Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Oct 22;67(Pt 11):m1585. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811043121

catena-Poly[[bis­(1-ethyl-1H-imidazole-κN 3)copper(II)]-μ-oxalato-κ4 O 1,O 2:O 1′,O 2′]

Qian Xu a,*
PMCID: PMC3246998  PMID: 22219818

Abstract

The title compound, [Cu(C2O4)(C5H8N2)2]n, is composed of one-dimensional linear chains running parallel to the a axis. In the chain, trans-[Cu(imidazole)2]2+ units are sequentially bridged by bis-bidentate oxalate ligands, resulting in an octa­hedral CuO4N2 donor set. The Cu⋯Cu separation through the oxalate bridge is 5.620 (5) Å. Both the Cu atoms and the C—C bond of the oxalate bridge are bis­ected by inversion centres.

Related literature

For general background on ferroelectric organic compounds with framework structures, see: Fu et al. (2009); Ye et al. (2006); Zhang et al. (2008, 2010).graphic file with name e-67-m1585-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Cu(C2O4)(C5H8N2)2]

  • M r = 343.83

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 5.6200 (11) Å

  • b = 8.8577 (18) Å

  • c = 14.481 (3) Å

  • β = 96.55 (3)°

  • V = 716.2 (2) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.55 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

  • Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) T min = 0.635, T max = 0.734

  • 7300 measured reflections

  • 1653 independent reflections

  • 1267 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.062

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040

  • wR(F 2) = 0.092

  • S = 1.05

  • 1653 reflections

  • 98 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.33 e Å−3

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811043121/bg2425sup1.cif

e-67-m1585-sup1.cif (16.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811043121/bg2425Isup2.hkl

e-67-m1585-Isup2.hkl (81.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Southeast University.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

As part of our ongoing study of potential ferroelectric materials we have determined the structure of the present copper complex and examined its dielectric behaviour with temperature. This is the usual method for detecting these materials (Fu et al., 2009; Ye et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2010). Unfortunately, the dielectric constant for the title compound, Cu[C5H8N]2C2O4, (I) does not show any behavior indicating the onset of a ferroelectric phase change over the range 80 K to 298 K (m.p.319–329).

The Cu atoms are located on crystallographic inversion centers, and are coordinated to four oxygen atoms of two bridging oxalato ligands, also bisected by inversion centres, and two endocyclic nitrogen atoms from two crystallograhically related imidazole molecules, resulting in octahedral MO4N2 donor sets. Fig. 2 suggests the way in which oxalato-bridged chains build up. The Cu — Cu intrachain separation is 5.620 (5) Å.

Experimental

A mixture of 1-ethyl imidazole (1.9 g, 20 mmol), cupric oxalate (1.5 g, 10 mmol) in water was stirred for several days at ambient temperature; blue block crystals were obtained on standing.

Refinement

All H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with C—H = 0.93–0.96 Å, and with Uĩso(H) = 1.2 Uĩso(C) or 1.5 Uĩso(C) for ethy H atoms..

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Ellipsoid plot of (I), ( 50% probability level). Symmetry codes A: -x, 1-y, 1-z. B: 1-x, 1-y, 1-z. C: -1+x, y, z.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Packing diagram of the title compound showing the way in which chains are built up.

Crystal data

[Cu(C2O4)(C5H8N2)2] F(000) = 354
Mr = 343.83 Dx = 1.594 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yn Cell parameters from 1653 reflections
a = 5.6200 (11) Å θ = 2.3–27.5°
b = 8.8577 (18) Å µ = 1.55 mm1
c = 14.481 (3) Å T = 293 K
β = 96.55 (3)° Block, blue
V = 716.2 (2) Å3 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer 1267 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.062
graphite θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.7°
ω scans h = −7→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) k = −11→11
Tmin = 0.635, Tmax = 0.734 l = −18→18
7300 measured reflections 2 standard reflections every 150 reflections
1653 independent reflections intensity decay: none

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.092 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0361P)2 + 0.3394P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1653 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
98 parameters Δρmax = 0.48 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.33 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cu1 0.0000 0.5000 0.5000 0.02341 (16)
C1 0.0677 (5) 0.4366 (4) 0.3025 (2) 0.0326 (7)
H1 0.1452 0.3463 0.3194 0.039*
C2 −0.1151 (5) 0.6469 (4) 0.3090 (2) 0.0365 (7)
H2 −0.1900 0.7304 0.3318 0.044*
C3 −0.0853 (6) 0.6229 (4) 0.2184 (2) 0.0397 (8)
H3 −0.1337 0.6861 0.1685 0.048*
C4 0.1083 (6) 0.4132 (4) 0.1331 (2) 0.0439 (8)
H4A −0.0227 0.4136 0.0833 0.053*
H4B 0.1477 0.3088 0.1482 0.053*
C5 0.3213 (7) 0.4885 (4) 0.0999 (3) 0.0534 (9)
H5A 0.2801 0.5899 0.0809 0.080*
H5B 0.3701 0.4333 0.0482 0.080*
H5C 0.4505 0.4906 0.1494 0.080*
C6 0.4839 (4) 0.4123 (3) 0.49195 (17) 0.0210 (5)
N1 −0.0177 (4) 0.5292 (3) 0.36168 (15) 0.0282 (6)
N2 0.0296 (4) 0.4876 (3) 0.21516 (16) 0.0339 (6)
O1 0.3372 (3) 0.6619 (2) 0.52150 (13) 0.0291 (5)
O2 0.2754 (3) 0.3599 (2) 0.49398 (12) 0.0259 (4)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cu1 0.0188 (2) 0.0301 (3) 0.0218 (2) 0.0016 (2) 0.00409 (16) −0.0002 (2)
C1 0.0357 (16) 0.0345 (16) 0.0279 (16) 0.0039 (14) 0.0056 (13) 0.0016 (13)
C2 0.0367 (16) 0.0403 (18) 0.0333 (16) 0.0065 (14) 0.0067 (13) 0.0027 (14)
C3 0.0414 (17) 0.0478 (19) 0.0291 (16) 0.0012 (16) 0.0010 (13) 0.0095 (15)
C4 0.050 (2) 0.056 (2) 0.0266 (16) −0.0079 (17) 0.0082 (14) −0.0087 (15)
C5 0.063 (2) 0.050 (2) 0.052 (2) −0.0054 (19) 0.0277 (19) 0.0000 (18)
C6 0.0211 (12) 0.0244 (14) 0.0172 (12) 0.0034 (12) 0.0008 (10) 0.0010 (11)
N1 0.0265 (12) 0.0336 (15) 0.0248 (12) 0.0027 (10) 0.0048 (10) 0.0015 (10)
N2 0.0358 (13) 0.0422 (15) 0.0238 (12) −0.0023 (12) 0.0042 (10) −0.0010 (11)
O1 0.0235 (9) 0.0270 (11) 0.0374 (11) 0.0020 (8) 0.0069 (8) −0.0030 (9)
O2 0.0197 (9) 0.0269 (10) 0.0316 (10) −0.0014 (8) 0.0054 (8) −0.0003 (9)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Cu1—O2 1.9935 (18) C3—H3 0.9300
Cu1—O2i 1.9935 (18) C4—N2 1.470 (4)
Cu1—N1 2.011 (2) C4—C5 1.497 (4)
Cu1—N1i 2.011 (2) C4—H4A 0.9700
Cu1—O1i 2.3684 (18) C4—H4B 0.9700
Cu1—O1 2.3684 (19) C5—H5A 0.9600
C1—N1 1.316 (4) C5—H5B 0.9600
C1—N2 1.337 (4) C5—H5C 0.9600
C1—H1 0.9300 C6—O1ii 1.235 (3)
C2—C3 1.359 (4) C6—O2 1.264 (3)
C2—N1 1.368 (4) C6—C6ii 1.579 (5)
C2—H2 0.9300 O1—C6ii 1.235 (3)
C3—N2 1.365 (4)
O2—Cu1—O2i 180.000 (1) N2—C4—C5 112.7 (3)
O2—Cu1—N1 89.27 (8) N2—C4—H4A 109.1
O2i—Cu1—N1 90.73 (8) C5—C4—H4A 109.1
O2—Cu1—N1i 90.73 (8) N2—C4—H4B 109.1
O2i—Cu1—N1i 89.27 (8) C5—C4—H4B 109.1
N1—Cu1—N1i 180.000 (1) H4A—C4—H4B 107.8
O2—Cu1—O1i 103.35 (7) C4—C5—H5A 109.5
O2i—Cu1—O1i 76.65 (7) C4—C5—H5B 109.5
N1—Cu1—O1i 89.94 (8) H5A—C5—H5B 109.5
N1i—Cu1—O1i 90.06 (8) C4—C5—H5C 109.5
O2—Cu1—O1 76.65 (7) H5A—C5—H5C 109.5
O2i—Cu1—O1 103.35 (7) H5B—C5—H5C 109.5
N1—Cu1—O1 90.06 (8) O1ii—C6—O2 125.6 (2)
N1i—Cu1—O1 89.94 (8) O1ii—C6—C6ii 117.7 (3)
O1i—Cu1—O1 180.00 (7) O2—C6—C6ii 116.7 (3)
N1—C1—N2 112.0 (3) C1—N1—C2 105.3 (2)
N1—C1—H1 124.0 C1—N1—Cu1 126.0 (2)
N2—C1—H1 124.0 C2—N1—Cu1 128.6 (2)
C3—C2—N1 109.5 (3) C1—N2—C3 106.8 (2)
C3—C2—H2 125.2 C1—N2—C4 125.6 (3)
N1—C2—H2 125.2 C3—N2—C4 127.5 (3)
C2—C3—N2 106.3 (3) C6ii—O1—Cu1 108.12 (16)
C2—C3—H3 126.8 C6—O2—Cu1 119.93 (16)
N2—C3—H3 126.8

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: BG2425).

References

  1. Fu, D.-W., Ge, J.-Z., Dai, J., Ye, H.-Y. & Qu, Z.-R. (2009). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 12, 994–997.
  2. Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Ye, Q., Song, Y.-M., Wang, G.-X., Chen, K. & Fu, D.-W. (2006). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 6554–6555. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, W., Xiong, R.-G. & Huang, S.-P. D. (2008). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 10468–10469. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, W., Ye, H.-Y., Cai, H.-L., Ge, J.-Z. & Xiong, R.-G. (2010). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 7300–7302. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811043121/bg2425sup1.cif

e-67-m1585-sup1.cif (16.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811043121/bg2425Isup2.hkl

e-67-m1585-Isup2.hkl (81.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES