Skip to main content
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International logoLink to Deutsches Ärzteblatt International
letter
. 2011 Nov 4;108(45):768. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0768b

Correspondence (letter to the editor): Risk of Venous Thromboembolism

Ursula Gundert-Remy, Thomas Stammschulte *
PMCID: PMC3230167  PMID: 22163254

Wiegratz and Thaler provide a comprehensive overview of hormonal contraception using the combined oral contraceptive (COC) pill, while also discussing side effects and risks (1). Unfortunately the risks are not comprehensively discussed, and the current state of knowledge is not reflected. With regard to the risk of venous thromboembolism, this may be because of the timing of the article submission.

The authors explain that there are indications of a modified risk for venous thromboembolism as a result of the gestagen component, and that combined preparations including desogestrel, gestodene, and cyproterone acetate entail a higher risk than COCs that include levonorgestrel. This statement is correct, but the authors make no mention at all of the more recent data concerning the risk of venous thromboembolism when using COCs containing drospirenone (2, 3). This is inexplicable since drospirenone-containing COCs are among the most commonly prescribed hormonal contraceptives in Germany (4) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has looked into assessing the risk for venous thromboembolism in association with several COCs on the basis of more recent study results as early as in March 2010 and, most recently, in May 2011 (see www.ema.europa, plenary meeting, March 2010 and May 2010).

The EMA classes the risk for COCs containing drospirenone as higher than for COCs containing levonorgestrel, and it assumes that it corresponds to the risk associated with COCs containing desogestrel and gestodene.

In a notice in this issue of Deutsches Ärzteblatt (in German), the risk of venous thromboembolism is the subject of further discussion, as in our opinion the EMA’s assessment should be considered in the individual prescription of any COC.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.

References

  • 1.Wiegratz I, Thaler CJ. Hormonal contraception: what kind, when, and for whom? Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108(28-29):495–506. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jick SS, Hernandez RK. Risk of non-fatal venous thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives containing drospirenone compared with women using oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel: case-control study using United States claims data. BMJ. 2011;342 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Parkin L, Sharples K, Hernandez RK, Jick SS. Risk of venous thromboembolism in users of oral contraceptives containing drospirenone or levonorgestrel: nested case-control study based on UK General Practice Research Database. BMJ. 2011;342 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schwabe U, Paffrath D, editors. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Medizin Verlag; 2010. Arzneiverordnungs-Report 2010. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Deutsches Ärzteblatt International are provided here courtesy of Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH

RESOURCES