Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomarkers. 2011 Aug 9;16(6):517–524. doi: 10.3109/1354750X.2011.604133

Table 2.

Neurodevelopmental test scoresa.

ID number 13 16b 4 88 79 14 59 70 91 45 54
Wisc-IV
Verbal comprehensive 79 n.a 99 99 98 98 119 112 93 110 121
Perceptual reasoning 88 n.a 100 86 110 106 108 100 96 94 125
Working memory 74 n.a 88 110 110 116 102 120 71 113 97
Processing speed 103 n.a 94 94 97 94 106 112 75 94 118
Full-scale IQ 81 n.a 95 96 105 105 113 114 81 105 121
BASC-2
Externalizing problems 79 41 71 59 58 51 48 52 64 48 45
Internalizing problems 68 45 99 79 54 53 52 49 61 60 35
Behavioral symptom index 79 51 76 72 58 49 50 48 67 59 38
Adaptive skills 33 35 40 54 43 53 60 47 47 38 66
BRIEF
Behavioral regulation index 93 44 64 81 60 64 57 46 62 58 36
Metacognition index 74 53 61 68 63 52 52 49 64 71 35
General executive composite 83 50 63 74 62 57 54 48 64 67 34
CADS-IV
ADHD index 69 65 60 48 77 58 50 45 63 69 41
Inattentive 71 62 62 48 71 54 51 53 59 64 41
Hyperactive-impulsive 85 43 63 51 74 59 57 46 56 64 43
Total 80 54 68 49 74 57 54 50 59 65 41
a

WISC-IV: a score of 70 or below are considered clinically significant while scores of 71–75 are considered borderline problematic; BASC-2: For Externalizing, Internalizing, and Behavioral Symptom scales, T-scores of 70 or greater are considered clinically significant, and scores of 66–70 are considered to be of borderline clinical significance; for the Adaptive skills scale, T-scores of 30 or lower are considered clinically significant, and scores of 31–35 are considered to be of borderline clinical significance; BRIEF: T-scores of 65 or greater are considered clinically significant and scores of 60–64 are considered to be of borderline clinical significance; CADS-IV: T-scores of 70 or greater are considered clinically significant, and scores of 66–70 are considered to be of borderline clinical significance.: clinically significant;: borderline clinical significance.

b

The WISC-IV of one child were not considered valid and were not considered in the analyses.