Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2011;21(2):143–153. doi: 10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v21.i2.40

Molecular parameters of head and neck cancer metastasis

Sanjay L Bhave 1, Theodoros N Teknos 1, Quintin Pan 1, Arthur G James 2, Richard J Solove 3
PMCID: PMC3228366  NIHMSID: NIHMS325624  PMID: 22077153

Abstract

Metastasis remains a major cause of mortality in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). HNSCC patients with metastatic disease have extremely poor prognosis with survival rate of less than a year. Metastasis is an intricate sequential process which requires a discrete population of tumor cells to possess the capacity to intravasate from the primary tumor into systemic circulation, survive in circulation, extravasate at a distant site, and proliferate in a foreign hostile environment. Literature has accumulated to provide mechanistic insight into several signal transduction pathways, receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3), Rho GTPases, protein kinase Cε (PKCε), and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), that are involved in mediating a metastatic tumor cell phenotype in HNSCC. Here we highlight accrued information regarding the key molecular parameters of HNSCC metastasis.

Keywords: HNSCC, squamous cell carcinoma, migration, invasion

I. Introduction

Approximately 600,000 new cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are diagnosed worldwide each year.1-3 In the United States, it is estimated that HNSCC will account for 45,660 new cases and 11,210 deaths in 2007.4 HNSCC is divided into three general clinical categories; early-stage disease (Stage I/II), locally advanced disease (Stages III/IV), and recurrent/metastatic disease. Curative treatment is often achieved in patients presented with early-stage disease through surgery or radiation. Palliative chemotherapy is the standard approach for patients with recurrent/metastatic disease. The majority, greater than two-thirds, of HNSCC patients present with locally advanced disease that requires a modern multi-disciplinary approach involving surgery, radiation, and pharmacotherapy. A majority of patients with locally advanced HNSCC treated with chemoradiation or surgery have initial locoregional control but will eventually develop recurrence and/or metastasis. In fact, distant metastasis is more prevalent now due to better locoregional control with multi-modality treatment regimens. Unfortunately, limited therapeutic options are available for HNSCC patients with recurrent/metastatic disease. Palliative chemotherapy is effective in only about one-third of these patients. Patients that do not respond to palliative chemotherapy or progress during palliative chemotherapy have no effective recourse. The median overall survival for HNSCC patients with recurrent/metastatic disease is a dismal 5 to 9 months.5, 6 Thus, there is a critical need to understand the genetic determinants of metastatic HNSCC to allow for better clinical management.

Metastasis is an intricate process involving a cadre of genes resulting in reprogramming of a discrete population of tumor cells within the primary tumor. Metastatic tumor cells must possess the capacity to intravasate from the primary tumor into systemic circulation, survive in circulation, extravasate at a distant site, and proliferate in a foreign hostile environment. Numerous cellular processes, including apoptosis, invasion, and migration, are required to be co-opted by metastatic tumor cells in order to successfully establish metastatic disease. Receptor tyrosine kinases, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), TrkB and c-Met, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3), Rho GTPases, protein kinase Cε (PKCε), and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) are implicated to modulate different aspects of cellular events necessary to induce metastasis in HNSCC. This review highlights published work on the role of these key genes in driving a metastatic tumor cell phenotype in HNSCC. Understanding the molecular parameters of metastatic HNSCC will be necessary to improve on the detection and treatment approaches for aggressive HNSCC.

II. Receptor tyrosine kinases

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a member of the ErbB/Her family of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) which also includes Her2, Her3 and Her4. The epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factorα (TGFα) are the main ligands which bind to EGFR. Ligand binding induces a conformational change causing EGFR to homodimerize or heterodimerize with other members of the Her family leading to autophosphorylation and activation of the intrinsic tyrosine kinase to initiate downstream signaling. EGFR have been reported to activate ras-mitogen activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK), phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt, c-Src, Stat3, c-Met, and phospholipase Cγ-1 (PLCγ-1).7-11

A recent report demonstrated that EGF induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) transition in SCC10A cells with a decrease in E-cadherin levels and an increase in N-cadherin and vimentin levels.12 SCC10A cells were highly invasive and motile in response to EGF treatment. Additionally, over-expression of E-cadherin was sufficient to blunt EGF-mediated cell invasion and migration. EGFR also has been demonstrated to prevent anoikis, programmed cell death of non-attached cells, in HNSCC cells. Upon detachment from the extracellular matrix, contact with neighboring HNSCC cells activates an EGFR-E-cadherin complex which activates ERK and increased the levels of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl2.13 EGFR contributes to a metastatic HNSCC tumor cell phenotype through regulation of invasion, migration, and anoikis. EGFR has been reported to modulate cell invasion through activation of PLCγ-1 and c-Src.9, 14 EGF stimulation resulted in an increase in PLCγ-1 phosphorylation and activity in HNSCC cell lines.9 Pharmacological inhibition of EGFR blunted EGF-stimulated PLCγ-1 activation. Moreover, cell invasion was impaired in HNSCC treated with PLCγ-1 antisense. HNSCC treated with EGF enhanced the binding interaction between c-Src and EGFR.15 It was shown that gefitinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, suppressed c-Src activation and invasion in HNSCC.16 Over-expression of constitutive active c-Src enhanced cell invasion in 1483 HNSCC cells.17 Additionally, inhibition of c-Src and EGFR, using small molecule inhibitors, AZD0530 and gefitinib, dramatically blunted invasion in PCI-37B and 1483 cells.17 Lastly, combined inhibition of PLCγ-1 and c-Src further attenuated cell invasion in HNSCC cells.18

EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII) is the most common truncated form of EGFR. EGFRvIII has an in-frame deletion of exons 2 to 7 resulting in a truncated extracellular domain.19, 20 This deletion alters the conformation of EGFR resulting in a ligand-independent, constitutively active EGFR. EGFRvIII has been reported to be expressed in 40% of HNSCC tumors and has been linked to tumorigenesis and metastasis.21 Expression of EGFRvIII in wildtype EGFR expressing HNSCC cells enhances cell proliferation, migration, invasion and in vivo tumor growth.22 Tumor xenografts from EGFRvIII over-expressing cells were reported to have higher levels of phosphorylated Stat3 as compared to empty vector control cells.22 Wildtype EGFR expressing cells were sensitive to cetuximab, a humanized anti-EGFR antibody, but cells expressing EGFRvIII were not affected by cetuximab treatment.22 Furthermore, expression of EGFRvIII was sufficient to transform and enhance the motility of normal mouse fibroblasts.23

c-Met, a RTK, is over-expressed in HNSCC and involved in enhancing proliferation, motility and invasion. The hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is the ligand for c-Met.24 Binding of HGF activates c-Met resulting in phosphorylation of PI3K/Akt and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) and activation of Stat3.25, 26 High serum levels of HGF were reported to be associated with resistance to chemoradiation and poorer survival.27 Activation of c-Met by HGF results in signaling leading to tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis.28 Primary HNSCC tumors were shown to have elevated levels of HGF and c-Met in comparison to adjacent normal epithelium.29 In addition, HNSCC patients with low c-Met and HGF in the primary tumor have better overall prognosis.29 HNSCC cells treated with an anti-HGF antibody had impaired cell invasion and migration.29 Moreover, amplification or mutation of c-Met enhance migration and metastasis in HNSCC.30

Another RTK, TrkB, was reported to be expressed in more than 50% of HNSCC tumor along with its ligand, brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).31 Stimulation of TrkB by BDNF enhanced invasion and migration of HNSCC cells.31 Targeted suppression of TrkB in OSC19 HNSCC cells inhibited invasion and migration.31 Forced expression of TrkB altered the expression of EMT markers in Tu138 HNSCC cells; E-cadherin levels were reduced and Twist levels were elevated.31 Additionally, tumor growth was retarded in TrkB-deficient OSC19 HNSCC cells in nude mice.31

III. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) belongs to a family of transcription factors involved in cytokine signaling. Stat3 is activated through sequential phosphorylation of tyrosine 705 and serine 727 in response to various external stimuli. Receptor tyrosine kinases, EGFR and c-Met, phosphorylate Stat3 upon ligand binding.25, 26, 32, 33 The binding of interleukin-6 (IL-6) to the gp130 receptor triggers Stat3 phosphorylation by JAK2.34 Moreover, Stat3 was demonstrated to be a target of the c-Src non-receptor tyrosine kinase.15 Upon activation, Stat3 homodimerizes and translocates to the nucleus to bind to specific DNA response elements to regulate gene expression.35

Stat3 was reported to be elevated and constitutively activated in HNSCC.33, 36 Ectopic expression of constitutive active Stat3 in UMSCC22B, a HNSCC cell line with low endogenous active Stat3 levels, enhanced proliferation and tumorigenicity compared to control transfected cells.37 UMSCC22B cells over-expressed with constitutive active Stat3 were shown to have elevated levels of cyclin D1 and Bcl-XL, two recognized Stat3-dependent genes.37 These results demonstrate that constitutively active Stat3 has the capacity to promote HNSCC tumorigenesis in an EGFR-independent manner. In support, targeted suppression of Stat3 with a Stat3 decoy, a 15-mer double-stranded oligonucleotide to mimic the Stat3 response element, inhibited Stat3-mediated transcription and cell proliferation in HNSCC cells, PCI-37a and 1483.38 These results provide evidence that Stat3 modulates cell proliferation and survival in HNSCC.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated HNSCC is highly metastatic and has elevated Stat3 activation.39 In fact, Stat3 phosphorylation was detected in 70-75% of EBV-associated primary HNSCC tumors.39-41 A recent study demonstrated that EBV-induced Stat3 activation is directly responsible for promoting an invasive phenotype in HNSCC.40 EBV-infected HONE-1 cells were shown to have elevated phosphorylated Stat3 at tyrosine 705 and a dramatic 11-fold increase in cell invasion compared to parental HONE-1 cells.40 In addition, genetic ablation of Stat3 was sufficient to inhibit invasion in EBV-infected HONE-1 cells.40 In a follow-up study, CNE-2 and HK1-LMP cells, two HNSCC cell lines with high levels of Stat3 activation, treated with cucurbitacin I, a JAK/STAT inhibitor, have impaired clonogenic survival and cell invasion and heightened sensitivity to anoikis.42

IV. Rho GTPases

Rho GTPases constitute a sub-family of the ras-superfamily of GTP-binding proteins. The Rho GTPase family is further subdivided into six different groups with the following members: Rho (RhoA, RhoB, and RhoC), Rac (RhoG and Rac1-3), Cdc42 (cdc42Hs, G25K, TC10), Rnd (Rho6, Rho7, and RhoE), RhoD and TTF.43 Each Rho GTPase member is presumed to play a specific role in controlling cytoskeletal reorganization, membrane ruffling, cell motility, cell invasion, cellular proliferation, cell trafficking, and certain aspects of p53-independent/Bcl2-dependent apoptosis.43-47 Rho proteins are involved in actin stress fiber and focal adhesion contact formation.48 Rac and Cdc42 are primarily involved in the formation of lamellipodia and filipodia, respectively.48

Rho GTPases acts as an on-off switch (whether it is bound to GTP or GDP, respectively), capable of activating a large number of downstream Rho effectors. The Rho effectors are divided into three classes according to sequence homology: class I (protein kinase N (PKN), rhotekin, and rhophillin), class II (represented by Rho-kinase/ROK/ROCK), and class III (represented by citron).47, 49-51 Specific downstream effector binding domains in the Rho GTPase protein are responsible for the activation of the different classes of targets.52 Through interactions with the different downstream effectors which lead to interactions with other signaling “hib” proteins such as LIM kinase or adducin, Rho GTPases can exert a variety of effects on the cell.49, 53

The literature on the role Rho GTPases in HNSCC is beginning to accumulate. RhoA, Rac2, and Cdc42 were found to be elevated in premalignant dysplastic and HNSCC cell lines in comparison to normal keratinocytes.54 Furthermore, based on their immunohistochemistry analyses, RhoA was suggested to be a promising biomarker of malignancy and/or aggressiveness in HNSCC.54 In support, hyaluronan (HA)-CD44-dependent cell migration is mediated thorough RhoA in HSC-3 HNSCC cells.55 HA-mediated activation of RhoA enhanced phospholipase Cε activity resulting in phosphorylation of filamin through calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII).55 Phosphorylated filamin has lowered capacity to crosslink F-actin leading to an increase in tumor cell migration.55 Our group demonstrated that RhoC is over-expressed in Stage III and Stage IV regionally metastatic HNSCC compared to Stage I and II localized HNSCC.56 Additionally, elevated RhoC was shown to be associated with advanced clinical stage and lymph node metastases in this cohort of previously untreated HNSCC patients.56 Recent work from our laboratory showed that genetic ablation of RhoC in HNSCC cells, UMSCC1 and UMSCC11A, is sufficient to dampen cell invasion and migration in vitro.57 Moreover, the metastatic potential of RhoC-deficient UMSCC11A cells were severely compromised in NOD/SCID mice.57

Two independent studies demonstrate that Cdc42 activation is critical for galectin-1 (Gal-1)- and CCL19-chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7)-mediated cell invasion in HNSCC cells. Gal-1, a β-galactose binding lectin, was shown to be elevated in primary HNSCC tumors with positive lymph nodes compared to primary HNSCC tumors without nodal disease.58 Over-expression of Gal-1 in OC-2, a minimally invasive HNSCC cell line with low Gal-1 levels, enhanced Cdc42 activation resulting in an increase in cell invasion in vitro and lung metastasis in nude mice.59 CCL19, a ligand for CCR7, stimulation of HNSCC cells enhanced cell invasion and migration through Cdc42 activation. Cdc42 was shown to be localized at the leading edge of migrating tumor cells. In addition, siRNA-mediated knockdown of Cdc42 is sufficient to blunt CCL19-induced cell invasion and migration.

There is also evidence to support the importance of Rac1 in mediating metastasis in HNSCC. Rac1 was shown to be active in a majority of HNSCC cell lines while RhoA and Cdc42 activation was restricted to a selective number of HNSCC cell lines.60 HNSCC cell lines with enhanced Rac1 activation were associated with a highly invasive and motile tumor cell phenotype.60 Constitutive Rac1 activation was demonstrated to be a result of EGFR phosphorylation and activation of Vav2, a Rac1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF).60 Thus, there is evidence that the EGFR-Vav2-Rac1 signaling axis is critical for driving a metastatic phenotype in HNSCC.60 In addition, Rac1 was reported to be required for integrin-mediated cell invasion and migration in HNSCC. Epidermal growth factor receptor pathway substrate 8 (Eps8) facilitates cell migration by regulating F-actin and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activity.61, 62 Elevated Eps8 levels were shown to be associated with positive nodal disease in HNSCC.63 Genetic ablation of Eps8 suppressed integrin-mediated cell migration.63 Recapitulation of active Rac1 was sufficient to rescue the cell migration defect of Eps8-deficient HNSCC cells.63 Lastly, Rac1 also was demonstrated to be critical for integrin-mediated cell invasion in HNSCC.64

V. Protein kinase Cε

Protein kinase C (PKC) is a family of serine/threonine kinases known to play critical roles in the signal transduction pathways involved in proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and migration.65-67 Ten different PKC isoforms have been identified and are divided into three groups according to their structure and activation requirements. The classical isoforms, α, βI, βII, and γ, have intact C1 diacylglycerol/phorbol ester binding domain and C2 calcium binding domain and thus, require phospholipids and calcium for activation. The novel isoforms, δ, ε, ζ, and η, are calcium-independent and the atypical isoforms, θ, and ι/λ, can be activated in the absence of diacyglycerol and calcium.

In primary HNSCC tumors, PKCα, β, γ, ε, and ζ levels were shown to be elevated but only PKCε was found to be a prognostic biomarker, even better than the traditional gold standard of TNM staging.68 This prospective study indicated that elevated PKCε is significantly associated with an increase in disease recurrence and a decrease in overall survival.68 Our laboratory demonstrated that PKCε is elevated in HNSCC and promotes an invasive and motile tumor cell phenotype.69 RNAi-mediated knockdown of PKCε in UMSCC11 and UMSCC36, two HNSCC cell lines with elevated endogenous PKCε levels, is sufficient to significantly impair cell invasion and migration.69 Moreover, reconstitution of constitutive active RhoA or RhoC in PKCε-deficient HNSCC cells is sufficient to rescue the loss-of-function migration defect providing direct evidence that RhoA and RhoC is downstream of the PKCε signaling cascade.69 In addition to regulation of Rho GTPases, PKCε was reported to directly phosphorylate and activate Akt and Stat3. PKCε phosphorylates Akt at serine 473 and Stat3 at serine 727 leading to their full activation/functional state.70-72 There is emerging evidence that Akt phosphorylates RhoC to enhance RhoC activation.73 ROK, a downstream Rho effector, phosphorylates Stat3 resulting in an increase in Stat3 nuclear translocation.74 In addition, PKCε has been reported to be involved in HGF-c-Met signaling in HNSCC.75, 76 Based on these observations, the PKCε signaling network comprises of several highly interconnected signaling nodes, Rho GTPases, Akt, Stat3, and c-Met, to modulate cell invasion, migration, and survival in HNSCC cells.77

VI. Nuclear factor-κB

NF-κB is a transcription factor which functions as a master regulator of genes involved in numerous cellular processes, including inflammation, immune response, cell proliferation, apoptosis and invasion. The process of inflammation is postulated to be a trigger for oncogenesis and NF-κB has been identified as the link to connect chronic inflammation to cancer development. HNSCC tumors and cell lines was reported to have constitutive NF-κB activation resulting in a global increase in pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8).78, 79 Increased nuclear localization of NF-κB is associated with poor prognosis in HNSCC patients.80, 81 Moreover, NF-κB also has been reported to play a role in the development of resistance to chemotherapeutics in HNSCC.82, 83 Several lines of evidence exist to indicate that NF-κB is involved in HNSCC metastasis. Nuclear NF-κB staining was detected in 52% of primary HNSCC tumors with positive nodes compared to only 23% of primary HNSCC tumors without positive nodes.84 Pharmacological blockade of NF-κB blunted cell migration in highly metastatic Tb and TL HNSCC cell lines.84 Moreover, lung and lymph node metastasis of TL cells in two animal models was severely suppressed with a selective NF-κB inhibitor, pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate.84 Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), a validated NF-κB-regulated gene, is intimately involved in metastasis in part through modulation of extracellular matrix proteolysis and cytoskeleton rearrangement. Elevated uPA levels were associated with an invasive phenotype in HNSCC cell lines.85 In direct support, increased uPA expression in primary HNSCC tumors was demonstrated to be predictive of positive lymph nodes.86 Moreover, elevated uPA levels correlated with tumor relapse in HNSCC.87

There is evidence that NF-κB regulates Stat3 activation through control of IL-6. Activation of the gp130 receptor with IL-6 leads to JAK2-mediated phosphorylation of Stat3 at tyrosine 705 in an EGFR-independent manner.34 HNSCC cells, HN13 and HN30, were shown to express high levels of IL-6 through NF-κB-dependent transcriptional activation.88 Genetic inhibition of NF-κB reduced IL-6 levels resulting in a decreased in Stat3 phosphorylation and activation in HNSCC cells.88 Moreover, immunohistochemistry analysis of primary HNSCC tumors showed a correlation between NF-κB, IL-6, and phosphorylated Stat3.88

VII. Summary

HNSCC patients with metastatic disease have limited treatment options and are often offered palliative care. A critical need exists to better understand the genetic alterations which facilitate cellular processes required for metastasis, including invasion, migration, and survival. Acquisition of a metastatic tumor cell phenotype is a complex process and may require the coordinated effort of numerous signal transduction pathways. There is accumulated literature to demonstrate that RTKs, Stat3, Rho GTPases, PKCε, and NF-κB play critical roles to promote metastasis in HNSCC. These five key signaling cascades are highly interconnected in HNSCC suggesting that crosstalk may be necessary to efficiently reprogram a tumor cell to acquire the potential to drive metastatic disease. A system biology approach is necessary to begin to understand the minimal genetic alterations required to promote a metastatic tumor cell phenotype in HNSCC. Detailed understanding of the global metastasis signaling network, including temporal and intensity dynamics, is essential in order to identify critical integration points in the signaling cascade to optimize therapeutic efficacy and minimize adverse effects. This approach will lead to the development of novel anti-cancer therapeutics and hopefully improve the prognosis of HNSCC patients with metastatic disease.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Regulation of Metastasis in HNSCC.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (R01CA135096); American Cancer Society (RSG0821901); The Michelle Theado Memorial Grant from the Joan Bisesi Fund for Head and Neck Oncology Research; and Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Contributor Information

Arthur G. James, Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210

Richard J. Solove, Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210

References

  • 1.Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 10;24(14):2137–50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):74–108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stewart BW, Kleihues P. World cancer report. IARC Press; Lyon: 2003. International agency for research on cancer. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Mar-Apr;58(2):71–96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cohen EE, Lingen MW, Vokes EE. The expanding role of systemic therapy in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 1;22(9):1743–52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lu C, Kies M. Systemic therapy for recurrent and metastatic disease. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia, PA: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Scaltriti M, Baselga J. The epidermal growth factor receptor pathway: a model for targeted therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Sep 15;12(18):5268–72. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leeman RJ, Lui VW, Grandis JR. STAT3 as a therapeutic target in head and neck cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2006 Mar;6(3):231–41. doi: 10.1517/14712598.6.3.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thomas SM, Coppelli FM, Wells A, Gooding WE, Song J, Kassis J, Drenning SD, Grandis JR. Epidermal growth factor receptor-stimulated activation of phospholipase Cgamma-1 promotes invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003 Sep 1;63(17):5629–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schrump DS, Nguyen DM. The epidermal growth factor receptor-STAT pathway in esophageal cancer. Cancer J. 2001 Mar-Apr;7(2):108–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jo M, Stolz DB, Esplen JE, Dorko K, Michalopoulos GK, Strom SC. Cross-talk between epidermal growth factor receptor and c-Met signal pathways in transformed cells. J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8806–11. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.12.8806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zuo JH, Zhu W, Li MY, Li XH, Yi H, Zeng GQ, Wan XX, He QY, Li JH, Qu JQ, Chen Y, Xiao ZQ. Activation of EGFR promotes squamous carcinoma SCC10A cell migration and invasion via inducing EMT-like phenotype change and MMP-9-mediated degradation of E-cadherin. J Cell Biochem. 2011 May 6; doi: 10.1002/jcb.23175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shen X, Kramer RH. Adhesion-mediated squamous cell carcinoma survival through ligand independent activation of epidermal growth factor receptor. Am J Pathol. 2004;165:1315–29. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63390-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang Q, Thomas SM, Xi S, Smithgall TE, Siegfried JM, Kamens J, Gooding WE, Grandis JR. SRC family kinases mediate epidermal growth factor receptor ligand cleavage, proliferation, and invasion of head and neck cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004 Sep 1;64(17):6166–73. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xi S, Zhang Q, Dyer KF, Lerner EC, Smithgall TE, Gooding WE, Kamens J, Grandis JR. Src kinases mediate STAT growth pathways in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Biol Chem. 2003 Aug 22;278(34):31574–83. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303499200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang Z, Bagheri-Yarmand R, Wang RA, Adam L, Papadimitrakopoulou VV, Clayman GL, El-Naggar A, Lotan R, Barnes CJ, Hong WK, Kumar R. The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 (Iressa) suppresses c-Src and Pak1 pathways and invasiveness of human cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Jan 15;10(2):658–67. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-0382-03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Koppikar P, Choi SH, Egloff AM, Cai Q, Suzuki S, Freilino M, Nozawa H, Thomas SM, Gooding WE, Siegfried JM, Grandis JR. Combined inhibition of c-Src and epidermal growth factor receptor abrogates growth and invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jul 1;14(13):4284–91. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nozawa H, Howell G, Suzuki S, Zhang Q, Qi Y, Klein-Seetharaman J, Wells A, Grandis JR, Thomas SM. Combined inhibition of PLC{gamma}-1 and c-Src abrogates epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma invasion. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jul 1;14(13):4336–44. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sugawa N, Ekstrand AJ, James CD, Collins VP. Identical splicing of aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor transcripts from amplified rearranged genes in human glioblastomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:8602–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bigner SH, Humphrey PA, Wong AJ, Vogelstein B, Mark J, Friedman HS, Bigner DD. Characterization of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human glioma cell lines and xenografts. Cancer Res. 1990;50:8017–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sok JC, Coppelli FM, Thomas SM, Lango MN, Xi S, Freilino ML, Graner MW, Wikstrand CJ, Bigner DD, Gooding WE, Furnari FB, Grandis JR. Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII) contributes to head and neck cancer growth and resistance to EGFR targeting. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5064–73. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wheeler SE, Suzuki S, Thomas SM, Sen M, Leeman-Neill RJ, Chiosea SI, Kuan CT, Bigner DD, Gooding WE, Lai SY, Grandis JR. Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III mediates head and neck cancer cell invasion via STAT3 activation. Oncogene. 2010 Sep 16;29(37):5135–45. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pedersen MW, Tkach V, Pedersen N, Berezin V, Poulsen HS. Expression of a naturally occurring constitutively active variant of the epidermal growth factor receptor in mouse fibroblasts increases motility. Int J Cancer. 2004;108(5):643–53. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W, Gherardi E, Vande Woude GF. Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Dec;4(12):915–25. doi: 10.1038/nrm1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Molina JR, Adjei AA. The Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway. J Thorac Oncol. 2006 Jan;1(1):7–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sam MR, Elliott BE, Mueller CR. A novel activating role of SRC and STAT3 on HGF transcription in human breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2007;6:69. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-6-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Allen C, Duffy S, Teknos T, Islam M, Chen Z, Albert PS, Wolf G, Van Waes C. Nuclear factor-kappaB-related serum factors as longitudinal biomarkers of response and survival in advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jun 1;13(11):3182–90. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maulik G, Madhiwala P, Brooks S, Ma PC, Kijima T, Tibaldi EV, Schaefer E, Parmar K, Salgia R. Activated c-Met signals through PI3K with dramatic effects on cytoskeletal functions in small cell lung cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2002 Oct-Dec;6(4):539–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2002.tb00453.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Knowles LM, Stabile LP, Egloff AM, Rothstein ME, Thomas SM, Gubish CT, Lerner EC, Seethala RR, Suzuki S, Quesnelle KM, Morgan S, Ferris RL, Grandis JR, Siegfried JM. HGF and c-Met participate in paracrine tumorigenic pathways in head and neck squamous cell cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jun 1;15(11):3740–50. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Di Renzo MF, Olivero M, Martone T, Maffe A, Maggiora P, Stefani AD, Valente G, Giordano S, Cortesina G, Comoglio PM. Somatic mutations of the MET oncogene are selected during metastatic spread of human HNSC carcinomas. Oncogene. 2000 Mar 16;19(12):1547–55. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kupferman ME, Jiffar T, El-Naggar A, Yilmaz T, Zhou G, Xie T, Feng L, Wang J, Holsinger FC, Yu D, Myers JN. TrkB induces EMT and has a key role in invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 2010 Apr 8;29(14):2047–59. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grandis JR, Drenning SD, Zeng Q, Watkins SC, Melhem MF, Endo S, Johnson DE, Huang L, He Y, Kim JD. Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling abrogates apoptosis in squamous cell carcinogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 11;97(8):4227–32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.8.4227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grandis JR, Drenning SD, Chakraborty A, Zhou MY, Zeng Q, Pitt AS, Tweardy DJ. Requirement of Stat3 but not Stat1 activation for epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated cell growth In vitro. J Clin Invest. 1998 Oct 1;102(7):1385–92. doi: 10.1172/JCI3785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sriuranpong V, Park JI, Amornphimoltham P, Patel V, Nelkin BD, Gutkind JS. Epidermal growth factor receptor-independent constitutive activation of STAT3 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is mediated by the autocrine/paracrine stimulation of the interleukin 6/gp130 cytokine system. Cancer Res. 2003 Jun 1;63(11):2948–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Darnell JE., Jr. STATs and gene regulation. Science. 1997 Sep 12;277(5332):1630–5. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5332.1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shah NG, Trivedi TI, Tankshali RA, Goswami JA, Jetly DH, Kobawala TP, Shukla SN, Shah PM, Verma RJ. Stat3 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma: association with clinicopathological parameters and survival. Int J Biol Markers. 2006 Jul-Sep;21(3):175–83. doi: 10.1177/172460080602100307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kijima T, Niwa H, Steinman RA, Drenning SD, Gooding WE, Wentzel AL, Xi S, Grandis JR. STAT3 activation abrogates growth factor dependence and contributes to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumor growth in vivo. Cell Growth Differ. 2002 Aug;13(8):355–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Leong PL, Andrews GA, Johnson DE, Dyer KF, Xi S, Mai JC, Robbins PD, Gadiparthi S, Burke NA, Watkins SF, Grandis JR. Targeted inhibition of Stat3 with a decoy oligonucleotide abrogates head and neck cancer cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 1;100(7):4138–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0534764100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu YP, Tan YN, Wang ZL, Zeng L, Lu ZX, Li LL, Luo W, Tang M, Cao Y. Phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of STAT3 regulated by the Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Mol Med. 2008 Feb;21(2):153–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lui VW, Wong EY, Ho Y, Hong B, Wong SC, Tao Q, Choi GC, Au TC, Ho K, Yau DM, Ma BB, Hui EP, Chan AS, Tsang CM, Tsao SW, Grandis JR, Chan AT. STAT3 activation contributes directly to Epstein-Barr virus-mediated invasiveness of nasopharyngeal cancer cells in vitro. Int J Cancer. 2009 Oct 15;125(8):1884–93. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Buettner M, Heussinger N, Niedobitek G. Expression of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded latent membrane proteins and STAT3 activation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2006 Nov;449(5):513–9. doi: 10.1007/s00428-006-0294-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lui VW, Yau DM, Wong EY, Ng YK, Lau CP, Ho Y, Chan JP, Hong B, Ho K, Cheung CS, Tsang CM, Tsao SW, Chan AT. Cucurbitacin I elicits anoikis sensitization, inhibits cellular invasion and in vivo tumor formation ability of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis. 2009 Dec;30(12):2085–94. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Aspenstrom P. Effectors for the Rho GTPases. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999 Feb;11(1):95–102. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(99)80011-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Esteve P, Embade N, Perona R, Jimenez B, del Peso L, Leon J, Arends M, Miki T, Lacal JC. Rho-regulated signals induce apoptosis in vitro and in vivo by a p53-independent, but Bcl2 dependent pathway. Oncogene. 1998 Oct 8;17(14):1855–69. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ridley AJ, Paterson HF, Johnston CL, Diekmann D, Hall A. The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. Cell. 1992 Aug 7;70(3):401–10. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90164-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ridley AJ, Hall A. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell. 1992 Aug 7;70(3):389–99. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90163-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kjoller L, Hall A. Signaling to Rho GTPases. Exp Cell Res. 1999 Nov 25;253(1):166–79. doi: 10.1006/excr.1999.4674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nobes CD, Hall A. Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell. 1995 Apr 7;81(1):53–62. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90370-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Maekawa M, Ishizaki T, Boku S, Watanabe N, Fujita A, Iwamatsu A, Obinata T, Ohashi K, Mizuno K, Narumiya S. Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science. 1999 Aug 6;285(5429):895–8. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5429.895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Clark EA, King WG, Brugge JS, Symons M, Hynes RO. Integrin-mediated signals regulated by members of the rho family of GTPases. J Cell Biol. 1998 Jul 27;142(2):573–86. doi: 10.1083/jcb.142.2.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Leung T, Chen XQ, Manser E, Lim L. The p160 RhoA-binding kinase ROK alpha is a member of a kinase family and is involved in the reorganization of the cytoskeleton. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Oct;16(10):5313–27. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.10.5313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fujisawa K, Madaule P, Ishizaki T, Watanabe G, Bito H, Saito Y, Hall A, Narumiya S. Different regions of Rho determine Rho-selective binding of different classes of Rho target molecules. J Biol Chem. 1998 Jul 24;273(30):18943–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.30.18943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fukata Y, Oshiro N, Kinoshita N, Kawano Y, Matsuoka Y, Bennett V, Matsuura Y, Kaibuchi K. Phosphorylation of adducin by Rho-kinase plays a crucial role in cell motility. J Cell Biol. 1999 Apr 19;145(2):347–61. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.2.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Abraham MT, Kuriakose MA, Sacks PG, Yee H, Chiriboga L, Bearer EL, Delacure MD. Motility-related proteins as markers for head and neck squamous cell cancer. Laryngoscope. 2001 Jul;111(7):1285–9. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200107000-00027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bourguignon LY, Gilad E, Brightman A, Diedrich F, Singleton P. Hyaluronan-CD44 interaction with leukemia-associated RhoGEF and epidermal growth factor receptor promotes Rho/Ras co-activation, phospholipase C epsilon-Ca2+ signaling, and cytoskeleton modification in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2006 May 19;281(20):14026–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M507734200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kleer CG, Teknos TN, Islam M, Marcus B, Lee JS, Pan Q, Merajver SD. RhoC GTPase expression as a potential marker of lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Aug 1;12(15):4485–90. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Islam M, Lin G, Brenner JC, Pan Q, Merajver SD, Hou Y, Kumar P, Teknos TN. RhoC expression and head and neck cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer Res. 2009 Nov;7(11):1771–80. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chiang WF, Liu SY, Fang LY, Lin CN, Wu MH, Chen YC, Chen YL, Jin YT. Overexpression of galectin-1 at the tumor invasion front is associated with poor prognosis in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2008 Apr;44(4):325–34. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wu MH, Hong TM, Cheng HW, Pan SH, Liang YR, Hong HC, Chiang WF, Wong TY, Shieh DB, Shiau AL, Jin YT, Chen YL. Galectin-1-mediated tumor invasion and metastasis, up-regulated matrix metalloproteinase expression, and reorganized actin cytoskeletons. Mol Cancer Res. 2009 Mar;7(3):311–8. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Patel V, Rosenfeldt HM, Lyons R, Servitja JM, Bustelo XR, Siroff M, Gutkind JS. Persistent activation of Rac1 in squamous carcinomas of the head and neck: evidence for an EGFR/Vav2 signaling axis involved in cell invasion. Carcinogenesis. 2007 Jun;28(6):1145–52. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgm008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Disanza A, Carlier MF, Stradal TE, Didry D, Frittoli E, Confalonieri S, Croce A, Wehland J, Di Fiore PP, Scita G. Eps8 controls actin-based motility by capping the barbed ends of actin filaments. Nat Cell Biol. 2004 Dec;6(12):1180–8. doi: 10.1038/ncb1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Maa MC, Lee JC, Chen YJ, Lee YC, Wang ST, Huang CC, Chow NH, Leu TH. Eps8 facilitates cellular growth and motility of colon cancer cells by increasing the expression and activity of focal adhesion kinase. J Biol Chem. 2007 Jul 6;282(27):19399–409. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610280200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yap LF, Jenei V, Robinson CM, Moutasim K, Benn TM, Threadgold SP, Lopes V, Wei W, Thomas GJ, Paterson IC. Upregulation of Eps8 in oral squamous cell carcinoma promotes cell migration and invasion through integrin-dependent Rac1 activation. Oncogene. 2009 Jul 9;28(27):2524–34. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nystrom ML, McCulloch D, Weinreb PH, Violette SM, Speight PM, Marshall JF, Hart IR, Thomas GJ. Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition Suppresses {alpha}v{beta}6 Integrin-Dependent Oral Squamous Carcinoma Invasion. Cancer Res. 2006 November 15;66(22):10833–42. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1640. 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gutcher I, Webb PR, Anderson NG. The isoform-specific regulation of apoptosis by protein kinase C. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2003 Jun;60(6):1061–70. doi: 10.1007/s00018-003-2281-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dempsey EC, Newton AC, Mochly-Rosen D, Fields AP, Reyland ME, Insel PA, Messing RO. Protein kinase C isozymes and the regulation of diverse cell responses. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000 Sep;279(3):L429–38. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2000.279.3.L429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jaken S. Protein kinase C isozymes and substrates. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996 Apr;8(2):168–73. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(96)80062-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Martinez-Gimeno C, Diaz-Meco MT, Dominguez I, Moscat J. Alterations in levels of different protein kinase C isotypes and their influence on behavior of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: epsilon PKC, a novel prognostic factor for relapse and survival. Head Neck. 1995 Nov-Dec;17(6):516–25. doi: 10.1002/hed.2880170609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pan Q, Bao LW, Teknos TN, Merajver SD. Targeted disruption of protein kinase C epsilon reduces cell invasion and motility through inactivation of RhoA and RhoC GTPases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 1;66(19):9379–84. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bao L, Gorin MA, Zhang M, Ventura AC, Pomerantz WC, Merajver SD, Teknos TN, Mapp AK, Pan Q. Preclinical development of a bifunctional cancer cell homing, PKCepsilon inhibitory peptide for the treatment of head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 15;69(14):5829–34. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Aziz MH, Manoharan HT, Church DR, Dreckschmidt NE, Zhong W, Oberley TD, Wilding G, Verma AK. Protein kinase Cepsilon interacts with signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 (Stat3), phosphorylates Stat3Ser727, and regulates its constitutive activation in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2007 Sep 15;67(18):8828–38. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhang J, Baines CP, Zong C, Cardwell EM, Wang G, Vondriska TM, Ping P. Functional proteomic analysis of a three-tier PKCepsilon-Akt-eNOS signaling module in cardiac protection. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005 Feb;288(2):H954–61. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00756.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Heather UL, Groh K, Radunsky G, van Golen CM, van Golen KL, editors. Phosphorylation of RhoC GTPase by Akt/protein kinase B is required for breast cancer cell migration and invasion; American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting; Los Angeles, CA. : Philadelphia (PA): AACR. 2007 Apr 14-18.2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Debidda M, Wang L, Zang H, Poli V, Zheng Y. A role of STAT3 in Rho GTPase-regulated cell migration and proliferation. J Biol Chem. 2005 Apr 29;280(17):17275–85. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413187200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Worden B, Yang XP, Lee TL, Bagain L, Yeh NT, Cohen JG, Van Waes C, Chen Z. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor differentially regulates expression of proangiogenic factors through Egr-1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 15;65(16):7071–80. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kermorgant S, Zicha D, Parker PJ. PKC controls HGF-dependent c-Met traffic, signalling and cell migration. EMBO J. 2004 Oct 1;23(19):3721–34. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gorin MA, Pan Q. Protein kinase C epsilon: an oncogene and emerging tumor biomarker. Mol Cancer. 2009;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-8-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ondrey FG, Dong G, Sunwoo J, Chen Z, Wolf JS, Crowl-Bancroft CV, Mukaida N, Van Waes C. Constitutive activation of transcription factors NF-(kappa)B, AP-1, and NF-IL6 in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines that express proinflammatory and pro-angiogenic cytokines. Mol Carcinog. 1999 Oct;26(2):119–29. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2744(199910)26:2<119::aid-mc6>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chen Z, Malhotra PS, Thomas GR, Ondrey FG, Duffey DC, Smith CW, Enamorado I, Yeh NT, Kroog GS, Rudy S, McCullagh L, Mousa S, Quezado M, Herscher LL, Van Waes C. Expression of proinflammatory and proangiogenic cytokines in patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Jun;5(6):1369–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Loercher A, Lee TL, Ricker JL, Howard A, Geoghegen J, Chen Z, Sunwoo JB, Sitcheran R, Chuang EY, Mitchell JB, Baldwin AS, Jr., Van Waes C. Nuclear factor-kappaB is an important modulator of the altered gene expression profile and malignant phenotype in squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2004 Sep 15;64(18):6511–23. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Dong G, Chen Z, Kato T, Van Waes C. The host environment promotes the constitutive activation of nuclear factor-kappaB and proinflammatory cytokine expression during metastatic tumor progression of murine squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1999 Jul 15;59(14):3495–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kato T, Duffey DC, Ondrey FG, Dong G, Chen Z, Cook JA, Mitchell JB, Van Waes C. Cisplatin and radiation sensitivity in human head and neck squamous carcinomas are independently modulated by glutathione and transcription factor NF-kappaB. Head Neck. 2000 Dec;22(8):748–59. doi: 10.1002/1097-0347(200012)22:8<748::aid-hed2>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wang CY, Cusack JC, Jr., Liu R, Baldwin AS., Jr. Control of inducible chemoresistance: enhanced anti-tumor therapy through increased apoptosis by inhibition of NF-kappaB. Nat Med. 1999 Apr;5(4):412–7. doi: 10.1038/7410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yan M, Xu Q, Zhang P, Zhou XJ, Zhang ZY, Chen WT. Correlation of NF-kappaB signal pathway with tumor metastasis of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:437. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Clayman G, Wang SW, Nicolson GL, el-Naggar A, Mazar A, Henkin J, Blasi F, Goepfert H, Boyd DD. Regulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator expression in squamous-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Int J Cancer. 1993 Apr 22;54(1):73–80. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910540113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Nozaki S, Endo Y, Kawashiri S, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E, Yonemura Y, Sasaki T. Immunohistochemical localization of a urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: association with mode of invasion and lymph node metastasis. Oral Oncol. 1998 Jan;34(1):58–62. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(97)00028-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hundsdorfer B, Zeilhofer HF, Bock KP, Dettmar P, Schmitt M, Kolk A, Pautke C, Horch HH. Tumour-associated urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor PAI-1 in normal and neoplastic tissues of patients with squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity - clinical relevance and prognostic value. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005 Jun;33(3):191–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2004.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Squarize CH, Castilho RM, Sriuranpong V, Pinto DS, Jr., Gutkind JS. Molecular cross-talk between the NFkappaB and STAT3 signaling pathways in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Neoplasia. 2006 Sep;8(9):733–46. doi: 10.1593/neo.06274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES