Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2011 Dec;49(12):4349–4351. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05017-11

DNA Microarray Genotyping and Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Profiling of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Isolates from Renal Patients

Sinead McNicholas 1, Anna C Shore 2, David C Coleman 2, Hilary Humphreys 1,3, Deirdre Fitzgerald Hughes 1,*
PMCID: PMC3232979  PMID: 21940465

Abstract

Thirty-six methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream isolates from renal patients were genetically characterized by DNA microarray analysis and spa typing. The isolates were highly clonal, belonging mainly to ST22-MRSA-IV. The immune evasion and enterotoxin gene clusters were found in 29/36 (80%) and 33/36 (92%) isolates, respectively.

TEXT

Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent cause of bloodstream infections (BSI) worldwide (2, 3, 17). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has accounted for 20 to 50% of S. aureus BSI in our hospital over the past 5 years (7). Renal patients are at greater risk of MRSA BSI due to impaired immune function, regular contact with health care facilities, and the presence of central venous catheters (CVCs). We investigated the virulence gene profiles of MRSA BSI isolates from renal patients by using DNA microarray analysis. The study was carried out in Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, an 820-bed tertiary referral center harboring the national referral center for renal and pancreatic transplantation and responsible for approximately 200 hemodialysis patients at any given time. Many studies have investigated the sources and outcomes of S. aureus bacteremia among renal patients; however, this is the first study, to our knowledge, to genetically characterize MRSA BSI isolates from renal patients (4, 8, 10).

MRSA BSI isolates from renal patients were prospectively collected from 2005 to 2009. Patient details were collected from European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) data and review of their medical notes. Genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Crawley, United Kingdom). spa typing, which involves PCR amplification and sequencing of the polymorphic 24-bp variable-number tandem-repeat region within the 3′ end of the protein A gene spa, was carried out according to methods described on the SeqNet website (http://www.seqnet.org). Sequencing was performed by Beckman Coulter Genomics (Takeley, United Kingdom) and Source BioScience (Dublin, Ireland). Genetic characterization of isolates was undertaken using the StaphyType kit (Alere Technologies, Germany) as previously described (12, 13). The StaphyType kit is a DNA microarray system that detects 334 S. aureus gene sequences, including those encoding (i) species markers (nuc, spa, coa, femA, gapA, sbi, and sarA), (ii) antimicrobial resistance genes (e.g., genes encoding resistance to β-lactams, macrolides, tetracyclines, lincosamides, streptogramins, aminoglycosides, and glycopeptides), (iii) genes encoding staphylococcal enterotoxins, toxic shock toxin, exfoliative toxins, Panton-Valentine leukocidin, the immune evasion complex (IEC; sak, chp, scn, sea, and sep), and the arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME), (iv) microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs), adhesion and biofilm genes (e.g., icaA, -C, and -D, cna, fnbA, fnbB, map, cna, ebh, and bbp), (v) SCC and SCCmec-associated genes and sequences, and (vi) capsule (types 1, 5, and 8) and agr (types I to IV) typing markers (13). The DNA microarray can also assign S. aureus isolates to multilocus sequence types and/or clonal complexes (CCs) (14).

Thirty-six MRSA BSI isolates recovered from renal patients (19 female, 17 male) were investigated. The median age was 68 years, and 28 patients (78%) were on hemodialysis. The sources of BSI are listed in Table 1. For the majority of patients (26/36; 72.2%), a CVC was the source of the BSI. Six patients (16.7%) developed a secondary focus of infection, and these are listed in Table 1. The majority of isolates belonged to ST22-MRSA-IV (27/36; 75%), consisting of nine spa types, with t032 predominating (12/27; 44.4%) (Table 2). Five isolates (5/36; 13.9%) were ST5-MRSA-II and spa type t463, three (3/36; 8.3%) were ST8, spa type t190, and harbored SCCmec IIE and ccrAB4 or a possible novel SCCmec II subtype, and 1 isolate belonged to ST30-MRSA-IV and spa type t1662.

Table 1.

Infection types in renal patients with MRSA BSI in the present study

Infection type No. (%) of isolates
Source of BSI
    Central venous catheter 26 (72.2)
    Skin and soft tissue infection 2 (5.6)
    Infected peripheral vascular catheter 2 (5.6)
    Infective endocarditis 1 (2.8)
    Surgical site infection 1 (2.8)
    Intra-abdominal infection 1 (2.8)
    Not identified 3 (8.3)
Secondary focus of infection
    Osteomyelitis 1 (2.8)
    Infective endocarditis 3 (8.3)
    Implantable cardiac rhythm device 2 (5.6)

Table 2.

Molecular characteristics of 36 MRSA bloodstream isolates recovered from renal patients between 2005 and 2009

ST SCCmec type (n) spa type(s) (n) agr/capsule types Antimicrobial resistance genesa Virulence-associated genesa MSCRAMM, adhesion, and biofilm genesa
22 IV (27) t025 (1), t032 (12), t515 (3), t557 (3), t1214 (3), t2945 (2), t3185 (1), t5420 (1), t7636 (1) I/5 erm(C) (21), lnu(A), aacA-aphD, aadD, mupA (1) seb (2), sec/l (16), egc, sak-chp-scn (22; IEC type B), ACME (1) bbp (25), cna, map, sdrC, sdrD (26), sasG
5 II (5) t463 (5) II/5 erm(A), aadD, tetefflux, fosB, merA, merB (1) tst, sed/j/r, egc, sea-sak-chp-scn (IEC type A) bbp, ebh, fib, fnbB, map, sdrC, sdrD, sasG
8 IIE and ccrAB4 (2), novel II subtype (1)b t190 (3) I/5 erm(A), tetefflux, fosB, qacA, aacA-aphD, aadD, aphA3-sat (2), merA, merB (2) sea-sak-scn (IEC type D) bbp, ebh, fib, fnbB (2), map (2), sdrD
30 IV (1) t1662 (1) III/8 Q6GD50 (fusC), tetefflux, fosB tst, egc, sak-chp-scn (IEC type B) bbp, cna, ebh, fib, map, sdrC, sdrD
a

The number of positive isolates is indicated in parentheses if not all isolates within a genotype were positive for the gene indicated. All isolates harbored the beta-lactamase resistance gene blaZ and the MSCRAMM, adhesion, and biofilm genes icaA, icaC and icaD, cl6fA and clfB, ebpS, eno, fnbA, and vwb.

b

Possible novel SCCmec II subtype identified in one ST8 MRSA isolate that yielded signals for class A mec complex ccrAB2 but lacked signals for kdp and aadD(pUB110).

All MRSA BSI isolates from renal patients recovered since 2008 belonged to ST22-MRSA-IV, whereas in the previous 3 years 81% had been found to belong to ST22-MRSA-IV, with the remainder consisting of several minor clones (Table 2). ST22-MRSA-IV is the predominant clone in Irish hospitals, accounting for 85% of MRSA BSI isolates in Ireland in 2009 (15). The enterotoxin gene cluster egc (seg, sei, sem, sen, seo, and seu) was found in all isolates except ST8 isolates (33/36; 92%). The toxic shock toxin gene (tst) was found in all ST5-MRSA-II and ST30-MRSA-IV isolates. The gene combination tst, sea, sed, sej, and ser was exclusive to ST5-MRSA-II isolates, and this ST carried more enterotoxin genes than the others. The sec/sel cluster was present in 16/27 (59.3%) ST22-MRSA-IV isolates but in no other STs. The IEC genes are important virulence factors of S. aureus (18). An IEC variant was detected in 80% of isolates (29/36), including 22/27 (81%) ST22-MRSA-IV, 1/3 (33.3%) ST8, and all ST5-MRSA-II and ST30-MRSA-IV isolates (Table 2).

We sought to determine the relationship between the genetic characteristics of the infecting isolate and the type of infection, infection complications, or clinical outcome. MRSA BSI with an ST22-MRSA-IV isolate was a cause of death in one patient. In six patients who developed a secondary focus of infection, the infecting isolates belonged to ST22-MRSA-IV (4/6; 66.6%) or ST5-MRSA-II (2/6; 33.3%). Development of a secondary focus of infection was not significantly associated with any particular ST; however, the highest rate of secondary infections involved ST5-MRSA-II (2/5 isolates; 40%), compared to ST22-MRSA-IV (4/27 isolates; 15%). This clone carried the most enterotoxin genes, including sea, and has been shown to be significantly associated with more severe S. aureus infection (1, 5, 6). Interestingly, the ST5-MRSA-II isolates harbored more antimicrobial resistance genes than ST22-MRSA-IV, but ST8 isolates harbored the greatest number of resistance genes (Table 2). The antibiotic resistance genes fosB and tetefflux were present in ST5-MRSA-II, ST8, and ST30 isolates. While nine of the MSCRAMM, adhesion, and biofilm genes investigated were detected in all isolates, only ST22-MRSA-IV and ST30-MRSA-IV isolates harbored the collagen binding adhesin gene cna and lacked the genes encoding the fibrinogen binding protein fib and the fibronectin binding protein fnbB (Table 2). ST22-MRSA-IV isolates also lacked the extracellular matrix binding protein ebh (Table 2).

Recent characterization of other S. aureus isolate collections indicated a strong clonal association of virulence genes, including the egc cluster and IEC variants (11, 16), and these correlations were also evident in the present study. The correlation between carriage of specific virulence genes and clinical outcome remains unclear, because host factors are also involved. For example, there are reports of a negative or positive correlation between egc gene carriage and infection severity in different isolate collections (5, 9), but how these genes limit or contribute to clinical complications is difficult to establish. Virulence gene expression may also affect the clinical outcome, but it is technically challenging to reliably determine gene expression that reflects the in vivo setting. The detailed characterization of virulence genes described here supports the clonal distribution of virulence-associated genes in a specific patient group with increased risk for multiple episodes of S. aureus infection. Although the small sample size excludes a statistically robust evaluation of the relationship between virulence gene carriage and clinical outcome, carriage of egc genes, at least, is apparently independent of the development of clinical complications in these patients.

In conclusion, this is the first report of MRSA BSI isolates in renal patients for which the isolates have been typed and characterized in detail with a DNA microarray. DNA microarray analysis is a useful, rapid, and convenient tool for more comprehensive analysis of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes in S. aureus.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 21 September 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Dauwalder O., et al. 2006. Comparative inflammatory properties of staphylococcal superantigenic enterotoxins SEA and SEG: implications for septic shock. J. Leukoc. Biol. 80:753–758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Diekema D. J., et al. 2003. Epidemiology and outcome of nosocomial and community-onset bloodstream infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:3655–3660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Diekema D. J., et al. 2001. Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997–1999. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32(Suppl. 2):S114–S132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Engemann J. J., et al. 2005. Clinical outcomes and costs due to Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia among patients receiving long-term hemodialysis. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 26:534–539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ferry T., et al. 2005. Comparative prevalence of superantigen genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates causing sepsis with and without septic shock. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41:771–777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fowler V. G., Jr., et al. 2007. Potential associations between hematogenous complications and bacterial genotype in Staphylococcus aureus infection. J. Infect. Dis. 196:738–747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Health Protection Surveillance Centre 2010. Enhanced EARS-Net surveillance report for 2010. Health Protection Surveillance Centre, Dublin, Ireland. http://www.hpsc.ie/hpsc/A-Z/MicrobiologyAntimicrobialResistance/EuropeanAntimicrobialResistanceSurveillanceSystemEARSS/EnhancedBacteraemiaSurveillance/PublicationsandPresentations/File,2291,en.pdf
  • 8. Inrig J. K., et al. 2006. Relationship between clinical outcomes and vascular access type among hemodialysis patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1:518–524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lalani T., et al. 2008. Associations between the genotypes of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream isolates and clinical characteristics and outcomes of bacteremic patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:2890–2896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Li Y., et al. 2009. Outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus infection in hemodialysis-dependent patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4:428–434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Monecke S., et al. 2011. A field guide to pandemic, epidemic and sporadic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 6:e17936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Monecke S., Ehricht R. 2005. Rapid genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates using miniaturised oligonucleotide arrays. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 11:825–833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Monecke S., Jatzwauk L., Weber S., Slickers P., Ehricht R. 2008. DNA microarray-based genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains from eastern Saxony. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14:534–545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Monecke S., Slickers P., Ehricht R. 2008. Assignment of Staphylococcus aureus isolates to clonal complexes based on microarray analysis and pattern recognition. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 53:237–251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. O'Connell B., Rossney A., Barry H. 2009. National Meticillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Reference Laboratory annual report, 2009. National MRSA Reference Laboratory, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. http://www.stjames.ie/Departments/DepartmentsA-Z/N/NationalMRSAReferenceLaboratory/DepartmentinDepth/AnnRpt2009.pdf
  • 16. van Belkum A., et al. 2006. Clonal distribution and differential occurrence of the enterotoxin gene cluster, egc, in carriage- versus bacteremia-associated isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:1555–1557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. van der Mee-Marquet N., Domelier A. S., Girard N., Quentin R. 2004. Epidemiology and typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bloodstream infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:5650–5657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. van Wamel W. J., Rooijakkers S. H., Ruyken M., van Kessel K. P., van Strijp J. A. 2006. The innate immune modulators staphylococcal complement inhibitor and chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus are located on beta-hemolysin-converting bacteriophages. J. Bacteriol. 188:1310–1315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES