Abstract
Prions are composed mainly, if not entirely, of PrPSc, an infectious misfolded isoform of PrPC, the normal isoform of the prion protein. Here we show that protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA)-generated hypertransmissible mink encephalopathy (HY TME) PrPSc is highly infectious and has a titer that is similar, if not identical, to that associated with brain tissue from animals infected with the HY TME agent that are in the terminal stage of disease. These data demonstrate that PMCA efficiently replicates the prion agent and provide further support for the hypothesis that in vitro-generated prions are bona fide and are not due to contamination.
TEXT
Prion diseases are fatal neurodegenerative disorders that affect mammals, including humans. One of these, chronic wasting disease (CWD), is an emerging prion disease of cervids in North America (34). CWD has a poorly defined host range and poses an unknown risk of zoonotic transmission to humans (3, 19, 24, 29, 31, 38). During the disease process, PrPC, the normal isoform of the prion protein, is posttranslationally converted to PrPSc (8, 11). Several lines of evidence now indicate that PrPSc is the etiological agent of prion diseases (10, 12, 22, 27, 35). The neuropathology of the prion diseases is characterized by spongiform degeneration, reactive gliosis, and the deposition of PrPSc (17).
Animals inoculated with in vitro-generated PrPSc develop prion disease. The ability to produce prions in vitro is compelling evidence that prions are not caused by a virus and are indeed caused by PrPSc (13). The incubation periods of disease differ in animals inoculated with in vitro-generated PrPSc (9, 10, 12, 21, 22, 33). While the reason for this variation is not known, one possibility is that differences in the titers produced by the various methodologies used to generate PrPSc account for the observed differences in incubation periods.
There is an inverse relationship between the incubation period of disease and the titer of the prion inoculum. Inoculation of animals with a decreasing titer of the agent results in a corresponding increase in the incubation period (23). This robust and highly reproducible relationship is the basis of the incubation interval assay (28). However, this relationship is not an absolutely foolproof means to estimate titer, as attempts to inactivate the agent with heat or chemical treatment have resulted in a longer incubation period of disease than would have been predicted from the titer (14, 39). The mechanism responsible for alterations in the relationship between incubation period and titer is not known.
We have previously demonstrated that protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA)-generated hypertransmissible (HY) PrPSc caused disease at 83 ± 3 days postinfection compared to 61 ± 3 days for the brain-derived HY transmissible mink encephalopathy (HY TME) agent, suggesting that the PMCA samples contained a high titer of HY TME agent (33). To investigate whether the short incubation period seen with animals inoculated with PMCA-generated HY TME agent corresponded to a high titer, we performed an endpoint dilution analysis of both brain-derived and PMCA-generated HY TME agents. The serial PMCA reaction mixtures initially seeded with HY TME agent or mock brain homogenate were produced as described previously (33). The 10th serial round of HY TME agent- or mock-seeded PMCA reactions was used for bioassay analysis, since the dilution of the initial HY TME agent seed was beyond the limit of detection by bioassay (5, 6). Therefore, the prion titer of these samples should have been solely due to in vitro generation of the HY TME agent. Ten-fold serial dilutions of either brain-derived or PMCA-generated HY TME agent were prepared in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) as described previously (18). Each inoculum was intracerebrally (i.c.) inoculated into groups of Syrian hamsters (n = 5) that were monitored for clinical signs of prion disease 3 days per week until day 400 postinfection, when the experiment was terminated. In animals that developed clinical signs of prion disease, the clinical diagnosis was confirmed by the presence of proteinase K (PK)-resistant PrP (PrPSc) in the central nervous system (CNS) as detected by Western blot analysis (Fig. 1). Specifically, brain homogenate was digested with PK at 100 μg/ml for 60 min at 37°C, 250-μg equivalents were size fractionated using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and PrPSc was detected using 3F4 antibody as previously described (1). We found that the animals that developed clinical signs of prion disease harbored PrPSc in the CNS (Table 1; Fig. 1, lanes 3 to 7). Conversely, the animals that did not develop clinical disease did not show detectable levels of PrPSc in the CNS (Table 1; Fig. 1, lanes 8 to 10). The neuropathological features of the animals that developed clinical disease were consistent with prion infection and included spongiform degeneration, deposition of PrPSc, and reactive astrocytosis (Fig. 2, panels A, B, and C). Animals inoculated with PMCA reaction mixtures from the 10th serial round that were seeded with an uninfected brain homogenate (mock seeded) failed to develop disease by day 400 postinfection, and we did not detect PrPSc in the CNS or prion-associated neuropathology (Table 1; Fig. 1, lane 11; Fig. 2, panels D, E, and F). Using the method of Reed and Muench (30), the HY TME agent-infected brain homogenate contained a titer of 109.3 i.c. LD50/g, while the PMCA reaction mixtures that were initially seeded with the same HY TME agent-infected brain homogenate contained a titer of 108.5 i.c. 50% lethal dose (LD50)/g (Table 1). These data indicate that, per gram, the PMCA-generated HY TME agent is 0.8 log units less infectious than the HY TME agent-infected brain homogenate used to initially seed the PMCA reaction mixtures.
Fig. 1.
Western blot detection of PrPSc in brain tissue from hamsters inoculated with serial dilutions of PMCA-generated HY TME agent corresponds to clinical diagnosis of disease. Hamsters were inoculated with the Drowsy (DY) TME agent, the HY TME agent, or serial 10-fold dilutions of PMCA reaction mixtures seeded with HY TME agent- or mock (UN)-infected brain homogenate. Western blot analysis of proteinase K-digested brain homogenate indicated that animals that developed clinical signs of prion infection contained PrPSc. The migration of the 19- and 21-kDa unglycosylated polypeptides is indicated on the left of the panel.
Table 1.
Response of hamsters to brain-derived or PMCA-generated HY TME agent
| Dilution | Result for indicated inoculuma |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMCA generated |
Brain derived |
|||
| Incubation period (days ± SEM) | No. of hamsters affected/total no. inoculated | Incubation period | No. of hamsters affected/total no. inoculated | |
| 10−2 | 83 ± 3b | 5/5 | 61 ± 3 | 5/5 |
| 10−3 | 93 ± 3 | 5/5 | 71 ± 3 | 5/5 |
| 10−4 | 99 ± 4 | 5/5 | 79 ± 9 | 5/5 |
| 10−5 | 164 ± 111 | 5/5 | 89 ± 6 | 5/5 |
| 10−6 | 186 ± 24 | 5/5 | 98 ± 2b | 5/5 |
| 10−7 | 214 ± 11 | 3/5 | 134 ± 9b | 4/5 |
| 10−8 | >400 | 0/5 | 192 ± 54b | 3/5 |
| 10−9 | >400 | 0/5 | >400b | 0/5 |
| None (mock inoculation) | >400 | 0/5 | >400 | 0/5 |
Fig. 2.
The neuropathological features of animals inoculated with PMCA-generated HY TME agent are consistent with prion infection. Hamsters were inoculated with PMCA reaction mixtures seeded with brain homogenate from either HY TME agent (A to C)- or mock (D to F)-infected hamsters. Brain sections from the superior colliculus were either stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (A and D) or subjected to immunoreactions performed with antibodies directed to the prion protein (PrP) (B and E) or to the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (C and F). Scale bar, 100 μm.
The PMCA process is highly efficient at generation of HY PrPSc and HY TME agents. While animal bioassays are highly sensitive, they are not very accurate, and it has been established that differences in titers between two samples should be greater than 0.8 log units to be considered statistically significant (26). Therefore, it is possible that the titer of the PMCA-generated HY TME agent does not differ from that of the brain-derived HY TME agent. Based on the high titer of the PMCA-generated HY TME agent and the lack of detectable PrPSc and infectivity in the mock-seeded negative controls, we conclude that the HY TME agent contained in PMCA reaction mixtures was indeed generated in vitro. These observations suggest that the presence of the HY TME agent in the PMCA reaction mixtures was not due to contamination, since the majority, or entirety, of the PMCA reaction would have to be a contaminant. Additionally, it is unlikely that the presence of the PMCA-generated HY TME agent was due to spontaneous generation of PrPSc, since we failed to detect PrPSc in the mock-seeded PMCA reaction mixtures and because the reaction mixtures did not result in detectable infectivity. It remains to be determined whether PMCA can generate high titers of agent with other prion strains.
The incubation period of disease does not correspond to the titer of the PMCA-generated HY TME agent. The relationship between the titer of the inoculum and the incubation period is highly reproducible (5, 7, 18, 32, 40). By calculation of the titers of the brain-derived and PMCA-generated HY TME agents (Table 1), the relationship between inoculum titer and incubation period was established (Table 2). Compared to that seen with the brain-derived HY TME agent, the incubation period of the PMCA-generated HY TME agent was, in general, significantly longer per titer unit (Table 2). At low titers, the higher variance of the incubation period may obscure actual differences in incubation periods. The mechanism responsible for this observation is not known; however, several possibilities exist. Exposure of the prion agent to high temperatures can alter the relationship between incubation period and titer (14, 25, 39). Sonication can result in a localized increase in temperature; therefore, it is possible that sonication-generated heat is responsible for the effect (16). Treatment of the prion agent with detergents (e.g., N-lauroyl sarcosinate) can extend the incubation period of disease without reducing titers (20, 36). The PMCA conversion buffer contains Triton X-100, a detergent that can alter the relationship between titer and incubation period (37). The PMCA process can generate new strains; therefore, the observed differences between titers and incubation periods may represent strain interference between HY TME and another strain(s) resulting from the PMCA process (2, 4, 15). The mechanism responsible does not result in a permanent modification of the PMCA-generated HY TME agent, since a second i.c. hamster passage performed using a 1% (wt/vol) brain homogenate from hamsters inoculated with a 10−2 dilution of the PMCA-generated HY TME agent resulted in all (n = 5) of the animals developing clinical disease by 60 ± 3 days postinfection, which is similar to the result seen with the brain-derived HY TME agent (Table 1). Finally, the results presented here suggest that the titer of PMCA-generated prion agent derived from previous studies may be higher than the incubation period would indicate.
Table 2.
Relationship between titer and incubation period of brain-derived and PMCA-generated HY TME agent
| PMCA-generated HY TME inoculum titer (i.c. LD50/g) | Brain-derived HY TME inoculum titer | Increase in no. of days (%) of incubation with brain-derived vs PMCA-generated HY TME agent | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 106.5 | 106.3 | 12 (17) | <0.05 |
| 105.5 | 105.3 | 14 (15) | <0.05 |
| 104.5 | 104.3 | 10 (10) | <0.05 |
| 103.5 | 103.3 | 75 (40) | >0.05 |
| 102.5 | 102.3 | 52 (28) | <0.05 |
| 101.5 | 101.3 | 22 (10) | >0.05 |
Acknowledgments
We thank Maria Christensen for excellent technical assistance and Anthony Kincaid for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by the National Center for Research Resources (P20 RR0115635-6, C06 RR17417-01, and G20RR024001) and the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke (2R01 NS052609).
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 28 September 2011.
REFERENCES
- 1. Ayers J. I., et al. 2011. The strain-encoded relationship between PrP replication, stability and processing in neurons is predictive of the incubation period of disease. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1001317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Barria M. A., Mukherjee A., Gonzalez-Romero D., Morales R., Soto C. 2009. De novo generation of infectious prions in vitro produces a new disease phenotype. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Barria M. A., Telling G. C., Gambetti P., Mastrianni J. A., Soto C. 2011. Generation of a new form of human PrP(Sc) in vitro by interspecies transmission from cervid prions. J. Biol. Chem. 286:7490–7495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bartz J. C., Aiken J. M., Bessen R. A. 2004. Delay in onset of prion disease for the HY strain of transmissible mink encephalopathy as a result of prior peripheral inoculation with the replication-deficient DY strain. J. Gen. Virol. 85:265–273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bartz J. C., Kincaid A. E., Bessen R. A. 2003. Rapid prion neuroinvasion following tongue infection. J. Virol. 77:583–591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bartz J. C., et al. 2007. Prion interference is due to a reduction in strain-specific PrPSc levels. J. Virol. 81:689–697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bessen R. A., Marsh R. F. 1992. Identification of two biologically distinct strains of transmissible mink encephalopathy in hamsters. J. Gen. Virol. 73:329–334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Borchelt D. R., Scott M., Taraboulos A., Stahl N., Prusiner S. B. 1990. Scrapie and cellular prion proteins differ in their kinetics of synthesis and topology in cultured cells. J. Cell Biol. 110:743–752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Castilla J., et al. 2008. Crossing the species barrier by PrP(Sc) replication in vitro generates unique infectious prions. Cell 134:757–768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Castilla J., Saa P., Hetz C., Soto C. 2005. In vitro generation of infectious scrapie prions. Cell 121:195–206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Caughey B., Raymond G. J. 1991. The scrapie-associated form of PrP is made from a cell surface precursor that is both protease- and phospholipase-sensitive. J. Biol. Chem. 266:18217–18223 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Colby D. W., et al. 2009. Design and construction of diverse mammalian prion strains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:20417–20422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Deleault N. R., Harris B. T., Rees J. R., Supattapone S. 2007. Formation of native prions from minimal components in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:9741–9746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Dickinson A. G., Fraser H. 1969. Modification of the pathogenesis of scrapie in mice by treatment of the agent. Nature 222:892–893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Dickinson A. G., Fraser H., Meikle V. M., Outram G. W. 1972. Competition between different scrapie agents in mice. Nat. New Biol. 237:244–245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Flint E. B., Suslick K. S. 1991. The temperature of cavitation. Science 253:1397–1399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jeffrey M., McGovern G., Siso S., Gonzalez L. 2011. Cellular and sub-cellular pathology of animal prion diseases: relationship between morphological changes, accumulation of abnormal prion protein and clinical disease. Acta Neuropathol. 121:113–134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kincaid A. E., Bartz J. C. 2007. The nasal cavity is a route for prion infection in hamsters. J. Virol. 81:4482–4491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kong Q., et al. 2005. Chronic wasting disease of elk: transmissibility to humans examined by transgenic mouse models. J. Neurosci. 25:7944–7949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lax A. J., Millson G. C., Manning E. J. 1983. Can. scrapie titres be calculated accurately from incubation periods? J. Gen. Virol. 64:971–973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Legname G., et al. 2004. Synthetic mammalian prions. Science 305:673–676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Makarava N., et al. 2010. Recombinant prion protein induces a new transmissible prion disease in wild-type animals. Acta Neuropathol. 119:177–187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Marsh R. F., Hanson R. P. 1978. The Syrian hamster as a model for the study of slow virus diseases caused by unconventional agents. Fed. Proc. 37:2076–2078 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Marsh R. F., Kincaid A. E., Bessen R. A., Bartz J. C. 2005. Interspecies transmission of chronic wasting disease prions to squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). J. Virol. 79:13794–13796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mould D. L., Dawson A. M. 1970. The response in mice to heat treated scrapie agent. J. Comp. Pathol. 80:595–600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Mould D. L., Dawson A. M., Smith W. 1967. Determination of the dosage-response curve of mice inoculated with scrapie. J. Comp. Pathol. 77:387–391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Prusiner S. B. 1982. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 216:136–144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Prusiner S. B., Cochran S. P., Downey D. E., Groth D. F. 1981. Determination of scrapie agent titer from incubation period measurements in hamsters. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 134:385–399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Race B., et al. 2009. Susceptibilities of nonhuman primates to chronic wasting disease. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15:1366–1376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Reed L. J., Muench H. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Epidemiol. 27:493–497 [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sandberg M. K., et al. 2010. Chronic wasting disease prions are not transmissible to transgenic mice overexpressing human prion protein. J. Gen. Virol. 91:2651–2657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Saunders S. E., Shikiya R. A., Langenfeld K., Bartelt-Hunt S. L., Bartz J. C. 2011. Replication efficiency of soil-bound prions varies with soil type. J. Virol. 85:5476–5482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Shikiya R. A., Ayers J. I., Schutt C. R., Kincaid A. E., Bartz J. C. 2010. Co-infecting prion strains compete for a limiting cellular resource. J. Virol. 84:5706–5714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Sigurdson C. J., Aguzzi A. 2007. Chronic wasting disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1772:610–618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Sigurdson C. J., et al. 2009. De novo generation of a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy by mouse transgenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:304–309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Somerville R. A., Carp R. I. 1983. Altered scrapie infectivity estimates by titration and incubation period in the presence of detergents. J. Gen. Virol. 64:2045–2050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Somerville R. A., Millson G. C., Kimberlin R. H. 1980. Sensitivity of scrapie infectivity to detergents and 2-mercaptoethanol. Intervirology 13:126–129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Tamgüney G., et al. 2006. Transmission of elk and deer prions to transgenic mice. J. Virol. 80:9104–9114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Taylor D. M., Fernie K. 1996. Exposure to autoclaving or sodium hydroxide extends the dose-response curve of the 263K strain of scrapie agent in hamsters. J. Gen. Virol. 77:811–813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Taylor D. M., McConnell I., Ferguson C. E. 2000. Closely similar values obtained when the ME7 strain of scrapie agent was titrated in parallel by two individuals in separate laboratories using two sublines of C57BL mice. J. Virol. Methods 86:35–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


