Skip to main content
Annali di Stomatologia logoLink to Annali di Stomatologia
. 2011 Jul 18;2(1-2):28–31.

Excision of an oral angiolipoma by KTP laser: a case report

Gaspare Palaia 1,, Gianfranco Gaimari 1, Rossella Lo Giudice 1, Alexandros Galanakis 1, Gianluca Tenore 1, Umberto Romeo 1
PMCID: PMC3254385  PMID: 22238720

Summary

Materials and methods

A 66 year old woman was referred to our observation, since the presence of a painless swelling located on the right cheek mucosa. A surgical approach with KTP laser was performed with the mucosal preservation technique.

Results

Follow up after seven days, sixty days and four months did not showed any complication and the histological examination reported the diagnosis of AL.

Discussion

AL is a relatively rare tumor of the head and neck region, although it occurs more commonly in the extremities and the trunk. This tumor has been rarely reported in the oral cavity and when seen in this area, it involves in the lip, cheek, tongue, mandible, and palate. ALs are also intraosseous in the mandible and intramuscular in the pterygoid fossa. KTP laser excision showed to be resolutive and avoid of complications.

Conclusions

AL of the cheek is a very rare patology, but when it appears, it requires a surgical excision.

Keywords: angiolipoma, KTP laser, oral biopsy

Introduction

Lipomas are the most common neoplasms arising from fat tissues. They are usually slow-growing, soft and asymptomatic masses. Angiolipomas represent 6–17% of all lipomas. 13% of all lipomas occur in the head and neck, including cheek, tongue, palate, parotid gland, neck and larynx (1, 2).

When angiolipomas occur in the oral cavity, they require a surgical excision: the treatment can be performed with surgical blade or laser, like KTP (Potassium Titanium Phosphate) laser (1,2,3).

The KTP laser has a wavelength of 532 nm and emits a green visible radiation. Light is produced, as in the Nd:YAG laser, by a solid active material (Yttrium, Aluminium Garnet crystal doped with Neodymium). The resulting radiation is filtered by a system of mirrors of Potassium, Titanium and Phosphate, that halves the initial wavelength. The wavelength of the KTP laser is more strongly absorbed by oxyhaemoglobin than any other wavelength, so lower levels of energy and fluence can be used to cut vascularized tissues (4,5,6).

In this report, the authors present a case of non-infiltrating angiolipoma excised from the cheek with KTP laser.

Case report

A 66 year old woman with no history of systemic diseases, in drug therapy for hypertension, which was referred to our observation, since the presence of swelling three months ago, located on the right cheek mucosa, corresponding to the second premolar and the first molar. The patient reported no pain.

Clinical examination showed a soft, mobile and rilevate mass, of about 2 x 1,5 cm, covered with normal mucosa (Fig. 1). Not ulcerated and necrotic areas were found.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Clinical featuring of the lesion.

Surgery was performed with the mucosal preservation technique. After local anesthesia without adrenaline, because the wavelength of the KTP laser is absorbed by oxyhaemoglobin, the lesion was immobilized and highlighted by Collin clamp. Then, it was performed a longitudinal incision by laser with optical fiber of 300 micron at parameters 2 watt in continuos wave and a fluence of 2830 J/cm2 (Fig. 2). In a second phase, it was possible to separate the lesion from tissue below by Metzenbaum scissors (Fig. 3). Then the lesion was excised at 2 watt in pulsed wave (Ton 100 ms, T-off 100 ms) and a fluence of 283 J/cm2 (Figs 4,5).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Incision by laser KTP, emitting a green visible light.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Dissection of the lesion with Metzenbaum scissors.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Taking the lesion with Kelly clamp, being careful to preserve the oral mucosa was carried to enucleated of the lesion.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Surgical sample.

Finally, resorbable suture point were applied (Fig. 6). This surgical technique was permit to preserve the oral mucosa overlying the tumor providing an excellent soft tissues healing. Follow up after seven days (Fig.7), sixty days (Fig. 8) and four months (Fig. 9) did not showed any complication and the histological examination reported the diagnosis of AL (Fig.10).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Resorbable suture.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Follow up after 7 days, showing the absence of inflammatory process.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Follow up after 60 days, complete recovery.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Follow up after 4 months. There are no scars or signs of recurrence and the surgical site appears to be covered by normotrofic mucosa.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Histological examination (E.E.,10x). The tumor is composed of a diffuse proliferation of mature fat cells mixed with thick fibrous connective tissues containing many small blood vessels.

Discussion

Lipomas represent about 1 to 5% of all neoplasms of the oral cavity (1). They are painless, soft, round and mobile. Angiolipomas, histologic variants of lipoma, are benign mesenchymal tumours made up of mature lipocytes and blood vessels. Multiple lesions are seen in approximately 70–80% of cases. 5% of these cases are familial but the genetic pattern is unclear (2). It has been suggested that the etiology of AL is from a hamartomatous origin. History of trauma, lipomatous differentiation by hormones during puberty, fatty degeneration of a central hemangioma and vascular proliferation of a congenital lipoma (congenital origin) have been reported as possible etiologic factors (1). Hemangioma, leiomyoma, neurilemmoma, myxolipoma and Kaposi’s sarcoma must be considered in differential diagnosis (8,9). Based on studies by Gonzales-Crussi et al. (1,10), angiolipoma has two histologic types: infiltrating and non-infiltrating. Infiltrating ALs have been diagnosed in the head and neck by their invasion of adjacent structures and the difficulty in separating the cancer from surrounding tissues. Other investigators proposed that the differentiation between non infiltrating and infiltrating form was based on the presence of a complete capsule and rare recurrences in the former, and partial or no capsule with recurrences in the latter (7,11). The non-infiltrating type is the most common. It presents as painless or tender subcutaneous nodules, generally in young patients and its rare before puberty (12,13,14,15). Histologically it is encapsulated, and is a mixture of mature adipocytes and a proliferation of thin-walled vascular channels.[12] The diagnosis is based on both the clinical and histologic features (Table 1) (12). Microscopically, AL is characterized by mature adipocytes, interspersed in connective tissues with vascular vessels containing fibrin thrombi and mast cells infiltrations. This features distinct it from usual lipoma (2,13,14,16,17).

Table 1.

Histologic guidelines for diagnosis of non-infiltrating angiolipoma (2).

Evidence of 50% mature adipocytes in the tumour
Interspersed angiomatous proliferation in the tumor
Well encapsulated
Fibrinous microthrombi
Absence of other mesenchymal elements

As differential diagnosis, lipoma, liposarcoma, hemangioma, leiomyoma, neurilemmoma, lymphangioma and Kaposi’s sarcoma can be considered. Lipomas have no predominant vascular component. When CT scan demonstrate the presence of soft tissue or bony infiltration, liposarcoma must be included in the differential diagnosis. Surgical excision is the treatment for both infiltrating and non-infiltrating angiolipomas (1,9,10).

Conclusions

Angiolipomas are rarely seen in the head and neck region. This case report, showed the typical clinical and histological findings of a non-infiltrating angiolipoma.

The advantages of the employment of the KTP laser in oral soft tissue surgery are its high cutting ability, the bloodless operative field, its relative ease and rapidity of use, and the reduced use of infiltrative anaesthesia. The KTP laser is an effective instrument for performing oral soft tissue excision, because of its excellent surgical properties and the almost total lack of thermal damage. However, these indisputable advantages cannot replace the ability and knowledge of the oral surgeon (4).

The KTP laser demonstrated surgical effectiveness and caused little peripheral damage to the cut edges, and therefore would always allow a safe histological diagnosis to be obtained. Complete surgical excision with a clear surgical margin is the treatment of choice to avoid recurrence; KTP laser in this sense represents a very valuable surgical aid.

References

  • 1.Altug Hasan Ayberk, Sahin Sermet, Sencimen Metin, Dogan Necdet, Erdogan Ozgur. Non-infiltrating angiolipoma of the cheek: a case report and review of the literature. J Oral Science. 2009;51(1):137–139. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.51.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bùa J Arenaz, Luaces R, Franco F Lorenzo, Rozado A Garcia, Escudero JL Crespo, Capdevila E Fonseca, Cedrun JL Lopez. Angiolipoma in head and neck: report of two cases and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:610–625. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ida-Yonemochi Hiroko, Swelam Wael, Saito Chikara, Saku Takashi. Angiolipoma of the buccal mucosa: a possible role of mast cell-derived VEGF in its enhanced vascularity. J Oral Pathology Med. 2005;34:59–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2004.00230.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Romeo U, Palaia G, Del Vecchio A, Tenore G, Gambarini G, Gutknecht N, De Luca M. Effects of KTP laser on oral soft tissues. An in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci. 2010;25(4):539–43. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0756-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clark C, Cameron H, Moseley H, Ferguson J, Ibbotson SH. Treatment of superficial cutaneous vascular lesions: experience with the KTP 532 nm laser. Lasers in Medical Science. 2010;19:1–5. doi: 10.1007/s10103-004-0294-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jones T, Fleming C, Llewelyn J. Management of vascular lesions of the mouth and lips using a potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser: review of patient satisfaction. British J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul 29; doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dalambiras S, Tilaveridis I, Iordaninidis S, Zaraboukas T, Epivatianos A. Infiltrating Angiolipoma of a the oral cavity: report of a case and literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:681–683. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hamakawa H, Hino H, Sumida T, Tanioka H. Infiltration angiolipoma of the cheek: a case report and a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58:674–7. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(00)90166-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aniceto GS, Saez RS, Penin AG. Angiolipoma of the cheek: Report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;48:512. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(90)90243-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gonzales-Crussi F, Enneking WF, Arean V. Infiltrating angiolipoma. J Bone Joint Surg. 1966;48:1111–1114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ali MH, El-Zuebi F. Angiolipoma of the cheek: Report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54:213–214. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90450-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Reilly JS, Kelly DR, Royal SA. Angiolipoma of the parotid: case report and review. Laryngoscope. 1988;98:818–821. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198808000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alvi A, Gardner C, Thomas W. Angiolipoma of the head and the neck. J Otolaryngol. 1998;27:100–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lin SC, Wang TY, Hahn IJ. Angiolipoma of the tongue. Report of a case. Ann Dent. 1989;48:37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Flaggert JJ, Heldt LV, Keaton W. Angiolipoma of the palate: report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;61:333–336. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90412-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Saydam L, Bozkurt MK, Ugur MB, Ozcelik T, Kutluay L. Angiolipoma of the neck. a case report. Ear Nose Throat J. 2005;84:375–377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miyazaki H, Hato J, Watanabe H, Harada H, Kazizaki H, Tetsumura A, Sato A, Omura K. Intralesional laser treatment of voluminous vascular lesions in the oral cavity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(2):164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annali di Stomatologia are provided here courtesy of CIC Edizioni Internazionali

RESOURCES