Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2011 Dec;55(12):5590–5596. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00466-11

Prospective Multicenter Study of the Epidemiology, Molecular Identification, and Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis Isolated from Patients with Candidemia

Emilia Cantón 1,*, Javier Pemán 2, Guillermo Quindós 3, Elena Eraso 3, Ilargi Miranda-Zapico 3, María Álvarez 4, Paloma Merino 5, Isolina Campos-Herrero 6, Francesc Marco 7, Elia Gomez G de la Pedrosa 8, Genoveva Yagüe 9, Remedios Guna 10, Carmen Rubio 11, Consuelo Miranda 12, Carmen Pazos 13, David Velasco 14; the FUNGEMYCA Study Group
PMCID: PMC3232769  PMID: 21930869

Abstract

A 13-month prospective multicenter study including 44 hospitals was carried out to evaluate the epidemiology of Candida parapsilosis complex candidemia in Spain. Susceptibility to amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin was tested by the microdilution colorimetric method. A total of 364 C. parapsilosis complex isolates were identified by molecular methods: C. parapsilosis (90.7%), Candida orthopsilosis (8.2%), and Candida metapsilosis (1.1%). Most candidemias (C. parapsilosis, 76.4%; C. orthopsilosis, 70.0%; C. metapsilosis, 100%) were observed in adults. No C. orthopsilosis or C. metapsilosis candidemias occurred in neonates. C. parapsilosis was most frequent in adult intensive care unit (28.8%), surgery (20.9%), and internal medicine (19.7%) departments; and C. orthopsilosis was most frequent in hematology (28.6%), pediatrics (12.0%), and neonatology (11.5%) departments. The geographic distribution of C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis was not uniform. According to CLSI clinical breakpoints, all C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis isolates were susceptible to the nine agents tested. Resistance (MICs > 1 mg/liter) was observed only in C. parapsilosis: amphotericin B, posaconazole, itraconazole, and caspofungin (0.3% each), anidulafungin (1.9%), and micafungin (2.5%). Applying the new species-specific fluconazole and echinocandin breakpoints, the rates of resistance to fluconazole for C. parapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis increased to 4.8% and 0.3%, respectively; conversely, for C. parapsilosis they shifted from 1.9 to 0.6% (anidulafungin) and from 2.5 to 0.6% (micafungin). Our study confirms the different prevalence of C. parapsilosis complex candidemia among age groups: neither C. orthopsilosis nor C. metapsilosis was isolated from neonates; interestingly, C. metapsilosis was isolated only from adults and the elderly. The disparity in antifungal susceptibility among species could be important for therapy.

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of invasive candidiasis has been increasing throughout the world in recent years, and invasive candidiasis is associated with a high mortality rate (41). At present, a large proportion of bloodstream infections are due to non-Candida albicans Candida spp., with Candida parapsilosis being the second most commonly isolated Candida spp. from blood cultures in Asia, Latin America, and some European countries (2, 16, 35, 36, 40). Furthermore, C. parapsilosis is the second most common yeast causing candidemia in children (3, 5, 57), and it has even become the predominant species in some pediatric hospitals (29, 33).

C. parapsilosis is a common saprophyte of the skin, and many infections caused by this species are associated with its carriage on the hands of health care workers (6). This species is commonly related to catheter- and intravenous hyperalimentation-associated candidemia due to its capability to adhere to and develop biofilms on the surfaces of intravascular devices (7, 27, 45). In fact, C. parapsilosis has emerged as a significant nosocomial pathogen, with clinical manifestations that include endophthalmitis, endocarditis, septic arthritis, peritonitis, and fungemia usually being associated with invasive procedures or prosthetic devices (54).

On account of its heterogeneity, C. parapsilosis was divided into three groups on the basis of differences of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), DNA sequencing of different genes, and morphotyping (10, 25, 28, 30, 44). In 2005, Tavanti et al. (48) suggested that the C. parapsilosis complex could be replaced by 3 different closely related species named C. parapsilosis sensu stricto, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis. These species may show differences in antifungal susceptibilities and virulence, and an increased interest in the study of their epidemiology has arisen in the last years (8, 19, 23, 31, 34, 46, 47, 51, 52). Interestingly, the incidence of C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis infections may have increased since 2004 (31), with prevalence rates ranging from 2.3 to 9% and 0.9 to 6.9%, respectively, depending on the geographical area and clinical specimens analyzed. However, there are few national reports, including reports with extensive demographic information, such as age, hospitalization unit, or the patient's underlying condition. The object of this study was to describe the epidemiological characteristics, clinical significance, and in vitro susceptibilities to nine systemic antifungal agents of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis isolates yielded in the FUNGEMYCA multicenter study (35).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design.

The FUNGEMYCA survey was a prospective, sequential, hospital population-based study. Forty-four Spanish institutions, widely distributed throughout the country, including the Canary and Balearic Islands, participated in this study. Participating hospitals were required to collect and identify the isolates from blood cultures and to complete, for each fungemia episode, a questionnaire with demographic information, clinical signs of sepsis, and risk factors or predisposing diseases within the preceding 30 days. Approval for the study was obtained from the ethic committees of all participating institutions.

Period of study.

The study was carried out over a 13-month period, from January 2009 to February 2010.

Definitions.

An episode of fungemia was defined as the isolation of a yeast or mold species from a culture of blood from a patient with temporally related clinical signs and symptoms. In patients with more than one episode of fungemia, an episode was defined as a new case if it occurred more than 30 days after the previous episode. Outpatient-acquired fungemia was considered when the fungal etiologic agent was isolated in blood in the first 48 h after hospital admission. Neonates were defined to be less than 30 days of age; children were between 1 month and 15 years old, adults were between 16 and 64 years old, and the elderly were more than 64 years old.

Identification of organisms and antifungal susceptibility testing.

All yeast species isolated from blood cultures were identified at the participating institutions by the routine methods in use at each laboratory: AUXACOLOR (Bio-Rad, Madrid, Spain) or API 20C AUX, ID 32C, or Vitek-2 (bioMérieux, Madrid, Spain). Isolates were stored as suspensions in sterile water at ambient temperature for ulterior studies. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed in the first isolate from each fungemia episode at the participating hospitals by the microdilution colorimetric Sensititre YeastOne SYO-09 panel (TREK Diagnostic Systems, Cleveland, OH). This commercial method determines the MICs of nine antifungal agents: amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin. To categorize the isolates, CLSI breakpoints have been applied (13), on the basis of the good correlation between the two methods. Since no breakpoints have been published for posaconazole and amphotericin B, isolates inhibited by >1 mg/liter were considered resistant to these drugs. The recently published species-specific clinical breakpoints for fluconazole and echinocandins were also applied (14, 38, 42). Isolates for which fluconazole MICs were ≤2 mg/liter were categorized susceptible and were categorized resistant if MICs were >4 mg/liter. Furthermore, for the three echinocandins, isolates inhibited by ≤2 mg/liter and >4 mg/liter were classified susceptible and resistant, respectively. As a control, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258 were assayed in each center before the start of the study. All MIC results for control strains were within the ranges for susceptible and resistant.

Molecular identification of cryptospecies from C. parapsilosis.

The identities of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis isolates were confirmed as previously described by Tavanti et al. (48, 49).

Isolates were grown on fresh Sabouraud agar (Difco, St. Louis, MO) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. A 3-μl equivalent of yeast was scraped from the plate and resuspended in 20 μl of sterile water. The yeast suspensions were treated by heating to 95°C for 8 min and then placed in a −80°C freezer for 1 to 2 h.

For identification of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis, the amplification of the SADH gene was performed by PCR with the primers S1F (5′-TTGATGCTGTTGGATTGT-3′) and S1R (5′-CAATGCCAAATCTCCCAA-3′), which amplify a fragment of 716 bp (48, 49). PCR mixtures were prepared as suggested by the manufacturer (Bioline, London, United Kingdom). Each 25-μl reaction mix contained 2 μl of the prepared yeast supernatant. The amplification conditions were as follows: a first cycle of 5 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles at 92°C for 1 min, at 45°C for 1 min, and at 68°C for 1 min, with a final extension step of 10 min at 68°C. The PCR product was then digested with BanI enzyme (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) in a 40-μl volume containing 20 μl of the PCR product and 40 U of BanI and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. The digestion products were separated on a 1% agarose gel, stained with GelRed, and visualized with UV light. Isolates of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis were identified by differences in SADH amplicons containing the restriction sites that were one, zero (no restriction site), and three BanI restriction sites, respectively. All isolates identified as C. orthopsilosis or C. metapsilosis were digested a second time for confirmation. Furthermore, the identities of these species were confirmed by DNA sequencing of ITS1 and ITS4 regions of the 28S rRNA gene to avoid the possibility of misidentification due to a possible point mutation in C. parapsilosis sensu stricto. The PCR was carried out with panfungal ITS1 and ITS4 primers (55, 56) under the following conditions: a first cycle of 5 min at 95°C, followed by 30 cycles at 95°C for 1 min, at 60°C for 30 s, and at 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension step of 10 min at 72°C. The amplicons were sequenced and BLAST searches were performed for species identification.

Statistical analyses.

Data were analyzed with SPSS software (version 10.0.7; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Continuous variables were compared by Student's t test, and categorical variables were compared by the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Comparison of antifungal susceptibility was carried out with log2 MIC. Differences in antifungal susceptibility patterns among species and age groups were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

During the study period (January 2009 to February 2010), 1,356 cases of fungemia were included in the FUNGEMYCA project. C. parapsilosis sensu lato was isolated from 400 episodes, representing an incidence of 29.1%, in 400 patients, comprising 231 males (57.7%) and 169 females 50.6 ± 29.1 and 47.4 ± 29.7 years of age (mean ± standard deviation), respectively. No statistically significant differences between sexes were found (P = 0.436).

Of these 400 episodes, there were 364 C. parapsilosis sensu lato isolates, identified by molecular methods: 330 (90.7%) C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates, 30 (8.2%) C. orthopsilosis isolates, and 4 (1.1%) C. metapsilosis isolates. PCR identification was not available for 36 isolates. Table 1 depicts the species distribution by age group. The mean age of patients with C. parapsilosis fungemia was 48.4 ± 29.3 years (range, 3 days to 97 years); that for patients with C. orthopsilosis fungemia was 46.7 ± 31.2 (range, 36 days to 87 years), and that for patients with C. metapsilosis fungemia was 62.2 ± 14.8 (range, 48 to 74 years). C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis fungemias were mainly observed in patients older than 15 years of age: 76.4%, 70%, and 100% of episodes, respectively. Interestingly, there were no C. orthopsilosis or C. metapsilosis fungemias in neonates.

Table 1.

Species distribution by age group

Age groupa No. (%) of isolates
C. parapsilosis C. orthopsilosis C. metapsilosis Total
Neonates 20 (6.1) 0 0 20 (5.5)
Children 58 (17.6) 8 (26.7) 0 66 (18.1)
Adults 129 (39.1) 10 (33.3) 2 (50) 141 (38.7)
Elderly 123 (37.3) 11 (36.7) 2 (50) 137 (37.6)
Total 330 (90.7) 30 (8.2) 4 (1.1) 364 (100)
a

Neonates, <1 month old; children, 1 month to 15 years old; adults, 16 to 64 years old; elderly, >64 years old.

Moreover, nine patients showed mixed fungemia episodes, all of them caused by C. parapsilosis sensu stricto species and other species of Candida: Candida albicans (in six episodes), Candida tropicalis (in two episodes), and Candida lusitaniae (in one episode). No outpatient-acquired fungemia by C. parapsilosis sensu lato species was identified during the study period.

Overall, 34.6% of the C. parapsilosis sensu lato fungemia episodes were observed in intensive care units (ICUs), but there were no C. orthopsilosis or C. metapsilosis fungemias recorded in either pediatrics or ICU-neonatal departments (Table 2). C. parapsilosis sensu stricto was isolated most frequently from patients with fungemia in the following departments: ICU-adults (28.8%), surgery (20.9%), internal medicine (19.7%), neonatology (7%), and pediatrics (6.7%). It was the most commonly isolated species in all the departments included in the current study. Of interest, hematology (6/21, 28.6%), pediatrics (3/25, 12.0%), and neonatology (3/26, 11.5%) were the departments with the highest proportion of C. orthopsilosis fungemias.

Table 2.

Clinical hospitalization units and species distribution

Hospitalization unit No. (%) of isolates
C. parapsilosis C. orthopsilosis C. metapsilosis Total
Surgery 69 (20.9) 5 (16.7) 1 (25) 75 (20.6)
Hematology 14 (4.2) 6 (20.0) 1 (25) 21 (5.8)
Internal medicine 65 (19.7) 4 (13.3) 1 (25) 70 (19.2)
Neonatology 23 (7.0) 3 (10.0) 0 26 (7.1)
Oncology 19 (5.8) 2 (6.7) 0 21 (5.8)
Pediatrics 22 (6.7) 3 (10.0) 0 25 (6.9)
ICU
    Adult 95 (28.8) 7 (23.3) 1 (25) 103 (28.3)
    Neonatal 9 (2.7) 0 0 9 (2.5)
    Pediatrics 14 (4.2) 0 0 14 (3.8)
Total 330 (100) 30 (100) 4 (100) 364 (100)

Table 3 shows the underlying conditions of patients with candidemia by C. parapsilosis sensu lato. The presence of an indwelling catheter was the most frequent underlying condition for all species: C. metapsilosis (4 out of 4 episodes, 100%), C. orthopsilosis (22/30, 73.3%), and C. parapsilosis (215/330, 65.2%). Interestingly, 46.7% (14/30) of C. orthopsilosis fungemias occurred in surgical patients. The geographic distribution of C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis fungemias was not uniform throughout the country; most isolates of C. orthopsilosis (54%) were observed in only two Spanish regions (Andalusia and Valencia), situated in the south and east of Spain, respectively. In relation to all C. parapsilosis sensu lato isolates, the geographic prevalence rate of C. orthopsilosis candidemia ranged from 0% to 30.8%, with the Balearic Islands (30.8%), Asturias (20%), Valencia (12.3%), and Galicia (11.8%) being the regions where this species was more frequently isolated. Conversely, 2 out of 4 cases of candidemia by C. metapsilosis were observed in Asturias, where it represented 40% of C. parapsilosis sensu lato isolated in this geographic area.

Table 3.

Patients' underlying conditions and species distribution

Underlying conditiona No. (%) of isolates
C. parapsilosis C. orthopsilosis C. metapsilosis Total
Catheterization 215 (65.2) 22 (73.3) 4 (100) 241 (66.2)
Major surgery 133 (40.3) 14 (46.7) 1 (25) 148 (40.6)
HIV infection 5 (1.5) 0 0 5 (1.4)
Burns 19 (5.8) 0 0 19 (5.2)
Neutropenia 17 (5.2) 4 (16.7) 1 (25) 23 (6.3)
SOT 7 (2.1) 2 (6.7) 0 9 (2.5)
HSCT 23 (7.0) 2 (6.7) 0 25 (6.9)
Premature birth 18 (5.5) 2 (6.7) 0 20 (5.5)
a

SOT, solid organ transplant; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplant; neutropenia, <500 cells/ml.

Table 4 summarizes the in vitro susceptibilities of C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis isolates. When comparing the susceptibility of isolates in the four age groups, for the three species, the geometric mean (GM) MICs of all antifungal agents were very similar, although, in general, GM MICs were slightly higher in the adult group. The upper limits of the MIC ranges were higher for C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates, and no statistically significant interspecies differences were found when the GM MICs were analyzed, except for micafungin and C. parapsilosis sensu stricto and C. orthopsilosis (0.79 and 0.40 mg/liter, respectively; P = 0.004).

Table 4.

Antifungal in vitro susceptibility of C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis isolates

Species (no. of isolates tested) Drug GM MIC (mg/liter) for indicated group
MIC (mg/liter)
No. (%) of resistant isolates
Neonates Children Adults Elderly Overall Range 50% 90% CLSI CBP/ECVa
C. parapsilosis (330) Anidulafungin 1.1 0.85 1.00 0.82 0.90 0.016–8 1 2 6 (1.8) 2 (0.6)
Caspofungin 0.35 0.32 0.37 0.31 0.34 0.008–8 0.5 1 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3)
Micafungin 0.86 0.82 0.89 0.72 0.81 0.008–16 1 2 8 (2.4) 4 (1.2)
Fluconazole 0.77 0.76 0.98 0.85 0.88 0.06–32 1 2 0 15 (5.5)
Itraconazole 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.016–1 0.06 0.12 1 (0.3) ND
Posaconazole 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.008–2 0.03 0.12 1 (0.3) 5 (1.5)
Voriconazole 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.008–1 0.016 0.06 0 10 (3.0)
Amphotericin B 0.24 0.28 0.32 0.28 0.29 0.12–2 0.25 0.5 1 (0.3) ND
Flucytosine 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.06–8 0.06 0.25 0 ND
C. orthopsilosis (30) Anidulafungin 0.50 0.76 0.47 0.56 0.12–2 0.5 1 0 0
Caspofungin 0.28 0.35 0.26 0.30 0.12–1 0.25 0.5 0 0
Micafungin 0.37 0.47 0.28 0.37 0.12–2 0.5 1 0 0
Fluconazole 0.61 0.93 0.84 0.85 0.25–16 0.5 2 0 1 (0.3)
Itraconazole 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.016–0.25 0.12 0.25 0 ND
Posaconazole 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.016–0.25 0.06 0.12 0 0
Voriconazole 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.008–0.25 0.016 0.03 0 1 (0.3)
Amphotericin B 0.23 0.34 0.19 0.24 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.5 0 ND
Flucytosine 0.07 0.07 0.11 0.08 0.06–4 0.06 0.12 0 ND
C. metapsilosis (4) Anidulafungin 0.25 0.71 0.42 0.25–1 0.25 1 0 0
Caspofungin 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.5 0.5 0 0
Micafungin 0.71 0.50 0.59 0.5–1 0.5 1 0 0
Fluconazole 1.41 1.00 1.19 1–2 1 2 0 0
Itraconazole 0.06 0.35 0.15 0.03–0.5 0.12 0.5 0 ND
Posaconazole 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.06–0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0
Voriconazole 0.06 0.13 0.09 0.03–0.06 0.03 0.06 0 0
Amphotericin B 0.35 1.00 0.50 0.25–1 0.5 1 0 ND
Flucytosine 0.09 0.18 0.13 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.25 0 ND
a

CBP, new clinical breakpoint (12, 39) for fluconazole and echinocandins; ECV, epidemiological cutoff value for posaconazole and voriconazole; ND, not determined.

All isolates of C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis were susceptible to the nine antifungal agents tested according to CLSI clinical breakpoints. Resistance was observed only in C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates. The rate of resistance to amphotericin B, posaconazole, itraconazole, and caspofungin was very low: only one isolate each (0.3%). In addition, six isolates (1.8%) were resistant to anidulafungin and eight (2.4%) to micafungin. Interestingly, all isolates of this species were susceptible to fluconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine.

Applying the new species-specific clinical breakpoints for fluconazole and echinocandins (14, 38, 42), the rates of fluconazole resistance increased for C. parapsilosis sensu stricto and C. orthopsilosis to 5.5% and 0.3%, respectively. Conversely, the rates of anidulafungin and micafungin resistance for C. parapsilosis sensu stricto shifted from 1.8 to 0.6% for anidulafungin and from 2.4 to 1.2% for micafungin. Results for 5 (1.5%) and 10 (3.0%) isolates of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto were above epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) for posaconazole and voriconazole (>0.25 and >0.12 mg/liter, respectively) (37), and the result for only 1 isolate (0.3%) of C. orthopsilosis was above the voriconazole ECV (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

The importance of C. parapsilosis as a cause of candidemia and invasive candidiasis has risen in the last years. In some European and South American countries, C. parapsilosis sensu lato is the second or even the first most common etiological agent of candidemia (2, 15, 21, 22, 53). This species is more important in neonates in neonatal ICUs (4, 12). The current report corroborates the rising importance of members of the C. parapsilosis complex as bloodstream pathogens and shows recent data from a nationwide study on the epidemiology, clinical relevance, and antifungal in vitro susceptibilities of members of this species complex isolated during 2009 in 44 Spanish hospitals. At present, there are few national reports analyzing the epidemiology or the in vitro susceptibility of these species. The existing studies are mostly multinational or local and include only partial demographic information, such as age, hospitalization unit, or the patient's underlying condition, with the consequent difficulty for comparison to previous studies (Table 5).

Table 5.

Previous studies of invasive infections caused by the Candida parapsilosis complexa

Authors (reference) Origin(s) of isolates Kind of multicenter study No. of participating centers Total no. of isolates
No. of indicated species (% with respect to Candida spp., % with respect to C. parapsilosis sensu lato)
Candida spp. C. parapsilosis sensu lato C. parapsilosis C. orthopsilosis C. metapsilosis
Diekema et al. (18) Blood and SS Worldwide 100 14,007 2,027 1,895 (13.5, 93.5) 102 (0.7, 5.0) 30 (0.2, 1.5)
Lockhart et al. (31) Blood and SS Worldwide 89 1,929 1,778 (UD, 92.2) 117 (UD, 6.1) 34 (UD, 1.8)
García-Effron et al. (20) Blood 1 756 293 218 (28.8, 74.4) 69 (9.1, 23.5) 6 (0.8, 2.1)
Blyth et al. (5) Blood National 52 1,005 191 180 (17.9, 94.2) 7 (0.7, 3.7) 4 (0.4, 2.1)
Gonçalves et al. (24) Blood National 11 141 124 (UD, 88) 13 (UD, 9) 4 (UD, 3)
Gómez-López et al. (23) Blood Local 14 345 87 76 (22.0, 87.3) 5 (1.4, 5.7) 6 (1.7, 6.9)
Kocsubé et al. (26) Blood National 2 125 12 11 (8.8, 91.6) 0 1 (0.8, 8.4)
Silva et al. (46) Blood 1 60 60 (UD, 100) 0 0
Chen et al. (11) Blood 1 59 54 (UD, 91.5) 2 (UD, 3.4) 3 (UD, 5.0)
de Toro et al. (17) Blood 1 62 56 (UD, 90.3) 6 (UD, 9.6) 0
Miranda-Zapico et al. (32) Blood 1 128 125 (UD, 97.7) 2 (UD, 1.6) 1 (UD, 0.8)
Our study Blood National 44 1,356 364 330 (24.3, 90.7) 30 (2.2, 8.2) 4 (0.3, 1.1)
a

SS, sterile sites; UD, unknown data.

In the FUNGEMYCA study, 400 out of 1,356 isolates were identified as C. parapsilosis sensu lato (29.5%), with this organism being the species isolated the second most frequently from blood, after C. albicans, in Spain (35). Of these 400 isolates, 364 were identified by molecular methods, with C. parapsilosis sensu stricto representing 90.7% of isolates, C. orthopsilosis 8.2%, and C. metapsilosis 1.1%. This distribution of species agrees with the distributions previously published in other multicenter candidemia studies (Table 5), where C. parapsilosis sensu stricto has been the most frequently isolated species (87.3 to 94.2%) among the C. parapsilosis sensu lato organisms, followed by C. orthopsilosis (0 to 9%) and C. metapsilosis (1.5 to 8.4%) (18, 23, 24, 26, 31). Although the species distribution rates vary depending on continent, country, or institution, C. parapsilosis and C. metapsilosis have been the most and least frequently isolated species, respectively, in many studies. However, some authors have reported that C. metapsilosis was more common than C. orthopsilosis (11, 23, 26, 43, 46).

C. parapsilosis sensu stricto was the most frequently isolated species in all age groups analyzed. C. orthopsilosis was not isolated from neonates, and in agreement with other reports (5, 20, 31), the highest percentage of this species was observed in the elderly. Moreover, C. metapsilosis was not isolated from patients younger than 15 years of age, as has also been previously described (20, 31). Conversely, Tay et al. (50) did not observe C. metapsilosis isolates in blood from adult patients. The reported frequency of isolation of C. metapsilosis in blood is very low. It has also been isolated from other body sites or fluids, such as the respiratory tract, mucosal surface, urine, and even the hands of health care workers (11, 11, 46, 51). This lower frequency of C. metapsilosis infection could be in line with the recent report indicating that this species is the least virulent of the C. parapsilosis complex in cellular infection models (34). In fact, the absence among pediatric patients in this study may simply be related to the overall rarity of this species. In our study, C. parapsilosis is also the species most frequently isolated from all hospitalization units. The highest percentages of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto (28.8%) and C. orthopsilosis (23.3%) isolates are observed in the ICU-adult setting. On the other hand, the most common underlying condition contributing to fungemia for the three species is the presence of indwelling catheters (65.3 to 100%). These findings confirm and extend those reported in previous studies (17, 20, 32, 46).

The prevalence of candidemia caused by C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis is highly variable in Spain. Most isolates of C. orthopsilosis (56.6%) were isolated in only two Mediterranean Spanish regions (Andalusia and Valencian). However, the Balearic Islands (30.8%) and Asturias (20%) are the Spanish regions where C. orthopsilosis is isolated more frequently in blood cultures. Conversely, the four isolates of C. metapsilosis were cultured in three hospitals from Asturias (two isolates), Madrid, and Valencia. To our knowledge, there are two Spanish studies published on the prevalence of the C. parapsilosis complex in Seville (17) and Barcelona (23), and two more, from the Bilbao area and a Valencian institution, have recently been published (20, 32). The prevalence of C. metapsilosis ranges from 0 to 6.9% and that for C. orthopsilosis ranges from 1.6 to 23.5% among blood isolates previously identified as C. parapsilosis sensu lato. Lockhart et al. (31), in their global surveillance study, also included 49 C. parapsilosis sensu lato isolates from Spanish hospitals in Madrid, with C. metapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis comprising 2.0 and 4.1% of isolates, respectively. Our results are similar to those previously published in different Spanish studies, but the climatic, socioeconomic, and sanitary conditions and recruitment characteristics of each study could explain this variation in the frequency of these species.

There is an increasing concern about the antifungal resistance or tolerance of C. parapsilosis to current and new antifungal agents. Different in vitro antifungal susceptibility patterns have been reported, with C. parapsilosis sensu stricto being less susceptible to amphotericin B, echinocandins, and fluconazole than C. metapsilosis or C. orthopsilosis (26, 31). In our study, MICs of antifungal agents were within the MIC ranges reported by other authors (18, 23, 24, 31, 46, 4951). All C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis isolates were very susceptible to the nine antifungal agents tested. In contrast, in the study of Diekema et al. (18), which included the highest number of isolates tested to date, 30.4% of C. orthopsilosis isolates and 10% of C. metapsilosis isolates were inhibited by >1 mg/liter of amphotericin B. Moreover, they 1 observed fluconazole-resistant isolate out of 102 C. orthopsilosis isolates (MIC = 64 mg/liter).

However, in the current study, which applied the new species-specific clinical breakpoints or the ECV, one C. orthopsilosis isolate was considered resistant to fluconazole and in another the voriconazole MIC was above the ECV. For C. parapsilosis sensu stricto, the rates of fluconazole resistance increased from 0% to 5.5%, and for anidulafungin and micafungin, they shifted from 1.8 to 0.6% and from 2.4 to 0.6%, respectively. Moreover, 1.5 and 1.2% of isolates of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto had values above the ECVs for posaconazole and voriconazole, respectively. These variations in antifungal susceptibilities have also been reported by other authors (17, 23, 24) and could be of great importance to the therapeutic approach to these invasive infections that is taken. It must be commented that all MIC values reported by these authors have been determined using the CLSI M27-A3 methodology; although breakpoints are method specific, we have used them in this study for the SYO-09 panel since this method has been approved and has shown results that correlate with those of the CLSI methodology. Discrepant results are possible but rare, particularly for isolates with borderline MIC values, mainly for azole agents (1, 9, 39).

The current multicenter study confirms the increasing importance of the species in the C. parapsilosis complex as etiological agents in bloodstream Candida infections. There are differences in the presence of C. metapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis infections in the different age groups. Interestingly, at the present, neither C. orthopsilosis nor C. metapsilosis has been isolated in neonates. Moreover, C. metapsilosis has been recovered only in adult patients. Finally, the disparity in antifungal susceptibility, with C. metapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis being more susceptible to antifungal drugs than C. parapsilosis sensu stricto, could have importance in the treatment of candidemia. These data emphasize the necessity for further studies monitoring the epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility of C. metapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. parapsilosis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The FUNGEMYCA Study was supported financially by an unrestricted grant from Astellas Pharma, S.A. Collaboration with G.Q., E.E., and I.M.-Z. has also been funded by projects GIC07 123-IT-222, S-PE08UN35, and S-PR09UN01 (Gobierno Vasco) and PI061895/2006 (Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria del Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo de España).

Besides the authors, the following have also collaborated in the FUNGEMYCA study: Julia Alcoba (Hospital Universitario N. S. de la Candelaria, Tenerife), Josefina Ayats (Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat), Nuria Borrell (Hospital Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca), Miguel Ángel Bratos (Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid), Buenaventura Buendía (Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid), Juan J. Camarena (Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia), Julia Echeverría (Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián), Juliana Esperalba (Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda), Guillermo Ezpeleta (Hospital Basurto, Bilbao), Isabel Fernández-Natal (Hospital General, León), Dionisia Fontanals (Corporació Sanitari Parc Tauli, Sabadell), Julio García (Hospital La Paz, Madrid), Inmaculada García-García (Hospital Clínico Universitario, Salamanca), Ana María García-Tapia (Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz), Amelia Gómez-Nieto (Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid), Bárbara Gomila (Hospital General, Castellón), Jesús Guinea (Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid), Isabel Iglesias (Complejo Hospitalario, Vigo), María José Linares-Sicilia (Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba), Estrella Martín-Mazuelos (Hospital Universitario N.S. Valme, Seville), José Martínez-Alarcón (Hospital General, Ciudad Real), David Navarro (Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia), Luisa Pérez del Molino (Complejo Hospitalario, Santiago de Compostela), Aurelio Porras (Hospital Carlos Haya, Málaga), Inmaculada Ramírez (Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora), Antonio Rezusta (Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza), Eva María Roselló (Hospital Valle Hebrón, Barcelona), Gloria Royo (Hospital General Universitario, Elche), María Teresa Ruiz-Pérez de Pipaon (Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville), Ferrán Sánchez-Reus (Hospital Universitari de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona), Anabel Suárez (Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena, Seville), and Luis Torroba (Hospital Universitario Virgen del Camino, Pamplona).

Footnotes

The members of the FUNGEMYCA Study Group are listed in Acknowledgments.

Published ahead of print on 19 September 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Alexander B. D., et al. 2007. Comparative evaluation of Etest and Sensititre YeastOne panels against the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A2 reference broth microdilution method for testing Candida susceptibility to seven antifungal agents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 698–706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Almirante B., et al. 2006. Epidemiology, risk factors, and prognosis of Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infections: case-control population-based surveillance study of patients in Barcelona, Spain, from 2002 to 2003. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 1681–1685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Arendrup M. C., et al. 2011. National surveillance of fungemia in Denmark (2004 to 2009). J. Clin. Microbiol. 49: 325–334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Benjamin D. K., Jr., et al. 2006. Neonatal candidiasis among extremely low birth weight infants: risk factors, mortality rates, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics 117: 84–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Blyth C. C., et al. 2009. Not just little adults: candidemia epidemiology, molecular characterization, and antifungal susceptibility in neonatal and pediatric patients. Pediatrics 123: 1360–1368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bonassoli L. A., Bertoli M., Svidzinski T. I. 2005. High frequency of Candida parapsilosis on the hands of healthy hosts. J. Hosp. Infect. 59: 159–162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Branchini M. L., Pfaller M. A., Rhine-Chalberg J., Frempong T., Isenberg H. D. 1994. Genotypic variation and slime production among blood and catheter isolates of Candida parapsilosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32: 452–456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cantón E., Espinel-Ingroff A., Pemán J., del Castillo L. 2010. In vitro fungicidal activity of echinocandins against Candida metapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis and C. parapsilosis by time killing studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54: 2194–2197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Cantón E., et al. 2005. Sensititre YeastOne caspofungin susceptibility testing of Candida clinical isolates: correlation with results of NCCLS M27-A2 multicenter study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 1604–1607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cassone A., et al. 1995. Biotype diversity of Candida parapsilosis and its relationship to the clinical source and experimental pathogenicity. J. Infect. Dis. 171: 967–975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Chen Y. C., et al. 2010. Molecular epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis in Taiwan. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 68: 284–292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Clerihew L., Lamagni T. L., Brocklehurst P., McGuire W. 2006. Invasive fungal infection in very low birth weight infants: national prospective surveillance study. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal ed. 91: F188–F192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, approved standard. CLSI document M27-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2011. Minutes of the Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing meeting. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Colombo A. L., et al. 2006. Epidemiology of candidemia in Brazil: a nationwide sentinel surveillance of candidemia in eleven medical centers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2816–2823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Costa-de-Oliveira S., Pina-Vaz C., Mendonca D., Goncalves R. A. 2008. A first Portuguese epidemiological survey of fungaemia in a university hospital. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 27: 365–374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. de Toro M., Torres M. J., Maite R., Aznar J. 2011. Characterization of Candida parapsilosis complex isolates. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 17: 418–424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Diekema D. J., et al. 2009. In vitro activity of seven systemically active antifungal agents against a large global collection of rare Candida species as determined by CLSI broth microdilution methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3170–3177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Gacser A., Schafer W., Nosanchuk J. S., Salomon S., Nosanchuk J. D. 2007. Virulence of Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis in reconstituted human tissue models. Fungal Genet. Biol. 44: 1336–1341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. García-Effron G., et al. 2011. Assessment of two new molecular methods for identification of Candida parapsilosis sensu lato species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49: 3257–3261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Godoy P., et al. 2003. Species distribution and antifungal susceptibility profile of Candida spp. bloodstream isolates from Latin American hospitals. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 98: 401–405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Gómez J., et al. 2009. Nosocomial candidemia at a general hospital: the change of epidemiological and clinical characteristics. A comparative study of 2 cohorts (1993-1998 versus 2002-2005). Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 26: 184–188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Gómez-López A., et al. 2008. Prevalence and susceptibility profile of Candida metapsilosis and Candida orthopsilosis: results from population-based surveillance of candidemia in Spain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 1506–1509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Goncalves S. S., et al. 2010. Prevalence rates and antifungal susceptibility profiles of the Candida parapsilosis species complex: results from a nationwide surveillance of candidaemia in Brazil. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 16: 885–887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kato M., Ozeki M., Kikuchi A., Kanbe T. 2001. Phylogenetic relationship and mode of evolution of yeast DNA topoisomerase II gene in the pathogenic Candida species. Gene 272: 275–281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kocsube S., et al. 2007. Occurrence and genetic variability of Candida parapsilosis sensu lato in Hungary. J. Med. Microbiol. 56: 190–195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Krcmery V., Barnes A. J. 2002. Non-albicans Candida spp. causing fungaemia: pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. J. Hosp. Infect. 50: 243–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Lehmann P. F., Lin D., Lasker B. A. 1992. Genotypic identification and characterization of species and strains within the genus Candida by using random amplified polymorphic DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30: 3249–3254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Levy I., Rubin L. G., Vasishtha S., Tucci V., Sood S. K. 1998. Emergence of Candida parapsilosis as the predominant species causing candidemia in children. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26: 1086–1088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Lin D., Wu L. C., Rinaldi M. G., Lehmann P. F. 1995. Three distinct genotypes within Candida parapsilosis from clinical sources. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33: 1815–1821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lockhart S. R., Messer S. A., Pfaller M. A., Diekema D. J. 2008. Geographic distribution and antifungal susceptibility of the newly described species Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis in comparison to the closely related species Candida parapsilosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2659–2664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Miranda-Zapico I., et al. 2011. Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility patterns of new crypto-species inside the species-complexes Candida parapsilosis and Candida glabrata among blood isolates from a Spanish tertiary hospital. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 66: 2315–2322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Neu N., et al. 2009. Epidemiology of candidemia at a children's hospital, 2002 to 2006. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 28: 806–809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Orsi C. F., Colombari B., Blasi E. 2010. Candida metapsilosis as the least virulent member of the ‘C. parapsilosis’ complex. Med. Mycol. 48: 1024–1033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Pemán J., et al. 2011. Variación de la epidemiologia de las fungemias y de la sensibilidad a fluconazol de los aislamientos en los últimos 10 años en España: resultados del estudio FUNGEMYCA. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 28: 91–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Pemán J., Canton E., Gobernado M. 2005. Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from blood: results of a 2-year multicentre study in Spain. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 24: 23–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Pfaller M. A., et al. 2011. Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for posaconazole and voriconazole and Candida spp. as determined by 24-hour CLSI broth microdilution. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49: 630–637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Pfaller M. A., et al. 2010. Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for the echinocandins and Candida spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48: 52–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Pfaller M. A., et al. 2008. Clinical evaluation of the Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric antifungal panel for antifungal susceptibility testing of the echinocandins anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2155–2159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Pfaller M. A., Diekema D. J. 2007. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20: 133–163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Pfaller M. A., Diekema D. J. 2010. Epidemiology of invasive mycoses in North America. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 36: 1–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Pfaller M. A., et al. 2011. Clinical breakpoints for the echinocandins and Candida revisited: integration of molecular, clinical, and microbiological data to arrive at specie-specific interpretative criteria. Drug Resist. Updat. 14: 164–176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Pryce T. M., et al. 2006. Rapid identification of fungal pathogens in BacT/ALERT, BACTEC, and BBL MGIT media using polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer regions. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 54: 289–297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Roy B., Meyer S. A. 1998. Confirmation of the distinct genotype groups within the form species Candida parapsilosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 216–218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sarvikivi E., et al. 2005. Emergence of fluconazole resistance in a Candida parapsilosis strain that caused infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2729–2735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Silva A. P., Miranda I. M., Lisboa C., Pina-Vaz C., Rodrigues A. G. 2009. Prevalence, distribution, and antifungal susceptibility profiles of Candida parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis in a tertiary care hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 2392–2397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Szabo Z., et al. 2009. In vitro efficacy of 5 antifungal agents against Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis as determined by time-kill methodology. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 64: 283–288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Tavanti A., Davidson A. D., Gow N. A., Maiden M. C., Odds F. C. 2005. Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. to replace Candida parapsilosis groups II and III. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 284–292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Tavanti A., Hensgens L. A., Ghelardi E., Campa M., Senesi S. 2007. Genotyping of Candida orthopsilosis clinical isolates by amplification fragment length polymorphism reveals genetic diversity among independent isolates and strain maintenance within patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 1455–1462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Tay S. T., Na S. L., Chong J. 2009. Molecular differentiation and antifungal susceptibilities of Candida parapsilosis isolated from patients with bloodstream infections. J. Med. Microbiol. 58: 185–191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. van Asbeck E. C., Clemons K. V., Martinez M., Tong A. J., Stevens D. A. 2008. Significant differences in drug susceptibility among species in the Candida parapsilosis group. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 62: 106–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Varga I., et al. 2008. Comparison of killing activity of caspofungin against Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 62: 1466–1468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Viudes A., et al. 2002. Candidemia at a tertiary-care hospital: epidemiology, treatment, clinical outcome and risk factors for death. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21: 767–774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Weems J. J., Jr 1992. Candida parapsilosis: epidemiology, pathogenicity, clinical manifestations, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Clin. Infect. Dis. 14: 756–766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. White P. L., et al. 2006. A consensus on fungal polymerase chain reaction diagnosis?: a United Kingdom-Ireland evaluation of polymerase chain reaction methods for detection of systemic fungal infections. J. Mol. Diagn. 8: 376–384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. White P. L., Shetty A., Barnes R. A. 2003. Detection of seven Candida species using the Light-Cycler system. J. Med. Microbiol. 52: 229–238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Zaoutis T. E., et al. 2005. Antifungal susceptibility of Candida spp. isolated from pediatric patients: a survey of 4 children's hospitals. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 52: 295–298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES