Abstract
Introduction
Surgical repair of an aortic aneurysm might be complicated by spinal cord injury and paraplegia. Since β-adrenoreceptor agonists showed neuroprotective effects, the study was designed to investigate the effect of clenbuterol on post-aortic clamping paraplegia and to identify if there is hyperemia associated with paraplegia.
Material and methods
Material and methods: Thirty rabbits were divided into two groups: 15 control and 15 experimental (given clenbuterol 9 mg in drinking water 24 h prior to surgery). All the animals were subjected to laparotomy whereas the abdominal aorta was identified. Using a vascular clamp, the abdominal aorta was clamped just distal to the renal arteries. Abdominal aortic blood flow was recorded with a transonic flow meter. The neurological assessment was made according to Tarlov’s Neurological Scale upon recovering from anesthesia. Anal sphincter tonus and bladder sphincter function were also checked.
Results
Four rabbits (2 control and 2 experimental) developed complete paraplegia within 30 min of cross-clamping of the aorta. Of the 13 controls, 77% developed paraplegia, and of the 13 experimental rabbits administered clenbuterol 24 h prior to surgery with 22 min of aortic cross-clamping, 38% developed paraplegia The rabbits which did not develop paraplegia had a minimal increase in aortic blood flow, whereas the rabbits which developed paraplegia had a significant increase in aortic blood flow measurements after aortic decamping.
Conclusions
Post-aortic clamping paraplegia is associated with hyperemia and clenbuterol has a significant neuroprotective effect, obviously by preventing an increase in aortic blood flow following unclamping.
Keywords: aortic clamping, hyperemia, clenbuterol, paraplegia
Introduction
After the surgical repair of an aortic aneurysm, spinal cord injury with paraplegia is among the most devastating and unpredictable complications. The incidence of spinal cord injury as a complication of aortic aneurysm repair is 3.0% to 18.0% [1-6]. Spinal cord injury can occur not only during extensive thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair but also postoperatively, causing delayed-onset paraplegia. Spinal cord ischemia is caused by aortic cross-clamping and interruption of blood flow to the spinal cord via critical intercostal arteries. Basically, various causes of spinal cord ischemia have been suggested, including interference with pelvic blood supply, prolonged aortic cross-clamping, prolonged suprarenal clamping, intraoperative hypotension, thromboembolic phenomena and interference with a low-origin arteria radicularis magna [3]. Moreover, the causation of spinal cord ischemia during abdominal aortic repair is thought to depend on clamping time, reperfusion injury, and hemodynamics [1].
Cerebrospinal fluid drainage, hypothermia, monitoring of somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials, intercostal artery reattachment, distal aortic perfusion, and direct spinal cord cooling have all been used to protect against spinal cord ischemia [7-11]. However, this complication remains unpredictable and unpreventable [12-14].
In reviewing 609 patients who underwent surgical descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, it was found that the extent of segmental artery sacrifice is the most powerful predictor of paraplegia risk [15]. Fasudil has neuroprotective effects against ischemic spinal cord injury in rabbits by reducing the number of infiltrating cells in the ventral horn and prolonging the expression of eNOS [16]. Selective infusion of sivelestat sodium hydrate (ONO-5046) directly into the spinal cord via the lumbar arteries significantly attenuated functional and morphological ischemia-induced spinal cord injury [17]. The mitochondrial K-ATP channel opener diazoxide improves neurological function after spinal cord ischemia and reperfusion by diminishing levels of reactive oxygen species, decreasing DNA oxidative damage, and inhibiting caspase-dependent and -independent apoptotic pathways while preserving mitochondrial structure [18]. Excitatory amino acid neurotoxicity through the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor is no doubt the pathologic hallmark of ischemic and postischemic spinal cord injury. The segmental infusion of noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist as an intraoperative spinoplegia could have a protective effect on the spinal cord neurons against excitotoxic neuronal injury in vivo [19].
Studies suggest that cyclooxygenase contributes to ischemic neuronal damage and that cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors may reduce injury. Intrathecal ketorolac may be of therapeutic potential for preventing spinal cord ischemic injury during thoracoabdominal aortic surgery [20]. The combined use of CSF drainage and naloxone offers significant protection against neurological deficits in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal and thoracic aortic replacement [21]. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α ) is one of the important contributing factors to ischemia-induced spinal cord injury which can induce necrosis and apoptosis of cells [22].
Additional damage to the spinal cord may occur during the reperfusion period [14]. The β2-adrenoreceptor agonist clenbuterol is known to act as a neuroprotective substance in the central nervous system, and also reduces muscle atrophy after denervation. In addition, b-adrenoreceptor agonists provide neuroprotective effects after focal cerebral ischemia in experimental settings, and improve neurological and histological outcomes after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats independently of administration route [23]. Clenbuterol caused substantial enhancement of recovery of locomotor function at severe levels of injury of spinal cord [24]. Clenbuterol (0.01-0.5 mg/kg) reduced the cortical infarct volume in Long-Evans rats as measured 7 days after permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral artery [25].
This study was conducted to investigate the possible protective effect of clenbuterol on post-aortic clamping paraplegia and to identify if there is hyperemia following aortic clamping, and whether this hyperemia has any role in patho-genesis of paraplegia.
Material and methods
Thirty New Zealand rabbits weighing between 4 kg and 6 kg were used for experimentation. The animals were divided into two groups: 15 control and 15 experimental (given clenbuterol 9 mg in drinking water 24 h prior to surgery). All the animals were anesthetized with atropine 0.005 mg/kg subcutaneously followed by ketamine 20 mg/kg intramuscularly and xylazine 3 mg/kg intramuscularly. Abdominal wall fur was clipped pre-operatively to expose the abdomen wall skin. All rabbits were given heparin at the dose of 70 units/kg 5 min prior to surgery. Additional doses of ketamine and xylazine were given during the procedure intravenously as needed and there was no need for endotracheal intubation or mechanical ventilation. All the rabbits were kept on 100% oxygen during the procedure.
Following the preparation of the abdominal skin with Betadine solution, a vertical midline incision measuring 5 cm was made. The abdominal aorta was identified. A transonic flow meter probe (Transonic Systems, Ithaca, NY) was placed 1 cm below the renal arteries and direct blood flow measurements were recorded at the infrarenal aorta before and after aortic clamping (Figure 1). Normal saline was used as an acoustic medium between the aorta and the probe. Flow measurements were continuously recorded using a 1BM386 micro-computer connected to the flow meter in conjunction with the appropriate software program.
Figure 1.
The rabbit as an experimental model is depicted, along with the Transonic Flowmeter probe in situ, positioned for the infrarenal aortic flow measurementt
The principle of the transonic flow meter is dependent upon transit time ultrasound technology (Figure 2). The data processor is shown in Figure 3. The degree of reproducible ischemic injury was established by cross-clamping the infrarenal aorta for 22 min. Using a vascular clamp, the abdominal aorta was clamped just distal to the renal arteries for the specified time interval. Confirmation of aortic occlusion was obtained by a zero reading of the transonic flow meter. Abdominal aortic blood flow was recorded at the time of declamping of the aorta until the blood flow reading peaked and returned to baseline. Following the experiment, the abdominal wall was closed with 3-0 Dexon absorbable sutures for fascial closure and 3-0 silk sutures for skin closure.
Figure 2.
Transit time ultrasound technology (the principle of Transonic Flowmeter). Using wide beam illumination, 2 transducers pass ultrasound signals back and forth, intersecting the flow in upstream and downstream directions. The flowmeter derives a measure of the “transit time” it takes for the waves of ultrasound to travel from one transducer to the other. The difference between the upstream and downstream transit time is the measure of the volume flow
Figure 3.
Transonic Flowmeter data processor
All rabbits were observed for 24 h. The neurological assessment was made according to Tarlov’s Neurological Scale (Table I) upon recovering from anesthesia. Anal sphincter tonus and bladder sphincter function were also checked. All the animals were euthanized at the completion of the study. Animal handling, care and disposal met the guidelines in the Principle of Laboratory Animal Care and Guide for the Care of Laboratory Animals (National Institute of Health Publication No. 86-23, revised 1983).
Table I.
Tarlov’s Neurological Scale
| 0= Paraplegia, no movement of the lower limb |
| 1= Paraplegia, slight movement of the lower limb |
| 2= Good movement of the lower limbs but unable to stand |
| 3= Able to stand, but not able to walk normally |
| 4= Complete recovery |
Results
Assessment of degree of paralysis of the hind limbs was recorded according to Tarlov’s Neurological Scale (Table I). Four rabbits (2 control and 2 experimental) developed complete paraplegia within 30 min of cross-clamping of the aorta. Of the 13 controls, 77% developed paraplegia (Tarlov 0, n = 9; Tarlov 1, n = 1) and 23% did not develop paraplegia (Tarlov 3, n = 1; Tarlov 4, n = 2). Of the 13 experimental rabbits administered clenbuterol 24 h prior to surgery with 22 min of aortic cross-clamping, 38% developed paraplegia (Tarlov 0, n = 3; Tarlov 1, n = 2), and 62% did not develop paraplegia (Tarlov 3, n = 2; Tarlov 4, n = 6) (Figure 4). The mean Tarlov score for the experimental group was 2.461 ±1.761 and for the control group 0.923 ±1.605 (p ‹ 0.05, p value 0.0147). The rabbits which did not develop paraplegia had a minimal increase in aortic blood flow (Figure 5), whereas the rabbits which developed paraplegia had a significant increase in aortic blood flow measurements after aortic declamping (Figure 6).
Figure 4.
Neurological outcome of 22-min infrarenal aortic clamping and declamping. The pie chart above shows the control group (n = 13), in which 77% rabbits developed paraplegia (Tarlov 0 and 1, n = 10). The pie chart below shows the β-agonist (clenbuterol) group. In contrast to the control group, only half as many rabbits (38%) developed paraplegia (Tarlov 0 and 1, n = 5) in this group
Figure 5.
Transonic Flowmeter real-time recording of infrarenal aortic arterial blood flow. Figure 5 A shows baseline aortic blood flow before clamping. Figure 5 B shows aortic blood flow recording after declamping. Note that there is a minimal increase in post-declamping aortic flow. This rabbit showed complete postoperative recovery
Figure 6.
Transonic Flowmeter real-time recording of infrarenal aortic arterial blood flow. Figure 6 A shows baseline aortic blood flow before clamping. Figure 6 B shows aortic blood flow recording after declamping. Note that there is a marked increase in post-declamping aortic blood flow. Experimental animals with this kind of post-declamping hyperperfusion showed complete postoperative paraplegia
Discussion
The aortic flow measurements in the rabbits with paraplegia showed a significant increase in aortic flow following unclamping. Those rabbits with no paraplegia had minimal increase in aortic flow. There is a statistical difference between the control and the experimental group regarding Tarlov’s score. A higher score was found in the experimental group as compared to the control group. It is clear the: 1) hyperemia and increased blood flow after the procedure were evident in animals who showed paraplegia, supporting the view that reperfusion injury might play a role in the pathogenesis of paraplegia and 2) clenbuterol could protect against paraplegia partly by attenuation of post-ischemic hyperemia injury.
The exact mechanism of postoperative paraplegia is not entirely clear. However, variation in aortic flow following unclamping may play a role in development of paraplegia. The studies in this area may be able to help clarify the causes of paraplegia development in thoracoabdominal aortic repairs. The rabbit model is an excellent model because the segmental distribution of spinal cord blood supply is similar to that in man.
A significant increase in lower thoracic spinal cord blood flow in dogs was found compared to the baseline flow after 30 min of thoracic aortic occlusion [26]. In addition, a significantly greater degree of hyperemia was noted in those dogs with neurological deficits compared with that seen in neurologically intact dogs. Other authors have correlated a reduction in spinal cord injury with a reduced hyperemic response during reperfusion [27]. Oxygen free radicals play a role in the ischemia/reperfusion-induced tissue injury by stimulating monocytes to produce TNF-α [28]. On the other hand, a likely mechanism of neuro-degeneration following spinal cord injury involves generation of reactive oxygen species, which overwhelm endogenous antioxidants. In a review of 858 thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs (June 1990-June 2006), it was suggested that paraplegia can result from inadequate postoperative spinal cord perfusion and delayed paraplegia can perhaps be prevented with better hemodynamic and fluid management [7]. Controlled low-pressure perfusion at the beginning of reperfusion can attenuate neurological injury of the spinal cord after transient ischemia, and reperfusion initiated with low-pressure perfusion exerts neuroprotective effects on the spinal cord against ischemia/reperfusion injury [29].
Cerebrospinal fluid IL-8 levels are significantly elevated in thoracoabdominal aortic operation, and persistent elevation of CSF IL-8 levels may be predictive of further development of neurological deficits [30]. Oxidative stress induces cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) activity in neurons after various CNS insults, including global ischemia [31]. The COX-2 inhibitors SC-58125 and NS-398 have been shown to prevent delayed death of hippocampal neurons and to reduce infarct size after global ischemia [32, 33].
The importance of reperfusion injury in spinal cord dysfunction has been suggested, especially as pertains to delayed-onset paraplegia [34, 35]. The prevalence of paraplegia after descending thoracic aorta cross-clamping in a dog model was reduced by administration of the enzymatic antioxidant superoxide dismutase, implicating oxidants as one cause of the injury [36]. Ischemic reperfusion injury of the spinal cord occurs due to temporary interruption of the blood supply to the spinal cord. This may result in irreversible vascular injuries with subsequent paraplegia or other neurological deficits [37]. Oxidative stress with overproduction of reactive oxygen species, such as free radicals and peroxides, is incriminated in neurological vascular injuries [38]. Activated protein C (APC) reduced the ischemia/ reperfusion-induced spinal cord injury by inhibiting neutrophil activation. The therapeutic mechanisms of APC might depend on its inhibitory effect on the production of TNF-α, which is a potent activator of neutrophils [39].
Neuroprotection by clenbuterol has been shown in vivo and in vitro [40-42]. Clenbuterol caused an increase in glutathione reductase activity; this suggests that activation of β2-adrenoreceptors during the acute phase of injury stimulates glutathione-dependent antioxidative processes that lead to reduced oxidative damage and greater locomotor function as the injury evolves during the subacute and chronic phases [43]. It has been found that clenbuterol plays a key role in the cardiac protection against myocardium I/R injury [44]. Moreover, clenbuterol induces nerve growth factor synthesis in cultured hippocampal cells and protects hippocampal neurons against excitotoxic damage. The neuroprotective activity of clenbuterol is also demonstrated in vivo in two rodent models of cerebral ischemia. There is evidence that the neuroprotective activity of clenbuterol is caused by activation of b-adrenergic receptors and the subsequent increased expression of nerve growth factor [45]. In addition, clenbuterol has been shown to have neuroprotective activity after transient forebrain ischemia through increasing nerve growth factor expression [46-48]. Thus, the stimulation of the β2-adrenoreceptor seems to play an important role in activating nerve growth factor against neural damage. Clenbuterol has been shown to spare spinal cord tissue and enhance locomotor recovery in an experimental model of spinal cord contusion injury.
It has been shown that nerve growth factor mediated the neuroprotective effects of the β2-adrenoceptor agonist clenbuterol in vitro and in vivo [41, 49, 50]. The increase in the ratio of Bcl-2 and Bax may contribute to the anti-apoptotic effect of clenbuterol [51]. Clenbuterol has anti-inflammatory and neurotrophic actions and elicits a neuro-protective effect in the kainic acid (KA) model of neurodegeneration [52]. Clenbuterol treatment activated cAMP response element binding protein within retrogradely traced neurons, which has been associated with axonal regrowth. Chondroitinase ABC and clenbuterol can act synergistically to promote recovery of locomotor function [53].
Clenbuterol suppressed LPS-induced expression of the inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6, the inflammatory chemokines RANTES and IP-10, and the co-stimulatory molecules CD40 and ICAM-1. Thus overall, clenbuterol suppresses the innate inflammatory response in rat brain [54]. It was shown that a novel mechanism of action of β2-adrenoceptor agonists and suggested that increased formation of the endogenous glutamate receptor antagonist kynurenic acid could partially contribute to their neuroprotective activity [55].
References
- 1.Szilagyi DE, Hageman JH, Smith R. Spinal cord damage in surgery of the abdominal aorta. Surgery. 1978;83:38–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rosenthal D. Spinal cord ischaemia after abdominal aortic operation: is it preventable? J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:391–9. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70065-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rectenwald JE, Huber TS, Martin TD. Functional outcome after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:640–7. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.119238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Estrera AL, Miller CC, Huynh TT, Porat E, Safi HJ. Neurologic outcome after thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;120:224–9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02971-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Murray MJ, Bower TC, Oliver WC, Werner E, Gloviczki P. Effects of cerebrospinal fluid drainage in patients undergoing thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993;7:266–72. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(93)90003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grabitz K, Sandmann W, Stuhmeier K, et al. The risk of ischemic spinal cord injury in patients undergoing graft replacement for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:230–40. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70267-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Etz CD, Luehr M, Kari FA, et al. Paraplegia after extensive thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: does critical spinal cord ischemia occur postoperatively? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:324–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marsala M, Vanicky I, Galik J, Radonak J, Kundrat I, Marsala J. Panmyelic epidural cooling protects against ischemic spinal cord damage. J Surg Res. 1993;55:21–31. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1993.1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Laschinger JC, Owen J, Rosenbloom M, Cox JL, Kouchoukos NT. Direct noninvasive monitoring of spinal cord motor function during thoracic aortic occlusion (use of motor evoked potentials) J Vasc Surg. 1988;7:161–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Griepp RB, Ergin MA, Galla JD. Looking for the artery of Adamkiewicz (a quest to minimize paraplegia after operations for aneurysms of the descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta) J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:1202–13. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70133-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Safi HJ, Miller CC, Huynh TT. Distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage for thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aortic repair (ten years of organ protection) Ann Surg. 2003;238:372–80. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000086664.90571.7a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lintott P, Hafez HM, Stansby G. Spinal cord complications of thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg. 1998;85:5–15. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00658.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gharagozloo F, Larson J, Dausmann MJ. Spinal cord protection during surgical procedures on the descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta. Chest. 1996;109:799–809. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.3.799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mauney MC, Blackbourne LH, Langenbrug SE. Prevention of spinal cord injury after repair of the thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:245–52. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)00815-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zoli S, Roder F, Etz CD, et al. Predicting the risk of paraplegia after thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1237–44. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Baba H, Tanoue Y, Maeda T, Kobayashi M, Oda S, Tominaga R. Protective effects of cold spinoplegia with fasudil against ischemic spinal cord injury in rabbits. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:445–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Iwamoto S, Higashi A, Ueno T, Goto M, Iguro Y, Sakata R. Protective effect of sivelestat sodium hydrate (ONO-5046) on ischemic spinal cord injury. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;8:606–9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.197244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Roseborough G, Gao D, Chen L, et al. The mitochondrial K-ATP channel opener, diazoxide, prevents ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rabbit spinal cord. Am J Pathol. 2006;168:1443–51. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cho Y, Ueda T, Mori A, Shimizu H, Haga Y, Yozu R. Protective use of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists as a spinoplegia against excitatory amino acid neurotoxicity. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:765–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hsieh YC, Liang WY, Tsai SK, Wong CS. Intrathecal ketorolac pretreatment reduced spinal cord ischemic injury in rats. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1134–9. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000146962.91038.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Acher CW, Wynn MM, Hoch JR, Popic P, Archibald J, Turnipseed WD. Combined use of cerebral spinal fluid drainage and naloxone reduces the risk of paraplegia in thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19:236–46. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(94)70099-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ashkenazi A, Dixit VM. Death receptor: signaling and modulation. Science. 1998;281:1305–8. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5381.1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goyagi T, Kimura T, Nishikawa T, Tobe Y, Masaki Y. Beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists attenuate brain injury after transient focal ischemia in rats. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:658–63. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000228859.95126.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zeman RJ, Feng Y, Peng H, Etlinger JD. Clenbuterol, a beta2-adrenoceptor agonist, improves locomotor and histological outcomes after spinal cord contusion in rats. Exp Neurol. 1999;159:267–73. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1999.7146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Culmsee C, Stumm RK, Schäfer MK, Weihe E, Krieglstein J. Clenbuterol induces growth factor mRNA, activates astrocytes, and protects rat brain tissue against ischemic damage. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;379:33–45. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00452-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Barone GW, Joob AW, Flanagan TL, Dunn CE, Kron IL. The effect of hyperemia on spinal cord function after temporary thoracic aortic occlusion. J Vasc Surg. 1988;8:535–40. doi: 10.1067/mva.1988.avs0080535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rokkas CK, Sundaresan S, Shuman TA. Profound systemic hypothermia protects the spinal cord in a primate model of spinal cord ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106:1024–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schwartz MD, Repine JE, Abraham E. Xanthine oxidase-derived oxygen radicals increase lung cytokine expression in mice subjected to hemorrhagic shock. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1995;12:434–40. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.12.4.7695923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shi E, Jiang X, Kazui T, et al. Controlled low-pressure perfusion at the beginning of reperfusion attenuates neurologic injury after spinal cord ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:942–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kunihara T, Sasaki S, Shiiya N, Miyatake T, Mafune N, Yasuda K. Proinflammatory cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid in repair of thoracoabdominal aorta. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:80180–6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02441-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lacroix S, Rivest S. Effect of acute systemic inflammatory response and cytokines on the transcription of the genes encoding cyclooxygenase enzymes (COX-1 and COX-2) in the rat brain. J Neurochem. 1998;70:452–66. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70020452.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nakayama M, Uchimura K, Zhu RL, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition prevents delayed death of CA1 hippocampal neurons following global ischemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:10954–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nagayama M, Niwa K, Nagayama T, Ross ME, Iadecola C. The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor NS-398 ameliorates ischemic brain injury in wild-type mice but not in mice with deletion of the inducible nitric oxide synthase gene. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19:1213–9. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199911000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wisselink W, Money SR, Crockett DE, et al. Ischemia-reperfusion injury of the spinal cord: protective effect of the hydroxyl radical scavenger dimethylthiourea. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20:444–50. doi: 10.1016/0741-5214(94)90144-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Moore WM, Hollier LH. The influence of severity of spinal cord ischemia in the etiology of delayed-onset paraplegia. Ann Surg. 1991;213:427–32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199105000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lim KH, Connolly M, Rose D, et al. Prevention of reperfusion injury of the ischemic spinal cord: use of recombinant superoxide dismutase. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;42:282–6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62735-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang JY, Shen J, Gao Q. Ischemic postconditioning protects against global cerebral ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury in rats. Stroke. 2008;39:983–90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.499079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xing B, Chen H, Zhang M. Ischemic postconditioning inhibits apoptosis after focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in the rat. Stroke. 2008;39:2362–9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.507939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hirose K, Okajima K, Taoka Y, et al. Activated protein C reduces the ischemia/reperfusion-induced spinal cord injury in rats by inhibiting neutrophil activation. Ann Surg. 2000;232:272–80. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200008000-00018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ordway GA, Gambarana C, Frazer A. Quantitative autoradiography of central beta adrenoceptor subtypes: comparison of the effects of chronic treatment with desipramine or centrally administered l-isoproterenol. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988;247:379–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Semkova I, Schilling M, Henrich-Noack P. Clenbuterol protects mouse cerebral cortex and rat hippocampus from ischemic damage and attenuates glutamate neurotoxicity in cultured hippocampal neurons by induction of NGF. Brain Res. 1996;717:44–54. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01567-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tamura A, Graham DJ, McCulloch J, Teasdale GM. Focal cerebral ischemia in the rat: regional cerebral blood flow determined by [14C]iodoantipyrine autoradiography following middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1981;1:61–8. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1981.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zeman RJ, Peng H, Feng Y, Song H, Liu X, Etlinger JD. Beta2-adrenoreceptor agonist-enhanced recovery of locomotor function after spinal cord injury is glutathione dependent. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23:170–80. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ping L, Xiang J, Zhao L, Yang L, Ben-Rong H, Qin F. Effect of beta2-adrenergic agonist clenbuterol on ischemia/ reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts and cardiomyocyte apoptosis induced by hydrogen peroxide. Acta Pharmacol Sinica. 2008;29:661–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2008.00794.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Semkova I, Schilling M, Henrich Noack P, Rami A, Krieglstein J. Clenbuterol protects mouse cerebral cortex and rat hippocampus from ischemic damage and attenuates glutamate neurotoxicity in cultured hippocampal neurons by induction of NGF. Brain Res. 1996;717:44–54. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01567-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Semkova I, Krieglstein J. Neuroprotection mediated via neurotrophic factors and induction of neurotrophic factors. Brain Res Rev. 1999;30:176–88. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Culmsee C, Junker V, Kremers W, et al. Combination therapy in ischemic stroke: synergistic neuroprotective effects of memantine and clenbuterol. Stroke. 2004;35:1197–202. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000125855.17686.6d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Junker V, Becker A, Huhne R, et al. Stimulation of beta-adrenoceptors activates astrocytes and provides neuroprotection. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002;446:25–36. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)01814-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Culmsee C, Semkova I, Krieglstein J. NGF mediates the neuroprotective effect of the beta2-adrenoceptor agonist clenbuterol in vitro and in vivo: evidence from an NGF-antisense study. Neurochem Int. 1999;35:47–57. doi: 10.1016/s0197-0186(99)00032-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhu Y, Culmsee C, Semkova I, Krieglstein J. Stimulation of beta2-adrenoceptors inhibits apoptosis in rat brain after transient forebrain ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998;18:1032–9. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199809000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhu Y, Prehn J, Culmsee C, Krieglstein J. The beta2-adrenoceptor agonist clenbuterol modulates Bcl-2, Bcl-xl and Bax protein expression following transient forebrain ischemia. Neuroscience. 1999;90:1255–63. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00564-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gleeson LC, Ryan KJ, Griffin EW, Connor TJ, Harkin A. The beta2-adrenoceptor agonist clenbuterol elicits neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory and neurotrophic actions in the kainic acid model of excitotoxicity. Brain Behav Immun. 2010;24:1354–61. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bai F, Peng H, Etlinger JD, Zeman RJ. Partial functional recovery after complete spinal cord transection by combined chondroitinase and clenbuterol treatment. Pflugers Arch. 2010;460:657–66. doi: 10.1007/s00424-010-0852-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.McNamee EN, Griffin EW, Ryan KM. Noradrenaline acting at beta-adrenoceptors induces expression of IL-1beta and its negative regulators IL-1ra and IL-1RII, and drives an overall anti-inflammatory phenotype in rat cortex. Neuropharmacology. 2010;59:37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Luchowska E, Kloc R, Wnuk S, Olajossy B, Wielosz M, Urbanska EM. Clenbuterol enhances the production of kynurenic acid in brain cortical slices and glial cultures. Pharmacol Rep. 2008;60:574–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






