Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2011 Nov 28;108(51):E1423–E1432. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111712108

Complex microbiome underlying secondary and primary metabolism in the tunicate-Prochloron symbiosis

Mohamed S Donia a,1, W Florian Fricke b, Frédéric Partensky c,d, James Cox e, Sherif I Elshahawi f, James R White b, Adam M Phillippy b,2, Michael C Schatz b,3, Joern Piel g, Margo G Haygood f, Jacques Ravel b, Eric W Schmidt a,h,4
PMCID: PMC3251135  PMID: 22123943

Abstract

The relationship between tunicates and the uncultivated cyanobacterium Prochloron didemni has long provided a model symbiosis. P. didemni is required for survival of animals such as Lissoclinum patella and also makes secondary metabolites of pharmaceutical interest. Here, we present the metagenomes, chemistry, and microbiomes of four related L. patella tunicate samples from a wide geographical range of the tropical Pacific. The remarkably similar P. didemni genomes are the most complex so far assembled from uncultivated organisms. Although P. didemni has not been stably cultivated and comprises a single strain in each sample, a complete set of metabolic genes indicates that the bacteria are likely capable of reproducing outside the host. The sequences reveal notable peculiarities of the photosynthetic apparatus and explain the basis of nutrient exchange underlying the symbiosis. P. didemni likely profoundly influences the lipid composition of the animals by synthesizing sterols and an unusual lipid with biofuel potential. In addition, L. patella also harbors a great variety of other bacterial groups that contribute nutritional and secondary metabolic products to the symbiosis. These bacteria possess an enormous genetic potential to synthesize new secondary metabolites. For example, an antitumor candidate molecule, patellazole, is not encoded in the genome of Prochloron and was linked to other bacteria from the microbiome. This study unveils the complex L. patella microbiome and its impact on primary and secondary metabolism, revealing a remarkable versatility in creating and exchanging small molecules.

Keywords: ascidian, metagenomics, photosynthesis, natural products


Ascidians, a class of tunicates (phylum: Chordata), are found in marine ecosystems worldwide, and some (e.g., Ciona intestinalis) are model organisms as “invertebrate” chordates. Within this large group, ascidians of the family Didemnidae are abundant components of shallow marine environments (Fig. 1) (1, 2). Didemnid ascidians comprise colonies of as many as thousands of individual zooids that filter seawater, consuming bacteria and other small particles (3). Zooids are embedded in a common tunic, which is composed largely of cellulose, and despite maintaining all the necessary organs for individual survival, they coordinate many of their functions (4). For example, zooids expel the filtered seawater through shared cavities. Colonies can fuse and divide in the course of days, and they exhibit coordinated movement of the tunic (57). In environments such as seagrass beds and coral reefs, didemnid ascidians are often major components of the ecosystem, and they have been shown to play roles in the environment such as smothering scleractinian corals (8, 9), potentially impacting reef structure. Didemnids have been extensively studied for their unique biology and also because they contain a rich array of natural products that have found clinical and preclinical applications (10, 11).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Prochloron-bearing ascidians. (A) L. patella is shown at center, flanked by two other Prochloron-bearing species. (B) D. molle. (C) Light micrographs showing approximately 10-μm-diameter P. didemni cells examined in this study.

The survival of many didemnids directly depends upon the presence of symbiotic bacteria that fulfill primary and secondary metabolic functions. However, very few ascidians have been analyzed for their microbiological content. A particularly well studied example is a subset of didemnid ascidians obligately associated with Prochloron didemni and related cyanobacteria (Fig. 1) (12, 13). Although in these symbiotic associations the ascidians still filter-feed, P. didemni provides a large percentage (as much as 100% in some cases) of required carbon via photosynthesis (1417). In addition, experimental evidence indicates that P. didemni participates in nitrogen recycling, and possibly even in obtaining nitrogen from nitrate or dinitrogen (12, 17, 18). An intriguing feature of P. didemni is the presence of chlorophyll (chl) b, like in plants, a quite unusual trait for a cyanobacterium (19, 20). The presence of both chla and chlb extends the P. didemni light-harvesting capacity into the blue and orange/red regions of the visible light spectrum, which is useful in the shallow-water habitat of the host ascidians (12). P. didemni thus allows didemnid ascidians to thrive in nutrient-poor, light-rich environments of the tropics. Didemnids have also been found to contain other types of microbes, but unlike P. didemni, without extensive in vivo functional studies (2129).

Aside from the use of ascidians as model organisms for studying eukaryotic biology and symbiosis, ascidians have also been extensively surveyed because they commonly contain secondary metabolites with pharmaceutical potential. Approximately 1,000 structurally diverse, bioactive natural products have been isolated from ascidians, including many from didemnid ascidians (10). Many of these compounds are thought to be produced by symbiotic bacteria, based in a few cases on molecular evidence. For example, it has been firmly established that cyanobactin natural products, which are the major small molecules found in many didemnid ascidians, are actually produced by symbiotic P. didemni (3032), and recently the producer of ecteinascidin-743 has been identified (33). The cyanobacterial symbiont also has the genetic capacity to produce a large number of other secondary metabolites, leading us to speculate that Prochloron was probably responsible for making most or all the potently bioactive natural products found in Prochloron-containing ascidians (34). However, the origin of the vast majority of “ascidian” natural products has yet to be studied. Clearly, P. didemni cannot synthesize most of them, as the genus Prochloron only occurs in a small subset of Ascidiacea.

To examine these problems in detail, we have been engaged in an effort to sequence P. didemni and the L. patella metagenome. Initially, we analyzed sample L1 collected in Palau in 2002 and have reported progress toward sequencing the P. didemni genome therein (which we named P1) (30, 34, 35). Since that time, we have also studied the P. didemni fractions P2 and P3 from the two metagenomic samples L2 and L3 collected in Fiji and the Solomon Islands in 2006. Preliminary analysis focusing only on secondary metabolism was previously published and showed that P. didemni populations within each ascidian host seemed to share the same genotype and that secondary metabolite gene clusters were among the main variable features between otherwise remarkably syntenic genomes from different ascidian hosts (34, 36).

Here, we report the final assembly, functional annotation, and detailed analysis and comparison of P1 and of the P2 and P3 draft genome sequences from the L2 and L3 metagenomic assemblies, with the aim to better understand the host/symbiont relationship. In addition, we present the newly sequenced P4 genome from L. patella collected in Papua New Guinea in 2007. We aimed to determine which genomic features are responsible for the unusual primary metabolic integration of host and bacteria, as well as to better define the largely unknown biosynthetic origin of marine natural products. We therefore used a comprehensive ascidian microbiome analysis that, besides deep metagenome sequencing, included amplicon sequencing, microscopy, cultivation, chemical analysis, and other methods. We report that, in addition to P. didemni, a significant diversity of other bacterial strains contributes to the observed chemical diversity in ascidian metagenomes. Taken together, these results explain the genomic basis of metabolic integration in the L. patella symbiotic model system and led to the discovery of many biosynthetic pathways to small molecules of pharmaceutical and biotechnological interest (e.g., for biofuel production).

Results

P. didemni Genomes.

We report the final assembly of the P. didemni P1 genome, consisting of 100 contigs on 32 scaffolds with a total length of 6,197,726 bp (accession no. AGRF00000000), as well as the three additional annotated draft genomes P2, P3, and P4 from metagenomic assemblies of three L. patella samples (L2–L4; accession nos. AFSJ00000000, AFSK00000000, and AGGA00000000). The improved P. didemni P1 genome assembly reported here was annotated and compared with the P2, P3, and P4 P. didemni metagenome components (Fig. 2). The P1 assembly is noteworthy taking into consideration the large size of the genome, the complex bacterial diversity and host DNA present in the sample (as detailed later), and the abundance of repetitive elements as well as duplicated genes within the P. didemni genomes. Because most other well assembled genomes from human or insect gut metagenomes are approximately half the size of the P. didemni genome (37), to the best of our knowledge, this represents the largest assembled genome from an uncultivated organism.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The P. didemni genome. The P1 genome, shown as the outer red circle, is compared with genomes from different cyanobacteria (blue and pink circles). The staggering red circle fragments represent the 32 scaffolds of the P1 genome; contigs are separated by black lines. Continuous blue circles indicate regions of greater than 85% DNA sequence identity between P1 and the P4, P2, and P3 genomes (from outside to inside, respectively). Green bars show the location of insecticidal toxin at bottom and secondary metabolite gene clusters at upper right that are present in P1 and P4, but not P2 or P3. Scattered blue bars indicate regions with greater than 85% DNA sequence identity between P. didemni and the cyanobacteria Cyanothece sp. ATCC 51142 (GenBank accession no. CP000806), Nostoc punctiforme PCC 73102 (GenBank accession no. CP001037), and Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413 (GenBank accession no. CP000117). The pink bars indicate regions of greater than 60% translated protein sequence identity between P1 and Cyanothece sp. ATCC51142, showing that these two cyanobacterial species share a large set of core proteins despite a lack of nucleotide sequence homology. The innermost black line shows trinucleotide composition (χ2) of the P1 draft genome, indicating regions of possible lateral gene transfer. This analysis is biased as a result of the presence of sequence gaps.

Although P. didemni sequences have not been observed outside of certain symbiotic environments and P. didemni has resisted stable cultivation, the cyanobacterium exhibits several major differences from other described obligate symbionts (38). This includes the apparent absence of genome reduction, the presence of a full set of primary metabolic genes, and a G+C content relatively standard for free-living cyanobacteria (i.e., 41–42%). This is consistent with previous studies showing that vertical transmission is not the only way that hosts can acquire P. didemni (3943). Although some host ascidians appear to require P. didemni for survival, our genome-sequencing data indicate that this relationship may be metabolically facultative for the bacteria. For example, despite reports that P. didemni may be auxotrophic for tryptophan (44), a full set of tryptophan anabolic genes was found in the P. didemni genomes.

Ascidian Microbiome.

Beyond P. didemni, all sequenced samples contained DNA from other bacteria living with the ascidian and from the ascidian itself (35), which accounted for a significant portion of the total assembled metagenome in L2 (16.3 of 23.8 Mbp) and L3 (1.2 of 7.0 Mbp). Table 1 includes a summary of methods and sequencing data. The sequenced samples were obtained both by squeezing the animals to release bacteria (all samples) and by extracting DNA from whole pieces of tunic (L2). The bacteria are described in detail in ensuing sections, but, briefly, they are dominated by Proteobacteria, with other phyla contributing to varying degrees depending upon the sample. Some of these bacteria are involved in persistent associations important to the chemistry of the holobionts. The Whole Genome Shotgun projects (representing fragments >500 bp in length) have been deposited in the DNA Data Base in Japan, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, and GenBank under the accession numbers AFSJ00000000 (L2) and AFSK00000000 (L3).

Table 1.

Summary of analytical methods used in this study

Sample ID
Method of analysis L1/P1 L2/P2 L3/P3 P4 L5 05–019 06–014 06–028 06–029 07–021
16S PCR sequencing Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No
 454 sequencing reads 4942 4336 4140
  Cyanobacteria 75% 85% 98%
  Proteobacteria 19% 6% 1%
  Actinobacteria ND 1% ND
 Sanger sequencing reads No 173 51 No 39 No No 75 No
Whole metagenome sequencing Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No
 Sanger sequencing reads, thousands 108 No No No
 454 read number, millions 1.29 2.84 0.39 1.30
 454 sequencing nucleotides, Mbp 133 1,072 150 416
 Total assembly, thousands of contigs* NM 191 16 1.8
 Total assembly, Mbp* NM 69 10 6.1
 Total assembly submitted (contigs > 500 bp), Mbp* 6.2 24 7.0 5.8
 Fosmid end-sequencing read number 480 670 No No
Prochloron in fosmids, % 82% 90% NA NA
Prochloron genome Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No
 Manual assembly Yes No No No
 Manual annotation Yes Part Part No
 No. of contigs 100 869 1,093 1,753
 Total assembly, Mbp 6.20 6.00 5.27 6.07
Microbiome analysis Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No
 Functional binning No Yes Yes No
 Phylogenetic binning No Yes Yes No
Biosynthetic gene analysis Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No
P. didemni analyzed Yes Yes Yes Yes
 Biosynthetic genes found >50 276 >120 NM
 KS number of amplicons (unique) NM 44 (32) 25 (24) NM 8 (2)
Microscopy Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes
 Filamentous cyanobacteria No Yes Yes No No No
 Eukaryotic microbes No Yes No No No No
Cultivated isolates No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No
Salinispora 19 3 1
Verrucosispora 1 ND ND
Streptomyces ND 1 1
Chemical analysis Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
 LC-MS analysis Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
  Cyanobactins Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No
  Patellazoles No Yes Yes No No No No
1H NMR analysis Yes Yes Yes No No No No

This table lists data acquired and should not be used comparatively, as samples were not treated identically. ND, not detected; NM, not measured.

*For P1, we had a much higher quality, manual P1 assembly that was submitted to GenBank. Therefore, this assembly focused only on P. didemni, whereas for P2 and P3, the assembly files submitted to GenBank included DNA for other bacteria and the ascidian as well.

Impact of Symbiotic Bacteria on Primary Metabolism.

Systematic screening of photosynthetic genes shows that P. didemni seemingly possesses a complete photosynthetic apparatus and carbon fixation machinery (Fig. 3). However, compared with model cyanobacteria, it exhibits a number of peculiarities, which are directly related to its specific environment. These features include an expanded family of integral membrane, chl a/b-binding light-harvesting complex proteins (usually called Pcb for “prochlorophyte chl-binding proteins”) (45). Former studies had revealed the presence of two distantly related pcb genes organized in tandem (pcbA and pcbC) (46), as well as one isiA-like gene (45). Inspection of the P. didemni genome shows that the latter gene is itself organized in a (possibly iron stress-induced) cluster with a unique member of the pcb family (ORF00655 in P1) that we propose to call pcbD.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Metabolic interactions in the ascidian metagenome. L. patella (Lower Right, schematic of tunic containing zooid and other bacteria) obtains nutrients and secondary metabolites from P. didemni and from other bacteria.

No phycobiliproteins, the components of the antenna complexes found in typical cyanobacteria (phycobilisomes), had hitherto been reported in Prochloron (reviewed in refs. 12, 47, 48). However, the P. didemni genome contains homologues of genes encoding a form of C-phycocyanin with an α-subunit (encoded by cpcA) showing several variations with respect to known sequences. This includes a unique 7-aa deletion between positions 65 and 71 and a modified amino acid environment around the phycocyanobilin chromophore-binding cysteinyl residue (Cys-77). Similarly, all sequenced Prochlorococcus strains possess genes encoding an atypical phycoerythrin as the sole phycobiliprotein, which was hypothesized to be a photoreceptor (49, 50). In Prochlorococcus cells, these genes were shown to be expressed at low levels, and the phycobiliprotein gene product was found in small but significant amounts (49, 50). Further analyses are therefore needed to check whether P. didemni cpcBA operon is also expressed at low levels.

Another peculiarity of the photosynthetic apparatus of P. didemni is the huge number (e.g., n = 31 in P1) and organization of hli genes encoding high light-induced proteins (51), also called small cab-like proteins or Scps (52). These small proteins, possessing one (and sometimes two) transmembrane helix, belong to the plant Lhc protein family. They are thought to be involved in the absorption of excess excitation energy, allowing the cells to cope more efficiently with the production of reactive oxygen species (51), and/or in transient chl carriage (53). Despite their large number, there are only three or four hli gene types in each strain. One of them (e.g., ORF02209 in P1) is isolated in the genome and is most similar to the hliD gene of Synechocystis sp. PCC6803, whereas all others are homologues of Synechocystis hliC and are generally gathered into gene clusters. Their very close similarity at nucleotide level as well as organization in clusters strongly suggest that they result from recent events of gene duplication. We interpret this multiplication of hli genes in P. didemni, which is reminiscent of that previously reported for high light-adapted Prochlorococcus (54) as a photoprotective mechanism. As Prochlorococcus and Prochloron are taxonomically unrelated but share some photosynthetic features (39), this probably reflects functional convergence.

Like most cyanobacteria, P. didemni contains a form 1B 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase that is protected from oxygen by β-carboxysomes (55). Consistent with its symbiotic association with an animal and the resulting constant availability of CO2, P. didemni possesses only a minimal set of genes involved in CO2 transport, consisting of a specialized NADH dehydrogenase complex (encoded by homologues of Synechocystis ndhD4 and ndhF4 genes) that takes up CO2 with low affinity and converts it to HCO3 within the cell. It lacks many transporters found in other cyanobacteria, including those involved in high-affinity CO2 uptake (NdhD3-F3) and the low-CO2 inducible bicarbonate transporters SbtA and CmpA-D (55).

Early reports indicated that P. didemni may exchange its photosynthetically derived carbon with the host largely in the form of glycolate (56). However, a full contingent of glycolate oxidase and other glycolate metabolic genes are present in the genome. Based on estimated nitrogen budgets, P. didemni–ascidian associations rely on recycled nitrogen to supplement their filter-feeding diet (17). As predicted by experiment (57, 58), P. didemni contains genes required to take up ammonia and convert it into glutamine via the GS–GOGAT pathway. There is also an operon encoding urease and a complete urea transport system, indicating that P. didemni likely can take up urea, a major waste product of ascidians (59). In addition to using host sources of nitrogen, some strains of P. didemni have also been reported to incorporate nitrate (12) and to fix atmospheric nitrogen (18, 60). The genome-sequenced strains harbor complete nitrate reduction pathways, as would be required for conversion of nitrate to ammonium, but no nitrogenases or related genes were found in the four sequenced metagenomes. P. didemni and hosts are therefore tightly coupled, with fixed carbon provided by the bacteria and recycled nitrogen originating with the host's filter-feeding diet, and not from fixation of atmospheric nitrogen.

Because nifD and nifH genes that are essential to nitrogen fixation were not found in P. didemni, we decided to extend the search to the remaining microbiomes. By using multiple published nifD and nifH sequences that explored the diverse nif subtypes, we performed tBLASTn searches on approximately 90 Mbp of total assembled sequence data in L2 and L3. No nitrogenase homologues were found in either sample, but the BLAST searches were robust, as revealed by numerous hits to more distantly related proteins such as protochlorophyllide reductase. In addition, BLAST searching of unassembled reads from the metagenomes did not reveal any putative nitrogenases in 5.9 million individual reads (average length of ∼400 bp). Based on the metagenome and the assembled P. didemni genomes, nitrogen recycling in P. didemni is likely to be the most important source of fixed nitrogen for this system, and nitrogen fixation is probably not possible except by a previously undiscovered class of nitrogenase enzyme or in a minor component of the microbiome. It remains possible that dinitrogen fixation is a variable property, and that bacteria in other L. patella samples fix nitrogen.

We used the automated CloVR-Metagenomics pipeline (61) to examine functional gene content compositions in the unassembled non-Prochloron metagenomic datasets based on assignment of sequence reads to the Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COG) database (62) by BLASTx (Fig. S1). Interestingly, the second most highly represented COG category was transporters, after proteins affecting nucleic acids. This observation may be a unique feature of this system, at least in comparison with other microbiome reports, reflecting the complex chemical exchange underlying this symbiosis.

Impact of Bacteria on Secondary Metabolism.

P. didemni is responsible for many, but not all, of the secondary metabolites isolated from didemnid ascidians (34), and some of these are potent toxins (63). Here, we show that P. didemni also contains the genetic capacity to make several other compounds that greatly contribute to the overall chemical constitution of the holobiont, and that the remaining microbiome also contributes to the potent chemical arsenal of L. patella (Fig. 2).

Analysis of the P. didemni genome indicates that many compounds isolated from the whole animals are manufactured by the cyanobacterial symbionts. Pigments, lipids, and secondary metabolites significantly affect composition of the overall symbioses. For example, P. didemni is protected from excess UV irradiation by the presence of mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs), which are specifically localized to tunic bladder cells of the ascidian (64, 65). MAA biosynthetic genes are predominantly found in cyanobacteria, but also exist in the genomes of eukaryotes (66, 67). The P. didemni genome clearly encodes MAA biosynthesis. Other cyanobacterial pigments were encoded in the P. didemni genomes.

P. didemni also synthesizes the most abundant lipids found in the samples. We previously predicted that a P. didemni polyketide synthase (PKS) gene, gaz, was responsible for synthesizing terminal olefin lipids (34). Based on this information, recently Pfleger and coworkers reported that other cyanobacteria use a related gene to make nonadec-1-ene and derivatives (68). Following this analysis, here we used GC-MS and comparison with authentic standards to show that some of the L. patella samples contain abundant heptadec-1-ene (Fig. 4). This compound was found in several slices of tunic, which includes bacteria but is also rich in ascidian cells. This potential biofuel has not previously been detected in animals to the best of our knowledge. Further work is required to definitively connect this gene to the lipid product, but the accurate prediction and subsequent discovery of this compound is highly suggestive. GC-MS analysis of ascidian samples L1–L3 revealed that the animals also contain abundant alkanes, which were previously known from these animals and from P. didemni samples (69). Recent work shows that these alkanes are, in fact, common cyanobacterial products (70). The P. didemni genome thus defines a second major route to gasoline-like compounds in cyanobacteria and indicates that P. didemni may profoundly impact the membrane chemistry of the host animals. Although the compounds were not localized in this study, their relative abundance in whole tissue suggests that they might not be strictly localized to cyanobacteria.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Hydrocarbons and sterols in P. didemni. (A) GC-MS of an ascidian extract from a tissue slice containing the animal and bacteria (Top) and a standard of heptadec-1-ene (Bottom). (B) Fragmentation pattern of peak at 9.87 min in extract (Top) and control (Bottom), showing that these compounds are identical. The additional peak at 9.91 is an internal C17 olefin almost certainly resulting from the decarboxylative pathway to fatty acids. (C) GC-MS showing lanosterol-based lipids found in whole ascidian extracts. (D) Fragmentation pattern of C, showing observed spectra (above the lines in red) against expected spectra (below the lines in blue). These spectra indicate that lanosterol and an oxidized derivative are present in the ascidian sample.

As another example, we found a gene that was predicted to make lanosterol and oxidized lanosterol derivatives, with some similarities to pathways found in a small subset of other bacteria (71). Indeed, GC-MS analysis of L. patella tunic sections reveals that the holobiont contains abundant lanosterol and several oxidized lanosterol metabolites as the major sterols, with a relatively smaller abundance of cholesterol and derivatives (Fig. 4). This is a very unusual finding, in that previous reports of ascidians describe largely cholesterol as the major sterol (69). To the best of our knowledge, lanosterol has not been previously described in ascidians, and its prediction in P. didemni on the basis of genome sequencing is highly suggestive that P. didemni synthesizes the major sterols isolated from the animals.

Although the biosynthesis of most compounds that could be identified in ascidian extracts could be assigned to P. didemni, there was one compound class that we were unable to assign to these cyanobacteria despite extensive effort: patellazoles (72). These potently cytotoxic compounds were found in L2 and L3, but not L1, and no biosynthetic genes explaining patellazoles could be identified in the P. didemni genome sequences. We thus hypothesized that patellazoles would be made by other symbiotic bacteria. As patellazoles have been isolated (albeit rarely) from L. patella samples since the early 1980s, such an association would represent a second dimension of stable bacterial symbiosis within these ascidians. Patellazoles also belong to a large family of biologically active ascidian metabolites, meaning that solving this problem would provide insight into important ascidian compounds from diverse species.

On the basis of structure, patellazoles are almost certainly hybrid PKS-nonribosomal peptide synthetase products. Furthermore, we predicted that patellazoles were likely made by the subclass of PKS enzymes in which the acyltransferase (AT) domain acts in trans (73). Therefore, we constructed a small database of known biosynthetic genes from polyketide, ribosomal, and nonribosomal peptide pathways and used it for tBLASTn searches against the L1, L2, and L3 metagenomes, consisting of raw reads before assembly. After filtering out Prochloron hits and genes that, on further analysis, were not relevant to natural products, we obtained 276 single reads and short contigs with predicted biosynthetic coding potential from sample L2 after extensive analysis (Fig. S2). In addition, at least 50 and 120 biosynthetic genes were identified by similar methods from L1 and L3, respectively, and as more sequence data were acquired, the number of new genes did not appear to reach a plateau. The resulting sequences were analyzed in detail as follows. Domains were classified based on Pfam (74) hits and on the taxonomy of the bacteria harboring the closest related sequence (Fig. S2). It should be emphasized that this phylogenetic call is weak for secondary metabolism genes, which often undergo extensive horizontal gene transfer.

Because of the large amount of total DNA sequence obtained by metagenome sequencing (1,072 Mbp, unassembled, in case of L2), we expected to achieve a plateau, indicating that more sequencing would not lead to greatly increased numbers of identified biosynthetic genes. However, more sequence provided ever more biosynthetic gene hits. Therefore, a nested degenerate PCR strategy was developed to amplify ketosynthase (KS) domains from PKS genes but not the predominant P. didemni PKS, gaz. PCR products obtained were cloned, and inserts were sequenced from 69 individual clones from L2 and L3, leading to 56 unique KS genes. Most of these genes were closely related to cyanobacterial and proteobacterial KSs and represented both cis- and trans-AT PKSs (Fig. 5). Interestingly, KS sequences were obtained with high protein sequence identity (>90%) to KS amplicons from other marine sources such as dinoflagellates and sponges. None of these amplicons overlapped with the metagenomic sequencing reads.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Phylogenetic analysis of PCR-amplified KS domains. All unique (<95% sequence identical) KS clones obtained as described in Materials and Methods were used to generate a phylogenetic tree. Red indicates sequences derived from L2; blue indicates sequences derived from L3; green indicates sequences derived from L5; and black indicates previously described sequence relatives. Maximum parsimony analysis (Mega 5) was used to generate this phylogenetic tree with a bootstrap test of 1,000 replicates. Bootstrap values greater than 50% are shown. Clade names are provided based on the origin of previously identified sequences. For example, the sponge-like clade contains sequences that are most closely related to amplicons previously identified from sponges such as Discodermia (84, 96) (However, these are not the sponge-specific sup genes from Poribacteria). trans-AT PKS genes form their own ancient clade regardless of sequence origin (76).

It was previously shown that, in some sponges, there is a relatively small number of trans-AT PKSs in comparison with the cis-AT PKSs, and this small group is often involved in synthesizing compounds that were previously isolated from the whole sponges (75). We used a recently developed phylogenetic method to classify short KS reads of the trans-AT group according to the chemistry of their products (Fig. 5) (75, 76). Some of these genes were only found in patellazole-containing ascidians, and not in other didemnid ascidians, including other samples of L. patella (Fig. 6). For example, by PCR, we showed that only L2 and L3 contained the trans-AT gene PKS_11, whereas three other L. patella samples were both patellazole- and PKS_11-negative. The PKS_11 amplicon from L3 was 97% identical on the DNA level to that from L2. Similarly, several other gene products were discovered in the metagenome that could contribute to patellazole biosynthesis, such as PKS_100. Whether or not PKS_11 or these other genes are responsible for patellazole biosynthesis, this analysis showed that bacteria other than Prochloron form persistent associations with L. patella that contribute to diverse natural products from ascidians. Further analysis of the putative patellazoles biosynthetic gene cluster is in progress.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Correlation of PKS genes with patellazoles. (A) Patellazoles were found only in L2 and L3 among our extensive ascidian collection examined between 2002 and 2007, which includes many L. patella samples and many other species of Prochloron-bearing didemnids. (B) As an example of the genetic approach, PKS_11 was found in ascidians containing patellazoles but not in ascidians lacking patellazoles, including adjacent colonies on the reef. Further work is required to definitively connect these genes to patellazoles biosynthesis.

Origin of Chemical and Biological Diversity in Ascidians.

The three most closely examined P. didemni genomes (P1, P2, and P3) were very similar with respect to gene synteny and total coding potential (Fig. 2). In particular, no significant differences were found in primary metabolism, indicating that all three strains have the genomic potential to contribute similarly to their hosts’ nutrition. Differences between these genomes were dominated by hypothetical proteins and by families of overrepresented proteins that were present in many paralogous copies. These families included highly duplicated and repetitive sequences such as YD repeats, ankyrins, transposases, and lectins, as well as several apparently surface-associated proteins. These surface proteins are commonly variable and have been shown in other contexts to change rapidly in response to interactions with viruses or hosts (77). Comparative analysis and genome assembly was complicated by an unusually large number of repetitive sequences between and within genes that reduced the apparent similarity. By using our approach of 454 Life Sciences deep-sequencing, a large amount of sequence data were obtained for each metagenomic dataset. Like any other sequencing technology, 454 has an intrinsic error rate, so errors accumulate as more sequence data are collected. These errors should be removed during the assembly process, when multiple sequences are aligned to suppress errors. However, in highly sequence-repetitive regions, difficulties arise because the assembler has problems distinguishing between true sequence variations and those that arise from sequencing errors. Briefly, in repetitive regions, it is difficult to tell whether an observed difference between two highly related sequences reflects an actual difference in the genome, or whether it is a sequencing artifact, leading to problems in assembling highly repetitive regions. However, in the P1 Prochloron draft genome, most of these regions could be assembled correctly, as we also had extensive Sanger sequencing and manual assembly data, and only a small minority of repetitive regions were problematic (leading to 100 contigs in P1 instead of a closed genome). These methods enabled us to accurately identify many different repetitive sequences in the genomes, including long repeats, duplicated genes, and short repeats.

As one of many examples of short repeats, the gaz PKS leads to synthesis of terminal olefins described earlier and is found in all four samples. gaz contained the repeat sequence, CAAAACAA, previously observed as a phase-shifting repeat in Neisseria gonorrheae pilin biosynthesis (78). In genomes P1, P2, and P3, different copy numbers of this sequence element were observed within the KS and AT regions of gaz. The major metabolic gene differences among the P. didemni strains examined lie in secondary metabolism, as previously described (34), and also in the presence of other types of toxin genes such as a gene cluster encoding insecticidal toxin-like proteins, present in P1 and P4 but absent in P2 and P3.

Beyond P. didemni, ascidian hosts were found to possess a variable array of other bacteria, including those potentially responsible for patellazole biosynthesis. Microbial content of L1–L3 was examined by five methods: (i) PCR amplification of 16S genes from each sample and both pyrosequencing more than 4,000 amplicons and Sanger sequencing of 338 clones; (ii) shotgun metagenome sequencing of more than 3 Gbp of DNA isolated from the whole samples; (iii) observation by confocal microscopy; (iv) cultivation of Actinobacteria; and (v) end sequencing from fosmid libraries. All five methods indicated a highly diverse bacterial population, comprising approximately 10% to 20% of the bacterial content in L1–L3. The other 80% to 90% of bacteria were made up solely of clonal populations of P. didemni. Results from all five methods provided very similar and complementary data on the microbial diversity within ascidians.

16S PCR amplicons were sequenced by 454 and classified by using the automated CloVR-16S pipeline (61). Totals of 75%, 89%, and 98% of the sequences from L1, L2, and L3, respectively, clearly originated from the phylum Cyanobacteria, which was dominated by P. didemni sequences (Fig. 7). Proteobacteria was the second largest phylum in the three ascidians, representing 75%, 55%, and 50% of the noncyanobacterial sequences in L1, L2, and L3, respectively. Within this large group, the three ascidians contained mostly Alphaproteobacteria, followed by Gammaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria. 16S PCR products were also analyzed by Sanger sequencing for L2 and L3, which provided genus-level resolution (as detailed later).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

16S rRNA gene analysis. Visualization of the 16S analysis results by CloVR-16S: (A) Percentages of 16S sequences assigned to major taxonomic classes, with individual classes represented by different colors. All samples are dominated by Cyanobacteria, which includes P. didemni. (B) Complete-linkage (furthest neighbor) clustering of taxonomic classes based on log-normalized counts in each sample, as indicated by color in the scale bar. (C) Rarefaction curves showing that samples L1 and L2 contain more diverse and incompletely sampled microbial communities compared with L3.

Microbial community compositions of L2 and L3 were also explored based on total metagenomic sequences, by using the automated CloVR-Metagenomics pipeline (60), which makes phylogenetic assignments of individual sequence reads based on BLASTn searches against the National Center for Biotechnology Information Reference Sequence database of bacterial and archaeal genomes. For this classification, P. didemni reads were removed by in silico subtractive hybridization (BLASTn against the P1 genome, e-value of 1.0 × 10−50). The CloVR-Metagenomics results correlated very closely to those from the 16S analysis, in that most of the sequences could be assigned to Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria and smaller fractions to Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Spirochaetes (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Taxonomical classification of the non-Prochloron microbiome. P. didemni reads were subtracted from the total metagenome by BLASTn, and the remaining sequences were taxonomically assigned by using CloVR-Metagenomics. The results of complete-linkage (furthest neighbor) clustering of taxonomic classes based on relative counts are shown. The colors indicate the relative ratios of the reads in each sample on a logarithmic scale, as shown in the scale bar.

To scaffold the Prochloron genome, we constructed fosmid libraries from the same DNA samples, obtained by squeezing the ascidian sample, and end-sequenced 480 clones from L1 and 670 clones from L2. In L1, 82% of the clones were assigned to Prochloron and 18% to the host and other bacteria. In L2, approximately 90% of the clones were predicted to originate from Prochloron and approximately 10% were assigned to the host and other bacteria. These proportions resembled closely the community compositions determined by 16S rRNA and metagenome sequencing.

Sequencing data revealed that a large portion of the microbiome was cyanobacterial. Initially, it was thought that P. didemni was the only major cyanobacterium. However, analysis of biosynthetic reads and KS amplicons from L2 and L3 revealed genes that are clearly cyanobacterial in origin but are not part of the Prochloron genome. Because cyanobacterial cells and especially filaments are easily detectable by microscopy, we undertook a comparative approach by using fixed samples from L2, L3, and three other Prochloron-containing didemnid ascidians. Long filamentous cyanobacteria were observed in fixed specimens of L2 and L3 in an abundance of approximately 1 per 100 Prochloron cells (Fig. 9 and Fig. S3). These filaments were not observed in other related ascidians examined, including L1. In L2, fewer than 10% of cyanobacterial 454 16S reads originated from cyanobacteria other than Prochloron. These sequences appeared to be dominated by the Oscillatoriales, especially Leptolyngbya spp., and also by unclassified (uncultivated) cyanobacteria. Calothrix was also identified by Sanger sequencing of 16S PCR clone libraries. Filamentous cyanobacteria have previously been observed in Prochloron-bearing didemnids on several occasions, but not from L. patella (2329). A few eukaryotic microbes, such as diatoms and dinoflagellates, were observed in L2 but not in L1 (Fig. 9 and Fig. S3).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Microbiological approaches. By light microscopy, other bacteria beyond P. didemni such as filamentous cyanobacteria (A) and diatoms (B) were found in L2 and L3, but not L1 or other ascidians. Cultivation analysis led to isolation of many natural product synthesizing strains, such as Salinispora (C) and Verrucosispora. Figs. S3 and S4 show more details.

16S rDNA pyrosequencing revealed that more than 1% of L2 sequences originated in Actinobacteria, which are important producers of natural products. We therefore investigated the actinobacterial community using a cultivation-based approach with frozen tissue (Fig. 9 and Fig. S4). By 16S rRNA analysis, the major cultivable group in L2 (19 colonies) was assigned to the species Salinispora arenicola [99% identity to 16S rRNA genes from the sequenced strain CNS-205 (79)], and another colony belonged to Verrucosispora. Both genera are considered to be relatively rare components of marine sediments that are important natural product makers. The presence of S. arenicola in the L2 sample was further supported by comparative analysis of selected secondary metabolic gene clusters from our isolate, S. arenicola PZ-M17, with the previously reported genome of S. arenicola CNS 205. Amplicons were sequenced showing that S. arenicola PZ-M17 encodes several PKS and nonribosomal peptide synthetase genes that are unique to our strain and several that are found in the sequenced strain. These results suggest that the ascidian isolates resemble their sediment relatives but also contain additional unique biosynthetic gene clusters.

To confirm that these isolates resulted from a persistent bacteria–ascidian association, we next examined cultivated isolates from L3 and another Solomon Islands ascidian sample (Didemnum molle 06–028, collected within several meters of L3). From L3, we recovered strains with 99% 16S rRNA sequence identity to S. arenicola. From 06-028, we isolated a strain that is 99% identical (in its 16S rDNA sequence) to Salinispora pacifica. No Salinispora sequences were identified in the whole metagenome sequencing reads, either because of their low abundance or potentially because of the relative difficulty of DNA extraction for these spore-forming Actinobacteria.

Discussion

L. patella harbors a complex microbiome consisting of multiple players that contribute to the primary and secondary metabolism of this ubiquitous tropical animal. Numerous methods were required to provide a comprehensive picture of the interactions between the ascidian host and its symbionts (Table 1). Here we present draft P. didemni genome sequences, obtained from complex metagenomic mixtures. The P. didemni genomes help to explain the photosynthetic and metabolic processes underlying the symbiosis and which have been shown to be critical for survival of the host animal. The whole Prochloron genomes obtained from four remote locations were remarkably syntenic and therefore displayed similar gene content, in particular factors that mediate primary and secondary metabolism. Despite some unusual features and the lack of stable cultivation, P. didemni contains intact and standard cyanobacterial primary metabolic pathways, and no genome reduction was observed. Apparently, nitrogen recycling from the host filter-feeding diet and photosynthesis are sufficient to provide these needed nutrients to the host. P. didemni also probably synthesizes some of the major lipids that are found in the holobionts, including potential biofuel molecules that were otherwise unanticipated and not discovered or sought in previous analyses of L. patella during the past 35 y, and that were only found through metagenome analysis. Within the complex L. patella environment, the non-Prochloron bacterial symbiosis appears to be largely mediated by previously underappreciated chemical interactions. For example, transporters were among the major functional groups identified in the non-Prochloron bacterial gene pool, an observation not previously recorded, to the best of our knowledge.

Ascidians differ in their metabolism, and a great variability is found in secondary metabolites. Previously, we showed that P. didemni exhibits sporadic variation of secondary metabolic genes, whereby whole pathways are present or absent in an otherwise conserved genomic background across the ocean (34). In this phenomenon, pathways are constantly exchanged between P. didemni cells across the ocean, providing the holobionts with a variable arsenal of metabolites. However, these results only partially explain the secondary metabolic variability found in ascidians. Here, we propose that symbiotic bacteria from different phyla synthesize abundant secondary metabolites isolated from single animals in great abundance. Candidate patellazole biosynthetic genes were discovered in non-Prochloron bacteria and were absent in P. didemni or host sequencing reads. Because patellazoles have been found in L. patella in different locations for the past 30 y, this indicates that non-Prochloron bacteria probably form persistent relationships with L. patella, expanding the known symbionts beyond merely P. didemni.

The genes associated with patellazoles biosynthesis belong to the trans-AT family of PKS genes. Interestingly, Riesenfeld et al. found an abundance of proteobacterial 16S sequences and trans-AT PKS genes in an Antarctic didemnid ascidian (80). This ascidian also contained palmerolide, a polyketide with some biosynthetic similarity to patellazoles and a diverse array of other ascidian polyketides. As only tropical ascidians contain Prochloron, it is clear that palmerolide, patellazoles, and related polyketides are likely synthesized by a distinct group of bacteria, which may possibly be Proteobacteria. One caveat is that the available sequences are not very similar between L. patella and the palmerolide sample. The PKS sequences are quite different at the DNA sequence level. From 16S sequences, only one of 34 palmerolide 16S clones in GenBank showed more than 95% DNA sequence identity with any of the more than 13,000 454 sequences from L1–L3. Of these, none were from L1, which exhibited a maximum of 92% identity with palmerolide clones. The single palmerolide sample clone with more than 95% identity to L. patella clones was similar to Mesorhizobium and other uncultivated symbionts from sponges. One sequence from L2 and 19 sequences from L3 were more than 95% sequence identical to this clone.

In our samples, non-Prochloron bacteria fall into large taxonomic groups that are strongly correlated with natural product synthesis in these specific samples, as shown by a broad array of techniques. By using microscopy and Sanger sequencing, filamentous cyanobacteria were found associated with L2 and L3; Proteobacteria, especially Alphaproteobacteria, but also others, were the second most abundant group in L1–L3, as shown by all techniques used. Alphaproteobacteria are the most abundant group in open ocean (81), but are also extremely common, specific symbionts and pathogens (82, 83). Interesting sequences and isolates include those for myxobacteria and actinomycetes, which are renowned for natural product synthesis but have not been previously reported in ascidians. By applying numerous techniques, the biases inherent to individual methods were overcome, providing a comprehensive picture of bacterial symbiosis in ascidians.

The abundance of biosynthetic genes, including trans-AT genes, found in this study is noteworthy compared with those resulting from related studies in other environments. For example, by using the same degenerate KS primers we used here, Hochmuth et al. obtained 30,473 sequence reads using 454 analysis from two specimens of the marine sponge Cacospongia mycofijiensis (84). Only 118 unique genes were found, and 113 belonged to one group of sponge-specific poribacterial polyketide synthases; only five potentially synthesized more elaborate polyketides. Similar results were also obtained in a metagenome analysis of the sponge Discodermia dissoluta, in that, of 256 clones sequenced, 69 were different, as defined by less than 95% sequence identity (85). In our study with ascidians, we obtained 56 unique and highly sequence-diverse amplicons from sequencing only 69 clones. As a terrestrial example, a recent study described deep metagenomic sequencing of a leaf cutter ant colony (86). Although these ants are rich in antibiotic-producing Actinobacteria, from the provided information it appears that fewer than 100 secondary metabolism gene fragments were identified in the same categories used in our analysis. These results show a huge biosynthetic potential of marine ascidians in comparison with other animals.

In conclusion, L. patella harbors a remarkable array of microbial symbionts with the capacity to produce secondary metabolites and to contribute to host survival and primary metabolism. As didemnid ascidians themselves occupy many different habitats, and didemnids represent a large amount of genetic variation between and within species, these bacteria provide an important additional dimension to understanding biodiversity in the ocean.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection, Processing, and Sequencing.

Ascidians were collected and processed as previously described (34) from the following locations and of the following species: L1, North 7° 15′ East 134° 15′ (L. patella); L2, South 17° 55′ East 177° 16′ (L. patella); L3, South 8° 57.35′ East 159° 59.12′ (L. patella); L4, South 4° 45.601′ East 151° 25.320′ (L. patella); 05–019, South 10° 15.856′ East 150° 15.856′ (L. patella); 06–014, South 9° 0.13′ East 159° 15.69′ (Prochloron-bearing didemnid); 06–028, South 8° 57.35′ East 159° 59.12′ (D. molle); 06–029, South 8° 57.35′ East 159° 59.12′ (Lissoclinum sp.); and 07–021, North 7° 21′ 0.40′′ East 134° 34′ 29.08′′ (Lissoclinum sp.; Table 1). Sequencing methods are summarized in Table 1. All sequences, except for fosmids, were assembled using Celera (87), and the resulting contigs taxonomically sorted by using PhymmBL (88). Initial assembly and statistics of P. didemni genome sequencing efforts on the P1, P2, and P3 samples are provided in the authors’ previous publication (34). Reduction to 32 scaffolds as reported here was accomplished through manual closure based on sequencing PCR product linking contigs.

Genome Sequence Annotation.

Metabolic genes and many other gene subsets of the P1 genome were manually annotated by using Manatee. The annotation was then transferred to the assembled genomes of P2, P3, and P4. Secondary metabolic gene clusters were previously annotated (34).

Total Metagenomic DNA Sequence Analysis.

Total metagenomic whole-genome shotgun DNA isolates of L2 and L3 were sequenced on the Roche/454 GS FLX Titanium platform as described before (34). Raw sequence reads were searched against the P1 draft genome sequence with BLASTN, using an e-value threshold of 1.0 × 10−50. This relatively stringent threshold was applied to remove those reads that could be assigned to P. didemni with high confidence. Reads without matches to the P1 draft genome were processed with the CloVR-Metagenomics pipeline from the CloVR package for automated and cloud computing-enabled microbial sequence analysis (89), which provides taxonomic and functional composition analyses, using BLAST searches against the COG and National Center for Biotechnology Information Reference Sequence collection. Using custom R and Perl scripts that are part of the CloVR-Metagenomics pipeline, the results were displayed as distance histograms.

Other Experiments.

Details of other experiments are provided in SI Materials and Methods.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the governments of Palau, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, and Fiji for permission to obtain samples used in this study. C. M. Ireland provided ascidian photos and opportunities for collections. M. H. Medema (University of Groningen) helped in identifying biosynthetic Pfam domains in the metagenomic reads using AntiSMASH (http://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org/). This work was funded by National Science Foundation Grant EF-0412226 for genome sequencing and analysis, by National Institutes of Health Grant GM071425 for chemical and other aspects of analysis, and by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant SFB 624 for trans-AT analysis.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the DNA Data Base in Japan (DDBJ), European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), and GenBank (accession nos. AGRF00000000, AFSJ00000000, AFSK00000000, AGGA00000000, AFSJ01000000, and AFSK01000000).

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

See Author Summary on page 20291.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1111712108/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Kott P. Algal-bearing didemnid ascidians in the Indo-west-Pacific. Mem Queensl Mus. 1980;20:1–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kott P. The Australian Ascidiacea. Part 4, Aplousobranchia (3), Didemnidae. Mem Queensl Mus. 2001;47:1–407. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brusca RC, Brusca GJ. Invertebrates. 2nd Ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hirose E. Ascidian tunic cells: Morphology and functional diversity of free cells outside the epidermis. Invertebr Biol. 2009;128:83–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ryland JS, Wigley RA, Muirhead A. Ecology and colonial dynamics of some Pacific reef flat Didemnidae (Asciadiacea) Zool J Linn Soc. 1984;80:261–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cowan ME. Field observations of colony movement and division of the ascidian Didemnum molle. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1981;6:335–337. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Birkeland C, Cheng L, Lewin RA. Motility of didemnid ascidian colonies. Bull Mar Sci. 1981;31:170–173. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bak RPM, Sybesma J, van Duyl FC. The ecology of the tropical compound ascidian Trididemnum solidum. 2. Abundance, growth and survival. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1981;6:43–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Littler MM, Littler DS. A colonial tunicate smothers corals and coralline algae on the Great Astrolabe Reef, Fiji. Coral Reefs. 1995;14:148–149. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schmidt EW, Donia MS. Life in cellulose houses: Symbiotic bacterial biosynthesis of ascidian drugs and drug leads. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010;21:827–833. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Davidson BS. Ascidians: Producers of amino acid-derived metabolites. Chem Rev. 1993;93:1771–1791. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lewin RA, Cheng L. Prochloron, a Microbial Enigma. 1st Ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hirose E, Neilan BA, Schmidt EW, Murakami A. Enigmatic life and evolution of Prochloron and related cyanobacteria inhabiting colonial ascidians. In: Gault PM, Marler HJ, editors. Handbook on Cyanobacteria. New York: Nova; 2009. pp. 161–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koike I, Suzuki T. Nutritional diversity of symbiotic ascidians in a Fijian seagrass meadow. Ecol Res. 1996;11:381–386. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kremer BP, Pardy R, Lewin RA. Carbon fixation and photosynthates of Prochloron, a green alga symbiotic with an ascidian, Lissoclinum patella. Phycologia. 1982;21:258–263. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lewin RA, Pardy RL. Photosynthetic activity of Prochloron, and translocation of metabolites to its ascidian host. Phycologia. 1981;20:109–109. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Koike I, Yamamuro M, Pollard PC. Carbon and nitrogen budgets of two ascidians and their symbiont, Prochloron, in a tropical seagrass meadow. Aust J Mar Freshwater Res. 1993;44:173–182. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Odintsov VS. Nitrogen fixation in Prochloron (Prochlorophyta)-ascidian associations - Is Prochloron responsible. Endocytobiosis Cell Res. 1991;7:253–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lewin RA. Prochlorophyta as a proposed new division of algae. Nature. 1976;261:697–698. doi: 10.1038/261697b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lewin RA, Withers NW. Extraordinary pigment composition of a prokaryotic alga. Nature. 1975;256:735–737. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shimada A, Yano N, Kanai S, Lewin RA, Maruyama T. Molecular phylogenetic relationship between two symbiotic photo-oxygenic prokaryotes, Prochloron sp. and Synechocystis trididemni. Phycologia. 2003;42:193–197. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Swingley WD, et al. Niche adaptation and genome expansion in the chlorophyll d-producing cyanobacterium Acaryochloris marina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:2005–2010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709772105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lewin RA, Cheng L. Associations of microscopic algae with didemnid ascidians. Phycologia. 1975;14:149–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miyashita H, et al. Chlorophyll d as a major pigment. Nature. 1996;383:402. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Larkum AWD, et al. A filamentous cyanophyte containing phycourobilin and symbiotic in sponges and an ascidian. Mar Biol. 1987;95:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Parry DL, Kott P. Co-symbiosis in the Ascidiacea. Bull Mar Sci. 1988;42:149–153. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hirose E, Uchida H, Murakami A. Ultrastructural and microspectrophotometric characterization of multiple species of cyanobacterial photosymbionts coexisting in the colonial ascidian Trididemnum clinides (Tunicata, Ascidiacea, Didemnidae) Eur J Phycol. 2009;44:365–375. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Groepler W, Schuett C. Bacterial community in the tunic matrix of a colonial ascidian Diplosoma migrans. Helgol Mar Res. 2003;57:139–143. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schuett C, Doepke H, Groepler W, Wichels A. Diversity of intratunical bacteria in the tunic matrix of the colonial ascidian Diplosoma migrans. Helgol Mar Res. 2005;59:136–140. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schmidt EW, et al. Patellamide A and C biosynthesis by a microcin-like pathway in Prochloron didemni, the cyanobacterial symbiont of Lissoclinum patella. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:7315–7320. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501424102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Donia MS, Ravel J, Schmidt EW. A global assembly line for cyanobactins. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:341–343. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Donia MS, et al. Natural combinatorial peptide libraries in cyanobacterial symbionts of marine ascidians. Nat Chem Biol. 2006;2:729–735. doi: 10.1038/nchembio829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rath CM, et al. Meta-omic characterization of the marine invertebrate microbial consortium that produces the chemotherapeutic natural product ET-743. ACS Chem Biol. 2011 doi: 10.1021/cb200244t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Donia MS, Fricke WF, Ravel J, Schmidt EW. Variation in tropical reef symbiont metagenomes defined by secondary metabolism. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:673–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Donia MS, Ruffner DE, Cao S, Schmidt EW. Accessing the hidden majority of marine natural products through metagenomics. ChemBioChem. 2011;12:1230–1236. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201000780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Moran NA, McCutcheon JP, Nakabachi A. Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbionts. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:165–190. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nakabachi A, et al. The 160-kilobase genome of the bacterial endosymbiont Carsonella. Science. 2006;314:267. doi: 10.1126/science.1134196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Münchhoff J, et al. Host specificity and phylogeography of the prochlorophyte Prochloron sp., an obligate symbiont in didemnid ascidians. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:890–899. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bright M, Bulgheresi S. A complex journey: Transmission of microbial symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:218–230. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hirose E, Nakabayashi S. Algal symbionts in the larval tunic lamellae of the colonial ascidian Lissoclinum timorense (Ascidiacea, Didemnidae) Zoolog Sci. 2008;25:1205–1211. doi: 10.2108/zsj.25.1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hirose E, Fukuda T. Vertical transmission of photosymbionts in the colonial ascidian Didemnum molle: The larval tunic prevents symbionts from attaching to the anterior part of larvae. Zoolog Sci. 2006;23:669–674. doi: 10.2108/zsj.23.669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hirose E, Hirose M, Neilan BA. Localization of symbiotic cyanobacteria in the colonial ascidian Trididemnum miniatum (Didemnidae, Ascidiacea) Zoolog Sci. 2006;23:435–442. doi: 10.2108/zsj.23.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Patterson GM, Withers NW. Laboratory cultivation of prochloron, a tryptophan auxotroph. Science. 1982;217:1034–1035. doi: 10.1126/science.217.4564.1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.La Roche J, et al. Independent evolution of the prochlorophyte and green plant chlorophyll a/b light-harvesting proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:15244–15248. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chen M, Hiller RG, Howe CJ, Larkum AW. Unique origin and lateral transfer of prokaryotic chlorophyll-b and chlorophyll-d light-harvesting systems. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:21–28. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Matthijs HCP, van der Staay GWM, Mur LR. Prochlorophytes: the “other” cyanobacteria? In: Bryant DA, editor. The Molecular Biology of Cyanobacteria. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1994. pp. 49–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Partensky F, Garczarek L. The photosynthetic apparatus of chlorophyll b- and d-containing Oxychlorobacteria. In: Larkum AWD, Douglas SE, Raven JA, editors. Photosynthesis in Algae, Advances in Photosynthesis Series. Vol. 14. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer; 2003. pp. 29–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Steglich C, Frankenberg-Dinkel N, Penno S, Hess WR. A green light-absorbing phycoerythrin is present in the high-light-adapted marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus sp. MED4. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1611–1618. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00855.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hess WR, et al. Coexistence of phycoerythrin and a chlorophyll a/b antenna in a marine prokaryote. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:11126–11130. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.11126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.He QF, Dolganov N, Bjorkman O, Grossman AR. The high light-inducible polypeptides in Synechocystis PCC6803. Expression and function in high light. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:306–314. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008686200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kufryk G, et al. Association of small CAB-like proteins (SCPs) of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 with Photosystem II. Photosynth Res. 2008;95:135–145. doi: 10.1007/s11120-007-9244-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Storm P, Hernandez-Prieto MA, Eggink LL, Hoober JK, Funk C. The small CAB-like proteins of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 bind chlorophyll. In vitro pigment reconstitution studies on one-helix light-harvesting-like proteins. Photosynth Res. 2008;98:479–488. doi: 10.1007/s11120-008-9368-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kettler GC, et al. Patterns and implications of gene gain and loss in the evolution of Prochlorococcus. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Badger MR, Hanson D, Price GD. Evolution and diversity of CO2 concentrating mechanisms in cyanobacteria. Funct Plant Biol. 2002;29:161–173. doi: 10.1071/PP01213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fisher CR, Trench RK. In vitro carbon fixation by Prochloron sp. isolated from Diplosoma virens. Biol Bull. 1980;159:636–648. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Goodbody I. The physiology of ascidians. Adv Mar Biol. 1974;12:1–149. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Parry DL. Nitrogen assimilation in the symbiotic marine algae Prochloron spp. Mar Biol. 1985;87:219–222. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Markus JA, Lambert CC. Urea and ammonia excretion by solitary ascidians. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 1983;66:1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kline TC, Lewin RA. Natural 15N/14N abundance as evidence for N2 fixation by Prochloron (Prochlorophyta) endosymbiotic with didemnid ascidians. Symbiosis. 1999;26:193–198. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.White JR, et al. CloVR-Metagenomics: Functional and taxonomic microbial community characterization from metagenomic whole-genome shotgun (WGS) sequences – standard operating procedure, version 1.0. Nat Precedings. 2011 doi: 10.1038/npre.2011.5886.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tatusov RL, et al. The COG database: An updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003;4:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Donia MS, Schmidt EW. Comprehensive Natural Products II Chemistry and Biology. Vol. 2. Oxford: Elsevier; 2010. Cyanobactins – Ubiquitous Cyanobacterial ribosomal peptide metabolites; pp. 539–558. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dionisio-Sese ML, Ishikura M, Maruyama T, Miyachi S. UV-absorbing substances in the tunic of a colonial ascidian protect its symbiont, Prochloron sp., from damage by UV-B radiation. Mar Biol. 1997;128:455–461. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Maruyama T, Hirose E, Ishikura M. Ultraviolet-light-absorbing tunic cells in didemnid ascidians hosting a symbiotic photo-oxygenic prokaryote, Prochloron. Biol Bull. 2003;204:109–113. doi: 10.2307/1543546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Balskus EP, Walsh CT. The genetic and molecular basis for sunscreen biosynthesis in cyanobacteria. Science. 2010;329:1653–1656. doi: 10.1126/science.1193637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Singh SP, Klisch M, Sinha RP, Häder DP. Genome mining of mycosporine-like amino acid (MAA) synthesizing and non-synthesizing cyanobacteria: A bioinformatics study. Genomics. 2010;95:120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mendez-Perez D, Begemann MB, Pfleger BF. A gene encoding a modular synthase is involved in alpha-olefin biosynthesis in Synechococcus sp. PCC7002. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:4264–4267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00467-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Perry GJ, Gillan FT, Johns FB. Lipid composition of a prochlorophyte. J Phycol. 1978;14:369–371. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Schirmer A, Rude MA, Li X, Popova E, del Cardayre SB. Microbial biosynthesis of alkanes. Science. 2010;329:559–562. doi: 10.1126/science.1187936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bode HB, et al. Steroid biosynthesis in prokaryotes: Identification of myxobacterial steroids and cloning of the first bacterial 2,3(S)-oxidosqualene cyclase from the myxobacterium Stigmatella aurantiaca. Mol Microbiol. 2003;47:471–481. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03309.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zabriskie TM, Mayne CL, Ireland CM. Patellazole C: A novel cytotoxic macrolide from Lissoclinum patella. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:7919–7920. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Piel J. Biosynthesis of polyketides by trans-AT polyketide synthases. Nat Prod Rep. 2010;27:996–1047. doi: 10.1039/b816430b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Finn RD, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(Database issue):D211–D222. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fisch KM, et al. Polyketide assembly lines of uncultivated sponge symbionts from structure-based gene targeting. Nat Chem Biol. 2009;5:494–501. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Nguyen T, et al. Exploiting the mosaic structure of trans-acyltransferase polyketide synthases for natural product discovery and pathway dissection. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:225–233. doi: 10.1038/nbt1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Avrani S, Wurtzel O, Sharon I, Sorek R, Lindell D. Genomic island variability facilitates Prochlorococcus-virus coexistence. Nature. 2011;474:604–608. doi: 10.1038/nature10172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Power PM, et al. Genetic characterization of pilin glycosylation and phase variation in Neisseria meningitidis. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49:833–847. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03602.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Udwary DW, et al. Genome sequencing reveals complex secondary metabolome in the marine actinomycete Salinispora tropica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:10376–10381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700962104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Riesenfeld CS, Murray AE, Baker BJ. Characterization of the microbial community and polyketide biosynthetic potential in the palmerolide-producing tunicate Synoicum adareanum. J Nat Prod. 2008;71:1812–1818. doi: 10.1021/np800287n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yooseph S, et al. The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedition: Expanding the universe of protein families. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Batut J, Andersson SG, O'Callaghan D. The evolution of chronic infection strategies in the alpha-proteobacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:933–945. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gruber-Vodicka HR, et al. Paracatenula, an ancient symbiosis between thiotrophic Alphaproteobacteria and catenulid flatworms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:12078–12083. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105347108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hochmuth T, et al. Linking chemical and microbial diversity in marine sponges: Possible role for poribacteria as producers of methyl-branched fatty acids. ChemBioChem. 2010;11:2572–2578. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201000510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Schirmer A, et al. Metagenomic analysis reveals diverse polyketide synthase gene clusters in microorganisms associated with the marine sponge Discodermia dissoluta. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:4840–4849. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.8.4840-4849.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Suen G, et al. An insect herbivore microbiome with high plant biomass-degrading capacity. PLoS Genet. 2010;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001129. pii:e1001129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Miller JR, et al. Aggressive assembly of pyrosequencing reads with mates. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:2818–2824. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Brady A, Salzberg SL. Phymm and PhymmBL: Metagenomic phylogenetic classification with interpolated Markov models. Nat Methods. 2009;6:673–676. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Angiuoli SV, et al. CloVR: A virtual machine for automated and portable sequence analysis from the desktop using cloud computing. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:356. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 20;108(51):20291–20292.

Author Summary

Author Summary

Ascidians are a group of filter-feeding tunicates (commonly called sea squirts), which constitute a major component of the ecology of the ocean floor and which contain numerous small molecules important to pharmaceutical development (1, 2). Like man, ascidians are chordate animals, and they house one of the best-studied cases of metabolic integration in the symbiosis between chordates and a bacterium. Specifically, a family of ascidians known as didemnids house a type of symbiotic bacterium, the cyanobacterium Prochloron didemni, that has never been stably cultivated. We used a suite of genetic analyses and chemical methods to investigate this symbiotic phenomenon between the didemnid ascidian Lissoclinum patella and the cyanobacterium P. didemni (3) (Fig. P1). Through this approach, we unveiled the genomic basis of this symbiosis and discovered a unique set of gene products that might be useful in developing pharmaceuticals and biofuels. We also found a diverse and unexpected suite of cooccurring bacteria that contribute to the chemistry and metabolism of this multipartner symbiosis. Taken together, this work provides a comprehensive overview of the impact of symbiotic bacteria on a ubiquitous group of marine invertebrates that thrives in shallow tropical waters.

Fig. P1.

Fig. P1.

Primary and secondary metabolism in the tunicate microbiome. L. patella (Lower Right) is a colony of individual animals known as zooids that filter bacteria from seawater and consume them. The resulting nitrogen is recycled by the symbiotic cyanobacterium P. didemni (Upper Left). P. didemni also provides organic carbon to the host via photosynthesis. Both P. didemni and diverse other bacteria synthesize natural products (i.e., secondary metabolites) that are present in the holobiont and that have relevance to pharmaceutical development and biofuels.

The P. didemni bacteria were previously shown to provide the animals with critical reduced carbon and nitrogen compounds, enabling the hosts to thrive in nutrient-poor coral reef environments (3). P. didemni also synthesizes toxic secondary metabolites that are pharmaceutical lead compounds and that are the major soluble constituents of the animal (4). P. didemni exchanges biosynthetic genes across its population, providing each animal with a different suite of secondary metabolites.

In an effort to better understand this model symbiosis, we performed an extensive study of the inner microbial flora of the didemnid ascidian L. patella. Animals from several locations were compared by an integrated set of genome-analysis techniques that allowed us to explore the complex association between the animal P. didemni and an extremely diverse set of other bacteria constituting this holobiont (the animal and its symbiotic partners).

The first near-complete genome sequence of P. didemni was obtained from L. patella from Palau. With approximately 6 million base pairs, this is the most complex genome assembly obtained to date from environmental samples. Typically, in symbiotic bacteria, the genome decays so that they can no longer live outside their host. However, in the case of P. didemni, no such streamlining was observed. Instead, we found that the genetic makeup of P. didemni seemingly comprises all metabolic genes present in free-living bacteria. We also found features that help explain its metabolic integration with the host. For example, based on the genome sequence, we determined that P. didemni can recycle the animal's waste nitrogen products. Contrary to expectation, P. didemni does not have the potential to fix nitrogen, and the necessary genes were not found in the ascidians. P. didemni has a complete photosynthetic machinery, providing a wealth of organic carbon compounds to his host. The set of pigments and sunscreen compounds synthesized by P. didemni is particularly well adapted to harvest blue light and to efficiently resist high light and UV stress that characterize shallow waters in which its ascidian host preferentially thrives.

The complete set of metabolic genes, the remarkable photosynthetic apparatus, and the lack of nitrogen fixation persist in all four P. didemni genomes examined in this study. The genomes were remarkably similar to each other. This high level of genetic similarity, combined with the lack of genome streamlining, strongly suggests that Prochloron has a free-living stage in its life cycle and that, during this stage, cells may be transported over long distances, contributing to a homogenization of the population (5).

By comparing the chemical composition of whole host–symbiont assemblages with the gene content of Prochloron genomes, we found that the major holobiont lipids (e.g., fats and cholesterol) are probably derived from P. didemni, including potential biofuels. However, we found that a few rare samples contained extremely potent anticancer lead compounds, patellazoles, which were not produced by P. didemni. Because of this, we reasoned that bacteria other than P. didemni might also contribute to the chemistry and metabolism of the host animal. By further examining the symbiotic microbiome and the ascidian genome of L. patella, we found a rich diversity of bacteria with an unprecedented variety and abundance of biosynthetic genes for natural products, including patellazoles.

These results reveal that L. patella is not merely a simple combination of a photoautotroph (P. didemni), i.e., an organism that carries out photosynthesis, and a filter-feeding animal. Instead, diverse bacteria interact in a complex way to define the rich primary and secondary metabolism of the holobiont. Although they are rare, patellazoles have been found in ascidians from Australia to Fiji during the past 30 years, and therefore, interaction with these other bacteria probably represents a stable association of partners beyond P. didemni. This study provides unique insights into the metabolic integration in a chordate model system and should impact discovery and development of biofuels and pharmaceutical natural products.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the DNA Data Base in Japan (DDBJ), European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), and GenBank (accession nos. AGRF00000000, AFSJ00000000, AFSK00000000, AGGA00000000, AFSJ01000000, and AFSK01000000).

See full research article on page E1423 of www.pnas.org.

Cite this Author Summary as: PNAS 10.1073/pnas.1111712108.

References

  • 1.Monniot C, Monniot F, Laboute P. Coral Reef Ascidians of New Caledonia. Paris: Editions de L'Orstom; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schmidt EW, Donia MS. Life in cellulose houses: Symbiotic bacterial biosynthesis of ascidian drugs and drug leads. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010;21:827–833. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hirose E, Neilan BA, Schmidt EW, Murakami A. Enigmatic life and evolution of Prochloron and related cyanobacteria inhabiting colonial ascidians. In: Gault PM, Marler HJ, editors. Handbook on Cyanobacteria. New York: Nova Science; 2009. pp. 161–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Donia MS, Fricke WF, Ravel J, Schmidt EW. Variation in tropical reef symbiont metagenomes defined by secondary metabolism. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Münchhoff J, et al. Host specificity and phylogeography of the prochlorophyte Prochloron sp., an obligate symbiont in didemnid ascidians. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:890–899. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES