Is there a relationship between admission blood glucose level following acute poisoning and clinical outcome?

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the admission blood glucose level following acute poisoning, severity of acute poisoning and clinical outcome.

Material and methods

This prospective study was conducted on 345 deliberate self-poisoning patients. Standard demographic and clinical information; admission blood glucose level; poisoning severity score and outcome were recorded. Patients with a history of diabetes mellitus, receipt of pre-sampling intravenous dextrose solution or glucocorticoids, and poisoning with toxic agents which produce hyper- or hypoglycaemia were excluded.

Results

Mean age of the patients was 27.5 ±8.6 years. Females outnumbered males (57.9%). Oral ingestion of more than one drug (46.7%) and opiates (14.2%) were the main causes of poisoning. Blood glucose values ranged from 50 mg/dl to 396 mg/dl. Hyper- and hypoglycaemia were observed in 23.8% and 13.91% respectively. A total of 24.41% and 22.92% of the patients in hyper- and hypoglycaemic groups had grade 3 and 4 severity score in comparison with 4.18% in the normoglycaemic group. Development of complications and death were 14.64% and 10.42% in patients with hyper- and hypoglycaemia versus 3.73% in patients with normoglycaemia. A significant difference between normoglycaemic and hyperglycaemic patients in the severity of poisoning and clinical outcome was observed (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Admission blood glucose levels may have a relationship with the severity of poisoning and clinical outcome following acute poisoning.

Introduction

Hyperglycaemia is a common problem in hospitalized patients with or without a history of diabetes mellitus [1, 2]. The increased requirement of the brain, heart, immune system and other tissues for glucose during stressful situations is associated with alteration in metabolic activity [3]. It has been proposed that stress has major effects on glucose metabolism through the activation and interaction of immunoneuroendocrine systems which result in hyperglycaemia and insulin resistance [4]. The major causes of hyperglycaemia include increased release of stress hormones referring to counter-regulatory hormones (epinephrine, norepinephrine, glucagon, growth hormone, beta-endorphin and cortisol), overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines (especially tumour necrosis factor-α, interleu-kin-1 and -6), iatrogenic factors (administration of steroids, catecholamines and excess dextrose by total parental nutrition) and underlying disease states [5-10]. A growing body of evidence suggests that hyperglycaemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and poor prognostic outcomes in critical illness [11-13].

It is noteworthy that various therapeutic agents have been implicated as diabetogenic factors. These drugs influence glucose metabolism and cause hyperglycaemia through multiple mechanisms of action [14]. Although marked blood glucose levels are generally uncommon with therapeutic doses of most of these medications, higher doses and intoxications are more likely to be accompanied by severe hyperglycaemia. The most common medications are shown in Table I [15-18]. Moreover, one of the reported adverse effects in organophosphate, carbamate and amitraz poisoning is hyperglycaemia [19-21].

Table I.

Drugs which influence blood glucose level and were excluded from this study

Hyperglycaemic drugs	Hypoglycaemic drugs
Calcium channel blockers	Salicylates
Glucocorticoids	β-2 agonists
Hydrochlorothiazide	Acetaminophen
Isoniazid	Non-selective β-blockers
Chlorpromazine	Quinine
β-adrenergic agonists	Quinidine
β-blockers	Captopril
Niacin	Imipramine
Theophylline	Clofibrate
Morphine	Lithium
Amoxapine
Dopamine and its analogues
Organophosphate
Carbamate
Amitraz

On the other hand, several medications may reduce blood glucose levels. These agents are also shown in Table I [14].

Despite extensive clinical investigations about hyperglycaemia in both medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs), to our best knowledge, stress hyperglycaemia due to poisoning has not been described previously. Also we have not found any study on poisoned patients to show the admission blood glucose level with respect to poisoning severity score and outcome especially when medication-induced hyperglycaemia or hypoglycaemia were excluded.

Therefore the purpose of this study was to describe the relationship between admission blood glucose levels with severity of poisoning and clinical outcome following acute poisoning.

Material and methods

This prospective study was conducted in the Department of Poisoning Emergency and Clinical Toxicology of Noor Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (Iran) from March 2005 to May 2005. A total of 345 adult deliberate self-poisoning patients, aged 18 years or over, were included. Exclusion criteria were a history of diabetes mellitus, receipt of presampling intravenous dextrose solution or glucocorticoids, and poisoning with medications or toxic agents which produce hyper- or hypoglycaemia as mentioned in the introduction. The protocol was approved by the bioethics committee of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

Data collection

Demographic and clinical information, including toxic agent, the time elapsed from poisoning until arrival at the emergency department, severity of the poisoning and outcomes were recorded prospectively in a dedicated database.

The clinical severity of poisoning was graded according to the method described by Persson and coworkers, and developed by the International Program on Chemical Safety, the European Community, and the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists (IPCS/EC/EAPCCT). The poisoning severity score (PSS) is a four-scale grading as (0) none, (1) minor, (2) moderate, (3) severe, and (4) fatal [22, 23]. It was determined at the time of initial inquiry and following recovery, using examination findings including the Glasgow coma score, pupil size, convulsion, respiratory rate, pulse rate, blood pressure, body temperature, electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, pain assessment, and laboratory presentations (serum glucose, potassium, sodium, pH, and bicarbonate in arterial blood gases).

All patients received medical treatment under the direction of the hospitals’ consultant physicians. The clinical outcome measures were described as recovery without complications, complications (respiratory, renal and liver failure) and death.

Respiratory failure was diagnosed by monitoring arterial blood gases (ABGs) and chest X-ray. Also patients who were hypoxic in spite of oxygen through nasal cannula received oxygen by mask (5-10 l/min). The indication for intubation was hypoxia unresponsive to supplemental oxygen through nasal cannula or mask. Patients who failed to respond to supplemental oxygen were intubated and ventilated under the direction of critical care physicians. Acute renal failure was defined as serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl. Liver failure was defined as highly elevated serum aminotransferase enzymes (compared to the normal baseline).

Glucose measurements

Blood samples were obtained on admission and if there was hyperglycaemia, subsequent blood samples were taken every 4 hr for 12 hr or more if needed. In cases of hypoglycaemia, glucose level was checked every hour by glucometer until the normal blood glucose levels were obtained. The serum glucose level was measured using the glucose oxidase method on a Technicon RA-1000 Auto Analyzer (Bayer Diagnostics, Ireland). The range of admission blood glucose levels was divided into hypoglycaemic (< 70 mg/dl), normoglycaemic (70-126 mg/dl), and hyperglycaemic (> 126 mg/dl) ranges [24].

Statistical analysis

Glucose values were evaluated as a continuous variable and also as hypoglycaemic, normoglycaemic and hyperglycaemic grades. Statistical analysis was performed by ÷2, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis, and Spearman correlation tests using the SPSS 13.0 software. P < 0.05 was considered as the statistically significant level.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Demographic and clinical characteristics of 345 patients who met the inclusion criteria for the study are presented in Table II. Females outnumbered males and mean age was 27.5 ±8.6 years (range: 18-65 years). Multi-drug abuse was the main cause of poisoning in the studied population (46.7%). Opiates (14.2%) and benzodiazepines (11.9%) were the most frequently used drugs. The majority of cases (50%) were grade 0 PSS (no symptoms or signs) and only 11% and 0.6% were grade 3 and 4, respectively (severe and fatal).

Table II.

Baseline and clinical characteristics of patients

No. of patients	345
Age [year]	27.5 ±8.6
Gender
Female	200 (57.9)
Time elapsed after poisoning [hour]	2.8 ±0.34
Clinical status
Aware	164 (47.5)
Sleepy	67 (19.4)
Stupor	82 (23.8)
Coma	32 (9.3)
Admission blood glucose [mg/dl]	115.9 ±3.9
Severity of poisoning
No symptoms or signs	169 (50)
Mild	78 (22.6)
Moderate	58 (16.8)
Severe	38 (11)
Fatal	2 (0.6)
Outcome
Death	2 (0.6)
Recovery	320 (92.7)
Complications	23 (6.7)
Respiratory failure	13 (3.8)
Renal failure	6 (1.7)
Liver failure	4 (1.2)
Substance (toxins)
Multi-drug	161 (46.7)
Opiates	49 (14.2)
Benzodiazepines	41 (11.9)
Analgesics	23 (6.7)
Antiepileptics	19 (5.5)
Antidepressants	9 (2.6)
Psychoactives	8 (2.3)
Cardiovascular	8 (2.3)
Cannabinoids	7 (2.0)
Corrosives	7 (2.0)
Alcohols	6 (1.7)
Other	7 (2.0)

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM or n (%). Multi-drug poisoning included various combinations of sedative-hypnotic, antidepressant, antipsychotic, analgesic, and antiepileptic drugs

Clinical outcomes

Complete recovery was observed in 92.7% of patients, 6.7% developed complications and 0.6% died. Aspiration pneumonitis was the most frequently observed complication. The PSS was significantly correlated with clinical outcomes (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.371, p < 0.001).

Blood glucose levels

Blood glucose values ranged from 50 mg/dl to 396 mg/dl (mean 115.9 ±3.9 mg/dl). Hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia were observed in 23.8% and 13.91% respectively. In all hyperglycaemic patients, subsequent measurements of blood glucose show a trend to attenuation and normoglycaemia after supportive care. No medications were used to control hyperglycaemia. All patients with hypoglycaemia received infusion of 0.5-1 g/kg of hypertonic dextrose to obtain a normal blood glucose level. The incidence of hypo-, normo- and hyperglycaemic cases in various grades of poisoning and clinical outcomes are shown in Tables III and IV. The correlations of blood glucose levels with other collected data were evaluated. There was no significant correlation using Spearman correlation test between blood glucose level and age (p = 0.13), gender (p = 0.054), time of arrival (p = 0.092) and toxin agent (p = 0.32). A total of 24.41% and 22.92 % of the patients in hyper- and hypoglycaemic groups had grade 3 and 4 severity score in comparison with 4.18% in the normoglycaemic group (Table III). Development of complications and death were 14.64% and 10.42% in patients with hyper- and hypoglycaemia versus 3.73% in patients with normoglycaemia. A significant difference between normoglycaemic and hyperglycaemic patients was observed in the severity of poisoning and clinical outcome (P < 0.001) (Table IV, Figure 1).

Table III.

Admission blood glucose levels in the poisoning severity score groups

Blood glucose [mg/dl]	Poisoning severity scores					Total
	0	1	2	3	4
70-126	130 (60.47)	50 (23.25)	26 (12.10)	9 (4.18)		215 (100)
< 70	7 (14.58)	14 (29.16)	16 (33.34)	11 (22.92)		48 (100)
> 126	32 (39.01)	14 (17.07)	16 (19.51)	18 (21.95)	2 (2.46)	82 (100)

Poisoning severity score was graded as (0) none, (1) minor, (2) moderate, (3) severe, and (4) fatal. Data are expressed as n (%)

Table IV.

Poisoning severity score was graded as (0) none, (1) minor, (2) moderate, (3) severe, and (4) fatal

Blood glucose [mg/dl]	Clinical outcome			Total
	1	2	3
70-126	207 (96.27)	8 (3.73)		215 (100)
< 70	43 (89.58)	5 (10.42)		48 (100)
> 126	70 (85.36)	10 (12.20)	2 (2.44)	82 (100)

Clinical outcome was graded as (1) recovery without complications, (2) recovery with complications, and (3) death. Data are expressed as n (%)

Figure 1.

Correlation between admission blood glucose levels with poisoning severity scores

Poisoning severity score was graded as (0) none, (1) minor, (2) moderate, (3) severe, and (4) fatal. P values are from Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric tests. Thick lines represent the median grade of each group, boxes show the interquartile range and bars represent the maximum and minimum sample values.

* p < 0.001 comparing hyperglycaemic patients (> 126) versus normoglycaemic patients (70-126 mg/dl)

Discussion

In this prospective study, significant differences in the severity of poisoning were observed in the hyperglycaemic patients compared with normoglycaemic patients. The patients with hypo- and hyperglycaemia showed higher grades of PSS. Cases in grade 4 (fatal) were only in the hyperglycaemic group. Adverse clinical outcome (complications and death) was more often present in patients with hyperglycaemia. Evaluation of acute poisoning-induced hyperglycaemia revealed that admission blood glucose levels may be a predictor of hospital morbidity and mortality following acute poisoning.

Demographic and clinical data of the present study showed that young people and females were more vulnerable to self-poisoning. In other studies, suicide has also been mostly dominant in young adults. Gender differences have been reported in some studies and most of the self-poisoned patients have been female [25, 26]. Multi-drug poisoning was found to be the most common type of poisoning. Because most of the patients were admitted within early hours after intoxication, there was no significant correlation between time of poisoning and hyperglycaemia.

Since all medications poisoning by which is known to influence blood glucose levels were excluded from our study, there was no significant correlation between toxin agent and admission blood glucose level. Because of exclusion of diabetic patients and poisoning with hyperglycaemic agents, it may be concluded that hyperglycaemia was induced by stress of poisoning. Attenuation of blood glucose levels in subsequent measurements in hyperglycaemic patients after supportive care also suggests the role of stress in the hyperglycaemic condition in some poisoned patients. Most patients improved completely without complications, and the mortality rate was 0.6%. It is noteworthy that several high-risk patients, who had made a suicide attempt with an antihypertensive medication or some insecticides and pesticides (as a predictor of ICU admission) were excluded from this study because of induction of glucose tolerance disorders [25, 27].

Although poisoning is one of the important causes of significant morbidity and mortality, and appropriate management is very important in critically ill poison patients [28], acute poisoning-induced hyperglycaemia has not been previously studied in these patients. The results of various studies in critically ill patients have shown that stress-induced hyperglycaemia is a strong predictor of increased mortality and adverse clinical outcome [1, 5, 13]. Hyperglycaemia is found to be associated with increased risk of infectious complications and septic shock, reduced immune response, dehydration and electrolyte imbalances and lethal multiple organ failure in traumatic and acute ischaemic events [12, 29, 30].

Some toxicological studies have been performed on medications or toxic agents which influence blood glucose levels. Hyperglycaemia has been related to adverse neurological outcome and brain damage in acute severe carbon monoxide poisoning [31]. In acute aluminium phosphide poisoning, hyperglycaemia as a potential prognostic factor has been correlated with mortality [32]. Hyperglycaemia is also the outcome of acute or chronic exposure to organophosphorus compounds [19]. In overdoses of calcium channel blocker agents, serum glucose concentrations correlate directly with the severity of the calcium channel blocker intoxication [33].

Various clinical investigations in both medical and surgical ICUs have confirmed that maintaining normoglycaemia can improve the prognosis in critical illness [1, 5, 11]. Insulin remains the obvious treatment for hyperglycaemia and lowering blood glucose levels to 80-110 mg/dl has a pivotal role in the treatment of such patients [34]. Prevention of the inflammatory process and insulin resistance may also be important for the improvement of critically ill patients with acute hyperglycaemia [5, 35]. Although the role of treatment of hyperglycaemia with insulin and metformin has been evaluated in critically ill patients in the studies by Goldberg and Mojtahedzadeh, none of these modalities was performed in poisoning cases. A large randomized controlled trial study is necessary to affirm the role of insulin or metformin treatment in admission hyperglycaemia induced by severe poisoning.

Although poisoning cases with toxic agents which produce hypoglycaemia were excluded from our study, hypoglycaemia was also observed in 13.91% of patients. However, there was no relationship between hypoglycaemia and severity of poisoning. We have no explanation for this. Since hypoglycaemia recovered after 0.5-1 g/kg infusion of hypertonic dextrose, the poor nutrition of suicidal patients may be one of the reasons (because of an argument with their family they had not eaten lunch or dinner before the suicide attempt).

In conclusion, acute poisoning-induced hyperglycaemia may be a good predictor of severity of poisoning and clinical outcome. However, further studies for the optimal care of critically poisoned patients with hyperglycaemia and multi-disciplinary approaches to decrease the mortality rate among these patients are needed.

The main limitation of our study is that it was performed in a single medical centre in a non-randomized design and underlying disease states as a risk factor for hyperglycaemia were not considered other than diabetes mellitus.