Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 5;2(7):693–724. doi: 10.3390/nu2070693

Table 5.

Intervention with vitamin D analogues (with / without calcium) on BMD.

Study Study design n Sex Mean age (years) Treatment Length Results
CT, controlled trial; F, female; M, male; Cl, Calcitriol; Ac, Alfacalcidol; Ca, Calcium;/d, daily; wkly, weekly;mths, months; yr, year; yrs, years
Vitamin D analogues
Sato et al. 1999 (70) CT 86 M/F 70 40 IU Ac/d 2 yrs Decreased loss of BMD compared to placebo
Ebeling et al. 2001 (72) CT 41 M 57.5 20 IU Cl/d 2 yrs No effect
Gallagher et al. 2001 (73) CT 489 F 72 20 IU Cl/d 2 yrs Increase in spine BMD
Vitamin D analogues with calcium
Sambrook et al. 1993 (111) CT 103 M/F 46 24 IU Cl & 1000 mg Ca/d 1 yr Reduced corticosteroid bone loss in the lumbar spine.
Orimo et al. 1994 (98) CT 80 F 70 40 IU Ac & 300 mg Ca/d 1 yr Increase in lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD in 0.65%
Shikari et al. 1996 (99) CT 113 F 70 30 IU Ac & 300 mg Ca/d 2 yrs Increase in lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD (1.81-2.32%)
Sato et al. 1997 (116) CT 64 M/F 68 40 IU Cl & 300 mg Ca/d 6 mths Improvement in BMD on intact side of stroke subjects
Lambrinoudaki et al. 1999 (118) CT 81 F 31 20 IU Cl & 1200 mg Ca/d 2 yrs Increase in BMD at lumbar spine
Stempfle et al. 1999 (86) CT 132 M/F 50 10 IU Cl & 1000 mg Ca/d 3 yrs No effect
Sambrook et al. 2000 (119) CT 65 M/F 46 20-30 IU Cc & 600 mg Ca/d 2 yrs Reduced bone loss in proximal femur