Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2011 Dec;55(12):5676–5684. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00101-11

Role of the MexEF-OprN Efflux System in Low-Level Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ciprofloxacin

Catherine Llanes 1, Thilo Köhler 2, Isabelle Patry 1, Barbara Dehecq 1, Christian van Delden 2, Patrick Plésiat 1,*
PMCID: PMC3232816  PMID: 21911574

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the resistance mechanisms to fluoroquinolones of 85 non-cystic fibrosis strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibiting a reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (MICs from 0.25 to 2 μg/ml). In addition to MexAB-OprM (31 of 85 isolates) and MexXY/OprM (39 of 85), the MexEF-OprN efflux pump (10 of 85) was found to be commonly upregulated in this population that is considered susceptible or of intermediate susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, according to current breakpoints. Analysis of the 10 MexEF-OprN overproducers (nfxC mutants) revealed the presence of various mutations in the mexT (2 isolates), mexS (5 isolates), and/or mvaT (2 isolates) genes, the inactivation of which is known to increase the expression of the mexEF-oprN operon in reference strain PAO1-UW. However, these genes were intact in 3 of 10 of the clinical strains. Interestingly, ciprofloxacin at 2 μg/ml or 4 μg/ml preferentially selected nfxC mutants from wild-type clinical strains (n = 10 isolates) and from first-step mutants (n = 10) overexpressing Mex pumps, thus indicating that MexEF-OprN represents a major mechanism by which P. aeruginosa may acquire higher resistance levels to fluoroquinolones. These data support the notion that the nfxC mutants may be more prevalent in the clinical setting than anticipated and strongly suggest the involvement of still unknown genes in the regulation of this efflux system.

INTRODUCTION

Fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin are widely used in the treatment of chronic and acute infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9). However, the efficacy of these antibiotics may be compromised by the emergence of resistant mutants exhibiting drug target alterations (GyrA, ParC, GyrB, ParE) (1, 44, 49) or overproducing drug efflux mechanisms (47). Four active efflux pumps belonging to the resistance nodulation cell division (RND) family of transporters may be responsible for an increased (2- to 16-fold) resistance to these agents when overexpressed as a result of mutations, namely, MexAB-OprM, MexXY/OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexEF-OprN (32, 42, 64). Other efflux systems of the RND (MexHI-OpmD, MexPQ-OpmE) (43, 51), the MATE (multidrug and toxic compound extrusion) (PmpM) (20), or the ABC (Orf12) (56) family of transporters have also been reported to export fluoroquinolones in laboratory mutants of P. aeruginosa, but their relevance in the clinical setting remains unknown.

The MexEF-OprN pump is expressed at very low levels in wild-type bacteria and does not significantly contribute to the natural resistance of this species to antibiotics (32). Its stable upregulation (nfxC-type mutants) is typically associated with a higher resistance to fluoroquinolones, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim, and carbapenems. In addition, the resultant phenotype shows hypersusceptibility to various β-lactams (ticarcillin, cefepime, ceftazidime, aztreonam) and aminoglycosides (32, 40). To date, only a few clinical strains have been identified as nfxC mutants (45, 48). Data from animal models of infection seem to indicate that such mutants are less efficient at providing fluoroquinolone resistance in vivo than in vitro (17) and that they have an impaired virulence (28, 31, 34).

Expression of the MexEF-OprN-encoding operon is positively regulated by a LysR-type transcriptional activator (MexT) encoded by a gene (mexT) adjacent to the mexEF-oprN operon (32). The protein MexT has additional regulatory functions as it downregulates expression of oprD, the gene for the carbapenem-selective porin OprD, and the mexAB-oprM operon that determines the efflux system MexAB-OprM (40). In several PAO1 laboratory subclones, overexpression of the mexEF-oprN operon has been found to result from mutations in the mexT gene, that surprisingly revert or suppress mutations inactivating this gene (39). However, this is not the case in other susceptible reference strains, such as PA14 (http://www.pseudomonas.com), which contain the “active” form of MexT. Some nfxC mutants exhibit alterations in the mexS flanking gene (21, 53), which codes for a putative oxidoreductase positively regulated by MexT (31). Whether the inactivation of MexS eventually leads to accumulation of secondary metabolites which may serve as effector molecules for MexT is still hypothetical (31, 36). Downstream of the mexT gene, the mexT-mexE intergenic DNA contains two nod boxes (31), which were recently identified as a MexT-binding site (nod box 1) and as part of the mexEF-oprN promoter (nod box 2) (41). Adding to this complex regulation of MexEF-OprN, it was finally reported that mutations in the mvaT gene enhanced mexEF-oprN expression (61). MvaT belongs to the histone-like nucleoid structuring protein (H-NS) family and is a global regulator involved in quorum-sensing-dependent responses and biofilm formation (8).

The goal of the present work was to gain information about the mechanisms involved in low-level resistance to fluoroquinolones in P. aeruginosa with emphasis on the characteristics of nfxC mutants found in the clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.

Eighty-five nonredundant clinical strains of P. aeruginosa collected between 2004 and 2007, and exhibiting a low-level resistance to ciprofloxacin (MIC from 0.25 to 2 μg/ml) were selected from our laboratory collection. According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints (7), the strains are considered susceptible (MIC, ≤1 μg/ml) or of intermediate susceptibility (MIC, 2 μg/ml) to ciprofloxacin. These bacteria were isolated from blood (n = 25), sputum (n = 23), superficial body sites (n = 18), urine (n = 13), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (n = 2), and other sources (n = 4). The well-characterized mutants PT629 (10), MutGR1 (60), EryR (18), and PAO7H (32) that all derive from wild-type reference strain PAO1-UW (PAO1 University of Washington) (55) were used as positive controls in reverse transcription real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) experiments for identification of gain-of-efflux mutants overexpressing MexAB-OprM, MexXY/OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexEF-OprN pumps, respectively. Plasmid pMEQR1 (this study) which carries the wild-type mexS gene from PAO1-UW, cloned in the broad-host range vector pME6001 (4), was employed to complement clinical nfxC strains. Three wild-type susceptible reference strains (PAO1-UW, PA14, and ATCC 27853) as well as 7 wild-type susceptible clinical strains collected in our hospital (MAR-1, BOU-1, SCL-1, SCH-1, VIT-1, LAU-1, and PUB-1), and 10 efflux overproducers selected from the present collection (32.1, 37.1, 40.1, 43.1, 3994, 4070, 4016, 4173, 4175, and 4177) were used for selection of ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants in vitro. Unless otherwise specified, all of the bacterial strains were cultivated on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) or in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) (Bio-Rad, Marne-la-Vallée, France) at 37°C.

Drug susceptibility testing.

The MICs of selected antibiotics were determined by the conventional macrodilution technique (6) in Mueller-Hinton agar containing adjusted concentrations of divalent cations (BBL, Cockeysville, MD). Since variations in MIC due to efflux pumps can be within a 2-fold range, MIC values were determined at least twice, in two independent experiments. The categorization of strains in S, I, and R was performed according to CLSI breakpoints (7).

Characterization of gain-of-efflux mutants.

Constitutive upregulation of efflux pumps known to extrude fluoroquinolones (MexAB-OprM, MexXY/OprM, MexCD-OprJ, MexEF-OprN, MexGHI-OpmD, MexPQ-OpmE, MexVW/OprM, and PmpM) was assessed for the 85 clinical strains by RT-qPCR. The transcript levels of mexB, mexY, mexC, mexE, mexG and mexV genes were determined as reported previously (10, 23, 27, 35). Primers were designed by Primer3 software v.0.4.0 (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3) to quantify the mRNAs of the mexQ and pmpM genes (Table 1). The mRNA levels were normalized in each strain to that of the rpsL housekeeping gene (46) and expressed as ratios to the values of strain PAO1 (by definition, set at 1). The strains were considered overproducing mutants when their transcript levels of the mexB, mexY, mexC, or mexE gene were higher than the respective thresholds defined by Hocquet et al. (24). In the absence of positive controls or defined thresholds available for the mexG, mexQ, and pmpM genes, we arbitrarily considered these strongly repressed genes (in PAO1) (63) as overexpressed when their respective mRNA levels were at least 5-fold more than in PAO1. The concordance between the RT-qPCR results and the drug resistance phenotype was considered for each strain. In a previous study, MexAB-OprM overproduction (mexB gene transcripts ≥2-fold that of PAO1) was found to be correlated with a ≥4-fold increase in resistance to ticarcillin (MIC, ≥64 μg/ml) and aztreonam (MIC, ≥16 μg/ml) (37). Similarly, MexXY/OprM overproduction (mexY gene levels ≥5-fold that of PAO1) correlated either with a ≥2-fold increase in aminoglycoside resistance or with a cefepime/ceftazidime MIC ratio of ≥4 (23). MexEF-OprN and MexCD-OprJ overproducers exhibited mexE and mexC gene transcript levels ≥100-fold more than in PAO1, respectively (24). Compared to wild-type bacteria, both types of mutants showed a >2-fold hypersusceptibility to ticarcillin, aztreonam, and aminoglycosides (26, 32). Finally, overproduction of MexEF-OprN was specifically associated with a ≥4-fold increase in imipenem resistance, while upregulation of MexCD-OprJ resulted in a 2- to 4-fold-higher resistance to cefepime. The mRNA amounts of the mexT activator gene were assessed with nfxC mutants as previously described (61).

Table 1.

Primers used for DNA sequencing, gene cloning, and RT-qPCR

Function and oligonucleotide name Primer sequence (5′ to 3′) Size (bp) Reference
Sequencing
    nfxB gene (564 bp)
        nfxB-1 ACGCGAGGCCAGTTTTCT 731 26
        nfxB-2 ACTGATCTTCCCGAGTGTCG 26
        inter-nfxB1 GTCGCAGGCCTGGATGAT 502a This study
        inter-nfxB2 CTGCACCGTCAGGACCTC This study
    mexS (1,020 bp)
        PA2491-F CGGATACAGTCACAACCCATGAG 1,157 53
        PA2491-R CGGTCAACGATCTGTGGATCTG 53
        seqmexS-1 CAAGGGCGTCAATGTCATC This study
        seqmexS-2 GATGACATTGACGCCCTTG This study
        seqmexS-3 GGAGGCCAGCGTCTACTA This study
        seqmexS-4 GACACCGACGAGACCTTCAT This study
    mexT gene (915 bp)
        MexT-1 GTAGTAGACGCTGGCCTCCAC 1,921b 57
        MexT-2 GTGAATTCGTCCCACTCGTTC 57
        seqmexT-1 CTATTGATGCCGAACCTGCT This study
        seqmexT-2 AATAGTCGTCGAGGGTCAGC This study
        seqmexT-3 TGATGAAAACGGATCACTCG This study
        seqmexT-4 GGGAACTAATCGAACGAC This study
    mvaT gene (374 bp)
        MvaT-1 CGCGGTTTACTTACAGTTTCG 347 This study
        MvaT-2 AACGCTATTCGCTGGAGACT This study
Gene cloning
    mexS gene
        qrh-PB GGCATAGGATCCCTGACAGGCATAGC This study
        qrh-MH GACCGGTATAAGCTTCGCGCAATGG This study
RT-qPCR
    mexQ gene
        mexQ-1 GCAGGTGACTACCGCCTATC 104 This study
        mexQ-2 ATGTACAGCATCCCCTCGAC This study
    pmpM gene
        pmpM-3 AACATCCCGATCAACTACGC 131 This study
        pmpM-4 CTTGTTCACCCAGAACAGCA This study
a

Intergenic region between the nfxB and mexC genes.

b

Contains the mexS-mexT and mexT-mexE intergenic regions.

PCR conditions and DNA sequencing.

A search for mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of GyrA, GyrB, ParC, and ParE was performed for the 85 clinical strains and for the ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants selected in vitro, according to the method described by Hocquet et al. (22). The mexXY operon was sequenced (58) for five strains exhibiting wild-type or increased susceptibility levels to aminoglycosides while overexpressing the mexY gene significantly. The nfxB, mexT, mexS, and mvaT genes and the nfxB-mexC and mexT-mexE intergenic regions were sequenced on both strands in strains with mexCD-oprJ or mexEF-oprN overexpression, respectively (Table 1).

Construction of pMEQR1 and complementation experiments.

To construct plasmid pMEQR1, a 1.4 kb DNA fragment carrying the mexS gene from PAO1-UW was amplified with primers qrh-PB and qrh-MH (Table 1). After restriction with BamHI and SphI, the resulting fragment was inserted into BamHI-SphI-cleaved pUC119 (59) to yield plasmid pQRH1. A 1.4-kb KpnI-HindIII fragment from the latter construct was then subcloned into the broad-host range expression vector pME6001, yielding pMEQR1. In gene complementation experiments, pMEQR1 and pME6001 (Gmr) were transferred by triparental mating into nfxC strains 40.1, 93.1, 3936, 3974, 4099, and 4198 by using Escherichia coli HB101(pRK2013) (Kmr) as a helper strain (30). Transconjugants were selected on MHA supplemented with gentamicin (30 μg/ml) and ampicillin (40 μg/ml) to counterselect E. coli donor strains.

Genotype analysis.

To determine whether the 10 MexEF-OprN overproducers were clonally related, we analyzed their single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) types by using Clondiag chips (Alere, Sèvres, France), as previously described (62).

Serotype determination.

Production of band B LPS, carrying the O antigen of P. aeruginosa, was assessed by slide agglutination of fresh colonies with specific antisera (Bio-Rad, Marne-la-Vallée, France). The O serotype was restored in nonagglutinable isolate 66.1 by culturing bacteria in MHB supplemented with amikacin at a 1:6 MIC (54).

In vitro selection of ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants.

Ten wild-type strains (MIC of ciprofloxacin, 0.12 μg/ml) and 10 characterized gain-of-efflux mutants (MIC, 0.5 μg/ml) were compared for their ability to become resistant to higher concentrations of ciprofloxacin. Approximately 5 × 109 bacteria collected at the logarithmic phase (optical density at 600 nm [OD600], ∼1) and at the stationary phase (OD600, >3) of growth in MHB were plated on MHA plates containing 2 μg/ml or 4 μg/ml ciprofloxacin. In parallel, the initial inoculum was quantified by spreading appropriate dilutions on drug-free MHA and subsequent colony counting. After 36 h of incubation at 37°C, the resistant clones were counted, replicated on drug-free MHA, and finally streaked on ciprofloxacin (2 μg/ml or 4 μg/ml). Only those colonies developing on drug-containing plates after the second transfer were scored as resistant mutants. Their numbers were compared to those of the initial inoculum to calculate mutant frequencies. In each experiment, the resistance profiles of 10 randomly chosen colonies were established by the diffusion method in MHA with 16 antibiotic disks (Bio-Rad). Those exhibiting different resistance profiles were subsequently frozen at −70°C for further analysis (RT-qPCR determination of the transcript levels of mexB, mexC, mexE and mexY genes and analysis of the QRDR sequences). All of the experiments were carried out in triplicate from independent batches of culture.

RESULTS

P. aeruginosa strains with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin.

In order to characterize the resistance mechanisms responsible for low-level fluoroquinolone resistance in P. aeruginosa, 85 nonrepetitive, non-cystic fibrosis (non-CF) clinical strains with ciprofloxacin MICs ranging from 0.25 to 2 μg/ml were selected from our laboratory collection. According to the CLSI breakpoints, 73 of 85 were “susceptible” (MIC, ≤1 μg/ml) and 12 of 85 were of “intermediate susceptibility” (MIC, 2 μg/ml) to this antibiotic. As reported previously (19), levofloxacin was 2- to 4-fold less effective than ciprofloxacin (Table 2). Ceftazidime, meropenem, tobramycin, and amikacin were the most active antibiotics tested (≥90% susceptible strains). Of note, only 19.8% of the isolates were susceptible to all the products tested except ciprofloxacin. Seventy of the 85 isolates displayed a significant increase in resistance (≥4-fold the MIC for reference strain PAO1-UW) to one or several aminoglycosides (n = 21 isolates), β-lactams (n = 52), and/or carbapenems (n = 32).

Table 2.

Susceptibility rates of the 85 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa

Antibiotic MIC for clinical isolates
MICs of PAO1-UW (μg/ml)
MIC range (μg/ml) Categorization (%)a
MIC50/MIC90 (μg/ml)
S I R
Ciprofloxacin 0.25–2 85.9 14.1 0 0.5/2 0.12
Levofloxacin 0.5–8 80 16.5 3.5 2/4 0.5
Ticarcillin 1–1,024 81.2 18.8 32/128 16
Ceftazidime 0.5–64 90.6 5.9 3.5 4/8 2
Cefepime 0.5–16 89.4 10.6 0 4/16 2
Aztreonam 1–64 54.1 30.6 15.3 8/32 4
Imipenem 0.5–16 85.9 7.0 7.1 2/8 1
Meropenem 0.03–16 96.5 2.3 1.2 1/2 0.5
Gentamicin ≤0.125–1,024 41.2 37.6 21.2 8/32 4
Tobramycin 0.125–256 90.6 3.5 5.9 2/4 1
Amikacin 0.5–64 95.3 2.3 2.4 8/16 8
Apramycin 1–256 32/64 16
a

As defined by the CLSI breakpoints. S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant; —, the CLSI has not defined this category for this antibiotic.

Mechanisms responsible for low resistance to ciprofloxacin.

RT-qPCR experiments revealed a high prevalence (86%) of mutants overexpressing one (n = 64) or two (n = 9) efflux systems (Table 3). MexXY/OprM (n = 39) and MexAB-OprM (n = 31) were by far the most prevalent pumps derepressed in this collection. Confirming previous data on CF (25) and non-CF (26) strains, MexCD-OprJ overproducers were quite rare (n = 2). One of the two nfxB mutants (strain 4070) exhibited a low-level resistance to ticarcillin (MIC, 64 μg/ml) because of concomitant overproduction of MexAB-OprM (i.e., ticarcillin is a good substrate for the latter system). Expression of the mexG, mexQ, and pmpM genes were from 0.1 to 4.5-fold that of reference strain PAO1-UW, strongly suggesting that MexGHI-OpmD, MexPQ-OpmE, and PmpM, respectively were not activated in the selected strains.

Table 3.

Mechanisms involved in low-level ciprofloxacin resistance in the 85 clinical isolates

Resistance mechanismsa
No. of strains (n = 85) Ciprofloxacin MIC range (μg/ml)
Efflux systems overproduced
Mutations in QRDRs
Unknown mechanism
MexAB-OprM MexXY MexCD-OprJ MexEF-OprN GyrA GyrB
+ 21 0.25–2
+ S466F 1 2
+ + 7 0.5–1
+ + 1 1
+ +* 1 0.5
+ 32 0.25–2
+** 1 2
+ 9 0.5–2
D87N 1 1
T83I 3 0.5–2
S466Y 1 1
S466F 1 2
+ 6 0.25–2
a

Sequencing of the nfxB gene, the repressor gene of MexCD-OprJ, revealed a A24E substitution in strain 4070 (indicated with an asterisk) located in the DNA binding domain of the NfxB protein, as well as a G180S change in strain 4044 (indicated with a double asterisk).

Sequencing of the QRDRs revealed single mutations in the gyrA or gyrB gene in seven strains, with ciprofloxacin MICs ranging from 0.5 to 2 μg/ml (Table 3), but no mutations in the parC and parE genes. In strain 4065 (ciprofloxacin MIC, 2 μg/ml), the S466F alteration of subunit GyrB was concurrent with MexAB-OprM upregulation. In six strains (MICs ranging from 0.25 to 2 μg/ml), no fluoroquinolone resistance determinants could be identified despite complete sequencing of the gyrA gene (14) and a PCR search for qnr genes (5) (data not shown). Four of these strains exhibited a wild-type resistance phenotype, except with a lower susceptibility (2- to 4-fold) to fluoroquinolones compared with PAO1-UW. The other two strains (3990 and 4068) were nontypeable, suggesting LPS alterations (38).

Resistance profiles of the nfxC mutants.

Interestingly, we found a relatively high number (n = 10 isolates) of MexEF-OprN overproducers in the collection, coming from superficial body sites (3963, 3974, 4099, 4177, 4198), blood cultures (40.1, 93.1, 4088), or respiratory samples (3936, 4076). Genotyping of these strains using the Clondiag chips showed that none of them shared the same SNP profile (Table 4). Similar to typical in vitro-selected nfxC mutants, the 10 isolates exhibited a 4- to 16-fold-higher resistance to ciprofloxacin and imipenem than PAO1-UW. Furthermore, 6/10 strains were hypersusceptible to the other β-lactams tested owing to impaired mexAB-oprM expression (from 2- to 100-fold less than in PAO1) (Table 4). In the four remaining bacteria, the hypersusceptibility to β-lactams was masked by MexAB-OprM being overproduced (Table 4, strain 3974) or by derepression of intrinsic cephalo- sporinase AmpC (strains 93.1, 4076, and 4177). This was demonstrated by the complete reversion of β-lactam resistance by growth in the presence of AmpC inhibitor cloxacillin at 1,000 μg/ml (data not shown). As already noted for in vitro selected mutants, 7 of 10 strains were hypersusceptible to aminoglycosides and exhibited decreased expression of the mexXY operon (mexY gene levels ≤2-fold that of PAO1-UW) (16, 53). The 22-fold-higher expression of the mexY gene in one strain (3974) was not associated with a higher resistance to aminoglycosides possibly because of multiple mutations affecting protein MexY (Y181D, Q282R, Q866H, S874P) in this isolate.

Table 4.

Characterization of the MexEF-OprN overproducersa

Strain MIC (μg/ml)
Genotype (SNP) Alteration(s) in regulators of MexEF-OprNb
mRNA levels for indicated gene
CIP LVX GEN TOB AMK APR FEP TIC CAZ ATM IMP MEM MexS MexT MvaT mexE mexT mexB mexY
Reference strains
    PAO1-UW 0.12 0.5 4 1 8 16 2 16 2 4 1 0.5 ND d 1 1 1 1
    PAO7H 2 8 4 0.5 4 16 2 8 2 1 4 2 0002 *e 1,075 1 0.5 2.1
Clinical strains
    40.1 0.5 2 4 1 4 16 1 8 1 2 4 1 239A E54G, G78S, †c * 446 0.4 0.01 1
    93.1 1 4 2 0.5 4 8 8 64 32 16 4 2 2812 A75V, † * 1,081 0.4 0.5 0.1
    3936 2 4 2 0.5 2 8 0.5 4 0.5 1 4 0.5 859A * 1,760 0.3 0.4 0.5
    3963 1 2 4 1 2 16 1 8 1 ≤2 4 0.5 E882 * 324 0.2 0.4 0.6
    3974 1 4 4 1 8 16 8 64 4 16 4 4 6992 A75V, † * 128 0.3 2.3 22
    4076 2 4 0.5 0.12 1 8 4 32 16 16 8 2 882A * 2,281 0.3 0.6 0.2
    4088 2 4 2 0.5 2 8 1 8 1 1 8 0.25 B421 G257S, * 678 0.3 0.6 0.6
    4099 0.5 1 2 0.25 1 4 1 8 0.5 2 4 0.5 A671 T152A, † * Δ1bp (230) 1,035 0.2 0.5 0.5
    4177 0.5 1 8 0.5 2 8 4 64 16 32 16 2 802A R166H, * 510 0.2 0.4 0.4
    4198 2 4 1 0.25 1 8 1 8 1 1 4 1 F42A K17T, A175V, E181D, †, S289T, V308I, V318I * A115T 1,013 0.5 0.4 0.6
a

CIP, ciprofloxacin; LVX, levofloxacin; GEN, gentamicin; TOB, tobramycin; AMK, amikacin; APR, apramycin; FEP, cefepime; TIC, ticarcillin; CAZ, ceftazidime; ATM, aztreonam; IMP, imipenem; MEM, meropenem. ND, not determined.

b

Amino acid positions refer to strain PAO1-UW (http:/www.pseudomonas.com).

c

†, the D249N substitution was considered nonsignificant because it was found also in PA14 and in seven environmental susceptible strains (data not shown).

d

‡, identical to the PAO1-UW sequence.

e

*, active mexT gene missing the 8-bp insert (34) found in PAO1-UW.

Role of MexT in MexEF-OprN upregulation.

Nucleotide sequencing of the mexT gene revealed that all of the 10 nfxC mutants had the 8-bp (119- to 126-bp) deletion known to result in reversion of the nonsense mexT gene (in PAO1-UW) to the sense open reading frame (like in PAO7H and PA14). In two strains (4088 and 4177), the MexT amino acid sequence was found to exhibit mutations (G257S and R166H compared with PAO7H, respectively), which were not predicted by the SIFT algorithm (http://sift.jcvi.org/www/SIFT_BLink_submit.html) to affect the protein's function.

All the 10 nfxC mutants appeared to express the mexT gene 2- to 5-fold less than PAO1-UW or PAO7H (Table 4), which cannot account for mexEF-oprN upregulation, since the protein MexT basically acts as an activator (31). More interestingly, two strains (4088 and 4099) exhibited a mexT-proximal G156A mutation in nod box 2. This mutation is located in the conserved DNA motif ATCA(N5)GTCGTA(N4)ACYAT predicted in silico to be a regulatory region of P. aeruginosa genes whose expression is induced by MexT (57).

Role of MexS in MexEF-OprN upregulation.

Sequence analysis of the mexS gene predicted a D249N substitution in protein MexS in all of our nfxC mutants compared with the PAO1-UW sequence (Table 4). However, this amino acid variation, which also occurs in wild-type strain PA14, was found in seven drug-susceptible environmental strains of P. aeruginosa from our laboratory collection (data not shown). More interestingly, 5 of 10 nfxC mutants exhibited additional amino acid changes in MexS (Table 4). The A175V, E181D, and V308I substitutions in strain 4198 were also identified in the multidrug resistant isolate PA7 (http://www.pseudomonas.com). To evaluate the impact of these different sequence variations on MexEF-OprN expression, we tried to complement the mutants with a plasmid-borne mexS gene from strain PAO1-UW (Table 5). Plasmid pMEQR1 was successfully transferred into strains 40.1, 93.1, 3936, 3974, 4099, and 4198. In 40.1, 93.1, 3936 (which harbors a wild-type mexS gene), and 4099, the wild-type susceptibility to fluoroquinolones was partially restored and the mexE mRNA levels decreased about 6-fold upon complementation (Table 5). Futhermore, 93.1 and 3936 displayed a 2-fold increase in resistance to specific substrates of the MexXY/OprM (tobramycin, amikacin, apramycin) and MexAB-OprM pumps (ticarcillin, aztreonam). In 40.1 and 4099, the gain in resistance was limited to aminoglycosides. Contrasting with these results, transfer of plasmid pMEQR1 had virtually no effect on the resistance profiles and mexE levels of isolates 3974 and 4198. Note that for unclear reasons, pMEQR1 was unable to influence the bacterial resistance to carbapenems except in strain 3936.

Table 5.

Complementation of the MexEF-OprN overproducers with the mexS genea

Strain MIC (μg/ml)
mexE gene expresssion level
CIP LVX TOB AMK APR FEP TIC CAZ ATM IMP MEM
40.1 (pME6001) 0.5 2 1 4 8 1 8 1 2 4 1 2,115
40.1 (pMEQR1) 0.25 1 2 8 16 1 8 1 2 4 1 420
93.1 (pME6001) 1 4 1 4 8 16 64 32 16 4 2 1,912
93.1 (pMEQR1) 0.25 1 2 8 16 32 128 64 32 4 2 290
3936 (pME6001) 2 4 2 2 8 0.5 4 1 1 4 0.5 2,301
3936 (pMEQR1) 0.5 1 2 4 16 1 8 1 2 2 0.25 469
3974 (pME6001) 1 4 2 8 16 8 64 4 16 4 4 94
3974 (pMEQR1) 1 4 2 8 16 8 64 4 16 4 4 81
4099 (pME6001) 0.5 1 0.5 1 4 1 8 0.5 2 4 0.5 1,653
4099 (pMEQR1) 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 1 8 0.5 2 4 0.5 240
4198 (pME6001) 2 4 1 1 4 1 8 1 2 4 1 2,084
4198 (pMEQR1) 2 4 1 1 4 1 8 1 2 4 1 2,192
a

Values in boldface indicate that complementation with the mexS gene succeeded in restoring the susceptibility to fluoroquinolones. CIP, ciprofloxacin; LVX, levofloxacin; TOB, tobramycin; AMK, amikacin; APR, apramycin; FEP, cefepime; TIC, ticarcillin; CAZ, ceftazidime; ATM, aztreonam; IMP, imipenem; MEM, meropenem.

Mutations in MvaT.

One nfxC mutant (4099) appeared to harbor an inactive mvaT gene because of a frameshifting deletion while another mutant (4198) contained a A115T substitution in the MvaT protein, which was predicted to be tolerated by the SIFT algorithm (Table 4). As indicated in Table 5, overexpression of the wild-type mexS gene from pMEQR1 allowed the partial recovery of wild-type susceptibility in 4099, thus overriding the possible effect of the inactivated mvaT gene on mexEF-oprN expression.

Selection of MexEF-OprN mutants by ciprofloxacin.

As shown above, activation of drug extrusion mechanisms constitutes a very common way of allowing P. aeruginosa to achieve low-level resistance to fluoroquinolones. An important clinical issue is to know whether these first-step mutants are more prone to generate highly resistant bacteria than wild-type strains when exposed to these agents in vivo (3). To test this hypothesis, we first compared the ability of 10 wild-type strains (MIC of ciprofloxacin, 0.12 μg/ml) and 10 efflux pump overproducers (MIC, 0.5 μg/ml) to give rise to mutants able to grow on ciprofloxacin 2 μg/ml. Mutation frequencies ranging from 10−10 to 10−8 were observed in both cases, suggesting a weak impact of preexisting efflux mechanisms on the emergence of more highly resistant P. aeruginosa (mean mutation frequencies of 3.1 × 10−9 for wild-type strains versus 4.4 × 10−9 for efflux overproducers) (Table 6). Of note, two strains (3994 and 4070) exhibiting relatively high mutation frequencies were isolated from chronic infections, as noted previously (21). Growth on ciprofloxacin (2 μg/ml) selected MexEF-OprN gain-of-efflux mutants in 8 of 10 wild-type strains, regardless of the growth conditions (exponential or stationary phase). One strain (SCH1) exhibited a substitution in GyrA in addition to MexEF-OprN-mediated efflux. Starting with efflux pump-overproducing mutants, growth on 2 μg/ml ciprofloxacin led mainly to the recovery of mutants coexpressing simultaneously two or three Mex systems (Table 6). Again, most of these secondary mutants (6 of 10) were of the nfxC type, but the emergence of alterations in QRDRs was higher than in the wild-type population (8 mutants versus 2), especially when the mutants were selected from stationary-phase bacteria (6 of 10 strains). Emergence of both drug target alterations and additional drug efflux mechanisms was observed for strains 32.1 and 4016, indicating an accumulation of independent mutational events during the selection. The MexEF-OprN-overproducing strain 4177 was the only one able to increase its resistance to ciprofloxacin without the cooperation of other known mechanisms (Table 6). In the 4177-derived mutants (MIC of ciprofloxacin, >2 μg/ml), the transcript levels of the mexE gene were ca. 5-fold higher than in the parental strain 4177 (MIC, 0.5 μg/ml). This further increase in mexEF-oprN expression was associated with a nucleotide change in the mexS gene leading to a C269Y substitution.

Table 6.

Analysis of mutants selected on ciprofloxacin, 2 μg/mla

Strain Background Exponentially growing cells
Stationary-phase cells
Mutation frequenciesb Additional resistance mechanisms CIP MIC (μg/ml) Mutation frequenciesb Additional resistance mechanisms CIP MIC (μg/ml)
Wild-type strains (CIP MICs, 0.12 μg/ml)
    PAO1 <2 × 10−10 <2 × 10−10
    PA14 1 × 2.10−8 EFN 4 3.5 × 10−8 EFN 4
    CIP76110 6.6 × 10−10 EFN 4 <2 × 10−10
    BOU1 1.0 × 10−9 EFN 4 4.6 × 10−9 EFN 4
    LAU1 9.3 × 10−9 EFN 4 4.0 × 10−10 EFN 8
    MAR1 1.3 × 10−10 CDJ 4 <2 × 10−10
    PUB1 1.2 × 10−9 Unknown 4 4.2 × 10−8 Unknown 8
    SCL1 4.2 × 10−9 EFN 4 2.7 × 10−8 EFN 4
    SCH1 1.6 × 10−9 EFN 4 4.2 × 10−9 EFN + T83I (GyrA) 16
EFN + D87N (GyrA) 8
    VIT1 1.6 × 10−9 EFN 4 8.0 × 10−10 EFN 4
Efflux overproducers (CIP MICs, 0.5 μg/ml)
    32.1 ABM 3.3 × 10−10 EFN 4 4.0 × 10−10 EFN + D87Y (GyrA) 16
    37.1 ABM + XY 2.6 × 10−9 EFN 4 4.0 × 10−10 EFN 4
    40.1 EFN 1.3 × 10−10 T83I (GyrA) 8 6.0 × 10−10 S466Y (GyrB) 6
    43.1 XY 1.2 × 10−9 EFN 4 4.8 × 10−9 T83I (GyrA) 8
    3994 ABM + XY 1.7 × 10−8 CDJc 4 1.4 × 10−8 EFNc 4
EFNc 4
    4016 XY 3.4 × 10−9 CDJ 4 3.4 × 10−9 T83I (GyrA) 8
ABM + D87Y (GyrA) 8
    4070 CDJ 7.2 × 10−9 EFN 4 2.0 × 10−10 EFN 4
    4173 XY 6.6 × 10−10 EFN 4 8.0 × 10−10 T83I (GyrA) 16
    4175 ABM <2 × 10−10 6.0 × 10−10 T83I (GyrA) 8
    4177 EFN 1.1 × 10−8 Nod 4 3.9 × 10−9 Nod 4
a

CIP, ciprofloxacin; ABM, MexAB-OprM; CDJ, MexCD-OprJ; EFN, MexEF-OprN; XY, MexXY(OprM). Mutations in the QRDR regions are underlined.

b

Calculated from an initial inoculum of 5 × 109 bacteria (experiments performed in triplicate). The value <2 × 10−10 indicates that no colonies were obtained on selective plates.

c

In these mutants, the mexXY operon was no longer overexpressed.

d

No additional mechanism.

With 4 μg/ml ciprofloxacin (Table 7), only 3 of 10 wild-type strains and 6 of 10 efflux overproducers gave rise to more resistant mutants (mean mutation frequency of 8.4 × 10−10). While efflux mechanisms were systematically selected from exponentially growing cells, thus increasing the MICs of ciprofloxacin to 8 μg/ml, only QRDR mutants arose from stationary-phase cells, resulting in MICs of up to 32 μg/ml. Interestingly, in both situations, two mechanisms were needed to grow on such a high concentration of ciprofloxacin.

Table 7.

Analysis of mutants selected on ciprofloxacin, 4 μg/mla

Strain Background Exponentially growing cells
Stationary-phase cells
Mutation frequenciesb Additional resistance mechanisms CIP MIC (μg/ml) Mutation frequenciesb Additional resistance mechanisms CIP MIC (μg/ml)
Wild-type strains (CIP MICs, 0.12 μg/ml)
    PAO1 <2 × 10−10 <2 × 10−10
    PA14 3.5 × 10−10 EFN + XY 8 <2 × 10−10
    CIP76110 <2 × 10−10 2 × 10−10 EFN + T83I (GyrA) 8
    BOU1 <2 × 10−10 <2 × 10−10
    LAU1 <2 × 10−10 <2 × 10−10
    MAR1 <2 × 10−10 <2 × 10−10
    PUB1 <2 × 10−10 <2 × 10−10
    SCL1 <2 × 10−10 <2 × 10−10
    SCH1 <2 × 10−10 4 × 10−10 EFN + T83I (GyrA) 16
    VIT1 <2 × 10−10 <2 × 10−10
Efflux overproducers (CIP MICs, 0.5 μg/ml)
    32.1 ABM <2 × 10−10 <2 × 10−10
    37.1 ABM + XY <2 × 10−10 2 × 10−10 T83I (GyrA) 16
    40.1 EFN <2 × 10−10 2 × 10−10 T83I (GyrA) 32
    43.1 XY 1.8 × 10−9 EFN 8 2 × 10−10 T83I (GyrA) 8
    3994 ABM + XY 2.3 × 10−9 EFN 8 <2 × 10−10
    4016 XY <2 × 10−10 1.8 × 10−9 T83I (GyrA) 16
    4070 CDJ <2 × 10−10 <2 × 10−10
    4173 XY <2 × 10−10 <2 × 10−10
    4175 ABM <2 × 10−10 <2 × 10−10
    4177 EFN 9.3 × 10−10 Noc 8 <2 × 10−10
a

CIP, ciprofloxacin; ABM, MexAB-OprM; CDJ, MexCD-OprJ; EFN, MexEF-OprN; XY, MexXY(OprM). Mutations in the QRDR regions are underlined.

b

Calculated from an initial inoculum of 5 × 109 bacteria (experiments performed in triplicate). The value <2 × 10−10 indicates that no colonies were obtained on selective plates.

c

No additional mechanism.

DISCUSSION

This work shows that a number of strains considered susceptible to ciprofloxacin with respect to the CLSI breakpoints (≤1 μg/ml) actually express one or several low-level resistance mechanisms to fluoroquinolones. According to some pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies, MICs of 0.25 and 0.5 μg/ml would be sufficient to impair the therapeutic efficacy of ciprofloxacin (11). For the first time, we demonstrate that in addition to MexAB-OprM and MexXY/OprM, the MexEF-OprN efflux pump contributes significantly to this low-level resistance in non-CF clinical strains of P. aeruginosa. Previous studies of nfxC mutants selected in vitro from various PAO1 sublines have shown that alterations in the mexT, mexS, or mvaT gene may result in MexEF-OprN overproduction (34, 53, 61). All of the clinical nfxC mutants reported here turned out to harbor a mexT gene lacking the frameshifting 8-bp insert found in PAO1-UW and a synonymous D249N change in the putative oxidoreductase MexS. To which extent the other amino acid variations found in MexT (strains 4088 and 4177), in MexS (strains 40.1, 93.1, 3974, 4099, and 4198), and/or in MvaT (strain 4198) may account for the nfxC resistance profile is still unclear. Indeed, overexpression of the mexS gene from plasmid pMEQR1 was sufficient by itself to partially restore a wild-type susceptibility to fluoroquinolones, β-lactams, and aminoglycosides in isolate 3936 that harbors wild-type mexT, mexS, and mvaT genes. Of note, none of these genes (except the mvaT gene in isolate 4099) appeared to be disrupted by frameshift deletions or insertions in the nfxC strains, as it is often the case for regulatory loci in mutants overproducing MexAB-OprM, MexXY/OprM, or MexCD-OprJ (36). Furthermore, according to previous data (61), disruption of the mvaT gene should result in supersusceptibility to carbapenems instead of resistance, as in 4099 (Table 4). Recently, sequencing analysis of in vitro-selected nfxC mutants from PAO1-UW allowed us to identify of a P19S change in regulator MexT as a cause of mexEF-oprN overexpression and multidrug resistance (D. Fournier, unpublished data). The mutated position is located near the helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif (positions 26 to 38) of the DNA binding domain in MexT. In contrast, the G257S and R166H substitutions found in strains 4088 and 4177, respectively, map outside this HTH motif as well as outside the putative LysR substrate-binding domain of MexT (from amino acid 48 to 113). The regulation of MexEF-OprN expression thus appears much more complex than anticipated and requires further investigation.

nfxC mutants have rarely been reported in the clinical setting (45, 48), perhaps because of their impaired virulence/cytotoxicity or because they were underrecognized. Indeed, as noted here, the typical nfxC phenotype may be masked in some strains by additional resistance mechanisms involving efflux systems, β-lactamase production, and/or drug target alterations. The negative impact of nfxC mutations on bacterial virulence is complex, as it involves MexT-dependent and MexT-independent pathways (57). Our observation that three of our nfxC isolates were involved in bacteremic episodes is not sufficient by itself to rule out these findings, because susceptibility to pseudomonal infections depends primarily on the patient's condition (e.g., low leukocyte counts) (2). We are currently analyzing the virulence phenotype of the mutants identified in this study.

Our in vitro selection experiments demonstrate that when overproduced, MexEF-OprN allows P. aeruginosa to develop higher resistance levels to fluoroquinolones (MICs of ciprofloxacin, up to 8 μg/ml), either from wild-type bacteria or from first-step resistant mutants. Why nfxC mutants are selected at higher rates than nfxB mutants on ciprofloxacin is still unclear, as MexCD-OprJ tends to provide P. aeruginosa with higher resistance levels to this agent than MexEF-OprN (33). A trivial explanation could be that in addition to its role in drug efflux, MexEF-OprN may alleviate the oxidative stress induced by ciprofloxacin (12). In support of this hypothesis, MexEF-OprN expression is activated by the nitrosative (13) or oxidative stress (15, 29). In stationary-phase cells, the SOS response triggered by fluoroquinolones may incidentally increase the mutation rates in QRDRs and thus antibiotic resistance levels (50).

In conclusion, the prevalence of nfxC mutants has probably been underestimated in non-cystic fibrosis patients. As indicated in Table 3, the clinical nfxC mutants were found to exhibit a resistance range to ciprofloxacin similar to that of the MexAB-OprM or MexXY/OprM surexpressors. According to this, such nfxC mutants are not expected to have a selective advantage over the other Mex mutants in patients under treatment. On the other hand, our in vitro-selected nfxC mutants appeared to be much more resistant than the nfxC clinical strains (MIC of 4 to 8 μg/ml versus 0.5 to 2 μg/ml) (Tables 6 and 7). A plausible explanation could be that different nfxC mutations may result in different resistance levels to ciprofloxacin. Whether these different hypothetical mutations may have the same impact on the virulence of P. aeruginosa warrants further studies, since it is possible that some mutants are not clinically relevant.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 12 September 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Akasaka T., Tanaka M., Yamaguchi A., Sato K. 2001. Type II topoisomerase mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in 1998 and 1999: role of target enzyme in mechanism of fluoroquinolone resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2263–2268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Baltch A. L. 1994. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia, p. 73–128.In Baltch A. L., Smith R. P. (ed.), Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections and treatment. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Baquero F. 2001. Low-level antibacterial resistance: a gateway to clinical resistance. Drug Resist Updat. 4:93–105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Blumer C., Heeb S., Pessi G., Haas D. 1999. Global GacA-steered control of cyanide and exoprotease production in Pseudomonas fluorescens involves specific ribosome binding sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:14073–14078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Cattoir V., Poirel L., Rotimi V., Soussy C. J., Nordmann P. 2007. Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance qnr genes in ESBL-producing enterobacterial isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60:394–397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 7th ed., vol. 26. M7-A7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 18th informational supplement, vol. 27. M100-S18. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Diggle S. P., Winzer K., Lazdunski A., Williams P., Camara M. 2002. Advancing the quorum in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: MvaT and the regulation of N-acylhomoserine lactone production and virulence gene expression. J. Bacteriol. 184:2576–2586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Drlica K., Malik M., Kerns R. J., Zhao X. 2008. Quinolone-mediated bacterial death. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:385–392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Dumas J. L., van Delden C., Perron K., Kohler T. 2006. Analysis of antibiotic resistance gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by quantitative real-time-PCR. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 254:217–225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Dupont P., Hocquet D., Jeannot K., Chavanet P., Plésiat P. 2005. Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities of eight fluoroquinolones against MexAB-OprM-overproducing clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55:518–522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Dwyer D. J., Kohanski M. A., Hayete B., Collins J. J. 2007. Gyrase inhibitors induce an oxidative damage cellular death pathway in Escherichia coli. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3:91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Fetar H., et al. 2011. mexEF-oprN multidrug efflux operon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: regulation by the MexT activator in response to nitrosative stress and chloramphenicol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:508–514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Friedman S. M., Lu T., Drlica K. 2001. Mutation in the DNA gyrase A gene of Escherichia coli that expands the quinolone resistance-determining region. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2378–2380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Frisk A., et al. 2004. Transcriptome analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa after interaction with human airway epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 72:5433–5438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Fukuda H., Hosaka M., Hirai K., Iyobe S. 1990. New norfloxacin resistance gene in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:1757–1761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Griffith D. C., et al. 2006. Pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with reduced susceptibility due to different efflux pumps: do elevated MICs always predict reduced in vivo efficacy? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1628–1632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hamzehpour M. M., Pechère J. C., Plésiat P., Kohler T. 1995. OprK and OprM define two genetically distinct multidrug efflux systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2392–2396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hansen G. T., Zhao X., Drlica K., Blondeau J. M. 2006. Mutant prevention concentration for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 27:120–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. He G. X., et al. 2004. An H+-coupled multidrug efflux pump, PmpM, a member of the MATE family of transporters, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 186:262–265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Henrichfreise B., Wiegand I., Pfister W., Wiedemann B. 2007. Resistance mechanisms of multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from Germany and correlation with hypermutation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:4062–4070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hocquet D., Bertrand X., Kohler T., Talon D., Plésiat P. 2003. Genetic and phenotypic variations of a resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic clone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1887–1894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hocquet D., Nordmann P., El Garch F., Cabanne L., Plésiat P. 2006. Involvement of the MexXY-OprM efflux system in emergence of cefepime resistance in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1347–1351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Hocquet D., Roussel-Delvallez M., Cavallo J. D., Plésiat P. 2007. MexAB-OprM- and MexXY-overproducing mutants are very prevalent among clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with reduced susceptibility to ticarcillin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:1582–1583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Jalal S., Ciofu O., Hoiby N., Gotoh N., Wretlind B. 2000. Molecular mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:710–712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Jeannot K., et al. 2008. Resistance and virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains overproducing the MexCD-OprJ efflux pump. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:2455–2462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Jeannot K., Sobel M. L., El Garch F., Poole K., Plésiat P. 2005. Induction of the MexXY efflux pump in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is dependent on drug-ribosome interaction. J. Bacteriol. 187:5341–5346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Jin Y., Yang H., Qiao M., Jin S. 2011. MexT regulates the type III secretion system through MexS and PtrC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 193:399–410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Juhas M., et al. 2004. Global regulation of quorum sensing and virulence by VqsR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology 150:831–841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Keen N. T., Tamaki S., Kobayashi D., Trollinger D. 1988. Improved broad-host-range plasmids for DNA cloning in gram-negative bacteria. Gene 70:191–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kohler T., Epp S. F., Curty L. K., Pechère J. C. 1999. Characterization of MexT, the regulator of the MexE-MexF-OprN multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 181:6300–6305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Kohler T., et al. 1997. Characterization of MexE-MexF-OprN, a positively regulated multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 23:345–354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kohler T., Michea-Hamzehpour M., Plésiat P., Kahr A. L., Pechère J. C. 1997. Differential selection of multidrug efflux systems by quinolones in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2540–2543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kohler T., van Delden C., Curty L. K., Hamzehpour M. M., Pechère J. C. 2001. Overexpression of the MexEF-OprN multidrug efflux system affects cell-to-cell signaling in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 183:5213–5222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Li Y., et al. 2003. A new member of the tripartite multidrug efflux pumps, MexVW-OprM, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:572–575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Lister P. D., Wolter D. J., Hanson N. D. 2009. Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 22:582–610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Llanes C., et al. 2004. Clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa overproducing MexAB-OprM and MexXY efflux pumps simultaneously. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1797–1802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Masecar B. L., Celesk R. A., Robillard N. J. 1990. Analysis of acquired ciprofloxacin resistance in a clinical strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:281–286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Maseda H., Saito K., Nakajima A., Nakae T. 2000. Variation of the mexT gene, a regulator of the MexEF-OprN efflux pump expression in wild-type strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 192:107–112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Maseda H., et al. 2004. Enhancement of the mexAB-oprM efflux pump expression by a quorum-sensing autoinducer and its cancellation by a regulator, MexT, of the mexEF-oprN efflux pump operon in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1320–1328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Maseda H., Uwate M., Nakae T. 2010. Transcriptional regulation of the mexEF-oprN multidrug efflux pump operon by MexT and an unidentified repressor in nfxC-type mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 311:36–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Masuda N., et al. 2000. Substrate specificities of MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-oprM efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3322–3327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Mima T., Sekiya H., Mizushima T., Kuroda T., Tsuchiya T. 2005. Gene cloning and properties of the RND-type multidrug efflux pumps MexPQ-OpmE and MexMN-OprM from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Immunol. 49:999–1002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Mouneimne H., Robert J., Jarlier V., Cambau E. 1999. Type II topoisomerase mutations in ciprofloxacin-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:62–66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Oh H., Stenhoff J., Jalal S., Wretlind B. 2003. Role of efflux pumps and mutations in genes for topoisomerases II and IV in fluoroquinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Microb. Drug Resist. 9:323–328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Perron K., et al. 2004. CzcR-CzcS, a two-component system involved in heavy metal and carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Biol. Chem. 279:8761–8768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Poole K. 2000. Efflux-mediated resistance to fluoroquinolones in gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2233–2241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Pumbwe L., Piddock L. J. 2000. Two efflux systems expressed simultaneously in multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2861–2864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Rejiba S., Aubry A., Petitfrere S., Jarlier V., Cambau E. 2008. Contribution of ParE mutation and efflux to ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. J. Chemother. 20:749–752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Riesenfeld C., Everett M., Piddock L. J., Hall B. G. 1997. Adaptive mutations produce resistance to ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2059–2060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Sekiya H., et al. 2003. Functional cloning and characterization of a multidrug efflux pump, MexHI-OpmD, from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:2990–2992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Reference deleted.
  • 53. Sobel M. L., Neshat S., Poole K. 2005. Mutations in PA2491 (mexS) promote MexT-dependent mexEF-oprN expression and multidrug resistance in a clinical strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 187:1246–1253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Soler C. P., Gidenne S., Saint-Blancard P., Kerleguer A., Gerome P. 2004. Recovery method of serotypable character in non serotypable Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 52:33–38(In French.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Stover C. K., et al. 2000. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 406:959–964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Szczepanowski R., et al. 2004. Antibiotic multiresistance plasmid pRSB101 isolated from a wastewater treatment plant is related to plasmids residing in phytopathogenic bacteria and carries eight different resistance determinants including a multidrug transport system. Microbiology 150:3613–3630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Tian Z. X., et al. 2009. MexT modulates virulence determinants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa independent of the MexEF-OprN efflux pump. Microb. Pathog. 47:237–241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Vettoretti L., et al. 2009. Efflux unbalance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:1987–1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Vieira J., Messing J. 1987. Production of single-stranded plasmid DNA. Methods Enzymol. 153:3–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Vogne C., Aires J. R., Bailly C., Hocquet D., Plésiat P. 2004. Role of the multidrug efflux system MexXY in the emergence of moderate resistance to aminoglycosides among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1676–1680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Westfall L. W., et al. 2006. mvaT mutation modifies the expression of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa multidrug efflux operon mexEF-oprN. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 255:247–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Wiehlmann L., et al. 2007. Population structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:8101–8106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Yang L., Chen L., Shen L., Surette M., Duan K. 2011. Inactivation of MuxABC-OpmB transporter system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa leads to increased ampicillin and carbenicillin resistance and decreased virulence. J. Microbiol. 49:107–114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Zhang L., Li X. Z., Poole K. 2001. Fluoroquinolone susceptibilities of efflux-mediated multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Burkholderia cepacia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48:549–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES