Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2011 Dec 27;6(12):e29673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029673

Reduced Cortical Thickness in Mental Retardation

Yuanchao Zhang 1,#, Yan Wu 1,#, Maohu Zhu 2,#, Chao Wang 1, Jiaojian Wang 1, Yun Zhang 1, Chunshui Yu 3, Tianzi Jiang 1,2,*
Editor: Francisco José Esteban4
PMCID: PMC3246471  PMID: 22216343

Abstract

Mental retardation is a developmental disorder associated with impaired cognitive functioning and deficits in adaptive behaviors. Many studies have addressed white matter abnormalities in patients with mental retardation, while the changes of the cerebral cortex have been studied to a lesser extent. Quantitative analysis of cortical integrity using cortical thickness measurement may provide new insights into the gray matter pathology. In this study, cortical thickness was compared between 13 patients with mental retardation and 26 demographically matched healthy controls. We found that patients with mental retardation had significantly reduced cortical thickness in multiple brain regions compared with healthy controls. These regions include the bilateral lingual gyrus, the bilateral fusiform gyrus, the bilateral parahippocampal gyrus, the bilateral temporal pole, the left inferior temporal gyrus, the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex and the right precentral gyrus. The observed cortical thickness reductions might be the anatomical substrates for the impaired cognitive functioning and deficits in adaptive behaviors in patients with mental retardation. Cortical thickness measurement might provide a sensitive prospective surrogate marker for clinical trials of neuroprotective medications.

Introduction

Mental retardation, also called developmental delay or mental delay, is a developmental disorder characterized by sub-average cognitive functioning and deficits in adaptive behaviors. This disorder is generally taken as corresponding to an intelligence quotient (IQ) <70 and has a prevalence of about 2–3% in the general population[1]. The underlying cause of mental retardation often remains unclear despite extensive clinical examination and investigations. Based on in vivo magnetic resonance imaging techniques, many researches have been conducted to identify brain structural abnormalities in mental retardation patients. Most of these studies were performed qualitatively and focused on the white matter alterations in mental retardation patients[2], [3], [4], while quantitative analysis of changes of the cerebral cortex have been done to a lesser extent [5]. Quantitative studies are necessary to further investigate the brain structural abnormalities in patients with mental retardation. According to previous neuropathologic researches, mental retardation pathologies are associated with neuronal losses and spine dysgenesis in multiple cortical regions [6], [7], [8]. Therefore, quantitative maps of cortical integrity of the mental retardation patients may contribute in understanding the pathogenesis of the disorder.

By manual outlining of region of interest (ROI), a previous study documented significantly reduced volume in patients with mental retardation when compared with normal controls in bilateral prefrontal lobes and bilateral temporal lobes [9]. However, ROI-based methods need a priori to define the region of interest and limit the identification of changes elsewhere in the cerebral cortex [5]. Moreover, manual outlining of the ROIs is labor-intensive and might introduce user bias. Given the above consideration, Moorhead et al. employed an automated methodology, voxel-based morphometry (VBM) [10], to further investigate this issue [11], [12]. In their study, significant reductions of regional gray matter volume were observed in the occipital lobes, the frontal lobes, the right temporal lobe and the bilateral parietal lobe in mental retardation patients. Interpreting such results however is difficult, given that the smoothing step of VBM can involve structures that are in close spatial proximity but not closely anatomically connected [13]. In addition, interpretation of the differences obtained by VBM can be difficult since it does not measure the actual physical characteristic directly [13].

Recently, advanced image processing approaches have been developed to measure cortical thickness by calculating the distance between the gray matter and white matter surfaces across the entire cortical mantle. Indeed, cortical thickness is a more direct and biologically meaningful measurement, which could reflect the size, density and arrangement of cells [14]. In previous neuroimaging studies, cortical thickness has been used to investigate structural changes in the neurodevelopmental process in healthy subjects [15], [16] as well as pathological changes in several diseased populations[13], [17]. Relationships between cortical thickness and IQ have also been explored by many researchers to determine the neuroanatomical substrates of human intelligence [14], [18]. Therefore, in this study, cortical thickness measurement was adopted to investigate cortical abnormalities in mental retardation. We contrasted the cortical thickness between normal controls and patients with mental retardation using a surface-based generalized linear model (GLM) tool to map group contrasts on a vertex-by-vertex basis. Based on previous studies [9], [11], we hypothesized that patients with mental retardation would exhibit cortical thinning in multiple brain regions including the occipital lobe and the temporal lobe.

Results

Compared with normal controls, only reduced cortical thickness was observed in multiple brain regions in patients with mental retardation. We found six regions of difference with thresholds of P<0.05 (corrected) and cluster size > = 100 vertices. These regions included the bilateral lingual gyrus, the bilateral fusiform gyrus, the bilateral parahippocampal gyrus, the bilateral temporal pole, the left inferior temporal gyrus, the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex and the right precentral gyrus (Table 1). For visualization, regions of difference were projected onto the pial surface of the average template. (Figure 1)

Table 1. Regions with reduced cortical thickness in mental retardation.

Cluster ID Anatomic regions Side Cluster size (vertices) Peak P-value MNI coordinates (x, y, z)
1 fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, lingual gyrus, inferior temporal cortex Left 3982 0.00036 −27.9, −49.1, −7.0
2 temporal pole Left 1101 0.00842 −19.5, −0.7, −26.3
3 temporal pole Right 1113 0.00940 23.1, 3.0, −40.4
4 fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, lingual gyrus Right 1815 0.00486 23.6, −46.3, −11.3
5 lateral orbitofrontal cortex Right 850 0.00419 31.3, 24.7, −5.2
6 precentral gyrus Right 280 0.02714 56.7, −1.4, 44.8

Figure 1. Brain regions with cortical thickness reductions in mental retardation and distribution of average cortical thickness (in mm) of each corresponding region.

Figure 1

The results were corrected for multiple comparisons (P<0.05, the vertex-based RFT correction). The color bar indicates the corrected P-values. The integers are the cluster IDs corresponding to those of Table 1. Normal controls, NC; Patients with mental retardation, PMR.

Discussion

In this study, we used a surface-based approach to explore the differences in the cortical thickness between patients with mental retardation and demographically matched healthy controls. Compared with healthy controls, significant cortical thickness reductions were observed in multiple brain regions in mental retardation patients. These regions included the bilateral lingual gyrus, the bilateral fusiform gyrus, the bilateral parahippocampal gyrus, the bilateral temporal pole, the left inferior temporal gyrus, the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex and the right precentral gyrus.

Our finding of reduced cortical thickness in mental retardation is consistent with previous studies. For instance, Moorhead et al. reported reduced gray matter volume in multiple brain regions in patients with mental retardation, including the parahippocampal gyrus, the fusiform gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus and precentral gyrus [12]. Lower regional gray matter volumes have also been reported in the parahippocampal gyrus and precental gyrus in patients with fragile X syndrome, compared with typically developing boys [19]. In another study on human intelligence, Narr et al. reported positive correlations between IQ and cortical thickness in bilateral prefrontal, bilateral temporal cortices (inferior temporal, fusiform, and parahippocampal cortices) and right extrastriate occipital (lingual gyrus) cortical regions in healthy subjects[14], which, to some extent, support our finding. In addition, these regions have been implicated in the functioning of working memory. Briefly, the parahippocampal gyrus and the lingual gyrus have been reported to be involved in spatial information processing as well as novelty and memory encoding [20], [21], [22]. Activations in the parahippocampal gyrus, the lingual gyrus, the fusiform gyrus and the inferior temporal gyrus have been documented in many working memory studies [23], [24], [25]. Therefore, the observed cortical thickness reductions in these regions might be associated with the deficits in working memory, which were frequently reported in mental retardation [26], [27], [28], [29].

Cortical thickness reductions correspond to substantial pathological changes. Measuring the cortical thickness may provide important information about the integrity of the cerebral cortex. In mental retardation, cortical thickness reductions could result from various mechanisms. Firstly, the cortical thickness reductions might be due to primary developmental histopathological abnormalities, including defective neuronal generation or migration, cell density, and microcolumnar changes [30]. Classically, the central nervous system development is divided into three major stages: neuronal generation, migration, and differentiation/maturation[31]. Aberrations in one or more of these stages can have long-term consequences for the integrity of higher cognitive abilities [31], [32]. Many previous studies have reported developmental abnormalities in patients with mental retardation. In a review, Schaefer et al. described the common brain malformations associated with developmental abnormalities in patients with mental retardation[30]. In patients with unclassified mental retardation, many studies reported reductions in number and length of dendritic branches as well as aberrant morphology and number of dendritic spines[7], [8]. Additionally, abnormal dendritic spine characteristics have also been observed in both fragile X knockout mice and patients with fragile X syndrome [6], [33], [34]. Alternatively, the observed cortical thickness reductions in patients with mental retardation could be a secondary consequence of a lack of input to specific brain areas resulting from primary white matter abnormalities[35]. Using various neuroimaging techniques, white matter abnormalities have been intensively investigated in patients with mental retardation. For instance, many MRI studies have reported anomalies of corpus callosum and alterations of the white matter in patients with mental retardation [3], [4]. Diffusion tensor imaging studies also showed that patients with mental retardation have significantly lower fractional anisotropy (FA) than healthy controls in many white matter fiber tracts[36], [37]. Therefore, focal damage to the white matter and its connectivities in mental retardation patients could be responsible for the cortical thickness reductions in appropriate regions of the cerebral cortex.

For decades, it has been known that mental retardation may result from both harmful environmental and genetic factors during the developmental process [38]. Both of these factors may have an effect on the cortical thickness. Although some environmental factors that are often involved in mental retardation have been excluded in this study, it is still possible that other harmful environmental factors might have an effect on the cortical thickness [31], [32], [39]. On the other hand, genetic factors may play a critical role in abnormal cortical development. In fact, mutations in some genes implicated in mental retardation, such as fragile X mental retardation 1 gene, oligophrenin 1, p21-activated kinase, and rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 6, have been found to directly and indirectly affect laminar organization, axonal guidance, and proper connectivity [1], [38], [40], which, in turn, might have an effect on the cortical thickness in patients with mental retardation. From this cross-sectional observational study, it is not possible to determine which factor plays a leading role in causing the cortical thickness reductions. Future studies will need to discriminate the role of specific genetic and/or environmental factors in the development of the cortical thickness reductions in mental retardation by using samples with higher homogeneity or animal experiments.

In conclusion, we found significantly reduced cortical thickness in multiple brain regions in patients with mental retardation compared with healthy controls. The observed cortical thickness reductions in these regions might be the anatomical substrates for the sub-average functioning and deficits in adaptive behaviors in mental retardation.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

All subjects of this study were chosen from subjects who participated in a study by Yu et al.[36]. The fifteen patients with idiopathic mental retardation are described in detail by Yu et al. [36] and two of them were discarded due to segmentation errors. In brief, the mental retardation patients were recruited from Beijing Huiling community service for people with disabilities and Beijing Lizhi recovery center for people with disabilities. All patients were diagnosed by an experienced psychiatrist according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria for mental retardation: (1) IQ of approximately 70 or below on an individually administered IQ test; (2) at least two affected areas: communication, self-care, home living, social/ interpersonal skills, use of community resources, self-direction, functional academic skills, work, leisure, health and safety; (3) onset prior to age 18 years. Exclusion criteria included prenatal events (such as congenital infections, prolonged maternal fever in the first trimester, exposure to anticonvulsants or alcohol, and untreated maternal phenylketonuria), notable dysmorphology, near-drowning, traumatic brain injury, phenylketonuria, hypothyroidism and disorders known to be associated with mental retardation, such as neurofibromatosis and tuberous sclerosis. Patients with visible brain lesions on conventional magnetic resonance images were also excluded from this study. For comparison with the 13 mental retardation patients, 26 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects were included. FSIQ score was measured by means of the Chinese Revised Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Table 2).

Table 2. Demographics of the samples.

Normal controls (n = 26) Mental retardation patients (n = 13)
Age (years) 23.4(4.6)* 22.6(2.3)*
Sex (male/female) 16/10* 8/5*
FSIQ 108.1(8.6) 50.0(10.0)

Data are mean (SD).

*no significant difference between groups (p>0.05).

Ethics Statement

After a full explanation, parents of the mental retardation patients and all of the healthy controls gave voluntary and informed consent in written form according to the standards set by the ethical committee of Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, who specifically approved this study.

MRI Data Acquisition

Three dimensional structural MRI scans were obtained on a 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance scanner (Trio system; Siemens Magnetom scanner, Erlangen, Germany) with magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo. Detailed scan parameters were as follows: repetition time  = 2000 ms, echo time  = 2.6 ms, slice thickness  = 1mm, no gaps, flip angle  = 9°, matrix  = 256×224, field of view  = 256×224 mm2, 1×1 mm2 in-plane resolution.

Preprocessing

Each scan was processed using FreeSurfer (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ ) using the volume and surface pipeline [41], [42]. Starting from the segmentation of the white matter and the tessellation of the grey/white matter boundary, an initial surface was obtained after automated topological correction. This surface was used as the initial shape for the deformable model that was used to reconstruct the pial surface. When all of the surfaces had been reconstructed, the cortical thickness was computed. The thickness was measured in the native space of each subject. The thickness was defined at each point on the pial surface (as well as its counterpart on the grey/white matter surface because of the one-to-one correspondence) as the mean of the two shortest distances [43] ; one was from the point on the pial surface to the grey/white surface, and the other was from the point on the grey/white matter surface to the pial surface. To compare cortical thicknesses point by point and to visualize the statistical results, the establishment of point correspondence across subjects in a standard surface-based coordinate system was required. Surface-based registration was used to build an average template, and all of the individual reconstructed cortical surfaces were aligned to this template [44]. Then, the cortical thickness data were resampled for each subject. Prior to statistical analysis, a heat kernel with a 30-mm width was used to smooth the cortical thickness maps to increase the signal-to-noise ratio and to improve the ability to detect morphometric variations [45].

Statistical Analyses

Vertex-by-vertex contrasts of cortical thickness were performed for normal controls vs patients with mental retardation using SurfStat package (http://www.math.mcgill.ca/keith/surfstat/). Specifically, each contrast was entered into a vertex-by-vertex GLM including diagnosis, sex, and exact age as covariates. Subsequently, a corrected vertex-wise P value was obtained using random filed theory [46]. The level of significance for vertices was set at a conservative, surface-wide P<0.05 after multiple comparison correction. Only clusters with a minimum of 100 vertices were reported.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81101000 to Dr. Zhang). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ramakers GJ. Rho proteins, mental retardation and the cellular basis of cognition. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:191–199. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)02118-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Soto-Ares G, Joyes B, Lemaitre MP, Vallee L, Pruvo JP. MRI in children with mental retardation. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33:334–345. doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-0891-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Spencer MD, Gibson RJ, Moorhead TW, Keston PM, Hoare P, et al. Qualitative assessment of brain anomalies in adolescents with mental retardation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2691–2697. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Widjaja E, Nilsson D, Blaser S, Raybaud C. White matter abnormalities in children with idiopathic developmental delay. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:589–595. doi: 10.1080/02841850801950087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Yu C, Lin L, Li C, et al. Reduced cortical folding in mental retardation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1063–1067. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Irwin SA, Patel B, Idupulapati M, Harris JB, Crisostomo RA, et al. Abnormal dendritic spine characteristics in the temporal and visual cortices of patients with fragile-X syndrome: a quantitative examination. Am J Med Genet. 2001;98:161–167. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20010115)98:2<161::aid-ajmg1025>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kaufmann WE, Moser HW. Dendritic anomalies in disorders associated with mental retardation. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:981–991. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.10.981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Purpura DP. Dendritic spine “dysgenesis” and mental retardation. Science. 1974;186:1126–1128. doi: 10.1126/science.186.4169.1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sanderson TL, Best JJ, Doody GA, Owens DG, Johnstone EC. Neuroanatomy of comorbid schizophrenia and learning disability: a controlled study. Lancet. 1999;354:1867–1871. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)01049-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry--the methods. Neuroimage. 2000;11:805–821. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moorhead TW, Job DE, Spencer MD, Whalley HC, Johnstone EC, et al. Empirical comparison of maximal voxel and non-isotropic adjusted cluster extent results in a voxel-based morphometry study of comorbid learning disability with schizophrenia. Neuroimage. 2005;28:544–552. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Moorhead TW, Job DE, Whalley HC, Sanderson TL, Johnstone EC, et al. Voxel-based morphometry of comorbid schizophrenia and learning disability: analyses in normalized and native spaces using parametric and nonparametric statistical methods. Neuroimage. 2004;22:188–202. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Singh V, Chertkow H, Lerch JP, Evans AC, Dorr AE, et al. Spatial patterns of cortical thinning in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2006;129:2885–2893. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Narr KL, Woods RP, Thompson PM, Szeszko P, Robinson D, et al. Relationships between IQ and regional cortical gray matter thickness in healthy adults. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:2163–2171. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shaw P, Kabani NJ, Lerch JP, Eckstrand K, Lenroot R, et al. Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 2008;28:3586–3594. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5309-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Leonard CM, Welcome SE, Kan E, et al. Longitudinal mapping of cortical thickness and brain growth in normal children. J Neurosci. 2004;24:8223–8231. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1798-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shaw P, Eckstrand K, Sharp W, Blumenthal J, Lerch JP, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:19649–19654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707741104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shaw P, Greenstein D, Lerch J, Clasen L, Lenroot R, et al. Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature. 2006;440:676–679. doi: 10.1038/nature04513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hoeft F, Lightbody AA, Hazlett HC, Patnaik S, Piven J, et al. Morphometric spatial patterns differentiating boys with fragile X syndrome, typically developing boys, and developmentally delayed boys aged 1 to 3 years. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:1087–1097. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.9.1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Menon V, White CD, Eliez S, Glover GH, Reiss AL. Analysis of a distributed neural system involved in spatial information, novelty, and memory processing. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;11:117–129. doi: 10.1002/1097-0193(200010)11:2&#x0003c;117::AID-HBM50&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maguire EA, Frith CD, Burgess N, Donnett JG, O'Keefe J. Knowing where things are parahippocampal involvement in encoding object locations in virtual large-scale space. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998;10:61–76. doi: 10.1162/089892998563789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bohbot VD, Allen JJ, Nadel L. Memory deficits characterized by patterns of lesions to the hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;911:355–368. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rama P, Martinkauppi S, Linnankoski I, Koivisto J, Aronen HJ, et al. Working memory of identification of emotional vocal expressions: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2001;13:1090–1101. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Luck D, Danion JM, Marrer C, Pham BT, Gounot D, et al. The right parahippocampal gyrus contributes to the formation and maintenance of bound information in working memory. Brain Cogn. 2010;72:255–263. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fiebach CJ, Rissman J, D'Esposito M. Modulation of inferotemporal cortex activation during verbal working memory maintenance. Neuron. 2006;51:251–261. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schuchardt K, Gebhardt M, Maehler C. Working memory functions in children with different degrees of intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54:346–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rojahn J, Lederer M, Tasse MJ. Facial emotion recognition by persons with mental retardation: a review of the experimental literature. Res Dev Disabil. 1995;16:393–414. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(95)00019-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McAlpine C, Singh NN, Kendall KA, Ellis CR. Recognition of facial expressions of emotion by persons with mental retardation. A matched comparison study. Behav Modif. 1992;16:543–558. doi: 10.1177/01454455920164006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rosenquist C, Conners FA, Roskos-Ewoldsen B. Phonological and visuo-spatial working memory in individuals with intellectual disability. Am J Ment Retard. 2003;108:403–413. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2003)108<403:PAVWMI>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schaefer GB, Bodensteiner JB. Developmental anomalies of the brain in mental retardation. International Review of Psychiatry. 1999;11:47–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Berger-Sweeney J, Hohmann CF. Behavioral consequences of abnormal cortical development: insights into developmental disabilities. Behav Brain Res. 1997;86:121–142. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(96)02251-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Branchi I, Bichler Z, Berger-Sweeney J, Ricceri L. Animal models of mental retardation: from gene to cognitive function. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2003;27:141–153. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00016-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Irwin SA, Idupulapati M, Gilbert ME, Harris JB, Chakravarti AB, et al. Dendritic spine and dendritic field characteristics of layer V pyramidal neurons in the visual cortex of fragile-X knockout mice. Am J Med Genet. 2002;111:140–146. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Irwin SA, Galvez R, Greenough WT. Dendritic spine structural anomalies in fragile-X mental retardation syndrome. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:1038–1044. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.10.1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hadjikhani N, Joseph RM, Snyder J, Tager-Flusberg H. Anatomical differences in the mirror neuron system and social cognition network in autism. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16:1276–1282. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yu C, Li J, Liu Y, Qin W, Li Y, et al. White matter tract integrity and intelligence in patients with mental retardation and healthy adults. Neuroimage. 2008;40:1533–1541. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Filippi CG, Lin DD, Tsiouris AJ, Watts R, Packard AM, et al. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging in children with developmental delay: preliminary findings. Radiology. 2003;229:44–50. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2291020049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chechlacz M, Gleeson JG. Is mental retardation a defect of synapse structure and function? Pediatr Neurol. 2003;29:11–17. doi: 10.1016/s0887-8994(03)00152-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nagy Z, Lagercrantz H, Hutton C. Effects of preterm birth on cortical thickness measured in adolescence. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21:300–306. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ramakers GJ. Rho proteins and the cellular mechanisms of mental retardation. Am J Med Genet. 2000;94:367–371. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20001023)94:5<367::aid-ajmg4>3.0.co;2-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage. 1999;9:179–194. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage. 1999;9:195–207. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fischl B, Dale AM. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:11050–11055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.200033797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RB, Dale AM. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8:272–284. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4&#x0003c;272::AID-HBM10&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chung MK, Robbins SM, Dalton KM, Davidson RJ, Alexander AL, et al. Cortical thickness analysis in autism with heat kernel smoothing. Neuroimage. 2005;25:1256–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Worsley KJ, Andermann M, Koulis T, MacDonald D, Evans AC. Detecting changes in nonisotropic images. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8:98–101. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:2/3&#x0003c;98::AID-HBM5&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES