Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2011 Dec;193(24):7001–7002. doi: 10.1128/JB.06267-11

Complete Genome Sequence of the Aerobic Marine Methanotroph Methylomonas methanica MC09

Rich Boden 1,*, Michael Cunliffe 1,, Julie Scanlan 1, Hélène Moussard 1, K Dimitri Kits 2, Martin G Klotz 3, Mike S M Jetten 4, Stéphane Vuilleumier 5, James Han 6, Lin Peters 6, Natalia Mikhailova 6, Hazuki Teshima 7, Roxanne Tapia 6,7, Nikos Kyrpides 6, Natalia Ivanova 6, Ioanna Pagani 6, Jan-Fang Cheng 6, Lynne Goodwin 7, Cliff Han 6,7, Loren Hauser 6,8, Miriam L Land 6,8, Alla Lapidus 6, Susan Lucas 6, Sam Pitluck 6, Tanja Woyke 6, Lisa Stein 2, J Colin Murrell 1
PMCID: PMC3232845  PMID: 22123758

Abstract

Methylomonas methanica MC09 is a mesophilic, halotolerant, aerobic, methanotrophic member of the Gammaproteobacteria, isolated from coastal seawater. Here we present the complete genome sequence of this strain, the first available from an aerobic marine methanotroph.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Methylomonas methanica (11, 21) is one of four recognized species within the genus Methylomonas in the Gammaproteobacteria, which includes M. aurantiaca (3, 12), M. fodinarum (3, 12), and M. scandinavica (13, 14). Several other Methylomonas species without validly published names have also been described, including “M. clara” (8) and “M. rubra” (18). All members of the genus use methane as the sole carbon and energy source. The majority of known strains were obtained from terrestrial environments; however, M. methanica MC09 was isolated from a methane enrichment culture inoculated with seawater obtained from the coast of Penarth, United Kingdom (lat 51.43, long −3.17) (M. Cunliffe and J. C. Murrell, unpublished data). Methylomonas spp. are prevalent in various marine and estuarine environments (5, 9, 16, 19, 20). The complete genome sequence of M. methanica MC09 is the first available for a marine methanotroph, providing insights into methane cycling in marine environments.

The genome (5.05 Mbp) of M. methanica MC09 was assembled using VELVET (22) and Newbler from an Illumina GAii (2) shotgun library (74,177,086 reads; 2.67 Gbp) and 454 Titanium (15) standard (215,708 reads) and paired-end (154 Mbp) libraries representing 24.3× coverage. Gaps were closed by PCR and Bubble PCR primer walks (350 reactions and 1 shatter library) using Consed (7). The genome is a single circular replicon with 4,494 candidate protein-encoding genes, as predicted by Prodigal (10) and GenePrimp (17). The mean GC content of the sequence was 51.3 mol%. Synthetic pathways for tRNAs of all 20 structural amino acids were accounted for, along with a single rRNA operon. Three terminal oxidases were predicted: aa3, o-quinol, and bd-quinol.

All genes for the 2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate (KDPG) aldolase variant of the ribulose monophosphate (RuMP) pathway of formaldehyde fixation were predicted, consistent with experimental data for Methylomonas spp. (1). All genes of the pentose phosphate and Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathways were predicted. Genes for all enzymes of Krebs' cycle, with the exception of fumarase, were predicted. Genes for RubisCO were not found. The mxaFJGIRSACKLDEK cluster encoding methanol dehydrogenase was predicted, along with the cluster pqqBCDE for biosynthesis of the cofactor pyrroloquinoline quinone. Both particulate (pmoCAB) and soluble (mmoXYBZDCGR) methane monooxygenases were predicted. Acetate kinase and acetyl coenzyme A synthase were predicted, potentially allowing C2-compound assimilation.

All genes required for dinitrogen fixation were predicted, as were those for nitrate/nitrite transport (nasFED), ammonification (nasCA, nasB, and nirBD), direct ammonium uptake (amtB), and nitrogen assimilation (glnA, gltB, and ald). Urea metabolism genes were predicted (carbamoyl phosphate synthase, carA and carB; urease, ureABC); however, neither a complete urea cycle (lacking the arginase gene) nor functional urease (lacking accessory genes) is present. Genes for nitrite reduction (nirS) and nitric oxide reduction (norB) were predicted. A gene encoding cytochrome P460 was predicted, indicating a potential for hydroxylamine detoxification (4, 6).

The information provided in the complete genome sequence of M. methanica MC09 will enable further studies of the metabolism of this and other methanotrophic bacteria. These data also provide the first overview of the metabolic diversity of a marine methanotroph.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The nucleotide sequence of the genome has been deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession no. CP002738.

Acknowledgments

The sequencing was carried out by the DOE Joint Genome Institute with support from their community sequencing program, and the genome is the first of a series of 18 genomes of methanotrophic Bacteria to be analyzed by the Organization for Methanotroph Genome Analysis (OMeGA). The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. L.S. was supported by a grant from the NSERC. M.G.K. was supported by incentive funds from the University of Louisville. M.C. and R.B. were supported by the NERC.

We thank Marina Kalyuzhnaya for helpful comments on the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Anthony C. 1982. The biochemistry of methylotrophs. Academic Press, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bennett S. 2004. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics 5: 433–438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bowman J. P., Sly L. I., Cox J. M., Hayward A. C. 1990. Methylomonas fodinarum sp. nov. and Methylomonas aurantiaca sp. nov.: two closely related type I obligate methanotrophs. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 13: 278–286 [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Campbell M. A., et al. 2011. Model of the molecular basis for hydroxylamine oxidation and nitrous oxide production in methanotrophic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 322: 82–89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Cunliffe M., et al. 2008. Phylogenetic and functional gene analysis of the bacterial and archaeal communities associated with the surface microlayer of an estuary. ISME J. 2: 776–789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Elmore B. O., Bergmann D. J., Klotz M. G., Hooper A. B. 2007. Cytochromes P460 and c′-β; a new family of high-spin cytochromes c. FEBS Lett. 581: 911–916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gordon D., Abajian C., Green P. 1998. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 8: 195–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hohenloser W., Lingens F., Präve P. 1978. Characterization of a new methylotrophic strain, Methylomonas clara. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 6: 167–179 [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Holmes A., Owens N. J. P., Murrell J. C. 1995. Detection of novel marine methanotrophs using phylogenetic and functional gene probes after methane enrichment. Microbiology 141:1947–1955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hyatt D., et al. 2010. Prodigal prokaryotic dynamic programming genefinding algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. International Journal of Systematic and Bacteriology 1984. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. List no. 15. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 34: 355–357 [Google Scholar]
  • 12. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1990. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. List no. 35. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 40: 470–471 [Google Scholar]
  • 13. International Journal of Systematic Evolutionary Microbiology 2000. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. List no. 74. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50: 949–950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kalyuzhnaya M. G., et al. 1999. Methylomonas scandinavica sp. nov., a new methanotrophic psychrotrophic bacterium isolated from deep igneous rock ground water of Sweden. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 22: 565–572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Margulies M., et al. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437: 376–380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. McDonald I. R., Smith K., Lidstrom M. E. 2005. Methanotrophic populations in estuarine sediment from Newport Bay, California. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 250: 287–293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Pati A., et al. 2010. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for microbial genomes. Nat. Methods 7: 455–457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Romanovskaya V. A., Rokitko P. V., Shilin S. O., Malashenko Y. R. 2006. Emended description of Methylomonas rubra sp. nov. Mikrobiologiia 75: 689–693 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sieburth J. M., Johnson P. W., Church V. M., Laux D. C. 1993. C1 bacteria in the water column of Chesapeake Bay, USA. 3. Immunological relationships of the type species of marine monomethylamine-oxidizing and methane-oxidizing bacteria to wild estuarine and oceanic cultures. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 95: 91–102 [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Upstill-Goddard R. C. 2006. Air-sea gas exchange in the coastal zone. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 70: 388–404 [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Whittenbury R., Krieg N. R. 1984. Family Methylococcaceae, p. 256–261 In Krieg N. R., Holt J. G. (ed.), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Zerbino D. R., Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18: 821–829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES