Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 23;2(11):1141–1155. doi: 10.3390/nu2111141

Table 1.

Summary of 3-day energy intake record by IBS patients before sample collection a and IBS patients’ body weight measurements. Patient data from samples included in the 1H-NMR study.

Nutrient GDL milk product b Probiotic milk product c
Energy, kJ/(kg body wt) d
  Baseline 31.07 ± 1.57 28.25 ± 1.50
  Post treatment 27.78 ± 1.86 * 24.24 ± 1.25 *
Protein, g/(kg body wt)
  Baseline 1.22 ± 0.08 1.12 ± 0.05
  Post treatment 1.04 ± 0.07 * 0.95 ± 0.04 *
Fat, g/(kg body wt)
  Baseline 1.21 ± 0.09 1.04 ± 0.07
  Post treatment 0.98 ± 0.09 * 0.89 ± 0.05 *
Carbohydrates, g/(kg body wt)
  Baseline 3.62 ± 0.18 3.34 ± 0.19
  Post treatment 3.31 ± 0.23 * 2.89 ± 0.19 *
Calcium, mg/(kg body wt)
  Baseline 16.06 ± 1.19 13.71 ± 1.14
  Post treatment 12.68 ± 1.24 * 10.07 ± 1.00 *
Fiber, g/(kg body wt)
  Baseline 0.31 ± 0.02 0.26 ± 0.01
  Post treatment 0.26 ± 0.03 * 0.21 ± 0.01 *
Weight, kg
  Baseline 73.13 ± 2.58 72.17 ± 2.74
  Post treatment 74.11 ± 2.75 * 72.51 ± 2.74

a Nutritional data are given as mean ± SEM of summed 3-day nutritional intake. Baseline data was obtained 1 day before initiation of the intervention period and post treatment data was collected on the last day of the intervention period. Body weight measurements are given as mean ± SEM. Post treatment means marked with * differ significantly from baseline (P ≤ 0.05);

b n = 28. One patient failed to record nutritional data before collection of the baseline sample and was therefore left out of the analysis;

c n = 29. One patient failed to record nutritional data before collection of the post treatment sample and was therefore left out of the analysis;

d Patient energy intake at baseline and post treatment differed not significantly (P > 0.05) between GDL milk product and probiotic milk product patient groups.