Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1986 Jul;83(13):4844–4848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.13.4844

Transposition of the maize controlling element “Activator” in tobacco

Barbara Baker *, Jeff Schell *, Horst Lörz *, Nina Fedoroff
PMCID: PMC323839  PMID: 16593722

Abstract

Transposition of the maize autonomous controlling element Activator (Ac) and a nonautonomous derivative, Dissociation (Ds), was investigated in tobacco cells. Tobacco protoplasts were transformed with Ti-plasmid vectors that contained Ac or Ds flanked by short maize wx gene sequences. The structures of the elements and surrounding wx and T-DNA sequences were investigated in nine Ac and five Ds tobacco transformants by digestion with restriction enzymes, Southern blotting, and hybridization using specific probes. In four of the nine Ac transformed lines, Ac had excised from its original position in the T-DNA and inserted at new sites in the tobacco genome. Ds did not excise from its original T-DNA position in any of the transformants examined. Two Ac fragments and cellular flanking sequences were cloned from a line of tobacco in which Ac had transposed. Fragments, comprised of sequences flanking the newly integrated Ac elements, were used as hybridization probes to normal tobacco DNA and to the tobacco DNA from which they were isolated. The Ac copies were integrated into repetitive tobacco DNA sequences. Two tobacco fragments containing empty Wx donor sites were cloned from the DNA of the same Ac transformant and sequenced. Both sequences are among the types of excision products observed to result from Ac-catalyzed excision events in maize. Our results indicate that the maize controlling element Ac is capable of self-catalyzed transposition in tobacco.

Keywords: plant transformation, transposon tagging, Ti plasmid

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chandler V. L., Walbot V. DNA modification of a maize transposable element correlates with loss of activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(6):1767–1771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.6.1767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Döring H. P., Tillmann E., Starlinger P. DNA sequence of the maize transposable element Dissociation. Nature. 1984 Jan 12;307(5947):127–130. doi: 10.1038/307127a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fedoroff N. V., Furtek D. B., Nelson O. E. Cloning of the bronze locus in maize by a simple and generalizable procedure using the transposable controlling element Activator (Ac). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jun;81(12):3825–3829. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.12.3825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fedoroff N., Wessler S., Shure M. Isolation of the transposable maize controlling elements Ac and Ds. Cell. 1983 Nov;35(1):235–242. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90226-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Geiser M., Weck E., Döring H. P., Werr W., Courage-Tebbe U., Tillmann E., Starlinger P. Genomic clones of a wild-type allele and a transposable element-induced mutant allele of the sucrose synthase gene of Zea mays L. EMBO J. 1982;1(11):1455–1460. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01337.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McCLINTOCK B. Chromosome organization and genic expression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1951;16:13–47. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1951.016.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Messing J., Vieira J. A new pair of M13 vectors for selecting either DNA strand of double-digest restriction fragments. Gene. 1982 Oct;19(3):269–276. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(82)90016-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pohlman R. F., Fedoroff N. V., Messing J. The nucleotide sequence of the maize controlling element Activator. Cell. 1984 Jun;37(2):635–643. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90395-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Saedler H., Nevers P. Transposition in plants: a molecular model. EMBO J. 1985 Mar;4(3):585–590. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03670.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shure M., Wessler S., Fedoroff N. Molecular identification and isolation of the Waxy locus in maize. Cell. 1983 Nov;35(1):225–233. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90225-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sutton W. D., Gerlach W. L., Peacock W. J., Schwartz D. Molecular analysis of ds controlling element mutations at the adh1 locus of maize. Science. 1984 Mar 23;223(4642):1265–1268. doi: 10.1126/science.223.4642.1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Van Haute E., Joos H., Maes M., Warren G., Van Montagu M., Schell J. Intergeneric transfer and exchange recombination of restriction fragments cloned in pBR322: a novel strategy for the reversed genetics of the Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. EMBO J. 1983;2(3):411–417. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01438.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zambryski P., Joos H., Genetello C., Leemans J., Montagu M. V., Schell J. Ti plasmid vector for the introduction of DNA into plant cells without alteration of their normal regeneration capacity. EMBO J. 1983;2(12):2143–2150. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01715.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES