Skip to main content
The Texas Heart Institute Journal logoLink to The Texas Heart Institute Journal
. 1989;16(3):163–168.

Use of Laser to Extract Unwanted Pacemaker Leads

Gopal Rao 1, Patrick Flaherty 1
PMCID: PMC324876  PMID: 15227201

Abstract

Of the total number of pacemakers implanted each year, 6% must eventually be replaced because of infection, lead failure, or other problems. Often however, removal of the pacing leads is precluded by scarring at the tip of the leads. Because abandoned leads can cause serious problems, we initiated the present study to test the feasibility of using a laser to remove such leads. After performing in vitro experiments to establish the laser settings required for severing leads, we implanted 6 leads, from 4 different manufacturers, in 3 dogs. Five weeks later, we passed a laser fiber through each lead to the tip and delivered a 10-watt impulse for 2 seconds, which resulted in the successful removal of all the leads. When the dogs were killed 3 days later, postmortem examination revealed no thromboembolism in the heart or lungs and no myocardial damage. Subsequent experiments in 3 human cadaver hearts—involving leads implanted for 5 years, 2 years, and 2 months—yielded the same satisfactory results as did the canine experiments. (Texas Heart Institute Journal 1989;16:163-8)

Keywords: Pacemaker leads, extraction of

Keywords: lasers

Full text

PDF
163

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Byrd C. L., Schwartz S. J., Sivina M., Yahr W. Z., Greenberg J. J. Technique for the surgical extraction of permanent pacing leads and electrodes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Jan;89(1):142–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chamorro H., Rao G., Wholey M. H. Superior vena cava syndrome: a complication of transvenous pacemaker implantation. Radiology. 1978 Feb;126(2):377–378. doi: 10.1148/126.2.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chavez C. M., Conn J. H. Septicemia secondary to impacted infected pacemaker wire. Successful treatment by removal with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977 May;73(5):796–800. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Furman S., Behrens M., Andrews C., Klementowicz P. Retained pacemaker leads. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987 Nov;94(5):770–772. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Madigan N. P., Curtis J. J., Sanfelippo J. F., Murphy T. J. Difficulty of extraction of chronically implanted tined ventricular endocardial leads. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Mar;3(3):724–731. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80248-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rettig G., Doenecke P., Sen S., Volkmer I., Bette L. Complications with retained transvenous pacemaker electrodes. Am Heart J. 1979 Nov;98(5):587–594. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(79)90284-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Saab S. B., Jung J. Y., Almond C. H. Retention of pacemaker electrode complicated by Serratia marcescens septicemia. Removal with total cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977 Mar;73(3):404–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wallace H. W., Sherafat M., Blakemore W. S. The subborn pacemaker catheter. Surgery. 1970 Nov;68(5):914–915. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Texas Heart Institute Journal are provided here courtesy of Texas Heart Institute

RESOURCES