Abstract
To investigate the performance of a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteremia, 5-ml aliquots of blood were inoculated into bioMérieux mycobacterial (MB) bottles and incubated, and 5-ml aliquots of blood were extracted and tested by real-time PCR. Of 25 samples from patients with M. tuberculosis bacteremia, 9 (36.0%) were positive and 1 (1.5%) of 66 control samples was positive by NAAT. The NAAT shows promise, but modifications should focus on improving sensitivity.
TEXT
Disseminated tuberculosis is a major health problem in countries where generalized HIV epidemics coincide with high tuberculosis incidence rates, often causing fatal illness in patients with immunologically advanced HIV disease (14). Long recognized (5, 13), Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteremia is common in sub-Saharan Africa (1, 2, 4, 16, 20) and Asia (3, 17). In-hospital case fatality rates are high (1), and median survival is short (1, 17, 19). Early recognition and treatment are likely to be important for averting mortality (12). Even when using mycobacterial blood culture systems with continuous detection, the time to positive may be too long to influence clinical management (7, 9). Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) on whole-blood specimens have shown promise for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (6, 21). We hypothesized that NAAT on whole blood may be useful for the early diagnosis of the disseminated form of tuberculosis.
Samples for blood cultures, NAAT, and other diagnostic tests were collected from patients aged ≥13 years hospitalized at the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC) and Mawenzi Regional Hospital (MRH) in Moshi, Tanzania, from July 2006 through October 2009 (8). Patients with oral temperatures of ≥38.0°C were invited to participate; 5 ml of blood was inoculated into a bioMérieux BacT/Alert MB bottle and 5 ml was inoculated into an EDTA tube for subsequent NAAT. Other study procedures are described elsewhere (7, 8, 10, 15, 23). Only the results of the MB bottle were considered in the classification of cases; a patient with a companion bottle positive for M. tuberculosis was not included in the control group even if the MB bottle was negative.
Blood culture bottles and tubes were assessed for volume adequacy by comparing the weights before and after inoculation. A bottle or tube was considered adequately filled if it contained 4 to 6 ml of blood. Only samples from patients with adequately filled bottles and tubes were included in the study. BacT/Alert MB bottles were loaded into the BacT/Alert 3D automated microbial detection system (bioMérieux Inc., Durham, NC) where they were incubated for up to 42 days.
Specimens were classified as being from a case patient with M. tuberculosis bacteremia if the MB blood culture bottle was positive for M. tuberculosis. Those with mycobacterial blood cultures negative for M. tuberculosis were classified as controls. The results of clinical evaluations and examination of nonblood specimens for mycobacteria were available for evaluation following completion of nucleic acid amplification testing (8).
EDTA-blood was transferred to cryovials and stored at −80°C for up to 5 years. Cryovials were shipped on dry ice to the Cleveland Clinic for nucleic acid amplification testing. Each 5-ml sample was thawed, mixed thoroughly, and transferred into an adult Wampole isolator tube (Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc., Princeton, NJ). Each isolator tube was gently vortexed for 5 to 10 s and held at room temperature for at least 1 h to inactivate HIV, if present (11). Following centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 30 min, a pellet was obtained using the manufacturer's instructions. The 1.5-ml pellet was transferred into a 2-ml Sarstedt microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min. Approximately 1.2 ml of supernatant was removed, and 500 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was added. The suspension was vortexed and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min, and most of the supernatant was removed. A 180-μl volume of MagNA Pure bacteria lysis buffer (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and 20 μl of proteinase K (Roche) were added to each pellet, and the mixture was incubated at 65°C for at least 2 h to overnight. The suspension was heated at 100°C for 10 min. Processing of the pellet was performed using a class II biosafety cabinet and a microcentrifuge with a removable rotor. The entire sample was added to 2 ml of NucliSENS EasyMAG lysis buffer (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) and extracted on the EasyMAG instrument. A final extraction volume of 50 μl was obtained.
PCR was performed using the LightCycler system (Roche) based on a previously described assay (22), with the following modifications. Asymmetric PCR was used by increasing the reverse primer concentration from 0.25 μM to 0.5 μM. Additionally, PCR cycles were increased from 45 to 55, and step mode was selected for melting curve analysis. Positive and negative controls consisted of M. tuberculosis ATCC 27294 and PCR-grade water, respectively. If amplification occurred, then the identity of the Mycobacterium species as M. tuberculosis was confirmed using postamplification melt curve analysis by comparison to the positive control (±2°C). Five 1-ml replicates of each sample were tested. All PCR-negative samples were further tested using the LightCycler control kit DNA (Roche), which is a PCR assay for a 110-bp fragment of the human β-globin gene.
Means and ranges were calculated for continuous data and compared by the paired two-sample t test for means after log transformation was performed to correct for the observed positively skewed (nonparametric) distributions. Proportions were compared using the chi-square test with Yates' correction for small numbers when necessary. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the NAAT compared with blood culture. All analyses were done with the SAS system for Windows (release 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). This study was approved by the KCMC Research Ethics Committee, the Tanzania National Institutes for Medical Research National Research Ethics Coordinating Committee, and an Institutional Review Board of Duke University Medical Center.
Of 91 participants included in the study, 25 (27.5%) had M. tuberculosis bacteremia and were classified as cases. All were HIV infected. The remaining 66 (72.5%) had mycobacterial blood cultures negative for M. tuberculosis and were classified as controls. Characteristics of control participants and samples are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Patient samples with and without M. tuberculosis bacteremia selected for evaluation of the nucleic acid amplification test
Designation | HIV serostatus | Invasive infection category | Bloodstream isolate | n (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Case | Infected | Met study eligibility; M. tuberculosis bloodstream infection | M. tuberculosis | 25 (27.5) |
Control | Infected | Nontuberculous mycobacterial bloodstream infection | Mycobacterium sherrisii (1), Mycobacterium simiae (1) | 2 (2.2) |
Infected | Met study eligibility, blood culture negative | Negative | 13 (14.3) | |
Infected | Nonmycobacterial bloodstream infection | Cryptococcus neoformans (5), Escherichia coli (3), Streptococcus pneumoniae (1) | 9 (9.9) | |
Uninfected | Nonmycobacterial bloodstream infection | E. coli (4), S. pneumoniae (2), Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (16) | 22 (24.2) | |
Uninfected | Blood culture negative | Negative | 20 (22.0) | |
Total | 91 (100) |
Of 25 samples with M. tuberculosis bacteremia, 9 (36.0%) were positive by NAAT. Of those positive by NAAT, the mean number of replicates that were positive was 3 (range, 1 to 5). For those with results available, the mean magnitude of mycobacteremia was 58.1 CFU/ml (range, 17.0 to 90.0) among NAAT-positive samples, compared with 0.5 CFU/ml (mean and range) for NAAT-negative samples (P = 0.157). The mean time to positive in the continuously monitored BacT/Alert MB system was 16.8 days (range, 9.4 to 27.5) for NAAT-positive samples and 22.0 days (range, 11.3 to 30.9) for NAAT-negative samples (P = 0.062) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Nucleic acid amplification test results for samples with M. tuberculosis bloodstream infection by magnitude of mycobacteremiaa
Sample no. | M. tuberculosis nucleic acid result | No. (%) of positive replicates | Cycle threshold(s) for positive replicates | M. tuberculosis CFU/mlb | Time to positive (days)c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | − | − | ND | 19.2 | |
2 | − | − | ND | 11.3 | |
3 | + | 3 (60.0) | 38.6, 38.7, 39.1 | 78.3 | 16.7 |
4 | + | 3 (60.0) | 37.2, 37.9, 37.3 | 47.2 | 20.2 |
5 | − | − | ND | 30.9 | |
6 | − | − | ND | 26.2 | |
7 | + | 5 (100.0) | 37.6, 37.2, 37.6, 38.3, 37.2 | ND | 13.8 |
8 | − | − | ND | NA | |
9 | − | − | ND | NA | |
10 | − | − | Negative | NA | |
11 | − | − | Negative | 21.0 | |
12 | + | 3 (60.0) | 41.4, 40.6, 40.0 | 90.0 | 9.4 |
13 | − | − | Negative | NA | |
14 | − | − | Negative | 29.0 | |
15 | + | 1 (20.0) | 39.6 | ND | 18.8 |
16 | − | − | Negative | NA | |
17 | − | − | 0.5 | 20.0 | |
18 | − | − | ND | 24.8 | |
19 | − | − | Negative | 15.3 | |
20 | − | − | ND | 22.1 | |
21 | + | 1 (20.0) | 39.3 | ND | 17.2 |
22 | − | − | Negative | NA | |
23 | + | 3 (60.0) | 37.8, 38.1, 38.6 | Negative | NA |
24 | + | 5 (100.0) | 36.6, 35.9, 36.1, 36.0, 35.9 | 17.0 | 10.8 |
25 | + | 1 (20.0) | 37.3 | Negative | 27.5 |
ND, not done; NA, not available.
Determined by Wampole Isostat/Isoslator microbial system (Inverness Medical, Princeton, NJ), plated onto Middlebrook 7H10 agar.
Determined from a bioMerieux BacT/Alert mycobacterial (MB) bottle incubated in the bioMerieux BacT/Alert 3D automated microbial detection system.
Of 66 control samples, 1 (1.5%) was positive for M. tuberculosis by NAAT. The sample was positive in 1 of 5 replicates. Evaluation of case report forms showed that this HIV-uninfected participant had clinical features consistent with pulmonary tuberculosis. All 81 PCR-negative samples were β-globin PCR positive, confirming successful specimen DNA extraction and absence of PCR inhibitors.
The sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the NAAT for the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis bacteremia was 0.360 (CI, 0.187 to 0.573), and the specificity was 0.985 (CI, 0.907 to 0.999). The positive predictive value (95% CI) of the NAAT for the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis bacteremia was 0.900 (CI, 0.541 to 0.995), and the negative predictive value was 0.802 (CI, 0.696 to 0.879).
We found that extraction of 5 ml of whole blood followed by real-time PCR targeting of the mycobacterial 16S rRNA gene (22) detected approximately one-third of patients with M. tuberculosis bacteremia diagnosed by culture of an equivalent volume of blood. Specificity exceeded 98% in a control population that included HIV-infected persons enrolled in a country with a high incidence of tuberculosis. There was a trend toward patients with a higher magnitude of mycobacteremia being more likely to have a positive M. tuberculosis NAAT result.
Our NAAT was less sensitive in patients with confirmed M. tuberculosis bacteremia than an IS6110-based assay with patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (6, 21). Possible explanations include that extracting whole blood rather than buffy coat may have increased the effect of blood-associated PCR inhibitors; this may have been compounded by the use of frozen rather than fresh whole blood. Differences in sensitivity may also relate to the nested design of the IS6110-based assay (6, 21) combined with a higher copy number of the IS6110 target compared with the mycobacterial 16S rRNA gene (22). Our assay may perform better in patients with higher magnitudes of mycobacteremia (7).
Despite studying a population with a high seroprevalence of HIV (8) and risk for pulmonary tuberculosis (18), the specificity of our assay was relatively high (6, 21). Efforts to increase the sensitivity of our NAAT may result in the detection of more patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and low-magnitude M. tuberculosis bacteremia not detected by blood culture. Specimens from control patients with a range of bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections were negative in the M. tuberculosis NAAT, confirming the specificity of the assay in the presence of a range of epidemiologically important conditions (20, 22).
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that a NAAT approach could provide a solution to the rapid diagnosis of bacteremic disseminated tuberculosis. Although our assay lacked sensitivity, the potential to detect more than a third of patients with M. tuberculosis bacteremia represents an important step forward in laboratory diagnosis of a condition that is rapidly fatal in a large proportion of patients. We recommend that future work be focused on improving the lower limit of detection of the assay.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by an International Studies on AIDS Associated Co-infections (ISAAC) award, a U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded program (U01 AI062563). We received support from NIH awards ISAAC (J.A.C., A.B.M., H.O.R., B.N.N., and V.P.M.); AIDS International Training and Research Program D43 PA-03-018 (J.A.C., H.O.R., B.N.N., and V.P.M.); the Duke Clinical Trials Unit and Clinical Research Sites U01 AI069484 (J.A.C. and V.P.M.); and the Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology U01 AI067854 (J.A.C.).
We thank Ahaz T. Kulanga for providing administrative support to this study and Pilli M. Chambo, Beata V. Kyara, Beatus A. Massawe, Anna D. Mtei, Godfrey S. Mushi, Lillian E. Ngowi, Flora M. Nkya, and Winfrida H. Shirima for reviewing and enrolling study participants; Gertrude I. Kessy, Janeth U. Kimaro, Bona K. Shirima, and Edward Singo for managing participant follow-up; and Evaline M. Ndosi and Enock J. Kessy for their assistance in data entry.
We are grateful to the leadership, clinicians, and patients of KCMC and MRH for their contributions to this research. We acknowledge the Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health at Duke University for critical infrastructure support for the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre-Duke University Collaboration.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 26 October 2011
REFERENCES
- 1. Archibald LK, den Dulk MO, Pallangyo KJ, Reller LB. 1998. Fatal Mycobacterium tuberculosis bloodstream infections in febrile hospitalized adults in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:290–296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Archibald LK, et al. 2000. A hospital-based prevalence survey of bloodstream infections in febrile patients in Malawi: implications for diagnosis and therapy. J. Infect. Dis. 181:1414–1420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Archibald LK, et al. 1999. Fever and human immunodeficiency virus infection as sentinels for emerging mycobacterial and fungal bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients ≥15 years old, Bangkok. J. Infect. Dis. 180:87–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bell M, et al. 2001. Seasonal variation in the etiology of bloodstream infections in a febrile inpatient population in a developing country. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 5:63–69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Clough MC. 1917. The cultivation of tubercle bacille from the circulation blood in miliary tuberculosis. Am. Rev. Tuberc. 1:598–621 [Google Scholar]
- 6. Condos R, McClune A, Rom WN, Schluger NW. 1996. Peripheral-blood-based PCR assay to identify patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis. Lancet 347:1082–1085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Crump JA, et al. 2011. Controlled comparison of BacT/ALERT MB system, manual MYCO/F LYTIC, and ISOLATOR 10 system for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteremia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:3054–3057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Crump JA, et al. 2011. Invasive bacterial and fungal infections among hospitalized HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected adults and adolescents in northern Tanzania. Clin. Infect. Dis. 52:341–348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Crump JA, Tanner DC, Mirrett S, McKnight CM, Reller LB. 2003. Controlled comparison of BACTEC 13A and MYCO/F LYTIC, BacT/ALERT MB, and ISOLATOR 10 systems for detection of mycobacteremia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1987–1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Crump JA, et al. 2009. Invasive disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria, Tanzania. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15:53–55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hodinka RL, Gilligan PH, Smiley ML. 1988. Survival of human immunodeficiency virus in blood culture systems. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 112:1251–1254 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lewis DK, et al. 2002. Clinical indicators of mycobacteremia in adults admitted to hospital in Blantyre, Malawi. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 6:1067–1074 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Loewenstein E. 1931. Die züchtung der tuberkelbazillen aus dem strömenden blute. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasit. Infekt. Hyg. I Orig. 120:127–129 [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lucas SB, et al. 1993. The mortality and pathology of HIV infection in a West African city. AIDS 7:1569–1579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mayhood MK, et al. 2008. Validation, performance under field conditions, and cost-effectiveness of Capillus HIV-1/HIV-2 and Determine HIV-1/2 rapid human immunodeficiency virus antibody assays using sequential and parallel testing algorithms in Tanzania. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:3946–3951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. McDonald LC, Archibald LK, Nwanyanwu O, Reller LB, Jarvis WR. 2000. Unrecognised Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lancet 355:142–14310675186 [Google Scholar]
- 17. McDonald LC, et al. 1999. Unrecognised Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteraemia among hospital inpatients in less developed countries. Lancet 354:1159–1163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mtei L, et al. 2005. High rates of clinical and subclinical tuberculosis among HIV-infected ambulatory subjects in Tanzania. Clin. Infect. Dis. 40:1500–1507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Munseri PJ, et al. 2011. The bacteremia of disseminated tuberculosis among HIV-infected patients with prolonged fever in Tanzania. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 43:696–701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Reddy EA, Shaw AV, Crump JA. 2010. Community acquired bloodstream infections in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 10:417–432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Schluger NW, Condos R, Lewis S, Rom WN. 1994. Amplification of DNA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from peripheral blood of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Lancet 344:232–233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Shrestha NK, et al. 2003. Detection and differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial Isolates by real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5121–5126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. van Ingen J, et al. 2011. Mycobacterium sherrisii sp. nov.; a slow growing nonchromogenic species. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61:1293–1298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]