Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Demography. 2011 Nov;48(4):1263–1292. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0062-z

Table 3.

Multilevel models of the black-white difference in census tract percentage non-Hispanic white: Black and white respondents from the 1981, 1991, and 2001 waves of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (standard errors in parentheses)

Independent Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Intercept 84.833***
(0.764)
88.255***
(0.886)
85.613***
(1.466)
77.752***
(1.404)
Black −36.669***
(2.027)
−41.012***
(2.099)
−36.367***
(2.534)
−42.221***
(2.884)
Fixed Effects on Black-White Difference
 Year 1991 (ref. = 1981) 4.712***
(1.049)
2.868**
(1.066)
5.914**
(2.020)
 Year 2001 (ref. = 1991) 3.377**
(1.098)
2.961**
(1.096)
4.825**
(1.809)
Individual Characteristics
 Age 30–39 (ref. = 18–29) 1.038
(1.201)
0.847
(1.189)
 Age 40–49 (ref. = 18–29) −0.707
(1.381)
−0.787
(1.368)
 Age 50–59 (ref. = 18–29) −4.903**
(1.587)
−5.154**
(1.570)
 Age >60 (ref. = 18–29) −2.308
(1.663)
−3.049
(1.646)
 Female (1 = yes) 0.259
(1.160)
0.254
(1.148)
 Married (1 = yes) 2.173
(1.218)
2.365*
(1.205)
 Number of children −1.049*
(0.466)
−0.963*
(0.460)
 Homeowner (1 = yes) −2.347*
(1.073)
−2.123*
(1.059)
 Persons per room −1.090
(1.427)
−1.577
(1.409)
 Education (in years) 0.593***
(0.163)
0.595 ***
(0.161)
 Family income ($1,000s) 0.092***
(0.015)
0.088***
(0.015)
 Employed (1 = yes) 0.728
(1.194)
0.594
(1.181)
Metropolitan Characteristics
 Population size (ln) −6.431***
(1.801)
 % non-Hispanic black −0.615***
(0.176)
 % Hispanic 0.258
(0.155)
 % Asian −0.159
(0.276)
 % in poverty −0.335
(0.371)
 % of labor force in manufacturing −0.009
(0.235)
 % of labor force in local, state,
  or federal government
0.593*
(0.271)
 % new housing 0.125
(0.115)
 % living in suburban area 0.052
(0.093)
 Municipal fragmentation −13.214
(7.952)
Variance Components
 Level 2: τ00 Random intercept (MSA) 84.96 87.38 87.35 5.82
 Level 2: τ11 Random slope (black) 414.21 398.24 344.02 189.09
 Level 2: τ01 Covariance (intercept, slope) −24.15 −19.50 −23.43 −15.17
 Level 1: σ2 Residual variance 404.88 400.58 381.51 378.01
Pseudo-R2 Level 2 Intercept .00 .00 .93
Pseudo-R2 Level 2 Slope .04 .14 .45
Pseudo-R2 Level 1 Residual .01 .05 .00
Likelihood Ratio Test χ2 (df) 850.11*** (2)a 93.75*** (4) 455.4*** (24) 422.06*** (20)
Log-Likelihood (df) −39,048 (6) −39,001 (10) −38,773 (34) −38,562 (54)
AIC 78,107 78,021 77,614 77,232
BIC 78,150 78,092 77,855 77,614
N 8,767 8,767 8,767 8,767
a

The null model for the likelihood ratio test is a random intercept model only. The two additional degrees of freedom in Model 1 are attributed to a random slope (black, τ11) and the covariance (τ01) between the random intercept and random slope.

p < .10

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001