Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Nov 8;21(1):239–242. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1012

Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and survival following breast cancer diagnosis

Yanli Li 1, Theodore M Brasky 2, Jing Nie 1, Christine B Ambrosone 3, Susan E McCann 3, Peter G Shields 4, Maurizio Trevisan 5, Stephen B Edge 6, Jo L Freudenheim 1
PMCID: PMC3253909  NIHMSID: NIHMS337428  PMID: 22068285

Abstract

Background

While there is accumulating evidence that use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) decreases breast cancer risk, little is known about the impact of NSAIDs on survival after breast cancer diagnosis.

Methods

We assessed whether recent, pre-diagnostic NSAID use and lifetime cumulative aspirin use before diagnosis were associated with survival among 1,024 women with incident, primary, invasive breast cancer.

Results

Recent, pre-diagnostic use of aspirin, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen, and lifetime use of aspirin up to diagnosis were not associated with either all-cause mortality or breast cancer specific mortality. Neither dose nor frequency of use was associated with risk. Associations were not different for pre- and post-menopausal women.

Conclusion

In our data, pre-diagnostic NSAID use and lifetime cumulative aspirin use were not associated with breast cancer survival.

Impact

Our findings do not support a role of NSAIDs prior to diagnosis in breast cancer survival.

Introduction

Identification of potential factors affecting breast cancer survival is of great public health importance, as approximately 2.6 million women previously diagnosed with breast cancer are alive in the United States today (1). Relatively consistent evidence suggests that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce breast cancer risk (2). Emerging evidence suggests that NSAIDs might influence cancer prognosis by inducing apoptosis and inhibiting angiogenesis (3). In the present study, we assessed associations of breast cancer survival with NSAID use in the period prior to breast cancer diagnosis and for aspirin use throughout the lifetime up to the time of diagnosis.

Materials and Methods

A total of 1,024 women with incident, primary, histologically confirmed, invasive breast cancer were identified as part of the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) study, a population-based case-control study conducted between 1996 and 2001 in Western New York, as described in Brasky et al. (4).

Information on demographics, medication use, and breast cancer risk factors was collected through in-person interviews and self-administered questionnaires. Included were questions regarding the use of aspirin, ibuprofen, and the analgesic acetaminophen in the 12 – 24 months prior to interview. For the analysis of recent NSAID use, frequency of use was categorized as non-users (0 days/month), infrequent users (≤14 days/month) and regular users (>14 days/month). Intensity of use was categorized as non-users (0 pills/day), low (<2 pills/day) and high intensity (≥2 pills/day). Additionally, participants were asked about their average monthly frequency of aspirin use for each decade of adult life starting at age 21. Cumulative adult lifetime aspirin usage was estimated as the sum of average annual aspirin frequency for each decade of life. These data were categorized into lifetime non-users (0 days/month), irregular users (≤10 days/month), and regular users (>10 days/month) (4).

Vital status of the women with breast cancer was determined through a National Death Index search through December 31, 2006. Survival time was calculated as the number of months from the date of diagnosis until the date of death or December 31, 2006. All-cause mortality was defined as death from any cause, and underlying cause of death was broadly classified as breast cancer, other cancers, cardiovascular diseases and others.

Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusted for age at diagnosis, race, education, body mass index [kg/m2; (BMI)], menopausal status, stage of breast cancer at diagnosis, ER/PR status and use of other NSAIDs, were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality. The proportional hazards assumption was tested and found to hold in all analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided and considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Results

Descriptive characteristics of participants at the time of questionnaire completion are shown in Table 1. Up to censoring date, 160 deaths occurred with a mean survival time of 7.32 ± 1.74 years. The most frequent cause of death was breast cancer (n = 95), followed by cardiovascular disease (n = 22), and other cancers (n = 11).

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of breast cancer cases by vital status, Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) study

Dead as of December 2006 (n = 160) Alive as of December 2006 (n=864)
Mean (SD)
Age (years) 59.71 (12.33) 57.79 (10.97)
Education (years) 12.80 (2.50) 13.60 (2.60)***
Body mass index (kg/m2) 29.66 (6.96) 28.44 (6.35)*
Age at menarche (years) 12.61 (1.66) 12.56 (1.60)
Age at first birth (years) 22.78 (4.82) 23.98 (4.87)**
Age at menopause (years) 47.53 (6.03) 48.48 (5.34)
Number of births 2.59 (1.80) 2.31 (1.69)
Number (%)
Race
 Caucasian 139 (86.88) 799 (92.48)*
 Other 21 (13.13) 65 (7.52)
Menopausal status
 Premenopausal 45 (28.13) 240 (27.78)
 Postmenopausal 115 (71.88) 624 (72.22)
Family history of breast cancer
 No 117 (81.25) 629 (79.22)
 Yes 27 (18.75) 165 (20.78)
Estrogen receptor status
 Negative 69 (43.13) 212 (24.54)***
 Positive 81 (50.63) 602 (69.68)
Unknown/not done 10 (6.25) 50 (5.79)
Progesterone receptor status
 Negative 78 (48.75) 277 (32.06)***
 Positive 71 (44.38) 526 (60.88)
Unknown/not done 11 (6.88) 61 (7.06)
HER2
 Negative 87 (54.38) 540 (62.50)
 Positive 14 (8.75) 48 (5.56)
Unknown/not done 59 (36.88) 276 (31.94)
Stage at diagnosis
 I 46 (28.75) 440 (50.93)***
 IIA 25 (15.63) 187 (21.64)
 IIB 30 (18.75) 74 (8.56)
 IIIA 3 (1.88) 11 (1.27)
 IIIB 6 (3.75) 5 (0.58)
 IV 21 (13.13) 15 (1.74)
 Stage not available 29 (18.13) 132 (15.28)
Underlying cause of death
 Breast cancer 95 (59.38) -
 Other cancer 11 (6.88) -
 Cardiovascular diseases 22 (13.75) -
 Others 32 (20.00) -
*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001.

Associations between NSAID use and overall and breast cancer survival are shown in Table 2. Recent use of ibuprofen was associated with reduced all-cause mortality in univariate analysis (HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48–0.89) and borderline significance after adjustment for potential confounders (HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.50–1.00). None of the NSAIDs was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality (Table 2). Increasing frequency or intensity of use were also not associated with mortality when stratified by menopausal status (data not shown).

Table 2.

Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for associations of NSAID intake and death from all causes and from breast cancer, WEB Study (n=1,024)1

Events (n) Crude HR (95% CI) Adjusted HR (95% CI)2
All cause mortality
Lifetime Aspirin use
 Non-users 33 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Ever-users 120 0.87 (0.59–1.28) 0.82 (0.54–1.24)
Recent Aspirin use
 Non-users 90 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Users 68 1.08 (0.79–1.48) 0.92 (0.65–1.29)
Recent Ibuprofen use
 Non-users 84 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Users 73 0.65 (0.48–0.89) 0.71 (0.50–1.00)
Recent Acetaminophen use
 Non-users 63 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Users 94 0.95 (0.69–1.30) 0.94 (0.67–1.32)
Breast cancer mortality
Lifetime Aspirin use
 Non-users 21 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Ever-users 71 0.81 (0.50–1.32) 0.89 (0.53–1.52)
Recent Aspirin use
 Non-users 58 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Users 37 0.90 (0.60–1.37) 0.91 (0.58–1.41)
Recent Ibuprofen use
 Non-users 42 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Users 53 0.96 (0.64–1.43) 0.86 (0.55–1.34)
Recent Acetaminophen use
 Non-users 36 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Users 59 1.05 (0.69–1.59) 0.96 (0.62–1.49)
1

Breast cancer cases diagnosed at stage 0 were excluded.

2

Adjusted for age at diagnosis, race, education, BMI, menopausal status, stage of breast cancer, ER/PR status and other NSAIDs use.

Discussion

Epidemiologic evidence regarding NSAID use and breast cancer survival is inconsistent. Most studies have focused on post-diagnostic use. In the Iowa Women’s Health Study, ever use of any NSAID after diagnosis was associated with a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality and a non-significant reduction for breast cancer mortality among 591 post-menopausal women with invasive breast cancer (5). Data from the Nurses’ Health Study suggested a reduced risk of breast cancer mortality and all-cause mortality for women reporting aspirin use after breast cancer (6). In contrast, post-diagnosis NSAID use was not associated with all-cause or breast cancer mortality in 3,058 breast cancer cases in Wisconsin (7).

Our study was limited to an examination of pre-diagnostic NSAID use. However examination of the association of pre-diagnosis NSAIDs use and survival after breast cancer diagnosis is also of importance due to the uncertainty about the appropriate timing of NSAIDs use to improve cancer survival (8). Information on both pre and post-diagnostic NSAIDs use is needed to address if there is a window of time when use is effective, if at all. Another limitation of this study is potential misclassification due to dependence on self-report to assess NSAIDs use. However, error in report would not be correlated with outcome in that the assessment was done prospectively. In addition, we did not have information on post-diagnosis treatment.

In conclusion, our findings do not support an association between pre-diagnostic NSAID use and breast cancer specific mortality or all-cause mortality.

Acknowledgments

Grant support

This work was supported in part by grants DAMD-17-03-1-0446 and DAMD-17-96-1-6202 from the US Department of Defense, and NCI RO1CA92040, and P50-AA09802 from the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute.

Footnotes

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • 1.Howlader NNA, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA, Edwards BK. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Takkouche B, Regueira-Mendez C, Etminan M. Breast cancer and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1439–47. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meric JB, Rottey S, Olaussen K, Soria JC, Khayat D, Rixe O, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 as a target for anticancer drug development. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2006;59:51–64. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brasky TM, Bonner MR, Moysich KB, Ambrosone CB, Nie J, Tao MH, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and breast cancer risk in the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21:1503–12. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9579-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Blair CK, Sweeney C, Anderson KE, Folsom AR. NSAID use and survival after breast cancer diagnosis in post-menopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;101:191–7. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9277-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Holmes MD, Chen WY, Li L, Hertzmark E, Spiegelman D, Hankinson SE. Aspirin intake and survival after breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1467–72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wernli KJ, Hampton JM, Trentham-Dietz A, Newcomb PA. Use of antidepressants and NSAIDs in relation to mortality in long-term breast cancer survivors. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 doi: 10.1002/pds.2064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Coghill AE, Newcomb PA, Chia VM, Zheng Y, Wernli KJ, Passarelli MN, et al. Pre-diagnostic NSAID use but not hormone therapy is associated with improved colorectal cancer survival in women. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:763–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES