Abstract
Estrone sulphate, follicle-stimulating hormone, and testosterone levels in male breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors are examined.
Keywords: Male breast cancer, Aromatase inhibitors, Estrone sulphate, Testosterone, Follicle-stimulating hormone
Introduction
The role of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in male breast cancer patients is still unknown.
In preclinical models, administration of these drugs was associated with significant increases in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and testosterone and no change in estradiol (E2) levels [1], whereas in healthy men administration of AIs causes a significant decrease in E2 but an increase in FSH, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone [2]. Recently, Doyen at al. [3] reported on the largest experience of the efficacy of AIs in male breast cancer patients and their impact on E2 levels. In that retrospective analysis, AIs were administered to 15 metastatic patients and showed acceptable activity, with two complete responses (13%), four partial responses (13%), and two cases of disease stabilization (13%). All assessable patients (n = 6) had E2 levels less than the lower limit of the assay during AI treatment.
These results demonstrate that AIs are active in male breast cancer and show a significant reduction in E2 levels. FSH and testosterone levels were not assessed.
Methods
We report two cases of male breast cancer treated with AIs in which we determined, prospectively, estrone sulphate (an estrogen metabolite), testosterone, and FSH levels.
The first patient was a 63-year-old man with metastatic breast cancer. He was diagnosed with a right-side locally advanced ductal invasive carcinoma that was stage cT4 N2 and estrogen and progesterone receptor–positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2− by immunohistochemistry. Instrumental staging revealed multiple lung and thoracic lymph nodes metastases. He received first-line chemotherapy containing anthracycline and taxanes. During that treatment, he developed a pulmonary thromboembolism. For this reason, chemotherapy was stopped and letrozole was begun. Letrozole was interrupted after 3 months as a result of lung disease progression and second-line chemotherapy with vinorelbine was begun.
The second patient was a 64-year-old man diagnosed with early breast cancer. He was treated with a right mastectomy for a stage pT2N1a invasive ductal carcinoma that was estrogen and progesterone receptor–positive and HER-2+ (3+) by immunohistochemistry. He received adjuvant chemotherapy containing anthracyclines and taxanes and began adjuvant trastuzumab. We prescribed adjuvant tamoxifen, but after <1 year, patient developed a detached retina so we switched tamoxifen with anastrozole. The patient is still receiving adjuvant anastrozole.
These two patients received an AI because they developed two clinical conditions (pulmonary thromboembolism and detached retina) for which tamoxifen might not be safe. Estrone sulphate, testosterone, and FSH levels were assessed prospectively in order to add a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog if estrone sulphate reduction was not achieved [4].
Plasma samples were obtained before the beginning of AI treatment and 6 weeks thereafter (i.e., at concentration steady state levels of AIs). FSH and testosterone were evaluated by a commercially available electrochemiluminescence immunoassay on an Elecsys 2010 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Estrone sulphate was evaluated by a commercially available radioimmunoassay kit (DSL-5400; Diagnostic Systems Laboratories Inc., Webster, TX) after a nonchromatographic cleaning of samples from dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate [5]. Activity was measured using a γ scintillation counter (Cobra II Autogamma; Canberra-Packard Central Europe GmbH, Schwadorf, Austria). Plasma estrone sulphate is produced by sulfatation of circulating estrone, and estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulphate levels are in equilibrium [6]. Thus, inhibition of peripheral aromatase causes a similar drop in all three plasma estrogens.
Results
Table 1 shows estrone sulphate, FSH, and testosterone levels at baseline and after 6 weeks of AI treatment.
Table 1.
Estrone sulphate, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone levels at baseline and after 6 weeks of aromatase inhibitor treatment
Assuming that circulating estrogen levels in the male do not change significantly with age [7], basal plasma estrone sulphate concentrations in the two men were similar to data previously reported in the literature [5, 8, 9].
We observed an increase in FSH levels but a marked decrease in estrone sulphate levels in both patients. Testosterone levels increased slightly.
Conclusions
In animals and healthy men, AI treatment leads to an increase in both FSH and testosterone [10]. Because testosterone is the substrate for aromatase in estrogen synthesis, a lower suppression of estrogens by AIs can be achieved in men. On this basis, it was hypothesized that gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs could inhibit the feedback loop to the hypothalamus and pituitary glands, leading to better suppression of estrogen by AIs [4]. However, chronic administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog in men is associated with some undesirable side effects, such as a decrease in libido, impotence, hot flushes, gynecomastia [11], and osteoporosis [12].
Our data confirm that of Mauras et al. [2]. We observed an increase in FSH (from about two- to threefold the basal values) and an increase in circulating testosterone levels of about 20%–30%. Suppression of estrogen synthesis after 6 weeks of AI treatment was high (near 80%) and comparable with that observed in postmenopausal women treated with letrozole [13].
Therefore, the increase in FSH and circulating testosterone levels did not seem to influence AI activity. This could be explained by the fact that estrogen produced by the testes, not susceptible to aromatase inhibition and stimulation by FSH, accounts for only 20% of circulating estrogen [7] and by the high activity of AIs in inhibiting androgen aromatization to estrogens, which counteracts the weak increase in circulating testosterone.
Our biochemical data show high activity of AIs in estrogen suppression in men affected by breast cancer as well, despite the increase in FSH and circulating testosterone levels, and do not support the need for gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs in combination with AIs, as previously suggested [4].
Author Contributions
Conception/Design: Claudia Bighin, Paolo Pronzato, Gianluigi Lunardi
Provision of study material or patients: Claudia Bighin, Gianluigi Lunardi, Paola Marroni, Paola Taveggia, Alessia Levaggi, Sara Giraudi
Collection and/or assembly of data: Claudia Bighin, Gianluigi Lunardi, Paola Marroni, Paola Taveggia, Alessia Levaggi, Sara Giraudi
Data analysis and interpretation: Claudia Bighin, Paolo Pronzato, Gianluigi Lunardi, Lucia Del Mastro
Manuscript writing: Claudia Bighin, Paolo Pronzato, Gianluigi Lunardi, Lucia Del Mastro
Final approval of manuscript: Claudia Bighin, Paolo Pronzato, Gianluigi Lunardi, Lucia Del Mastro, Paola Marroni, Paola Taveggia, Alessia Levaggi, Sara Giraudi
References
- 1.Turner KJ, Morley M, Atanassova N, et al. Effect of chronic administration of an aromatase inhibitor to adult male rats on pituitary and testicular function and fertility. J Endocrinol. 2000;164:225–238. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1640225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mauras N, O'Brien KO, Klein KO, et al. Estrogen suppression in males: Metabolic effects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:2370–2377. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.7.6676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Doyen J, Italiano A, Largillier R, et al. Aromatase inhibition in male breast cancer patients: biological and clinical implications. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1243–1245. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Giordano SH, Hortobagyi GN. Leuprolide acetate plus aromatase inhibition for male breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:e42–e43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.2397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brind JL, Chervinsky K, Völgelman JH, et al. Radioimmunoassay of estrone sulfate in the serum of normal men after a non-chromatographic procedure that eliminates interference from dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate. Steroids. 1990;55:32–35. doi: 10.1016/0039-128x(90)90071-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lønning PE, Johannessen DC, Thorsen T. Alteration in the production rate and the metabolism of oestrone and oestrone sulphate in breast cancer patients treated with aminoglutethimide. Br J Cancer. 1989;60:107–111. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gray A, Feldman HA, McKinlay JB, et al. Age, disease, and changing sex hormone levels in middle aged men: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73:1016–1025. doi: 10.1210/jcem-73-5-1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Franz C, Watson D, Longcope C. Estrone sulfate and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations in normal subjects and men with cirrhosis. Steroids. 1979;34:563–573. doi: 10.1016/s0039-128x(79)80017-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Loriaux DL, Ruder HJ, Lipsett MB. The measurement of estrone sulfate in plasma. Steroids. 1971;18:463–472. doi: 10.1016/0039-128x(71)90059-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nahleh ZA. Hormonal therapy for male breast cancer: A different approach for a different disease. Cancer Treat Rev. 2006;32:101–105. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2005.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kaisary AL, Tyrrell CJ, Peeling WB, et al. Comparison of LHRH analogue (Zoladex) with orchiectomy in patients with metastatic prostatic carcinoma. Br J Urol. 1991;67:502–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15195.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Daniell HW, Dunn SR, Ferguson DW, et al. Progressive osteoporosis during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2000;163:181–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lunardi G., Del Mastro L., Serra M., et al. Plasma levels of estrone sulphate (ES) in postmenopausal women with breast cancer (BC) during letrozole (L) treatment: Association with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP19A1. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15 suppl):555. [Google Scholar]

