Skip to main content
The Texas Heart Institute Journal logoLink to The Texas Heart Institute Journal
. 1998;25(3):166–169.

Aortic and mitral valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach.

T Klokocovnik 1
PMCID: PMC325543  PMID: 9782554

Abstract

Less invasive approaches to cardiovascular surgery are used increasingly to reduce surgical trauma and shorten hospital stay. The rarely used upper partial sternotomy and parasternal incision can confer the advantages of a smaller surgical wound: reduced blood loss, decreased risk of infection, shorter intubation, earlier discharge, decreased postoperative pain, and a smaller, cosmetically more acceptable postoperative scar. Moreover, reoperation is less hazardous, because the pericardium was not completely dissected. From the beginning of December 1996 to the end of January 1998, a minimally invasive approach was used for aortic valve replacement in 10 patients, and for mitral valve replacement in 2 patients. Patients with coronary artery disease, aneurysm of the ascending aorta, and poor ejection fraction were excluded from the group, but diabetes mellitus, obesity, and impaired pulmonary function were not considered contraindications to the operation. No patients required conversion to full sternotomy or reoperation. There were no wound infections, neurological deficits, or fatalities. The technique has proved safe, effective, and aesthetically acceptable to the patient.

Full text

PDF
166

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arom K. V., Emery R. W. Minimally invasive mitral operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Apr;63(4):1219–1220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benetti F. J., Mariani M. A., Rizzardi J. L., Benetti I. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Apr;113(4):806–807. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70246-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooley D. A. Limited access myocardial revascularization. A preliminary report. Tex Heart Inst J. 1996;23(2):81–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cosgrove D. M., 3rd, Sabik J. F. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Aug;62(2):596–597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Amicis V., Ascione R., Iannelli G., Di Tommaso L., Monaco M., Spampinato N. Aortic valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach. Tex Heart Inst J. 1997;24(4):353–355. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lazzara R. R., Kidwell F. E. Right parasternal incision: a uniform minimally invasive approach for valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Jan;65(1):271–272. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01074-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mitchell M. B., Brown J. M., London M. J. Cardiac entrapment during minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Oct;64(4):1171–1173. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00737-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nair R. U., Sharpe D. A. Limited lower sternotomy for minimally invasive mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Jan;65(1):273–274. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01078-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Navia J. L., Cosgrove D. M., 3rd Minimally invasive mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Nov;62(5):1542–1544. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00779-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Svensson L. G. Minimal-access "J" or "j" sternotomy for valvular, aortic, and coronary operations or reoperations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Nov;64(5):1501–1503. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00927-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tam R. K., Almeida A. A. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via partial sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Jan;65(1):275–276. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01204-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Texas Heart Institute Journal are provided here courtesy of Texas Heart Institute

RESOURCES