Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jan;42(1):61–64. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.023

Patterns of Blunt Use Among Rural Young Adult African-American Men

Catherine F Sinclair 1, Herman R Foushee 1, Jesse S Pevear III 1, Isabel C Scarinci 1, William R Carroll 1
PMCID: PMC3244685  NIHMSID: NIHMS339154  PMID: 22176848

Abstract

Background

Blunts are hollowed-out cigars or leaf tobacco filled with marijuana. Use of blunts has increased since the 1990s and, in 2005, 3.5% of all American youth were estimated to have used blunts in the past month. Blunt smokers may have greater odds of cannabis and tobacco dependency and are at risk of smoking-related diseases. Previous studies have suggested that blunt use is more common among blacks, older teens, and men. However, data pertaining to blunt use in non-adolescent African-American populations are scarce.

Purpose

(1) To assess patterns of blunt use among young adult African-American men aged 19–30 years residing in five rural Black Belt counties in Alabama; (2) To compare these data with those from tobacco cigarette smokers within the same study population.

Methods

Verbal, face-to-face interviewer-administered survey of 415 participants collected and analyzed between December 2008 and February 2011.

Results

159 respondents (38.3%) smoked cigarettes and 45 smoked blunts (10.8%). Of blunt smokers, 33 also smoked cigarettes (73.3%). Use of blunts was prevalent among unemployed, single men, and occupational blunt use was uncommon. Factors important in the initiation, maintenance and cessation of product use were similar for blunt and cigarette smokers, especially product use and acceptance by friends. Legal concerns were an important factor facilitating blunt cessation.

Conclusions

Blunt use is relatively common among male African Americans aged 19–30 years and is frequently associated with concomitant cigarette use. Tobacco control efforts in this male African-American population should also address blunt usage.

Introduction

Blunts are hollowed-out cigars or leaf tobacco filled with marijuana.1 Use of blunts has increased since the 1990s and in 2005, 3.5% of all American youth aged 12–17 years were estimated to have used blunts in the past month.2 Blunt smokers may have greater odds of being dependent on cannabis and tobacco and are at risk for smoking-related diseases.1,3 Prior studies on blunt use in adolescent populations of mixed ethnicities suggest that blunt use is more common among blacks, older teens and men/boys; however, data pertaining to blunt use in non-adolescent African-American populations are scarce.1,2,4 The Black Belt counties of Alabama, named for the rich dark soil that supported the agricultural industry of an earlier era, are predominantly African-American.5,6

The primary aim of this study was twofold: (1) to assess patterns of blunt use among young adult African-American men in five rural Black Belt counties in Alabama, and (2) to compare these data with those from tobacco cigarette smokers within the same study population. This is an extension of a previous study reporting the prevalence and general demographics of tobacco and nontobacco use for the same African-American population.7

Methods

Sample design, survey development and data collection have been previously described and are summarized below.7

Sample

Between December 2008 and March 2009, interviewer-administered surveys were completed among self-identified African-American men, aged 19–30 years, in five of the Black Belt counties of rural Alabama. These inclusion criteria were chosen because: (1) tobacco use and tobacco-related health disparities are more prevalent in men;8 (2) Studies have shown that African Americans typically initiate use in their late teens;9,10 (3) the Black Belt counties have disparately high rates of tobacco-related disease;10,11 and (4) the five counties are demographically representative of the Black Belt region.

Sample size calculations assumed a prevalence rate of 25% and determined that 400 subjects would provide 95% CIs of 20.8%–29.2%.6 Participants were stratified by income (above and below poverty level) and educational level (12th grade above/below) using census data to estimate representation in the stratification table. Distribution of actual survey respondents within the stratification table was monitored to ensure representative sampling of the Black Belt counties.

Survey

Survey questions included: (1) demographics; (2) tobacco, alternative tobacco and marijuana use including frequency, products, patterns of use; and (3) sociocultural factors associated with product use, including perceived harm. Many survey items originated from the “Question Inventory on Tobacco” (QIT) which lists over 3400 validated and previously administered survey items.12

Data Collection

Data collection utilized the infrastructure of a study funded by the National Cancer Institute - Deep South Network for Cancer Control (DSN).13 Community Health Advisors (CHAs) were trained in survey administration and asked to identify young men from their respective communities who would fit inclusion criteria. CHAs recruited participants, administered surveys verbally, face-to-face, and recorded responses. Educational levels and employment status of CHAs was known by University of Alabama at Birmingham program administrators and represented a reasonable cross-section of the target communities. Thus, recruitment among natural acquaintances provided a reasonable cross-sectional sample. Advertising and census tract–based recruiting were deemed unnecessary. The University of Alabama at Birmingham IRB approved the research protocol.

Data Analysis

Between November 2010 and February 2011, surveys from 415 participants were analyzed. Current smokers were defined as those who had smoked in the 7 days preceding survey administration. For comparative data analyses of cigarette versus blunt smokers, data from participants who smoked both cigarettes and blunts were analyzed with data from participants smoking blunts alone and compared to data from participants who smoked cigarettes alone. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 14.0. Bivariate analyses used chi-squares and t-tests to examine group differences. Significance levels were set at 0.05.

Results

Prevalence

Of the 415 respondents, 159 currently smoked cigarettes (38.3%) and 45 smoked blunts (10.8%). Of blunt smokers, 33 also smoked cigarettes (73.3%), with cigarettes being the first product used by 23 blunt users (69.7%). None of those respondents who smoked both products stated that blunts were the first product used. Median number of blunts smoked per day was three (range 1–12) and average age of initiation for blunt smoking was 17 years (+/− 2.8). When compared with participants who smoked cigarettes but not blunts, fewer participants who smoked blunts were employed (26.7% vs 48.4%, p=0.012) and more blunt smokers were single (p=0.032) (Table 1). Occupational smoking was less prevalent among blunt than cigarette users (3.8% vs 20.9%, p=0.045). The majority of blunt smokers (93%) stated that they had friends who also smoked blunts.

Table 1.

Demographics of blunt and cigarette smokers

Blunts, n (%) Cigarettes, n (%) p
Employment
 Currently employed 12 (26.7) 59 (48.4) 0.012
 Unemployed 33 (73.3) 63 (51.6)

Education >13 years 38.2 16.8 0.082
Marital status
 Single 38 (86.4) 86 (69.9) 0.032
 Partnered 37 (30.1) 6 (13.6)
Poverty
 Above Poverty 15 (33.3) 47 (37.6) 0.285
 Below Poverty 24 (53.3) 51 (40.8)

Health Insurance
 Yes 19 (42.2) 69 (57.5) 0.080
 No 26 (57.8) 51 (42.5)
Mean age of smoking initiation, years (SD) 24.5 (3.8) 23.9 (3.3) 0.309

Initiation

Reasons given for initiation of blunt smoking were similar to those given for initiation of cigarette smoking and included boredom (62.2%), friends smoking blunts (57.8%) and stress relief (42.2%) (Table 2). At the time of initiation of cigarette or blunt smoking, cigarette smokers were more likely than blunt smokers to have had family members who smoked their particular product (79.0% vs 47.7%, p=0.0001); however, rates of product use among friends were similar for cigarette and blunt smokers (84.0% vs 93.2%, p=0.129).

Table 2.

Factors influencing initiation, maintenance, and cessation of blunt versus cigarette use

Blunts, n (%) Cigarettes, n (%)
Initiating factors
 Boredom 28 (62.2) 84 (52.8)
 Friends also smoking 26 (57.8) 86 (54.1)
 Stress relief 19 (42.2) 61 (38.4)
 Family also smoking 9 (20.0) 53 (33.3)
 Need to show independence 4 (8.9) 12 (7.5)
 Media influence 3 (6.7) 20 (12.6)
Maintenance factors
 Use accepted by friends 29 (64.4) 96 (60.4)
 Easy accessibility 27 (60.0) 112 (70.4)
 Media 12 (26.7) 71 (44.7)
 Celebrities using blunts 9 (20.0) 46 (28.9)
 Use accepted by family 8 (17.8) 58 (36.5)
Factors promoting cessation
 Health effects 43 (95.6) 167 (96.9)
 Legal concerns 25 (55.6) ---
 Cost 18 (40.0) 69 (43.4)
 Influence of family 17 (37.8) 73 (45.9)
 Image 10 (22.2) 57 (35.8)
 Influence of significant other 8 (17.8) 49 (30.8)
 Influence of friends 8 (17.8) 47 (29.6)
Obstacles to cessation
 Stress relief 25 (55.6) 69 (43.4)
 Physical craving 13 (28.9) 74 (46.5)
 Family / friend reactions 5 (11.1) 13 (8.2)
 Self-image 3 (6.7) 9 (5.7)
 Loss of sense of independence 0 2 (1.3)

Maintenance

Product acceptance by friends (64.4%) and ease of accessibility (60.0%) were important factors in the maintenance of smoking behaviors for both cigarette and blunt smokers (Table 2). Regarding product accessibility, 62.7% of respondents claimed that access to blunts was easy or very easy and over 70% felt it was easy for minors to obtain blunts. Most cigarette (61.9%) and blunt (55.6%) smokers felt they were more likely to smoke cigarettes or blunts respectively if their friends also smoked that product (p=0.462).

Cessation

Health effects (cigarette and blunt smokers) and legal concerns (blunt smokers only) were the most frequently cited reasons important enough to make participants want to stop smoking their particular product (Table 2). When asked specifically about harm to health, 52.9% of respondents believed smoking blunts was harmful. Stress release and physical craving were identified as the biggest obstacles to smoking cessation by both cigarette and blunt smokers; however, more cigarette than blunt smokers felt that physical craving was an obstacle to cessation (46.5% vs 28.9%, p=0.04). The converse was true for stress relief (55.6% vs 43.4%, p=0.04).

With respect to cancer causation, 50% of blunt smokers believed smoking blunts could cause cancer and 50% were unsure or disagreed. However, 48% felt smoking blunts was safer than cigarettes for reasons including that they are more natural (76.0%), less addictive (63.6%), and have fewer additives (65.2%).

Discussion

Use of marijuana, blunts and alternative tobacco products in young adult populations has increased since the 1990s and may pose a risk to the success of tobacco control efforts.14,15 In the current study, 11% of African-American men aged 19–30 years smoked blunts, with prevalence being highest for single, unemployed men. Prior studies addressing blunt use in adolescent populations aged 12–17 years have reported highest usage among blacks and correlated blunt use with lower high school grade averages and higher truancy rates.1,2,16 These factors may contribute to the higher observed unemployment rate in African-American blunt smokers aged 19–30 years.

Occupational smoking was less common among blunt than cigarette smokers in the current study, possibly reflecting the higher unemployment rates for blunts smokers and the fact that legal concerns were frequently cited as a reason for blunt smoking cessation. Friends smoking blunts were important in initiation and maintenance of blunt use in accordance with findings from a major ethnographic study of blunts/marijuana use where the majority of blunt smokers preferred to consume in a group setting.17

Smoking marijuana in blunts is thought to increase the physiologic risks of marijuana smoking, and blunt smokers have greater rates of marijuana and tobacco dependence.3,16 This is in accordance with the current series where most blunt smokers also smoked cigarettes (73.3%). Interestingly, initiation, maintenance and cessation factors for product use were similar for cigarette and blunt smokers, with stress release and physical craving being identified as the biggest obstacles to smoking cessation for both groups. Anti-tobacco campaigns employing stress management and relaxation techniques may thus also facilitate blunt-cessation efforts in this population.

Limitations of this study include the focused survey sample of African-American men aged 19–30 years, which limits applicability of results to women, older adults and youths, and the small sample size. Future directions include the design of culturally relevant intervention strategies for tobacco and marijuana among rural African-American men.

Conclusion

Blunt use is relatively common among African-American men aged 19–30 years living in the Black Belt region of Alabama. Concomitant cigarette use is high. Tobacco control efforts in this male African-American population should also address blunt usage, including information on the adverse health effects of smoking blunts.

Acknowledgments

This project was an NCI-funded pilot project associated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham’s “Deep South Network”; an NCI-funded Community Network Program 3U01CA114619-04.

Footnotes

No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Golub A, Johnson BD, Dunlap E. The growth in marijuana use among American youths during the 1990s and the extent of blunt smoking. J Ethnicity Subs Abuse. 2005;4(3–4):1–21. doi: 10.1300/J233v04n03_01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Use of Marijuana and Blunts among Adolescents: 2005. [23rd July 2011];The NSDUH Report 2007. Available at: http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k7/mjBlunts/mjBlunts.pdf.
  • 3.Timberlake DS. A Comparison of drug use and dependence between blunt smokers and other cannabis users. Substance Use Misuse. 2009;44(3):401–15. doi: 10.1080/10826080802347651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Soldz S, Dorsey E. Youth attitudes and beliefs toward alternative tobacco products: cigars, bidis, and kreteks. Health Education & Behavior. 2005;32(4):549–66. doi: 10.1177/1090198105276219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dransfield MT, Bailey WC. COPD: racial disparities in susceptibility, treatment, and outcomes. Clin Chest Med. 2006;27:463–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2006.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Health ADoP. Birmingham: 2007. Death and Death Rates by County, Gender, Race. http://adph.org/healthstats/ [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carroll W, Foushee HR, Hardy CM, Floyd T, Sinclair C, Scarinci I. Tobacco Use among Rural African American Young Adult Males. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 doi: 10.1177/0194599811404968. Available at: http://oto.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/04/25/0194599811404968. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Prevention, CDC. Atlanta: 1998. [5th January 2011]. Smoking and Tobacco Use: Highlights: African Americans and Tobacco. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/1998/highlights/african_americans/ [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leistikow B. Lung cancer rates as an index of tobacco smoke exposures: validation against black male approximate non-lung cancer death rates, 1969–2000. Prev Med. 2004;38:511–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vaughn M, Wallace J, Perron B, Copeland V, Howard M. Does marijuana use serve as a gateway to cigarette use for high-risk African-American youth? Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2008;34:782–91. doi: 10.1080/00952990802455477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tullis LM, Dupont R, Frost-Pineda K, Gold MS. Marijuana and tobacco: a major connection? Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2003;22:51–62. doi: 10.1300/J069v22n03_05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Smoking and Tobacco Use (Question Inventory on Tobacco) [21st January 2011];CDC. 2009 Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/qit/
  • 13.Lisovicz N, Johnson E, Higginbotham J, Downey JA, Hardy CM, Fouad MN, et al. The Deep South Network for cancer control. Building a community infrastructure to reduce cancer health disparities. Cancer. 2006;107:1971–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. [10th March 2011];Tobacco use among adults—U S Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2006 55:1145–8. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5542a1.htm. [PubMed]
  • 15.Vander Weg MW, Peterson AL, Ebbert JO, Debon M, Klesges RC, Haddock CK. Prevalence of alternative forms of tobacco use in a population of young adult military recruits. Addict Behav. 2008;33(1):69–82. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Soldz S, Huyser DJ, Dorsey E. The cigar as a drug delivery device: Youth use of blunts. Addiction. 2003;98:1379–1386. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00492.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Delnevo CD, Hrywna M. The relationship of cigars, marijuana, and blunts to adolescent bidi use. Public Health Reports. 2006;121(5):603–8. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES