Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Texas Heart Institute Journal logoLink to The Texas Heart Institute Journal
. 1987 Jun;14(2):170–177.

Early Experience with a New PTFE Graft below the Inguinal Ligament

J Michael Duncan 1, George J Reul 1, Wotjek Aronski 1, Grady L Hallman 1, Denton A Cooley 1
PMCID: PMC324717  PMID: 15229737

Abstract

Between July 1984 and July 1985, 65 expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts (Vitagraft®) were implanted in the infrainguinal position in 51 patients, including 41 men and 10 women, with an average age of 63 years. The indications for surgery were severe claudication (36 grafts) or ischemic necrosis of the extremities (29 grafts). Thirteen of the patients (25%) had had a previously placed infrainguinal graft of another type that had failed, requiring reoperation. Proximal vascular reconstruction (consisting of ten aorto-femoral and two femoro-femoral bypasses) was performed in 12 patients who had 16 grafts. Simultaneous aortocoronary bypass surgery was done in conjunction with a femoral-popliteal bypass in six patients. The site of distal anastomosis was the suprageniculate popliteal artery in 21 grafts (32%), the infrageniculate popliteal artery in 33 grafts (51%), tibio-peroneal trunk in seven grafts (11%), and the posterior tibial artery in four grafts (6%). The mean follow-up was 9.6 months (range, 1 to 16 months). Two grafts (3.0%) failed early (< 30 days). Another three grafts (4.6%) occluded between 1 and 6 months postoperatively, and five occluded after 6 months. The cumulative patency rate at 15 months was 78.8%. Limb salvage was not possible in three patients, who underwent amputation because of multiple previous operations and a lack of distal run-off. There were no operative deaths, graft infections, aneurysms, or untoward reactions (including seromas) along the graft tracts.

At this early follow-up date, we have not encountered the complications normally associated with other grafts; our early results indicate that continued clinical use is warranted. (Texas Heart Institute Journal 1987;14:170-177)

Keywords: Prosthesis, blood vessel

Keywords: polytetrafluoroethylene

Keywords: vascular reconstruction

Keywords: claudication

Keywords: ischemic necrosis

Full text

PDF
170

Images in this article

176Image
on p.176

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergan J. J., Veith F. J., Bernhard V. M., Yao J. S., Flinn W. R., Gupta S. K., Scher L. A., Samson R. H., Towne J. B. Randomization of autogenous vein and polytetrafluorethylene grafts in femoral-distal reconstruction. Surgery. 1982 Dec;92(6):921–930. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brewster D. C., LaSalle A. J., Robison J. G., Strayhorn E. C., Darling R. C. Factors affecting patency of femoropopliteal bypass grafts. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983 Nov;157(5):437–442. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell C. D., Brooks D. H., Webster M. W., Bahnson H. T. The use of expanded microporous polytetrafluoroethylene for limb salvage: a preliminary report. Surgery. 1976 May;79(5):485–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Evans L. E., Webster M. W., Brooks D. H., Bahnson H. T. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene femoropopliteal grafts: forty-eight-month follow-up. Surgery. 1981 Jan;89(1):16–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans L. E., Webster M. W., Brooks D. H., Bahnson H. T. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene femoropopliteal grafts: forty-eight-month follow-up. Surgery. 1981 Jan;89(1):16–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haimov H., Giron F., Jacobson J. H., 2nd The expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft. Three years' experience with 362 grafts. Arch Surg. 1979 Jun;114(6):673–677. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370300027003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hallett J. W., Jr, Brewster D. C., Darling R. C. The limitations of polytetrafluoroethylene in the reconstruction of femoropopliteal and tibial arteries. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Jun;152(6):819–821. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hurwitz R. L., Johnson J. M., Hufnagel C. E. Femoropopliteal bypass using externally supported polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Early results in a multiinstitutional study. Am J Surg. 1985 Nov;150(5):574–576. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90440-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. O'Donnell T. F., Jr, Farber S. P., Richmand D. M., Deterling R. A., Callow A. D. Above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene femoropopliteal bypass graft: Is it a reasonable alternative to the below-knee reversed autogenous vein graft? Surgery. 1983 Jul;94(1):26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosenthal D., Levine K., Stanton P. E., Jr, Lamis P. A. Femoropopliteal bypass: the preferred site for distal anastomosis. Surgery. 1983 Jan;93(1 Pt 1):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sterpetti A. V., Schultz R. D., Feldhaus R. J., Peetz D. J., Jr Seven-year experience with polytetrafluoroethylene as above-knee femoropopliteal bypass graft. Is is worthwhile to preserve the autologous saphenous vein? J Vasc Surg. 1985 Nov;2(6):907–912. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Veith F. J., Gupta S. K., Ascer E., White-Flores S., Samson R. H., Scher L. A., Towne J. B., Bernhard V. M., Bonier P., Flinn W. R. Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg. 1986 Jan;3(1):104–114. doi: 10.1067/mva.1986.avs0030104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Texas Heart Institute Journal are provided here courtesy of Texas Heart Institute

RESOURCES