Skip to main content
American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology logoLink to American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology
. 2011 Aug 24;301(6):F1195–F1201. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00339.2011

Increased renin excretion is associated with augmented urinary angiotensin II levels in chronic angiotensin II-infused hypertensive rats

Liu Liu 1, Alexis A Gonzalez 1, Michael McCormack 1, Dale M Seth 1, Hiroyuki Kobori 1, L Gabriel Navar 1, Minolfa C Prieto 1,
PMCID: PMC3233871  PMID: 21865264

Abstract

Renin expression in principal cells of collecting ducts (CD) is upregulated in angiotensin II (ANG II)-dependent hypertensive rats; however, it remains unclear whether increased CD-derived renin undergoes tubular secretion. Accordingly, urinary levels of renin (uRen), angiotensinogen (uAGT), and ANG II (uANG II) were measured in chronic ANG II-infused Sprague-Dawley rats (80 ng/min for 14 days, n = 10) and sham-operated rats (n = 10). Systolic blood pressure increased in the ANG II rats by day 5 and continued to increase throughout the study (day 13; ANG II: 175 ± 10 vs. sham: 116 ± 2 mmHg; P < 0.05). ANG II infusion increased renal cortical and medullary ANG II levels (cortical ANG II: 606 ± 72 vs. 247 ± 43 fmol/g; P < 0.05; medullary ANG II: 2,066 ± 116 vs. 646 ± 36 fmol/g; P < 0.05). Although plasma renin activity (PRA) was suppressed in the ANG II-infused rats (0.3 ± 0.2 vs. 5.5 ± 1.8 ng ANG I·ml−1·h−1; P < 0.05), renin content in renal medulla was increased (12,605 ± 1,343 vs. 7,956 ± 765 ng ANG I·h−1·mg−1; P < 0.05). Excretion of uAGT and uANG II increased in the ANG II rats [uAGT: 1,107 ± 106 vs. 60 ± 26 ng/day; P < 0.0001; uANG II: 3,813 ± 431 vs. 2,080 ± 361 fmol/day; P < 0.05]. By day 13, despite suppression of PRA, urinary prorenin content increased in ANG II rats [15.7 ± 3 vs. 2.6 ± 1 × 10−3 enzyme units excreted (EUE)/day, P < 0.01] as was the excretion rate of renin (8.6 ± 2 × 10−6 EUE/day) compared with sham (2.8 ± 1 × 10−6 EUE/day; P < 0.05). Urinary renin and prorenin protein levels examined by Western blot were augmented ∼10-fold in the ANG II-infused rats. Concomitant AT1 receptor blockade with candesartan prevented the increase. Thus, in ANG II-dependent hypertensive rats with marked PRA suppression, increased urinary levels of renin and prorenin reflect their augmented secretion by CD cells into the luminal fluid. The greater availability of renin and AGT in the urine reflects the capability for intratubular ANG II formation which stimulates sodium reabsorption in distal nephron segments.

Keywords: collecting duct renin, urinary angiotensinogen, distal nephron, prorenin, gene expression


in angiotensin ii (ANG II)-dependent hypertension, the intrarenal ANG II content is greater than can be explained from the levels found in plasma (8, 20, 23, 42). Increases in ANG II levels in the kidney can be explained partially by enhanced ANG II type 1 receptor (AT1R)-mediated uptake (22, 25, 42). In addition, augmentation of proximal tubule angiotensinogen (AGT) synthesis and secretion, which leads to increased urinary AGT excretion, has been associated with increased intratubular ANG II levels (1416). The presence of AGT in the urine indicates that AGT traverses the distal nephron segments where it may then be cleaved to ANG I, to the extent that an adequate source of renin is available (36).

Although renin is synthesized primarily by the juxtaglomerular apparatus (JGA) cells (8), renin is also expressed in the proximal tubules (5, 11, 21, 39), connecting tubules, and cortical and medullary collecting duct (CD) cells from rat, mouse, and human (12, 30, 32, 33, 36). Renin in the CD is upregulated by chronic ANG II infusions, via an AT1R-mediated mechanism (33), and is independent of blood pressure (34). The presence of apical renin immunostaining in CD cells of human and mouse tissues and renin secretion from isolated CD cells in vitro suggest that these cells may secrete renin (36). Kang et al. (12) showed renin mRNA and protein stimulation in M1 cells, a cortical CD cell line from mouse origin, when these cells were treated with ANG II. However, there is limited in vivo evidence that renin is secreted by the CD and whether it is increased in ANG II-dependent hypertension.

For this study, we hypothesized that during conditions of stimulated CD renin, renin synthesized by principal cells of the CD is secreted into the lumen, and is available to act on luminal AGT delivered from the proximal tubules, thus contributing to increased intratubular ANG I formation. Increased urinary renin excretion in chronic ANG II-infused rats, which is a model that exhibits suppression of plasma renin activity (PRA), may reflect augmented renin secretion by CD cells and increased CD luminal renin activity. Our objective was to evaluate this hypothesis in male Sprague-Dawley rats chronically infused with ANG II for 2 wk, by examining the presence and nature of renin protein levels and its activity in the urine. Additional experiments were performed in rats with maximum PRA suppression due to addition of a high-salt diet, plus similarly treated rats subjected to AT1 receptor blockade with candesartan.

METHODS

Experimental animals, sample collections, and tissue preparation.

The experimental protocols were approved by the Tulane Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (170 to 220 g, n = 30; Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were cage- housed and maintained in a temperature-controlled room with a 12:12-h light-dark cycle, with free access to tap water and standard rat chow (Ralston Purina, St. Louis, MO) for 14 days. Rats were randomly selected and subjected to either sham operation (n = 10) or ANG II infusion (Human ANG II, Sigma, St. Louis, MO; n = 10) via a subcutaneous osmotic minipump (Alzet model 2002, Alza, Palo Alto, CA) at a rate of 80 ng/min for 14 days. Additional studies were performed in ANG II-infused rats maintained on a very high-salt diet (n = 5) to maximize the suppression of PRA and rats treated with candesartan to block AT1 receptors (n = 5). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was monitored by tail-cuff plethysmography (IITC, Woodland Hills, CA) on 1 day before and 5, 8, and 12 days after ANG II infusion. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected on days1, 2, 6, and 13 following sham operation or minipump implantation. At day 14, rats were subjected to conscious decapitation and blood and kidneys were harvested. Trunk blood was collected for measuring PRA and plasma ANG II levels. After decapsulation, kidneys were weighed, cross-sectioned, and renal cortices were dissected from inner medullas under stereomicroscopy for regional determination of kidney renin content (KRC).

PRA and plasma ANG II levels.

The blood samples for PRA were collected into 5.0 mmol/l EDTA and were assayed as previously described (40). PRA was expressed as nanograms per milliliter per hour of generated ANG I. For plasma ANG II levels, blood samples were collected into tubes containing a mixed inhibitor solution (5 mmol/l of EDTA, 20 μmol/l of pepstatin, 20 μmol/l of enalapril, 1.25 mmol/l of 1,10-phenanthroline, and 10 μmol/l of PMSF) to avoid in vitro formation and degradation of angiotensin peptides and were assayed as described previously (38).

Urinary AGT and urinary ANG II excretion.

Urinary concentrations of AGT were measured using an ELISA kit (Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Minneapolis, MS) as previously described (13). Urinary ANG II concentrations were determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA) as previously described (38) by incubating the samples with rabbit anti-ANG II antiserum (Peninsula Laboratories, Torrance, CA) and 125I-radiolabled ANG II (Perkin-Elmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Waltham, MA). Results are expressed in femtomoles per 24 h of urine.

Renin, prorenin, and total renin content in the urine.

Urinary renin content (URC) was determined by using modified protocols from the PRA assay [GammaCoat Plasma Renin Activity 125I RIA kit (DiaSorin, Stillwater, MN)]. Briefly, for the URC assay, each urine sample was spiked with 1 μM synthetic renin substrate tetradecapeptide (RST; Sigma) for 15 min in 37°C water bath. The generated ANG I was assayed by RIA. To exclude the effect of peptidases, identical urine samples-RST with the specific renin inhitor WFML peptide (AnaSpec, Fremont, CA) were used as controls. The values were expressed as enzyme units excreted per day (EUE; in which each EU is defined as micromoles of substrate converted into product per h). Total renin content included active renin and inactive prorenin. Prorenin was activated by adding 5 mg/ml of trypsin (Sigma) for 18 h at 37°C and the reaction was stopped with soybean trypsin inhibitor (20 mg/ml; Sigma). Trypsinized urine samples were also subjected to the above protocol to determine total renin content. Prorenin content was calculated as the difference between the total renin and the active renin.

KRC and ANG II contents.

For KRC assessment, the medulla of each kidney was immersed in cold KRC homogenization buffer (2.6 mM EDTA, 3.4 mM hydroxyquinoline, 5 mM ammonium acetate, 200 μM PMSF, and 0.256 μM dimercaprol), minced, and quickly homogenized. The homogenates were centrifuged at 4,000 rpm at 4°C for 30 min and the supernatants were used to generate 1:1,000 dilutions that were spiked with 1 μM synthetic RST (Sigma). The generated ANG I in the samples was then assayed using the Diasorin RIA kit (DiaSorin). ANG II was extracted from renal cortices and medullas and assayed as previously described (38).

Western blot analysis of renin protein levels in the urine.

Each urine sample was concentrated 30-fold using a 10,000 NMWL centrifugal filter (Millipore, Carrigtwohill, Cork, Ireland) to measure renin protein levels by Western blot. The same fraction (7.0 × 10−3) of a 24-h urine volume (equivalent to the calculated urine volume of 10 min) for each animal was electrophoretically separated on a precast NuPAGE 10% Bis-Tris gel (Novex) at 200 V for 55 min. The proteins were electrophoretically transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Invitrogen) using iBlot (Invitrogen, Carsbad, CA). Blots were blocked with Odyssey blocking buffer (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE) at room temperature for 2 h, incubated with the primary antibody (rabbit anti-renin polyclonal IgG, sc-22752, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) at 1:100 dilution overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with the secondary antibody donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-22752) at 1:40,000 dilution at room temperature for 45 min. Detection was accomplished using an Odyssey fluorescent scanner. Urinary creatinine excretion (uCr) was used as the loading control.

Statistical analysis.

Results are expressed as means ± SE. The data were analyzed using unpaired Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA when appropriate. Statistical significance is defined at a value of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Body weight and SBP.

Body weights were similar at the initiation of the study (sham: 185 ± 5, ANG II: 189 ± 2 g), but on day 13, body weights were significantly lower in ANG II-infused rats compared with sham (286 ± 9 vs. 336 ± 8 g; P < 0.05). At the beginning of the study, SBP values were similar between both groups of rats (sham: 132 ± 4, ANG II: 127 ± 2 mmHg), but by day 5, SBP was significantly elevated in ANG II-infused rats compared with sham rats (163 ± 11 vs. 115 ± 2 mmHg; P < 0.05) and continued to increase in ANG II-infused rats throughout the study (day 12; 175 ± 10 vs. 116 ± 2 mmHg; P < 0.05).

Plasma ANG II levels, kidney ANG II levels, and urinary ANG II excretion.

Plasma ANG II levels in sham-operated rats averaged 22 ± 10 fmol/ml and were markedly lower than those in ANG II-infused rats (180 ± 56 fmol/ml; P < 0.05; Fig. 1A). ANG II infusion significantly increased renal cortical and medullary ANG II contents compared with sham-operated rats (cortical ANG II: 606 ± 72 vs. sham: 247 ± 43 fmol/g; P < 0.05; medullary ANG II: 2,066 ± 116 vs. 646 ± 36 fmol/g; P < 0.05; Fig. 1B). Urinary ANG II excretion was similar in sham-operated rats compared with values obtained in all the rats before minipump implantation. After 12 days of ANG II infusion, urinary ANG II was significantly higher compared with sham-operated rats (3,813 ± 431 vs. 2,080 ± 361 fmol/day; Fig. 2A).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

ANG II levels in chronic ANG II-infused rats and sham-operated rats. Plasma ANG II levels (A), kidney cortex ANG II levels (B), and medullary ANG II levels (C) from ANG II-infused (n = 10), and sham-operated rats (n = 10). Values are means ± SE. *P < 0.05 compared with sham.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Urinary ANG II and urinary AGT excretion rates in ANG II-infused rats and sham-operated rats. uANG II (A) and uAGT (B) excretion rates were augmented in ANG II-infused rats (n = 10) compared with controls (n = 10). uANG II and uAGT excretion rates were measured from urine collected at day1 and day 12 of ANG II infusion. *P < 0.001 vs. sham.

Urinary angiotensinogen excretion.

At the beginning of the protocol, 24-h urine volumes were similar between both groups (sham: 10 ± 1, ANG II: 13 ± 3 ml/day). However, due to pressure diuresis and the dipsogenic effect of ANG II, the chronic ANG II-infused rats had increased urine volume compared with sham rats (52 ± 8 vs. 13 ± 1 ml/day; P < 0.05). At 13 days, urinary excretion rates of creatinine were similar between sham and ANG II rats (10,201 ± 388 vs. 9,246 ± 1,109 μg/day). The urinary angiotensinogen (uAGT) excretion rates (Fig. 2B) remained at control levels in sham rats (day −1: 58 ± 15 vs. day 12: 60 ± 26 ng/day), but they were markedly increased by ∼20-fold in ANG II-infused rats (1,107 ± 106 vs. 60 ± 26 ng/day; P < 0.0001).

PRA and KRC.

Chronic ANG II infusion alone or in combination with high-salt diet suppressed PRA (0.3 ± 0.2 and 0.2 ± 0.1 ng ANG I·ml−1·h−1) compared with sham-operated rats (5.5 ± 2 ng ANG I·ml−1·h−1; P < 0.05). Concomitant treatment with candesartan to chronic ANG II-infused rats fed a high-salt diet significantly increased PRA levels (41.3 ± 12.3 ng ANG I·ml−1·h−1; P < 0.0001). In contrast to PRA, renin content in renal medullary tissues, determined by measuring the amount of ANG I generated per hour from added substrate corrected by wet tissue weights, was increased in chronic ANG II-infused rats compared with sham-operated rats (12,605 ± 1,343 vs. 7,956 ± 765 ng ANG I·ml−1·h−1; P < 0.05; Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Renal medulla renin content and urine renin content. Kidney medullary renin content was measured in inner renal medullary samples from chronic ANG II-infused rats and sham-operated rats (A). Urinary renin content (uRen; B) was measured in 24-h urine samples collected on day1 of ANG II infusions (n = 20) and in collections from day 13 of sham-operated rats (n = 10), ANG II-infused rats (n = 10), ANG II-infused rats fed a high-salt (HS; 8% NaCl; n = 5) diet, and ANG II + HS + candesartan (26 mg/l in drinking water for 14 days; n = 5). Values are means ± SE. *P < 0.05 ANG II rats vs. sham rats.

Urinary renin/prorenin excretion in chronic ANG II-infused rats: effects of concomitant administration of a high-salt diet and AT1R blockade.

As depicted in the Fig. 3B by day 13 of the study, the urinary renin/prorenin (uRen) excretion was increased in ANG II-infused rats compared with sham-operated rats (8.6 ± 2 vs. 2.8 ± 1 × 10−6 EUE/day; P < 0.05). To maximize the suppression of PRA and avoid a substantial contribution of renin from the circulation into the urine, we further examined the uRen excretion in urine samples from chronic ANG II-infused rats fed a high-salt diet (8% NaCl). The urine of these rats showed values of renin content significantly higher than sham rats (9.6 ± 4 × 10−6 EUE/day; P < 0.05 vs. sham). The increases in uRen were prevented in rats receiving concomitant administration of 25 mg/l of candesartan in drinking water (4.7 ± 2.5 × 10−6 EUE/day) even though PRA levels were increased thus showing a dissociation between uRen and PRA. Importantly, the measurement of active renin content in the urine (Fig. 4A) and after trypsinization demonstrated that urinary prorenin excretion (Fig. 4B) was further augmented in ANG II-infused rats compared with sham-operated rats (prorenin: 15.7 ± 3 vs. 2.6 ± 1 × 10−3 EUE /day; P < 0.001), indicating that most of the renin in the urine is in the prorenin form.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Active renin (A) and prorenin measured in the presence of trypsin (B) in the urine of chronic ANG II-infused rats and sham-operated rats. Notice that the amount of prorenin expressed in enzymatic units excreted (EUE) per day of urinary renin (uRen) after trypsinization (B) is 1,000 times higher than renin (A). Values are means ± SE. *P < 0.01 ANG II rats vs. sham rats.

Renin protein levels in the urine.

The identity of the specific bands of renin (38 kDa) and prorenin (48 kDa) found in the urine samples of sham-operated and ANG II-infused rat was assessed by Western blot in the presence of positive controls using recombinant pure renin and prorenin proteins (Fig. 5A). The specificity of the antibody used to detect renin and prorenin in urine samples, as well as the identity of prorenin and renin bands were addressed by preadsorption of the renin antibody using 2× excess of purified recombinant human prorenin peptides (Lee Biosolutions, St. Louis, MI; Fig. 5B). After normalization for uCr, the amounts of renin (uRen-W/uCr) and prorenin (uProren-W/uCr) proteins measured by Western blot were significantly augmented in ANG II rats compared with sham rats (Table 1).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Renin and prorenin protein in the urine in chronic ANG II-infused rats and sham-operated rats. Renin and prorenin protein were visualized by Western blot in 3 independent experiments using urine samples concentrated ×30. The identity of renin (38 kDa) and prorenin (48 kDa) bands was based on comparison with positive controls using human recombinant renin and prorenin proteins (2.5 μl/lane; A). The specificity of the antibody and the identities of renin bands were confirmed by preadsorption using a polyclonal rabbit antirenin antibody (sc-22752, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) preadsorbed with excess (×3) human recombinant prorenin for 72 h (B). hPR, human recombinant prorenin; hRen, human recombinant renin; MW, molecular weight; Ang, angiotensin.

Table 1.

Urinary parameters after 14 days of ANG II infusions

Parameters Units Sham ANG II
Urine volume ml/day 13 ± 1 52 ± 8*
uCr μg/day 10,201 ± 388 9,246 ± 1,109
uRen-R/uCr μmol ANG I/mg 5 ± 1 × 10−7 13 ± 3 × 10−7*
uRen-W/uCr du·mg−1·day−1 4.4 ± 0.2 52.6 ± 14.0*
uProren-W/uCr du·mg−1·day−1 8.6 ± 2.2 45.7 ± 6.5*

Data are means ± SE of urine volume, urinary creatinine excretion rate (uCr), urine renin and prorenin protein levels in chronic ANG II-infused rats and sham-operated rats. The amounts of urinary renin determined by RIA (uRen-R/uCr) and renin and prorenin proteins determined by Western blot (uRen-W/uCr and uProren-W/uCr) were normalized with the urinary creatinine and expressed as ratios. uRen, urinary renin excretion rate; uProren, urinary prorenin excretion rate; -R, renin activity by RIA; -W, band intensity measured by Western blot; du, integrated densitometric unit.

*

P < 0.05 vs. sham.

DISCUSSION

Several animal models of ANG II-dependent hypertension, including two-kidney, one-clip hypertensive rats, Cyp1a1-Ren2 gene transgenic rats, and chronic ANG II-infused rats, exhibit increased intrarenal ANG II levels to an extent greater than can be explained from equilibration with the circulating concentrations (22, 24, 25, 42). The demonstration that AGT and ANG II are present in high concentrations in the proximal tubule fluid and in the urine of ANG II-dependent hypertensive rats (15, 24) indicates continued formation of intratubular ANG I and ANG II despite marked suppression of PRA. Thus, for intratubular ANG I generation, a different source of renin other than from JGA cells is needed. Importantly, the models of ANG II-dependent hypertension described exhibit a marked enhancement of renin gene expression and protein in CD cells (30, 32, 34). Renin upregulation in principal cells of CD segments in ANG II-dependent hypertensive rats provides the means for enhanced intratubular ANG II formation in hypertension by the combination of CD renin acting on proximal tubule-derived AGT delivered to form ANG I (26, 31) and with subsequent conversion to ANG II by ACE present in the CDs (3, 4, 17). The critical finding of the present study is the demonstration of augmented prorenin and renin protein levels and increased renin activity in the urine of chronic ANG II-infused rats compared with control rats. Increased renin activity in the urine of chronic ANG II-infused rats reflects augmented renin activity in CD tubular fluid that may provide a final mechanism to increase intratubular ANG I formation. It is unlikely that increased prorenin and renin in the urine of ANG II-hypertensive rats are derived from filtered renin, since JGA renin and PRA are markedly suppressed in the chronic ANG II-infused model of hypertension. Furthermore, although basal secretion of renin by the principal cells into the peritubular capillaries and from these into the systemic circulation is possible, the contribution of filtered renin to the augmented prorenin and renin in the urine of ANG II-hypertensive rats seems unlikely since the chronic ANG II-infused rat model has marked suppression of JG renin and PRA levels. Campbell et al. (2) reported in Dahl salt-sensitive rats that renal anti-renin immunoreactivity and renin mRNA in JG cells changed in proportion to plasma prorenin not plasma renin between low- and high-salt diets. In the Dahl sensitive rats that also exhibit PRA suppression, plasma prorenin levels were significantly lower than Dahl resistant rats at 7 wk of age (2). Moreover, differences in urinary renin are not due to variations in the collection of the urine samples since the uCr rates were similar between ANG II and sham rats at day 13. Rohrwasser et al. (36) and Kang et al. (12), respectively, showed that renin can be secreted by CD cells using immunoblots of isolated CD from mouse kidneys (36) and cultures of immortalized mouse cortical CD cells (M-1 cells) treated with ANG II (12). The present study supports the hypothesis that the augmented renin enzymatic activity and content in the urine of chronic ANG II-infused rats reflect augmented renin secretion into the CD tubular fluid of ANG II-hypertensive rats.

We also examined the content of renin and prorenin in the urine of the rats of this study and found that there was abundant renin and even greater prorenin content in the urine of ANG II-infused rats. In diabetic rats which is a model of high circulating prorenin, CD cells are the main source of prorenin (12). Nguyen and associates (27) cloned the prorenin receptor [(P)RR] that binds renin and prorenin. Receptor-bound prorenin exhibits full enzymatic activity comparable to that of active renin (27). Recent findings by Cousin et al. (7) demonstrate that the full-length form of (P)RR is processed intracellularly by cleavage leading to a soluble form [s(P)RR] that can be secreted and bind prorenin and renin. We recently demonstrated that the urinary levels of the soluble form of (P)RR were augmented in ANG II-infused rats (10). These findings, along with the increases in prorenin excretion rate and augmented renin activity in the urine of ANG II rats, further support a functional role for the s(P)RR in the tubular fluid facilitating the generation of ANG I from AGT delivered to distal nephron segments from the proximal tubules during ANG II-dependent hypertension.

The molecular weight of renin by gel filtration or SDS-PAGE has been reported to be between 38 and 42 kDa (6, 9, 19). However, it has also been reported that renin in kidney tissues from rats and mice has variable degrees of glycosylation, which may account for the reported variations in molecular weight (6, 9, 19). In the present study, we characterized the prominent bands detected by immunoblotting with an estimated molecular weight of 33 and 40 kDa, respectively, as renin and prorenin because they have the expected molecular size of the bands reported for the used antibody; but more importantly, because the specificity and identity of the detected bands by Western blot were confirmed by preadsorption and by the use of human recombinant prorenin and renin, as positive controls in the blots.

Enhanced intrarenal ANG II content in ANG II-infused rats is partially due to stimulation of intrarenal ANG II uptake via an AT1R-mediated mechanism (22, 25, 42). Indeed, it has been shown that AT1R-mediated uptake of circulating [125I] Val5-ANG II in the kidney, particularly by the proximal tubule cells, contributes to the increase in ANG II content within the kidney and in the urine after it is secreted in chronic [125I] Val5-ANG II-infused wild-type mice (18). Although it is likely that part of the ANG II content in the kidney tissue and urine is a consequence of uptake of ANG II from the circulation, Shao et al. (38) demonstrated that over 50% of intrarenal and urine levels of ANG II are derived from de novo local formation. Importantly, the fact that the urinary excretion of AGT in ANG II-infused rats increased ∼20-fold compared with that of sham rats, while urinary ANG II and renin activity both increased ∼2-fold in ANG II-infused rats, indicates that urinary prorenin/renin availability rather than the substrate AGT is rate limiting for local ANG I generation. Although the increased AGT in the urine of ANG II rats is most likely due to augmented endogenous synthesis and secretion by the proximal tubules cells, the coexistence of proteinuria (ANG II: 45.8 ± 8.0 vs. 14.7 ± 1.0 mg/day; P < 0.05) raises the possibility that an increase in filtered AGT contributes to the augmented uAGT (29). Regardless of the source, however, the increased AGT in the urine reflects increased substrate availability in the lumen of distal nephron segments, which by combined local action of intraluminal renin and ACE may lead to increased ANG I and ANG II generation. Demonstration of ACE in the CD fluid and urine (3, 4), as well as its secretion by isolated CD cells (3, 4, 17) indicate that CD ACE contributes to the increased ANG II formation, thus leading to enhanced distal nephron sodium reabsorption and the maintenance of high blood pressure (17, 28). Indeed, we found that the uANG II excretion rate was markedly increased in ANG II-infused rats. The present study does not allow us to delineate the percentage of ANG II in the urine of ANG II rats derived from local production; however, Shao et al. (38) documented that the kidney levels of endogenous Ile5-ANG II increased ∼70% in Val5-ANG II-infused rats compared with that in sham kidneys. In rats infused with Val5-ANG II, the urinary Ile5-ANG II excretion rates at 2 wk infusion increased 93% compared with preinfusion levels, indicating augmented formation of endogenous ANG II. The results from Shao et al. (38) demonstrate that the increases in intrarenal and urinary ANG II levels during chronic ANG II infusions involve substantial stimulation of endogenous ANG II formation, which supports the conclusion that a major fraction of the ANG II content of the ANG II rats is newly formed in the kidney (38).

In summary, the results indicate that the increased renin content in medullary tissues and augmented renin enzymatic activity in the urine of ANG II-infused hypertensive rats contribute to the maintenance of intratubular ANG II levels observed in this model of experimental hypertension. The availability in distal nephron segments of ACE (3, 17, 28, 35) along with increased urinary levels of AGT (15), active renin, prorenin as well as sPRR collectively contribute to elevated and sustained intratubular ANG I and ANG II generation in chronic ANG II-hypertensive rats. The resultant ANG II-mediated effects on the apical transporters of CD cells could be acting synergistically and in concert with aldosterone to stimulate distal nephron sodium reabsorption and contribute to overall enhanced sodium reabsorption (1, 28, 41).

GRANTS

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (IdeA P20-RR-017659–06, NHL BI HL-26731), American Heart Association (09BGIA2280440 and 09PRE2209079), and Tulane-BIRCWH (K12HD043451).

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Shannon Netherby and Jessica Mucci for excellent technical assistance.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Beutler KT, Masilamani S, Turban S, Nielsen J, Brooks HL, Ageloff S, Fenton RA, Packer RK, Knepper MA. Long-term regulation of ENaC expression in kidney by angiotensin II. Hypertension 41: 1143–1150, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Campbell WG, Jr, Gahnem F, Catanzaro DF, James GD, Camargo MJF, Laragh JH, Sealey JE. Plasma and renal prorenin/renin, renin mRNA, and blood pressure in Dahl salt-sensitive and salt-resistant rats. Hypertension 27: 1121–1133, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Casarini DE, Boim MA, Stella RCR, Krieger-Azzolini MH, Krieger JE, Schor N. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme activity in tubular fluid along the rat nephron. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 272: F405–F409, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Casarini DE, Boim MA, Stella RCR, Schor N. Endopeptidases (kininases) are able to hydrolyze kinins in tubular fluid along the rat nephron. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 276: F66–F74, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chen M, Harris MP, Rose D, Smart A, He XR, Kretzler M, Briggs JP, Schnermann J. Renin and renin mRNA in proximal tubules of the rat kidney. J Clin Invest 94: 237–243, 1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Corvol P, Devaux C, Ito T, Sicard P, Ducloux J, Menard J. Large scale purification of hog renin. Physicochemical characterization. Circ Res 41: 616–622, 1977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cousin C, Bracquart D, Contrepas A, Corvol P, Muller L, Nguyen G. Soluble form of the (pro)renin receptor generated by intracellular cleavage by furin is secreted in plasma. Hypertension 53: 1077–1082, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. De Nicola L, Keiser JA, Blantz RC, Gabbai FB. Angiotensin II and renal functional reserve in rats with Goldblatt hypertension. Hypertension 19: 790–792, 1992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dzau VJ, Slater EE, Haber E. Complete purification of dog renal renin. Biochemistry 18: 5224–5228, 1979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Gonzalez AA, Lara LS, Luffman C, Seth DM, Prieto MC. The soluble form of the prorenin receptor [s(PRR)] is augmented in the collecting ducts and in the urine of angiotensin II (ANG II)-dependent hypertensive rats. Hypertension 57: 859–864, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hackenthal E, Paul M, Ganten D, Taugner R. Morphology, physiology, and molecular biology of renin secretion. Physiol Rev 70: 1067–1116, 1990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kang JJ, Toma I, Sipos A, Meer EJ, Vargas SL, Peti-Peterdi J. The collecting duct is the major source of prorenin in diabetes. Hypertension 51: 1597–1604, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Katsurada A, Hagiwara Y, Miyashita K, Satou R, Miyata K, Ohashi N, Navar LG, Kobori H. Novel sandwich ELISA for human angiotensinogen. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 293: F956–F960, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kobori H, Harrison-Bernard LM, Navar LG. Enhancement of angiotensinogen expression in angiotensin II-dependent hypertension. Hypertension 37: 1329–1335, 2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kobori H, Harrison-Bernard LM, Navar LG. Urinary excretion of angiotensinogen reflects intrarenal angiotensinogen production. Kidney Int 61: 579–585, 2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kobori H, Nishiyama A, Harrison-Bernard LM, Navar LG. Urinary angiotensinogen as an indicator of intrarenal Angiotensin status in hypertension. Hypertension 41: 42–49, 2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Komlosi P, Fuson AL, Fintha A, Peti-Peterdi J, Rosivall L, Warnock DG, Bell PD. Angiotensin I conversion to angiotensin II stimulates cortical collecting duct sodium transport. Hypertension 42: 195–199, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Li XC, Zhuo JL. In vivo regulation of AT1a receptor-mediated intracellular uptake of [125I]Val5-ANG II in the kidneys and adrenals of AT1a receptor-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 294: F293–F302, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Matoba T, Murakami K, Inagami T. Rat renin: purification and characterization. Biochim Biophys Acta 526: 560–571, 1978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Mitchell KD, Jacinto SM, Mullins JJ. Proximal tubular fluid, kidney, and plasma levels of angiotensin II in hypertensive ren-2 transgenic rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 273: F246–F253, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Moe OW, Ujiie K, Star RA, Miller RT, Widell J, Alpern RJ, Henrich WL. Renin expression in renal proximal tubule. J Clin Invest 91: 774–779, 1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Navar LG, Harrison-Bernard LM. Intrarenal angiotensin II augmentation in angiotensin II dependent hypertension. Hypertens Res 23: 291–301, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Navar LG, Harrison-Bernard LM, Nishiyama A, Kobori H. Regulation of intrarenal angiotensin II in hypertension. Hypertension 39: 316–322, 2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Navar LG, Lewis L, Hymel A, Braam B, Mitchell KD. Tubular fluid concentrations and kidney contents of angiotensins I and II in anesthetized rats. J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 1153–1158, 1994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Navar LG, Mitchell KD, Harrison-Bernard LM, Kobori H, Nishiyama A. Intrarenal angiotensin II levels in normal and hypertensive states. JRAAS 2: S176–S184, 2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Navar LG, Prieto-Carrasquero MC, Kobori H. Renin renin-angiotensin system. In: Handbook of Biologically Active Peptides, edited by Kastin AJ. London: Academic, 2006, p. 1235–1242 [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nguyen G, Delarue F, Burckle C, Bouzhir L, Giller T, Sraer JD. Pivotal role of the renin/prorenin receptor in angiotensin II production and cellular responses to renin. J Clin Invest 109: 1417–1427, 2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Peti-Peterdi J, Warnock DG, Bell PD. Angiotensin II directly stimulates ENaC activity in the cortical collecting duct via AT(1) receptors. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 1131–1135, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pohl M, Kaminski H, Castrop H, Bader M, Himmerkus N, Bleich M, Bachmann S, Theilig F. Intrarenal renin angiotensin system revisited. J Biol Chem 285: 41935–41946, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Prieto MC, Williams DE, Liu L, Kavanagh KL, Mullins JJ, Mitchell KD. Enhancement of renin and prorenin receptor in the collecting ducts of Cyp1a1-Ren2 rats contribute to development and progression of malignant hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol In press [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Prieto-Carrasquero MC, Botros FT, Kobori H, Navar LG. Collecting duct renin: a major player in angiotensin II-dependent hypertension. J Am Soc Hypertens 3: 96–104, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Prieto-Carrasquero MC, Harrison-Bernard LM, Kobori H, Ozawa Y, Hering-Smith KS, Hamm LL, Navar LG. Enhancement of collecting duct renin in angiotensin II-dependent hypertensive rats. Hypertension 44: 223–229, 2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Prieto-Carrasquero MC, Kobori H, Ozawa Y, Gutierrez A, Seth D, Navar LG. AT1 receptor-mediated enhancement of collecting duct renin in angiotensin II-dependent hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 289: F632–F637, 2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Prieto-Carrasquero MC, Botros FT, Pagan J, Kobori H, Seth DM, Casarini DE, Navar LG. Collecting duct renin is upregulated in both kidneys of 2-kidney, 1-clip Goldblatt hypertensive rats. Hypertension 51: 1590–1596, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Redublo Quinto BM, Camargo de Andrade MC, Ronchi FA, Santos EL, ves Correa SA, Shimuta SI, Pesquero JB, Mortara RA, Casarini DE. Expression of angiotensin I-converting enzymes and bradykinin B2 receptors in mouse inner medullary-collecting duct cells. Int Immunopharmacol 8: 254–260, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Rohrwasser A, Morgan T, Dillon HF, Zhao L, Callaway CW, Hillas E, Zhang S, Cheng T, Inagami T, Ward K, Terreros DA, Lalouel JM. Elements of a paracrine tubular renin-angiotensin system along the entire nephron. Hypertension 34: 1265–1274, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Schunkert H, Ingelfinger JR, Jacob H, Jackson B, Bouyounes B, Dzau VJ. Reciprocal feedback regulation of kidney angiotensinogen and renin mRNA expressions by angiotensin II. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 263: E863–E869, 1992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Shao W, Seth DM, Navar LG. Augmentation of endogenous intrarenal angiotensin II levels in Val5-ANG II-infused rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 296: F1067–F1071, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Taugner R, Hackenthal E, Inagami T, Nobiling R, Poulsen K. Vascular and tubular renin in the kidneys of mice. Histochemistry 75: 473–484, 1982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Von Thun AM, Vari RC, El-Dahr SS, Navar LG. Augmentation of intrarenal angiotensin II levels by chronic angiotensin II infusion. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 266: F120–F128, 1994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zhao D, Seth DM, Navar LG. Enhanced distal nephron sodium reabsorption in chronic angiotensin II-infused mice. Hypertension 54: 120–126, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Zou L, Imig JD, Von Thun AM, Hymel A, Ono H, Navar LG. Receptor-mediated intrarenal ANG II augmentation in ANG II-infused rats. Hypertension 28: 669–677, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES