Background: Acetylxylan esterases are enzymes that remove acetyl groups from the hemicellulolytic polymer xylan.
Results: The axe2 gene product in Geobacillus stearothermophilus removes acetyl groups from acetylated xylan and xylosaccharides.
Conclusion: Axe2 represents a new serine carbohydrate esterase family.
Significance: The findings may provide new routes for the efficient utilization of biomass as a renewable energy source.
Keywords: Biofuel, Cellulase, Enzyme Catalysis, Glycoside Hydrolases, NMR, Plant Cell Wall, Serine Protease, Acetylxylan Esterase, Hemicellulose, Regioselectivity
Abstract
Acetylxylan esterases hydrolyze the ester linkages of acetyl groups at positions 2 and/or 3 of the xylose moieties in xylan and play an important role in enhancing the accessibility of xylanases to the xylan backbone. The hemicellulolytic system of the thermophilic bacterium Geobacillus stearothermophilus T-6 comprises a putative acetylxylan esterase gene, axe2. The gene product belongs to the GDSL hydrolase family and does not share sequence homology with any of the carbohydrate esterases in the CAZy Database. The axe2 gene is induced by xylose, and the purified gene product completely deacetylates xylobiose peracetate (fully acetylated) and hydrolyzes the synthetic substrates 2-naphthyl acetate, 4-nitrophenyl acetate, 4-methylumbelliferyl acetate, and phenyl acetate. The pH profiles for kcat and kcat/Km suggest the existence of two ionizable groups affecting the binding of the substrate to the enzyme. Using NMR spectroscopy, the regioselectivity of Axe2 was directly determined with the aid of one-dimensional selective total correlation spectroscopy. Methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside was rapidly deacetylated at position 2 or at positions 3 and 4 to give either diacetyl or monoacetyl intermediates, respectively; methyl 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-glucopyranoside was initially deacetylated at position 6. In both cases, the complete hydrolysis of the intermediates occurred at a much slower rate, suggesting that the preferred substrate is the peracetate sugar form. Site-directed mutagenesis of Ser-15, His-194, and Asp-191 resulted in complete inactivation of the enzyme, consistent with their role as the catalytic triad. Overall, our results show that Axe2 is a serine acetylxylan esterase representing a new carbohydrate esterase family.
Introduction
Acetylxylan esterases take part in the degradation of xylan by microorganisms, which utilize plant biomass for growth (1). Many xylans are decorated with acetyl side groups attached at position 2 or 3 of the xylose backbone units. For example, in 4-O-methyl-d-glucuronoxylan, the main hardwood hemicellulose, 7 of 10 xylose units are acetylated (2). In general, the removal of these side chains improves the access for xylanases and facilitates the hydrolysis between the sugar backbone units (3). Acetylxylan esterases are classified in the CAZy Database and are found in 8 of 16 carbohydrate esterase (CE)2 families (4). Families CE3 (acetylxylan esterases) and CE12 (pectin acetylesterases, rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterases, and acetylxylan esterases) are also classified as lipase GDSL family proteins (Pfam accession number PF00657).
Geobacillus stearothermophilus T-6 is a Gram-positive thermophilic bacterium that possesses an extensive hemicellulolytic system, with >40 genes involved in the utilization of hemicellulose (5, 6). The bacterium degrades xylan by initially secreting an extracellular xylanase (7–10), which partially degrades xylan to decorated xylo-oligomers that are transported into the cell via a specific ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transport system (11). Inside the cell, the decorated xylo-oligomers are hydrolyzed by side chain-cleaving enzymes, arabinofuranosidases (12–14) and glucuronidase (15–17), and finally by intracellular xylanase (18) and xylosidases (19, 20).
The axe2 gene (GenBankTM accession number ABI49953.1) was identified in G. stearothermophilus as part of a three-gene operon, which also includes xynB3 (encoding β-xylosidase) (21, 22) and an uncharacterized gene, xynX (GenBankTM accession number DQ868502.2). According to sequence similarities, the axe2 gene product, Axe2, is a serine hydrolase belonging to the lipase GDSL family (UniProtKB/TrEMBL accession number Q09LX1) and is made up of 219 amino acids with a calculated molecular mass of 24,770 Da. The lipase GDSL family is one of four families that make up the SGNH hydrolase superfamily (Pfam clan accession number CL0264) (23, 24). The SGNH superfamily consists of enzymes with a diverse range of hydrolytic functions that include lipase, protease, esterase, thioesterase, arylesterase, lysophospholipase, acyltransferase, and carbohydrate esterase activities (23). Members of the SGNH superfamily are characterized by four conserved sequence blocks identified as blocks I, II, III, and V of the five conserved blocks first used by Upton and Buckley to define a new family of lipolytic enzymes (25). The GDSX motif, which contains the nucleophilic Ser residue, is part of block I and is equivalent to the classical GXSXG motif of lipases/esterases, whereas the consensus amino acids Gly, Asn, and His belong to blocks II, III and V, respectively. The His residue acts as the base and activates the catalytic Ser residue, whereas the role of Asp, also from block V, is not clear and is thought to affect the catalytic His residue by increasing its basic character, stabilizing it during the formation of the tetrahedral intermediate, or ensuring its correct orientation (26, 27). The main chains of the conserved catalytic Ser and Gly residues in block II and the side chain of Asn in block III serve as the proton donors for the oxyanion hole, a positively charged pocket that activates the carbonyl and stabilizes the negatively charged oxyanion of the tetrahedral intermediates (26–31). In this work, we report the identification and characterization of Axe2, a new acetylxylan esterase belonging to the SGNH superfamily.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Enzyme Source
The axe2 gene was amplified via PCR from G. stearothermophilus T-6 genomic DNA using primers 5′-GGAGGAAAAGAGGACCATGGAAATCGGCTCTGGCG-3′ (with NcoI restriction site, N-terminal) and 5′-GGATGTATGTATGATGCTCAGCTTATCTAGACCTAACCCAC-3′ (with BlpI restriction site, C-terminal), cloned into the pET9d expression vector (Novagen), expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells (Novagen), and purified by gel filtration as described previously (15). Xylanase XT6 was prepared as described previously (32).
Real-time RT-PCR Analysis
Growth conditions for G. stearothermophilus were as described by Shulami et al. (6). Total RNA was isolated with an RNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Reverse transcription of RNA was performed with a Verso cDNA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer's protocol with 1 μg of total RNA and random hexamers as primers. Control reactions were carried out in the absence of reverse transcriptase. Gene relative quantification was performed with the Applied Biosystems 7300 real-time PCR system according to the manufacturer's instructions. The reaction mixture (20 μl) included template cDNA, 300 nm each primer, and Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). The amplification conditions for all reactions were one cycle at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 15 s. Data analysis was carried out with the 7300 system software (Applied Biosystems) using the housekeeping gene citC for normalization.
Substrates
p-Nitrophenyl acetate, 2-naphthyl acetate, phenyl acetate, 4-methylumbelliferyl acetate, and N-acetylglucosamine were purchased from Sigma. Acetylxylan was prepared as described previously (33) using dimethyl sulfoxide, potassium borate, and acetic anhydride. Methyl-β-d-xylopyranoside and methyl-β-d-glucopyranoside (Sigma) were acetylated using pyridine and acetic anhydride to give the peracetate sugars (34). Xylobiose peracetate was prepared following enzymatic digestion of birch wood xylan by xylanase XT6, followed by acetylation (34) and purification using silica gel chromatography (230–400 mesh) with 1:1 (v/v) hexane/ethyl acetate. Acetylation of the sugars was confirmed, where possible, by proton NMR spectroscopy.
Biochemical Characterization and Kinetic Studies
The activity of Axe2 on synthetic substrates was determined by measuring the release of the leaving groups using an Ultrospec 2100 pro UV/visible spectrophotometer (GE Healthcare) equipped with a temperature-stabilized water-circulating bath. The extinction coefficients (ϵ) and wavelengths (λ) that were used at pH 6 are as follows: 4-nitrophenyl, ϵ = 1.17 mm−1 cm−1 and λ = 420 nm; 2-naphthyl, ϵ = 1.15 mm−1 cm−1 and λ = 330 nm; phenyl, ϵ = 0.91 mm−1 cm−1 and λ = 277 nm; and 4-methylumbelliferyl, ϵ = 0.94 mm−1 cm−1 and λ = 356 nm. The extinction coefficients for 2-naphthyl at different pH values were also determined. The reactions contained 450 μl of either citrate phosphate buffer (for pH 5–8) or Clark and Lubs buffer (for pH 8–10) with the enzyme at the appropriate concentration (1.5 × 10−4 to 3.75 × 10−5 mm final concentrations in the reactions) and 350 μl of substrate dissolved in either isopropyl alcohol or Me2SO. Blank samples contained either isopropyl alcohol or Me2SO and the appropriate buffer. Control mixtures containing all of the reactants except the enzyme were used to correct for spontaneous hydrolysis of the substrates. The standard reaction was carried out with 43 mm p-nitrophenyl acetate in citrate phosphate buffer (pH 6) at 30 °C. Michaelis-Menten constants were obtained from initial rates at different substrate concentrations and following analysis using GRAFIT 5.0.1 (Erithacus Software, Surrey, United Kingdom). Thermal stability was determined by incubating the enzyme at different temperatures for 5 min and measuring the residual activity under the standard assay conditions. Protein melting temperature was determined using differential scanning calorimetry over a temperature range of 40–90 °C as described previously (15). The effect of temperature on the reaction rate was determined by performing the standard reaction at different temperatures ranging from 20 to 70 °C. The pH dependence at a range of 5–10 was measured using 2-naphthyl acetate as a substrate at different concentrations (1–100 mm stock concentrations) depending on the pH. The activity of Axe2 on acetylated xylan was determined by following the release of acetic acid (see below). The activities of Axe2 on N-acetylglucosamine and on acetylated xylobiose, methyl-β-d-xylopyranoside, and methyl-β-d-glucopyranoside were determined by TLC and proton NMR spectroscopy (see below). For enzyme kinetics using proton NMR spectroscopy, 1% substrate was dissolved in D2O and centrifuged to ensure a homogeneous solution. The reaction mixture contained 350 μl of substrate solution, 450 μl of deuterated citrate phosphate buffer (pH 6.9), and 35 μl of 2.4 mg/ml Axe2.
Analytical Methods
The release of acetic acid was determined with a K-ACETRM acetic acid kit (Megazyme) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Axe2 activity on acetylated sugars was followed by TLC using precoated plates (Silica Gel 60 F254, 0.25 mm; Merck) with 1:2:7 (v/v) water/methanol/ethyl acetate as the running solvent. Sugars were visualized by charring with solution containing 120 g of (NH4)Mo7O24 and 5 g of (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6 in 800 ml of 10% H2SO4. Xylanase XT6 activity was determined using the BCA assay for reducing sugars (35) with xylose as a standard.
Structural Analysis of Substrates and Products
Proton NMR spectroscopy was performed in D2O or deuterated buffers on Bruker Avance AV-III 400 and AV-III 600 spectrometers operating at 400.40- and 600.55-MHz resonance frequencies, respectively. Five-mm outer diameter glass tubes were used with broadband (BBO) probe heads with automatic tuning equipped with z-gradients and 2H lock. Typical data on the Bruker Avance AV-III 600 spectrometer were collected with eight shots, a 69.3-μs dwell time, 65,536 real points (in the time domain), and a relaxation time of 4 s to allow quantification of the spectra. Total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY) was performed with the Bruker AV-III 600 spectrometer irradiating at anomeric protons (homonuclear Hartman-Hahn transfer using the MLEV-17 sequence for mixing) (36). Typical data were collected with 32 shots, a 83.2-μs dwell time, 65,536 real points, a relaxation time of 4 s, and mixing times of 20–80 ms.
Site-directed Mutagenesis
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) with the following primers (with mutated nucleotides in boldface): 5′-CTC-TTT-ATT-GGT-GAT-GCT-ATC-ACT-GAT-TGC-GGC-CG-3′ and 5′-CG-GCC-GCA-ATC-AGT-GAT-AGC-ATC-ACC-AAT-AAA-GAG-3′for the S15A mutant, 5′-GCT-GCG-CTC-GCT-TGG-GCC-CGG-GTT-CAC-CCG-TCC-GT-3′ and 5′-AC-GGA-CGG-GTG-AAC-CCG-GGC-CCA-AGC-GAG-CGC-AGC-3′ for the D191A mutant, and 5′-GCT-TGG-GAT-CGG-GTT-GCT-CCG-TCC-GTT-GCG-GGA-C-3′ and 5′-G-TCC-CGC-AAC-GGA-CGG-AGC-AAC-CCG-ATC-CCA-AGC-3′ for the H194A mutant. DNA production and purification were performed with E. coli XL1-Blue (Stratagene) and an SV Minipreps DNA purification kit (Promega). All mutations were verified by DNA sequencing. The DNA was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells, and the mutant enzymes were purified as described previously (15).
RESULTS
Axe2 Represents a New Carbohydrate Esterase Family
The axe2 gene in G. stearothermophilus T-6 is located within a large gene cluster for xylan utilization. The gene is part of a three-gene operon, which includes the xynB3 gene (encoding an intracellular GH43 β-xylosidase) (21, 22) and a putative regulatory gene with unknown function, xynX. The axe2 gene product does not contain any recognizable Gram-positive leader sequence and is therefore most likely an intracellular enzyme. Real-time RT-PCR analysis indicated that the expression level of axe2 was ∼8-fold higher in cultures grown on xylose than on arabinose as the carbon source. These results suggest that the gene is induced by xylose, in agreement with its physical arrangement on the chromosome. Amino acid sequence analysis of Axe2 using the ConSurf server (37) provided nine homologs, which were further subjected to multiple sequence alignment using MUSCLE 3.7. The homologs showed >50% identity and included the four conserved blocks of the SGNH hydrolase superfamily (25). None of the homologs are assigned to a known family in the CAZy Database, and no published experimental data are available for these enzymes. Further analysis using the Pfam Database (24), which is based on domain identification, indicated that Axe2, together with families CE12 and CE3, can be assigned to the lipase GDSL family (Pfam accession number PF00657). Using sequences from families CE3 and CE12 (obtained from the CAZy Database) (4), a phylogenetic tree yielded three distinct clusters: the CE3 sequences, the CE12 sequences, and Axe2 with its homolog sequences (Fig. 1). Close inspection of the conserved blocks of the three groups revealed some differences in the amino acid composition specific to each group. In addition, family CE3 does not possess block II, in contrast to the other two groups (38). Taken together, the data suggest that Axe2 and its homologs constitute a new family of carbohydrate esterases.
FIGURE 1.
Unrooted neighbor-joining tree with 500 bootstrap replications. The tree was generated using the Phylogeny.fr server (46) and includes amino acid sequences of Axe2, its homologs, and members of the CE3 and CE12 families (obtained from the CAZy Database) (4). Family (where appropriate), accession number, and organism name are indicated.
Biochemical Characterization of Axe2
The axe2 gene was overexpressed efficiently in E. coli using the T7 polymerase expression system. The purification procedure included heat treatment and gel filtration, providing >700 mg of purified enzyme/liter of culture. Based on SDS-PAGE, the protein was >90% pure. Thermal stability was determined after incubating the enzyme at different temperatures for 5 min. The residual activity was measured under the standard assay conditions. The enzyme was stable at 60 °C and lost most of its activity at 70 °C. This result is in good agreement with the melting temperature of the protein (72 °C), measured by differential scanning calorimetry. The effect of temperature on the reaction rate was determined using p-nitrophenyl acetate as the substrate at temperatures ranging from 20 to 70 °C. The highest activity in a 5-min reaction was between 50 and 60 °C, and the activation energy calculated from an Arrhenius plot was 40 kJ/mol. The pH dependence of the kinetic constants at a range of 5–10 was determined using 2-naphthyl acetate at substrate concentrations of 0.1–100 mm. The catalytic constant (kcat) versus pH gave a flat bell-shaped curve, with a pH optimum range of 7.1–9.2 (Fig. 2A). The pH dependence of the specificity constant (kcat/Km) gave a symmetrical sharper curve with a pH optimum of 8.5 (Fig. 2B). The differences between the curves are mainly due to changes in the Km values with pH. For example, the Km value at pH 7.1 was 2.3 mm compared with 0.62 mm at pH 8.5. Axe2 was capable of hydrolyzing synthetic substrates bearing leaving groups with different pKa values (Table 1). There were no significant changes in activity (kcat) toward the different substrates, suggesting that the rate-limiting step is the second deacetylation step.
FIGURE 2.
pH dependence of kinetic parameters for hydrolysis of 2-naphthyl acetate by Axe2. A, kcat versus pH; B, kcat/Km versus pH. Reactions were performed either in citrate phosphate buffer for pH 5–8 (●) or in Clark and Lubs buffer for pH 8–10 (○).
TABLE 1.
Kinetic parameters for Axe2 activity on different synthetic substrates at pH 6.0 and 30 °C
Michaelis-Menten constants were obtained from initial rates at different substrate concentrations and following analysis using GRAFIT 5.0.1. The reactions contained 450 μl of citrate phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) with the enzyme in the appropriate concentration (1.5 × 10−4 to 3.75 × 10−5 mm final concentrations in the reactions) and 350 μl of substrates dissolved in either isopropyl alcohol or Me2SO. Control mixtures containing all of the reactants except the enzyme were used to correct for spontaneous hydrolysis of the substrates.
Substrate | pKa | kcat | Km | kcat/Km | Specific activity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
s−1 | mm | mm−1s−1 | mmol min−1mg−1 | ||
Phenyl acetate | 9.99 | 77 | 7 | 11 | 187 |
2-Naphthyl acetate | 9.51 | 190 | 9 | 20 | 460 |
4-Methylumbelliferyl acetate | 7.53 | 123 | 3 | 41 | 297 |
4-Nitrophenyl acetate | 7.18 | 31 | 27 | 1 | 72 |
Axe2 Is an Acetylxylan Esterase
To test whether Axe2 can act on natural sugars, the specificity of the enzyme on acetylated carbohydrates was determined. Axe2 hydrolyzed ∼20–30% of the available acetyl groups on fully acetylated birch wood xylan. Interestingly, the resulting partially deacetylated xylan could not be degraded further by the GH10 family extracellular xylanase XT6. On the other hand, Axe2 completely deacetylated xylobiose peracetate (fully acetylated) at pH 7 (Fig. 3). Following the reaction by proton NMR spectroscopy showed that the enzyme was active on both the α- and β-forms of the sugar (immediate disappearance of both anomeric protons of the substrate). TLC and proton NMR analysis showed that the enzyme completely deacetylated methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside and methyl 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-glucopyranoside but failed to deacetylate N-acetylglucosamine. Taken together, the results suggest that the enzyme is an intracellular O-linked deacetylase, active on short xylo-oligomers.
FIGURE 3.
Deacetylation of xylobiose peracetate by Axe2 as viewed on a TLC plate at pH 7. Reactions were carried out in duplicates and contained 1.8 ml of citrate phosphate buffer with Axe2 and 1.4 ml of 1% substrate. Controls to check for spontaneous hydrolysis did not contain the enzyme. C, control; S, enzyme reaction; X2-OAc, xylobiose peracetate; X2, xylobiose.
To reveal further the enzyme mode of action and regioselectivity, partially acetylated intermediates were followed with time using proton NMR. Preliminary data indicated that acetylation of the sugars resulted in deshielding of the proton in the acetylated position, and as a result, there was a significant difference in the chemical shift (0.4–1.5 ppm). One-dimensional selective TOCSY was used to identify partially acetylated sugars by stopping the reaction at different time points and irradiating the anomeric protons of the forming sugar intermediates. During the deacetylation of methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside, two partially acetylated products were observed, which were later identified as methyl 2-mono-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (Fig. 4A) and methyl 3,4-di-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (Fig. 4B). The most shielded anomeric proton that was observed at 4.26 ppm was confirmed to be the deacetylated form of the sugar: methyl-β-d-xylopyranoside. The chemical shifts of the acetylated and non-acetylated methyl-β-d-xylopyranosides are summarized in Table 2. According to the results, the enzyme initially deacetylates either position 2 or positions 3 and 4, with a preference for the later (Fig. 5). Deacetylation of methyl 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-glucopyranoside also resulted in specific partially acetylated intermediates, which eventually became completely deacetylated (Fig. 6). At the start of the reaction, there was a slight movement of the peaks corresponding to positions 2, 3, and 4 and the formation of a peak at 3.8 ppm corresponding to position 6, which suggested that the sugar was not deacetylated at positions 2, 3, and 4 but only at position 6. Deacetylation progressed through two observable intermediates (designated as 1 and 2 in Fig. 6), which could not be resolved using one-dimensional selective TOCSY. Eventually, those intermediates were deacetylated completely to give methyl-β-d-glucopyranoside (designated as 3 in Fig. 6). The chemical shifts of methyl 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-glucopyranoside and the deacetylated form of the sugar in D2O, calibrated with sodium 3-(trimethylsilyl)propanesulfonate (DSS), commonly called sodium 2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate (39), are given in Table 3. Following the reaction on-line using proton NMR spectroscopy ensured proper identification of intermediates and the elimination of acetyl group migration detected in other studies (34, 40).
FIGURE 4.
Identification of partially acetylated methyl-β-d-xylopyranoside by one-dimensional selective TOCSY. A, methyl 2-mono-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside; B, methyl 3,4-di-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside. These acetylated sugars were formed during the deacetylation of methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside by Axe2 at 44 °C in deuterated citrate phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 (spectrum obtained during the reaction is shown at the top). The irradiated anomeric protons are marked by asterisks. Mixing times and assignments of the peaks are indicated.
TABLE 2.
1H NMR data of acetylated and non-acetylated methyl-β-d-xylopyranoside
Data are as viewed after partial deacetylation of methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside by Axe2 in citrate phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) at room temperature. The chemical shifts of the fully acetylated and deacetylated forms of the sugar are also given in D2O, calibrated with DSS. The chemical shifts were determined by one-dimensional selective TOCSY using a Bruker Avance AV-III 600 spectrometer (one-dimensional homonuclear Hartman-Hahn transfer using the MLEV-17 sequence for mixing). Data were collected with 32 shots, a 83.2-μs dwell time, 65,536 real points, a 4-s relaxation time, and 20–80-ms mixing times.
H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5a | H5b | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside | 4.64 | 4.83 | 5.16 | 4.95 | 4.12 | 3.56 |
Methyl 3,4-di-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside | 4.42 | 3.51 | 5.03 | 4.89 | 4.04 | 3.47 |
Methyl 2-mono-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside | 4.46 | 4.61 | 3.58 | 3.65 | 3.95 | 3.30 |
Deacetylmethyl-β-d-xylopyranoside | 4.26 | 3.18 | 3.37 | 3.55 | 3.90 | 3.26 |
Methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranosidea | 4.7 | 4.88 | 5.22 | 5.01 | 4.16 | 3.60 |
Methyl-β-d-xylopyranosidea | 4.31 | 3.23 | 3.42 | 3.60 | 3.96 | 3.31 |
a In D2O calibrated with DSS (δDSS = 0 ppm).
FIGURE 5.
Mode of action of Axe2 on methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside as viewed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. A, deacetylation of methyl 2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (●) by Axe2 and formation of methyl 3,4-di-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (♦), methyl 2-mono-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (▴), and deacetylated β-d-xylopyranoside (○). B, Axe2 mode of action on acetylated methyl-β-d-xylopyranoside.
FIGURE 6.
Deacetylation of methyl 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-glucopyranoside by Axe2 as viewed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The reaction was performed in an NMR tube at 30 °C in deuterated citrate phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). The protons of the sugar ring of the substrate are indicated at the beginning of the reaction. The protons of methyl-β-d-glucopyranoside are indicated at the end of the reaction. The forming anomeric protons are numbered by order of appearance.
TABLE 3.
1H NMR data of acetylated and non-acetylated methyl-β-d-glucopyranoside
The chemical shifts were determined in D2O calibrated with DSS (δDSS = 0 ppm) using one-dimensional selective TOCSY with a Bruker Avance AV-III 600 spectrometer (one-dimensional homonuclear Hartman-Hahn transfer using the MLEV-17 sequence for mixing). Data were collected with 32 shots, a 83.2-μs dwell time, 65,536 real points, a 4-s relaxation time, and 20–80-ms mixing times.
H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6a | H6b | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Methyl 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-glucopyranoside | 4.75 | 4.95 | 5.35 | 5.12 | 4.05 | 4.40 | 4.23 |
Methyl-β-d-glucopyranoside | 4.37 | 3.25 | 3.48 | 3.36 | 3.44 | 3.92 | 3.71 |
Axe2 Is a Serine Esterase
Using the HHpred server (41), we obtained a structural model of Axe2 with the E. coli thioesterase I/protease I/lysophospholipase L1 (26% identity; Protein Data Bank code 1IVN). Similar to proteins in the CE3 and CE12 families, this enzyme is an SGNH hydrolase. The corresponding catalytic residues of Axe2 are Ser-15, His-194, and Asp-191, and the distances between them correspond well to their catalytic role (Fig. 7). These amino acids were independently replaced with Ala to confirm their catalytic nature. The mutations were confirmed by sequencing, and the DNA was transformed into BL21(DE3) cells. The mutant enzymes produced were purified, and their activities were measured at pH 7.2 with 4.4 mm 2-naphthyl acetate in the reaction. None of the mutants exhibited detectable activity.
FIGURE 7.
Catalytic triad of Axe2. The model is based on E. coli thioesterase I/protease I/lysophospholipase L1 (Protein Data Bank code 1IVN) (29) obtained from the HHpred server (41) with 26% identity.
DISCUSSION
Axe2 Represents a New Carbohydrate Esterase Family
The classification of carbohydrate active enzymes in the CAZy Database is based on sequence similarities and reflects structural features and evolutionary relationships, which have implication in catalysis (4). Based on bioinformatics analysis, Axe2 and its homologs do not belong to any known family in the CAZy Database and thus represent a new family of carbohydrate esterases. The axe2 gene is part of the hemicellulolytic system of G. stearothermophilus; the gene is induced by xylose; and the gene product acts on different O-acetylated substrates, such as acetylated methyl-β-d-xylopyranoside, methyl-β-d-glucopyranoside, and xylobiose. Taken together, the results show that Axe2 is an acetylxylan esterase.
Axe2 Regioselectivity
The complete deacetylation of methyl-β-d-xylopyranoside peracetate was shown to occur through two intermediates: methyl 3,4-di-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside and methyl 2-mono-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside. The ability of Axe2 to work through two different partially acetylated intermediates may be explained by the formation of three productive complexes (including the fully acetylated sugar) of the sugar with the enzyme, as suggested by Hakulinen et al. (42). Using proton NMR spectroscopy to follow enzyme kinetics on the acetylated substrates allows the quantification of the forming intermediates and clearly showed the preference of the enzyme to deacetylate positions 3 and 4 rather than position 2 on methyl-β-d-xylopyranoside peracetate. Axe2 completely deacetylates methyl-β-d-glucopyranoside peracetate, initially by removing the acetate group from position 6. The appearance of partially acetylated sugars during deacetylation of either methyl-β-d-xylopyranoside or methyl-β-d-glucopyranoside peracetate indicates the preference of the enzyme for the fully acetylated forms of the sugars rather than the partially acetylated ones. Enzymes from the CE3 family were shown to deacetylate acetylxylan and xylo-oligosaccharides and, in some cases, to enhance xylanase activity on these substrates (38, 43). Biely et al. (3) showed that the CE1, CE4, and CE5 families exhibit acetylxylan esterase activities with strong preference for position 2 on acetylated xylopyranosides. Enzymes in the CE2 family, which were shown to be 6-O-deacetylases (44) with a preference for glucomannan over xylan, also showed activity for positions 3 and 4 on xylopyranosyl residues. This suggests that they could also function as acetylxylan esterases (3).
Catalytic Mechanism of Axe2
All CE families in the CAZy Database use Ser as the nucleophile during catalysis, except for the CE4 family, which comprises metalloenzymes and is deprived of a catalytic Ser in the active site. To date, Axe2 and its homologs were not assigned a CE family, and thus, their catalytic activity cannot be inferred from the CAZy Database. However, the Axe2 structural model, which is based on an SGNH hydrolase (E. coli thioesterase I/protease I/lysophospholipase L1), suggests an orientation of the catalytic residues similar to that of the CE3 family structure (Protein Data Bank code 2VPT) from Clostridium thermocellum. For this structure, the acetate ion was modeled into the catalytic site and was shown to be able to have favorable interactions with the catalytic residues (43). Mutating the three putative catalytic residues of Axe2, Ser-15, Asp-191, and His-194, abolished the catalytic activity of the enzyme, suggesting that this new group comprises serine esterases and thus operates via a double-displacement mechanism. The catalytic cycle occurs in two steps: acetylation, in which the enzyme is acetylated by the substrate and the leaving group is released, followed by a deacetylation step, in which the enzyme is deacetylated by introducing a nucleophilic water molecule (Fig. 8). There is no available information on the residues involved in the formation of the oxyanion hole in acetylxylan esterases, but based on information on the SGNH hydrolase family, the conserved catalytic Ser-15 residue in block I, Gly-63 in block II, and Asn-92 in block III of Axe2 are the likely candidates (23, 30, 42). In the double-displacement mechanism, kcat = k2k3/(k2 + k3) and is made up of the two first-order rate constants, k2 (acetylation step) and k3 (deacetylation step). Because the mechanism involves two steps, Km is in the form of Km = Kdk3/(k1(k2 + k3)). The pH dependence profile of Axe2 shows that kcat remains constant over the wide pH range of 7.1–9.2, but kcat/Km gives a sharp symmetrical curve at pH ∼8.5. This type of behavior indicates that the two ionizable groups observed in the pH profile of kcat/Km with pKa values of 7.6 and 8.5 affect Km. It is likely that the changes in the Km values reflect changes in the dissociation constant (Kd) rather than changes in the rate constants. Thus, the ionizable groups are actually affecting the binding of the substrate to the enzyme (E·ROAc). This behavior is somewhat different from what was found for other serine proteases. For example, the pH profile of chymotrypsin suggests that one of the ionizable group is affecting kcat, whereas the other one is affecting Km (45).
FIGURE 8.
Proposed double-displacement catalytic mechanism for Axe2. The first stage of catalysis involves the acetylation of the enzyme. His acts as a general base and increases Ser nucleophilicity. Ser attacks the ester bond, and a tetrahedral intermediate is formed, which is stabilized by the hydrogen bonds of the oxyanion hole (formed by backbone amino acids). His then acts as a general acid and donates a proton to the sugar. The sugar is released, and the enzyme is acetylated (acyl enzyme intermediate). In the second stage, the enzyme is deacetylated. His, again, acts as a general base and makes a water molecule a nucleophile. The water molecule attacks the ester bond of the acetyl group, creating a second tetrahedral intermediate. The acetyl group is released from the enzyme. His acts as a general acid, donates a proton to Ser, and restores the state of the catalytic site.
Conclusion
In this study, we have reported the existence of a new family of carbohydrate esterases represented by Axe2 from G. stearothermophilus T-6, a hemicellulose-degrading bacterium. The location of the axe2 gene, its induction by xylose, and the ability of the gene product to remove acetyl groups from acetylated xylo-oligosaccharides indicate that Axe2 is an acetylxylan esterase. Together with the CE3 and CE12 families, Axe2 belongs to the SGNH hydrolase superfamily and uses Ser-15, Asp-191, and His-194 for catalysis. Kinetic studies suggest that the observed ionizable groups are related to substrate binding rather than to the catalytic rate constants.
This work was supported by Israel Science Foundation Grant 500/10 (to Y. S.), United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF; Jerusalem, Israel) Grant 96-178 (to Y. S.), and the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology Otto Meyerhof Center for Biotechnology, established by the Minerva Foundation (Munich, Germany).
- CE
- carbohydrate esterase
- TOCSY
- total correlation spectroscopy
- DSS
- sodium 3-(trimethylsilyl)propanesulfonate.
REFERENCES
- 1. Gilbert H. J. (2010) Plant Physiol. 153, 444–455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sjöström E. (1993) Wood Chemistry, Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd Ed., Academic Press, London [Google Scholar]
- 3. Biely P., Mastihubová M., Tenkanen M., Eyzaguirre J., Li X. L., Vršanská M. (2011) J. Biotechnol. 151, 137–142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cantarel B. L., Coutinho P. M., Rancurel C., Bernard T., Lombard V., Henrissat B. (2009) Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D233–D238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Shulami S., Gat O., Sonenshein A. L., Shoham Y. (1999) J. Bacteriol. 181, 3695–3704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Shulami S., Raz-Pasteur A., Tabachnikov O., Gilead-Gropper S., Shner I., Shoham Y. (2011) J. Bacteriol. 193, 2838–2850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gat O., Lapidot A., Alchanati I., Regueros C., Shoham Y. (1994) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 1889–1896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Khasin A., Alchanati I., Shoham Y. (1993) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 1725–1730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lapidot A., Mechaly A., Shoham Y. (1996) J. Biotechnol. 51, 259–264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bar M., Golan G., Nechama M., Zolotnitsky G., Shoham Y., Shoham G. (2004) Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 545–549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Shulami S., Zaide G., Zolotnitsky G., Langut Y., Feld G., Sonenshein A. L., Shoham Y. (2007) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 874–884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Shallom D., Belakhov V., Solomon D., Shoham G., Baasov T., Shoham Y. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 43667–43673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Shallom D., Belakhov V., Solomon D., Gilead-Gropper S., Baasov T., Shoham G., Shoham Y. (2002) FEBS Lett. 514, 163–167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hövel K., Shallom D., Niefind K., Belakhov V., Shoham G., Baasov T., Shoham Y., Schomburg D. (2003) EMBO J. 22, 4922–4932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zaide G., Shallom D., Shulami S., Zolotnitsky G., Golan G., Baasov T., Shoham G., Shoham Y. (2001) Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 3006–3016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Golan G., Shallom D., Teplitsky A., Zaide G., Shulami S., Baasov T., Stojanoff V., Thompson A., Shoham Y., Shoham G. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 3014–3024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Shallom D., Golan G., Shoham G., Shoham Y. (2004) J. Bacteriol. 186, 6928–6937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Solomon V., Teplitsky A., Shulami S., Zolotnitsky G., Shoham Y., Shoham G. (2007) Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 63, 845–859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ben-David A., Bravman T., Balazs Y. S., Czjzek M., Schomburg D., Shoham G., Shoham Y. (2007) ChemBioChem 8, 2145–2151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Bravman T., Zolotnitsky G., Belakhov V., Shoham G., Henrissat B., Baasov T., Shoham Y. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 10528–10536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Brüx C., Ben-David A., Shallom-Shezifi D., Leon M., Niefind K., Shoham G., Shoham Y., Schomburg D. (2006) J. Mol. Biol. 359, 97–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Shallom D., Leon M., Bravman T., Ben-David A., Zaide G., Belakhov V., Shoham G., Schomburg D., Baasov T., Shoham Y. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 387–397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Akoh C. C., Lee G. C., Liaw Y. C., Huang T. H., Shaw J. F. (2004) Prog. Lipid Res. 43, 534–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Finn R. D., Mistry J., Tate J., Coggill P., Heger A., Pollington J. E., Gavin O. L., Gunasekaran P., Ceric G., Forslund K., Holm L., Sonnhammer E. L., Eddy S. R., Bateman A. (2010) Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D211–D222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Upton C., Buckley J. T. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 178–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hedstrom L. (2002) Chem. Rev. 102, 4501–4524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wharton C. W. (1998) The Serine Proteinases, Academic Press, London [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lee L. C., Lee Y. L., Leu R. J., Shaw J. F. (2006) Biochem. J. 397, 69–76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lo Y. C., Lin S. C., Shaw J. F., Liaw Y. C. (2003) J. Mol. Biol. 330, 539–551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Mølgaard A., Kauppinen S., Larsen S. (2000) Structure 8, 373–383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Bakshy K., Gummadi S. N., Manoj N. (2009) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1794, 324–334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Teplitsky A., Feinberg H., Gilboa R., Lapidot A., Mechaly A., Stojanoff V., Capel M., Shoham Y., Shoham G. (1997) Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 53, 608–611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Johnson K. G., Fontana J. D., MacKenzie C. R. (1988) Hemicellulose, Academic Press, London [Google Scholar]
- 34. Biely P., Côté G. L., Kremnický L., Weisleder D., Greene R. V. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1298, 209–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Doner L. W., Irwin P. L. (1992) Anal. Biochem. 202, 50–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kessler H., Oschkinat H., Griesinger C., Bermel W. (1986) J. Magn. Reson. 70, 106–133 [Google Scholar]
- 37. Glaser F., Pupko T., Paz I., Bell R. E., Bechor-Shental D., Martz E., Ben-Tal N. (2003) Bioinformatics 19, 163–164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Aurilia V., Martin J. C., McCrae S. I., Scott K. P., Rincon M. T., Flint H. J. (2000) Microbiology 146, 1391–1397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Harris R. K., Becker E. D., De Menezes S. M., Granger P., Hoffman R. E., Zilm K. W. (2008) Magn. Reson. Chem. 46, 582–598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Biely P., Côté G. L., Kremnický L., Greene R. V., Dupont C., Kluepfel D. (1996) FEBS Lett. 396, 257–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Söding J., Biegert A., Lupas A. N. (2005) Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W244–W248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Hakulinen N., Tenkanen M., Rouvinen J. (2000) J. Struct. Biol. 132, 180–190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Correia M. A., Prates J. A., Brás J., Fontes C. M., Newman J. A., Lewis R. J., Gilbert H. J., Flint J. E. (2008) J. Mol. Biol. 379, 64–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Topakas E., Kyriakopoulos S., Biely P., Hirsch J., Vafiadi C., Christakopoulos P. (2010) FEBS Lett. 584, 543–548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Bender M. L., Killheffer J. V. (1973) CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 1, 149–199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Dereeper A., Guignon V., Blanc G., Audic S., Buffet S., Chevenet F., Dufayard J. F., Guindon S., Lefort V., Lescot M., Claverie J. M., Gascuel O. (2008) Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W465–W469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]