Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Oct 29;67(Pt 11):o3096. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811043868

Gallic acid pyridine monosolvate

Fu-Yue Dong a, Jie Wu a, Hai-Yan Tian a, Qing-Mei Ye a, Ren-Wang Jiang a,*
PMCID: PMC3247482  PMID: 22220100

Abstract

In the title compound (systenatic name: 3,4,5-trihy­droxy­benzoic acid pyridine monosolvate), C5H5N·C7H6O5, the gallic acid mol­ecule is essentially planar (r.m.s deviation = 0.0766 Å for non-H atoms) and is linked to the pyridine mol­ecule by an O—H⋯N hydrogen bond. An intra­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond occurs in the gallic acid mol­ecule. The gallic acid and pyridine mean planes make a dihedral angle 12.6 (3)°. Inter­molecular O—H⋯O and O—H⋯N hydrogen bonding involving the hy­droxy and carboxyl groups and the pyridine mol­ecule, and π–π inter­actions between inversion-related pyridines [centroid–centroid distance = 3.459 (6) Å] and between pyridine and benzene rings [centroid–centroid distance = 3.548 (6) Å], lead to a three-dimensional network in the crystal.

Related literature

For the biological activity of gallic acid, see: Souza et al. (2011); Ozcelik et al. (2011); Liu et al. (2011). For previous reports on the crystal structures of gallic acid monohydrate and gallic acid monopyridine solvate, see: Clarke et al. (2011); Jiang et al. (2000). For π–π inter­actions in natural flavonoids, see: Jiang et al. (2002, 2009).graphic file with name e-67-o3096-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C5H5N·C7H6O5

  • M r = 249.22

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 9.335 (1) Å

  • b = 10.435 (2) Å

  • c = 11.8581 (15) Å

  • β = 107.632 (8)°

  • V = 1100.9 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.12 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.34 × 0.20 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART CCD 1000 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004) T min = 0.821, T max = 0.986

  • 2601 measured reflections

  • 1944 independent reflections

  • 1031 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.057

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.066

  • wR(F 2) = 0.172

  • S = 1.02

  • 1944 reflections

  • 166 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.36 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.30 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811043868/pk2351sup1.cif

e-67-o3096-sup1.cif (17KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811043868/pk2351Isup2.hkl

e-67-o3096-Isup2.hkl (95.7KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811043868/pk2351Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1A⋯O2i 0.82 2.12 2.869 (3) 152
O1—H1A⋯O2 0.82 2.34 2.736 (4) 110
O2—H2A⋯O5ii 0.82 1.87 2.675 (4) 166
O3—H3A⋯O4iii 0.82 1.91 2.718 (3) 169
O4—H4A⋯N1 0.82 1.92 2.730 (4) 169

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the New Century Excellent Talents Scheme of the Ministry of Education (NCET-08-0612), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (21609202) and the Team Project of the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 8351063201000003). We also thank Mr Guo-Qiang Li for the data collection.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Gallic acid, a dietary polyphenol, is widely distributed in many edible and medicinal plants. It can exist as a single molecule or as a structural unit of hydrolysable tannins. It has been found to show strong pharmacological activities including antioxidant (Souza, et al. 2011), antiviral (Ozcelik, et al., 2011) and antitumor properties (Liu, et al., 2011). This compound contains two of the most common functional groups in natural products, e.g. carboxylic acid and phenolic groups. Crystal engineering studies have revealed interesting polymorphism. Four polymorphs of the monohydrate of gallic acid with three space groups (P 21/c, P 2/n, and P 1), and an anhydrous form with space group C 2/c have been reported (Clarke et al., 2011). We report herein the pyridine monosolvate of gallic acid.

The gallic acid molecule is essentially planar. The mean deviation of the benzene ring is 0.0030 Å, which is similar to that in gallic acid monohydrate (0.0028 Å), and its dihedral angle with the plane of the carboxyl group is 9.8 (3) °, which is larger than that in gallic acid monohydrate (2.9°) (Jiang, et al., 2000). The gallic acid and pyridine molecules make a dihedral angle of 12.8 (4) °. The bond distances are all normal.

Within the asymmetric unit, the gallic acid molecule and pyridine molecule are linked through hydrogen bond O4–H···N1. Intermolecular O—H···O and O—H···N hydrogen-bonding interactions involving the hydroxyl and carboxylic acid groups and the pyridine molecule (Table 1) form a supramolecular assembly. A short intramolecular C—H···O interaction between the C10 methine and a hydroxyl O acceptor is also present [C10–H···O5, 3.169 (18) Å; <C–H···O, 162.0 (5) °]. It is noteworthy that π-π interactions play an important role in the molecular packing. The gallic acid molecules show π-π interactions with the pyridine molecules [centroid-centroid distance 3.548 (6) Å and displacement angle 12.8 (3) °], and inversion-related pyridine molecules are also linked by π-π interactions [centroid-centroid distance = 3.459 (6) Å]. The centroid-centroid distances observed in gallic acid monopyridine solvate are significantly shorter than those in natural flavonoids (Jiang, et al., 2009 and 2002).

Experimental

The title compound was extracted from the whole plant of Polygonum chinense L. The dried plant material (5 kg) was powdered and extracted with 95% ethanol at room temperature to afford the crude extract, which was suspended in distilled water and partitioned with petroleum ether, ethyl acetate and n-butanol. The n-butanol fraction (100g) was subjected to macroporous resin, reverse phase silica gel chromatography to give compound I (21 mg), which was recrystallized in pyridine to afford the monopyridine solvate of gallic acid.

Refinement

The C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically and were included in the refinement in the riding-model approximation, with C—H = 0.96 Å (CH3) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C); 0.97 Å (CH2) and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C); 0.93 Å (aryl H) and Uiso(H)= 1.2Ueq(C); O—H = 0.82 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound showing 30% probability displacement ellipsoids.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The packing diagram viewed approximately down the c-axis.

Crystal data

C5H5N·C7H6O5 F(000) = 520
Mr = 249.22 Dx = 1.504 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yn Cell parameters from 2601 reflections
a = 9.335 (1) Å θ = 2.5–25.0°
b = 10.435 (2) Å µ = 0.12 mm1
c = 11.8581 (15) Å T = 293 K
β = 107.632 (8)° Prism, colorless
V = 1100.9 (3) Å3 0.34 × 0.20 × 0.12 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD 1000 diffractometer 1944 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1031 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.057
ω scan θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004) h = −1→11
Tmin = 0.821, Tmax = 0.986 k = −1→12
2601 measured reflections l = −14→13

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.066 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.172 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0724P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.02 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1944 reflections Δρmax = 0.36 e Å3
166 parameters Δρmin = −0.30 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.026 (5)

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O1 0.2507 (3) 0.4817 (3) 0.5719 (2) 0.0455 (9)
H1A 0.1613 0.4918 0.5650 0.068*
O2 0.0218 (3) 0.5026 (3) 0.3644 (3) 0.0478 (9)
H2A −0.0003 0.5559 0.3111 0.09 (2)*
O3 0.0523 (3) 0.3953 (3) 0.1596 (2) 0.0443 (9)
H3A 0.0722 0.3559 0.1064 0.026 (12)*
O4 0.6443 (3) 0.2100 (3) 0.4836 (2) 0.0447 (9)
H4A 0.7301 0.2041 0.4794 0.067*
O5 0.5775 (3) 0.1955 (3) 0.2878 (2) 0.0372 (8)
C1 0.4139 (4) 0.3050 (4) 0.3759 (3) 0.0272 (10)
C2 0.3957 (4) 0.3632 (4) 0.4761 (3) 0.0335 (10)
H2B 0.4718 0.3581 0.5478 0.040*
C3 0.2654 (4) 0.4285 (4) 0.4696 (3) 0.0319 (10)
C4 0.1511 (4) 0.4397 (4) 0.3634 (3) 0.0293 (10)
C5 0.1690 (4) 0.3824 (4) 0.2629 (3) 0.0299 (10)
C6 0.2988 (4) 0.3151 (4) 0.2682 (3) 0.0308 (10)
H6A 0.3096 0.2768 0.2004 0.037*
C7 0.5536 (4) 0.2314 (4) 0.3809 (3) 0.0298 (10)
N1 0.9126 (4) 0.1750 (4) 0.4402 (4) 0.0467 (10)
C8 1.1809 (5) 0.0925 (5) 0.4259 (5) 0.0508 (13)
H8A 1.2731 0.0630 0.4216 0.061*
C9 1.1691 (5) 0.1366 (5) 0.5296 (5) 0.0544 (14)
H9A 1.2532 0.1387 0.5962 0.065*
C10 1.0337 (6) 0.1779 (5) 0.5367 (4) 0.0516 (14)
H10A 1.0251 0.2082 0.6082 0.062*
C11 0.9235 (6) 0.1326 (5) 0.3370 (4) 0.0529 (14)
H11A 0.8389 0.1312 0.2708 0.063*
C12 1.0599 (6) 0.0908 (5) 0.3285 (4) 0.0542 (14)
H12A 1.0685 0.0619 0.2567 0.065*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O1 0.0410 (17) 0.066 (2) 0.0299 (16) 0.0120 (17) 0.0106 (13) −0.0052 (16)
O2 0.0428 (18) 0.065 (2) 0.0382 (17) 0.0205 (18) 0.0164 (14) 0.0152 (18)
O3 0.0319 (16) 0.067 (2) 0.0288 (16) 0.0128 (16) 0.0009 (13) −0.0029 (17)
O4 0.0269 (15) 0.071 (2) 0.0322 (16) 0.0146 (17) 0.0036 (13) 0.0038 (16)
O5 0.0367 (16) 0.051 (2) 0.0277 (15) 0.0034 (15) 0.0150 (12) −0.0043 (15)
C1 0.024 (2) 0.032 (2) 0.026 (2) −0.0016 (19) 0.0081 (17) 0.0049 (18)
C2 0.027 (2) 0.044 (3) 0.024 (2) −0.001 (2) −0.0009 (17) −0.002 (2)
C3 0.036 (2) 0.036 (3) 0.026 (2) −0.001 (2) 0.0132 (19) −0.0036 (19)
C4 0.027 (2) 0.035 (3) 0.026 (2) 0.009 (2) 0.0088 (17) 0.0079 (19)
C5 0.022 (2) 0.038 (3) 0.026 (2) −0.003 (2) 0.0023 (17) 0.0054 (19)
C6 0.026 (2) 0.043 (3) 0.0227 (19) −0.005 (2) 0.0056 (16) 0.0005 (19)
C7 0.0213 (19) 0.039 (3) 0.026 (2) −0.005 (2) 0.0024 (17) 0.003 (2)
N1 0.036 (2) 0.043 (3) 0.065 (3) 0.0048 (19) 0.021 (2) 0.005 (2)
C8 0.042 (3) 0.039 (3) 0.078 (4) 0.006 (2) 0.028 (3) 0.013 (3)
C9 0.037 (3) 0.054 (3) 0.060 (3) −0.008 (3) −0.003 (2) 0.011 (3)
C10 0.067 (3) 0.048 (3) 0.047 (3) −0.012 (3) 0.028 (3) −0.009 (3)
C11 0.054 (3) 0.048 (3) 0.043 (3) −0.003 (3) −0.006 (2) 0.012 (3)
C12 0.077 (4) 0.049 (3) 0.049 (3) 0.004 (3) 0.038 (3) 0.002 (3)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

O1—C3 1.379 (5) C4—C5 1.388 (5)
O1—H1A 0.8200 C5—C6 1.385 (5)
O2—C4 1.377 (5) C6—H6A 0.9300
O2—H2A 0.8200 N1—C11 1.333 (6)
O3—C5 1.378 (4) N1—C10 1.343 (6)
O3—H3A 0.8200 C8—C9 1.348 (7)
O4—C7 1.275 (4) C8—C12 1.349 (7)
O4—H4A 0.8200 C8—H8A 0.9300
O5—C7 1.248 (4) C9—C10 1.362 (7)
C1—C2 1.391 (5) C9—H9A 0.9300
C1—C6 1.402 (5) C10—H10A 0.9300
C1—C7 1.499 (5) C11—C12 1.379 (7)
C2—C3 1.375 (5) C11—H11A 0.9300
C2—H2B 0.9300 C12—H12A 0.9300
C3—C4 1.387 (5)
C3—O1—H1A 109.5 C1—C6—H6A 120.1
C4—O2—H2A 109.5 O5—C7—O4 123.2 (4)
C5—O3—H3A 109.5 O5—C7—C1 120.3 (3)
C7—O4—H4A 109.5 O4—C7—C1 116.5 (3)
C2—C1—C6 119.2 (4) C11—N1—C10 120.8 (4)
C2—C1—C7 121.3 (3) C9—C8—C12 120.4 (5)
C6—C1—C7 119.5 (3) C9—C8—H8A 119.8
C3—C2—C1 120.2 (3) C12—C8—H8A 119.8
C3—C2—H2B 119.9 C8—C9—C10 119.9 (5)
C1—C2—H2B 119.9 C8—C9—H9A 120.1
C2—C3—O1 118.2 (3) C10—C9—H9A 120.1
C2—C3—C4 121.1 (4) N1—C10—C9 119.8 (4)
O1—C3—C4 120.7 (4) N1—C10—H10A 120.1
O2—C4—C3 117.9 (4) C9—C10—H10A 120.1
O2—C4—C5 123.1 (3) N1—C11—C12 120.0 (5)
C3—C4—C5 118.9 (4) N1—C11—H11A 120.0
O3—C5—C6 122.3 (4) C12—C11—H11A 120.0
O3—C5—C4 116.9 (4) C8—C12—C11 119.1 (5)
C6—C5—C4 120.7 (3) C8—C12—H12A 120.5
C5—C6—C1 119.8 (4) C11—C12—H12A 120.5
C5—C6—H6A 120.1
C6—C1—C2—C3 0.9 (6) C4—C5—C6—C1 −0.2 (6)
C7—C1—C2—C3 −179.0 (4) C2—C1—C6—C5 −0.2 (6)
C1—C2—C3—O1 178.3 (4) C7—C1—C6—C5 179.7 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −1.2 (6) C2—C1—C7—O5 −169.7 (4)
C2—C3—C4—O2 177.8 (4) C6—C1—C7—O5 10.4 (6)
O1—C3—C4—O2 −1.6 (6) C2—C1—C7—O4 9.5 (6)
C2—C3—C4—C5 0.8 (6) C6—C1—C7—O4 −170.3 (4)
O1—C3—C4—C5 −178.7 (4) C12—C8—C9—C10 1.0 (8)
O2—C4—C5—O3 2.7 (6) C11—N1—C10—C9 −0.4 (7)
C3—C4—C5—O3 179.6 (4) C8—C9—C10—N1 −0.2 (8)
O2—C4—C5—C6 −177.0 (4) C10—N1—C11—C12 0.2 (7)
C3—C4—C5—C6 −0.1 (7) C9—C8—C12—C11 −1.2 (8)
O3—C5—C6—C1 −179.9 (4) N1—C11—C12—C8 0.6 (7)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1A···O2i 0.82 2.12 2.869 (3) 152.
O1—H1A···O2 0.82 2.34 2.736 (4) 110.
O2—H2A···O5ii 0.82 1.87 2.675 (4) 166.
O3—H3A···O4iii 0.82 1.91 2.718 (3) 169.
O4—H4A···N1 0.82 1.92 2.730 (4) 169.

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: PK2351).

References

  1. Bruker (1998). SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Clarke, H. D., Arora, K. K., Wojtas, L. & Zaworotko, M. J. (2011). Cryst. Growth Des. 11, 964–966.
  3. Jiang, R.-W., Ming, D.-S., But, P. P. H. & Mak, T. C. W. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 594–595. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Jiang, R. W., Wang, Y., Gao, H., Zhang, D. M. & Ye, W. C. (2009). J. Mol. Struct. 920, 383–386.
  5. Jiang, R. W., Ye, W. C., Woo, K. Y., Du, J., Che, C. T., But, P. P. H. & Mak, T. C. W. (2002). J. Mol. Struct. 642, 77–84.
  6. Liu, K. C., Huang, A. C., Wu, P. P., Lin, H. Y., Chueh, F. S., Yang, J. S., Lu, C. C., Chiang, J. H., Meng, M. & Chung, J. G. (2011). Oncol. Rep. 26, 177–184. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Ozcelik, B., Kartal, M. & Orhan, I. (2011). Pharm. Biol. 49, 396–402. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (2004). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  9. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Souza, B. W. S., Cerqueira, M. A., Martins, J. T., Quintas, M. A. C., Ferreira, A. C. S., Teixeira, J. A. & Vicente, A. A. (2011). J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 5589–5594. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811043868/pk2351sup1.cif

e-67-o3096-sup1.cif (17KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811043868/pk2351Isup2.hkl

e-67-o3096-Isup2.hkl (95.7KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811043868/pk2351Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES