Abstract
Background
MicroRNAs are small molecules which regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally and aberrant expression of several miRNAs is associated with neuroblastoma, a childhood cancer arising from precursor cells of the sympathetic nervous system. Amplification of the MYCN transcription factor characterizes the most clinically aggressive subtype of this disease, and although alteration of p53 signaling is not commonly found in primary tumors, deregulation of proteins involved in this pathway frequently arise in recurrent disease after pharmacological treatment. TH-MYCN is a well-characterized transgenic model of MYCN-driven neuroblastoma which recapitulates many clinicopathologic features of the human disease. Here, we evaluate the dysregulation of miRNAs in tumors from TH-MYCN mice that are either wild-type (TH-MYCN) or deficient (TH-MYCN/p53ERTAM) for the p53 tumor suppressor gene.
Principal Findings
We analyzed the expression of 591 miRNAs in control (adrenal) and neuroblastoma tumor tissues derived from either TH-MYCN or TH-MYCN/p53ERTAM mice, respectively wild-type or deficient in p53. Comparing miRNA expression in tumor and control samples, we identified 159 differentially expressed miRNAs. Using data previously obtained from human neuroblastoma samples, we performed a comparison of miRNA expression between murine and human tumors to assess the concordance between murine and human expression data. Notably, the miR-17-5p-92 oncogenic polycistronic cluster, which is over-expressed in human MYCN amplified tumors, was over-expressed in mouse tumors. Moreover, analyzing miRNAs expression in a mouse model (TH-MYCN/p53ERTAM) possessing a transgenic p53 allele that drives the expression of an inactive protein, we identified miR-125b-3p and miR-676 as directly or indirectly regulated by the level of functional p53.
Significance
Our study represents the first miRNA profiling of an important mouse model of neuroblastoma. Similarities and differences in miRNAs expression between human and murine neuroblastoma were identified, providing important insight into the efficacy of this mouse model for assessing miRNA involvement in neuroblastoma and their potential effectiveness as therapeutic targets.
Introduction
Neuroblastoma is among the most common of childhood tumors and accounts for 15% of pediatric cancer deaths. The disease is clinically heterogeneous, with behavior ranging from spontaneous regression to rapid progression. Multiple genetic abnormalities have been identified that are predictive of clinical outcome and that play important roles in neuroblastoma pathogenesis [1]. Amplification of the gene encoding the MYCN transcription factor is the most potent genetic predictor of poor patient outcome and delineates a distinct genetic subtype of high-risk neuroblastoma [2]. As a transcription factor, MYCN directly regulates the expression of a large set of genes and microRNAs (miRNA), whose major functions include regulation of cell cycle progression, proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. 3–5.
MiRNAs are small molecules (22–24 nucleotides) of RNA which negatively regulate gene expression at a post-transcriptional level. The binding of miRNAs to complementary sites on the 3′ UTRs of protein coding mRNA sequences results in either degradation of the mRNA or translational inhibition [6]. MiRNAs are involved with the regulation of many normal physiological processes and their dysregulation contributes to the pathogenesis of virtually all forms of cancer [7], [8], including neuroblastoma [9]–[11]. A number of miRNA expression profiling studies have shown that miRNA expression is deregulated in MYCN amplified (MNA) tumors relative to MYCN non-amplified tumors (non-MNA), and that miRNA expression signatures are independently predictive of patient survival [12]–[17]. Moreover, functional studies have also demonstrated that specific miRNAs promote neuroblastoma cell proliferation in in vitro and in vivo assays [18], [19], or alternately, act to suppress tumorigenesis by stimulating/reactivating apoptosis [20], [21] and differentiation [22] or by inhibiting cell invasion [23].
TH-MYCN is a murine transgenic model of neuroblastoma that is increasingly used for a variety of molecular and pre-clinical studies [24]. Tumorigenesis is driven by neural crest-specific expression of a human MYCN transgene. These animals develop aggressive tumors that replicate major features of MNA high-risk disease [24]–[26]. The oncogenic action of MYC proteins is strongly enhanced in a variety of cancers by loss of p53, a functional interaction that has been replicated by the introduction of MYC-driven transgenic models in a p53-deficient background [27]. Alterations in p53 signaling are rarely observed in neuroblastoma patients at diagnosis. However abnormalities in multiple p53 pathway members emerge after pharmacological treatment, correlating with therapeutic resistance and reinforcing the notion that strong selective pressure for p53 inactivation exists in MYCN-driven neuroblastoma [28], [29]. Indeed, murine neuroblastoma is strongly enhanced by placing TH-MYCN into a p53 insufficient background, and this is concomitant with reduced apoptosis and chemotherapy resistance [25]. The interplay between MYCN and p53, however, is complex. MYCN directly up-regulates p53 transcriptional expression [30], but also inhibits p53 through the direct up-regulation of MDM2, which encodes for a ubiquitin ligase that targets tumor protein p53 for proteasomal degradation [31]. Taken together these observations highlight the utility of these preclinical models for studies of MYCN-p53 control mechanisms [25].
Since miRNA expression levels are associated with clinical tumor grade, metastasis and overall survival in neuroblastoma, miRNAs are potential targets for therapeutic treatment. The availability of transgenic models with altered expression of individual oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in a genetically homogeneous background present an ideal opportunity to test efficacy of novel miRNA mediated therapeutics [32]. However, knowledge about miRNA expression profiles in the TH-MYCN transgenic mouse model or its variants is lacking, particularly the degree to which murine miRNA expression profiles parallel those of human neuroblastoma. Here, we generated miRNA profiles of murine tumors and adrenal tissues derived from TH-MYCN mice in both wild-type and mutant p53 deficient backgrounds. Our analyses reveal similarities and differences between the miRNA expression profiles of human and mouse neuroblastoma and have allowed us to assess the impact of p53 haploinsuffiency on miRNA expression. By comparing the miRNA profile of murine and human tumors, we demonstrate the extent to which the transgenic mouse model can be used for miRNAs related studies.
Results
MiRNA expression profiling of murine tumors
In order to identify miRNAs associated with neuroblastoma tumorigenesis, we analyzed the expression of 591 murine miRNAs in 22 mouse tumors using TaqMan low density arrays. Nine tumors were derived from TH-MYCN mice (wild-type for p53) and 13 from TH-MYCN mice in a p53 deficient background (TH-MYCN/p53ERTAM). As a control group, we profiled 12 adrenal glands (three from TH-MYCN; five from TH-MYCN/p53ERTAM mice, and four from wild-type mice) coming from young mice (7 days after birth). Adrenals coming from TH-MYCN and wild-type mice were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, confirming that the tissues were histologically normal in the transgenic mice (Figure S1). After primary profiling, the data set was filtered to include 440 miRNAs with expression in at least 10 of the samples (Figure S2).
Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on the expression of the total dataset of 440 miRNAs (Table S1) resolved tumors from adrenal gland controls (Figure 1A). Before using the adrenals as a unique group of controls regardless their genotype, we analyzed the miRNA expression of TH-MYCN (n = 8) and wild type (n = 4) adrenals finding no statistically significant differences. Then we compared all tumors (n = 22) to all adrenal controls (n = 12). Using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test corrected for multiple comparisons (n = 440), we found 159 miRNAs differentially regulated (p<0.05) in tumors: 81 were over-expressed (>2-fold) and 78 were under-expressed (>2-fold) (Table S2). Thus, miRNA expression in tumor tissue compared to a developmentally differentiated tissue precursor is significantly differentially regulated. Intriguingly, haploinsufficiency for p53 did not dramatically alter miRNA expression patterns as the tumor samples clustered together regardless their genotype.
Since the miRNA profiles did not show any major differences based on the presence of the p53-ERTAM allele, we measured expression of the endogenous p53 transcript in tumors to confirm haploinsufficiency. The primers were designed to detect expression of the endogenous wild-type p53 allele, and not the mutant p53-ERTAM allele (Figure S3A). Five TH-MYCN and 6 TH-MYCN/p53ERTAM tumors were analyzed through quantitative PCR. All TH-MYCN/p53ERTAM animals showed a reduced level of wild-type p53 mRNA (t-test, p<0.0001) (Figure S3B). These data demonstrate that no compensatory up-regulation of the endogenous p53 allele occurs in TH-MYCN/p53ERTAM tumors.
Although cluster analysis based on all miRNAs did not distinguish tumors with respect to p53 genotype, miR-125b-3p and miR-676 were significantly down-regulated (p<0.03) in TH-MYCN/p53ERTAM tumors (Figure 1B–C) based on the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test with p-values corrected for multiple comparisons (n = 440).
Cross-Comparison of miRNA expression in human and murine tumors
In order to assess the relevance of the mouse model as a representative platform for studies of important miRNA targets modulated in human neuroblastoma, we first compared the set of miRNAs differentially expressed in mouse and human tumors, using previously published miRNA expression profiles of human neuroblastoma [12], [16]. In total, 296 mature miRNAs are conserved between mouse and human in the miRBase version 16 (Table S3). Taking into account only conserved miRNAs (Figure S4A), a total of 63 miRNAs have been identified as differentially expressed in human MNA versus non-MNA tumors in at least one published study [12], [16]. Among the 63 conserved miRNAs differentially expressed between human MNA versus non-MNA tumors, 29 (46%) were differentially expressed between mouse tumors and adrenals (Figure S4B). This amount of overlap between differentially expressed miRNAs in human versus mouse tumors is statistically significant (p<0.01) according to a hypergeometric distribution [33]. The majority of the miRNAs had alterations in expression that were consistent between the two species, except for miR-323-3p, miR-369-5p, miR-410, miR-411, miR-433, miR-494 and miR-130a, which were expressed discordantly in the tumors from the two different species (Table 1). It is interesting to note that 6 out of 7 of the miRNAs that were inconsistent in the mouse/human comparison map to a large cluster on chromosome 14q in humans (mouse chromosome 12). Overall, these results showed high concordance in miRNA expression between murine and human neuroblastoma, with the aforementioned exceptions.
Table 1. miRNAs differentially expressed in mouse and human tumors.
MIRNA NAME | MOUSE TUMORS | HUMAN MNA TUMORS | |
Bray et al. | Mestdagh et al. | ||
miR-130b | Up | Up | |
miR-17 | Up | Up | |
miR-18a | Up | Up | Up |
miR-19a | Up | Up | Up |
miR-19b | Up | Up | |
miR-20a | Up | Up | Up |
miR-20b | Up | Up | Up |
miR-25 | Up | Up | |
miR-9 | Up | Up | Up |
miR-9* | Up | Up | |
miR-93 | Up | Up | |
miR-323-3p | Up | Down | |
miR-369-5p | Up | Down | |
miR-410 | Up | Down | |
miR-411 | Up | Down | |
miR-433 | Up | Down | |
miR-494 | Up | Down | |
miR-152 | Down | Down | |
miR-204 | Down | Down | |
miR-26a | Down | Down | |
miR-26b | Down | Down | |
miR-30a | Down | Down | |
miR-30a* | Down | Down | |
miR-30d | Down | Down | |
miR-30e | Down | Down | |
miR-30e* | Down | Down | |
miR-328 | Down | Down | Down |
miR-491 | Down | Down | Down |
miR-130a | Down | Up |
Up = Over-expressed in MNA tumors; Down = under-expressed in MNA tumors.
Using data previously obtained in our laboratory, we directly compared the miRNA profile of human and mouse tumors. The cohort of 146 human tumors included 36 tumors MNA and 110 samples non-MNA [12]. Comparison between human and mouse tumors was complicated by the fact that not all miRNAs in the current study were included in our prior study and by the non-conservation of many miRNAs between the species. 155 miRNAs were profiled in both murine and human tumors profiled by Bray et al. [12]. Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis with this set of 155 miRNAs of murine and human samples (n = 180 samples) indicated that murine adrenals and tumors clustered closer together relative to human tumors (Figure 2). However, hierarchical cluster analysis maintains the distinction between murine tumors and adrenals. Interestingly, this subset of miRNAs was differentially expressed in MNA versus non-MNA human tumors (χ2-test, p<0.001). The MNA branch of the dendrogram contained 31/36 (86%) of the MNA tumors, while the non-MNA branch contained 5/36 (14%) of the MNA tumors.
Since the mouse model over-expresses human MYCN, we hypothesized that there might be similarities with human MNA tumors for MYCN regulated miRNAs. Hierarchical clustering based on the conserved miRNAs differentially expressed between human MNA and non-MNA tumors [12] revealed that mouse tumors more closely resemble adrenals than human MNA tumors, (Figure 3A). As expected, there was a branch of human tumors significantly enriched (p<0.005) for MNA human tumors 22/37 (60%).
Principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out in order to identify miRNAs that could account for the distinction between human and mouse tumors and between human MNA and non-MNA tumors. Figure 3B depicts the two top ranking principal components, PC1 and PC2. The distribution of the samples in PCA discriminates the two species mainly based on PC1, while the PC2 axis highlighted a distribution of the samples according to MYCN expression. The human tumors segregated by line b (Figure 3B) were significantly enriched for MNA (25/36, 69%; χ2-test; p<0.001). To identify the miRNAs involved in these events, we analyzed the miRNAs of PC1 and PC2 (Table S4). The miRNAs that contributed most prominently to PC1 (human - mouse split) were miR-93 and miR-19a, with a lesser contribution from miR-19b, miR-20a and miR-130b, while the miRNAs that contributed most significantly to PC2 (MYCN high versus low expression) were miR-17, miR-25, miR-20b and miR-15b. Interestingly, 8 of the top 20 PC2 miRNAs were deregulated in both human and mouse tumors (Table 1). Moreover, 11 of the first 20 miRNAs contributing to each component were common to PC1 and PC2, clarifying how both the shifts, due to species and to human MYCN expression, involved the two axis. These results suggest that human MYCN may regulate similar miRNAs in human and mouse.
We finally restricted our analysis to conserved miRNAs with differential expression between murine tumors and adrenals. Interestingly, the hierarchical clustering based on this subset of miRNAs (n = 63) distinguished tumors and adrenals independent of species. Unlike previous analyses, these miRNAs delineated murine tumor tissue from adrenal with higher specificity (Figure 4A). The analysis did not clearly distinguish human MNA and non-MNA tumors, however it identified a group of samples enriched (p<0.01) for non-MNA 68/75 (91%) allowing the mouse tumors to cluster closer to the human MNA samples.
PCA again revealed an interspecies difference (PC2 axis), while the PC1 axis discriminated tumors and controls (Figure 4B). To identify the miRNAs underlying these differences, we considered the loadings of the two principal components (Table S5). The most significant contribution to PC1 was from miR-10a, miR-30a, miR-30d, let-7f, miR-22 and miR-23b, ranked in order. Consistent with the interspecies shift based on PC2, 3 out of the first 5 implicated miRNAs (miR-411, miR-410, miR-382, miR-495 and miR-494) were differentially modulated in human and mouse samples (Table 1).
Discussion
The importance of highly representative murine models for studying human pathologies and for developing new pharmacological treatments is established [32], however it is necessary to determine on a case-by-case basis the degree to which each model faithfully mimics human pathology. The TH-MYCN murine model for neuroblastoma has been well-characterized from the histopathological, gene expression and genome instability point of view [24]–[26], [34]. Here, we identify miRNAs that are differentially expressed in this model (relative to adrenal controls). Cross-comparison between this and previous human studies reveals similarities and differences between the mouse model and the human pathology with regard to miRNA expression. The miRNA profile across murine tumors is more homogeneous than that observed in human tumors, perhaps a reflection of the inbred genetic tumor environment in murine versus human tumors. This supports the use of mouse models for studying pathological events in a more defined genetic background, with reduced heterogeneity due to genetic variation that often affects human studies.
In total, 22 conserved miRNAs were differentially expressed across both murine tumor versus adrenal and human MNA versus non-MNA tumors (as identified in at least one of two independent studies on human tumors [12], [16]). This degree of similarity between human and mouse tumors is consistent with interspecies comparisons for other types of tumors [35]. Notably, several members of the miR-17-92 polycistronic cluster, which are highly up-regulated in human MNA tumors [36], were up-regulated in mouse tumors relative to the adrenal glands. This polycistronic cluster has demonstrated oncogenic functions in neuroblastoma through targeting multiple genes of the TGFB signaling pathway [18], [19]. Similarly, miR-9, which is positively regulated by MYCN in human neuroblastoma [37], was also significantly up-regulated in the mouse tumors. In addition, miR-152 is down regulated in both mouse and human neuroblastoma, having a documented tumor suppressor function in human neuroblastoma [38]. Overall, our results in the mouse model indicate that the over-expression of MYCN strongly deregulates miRNAs expression, similar to the situation in human neuroblastoma.
The major tumor suppressor miRNA, miR-34a, which is down-regulated in human neuroblastoma, was not changed in the mouse tumors and represents an example of where the mouse model is inconsistent with human neuroblastoma. Many factors are likely to account for the differences in miRNA expression between human and mouse neuroblastoma. For example, in addition to MYCN, large-scale genomic imbalances have been demonstrated to influence miRNA expression in human tumors [12]. Although some similarities in genomic imbalances have been demonstrated between murine and human tumors [34], there are also extensive differences between human and mouse genomes resulting from the accumulation of approximately 200 chromosomal rearrangements since the evolutionary divergence of rodent and primate lineages. It is also important to realize that neuroblastoma originate from fetal neuroblasts [39], so that some differences in miRNA expression between tumors and adrenal glands (from 7 day old mice) could relate to differentiation associated changes rather than cancer specific alterations. This possibility requires further testing by profiling micro-dissected fetal neuroblasts, a technically challenging endeavor.
P53 is a critical tumor suppressor gene inactivated in a variety of cancers. In neuroblastoma, p53 is rarely inactivated in primary tumors, but is often mutated in recurrent tumors. Although the p53 transcription factor is known to regulate a number of miRNAs, including miR-34a, miR-23b, miR-26, miR-30, miR-107 and miR-192 [40]–[45], there was very little difference in miRNA expression patterns between tumors derived from p53 wild-type TH-MYCN versus p53 mutant TH-MYCN mice, despite significant differences in tumor phenotype when MYCN drives neuroblastoma in a p53 deficient background [25]. This implies that p53 mediated regulation of miRNAs requires complete abrogation of p53 activity rather than p53 haploinsufficiency. Certainly this was the case for p53 regulation of miR-34a, where the effects of p53 were investigated in a p53- homozygous mouse knockout model [44], [46]. Thus, we hypothesize that the modulation of miRNAs induced by p53 is not dose dependent in our model and that the vast majority of miRNAs are not significantly involved in the more aggressive phenotype driven by p53 haploinsufficiency. However, confirmation of this supposition would require the analysis of miRNA expression derived from mice homozygous for mutant p53.
The only two miRNAs that were down-regulated in TH-MYCN tumors from TH-MYCN/p53ERTAM mice were miR-125b-3p and miR-676. No specific role has thus far been ascribed to miR-676 in human neuroblastoma, which has a seed region that is not identical between the two species. Interestingly, miR-125b has been identified as both a target of p53 [47] and a regulator of the p53 transcript itself [48]. miR-125b inhibits neuroblastoma cell proliferation and promotes cell differentiation in in vitro models [49], [50], so that down-regulation of this miRNA could potentially be contributing towards the more aggressive phenotype of the TH-MYCN/p53-ERTAM tumor phenotype. This is an interesting possibility requiring further studies.
Although many of the differentially expressed miRNAs were previously identified as being associated with human neuroblastoma (Table 1), this study identifies additional miRNAs not previously correlated with this pathology, indicating a potential role in neuroblastoma pathogenesis. Indeed, many of the most significantly differentiated miRNAs in mouse tumors versus adrenal tissue have never been associated with any form of cancer to date (Table S2). Functional studies are required to corroborate any role that these miRNAs might have in tumorigenesis. Lastly we demonstrate that, despite some differences among the two species, the mouse model recapitulates a pattern of miRNA expression that is dependent on MYCN expression and which is similar to the one observed in human MNA tumors. Our results further support the involvement of miRNAs in neuroblastoma, validating the utility of TH-MYCN mouse model for studying the role of miRNAs in this pathology and for possible pre-clinical trials based on miRNA agonist/antagonist molecules.
Materials and Methods
Transgenic mice and samples collection
TH-MYCN mice were maintained in hemizygotic matings [26]. TH-MYCN/p53ERTAM animals were obtained serially crossing TH-MYCN+/− and p53-ER +/− mice [25]. Adrenals were obtained from mice 7 day post birth, while tumors were collected after the onset of the tumor pathology (>40 days post birth). All tissue samples were either frozen in liquid nitrogen or submerged in RNAlater RNA Stabilization Reagent (Qiagen, Crawley, UK) and stored at −80°C. All animals were handled in accordance with institutional guidelines for safe and ethical treatment of mice. The protocol was approved by the U.K. Home Office (License number PPL70/6882).
RNA isolation
Total RNA extraction was performed using RNeasy (Qiagen), miRNeasy (Qiagen), or mirVana™ miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, Austin, Texas) following the manufacturer guidelines.
Reverse transcription
For messanger RNA (mRNA) cDNA synthesis, total RNA was reverse transcribed using random primers and a TaqMan Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Byosistems, Foster City, CA). Up to 762 rodent mature miRNAs were converted to cDNA (381 miRNAs processed simultaneously per reaction) using the Megaplex™ RT Rodent Pool (Applied Biosystems).
Quantitative PCR for gene expression
The level of endogenous p53 was analyzed using primers specifically designed for targeting exon 10 and 11 of the transcript (sequences of primers available on request) and SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystem). mRNA quantifications were normalized to the housekeeping gene β-actin. Relative quantification of genes expression was determined using the comparative cycle threshold method (2−ΔΔCT).
Pre-amplification and quantitative PCR of miRNAs
Megaplex retro transcription product was pre-amplified using TaqMan PreAmp Master Mix and Megaplex™ PreAmp Primers, Rodent Pool (Applied Biosystems). The miRNA profile of each cDNA sample was obtained using 384-well microfluidic cards (TaqMan® MicroRNA Array v2.0, Applied Biosystems). As instrument and liquid handling variations were shown to be minimal, no PCR replicates were measured. All quantitative PCR (qPCR) were carried out on the 7900 HT Fast Real-time System (Applied Biosystems).
Data analysis
Since the presence of a single molecule of target lead to a Ct value of 35, all miRNAs with Ct values greater than 35 were considered not expressed. The mean Ct of a sample was subtracted from the Ct value of each miRNA among that sample (mean centered normalization) before calculating relative expression values [51]. Normalized relative expression (NRQ) of miRNA was calculated with reference to the Ctmax (maximum Ct value for an individual miRNA across all samples) using: NRQ = 2(Ctmax−Ct).
Significance testing
The statistical significance of miRNA differential expression over sample classes was evaluated by assigning p-values based on the non-parametric Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. P-values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method. The statistical significance of the enrichment for a specific genotype among the groups generated by the hierarchical clustering was evaluated using the chi-squared test (χ2-test) on the frequency of observed samples compared to the expected random distribution. The statistical significance of the overlap between the lists of miRNAs was evaluated using the hypergeometric distribution [33].
miRNA homology identification
An in-house developed Java (v6.0) software was used for comparing the sequences (retrieved from miRBase v16) of human and mouse mature miRNAs. We considered as homologue only miRNAs whose mature transcript showed perfect identity in both length and nucleotide sequence among the two species.
Cluster analysis and visualization
Hierarchical clustering, heatmap generation, principal component analysis (PCA) and the loadings of PCA were performed using “hclust” (agglomeration method complete based on Spearman rank correlation coefficient), “heatmap.2”, “prcomp” and “pcs$rotation” functions of the R statistical computing language v2.13.0.
Supporting Information
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This work was supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland (07/IN.1/B1776), Children's Medical and Research Foundation, and The Neuroblastoma Society, grant NES003X. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. No additional external funding was received for this study.
References
- 1.Stallings RL. Are chromosomal imbalances important in cancer? Trends Genet. 2007;23:278–283. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Schwab M, Varmus HE, Bishop JM. Amplification of N-myc in untreated human neuroblastomas correlates with advanced disease stage. Science. 1984;224:1121–1124. doi: 10.1126/science.6719137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Murphy DM, Buckley PG, Bryan K, Das S, Alcock L, et al. Global MYCN transcription factor binding analysis in neuroblastoma reveals association with distinct E-box motifs and regions of DNA hypermethylation. PLoS One. 2009;4:e8154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Murphy DM, Buckley PG, Bryan K, Watters KM, Koster J, et al. Dissection of the oncogenic MYCN transcriptional network reveals a large set of clinically relevant cell cycle genes as drivers of neuroblastoma tumorigenesis. Mol Carcinog. 2011;50:403–411. doi: 10.1002/mc.20722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Westermann F, Muth D, Benner A, Bauer T, Henrich KO, et al. Distinct transcriptional MYCN/c-MYC activities are associated with spontaneous regression or malignant progression in neuroblastomas. Genome Biol. 2008;9:R150. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-10-r150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.He L, Hannon GJ. MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:522–531. doi: 10.1038/nrg1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.He X, He L, Hannon GJ. The guardian's little helper: microRNAs in the p53 tumor suppressor network. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11099–11101. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wiemer EA. The role of microRNAs in cancer: no small matter. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1529–1544. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stallings RL. MicroRNA involvement in the pathogenesis of neuroblastoma: potential for microRNA mediated therapeutics. Curr Pharm Des. 2009;15:456–462. doi: 10.2174/138161209787315837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stallings RL, Foley NH, Bray IM, Das S, Buckley PG. MicroRNA and DNA methylation alterations mediating retinoic acid induced neuroblastoma cell differentiation. Semin Cancer Biol. 2011;21:283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2011.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stallings RL, Foley NH, Bryan K, Buckley PG, Bray I. Therapeutic targeting of miRNAs in neuroblastoma. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2010;14:951–962. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2010.510136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bray I, Bryan K, Prenter S, Buckley PG, Foley NH, et al. Widespread dysregulation of MiRNAs by MYCN amplification and chromosomal imbalances in neuroblastoma: association of miRNA expression with survival. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Buckley PG, Alcock L, Bryan K, Bray I, Schulte JH, et al. Chromosomal and microRNA expression patterns reveal biologically distinct subgroups of 11q- neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:2971–2978. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen Y, Stallings RL. Differential patterns of microRNA expression in neuroblastoma are correlated with prognosis, differentiation, and apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2007;67:976–983. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lin RJ, Lin YC, Chen J, Kuo HH, Chen YY, et al. microRNA signature and expression of Dicer and Drosha can predict prognosis and delineate risk groups in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2010;70:7841–7850. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mestdagh P, Fredlund E, Pattyn F, Schulte JH, Muth D, et al. MYCN/c-MYC-induced microRNAs repress coding gene networks associated with poor outcome in MYCN/c-MYC-activated tumors. Oncogene. 2010;29:1394–1404. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schulte JH, Schowe B, Mestdagh P, Kaderali L, Kalaghatgi P, et al. Accurate prediction of neuroblastoma outcome based on miRNA expression profiles. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2374–2385. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fontana L, Fiori ME, Albini S, Cifaldi L, Giovinazzi S, et al. Antagomir-17-5p abolishes the growth of therapy-resistant neuroblastoma through p21 and BIM. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mestdagh P, Bostrom AK, Impens F, Fredlund E, Van Peer G, et al. The miR-17-92 microRNA cluster regulates multiple components of the TGF-beta pathway in neuroblastoma. Mol Cell. 2011;40:762–773. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Foley NH, Bray IM, Tivnan A, Bryan K, Murphy DM, et al. MicroRNA-184 inhibits neuroblastoma cell survival through targeting the serine/threonine kinase AKT2. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:83. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Welch C, Chen Y, Stallings RL. MicroRNA-34a functions as a potential tumor suppressor by inducing apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells. Oncogene. 2007;26:5017–5022. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Foley NH, Bray I, Watters KM, Das S, Bryan K, et al. MicroRNAs 10a and 10b are potent inducers of neuroblastoma cell differentiation through targeting of nuclear receptor corepressor 2. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:1089–1098. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bray I, Tivnan A, Bryan K, Foley NH, Watters KM, et al. MicroRNA-542-5p as a novel tumor suppressor in neuroblastoma. Cancer Lett. 2011;303:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weiss WA, Aldape K, Mohapatra G, Feuerstein BG, Bishop JM. Targeted expression of MYCN causes neuroblastoma in transgenic mice. EMBO J. 1997;16:2985–2995. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.11.2985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chesler L, Goldenberg DD, Collins R, Grimmer M, Kim GE, et al. Chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in a transgenic model of neuroblastoma proceeds through p53 induction. Neoplasia. 2008;10:1268–1274. doi: 10.1593/neo.08778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chesler L, Goldenberg DD, Seales IT, Satchi-Fainaro R, Grimmer M, et al. Malignant progression and blockade of angiogenesis in a murine transgenic model of neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2007;67:9435–9442. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Christophorou MA, Martin-Zanca D, Soucek L, Lawlor ER, Brown-Swigart L, et al. Temporal dissection of p53 function in vitro and in vivo. Nat Genet. 2005;37:718–726. doi: 10.1038/ng1572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bell E, Premkumar R, Carr J, Lu X, Lovat PE, et al. The role of MYCN in the failure of MYCN amplified neuroblastoma cell lines to G1 arrest after DNA damage. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:2639–2647. doi: 10.4161/cc.5.22.3443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Carr J, Bell E, Pearson AD, Kees UR, Beris H, et al. Increased frequency of aberrations in the p53/MDM2/p14(ARF) pathway in neuroblastoma cell lines established at relapse. Cancer Res. 2006;66:2138–2145. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen L, Iraci N, Gherardi S, Gamble LD, Wood KM, et al. p53 is a direct transcriptional target of MYCN in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2010;70:1377–1388. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Slack A, Lozano G, Shohet JM. MDM2 as MYCN transcriptional target: implications for neuroblastoma pathogenesis. Cancer Lett. 2005;228:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.01.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Teitz T, Stanke JJ, Federico S, Bradley CL, Brennan R, et al. Preclinical models for neuroblastoma: establishing a baseline for treatment. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fury W, Batliwalla F, Gregersen PK, Li W. Overlapping probabilities of top ranking gene lists, hypergeometric distribution, and stringency of gene selection criterion. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:5531–5534. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hackett CS, Hodgson JG, Law ME, Fridlyand J, Osoegawa K, et al. Genome-wide array CGH analysis of murine neuroblastoma reveals distinct genomic aberrations which parallel those in human tumors. Cancer Res. 2003;63:5266–5273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhu M, Yi M, Kim CH, Deng C, Li Y, et al. Integrated miRNA and mRNA expression profiling of mouse mammary tumor models identifies miRNA signatures associated with mammary tumor lineage. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R77. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-8-r77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schulte JH, Horn S, Otto T, Samans B, Heukamp LC, et al. MYCN regulates oncogenic MicroRNAs in neuroblastoma. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:699–704. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ma L, Young J, Prabhala H, Pan E, Mestdagh P, et al. miR-9, a MYC/MYCN-activated microRNA, regulates E-cadherin and cancer metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:247–256. doi: 10.1038/ncb2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Das S, Foley N, Bryan K, Watters KM, Bray I, et al. MicroRNA mediates DNA demethylation events triggered by retinoic acid during neuroblastoma cell differentiation. Cancer Res. 2010;70:7874–7881. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.De Preter K, Vandesompele J, Heimann P, Yigit N, Beckman S, et al. Human fetal neuroblast and neuroblastoma transcriptome analysis confirms neuroblast origin and highlights neuroblastoma candidate genes. Genome Biol. 2006;7:R84. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-9-r84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bohlig L, Friedrich M, Engeland K. p53 activates the PANK1/miRNA-107 gene leading to downregulation of CDK6 and p130 cell cycle proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:440–453. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Boominathan L. The guardians of the genome (p53, TA-p73, and TA-p63) are regulators of tumor suppressor miRNAs network. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2011;29:613–639. doi: 10.1007/s10555-010-9257-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pichiorri F, Suh SS, Rocci A, De Luca L, Taccioli C, et al. Downregulation of p53-inducible microRNAs 192, 194, and 215 impairs the p53/MDM2 autoregulatory loop in multiple myeloma development. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:367–381. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 43.Chang TC, Wentzel EA, Kent OA, Ramachandran K, Mullendore M, et al. Transactivation of miR-34a by p53 broadly influences gene expression and promotes apoptosis. Mol Cell. 2007;26:745–752. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Raver-Shapira N, Marciano E, Meiri E, Spector Y, Rosenfeld N, et al. Transcriptional activation of miR-34a contributes to p53-mediated apoptosis. Mol Cell. 2007;26:731–743. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tarasov V, Jung P, Verdoodt B, Lodygin D, Epanchintsev A, et al. Differential regulation of microRNAs by p53 revealed by massively parallel sequencing: miR-34a is a p53 target that induces apoptosis and G1-arrest. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:1586–1593. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.13.4436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.He L, He X, Lim LP, de Stanchina E, Xuan Z, et al. A microRNA component of the p53 tumour suppressor network. Nature. 2007;447:1130–1134. doi: 10.1038/nature05939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gueta K, Molotski N, Gerchikov N, Mor E, Savion S, et al. Teratogen-induced alterations in microRNA-34, microRNA-125b and microRNA-155 expression: correlation with embryonic p53 genotype and limb phenotype. BMC Dev Biol. 2010;10:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-10-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Le MT, Teh C, Shyh-Chang N, Xie H, Zhou B, et al. MicroRNA-125b is a novel negative regulator of p53. Genes Dev. 2009;23:862–876. doi: 10.1101/gad.1767609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Laneve P, Di Marcotullio L, Gioia U, Fiori ME, Ferretti E, et al. The interplay between microRNAs and the neurotrophin receptor tropomyosin-related kinase C controls proliferation of human neuroblastoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:7957–7962. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700071104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Le MT, Xie H, Zhou B, Chia PH, Rizk P, et al. MicroRNA-125b promotes neuronal differentiation in human cells by repressing multiple targets. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:5290–5305. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01694-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mestdagh P, Van Vlierberghe P, De Weer A, Muth D, Westermann F, et al. A novel and universal method for microRNA RT-qPCR data normalization. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R64. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-r64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.