Abstract
Traumatic brain injury is a heterogeneous and multifaceted neurological disorder that involves diverse pathophysiological pathways and mechanisms. Thorough characterization and monitoring of the brain’s status after neurotrauma is therefore highly complicated. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a versatile tool for in vivo spatiotemporal assessment of various aspects of central nervous system injury, such as edema formation, perfusion disturbances and structural tissue damage. Moreover, recent advances in MRI methods that make use of contrast agents have opened up additional opportunities for measurement of events at the level of the cerebrovasculature, such as blood–brain barrier permeability, leukocyte infiltration, cell adhesion molecule upregulation and vascular remodeling. It is becoming increasingly clear that these cerebrovascular alterations play a significant role in the progression of post-traumatic brain injury as well as in the process of post-traumatic brain repair. Application of advanced multiparametric MRI strategies in experimental, preclinical studies may significantly aid in the elucidation of pathomechanisms, monitoring of treatment effects, and identification of predictive markers after traumatic brain injury.
Keywords: Animal models, Contrast agents, Magnetic resonance imaging, Neuroinflammation, Traumatic brain injury
Introduction
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a versatile modality for in vivo imaging of the central nervous system (CNS). The technique relies on detection of MR signals from the highly abundant water protons in tissues. Its versatility stems from the ability to sensitize MRI acquisitions to distinct parameters, such as proton density, MR relaxation times (T1, T2), susceptibility contrast, diffusion, perfusion and flow. This enables multiparametric imaging studies on different pathophysiological events that are involved in the evolution of CNS injury, e.g., after neurotrauma. Furthermore, the availability of MRI in hospital and laboratory settings facilitates the translation between clinical and preclinical research. Hence, MRI studies in experimental models of CNS injury can contribute to the characterization of pathomechanisms and treatment effects, which may lead to improvements in diagnosis and therapeutic strategies after CNS injury.
MRI of Tissue and Perfusion Status
MRI in animal models of traumatic brain injury and other CNS diseases most often involve T2-, diffusion- and/or perfusion-weighted imaging to measure changes in brain tissue and perfusion status (for a review, see Dijkhuizen and Nicolay [1]). The transverse relaxation time of the MR signal, T2, is dependent on the interstitial water content and increases when intercellular or vasogenic edema develops. This has been demonstrated with T2-weighted MRI in rats in the first days after controlled cortical impact injury [2–5], closed-head injury [6, 7] and lateral fluid percussion injury [8]. While T2-weighted MRI serves as a reliable tool to determine the extent and location of CNS lesions at subacute and chronic stages, earlier tissue changes may be detected with diffusion-weighted MRI. Reduction of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) or diffusivity of tissue water, most likely reflective of cytotoxic cell swelling [9], has been detected within hours after experimental traumatic brain injury, which precedes severe tissue damage, e.g., loss of cellularity, and resultant ADC elevations at later stages [6–8, 10–12]. Furthermore, with diffusion tensor imaging [13], it has been shown that changes in diffusion anisotropy and axial diffusivity in gray and white matter can inform on the extent of pericontusional and diffuse axonal injury after controlled cortical impact in mice [14] and head acceleration in rats [15], respectively. These studies reported permanent loss of diffusion anisotropy and initial decline, followed by rise of diffusivity, which correlated with axonal degeneration and demyelination.
The combination of T2- and/or diffusion-weighted MRI with perfusion-weighted MRI allows concurrent assessment of tissue lesions and perfusion alterations. Two perfusion-weighted MRI strategies that are frequently applied are dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-enhanced MRI and arterial spin labeling (ASL) [16–18]. DSC MRI allows calculation of various hemodynamic parameters from MR signal changes caused by first passage of an intravascular bolus of contrast agent. ASL is based on spatially selective inversion or saturation of incoming arterial spins and subsequent detection of labeled blood water in perfused tissue, which enables quantification of cerebral blood flow. Both methods have been applied in rodent models of traumatic brain injury, and have provided insights into the development of focal as well as global post-traumatic cerebral hypoperfusion [7, 11, 19–22]. Figure 1 demonstrates how multiparametric MRI can inform on the spatiotemporal profile of tissue and perfusion changes after experimental traumatic brain injury. T2, diffusivity and cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps, acquired in studies by Immonen et al. [8] and Hayward et al. [20, 23], reveal first signs of secondary injury which slowly evolves from the primary contusion site at a subacute stage after lateral fluid percussion injury in rats, eventually resulting in an enlarged lesion at chronic stages.
Post-traumatic Cerebrovascular Changes
Abovementioned conventional MRI strategies allow depiction of edema formation and perfusion disturbances, which can be useful for diagnosis and treatment evaluation after traumatic brain injury. Nevertheless, the pathophysiology of neurotrauma is highly heterogeneous and complex, and involves various primary and secondary neuropathological pathways [24, 25]. In particular, increasing evidence points towards a major role for inflammatory events in the development of secondary tissue damage following traumatic brain injury, while inflammation has also been implicated in post-traumatic regenerative processes [26–29]. Associated cerebrovascular changes, such as blood–brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, upregulation of cell adhesion molecules, leukocyte infiltration and vascular remodeling, may strongly contribute to secondary hypoperfusion and edema formation after the primary insult, but might also play a part in post-traumatic tissue repair mechanisms [25, 27, 30, 31]. Elucidation of such pathways may contribute to improvement of assessment of injury severity, prediction of lesion progression and identification of targets for interventions after traumatic brain injury. The following paragraphs will briefly describe how specific contrast-enhanced MRI strategies may aid in gaining insights in abovementioned events in relation to neurotrauma.
MRI of BBB Permeability
Assessment of BBB integrity with MRI is based on detection of leakage of MR contrast agent from vascular into parenchymal space in CNS tissue [32, 33]. Intravenously administered paramagnetic contrast agent that leaks out and accumulates in brain parenchyma when microvascular barriers are disrupted, will result in local changes in MR signal intensity. The most frequently used contrast media are gadolinium-containing compounds, such as Gd-DTPA chelate, that locally shorten the longitudinal relaxation time, T1, of the MR signal. Contrast agents are usually injected as a bolus; however, step-down infusion may improve contrast enhancement through higher contrast agent concentrations in plasma and tissue [34]. Contrast-enhanced BBB permeability imaging usually involves a static approach, in which T1-weighted MRI is executed at a specific time-point (typically 10–30 min) after contrast agent injection, to detect hyperintense signal intensities generated by extravasated contrast agent. This is a fast, simple and sensitive method, but it merely provides qualitative information on the integrity of the BBB. Quantification of BBB leakage is feasible with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging, involving repetitive T1-weighted MR image acquisition, and analysis with a tracer kinetic model to assess contrast agent concentration changes in tissue and vasculature as a function of time [33]. This allows calculation of the blood-to-tissue volume transfer constant, K i or K trans, as well as other parameters, such as the extravascular extracellular space volume. Analytical approaches that are frequently applied include Tofts’ compartmental analysis [35] and multiple time-graphic, or Patlak plot analysis [36]. Quantification of BBB permeability with these analysis methods, however, relies on certain physiological assumptions that may not invariably hold under pathological conditions, for instance because of deviations in vascular delivery and cellular uptake of the tracer.
Serial BBB permeability MRI studies, particularly in cerebral ischemia–reperfusion models, have provided evidence for early and late BBB breakdown after experimental CNS injury [37–39]. However, the exact temporal profile of BBB permeability changes is still unclear, as studies include reports of persistent [39], as well as biphasic BBB opening [38]. Acute, transient BBB leakage, as detected with post-contrast T1-weighted MRI, has been shown after experimental traumatic brain injury, and may be prolonged by a post-traumatic secondary insult [40, 41]. In rabbits with weight-drop induced traumatic brain injury, serial DCE MRI revealed increasing K trans in the focal lesion area from 3 h to 3 days post-trauma [42] (Fig. 2). This was followed by a gradual decline, but K trans remained elevated up to 30 days as compared to animals with sham injury.
MRI of Leukocytes
Cellular MRI is based on the detection of cells that have been labeled with MR contrast agent, such as paramagnetic chelates, superparamagnetic particles or 19F MRI-detectable fluorinated particles (for reviews, see Modo et al. [43] and Stoll and Bendszus [44]). MRI-based visualization of various types of hepatobiliary, hematopoietic, immune and stem cells, has most frequently relied on labeling with superparamagnetic iron oxides [43]. These particles, generally ranging in size from a few nanometers to more than a micrometer, can induce very strong contrast effects by local shortening of the T2 or
MRI of Cell Adhesion Molecules
Advances in design and synthesis of contrast agents have recently initiated MRI studies that take advantage of molecular targeting with tailored contrast agents to measure particular disease markers [46–49]. This kind of molecular imaging with MRI typically employs (super)paramagnetic nano- or microparticles with conjugated ligand, e.g., an antibody. Beside a (super)paramagnetic agent, e.g., gadolinium or iron oxide, particles may contain other labels, such as fluorescent dye, for detection with alternative imaging modalities. In addition, polyethylene-glycol coating is often used to increase circulation time and bioavailability.
Molecular MRI contrast agents can be constructed by direct functionalization of (super)paramagnetic agents or particles (e.g., MPIOs) with targeting peptides or antibodies [50]. An alternative platform for the design and formation of molecular imaging probes makes use of lipid formulations, such as liposomes and micelles, that are build up from amphiphilic lipids [51] (Fig. 4). These lipid-based structures can carry various contrast agents in relatively high amounts, which, in combination with the ease of preparation, flexibility and biocompatibility, make these nanoparticles highly adequate for preclinical cellular and molecular imaging studies as well as for drug delivery in patients [52].
Despite the potential of targeted contrast agents to bind and depict molecular markers, molecular MRI studies in the brain are complicated due to the presence of the BBB, which restricts the blood-to-brain transfer of relatively large intravascular molecular MRI probes. For that reason molecular MRI in CNS injury models have largely focused on detection of markers that are expressed on the luminal side of cerebral blood vessels, such as cell adhesion molecules. Studies in rodent models of neuroinflammatory diseases have demonstrated that paramagnetic or superparamagnetic compounds targeted against endothelial cell adhesion molecules, such as P- and E-selectin and VCAM-1, induce local contrast enhancement on T1- or
MRI of Vascularity
There is increasing evidence that chronic vascular remodeling can occur after CNS injury, which may contribute to reestablishment of perfusion, removal of waste product or tissue repair [31, 58]. Preclinical studies have reported traumatic brain injury-induced angiogenesis, which could be promoted with specific therapeutic interventions, leading to improvement of functional outcome [31]. Hayward et al. [23] have recently detected brain region-specific increases in vascular density at 9 months after lateral fluid percussion injury in rats, which, however, showed no clear correlation with restoration of CBF or recovery of neurological function. Evidently, the pattern of changes in brain tissue vascularity and its relation to pathophysiology or plasticity after neurotrauma require further investigation.
Various MRI methods are available for detection of vascular changes in injured brain (for a review, see Seevinck et al. [59]). A particularly powerful approach is offered by steady-state contrast-enhanced MRI, which involves concurrent gradient echo and spin echo MRI acquisition in combination with injection of a superparamagnetic blood pool agent (e.g., USPIOs). This enables measurement of changes in MR relaxation rates
Conclusion
Recent MRI strategies that focus on detection of specific cerebrovascular alterations associated with neurological disorders have advanced the abilities of integrative in vivo studies on the pathophysiology of CNS injury. In particular, the developments in contrast agent chemistry have provided unique opportunities for in vivo MRI-based detection of cellular and molecular processes at the level of the cerebrovasculature, such as the invasion of leukocytes and upregulation of cell adhesion molecules. The application of these cellular and molecular MRI methods in combination with other structural and functional MRI techniques, allows direct correlation of different pathophysiological events in an experimental setting, which can contribute to elucidation of the interaction between the various pathways through which traumatic brain injury develops. Furthermore, preclinical experiments with multiparametric MRI protocols may lead to the identification of exclusive disease biomarkers and distinctive therapeutic targets that can be translated to the clinic. The potential of advanced MRI techniques, such as susceptibility-weighted MRI and diffusion tensor imaging, to aid in the classification of traumatic brain injury patients has recently been described by Kou et al. [62]. These methods, in combination with functional MRI, may also inform on brain remodelling or neural plasticity at later post-traumatic stages [63], which could lead to identification of key processes that contribute to functional recovery and may be stimulated with therapeutic strategies.
In conclusion, studies with novel contrast-enhanced MRI strategies in animal models will provide more insights into the potential of these methods in terms of their sensitivity and specificity to detect distinctive characteristics of traumatic brain injury. The outcome of such studies, as well as adequate evaluation of safety issues, will be critical to determine whether these contrast-enhanced MRI techniques have potential for clinical application in neurotrauma patients.
Acknowledgements
Research leading to this paper has received funding from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) (VIDI 917.76.347) and the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreements no. 201024 and no. 202213 (European Stroke Network).
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
References
- 1.Dijkhuizen RM, Nicolay K. Magnetic resonance imaging in experimental models of brain disorders. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:1383–1402. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000100341.78607.EB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kochanek PM, Marion DW, Zhang W, Schiding JK, White M, Palmer AM, et al. Severe controlled cortical impact in rats: assessment of cerebral edema, blood flow, and contusion volume. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12:1015–1025. doi: 10.1089/neu.1995.12.1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Obenaus A, Robbins M, Blanco G, Galloway NR, Snissarenko E, Gillard E, et al. Multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging alterations in two rat models of mild neurotrauma. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1147–1160. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schuhmann MU, Stiller D, Skardelly M, Mokktarzadeh M, Thomas S, Brinker T, et al. Determination of contusion and oedema volume by MRI corresponds to changes of brain water content following controlled cortical impact injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;81:213–215. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6738-0_55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Unterberg AW, Stroop R, Thomale UW, Kiening KL, Pauser S, Vollmann W. Characterisation of brain edema following “controlled cortical impact injury” in rats. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1997;70:106–108. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6837-0_33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Assaf Y, Beit-Yannai E, Shohami E, Berman E, Cohen Y. Diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI of closed-head injury in rats: a time course study and correlation with histology. Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;15:77–85. doi: 10.1016/S0730-725X(96)00246-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Assaf Y, Holokovsky A, Berman E, Shapira Y, Shohami E, Cohen Y. Diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging following closed head injury in rats. J Neurotrauma. 1999;16:1165–1176. doi: 10.1089/neu.1999.16.1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Immonen RJ, Kharatishvili I, Niskanen JP, Grohn H, Pitkanen A, Grohn OH. Distinct MRI pattern in lesional and perilesional area after traumatic brain injury in rat—11 months follow-up. Exp Neurol. 2009;215:29–40. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moseley ME, Cohen Y, Mintorovitch J, Chileuitt L, Shimizu H, Kucharczyk J, et al. Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 1990;14:330–346. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910140218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Albensi BC, Knoblach SM, Chew BG, O’Reilly MP, Faden AI, Pekar JJ. Diffusion and high resolution MRI of traumatic brain injury in rats: time course and correlation with histology. Exp Neurol. 2000;162:61–72. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2000.7256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pasco A, Lemaire L, Franconi F, Lefur Y, Noury F, Saint-Andre JP, et al. Perfusional deficit and the dynamics of cerebral edemas in experimental traumatic brain injury using perfusion and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1321–1330. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Van Putten HP, Bouwhuis MG, Muizelaar JP, Lyeth BG, Berman RF. Diffusion-weighted imaging of edema following traumatic brain injury in rats: effects of secondary hypoxia. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:857–872. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J. 1994;66:259–267. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mac Donald CL, Dikranian K, Bayly P, Holtzman D, Brody D. Diffusion tensor imaging reliably detects experimental traumatic axonal injury and indicates approximate time of injury. J Neurosci. 2007;27:11869–11876. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3647-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li J, Li XY, Feng DF, Gu L. Quantitative evaluation of microscopic injury with diffusion tensor imaging in a rat model of diffuse axonal injury. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;33:933–945. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barbier EL, Lamalle L, Decorps M. Methodology of brain perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:496–520. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Calamante F, Thomas DL, Pell GS, Wiersma J, Turner R. Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19:701–735. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199907000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zaharchuk G. Theoretical basis of hemodynamic MR imaging techniques to measure cerebral blood volume, cerebral blood flow, and permeability. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1850–1858. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Forbes ML, Hendrich KS, Kochanek PM, Williams DS, Schiding JK, Wisniewski SR, et al. Assessment of cerebral blood flow and CO2 reactivity after controlled cortical impact by perfusion magnetic resonance imaging using arterial spin-labeling in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1997;17:865–74. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199708000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hayward NM, Tuunanen PI, Immonen R, Ndode-Ekane XE, Pitkanen A, Grohn O. Magnetic resonance imaging of regional hemodynamic and cerebrovascular recovery after lateral fluid-percussion brain injury in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011;31:166–177. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hendrich KS, Kochanek PM, Williams DS, Schiding JK, Marion DW, Ho C. Early perfusion after controlled cortical impact in rats: quantification by arterial spin-labeled MRI and the influence of spin-lattice relaxation time heterogeneity. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:673–681. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199910)42:4<673::AID-MRM8>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Immonen R, Heikkinen T, Tahtivaara L, Nurmi A, Stenius TK, Puolivali J, et al. Cerebral blood volume alterations in the perilesional areas in the rat brain after traumatic brain injury—comparison with behavioral outcome. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:1318–1328. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hayward NM, Immonen R, Tuunanen PI, Ndode-Ekane XE, Grohn O, Pitkanen A. Association of chronic vascular changes with functional outcome after traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:2203–2219. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Greve MW, Zink BJ. Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76:97–104. doi: 10.1002/msj.20104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Werner C, Engelhard K. Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:4–9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cederberg D, Siesjo P. What has inflammation to do with traumatic brain injury? Childs Nerv Syst. 2010;26:221–226. doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-1029-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lenzlinger PM, Morganti-Kossmann MC, Laurer HL, McIntosh TK. The duality of the inflammatory response to traumatic brain injury. Mol Neurobiol. 2001;24:169–181. doi: 10.1385/MN:24:1-3:169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Morganti-Kossmann MC, Satgunaseelan L, Bye N, Kossmann T. Modulation of immune response by head injury. Injury. 2007;38:1392–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schmidt OI, Heyde CE, Ertel W, Stahel PF. Closed head injury—an inflammatory disease? Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005;48:388–399. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shlosberg D, Benifla M, Kaufer D, Friedman A. Blood–brain barrier breakdown as a therapeutic target in traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:393–403. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Chopp M. Angiogenesis, neurogenesis and brain recovery of function following injury. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2010;11:298–308. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Runge VM, Muroff LR, Wells JW. Principles of contrast enhancement in the evaluation of brain diseases: an overview. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:5–13. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880070103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL, Henderson E, Knopp MV, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:223–232. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<223::AID-JMRI2>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nagaraja TN, Nagesh V, Ewing JR, Whitton PA, Fenstermacher JD, Knight RA. Step-down infusions of Gd-DTPA yield greater contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images of BBB damage in acute stroke than bolus injections. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:311–318. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood–brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging: 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med. 1991;17:357–367. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910170208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ewing JR, Knight RA, Nagaraja TN, Yee JS, Nagesh V, Whitton PA, et al. Patlak plots of Gd-DTPA MRI data yield blood–brain transfer constants concordant with those of 14C-sucrose in areas of blood–brain opening. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:283–292. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nagaraja TN, Knight RA, Ewing JR, Karki K, Nagesh V, Fenstermacher JD. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and repeated measurements of blood–brain barrier permeability to contrast agents. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;686:193–212. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-938-3_8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pillai DR, Dittmar MS, Baldaranov D, Heidemann RM, Henning EC, Schuierer G, et al. Cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury in rats—a 3T MRI study on biphasic blood–brain barrier opening and the dynamics of edema formation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29:1846–1855. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Strbian D, Durukan A, Pitkonen M, Marinkovic I, Tatlisumak E, Pedrono E, et al. The blood–brain barrier is continuously open for several weeks following transient focal cerebral ischemia. Neuroscience. 2008;153:175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Barzo P, Marmarou A, Fatouros P, Corwin F, Dunbar J. Magnetic resonance imaging-monitored acute blood–brain barrier changes in experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 1996;85:1113–1121. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.85.6.1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Beaumont A, Marmarou A, Hayasaki K, Barzo P, Fatouros P, Corwin F, et al. The permissive nature of blood brain barrier (BBB) opening in edema formation following traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2000;76:125–129. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6346-7_26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wei XE, Zhang YZ, Li YH, Li MH, Li WB. Dynamics of rabbit brain edema in focal lesion and perilesion area after traumatic brain injury: a MRI study. J Neurotrauma. 2011. doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Modo M, Hoehn M, Bulte JW. Cellular MR imaging. Mol Imaging. 2005;4:143–164. doi: 10.1162/15353500200505145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stoll G, Bendszus M. New approaches to neuroimaging of central nervous system inflammation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2010;23:282–286. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328337f4b5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Foley LM, Hitchens TK, Ho C, Janesko-Feldman KL, Melick JA, Bayir H, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of macrophage accumulation in mouse brain after experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26:1509–1519. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lanza GM, Winter PM, Caruthers SD, Morawski AM, Schmieder AH, Crowder KC, et al. Magnetic resonance molecular imaging with nanoparticles. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11:733–743. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sosnovik DE, Weissleder R. Emerging concepts in molecular MRI. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007;18:4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Strijkers GJ, Mulder WJ, van Tilborg GA, Nicolay K. MRI contrast agents: current status and future perspectives. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2007;7:291–305. doi: 10.2174/187152007780618135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Weissleder R, Mahmood U. Molecular imaging. Radiology. 2001;219:316–333. doi: 10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma19316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.McAteer MA, Akhtar AM, von Zur Muhlen C, Choudhury RP. An approach to molecular imaging of atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular inflammation using microparticles of iron oxide. Atherosclerosis. 2010;209:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mulder WJ, Strijkers GJ, van Tilborg GA, Griffioen AW, Nicolay K. Lipid-based nanoparticles for contrast-enhanced MRI and molecular imaging. NMR Biomed. 2006;19:142–164. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Torchilin VP. Recent advances with liposomes as pharmaceutical carriers. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4:145–160. doi: 10.1038/nrd1632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Barber PA, Foniok T, Kirk D, Buchan AM, Laurent S, Boutry S, et al. MR molecular imaging of early endothelial activation in focal ischemia. Ann Neurol. 2004;56:116–120. doi: 10.1002/ana.20162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.McAteer MA, Sibson NR, von Zur Muhlen C, Schneider JE, Lowe AS, Warrick N, et al. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of acute brain inflammation using microparticles of iron oxide. Nat Med. 2007;13:1253–1258. doi: 10.1038/nm1631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sibson NR, Blamire AM, Bernades-Silva M, Laurent S, Boutry S, Muller RN, et al. MRI detection of early endothelial activation in brain inflammation. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:248–252. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sipkins DA, Gijbels K, Tropper FD, Bednarski M, Li KC, Steinman L. ICAM-1 expression in autoimmune encephalitis visualized using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neuroimmunol. 2000;104:1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(99)00248-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chapon C, Franconi F, Lacoeuille F, Hindre F, Saulnier P, Benoit JP, et al. Imaging E-selectin expression following traumatic brain injury in the rat using a targeted USPIO contrast agent. MAGMA. 2009;22:167–174. doi: 10.1007/s10334-008-0161-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Arai K, Jin G, Navaratna D, Lo EH. Brain angiogenesis in developmental and pathological processes: neurovascular injury and angiogenic recovery after stroke. FEBS J. 2009;276:4644–4652. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07176.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Seevinck PR, Deddens LH, Dijkhuizen RM. Magnetic resonance imaging of brain angiogenesis after stroke. Angiogenesis. 2010;13:101–111. doi: 10.1007/s10456-010-9174-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wu EX, Tang H, Jensen JH. Applications of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents in the MR study of animal models. NMR Biomed. 2004;17:478–483. doi: 10.1002/nbm.923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lin CY, Chang C, Cheung WM, Lin MH, Chen JJ, Hsu CY, et al. Dynamic changes in vascular permeability, cerebral blood volume, vascular density, and size after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats: evaluation with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:1491–1501. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kou Z, Wu Z, Tong KA, Holshouser B, Benson RR, Hu J, et al. The role of advanced MR imaging findings as biomarkers of traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25:267–282. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181e54793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Chen H, Epstein J, Stern E. Neural plasticity after acquired brain injury: evidence from functional neuroimaging. PM R. 2010;2:S306–S312. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]