Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1986 Apr;83(8):2604–2608. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2604

Primary antibody responses to a well-defined and unique hapten are not enhanced by preimmunization with carrier: analysis in a viral model.

S C Gupta, H Hengartner, R M Zinkernagel
PMCID: PMC323347  PMID: 3010314

Abstract

We used a viral model to reexamine classical experiments showing that mice previously primed with a "carrier" molecule alone and then challenged with the carrier-hapten conjugate exhibited an enhanced antihapten antibody response. Mice were primed with live or UV-inactivated vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) Indiana (Ind) serotype with or without complete Freund's adjuvant. After challenge with VSV New Jersey (NJ), these mice developed a secondary-type IgG response, measured by antibody binding in an ELISA, against both VSV-Ind and VSV-NJ. The same result was found for the reciprocal experiments where mice were primed with VSV-NJ. Similarly, when mice were primed with live VSV, UV-inactivated VSV, or purified VSV glycoprotein G of Ind or NJ serotype and later were challenged with dinitrophenyl (N2ph)-conjugated, UV-inactivated VSV or with N2ph-conjugated G protein of either serotype, they exhibited a secondary-type anti-N2ph antibody response as demonstrated by the binding of IgG to dinitrophenylated bovine serum albumin measured by ELISA. In contrast, when neutralizing antibody responses were monitored, VSV-Ind-primed mice challenged with VSV-NJ developed a strictly primary type of anti-VSV-NJ response and vice versa. We conclude that preexistent helper T cells specific for shared carrier determinants do not improve virgin B-cell responses specific for "new," unique determinants that are the target for the biologically relevant neutralizing antibodies. These findings suggest that priming of B cells rather than of helper T cells may be of importance to induce protective immunity mediated by antibodies.

Full text

PDF
2604

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASHLEY H., OVARY Z. EFFECT OF BOVINE GAMMA GLOBULIN ON SUBSEQUENT IMMUNIAZTION WITH DINITROPHENYLATED BOVINE GAMMA GLOBULIN. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1965 Jun;119:311–314. doi: 10.3181/00379727-119-30165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anders E. M., Katz J. M., Jackson D. C., White D. O. In vitro antibody response to influenza virus. II. Specificity of helper T cell recognizing hemagglutinin. J Immunol. 1981 Aug;127(2):669–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COE J. E., SALVIN S. B. THE IMMUNE RESPONSE IN THE PRESENCE OF DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY OF CIRCULATING ANTIBODY. J Immunol. 1964 Sep;93:495–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dietzschold B., Schneider L. G., Cox J. H. Serological characterization of the three major proteins of vesicular stomatitis virus. J Virol. 1974 Jul;14(1):1–7. doi: 10.1128/jvi.14.1.1-7.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Effros R. B., Doherty P. C., Gerhard W., Bennink J. Generation of both cross-reactive and virus-specific T-cell populations after immunization with serologically distinct influenza A viruses. J Exp Med. 1977 Mar 1;145(3):557–568. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.3.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FREUND J. The effect of paraffin oil and mycobacteria on antibody formation and sensitization; a review. Am J Clin Pathol. 1951 Jul;21(7):645–656. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/21.7.645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamaoka T., Takatsu K., Kitagawa M. Antibody production in mice. V. The suppressive effect of anti-carrier antibodies on cellular cooperation in the induction of secondary anti-hapten antibody responses. Immunology. 1973 Mar;24(3):409–424. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Katz D. H., Benacerraf B. The regulatory influence of activated T cells on B cell responses to antigen. Adv Immunol. 1972;15:1–94. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60683-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Katz D. H., Paul W. E., Goidl E. A., Benacerraf B. Carrier function in anti-hapten immune responses. I. Enhancement of primary and secondary anti-hapten antibody responses by carrier preimmunization. J Exp Med. 1970 Aug 1;132(2):261–282. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.2.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelley J. M., Emerson S. U., Wagner R. R. The glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus is the antigen that gives rise to and reacts with neutralizing antibody. J Virol. 1972 Dec;10(6):1231–1235. doi: 10.1128/jvi.10.6.1231-1235.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kontiainen S. The effect of carrier-primed cells on an adoptive anti-hapten response. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Aug;1(4):276–280. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lefrancios L., Lyles D. S. The interactionof antiody with the major surface glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus. I. Analysis of neutralizing epitopes with monoclonal antibodies. Virology. 1982 Aug;121(1):157–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levine B. B. Specificity of the anamnestic response to a double hapten conjugate in guinea pigs primed with a single hapten. J Immunol. 1967 Dec;99(6):1173–1177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miller J. F., Mitchell G. F. Thymus and antigen-reactive cells. Transplant Rev. 1969;1:3–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1969.tb00135.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mitchison N. A. The carrier effect in the secondary response to hapten-protein conjugates. II. Cellular cooperation. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Jan;1(1):18–27. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Palese P., Young J. F. Variation of influenza A, B, and C viruses. Science. 1982 Mar 19;215(4539):1468–1474. doi: 10.1126/science.7038875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rajewsky K., Schirrmacher V., Nase S., Jerne N. K. The requirement of more than one antigenic determinant for immunogenicity. J Exp Med. 1969 Jun 1;129(6):1131–1143. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.6.1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Reiss C. S., Burakoff S. J. Specificity of the helper T cell for the cytolytic T lymphocyte response to influenza viruses. J Exp Med. 1981 Aug 1;154(2):541–546. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.2.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rittenberg M. B., Amkraut A. A. Immunogenicity of trinitrophenyl-hemocyanin: production of primary and secondary anti-hapten precipitins. J Immunol. 1966 Sep;97(3):421–430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schierman L. W., McBride R. A. Adjuvant activity of erythrocyte isoantigens. Science. 1967 May 5;156(3775):658–659. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3775.658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Scott D. W., Gershon R. K. Determination of total and merecaptothanol-resistant antibody in the same serum sample. Clin Exp Immunol. 1970 Feb;6(2):313–316. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tada T., Okumura K. Regulation of homocytotropic antibody formation in the rat. V, Cell cooperation in the anti-hapten homocytotropic antibody response. J Immunol. 1971 Oct;107(4):1137–1145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thomas D. B., Hackett C. J., Askonas B. A. Evidence for two T-helper populations with distinct specificity in the humoral response to influenza A viruses. Immunology. 1982 Nov;47(3):429–436. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Volk W. A., Synder R. M., Benjamin D. C., Wagner R. R. Monoclonal antibodies to the glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus: comparative neutralizing activity. J Virol. 1982 Apr;42(1):220–227. doi: 10.1128/jvi.42.1.220-227.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wagner R. R., Snyder R. M., Yamazaki S. Proteins of vesicular stomatitis virus: kinetics and cellular sites of synthesis. J Virol. 1970 May;5(5):548–558. doi: 10.1128/jvi.5.5.548-558.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wiley D. C., Wilson I. A., Skehel J. J. Structural identification of the antibody-binding sites of Hong Kong influenza haemagglutinin and their involvement in antigenic variation. Nature. 1981 Jan 29;289(5796):373–378. doi: 10.1038/289373a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zinkernagel R. M., Rosenthal K. L. Experiments and speculation on antiviral specificity of T and B cells. Immunol Rev. 1981;58:131–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1981.tb00352.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES