming the unsupplemented HS diet. Our observation of lower Dio1 mRNA concentrations and higher T4 concentrations in mice receiving the HS diet is internally consistent and agrees with results from both in vitro (70) and in vivo (71) studies showing that soy components can inhibit DIO1 activity and, in animals, produce corresponding increases in serum T4.

Other factors besides those examined in this study can play a role in determining each of the outcomes measured. The contributions of different deiodinases to tissue T3 concentrations, and their modulation by diet, remain to be explored. In addition, several other factors may affect activity of deiodinases and blood concentrations of T3 and T4 (34, 35). For example, estrogens stimulate thyroid hormone synthesis and release (72), which may explain in part the higher T3 and T4 concentrations observed in mice fed high concentrations of estrogen-like soy isoflavones. It is also reasonable to speculate that different molecules in soy may have variable affects on hormone metabolism that make it difficult to account for the overall influence of a complex mixture of such compounds.

In summary, this study provides evidence that the effects of Se supplementation can depend on the soy content of basal diets to which it is added. Supplemental Se increased Dio1 mRNA and reduced body fad pads in mice fed a zero-soy formulation representative of the average North American diet(37, 60). In contrast, in mice consuming a HS basal diet representative of typical Asian diets (37, 60), supplemental Se had the opposite effects of reducing serum T3 and increasing body weight and fat pads. These findings have important implications for researchers studying the effects of supplemental Se in rodent models of diseases related to body weight and composition. The antiobesogenic effects of high soy intake may include modulation of brown adipose tissue uncoupling protein-1, core body temperature, brain neuropeptide Y concentrations, or other metabolic regulators (60). The potential effects of supplemental Se on these processes in animals fed zero- and HS diets merit further investigation.

Supplementary Material

Online Supporting Material

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the invaluable technical assistance of John M. Harper, Scott E. Brunson, and Lina M. Qutob. T.E.Q., E.D.L., and M.J.C. designed the research; T.E.Q., H.L.N., B.A.M., C.R.H., and M.J.C. conducted the research; T.E.Q., H.L.N., C.R.H., and M.J.C. analyzed the data; H.L.N., E.D.L., and M.J.C. wrote the paper; and M.J.C. had primary responsibility for the final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Footnotes

1

Supported by NIH grant No. CA-122235 (M.J.C.).

3

Supplemental Table 1 is available from the “Online Supporting Material” link in the online posting of the article and from the same link in the online table of contents at jn.nutrition.org.

7

Abbreviations used: GPX1, Se-dependent glutathione peroxidase 1 (EC 1.11.1.9); HS, high-soy; LP, low-phytoestrogen; MSC, seleno-methylselenocysteine; T3, triiodothyronine; T4, thyroxine; TRAMP, Transgenic Adenocarcinoma of Mouse Prostate.

Literature Cited

  • 1.Lippman SM, Klein EA, Goodman PJ, Lucia MS, Thompson IM, Ford LG, Parnes HL, Minasian LM, Gaziano JM, Hartline JA, et al. Effect of selenium and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other cancers: The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). JAMA. 2009;301:39–51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dunn BK, Richmond ES, Minasian LM, Ryan AM, Ford LG. A nutrient approach to prostate cancer prevention: The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). Nutr Cancer. 2010;62:896–918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jiang L, Yang KH, Tian JH, Guan QL, Yao N, Cao N, Mi DH, Wu J, Ma B, Yang SH. Efficacy of antioxidant vitamins and selenium supplement in prostate cancer prevention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Cancer. 2010;62:719–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ledesma MC, Jung-Hynes B, Schmit TL, Kumar R, Mukhtar H, Ahmad N. Selenium and vitamin E for prostate cancer: post-SELECT (Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial) status. Mol Med. 2011;17:134–43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nguewa PA, Calvo A. Use of transgenic mice as models for prostate cancer chemoprevention. Curr Mol Med. 2010;10:705–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Corcoran NM, Najdovska M, Costello AJ. Inorganic selenium retards progression of experimental hormone refractory prostate cancer. J Urol. 2004;171:907–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lindshield BL, Ford NA, Canene-Adams K, Diamond AM, Wallig MA, Erdman JW., Jr Selenium, but not lycopene or vitamin E, decreases growth of transplantable dunning R3327-H rat prostate tumors. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Venkateswaran V, Fleshner NE, Sugar LM, Klotz LH. Antioxidants block prostate cancer in lady transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 2004;64:5891–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Venkateswaran V, Klotz LH, Ramani M, Sugar LM, Jacob LE, Nam RK, Fleshner NE. A combination of micronutrients is beneficial in reducing the incidence of prostate cancer and increasing survival in the Lady transgenic model. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009;2:473–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang L, Bonorden MJ, Li GX, Lee HJ, Hu H, Zhang Y, Liao JD, Cleary MP, Lu J. Methyl-selenium compounds inhibit prostate carcinogenesis in the transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate model with survival benefit. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009;2:484–95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang L, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Nkhata K, Quealy E, Liao JD, Cleary MP, Lu J. Lobe-specific lineages of carcinogenesis in the transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate and their responses to chemopreventive selenium. Prostate. 2011;71:1429–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McCormick DL, Rao KV, Johnson WD, Bosland MC, Lubet RA, Steele VE. Null activity of selenium and vitamin e as cancer chemopreventive agents in the rat prostate. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010;3:381–92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nakamura A, Shirai T, Takahashi S, Ogawa K, Hirose M, Ito N. Lack of modification by naturally occurring antioxidants of 3,2′-dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl-initiated rat prostate carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett. 1991;58:241–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ozten N, Horton L, Lasano S, Bosland MC. Selenomethionine and alpha-tocopherol do not inhibit prostate carcinogenesis in the testosterone plus estradiol-treated NBL rat model. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010;3:371–80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jiang W, Jiang C, Pei H, Wang L, Zhang J, Hu H, Lu J. In vivo molecular mediators of cancer growth suppression and apoptosis by selenium in mammary and prostate models: lack of involvement of gadd genes. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:682–91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li GX, Lee HJ, Wang Z, Hu H, Liao JD, Watts JC, Combs GF, Jr, Lu J. Superior in vivo inhibitory efficacy of methylseleninic acid against human prostate cancer over selenomethionine or selenite. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29:1005–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bhattacharyya RS, Husbeck B, Feldman D, Knox SJ. Selenite treatment inhibits LAPC-4 tumor growth and prostate-specific antigen secretion in a xenograft model of human prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:935–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee SO, Yeon Chun J, Nadiminty N, Trump DL, Ip C, Dong Y, Gao AC. Monomethylated selenium inhibits growth of LNCaP human prostate cancer xenograft accompanied by a decrease in the expression of androgen receptor and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Prostate. 2006;66:1070–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McCormick DL, Rao KV. Chemoprevention of hormone-dependent prostate cancer in the Wistar-Unilever rat. Eur Urol. 1999;35:464–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chan R, Lok K, Woo J. Prostate cancer and vegetable consumption. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009;53:201–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jian L. Soy, isoflavones, and prostate cancer. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009;53:217–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Messina M, Kucuk O, Lampe JW. An overview of the health effects of isoflavones with an emphasis on prostate cancer risk and prostate-specific antigen levels. J AOAC Int. 2006;89:1121–34 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mori M, Masumori N, Fukuta F, Nagata Y, Sonoda T, Sakauchi F, Ohnishi H, Nojima M, Tsukamoto T. Traditional Japanese diet and prostate cancer. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009;53:191–200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Steiner C, Arnould S, Scalbert A, Manach C. Isoflavones and the prevention of breast and prostate cancer: new perspectives opened by nutrigenomics. Br J Nutr. 2008;99 E Suppl 1:ES78–108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hsu A, Bruno RS, Lohr CV, Taylor AW, Dashwood RH, Bray TM, Ho E. Dietary soy and tea mitigate chronic inflammation and prostate cancer via NFkappaB pathway in the Noble rat model. J Nutr Biochem. 2011;22:502–10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pollard M, Suckow MA. Dietary prevention of hormone refractory prostate cancer in Lobund-Wistar rats: a review of studies in a relevant animal model. Comp Med. 2006;56:461–7 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Taylor CK, Levy RM, Elliott JC, Burnett BP. The effect of genistein aglycone on cancer and cancer risk: a review of in vitro, preclinical, and clinical studies. Nutr Rev. 2009;67:398–415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang J, Eltoum IE, Carpenter M, Lamartiniere CA. Genistein mechanisms and timing of prostate cancer chemoprevention in Lobund-Wistar rats. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10:143–50 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Thigpen JE, Setchell KD, Ahlmark KB, Locklear J, Spahr T, Caviness GF, Goelz MF, Haseman JK, Newbold RR, Forsythe DB. Phytoestrogen content of purified, open- and closed-formula laboratory animal diets. Lab Anim Sci. 1999;49:530–6 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jensen MN, Ritskes-Hoitinga M. How isoflavone levels in common rodent diets can interfere with the value of animal models and with experimental results. Lab Anim. 2007;41:1–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brown NM, Setchell KD. Animal models impacted by phytoestrogens in commercial chow: implications for pathways influenced by hormones. Lab Invest. 2001;81:735–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Legg RL, Tolman JR, Lovinger CT, Lephart ED, Setchell KD, Christensen MJ. Diets high in selenium and isoflavones decrease androgen-regulated gene expression in healthy rat dorsolateral prostate. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2008;6:57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tolman JR, Lephart ED, Setchell KD, Eggett DL, Christensen MJ. Timing of supplementation of selenium and isoflavones determines prostate cancer risk factor reduction in rats. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2008;5:31–40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lu J, Holmgren A. Selenoproteins. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:723–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Reeves MA, Hoffmann PR. The human selenoproteome: recent insights into functions and regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:2457–78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bu L, Setchell KDR, Lephart ED. Influences of dietary soy isoflavones on metabolism but not nociception and stress hormone responses in ovariectomized female rats. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005;3:58–65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lephart ED, Setchell KDR, Handa RJ, Lund TD. Behavioral effects of endocrine-disrupting substances: phytoestrogens. ILAR J. 2004;45:443–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rachón D, Vortherms T, Seidlova-Wuttke D, Wuttke W. Effects of dietary equol on body weight gain, intra-abdominal fat accumulation, plasma lipids, and glucose tolerance in ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats. Menopause. 2007;14:925–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Velasquez MT, Bhathena SJ. Role of dietary soy protein in obesity. Int J Med Sci. 2007;4:72–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Coligan JE, Bierer BE, Margulies DH, Shevach EM, Strober W. Current protocols in immunology. Chapter 20, Unit 20.5. New York: Greene Pub. Associates and Wiley-Interscience; 2001 [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Greenberg NM, DeMayo F, Finegold MJ, Medina D, Tilley WD, Aspinall JO, Cunha GR, Donjacour AA, Matusik RJ, Rosen JM. Prostate cancer in a transgenic mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:3439–43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Greenberg NM, DeMayo FJ, Sheppard PC, Barrios R, Lebovitz R, Finegold M, Angelopoulou R, Dodd JG, Duckworth ML, Rosen JM, et al. The rat probasin gene promoter directs hormonally and developmentally regulated expression of a heterologous gene specifically to the prostate in transgenic mice. Mol Endocrinol. 1994;8:230–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cederroth CR, Vinciguerra M, Kuhne F, Madani R, Doerge DR, Visser TJ, Foti M, Rohner-Jeanrenaud F, Vassalli JD, Nef S. A phytoestrogen-rich diet increases energy expenditure and decreases adiposity in mice. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1467–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cederroth CR, Vinciguerra M, Gjinovci A, Kuhne F, Klein M, Cederroth M, Caille D, Suter M, Neumann D, James RW, et al. Dietary phytoestrogens activate AMP-activated protein kinase with improvement in lipid and glucose metabolism. Diabetes. 2008;57:1176–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cederroth CR, Nef S. Fetal programming of adult glucose homeostasis in mice. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cederroth CR, Zimmermann C, Beny JL, Schaad O, Combepine C, Descombes P, Doerge DR, Pralong FP, Vassalli JD, Nef S. Potential detrimental effects of a phytoestrogen-rich diet on male fertility in mice. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;321:152–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Blake C, Fabick KM, Setchell KD, Lund TD, Lephart ED. Neuromodulation by soy diets or equol: anti-depressive & anti-obesity-like influences, age- & hormone-dependent effects. BMC Neurosci. 2011;12:28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bu L, Lephart ED. Soy isoflavones modulate the expression of BAD and neuron-specific beta III tubulin in male rat brain. Neurosci Lett. 2005;385:153–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lund TD, Rhees RW, Setchell KD, Lephart ED. Altered sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area (SDN-POA) volume in adult Long-Evans rats by dietary soy phytoestrogens. Brain Res. 2001;914:92–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Reeves PG, Nielsen FH, Fahey GC., Jr AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J Nutr. 1993;123:1939–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Suzuki KT, Tsuji Y, Ohta Y, Suzuki N. Preferential organ distribution of methylselenol source Se-methylselenocysteine relative to methylseleninic acid. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008;227:76–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Christensen MJ, Cammack PM, Wray CD. Tissue specificity of selenoprotein gene expression in rats. J Nutr Biochem. 1995;6:367–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Christensen MJ, Bown JW, Lei LI. The effect of income on selenium intake and status in Utah County, Utah. J Am Coll Nutr. 1988;7:155–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.de Kok JB, Roelofs RW, Giesendorf BA, Pennings JL, Waas ET, Feuth T, Swinkels DW, Span PN. Normalization of gene expression measurements in tumor tissues: comparison of 13 endogenous control genes. Lab Invest. 2005;85:154–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wycherly BJ, Moak MA, Christensen MJ. High dietary intake of sodium selenite induces oxidative DNA damage in rat liver. Nutr Cancer. 2004;48:78–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Christensen MJ, Nartey ET, Hada AL, Legg RL, Barzee BR. High selenium reduces NF-kappaB-regulated gene expression in uninduced human prostate cancer cells. Nutr Cancer. 2007;58:197–204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.National Center for Biotechnology Information Primer-BLAST. 2011. [cited 2011 Jan 21]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=nuccore&cmd
  • 58.Sunde RA, Raines AM, Barnes KM, Evenson JK. Selenium status highly regulates selenoprotein mRNA levels for only a subset of the selenoproteins in the selenoproteome. Biosci Rep. 2009;29:329–38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cederroth CR, Nef S. Soy, phytoestrogens and metabolism: a review. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;304:30–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lephart ED, Porter JP, Lund TD, Bu L, Setchell KD, Ramoz G, Crowley WR. Dietary isoflavones alter regulatory behaviors, metabolic hormones and neuroendocrine function in Long-Evans male rats. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2004;1:16–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ørgaard A, Jensen L. The effects of soy isoflavones on obesity. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2008;233:1066–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.deVere White RW, Hackman RM, Soares SE, Beckett LA, Li Y, Sun B. Effects of a genistein-rich extract on PSA levels in men with a history of prostate cancer. Urology. 2004;63:259–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fischer L, Mahoney C, Jeffcoat AR, Koch MA, Thomas BE, Valentine JL, Stinchcombe T, Boan J, Crowell JA, Zeisel SH. Clinical characteristics and pharmacokinetics of purified soy isoflavones: multiple-dose administration to men with prostate neoplasia. Nutr Cancer. 2004;48:160–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mentor-Marcel R, Lamartiniere CA, Eltoum IE, Greenberg NM, Elgavish A. Genistein in the diet reduces the incidence of poorly differentiated prostatic adenocarcinoma in transgenic mice (TRAMP). Cancer Res. 2001;61:6777–82 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kim H, Hall P, Smith M, Kirk M, Prasain JK, Barnes S, Grubbs C. Chemoprevention by grape seed extract and genistein in carcinogen-induced mammary cancer in rats is diet dependent. J Nutr. 2004;134:S3445–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hernández-Ledesma B, Hsieh CC, de Lumen BO. Lunasin, a novel seed peptide for cancer prevention. Peptides. 2009;30:426–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pusztai A, Bardocz S, Ewen SW. Uses of plant lectins in bioscience and biomedicine. Front Biosci. 2008;13:1130–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ju J, Picinich SC, Yang Z, Zhao Y, Suh N, Kong AN, Yang CS. Cancer-preventive activities of tocopherols and tocotrienols. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:533–42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bu L, Lephart ED. Regulatory behavior and skin temperature in mid-aged male rats on three different isoflavone-containing diets. J Med Food. 2006;9:567–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ferreira AC, Lisboa PC, Oliveira KJ, Lima LP, Barros IA, Carvalho DP. Inhibition of thyroid type 1 deiodinase activity by flavonoids. Food Chem Toxicol. 2002;40:913–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Panda S, Kar A, Patil S. Soy sterols in the regulation of thyroid functions, glucose homeostasis and hepatic lipid peroxidation in mice. Food Res Int. 2009;42:1087–92 [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Thakur MK, Sharma PK. Aging of brain: role of estrogen. Neurochem Res. 2006;31:1389–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Online Supporting Material

Articles from The Journal of Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition

RESOURCES