Skip to main content
The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases logoLink to The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
. 1999 Mar-Apr;10(2):128–133. doi: 10.1155/1999/278586

A cross-Canada surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in respiratory tract pathogens

Ross J Davidson 1; Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network1,*, Donald E Low 1,
PMCID: PMC3250720  PMID: 22346378

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis from medical centres across Canada.

METHODS:

Fifty laboratories from across Canada were asked to collect up to 25 consecutive clinical isolates of S pneumoniae, H influenzae and M catarrhalis at some time between September 1994 and May 1995, and then again between September and December of 1996. A total of 2364 S pneumoniae, 575 H influenzae and 200 M catarrhalis samples were collected. H influenzae and M catarrhalis isolates were tested for the production of beta-lactamase. S pneumoniae isolates were characterized as penicillin susceptible, intermediately resistant or high level penicillin-resistant. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using a microbroth dilution technique described by the National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standards.

RESULTS:

Between the two collection periods, there was a significant increase in highly penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae from 2.1% to 4.4% (P<0.05) and an increase in intermediately penicillin-resistant strains from 6.4% to 8.9% (P<0.05). A significant increase in high level penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae was noted among paediatric isolates. No significant difference in the susceptibilities of comparator agents was detected. A significant increase in the number of beta-lactamase producing H influenzae, 34% to 43% (P<0.05) was observed. Ninety-five per cent of M catarrhalis isolates were beta-lactamase producers in both time periods.

CONCLUSIONS:

During the course of this study, the incidence of penicillin resistance in S pneumoniae doubled. As a result of this increase, infections due to this organism in sites where poor penetration of beta-lactam antibiotics occur may become increasingly difficult to manage.

Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance, Respiratory tract pathogens


Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis are the most common bacterial pathogens associated with upper respiratory tract infections in both children and adults (1,2). These pathogens are frequently the causative agents in community-acquired pneumonia, acute sinusitis, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, otitis media and meningitis. Worldwide increases in antimicrobial resistance and the changing epidemiology of pathogenic strains have required a change in the approach to treatment of infections due to these organisms.

Because rapid, sensitive and specific diagnostic tests are not available for the common respiratory bacterial pathogens, choice of antimicrobial therapy is nearly always empirical. Thus, it is essential to monitor rates of resistance to such pathogens so that the most efficacious agent can be used.

The present study was performed to determine the rates of antimicrobial resistance to three respiratory tract pathogens from across Canada. Centres that had previously provided isolates to determine resistance rates in various pathogens were asked to participate in the present study. Specifically, the rates of penicillin susceptibility in S pneumoniae and beta-lactamase production in H influenzae and M catarrhalis were determined. As well, the in vitro activities of selected antimicrobial agents were determined against all three pathogens.

METHODS

Fifty laboratories from across Canada were asked to collect up to 25 consecutive clinical isolates of S pneumoniae, H influenzae and M catarrhalis at some time between September 1994 and May 1995, and then again between September and December of 1996. A total of 2364 S pneumoniae, 575 H influenzae and 200 M catarrhalis samples were collected. Almost all centres were tertiary care centres that served urban areas. All isolates were sent to Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto, Ontario) microbiology laboratory for analysis. All isolates were nonsterile respiratory tract specimens that were predominately sputum cultures (greater than 90%). Only single isolates from different patients were included in the study. Study sites were asked to provide information on the patient’s age and site of isolation. Isolates were identified using standard criteria (3). H influenzae were serotyped to determine whether they were type b using a commercial latex agglutination serotyping kit (Difco Laboratories, Michigan).

H influenzae and M catarrhalis isolates were tested for the production of beta-lactamase by the cefinase disk method (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Maryland) (4). Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using a microbroth dilution technique described by the National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (Villanova, Pennsylvania) (5). The susceptible, intermediate and resistant breakpoints for determining penicillin susceptibility of S pneumoniae were: susceptible 0.06 mg/L or less, intermediate 0.12 to 1 mg/L and resistant 2.0 mg/L or greater. The following antimicrobials were evaluated: cefprozil (Cefzil, Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Inc), cefaclor (Ceclor, Eli Lilly Canada Inc), cefixime (Suprax, Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Canada Inc), cephalexin (Keflex, Eli Lilly Canada Inc), cefuroxime (Zinacef, Glaxo Wellcome Canada Inc), ampicillin, clarithromycin (Biaxin, Abbott), azithromycin (Zithromax, Pfizer Canada), erythromycin and ciprofloxacin (Cipro, Bayer Inc). Erythromycin, ampicillin, clindamycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company (Michigan).

RESULTS

Of 3139 clinical isolates, S pneumoniae accounted for 75% (2364) of the isolates, 18.5% (575) were H influenzae, and the remaining 6.5% (or should be 6%) (200) were M catarrhalis. More than 90% of specimens were isolated from sputum samples.

Overall, approximately 40% of the S pneumoniae isolates were from a paediatric (age birth to 16 years) population, and 60% originated from adults during both time periods. In 1994–95, 91.4% of S pneumoniae strains were penicillin susceptible, 6.4% were intermediately resistant and 2.1% were highly resistant to penicillin (Table 1). In 1996, there was an overall significant increase in intermediately resistant strains (8.9%) and highly resistant strains (4.4%) (P<0.05). Most provinces had an increase in the number of intermediately and highly resistant S pneumoniae isolates (Table 1). No significant increases in intermediately or highly resistant S pneumoniae were observed in the adult population between 1994–95 and 1996, including those older than 65 years of age (P>0.05). Significant increases were seen, however, in the paediatric population for both intermediately and highly resistant S pneumoniae. The prevalence of penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae in children increased from 1.8% in 1994–95 to 6.2% in 1996 (P<0.05).

TABLE 1.

Penicillin susceptibility of 1320 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae collected from across Canada between September 1994 and May 1995, and of 1044 strains in 1996

Province Penicillin susceptibility category* (%)
Intermediate Resistant
1994/95 1996 1994/95 1996
Alberta/British Columbia 8 (5.9) 18 (16) 1 (0.7) 4 (3.5)
North West Territories 8 (9.6) 6 (10.5) 3 (3.6) 2 (3.5)
Saskatchewan 25 (18) 12 (14) 3 (2.2) 6 (7.1)
Manitoba 4 (5.3) 12 (7.1) 1 (1.3) 9 (5.4)
Ontario 30 (4.6) 39 (8.4) 15 (2.3) 21 (4.5)
Quebec 5 (6.5) 2 (2.1) 4 (5.2) 3 (3.2)
Maritime* 5 (3.2) 4 (6.3) 1 (0.6) 1 (1.6)
Total 85 (6.4) 93 (8.9) 28 (2.1) 46 (4.4)
*

Maritime includes Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick. Intermediate Penicillin-intermediate minimum inhibitory concentration 0.1 to 1.0 mg/L; Resistant Resistant minimum inhibitory concentration 2.0 mg/L or greater

All agents tested had excellent activity against penicillin-susceptible strains. Among intermediately resistant strains, high rates of resistance were observed for erythromycin (12.9%), TMP/SMX (65.6%), cefuroxime (42.4%) and tetracycline (11.2%) (Table 2). The incidence of clindamycin and chloramphenicol resistance was 7.3% and 3.9%, respectively. Rates of resistance for the cephalosporins were only calculated for cefuroxime and ceftriaxone because these are the only agents tested for which the NCCLS has established breakpoints for S pneumoniae. The same trend was seen in highly resistant strains. Significant increases in resistance were observed for cefuroxime (56%), erythromycin (18.7%), TMP/SMX (86.7%), ceftriaxone (12%) and chloramphenicol (20%).

TABLE 2.

In vitro activity of selected antimicrobial agents against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis

Antimicrobial Total n=2364 MIC90s (mg/L) (percentage resistant)*
S pneumoniae H influenzae M catarrhalis
Intermediate n=178 Resistant n=74 β-lac – n=361 β-lac + n=214 β-lac – n=10 β-lac + n=190
Ampicillin 0.25 2 4 2 (0.7) 16 (96) 0.12 (0) 16 (88.4)
Cefprozil 2.0 8 >16 8 (0) 8 (2.6) 0.5 (0) 4 (0)
Cefaclor 2 >16 >16 8 (0) 16 (11.8) 0.25 (0) 2 (0)
Cefixime 2.0 16 >16 0.25 (0) 0.25 (0) 0.25 (0) 0.5 (0)
Cephalexin 4 >16 >16 16 16 4 8
Cefuroxime 2.0 (12.3) 4 (42.4) 8 (100) 1 (0) 1 (0) ND ND
Ceftriaxone 0.25 (0.5) 0.5 (0.6) 2 (12) ND ND ND ND
Ciprofloxacin 1 2 2 0.06 (0) 0.06 (0) 0.06 (0) 0.06 (0)
Erythromycin 0.25 (4.3) 8 (12.9) 4 (18.7) 8 8 0.25 (0) 0.25 (0)
Clindamycin 0.25 (0.7) 0.25 (7.3) 0.5 (8) ND ND ND ND
TMP/SMX 4 (9.5) 8 (65.6) 8 (86.7) 0.25 (2.9) 4 (13.7) 0.25 (0) 0.5 (0)
Tetracycline 2 (2.2) 2 (11.2) 16 (18.7) 2 (0) 2 (1.3) ND ND
Chloramphenicol 4 (1.0) 4 (3.9) 16 (14.7) 2 (0) 2 (0) ND ND
*

When interpretive criteria available;

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) represented as trimethoprim. b-lac + Beta-lactamase positive; b-lac – Beta-lactamase negative; Intermediate Penicillin intermediate MIC 0.1 to 1.0 mg/L; ND Not done; Resistant Resistant MIC 2.0 mg/L or greater

Beta-lactamase was detected in 34% of H influenzae strains in 1994–95 and 43% in 1996. Of the 575 isolates that were collected, only three strains were serotype b. Two of these were isolated from adults and one from a child. Forty-four per cent of the H influenzae isolates were from a paediatric population, the remaining 56% were from adults.

For beta-lactamase negative H influenzae, all agents had good activity. Ninety-six per cent of beta-lactamase producing H influenzae were resistant to ampicillin, and 13.7% were resistant to TMP/SMX (Table 2). Among the oral cephalosporins, 11.8% displayed resistance to cefaclor, while only 2.6% were resistant to cefprozil. Low levels of tetracycline resistance (1.3%) were observed. No resistance was detected for cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin or chloramphenicol.

Beta-lactamase production was detected in 95% of the M catarrhalis isolates (Table 2). Seventy per cent of these isolates were from adults. The nonbeta-lactamase producing M catarrhalis isolates were sensitive to all agents tested. Predictably, the beta-lactamase producing M catarrhalis strains were resistant to ampicillin (88.4%). All other antimicrobials retained good activity against beta-lactamase-positive strains.

DISCUSSION

The management of patients with infections of the respiratory tract due to H influenzae, S pneumoniae, and M catarrhalis has been complicated by the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (6).

S pneumoniae remains the most common pathogen in acute community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, otitis media and sinusitis, and the second most common pathogen in bacterial meningitis (1,2). S pneumoniae, until 1967, had remained universally susceptible to penicillin, even though it was introduced into clinical practice in the 1940s. MICs were uniformly less than 0.01 mg/L. The first penicillin-resistant pneumococcal isolate was reported in 1967 in Australia (7). Resistance to penicillin was subsequently reported in South Africa and has now been encountered worldwide (8).

S pneumoniae with MICs to penicillin 0.1 mg/L or greater are considered nonsusceptible or resistant to penicillin. Resistance is further described as either intermediately or highly resistant. Intermediately resistant S pneumoniae have MICs to penicillin ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 mg/L. Highly resistant S pneumoniae have MICs greater than 1.0 mg/L. Before 1990, the prevalence of intermediately resistant S pneumoniae in Canada was reported to be approximately 1.5% (9,10). Highly resistant strains had not been reported. Significant increases in resistance to penicillin were first noted in 1993 (11). In a cross-Canada surveillance study performed during 1994 and 1995, 8.4% of isolates were intermediately resistant and 3.3% highly resistant to penicillin, results similar to our findings (12). Doern et al (13) reported that 14.1% and 9.5% of S pneumoniae isolates in the United States were intermediately and highly resistant to penicillin during the same time period. A more recent investigation reported that up to 36% of S pneumoniae isolates in the United States were resistant to penicillin (14). Our findings of the increasing prevalence of both intermediately and highly penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae reflects what is occurring in other parts of the world.

Beta-lactams bind to the penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) of the organism, thereby inhibiting their function, which is the ongoing construction of new cell wall. Penicillin resistance is the result of the remodelling of the PBPs so that they have a decreased affinity for penicillin. This has occurred as the result of a combination of both chromosomal mutations and by exchange of a region encoding part of the penicillin-sensitive domain with a homologous region from a closely related species that produce forms of PBPs that are less susceptible to inhibition by the antibiotic (15,16). As remodelling occurs, the MIC increases in modest increments from sensitive to intermediate to resistant. The amount of remodelling and, therefore, the increase in level of penicillin resistance are limited because the function of the PBPs must be maintained in order for the organism to survive. By increasing the dose of the beta-lactam, effective therapy can be achieved for infections, such as bacteremia and pneumonia, where it is still possible to increase serum and tissue concentrations four- to eightfold dilutions above the MIC (17,18). However, at sites of infections where there is poor penetration of the beta-lactam, treatment failures can occur. The use of an oral beta-lactam antibiotic for the treatment of otitis media may not achieve the levels required to eradicate an infection by penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae (19). Even the use of high-dose parental penicillin for the treatment of meningitis may fail to achieve adequate concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid (18).

Surveillance studies have shown that S pneumoniae strains that harbour penicillin resistance also tend to be resistant to other unrelated classes of antimicrobials. One study demonstrated that approximately 60% of penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae strains were resistant to at least one other drug (2). This increase in resistance is especially important for commonly used antimicrobials, such as TMP/SMX, the macrolides and the tetracyclines.

TMP/SMX is used extensively for the treatment of urinary tract, enteric and respiratory infections in developing countries. Trimethoprim selectively inhibits bacterial dihydrofolate reductase, thus preventing the reduction of dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate. Trimethoprim and TMP/SMX resistance has been strongly associated with penicillin resistance in S pneumoniae. Sixty-six per cent of intermediately resistant strains and 87% of highly resistant strains were resistant to TMP/SMX in the present study (Table 2). Resistance to TMP/SMX is defined as a MIC pf 8 mg/L or greater. The mechanism of trimethoprim resistance is due to mutations to the dihydrofolate reductase genes (20). However, unlike penicillin resistance in S pneumoniae, the mutation results in a several fold increase in the MIC to a trimethoprim level that is unachievable in serum and tissue.

The macrolides are the most often prescribed first-line therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (21). Macrolides (erythromycin and clarithromycin) and the azide, azithromycin, inhibit protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunits and inhibit elongation of peptide chains. Macrolide resistance in S pneumoniae is due primarily to the acquisition of a gene which is responsible for either efflux of the macrolide out of the cell or a gene which is responsible for modifying the ribosome so as to prevent antibiotic binding. Resistance is defined as a MIC of 0.5 mg/L or greater. The mean MICs for those strains resistant due to efflux is 10 mg/L and for those strains resistant due to ribosomal modification is 64 mg/L (22). Peak levels in serum of 2 to 3, 0.5 to 1, and 0.4 mg/L are reached at 3 h after oral doses of erythromycin (500 mg), clarithromycin (250 mg) and azithromycin (500 mg), respectively (23). Therefore, as with trimethoprim, the result of the development of resistance is a several fold increase in the MIC, well above achievable concentrations in the serum. As opposed to trimethoprim and TMP/SMX, this may, however, be offset by very high tissue concentrations of macrolides that are 10- to 100-fold higher than those in serum (24).

Before the introduction of the H influenzae serotype b (Hib) vaccine, Hib was a common and often fatal cause of infection (25,26). Dramatic declines in Hib-related disease in both children and adults have been observed since the introduction and widespread use of the vaccine. Scheifele et al (27) reported a decrease of more than 95% of Hib infections in children between 1985 and 1995. Our study found only three Hib strains in 575 isolates of H influenzae. Although nontypable H influenzae strains remain an important cause of mucosal disease in the respiratory tract in both children and adults, invasive disease is rare (2629).

Before 1972, H influenzae was almost uniformly susceptible to ampicillin (30). During the 1970s, penicillin-resistant strains emerged due to the production of plasmid-mediated TEM-1 and ROB-1 beta-lactamases (31). PBPs with decreased affinity for beta-lactams have also been shown to confer resistance to penicillins and cephalosporins, although this occurred in less than 2% of H influenzae isolates tested in this study (data not shown). In 1994, a cross-Canada surveillance study of H influenzae strains demonstrated that 37% of strains were beta-lactamase producers (32). The present study demonstrates that beta-lactamase resistance continues to increase significantly in H influenzae. In addition, there has been a disturbing increase in resistance rates to cefaclor, an antimicrobial that previously had been found to be relatively stable to the beta-lactamases of H influenzae (32).

M catarrhalis is recognized as a pathogen in otitis media, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and sinusitis (33). Almost uniformly susceptible to beta-lactams before the 1980s, resistance due to beta-lactamase production is now in excess of 90% of isolates in most countries (2,33). Penicillin resistance in M catarrhalis is due to the production of two beta-lactamases, BRO-1 and BRO-2 (34,35). BRO-1 can be found in approximately 90% of isolates, and BRO-2 in the remaining 10%. Fortunately, M catarrhalis is a rare cause of invasive disease and plays a questionable role in mucosal disease (33).

Our findings of the increasing prevalence of penicillin resistance in S pneumoniae and beta-lactamase positivity in H influenzae are not surprising because doctors have not reduced the widespread use of oral antibiotics in the community, especially in children. To control resistance effectively in respiratory tract pathogens, regulating out-patient antimicrobial use is crucial (36,37). There are examples that, in some countries where resistance has emerged, efforts to control or reduce resistance have been successful. The emergence of macrolide resistance has been linked to widespread use of this antimicrobial class in Japan and Finland, and was controlled by policies that restricted macrolide use (38,39).

Canada’s Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Ottawa, Ontario and provincial governments have initiated multidisciplinary partnerships to reduce antimicrobial use. Our hopes of controlling antimicrobial resistance in Canada depend on both the success of these initiatives and the efforts of individual physicians.

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported in part by a grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Inc and the Canadian Bacterial Diseases Network.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Breiman RF, Butler JC, Tenover FC. Emergence of drug resistant pneumococcal infections in the United States. JAMA. 1994;271:1831–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jorgensen JH, Doern GV, Maher LA, Howell AW, Redding JS. Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:2075–80. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.11.2075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH, editors. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 6th edn. Washington: American Society for Microbiology Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jones RN, Edson DC. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing trends and accuracy in the United States. A review of the College of American Pathologists Microbiology Surveys, 1972–1989. Microbiology Resource Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991;115:429–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards . Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically [M7-A3] Villanova: NCCLS; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Esposito AL. Role of oral antimicrobial drugs in the treatment of respiratory tract infections: overview and summary of newer agents. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 1995;4(Suppl 4):S250–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hansman D, Bullen MM. A resistant pneumococcus. Lancet. 1967;ii:264–5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)91547-0. (Lett) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Appelbaum PC. World-wide development of antibiotic resistance in pneumococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987;6:367–77. doi: 10.1007/BF02013089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jette LP, Lamothe F. Surveillance of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae infection in Quebec, Canada from 1984 to 1986: serotype distribution, antimicrobial susceptibility and clinical characteristics. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:1–5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.1.1-5.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mazzulli T, Simor AE, Jaeger R, Fuller S, Low DE. Comparative in vitro activities of several new fluoroquinolones and beta-lactam antimicrobials against community isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:467–9. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.3.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Simor AE, Louie L, Goodfellow J, Louie M. Emergence of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae – southern Ontario, Canada, 1993–1994. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995;44:207–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Simor AE, Louie M, The Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network. Low DE. Canadian national survey of the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2190–3. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.9.2190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Doern GV, Brueggeman A, Preston Holley H, Rauch AM. Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients in the United States during the winter months of 1994 to 1995: Results of a 30 center national surveillance study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1208–13. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.5.1208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ballow CH, Jones RN, Johnson D, Deinhart JA, Schentag JJ, the SPAR study group Regional trends in S pneumoniae resistance: results of a nationwide, multi-center trial. Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; Toronto. September 28 to October 1, 1997; (Abst E-118) [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dowson CG, Coffey TJ, Spratt BG. Origin and molecular epidemiology of penicillin binding protein mediated resistance to beta lactam antibiotics. Trends Microbiol. 1994;2:361–6. doi: 10.1016/0966-842x(94)90612-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Coffey TJ, Dowson CG, Daniels M, Spratt BG. Genetics and molecular biology of beta lactam resistant pneumococci. Microb Drug Resist. 1995;1:29–34. doi: 10.1089/mdr.1995.1.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pallares R, Linares J, Vadillo M, et al. Resistance to penicillin and cephalosporin and mortality from severe pneumococcal pneumonia in Barcelona, Spain. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:474–80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508243330802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schreiber JR, Jacobs MR. Antibiotic resistant pneumococci. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1995;42:519–34. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)38977-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dagan R, Abramson O, Leibovitz E, et al. Impaired bacteriologic response to oral cephalosporins in acute otitis media caused by pneumococci with intermediate resistance to penicillin. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15:980–5. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199611000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Adrian PV, Klugman KP. Mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase gene of trimethoprim-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2406–13. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.11.2406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gleason PP, Kapoor WN, Stone RA, et al. Medical outcomes and antimicrobial costs with the use of the American Thoracic Society guidelines for outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia. JAMA. 1997;278:32–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Johnston NJ, de Azavedo JC, Kellner JD, Low DE. Prevalence and characterization of the mechanisms of macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:2425–6. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.9.2425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yao JDC, Moellering RC. Antibacterial agents. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH, editors. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 6th edn. Washington: American Society for Microbiology Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Williams JD, Sefton AM. Comparison of macrolide antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chem. 1993;31(Suppl C):11–25. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Barbour ML, Mayon-White RT, Coles C, Crook DWM, Moxon ER. The impact of conjugate vaccine on carriage of Haemophilus influenzae type b. J Infect Dis. 1995;171:93–8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/171.1.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Muhlemann K, Balz M, Aebi S, Schopfer K. Molecular characteristics of Haemophilus influenzae causing invasive disease during the period of vaccination in Switzerland: Analysis of strains isolated between 1986 and 1993. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:560–3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.3.560-563.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Scheifele DW, Jadavji TP, Law BJ, et al. Recent trends in pediatric Haemophilus influenzae type b infections in Canada. Can Med Assoc J. 1996;154:1041–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Urwin G, Krohn JA, Deaver-Robinson K, Wenger JD, Farley MM, the Haemophilus influenzae study group Invasive disease due to Haemophilus influenzae serotype f: Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics in the H influenzae serotype b vaccine era. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:1069–76. doi: 10.1093/clinids/22.6.1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Doern GV, Jorgansen JH, Thornsberry C, et al. National collaborative study of the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1988;32:180–5. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.2.180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khan W, Ross S, Rodriguez W. Haemophilus influenzae type B resistant to ampicillin: a report of two cases. JAMA. 1974;229:298–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sykes RB, Matthew M, O’Callaghan CH. R-factor mediated beta-lactamase production by Haemophilus influenzae. J Med Microbial. 1975;8:437–41. doi: 10.1099/00222615-8-3-437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Scriver SR, Walmsley SL, Kau CL, et al. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibilities of Canadian isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and characterization of their beta-lactamases. Canadian Haemophilus Study Group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1678–80. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.7.1678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Murphy TF. Branhamella catarrhalis: Epidemiology, surface antigenic structure and immune response. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60:267–79. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.2.267-279.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bootsma HJ, van Dijk H, Verhoef J, Fleer A, Mooi FR. Molecular characterization of the BRO beta-lactamase of Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:966–72. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.4.966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wallace RJ, Steingrube VA, Nash DR. BRO beta-lactamases of Branhamella catarrhalis and subgenus Moraxella, including evidence for chromosomal beta-lactamase transfer by conjugation in B catarrhalis, M nonliquefaciens, and M lacunata. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33:1845–54. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.11.1845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schwartz B, Bell DM, Hughes JM. Preventing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance: A call for action by clinicians, public health officials and patients. JAMA. 1997;278:944–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.11.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gonzales R, Steiner JF, Sande MA. Antibiotic prescribing for adults with colds, upper respiratory tract infections, and bronchitis by ambulatory care physicians. JAMA. 1997;278:901–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fujita K, Murono K, Yoshikawa, Murai T. Decline of erythromycin resistance of group A streptococci in Japan. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994;13:1075–8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199412000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Seppala H, Klaukka T, Vuopio-Varkila J, et al. The effect of changes in the consumption of macrolide antibiotics on erythromycin resistance in group A streptococci in Finland. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:441–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199708143370701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES