Skip to main content
African Health Sciences logoLink to African Health Sciences
. 2011 Sep;11(3):309–314.

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) experiences associated with snoring in adult Nigerians

OA Sogebi 1, EA Oyewole 1, OO Olusoga-Peters 2
PMCID: PMC3261016  PMID: 22275917

Abstract

Background

Snorers often experience symptoms of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) which is largely undiagnosed in the population. Information on SDB experiences is needed to target high-risk individuals that may benefit from treatment of snoring.

Objective

This study compares the experience of the nighttime and daytime symptoms of SDB of habitual snorers with that of non-habitually snoring adult subjects in a tertiary health facility in Nigeria.

Methods

A cross-sectional, comparative, hospital based study was conducted. Berlin questionnaire was administered to consecutive adult patients (subjects) attending ENT Clinic of OOUTH, Sagamu, Nigeria. Based on the responses to their experience of snoring, the subjects were categorized as habitual snorers or non-habitual snorers. General physical examinations with emphases on the nose, throat and neck were performed on the subjects. The experiences of nighttime and daytime symptoms of SDB were recorded and those of habitual snorers compared to non-habitual snorers.

Results

One hundred and ninety- five subjects participated in the study. M:F =1.3:1. Overall prevalence of snoring was 37.9% and habitual snoring was 18.5%. Habitual snoring was significantly associated with age, marital status and obesity (BMI>=30.0). There were statistically significant increased odds of experiencing the nighttime and daytime symptoms of SDB in habitual snorers compared to non-habitual snorers.

Conclusion

Adults that snore habitually had significantly more nighttime and daytime symptoms of SDB compared to those who do not snore habitually. Habitual snoring predisposes adult subjects to experiencing symptoms of SDB.

Keywords: Adults, Nigerians, sleep disordered breathing, Snoring

Introduction

Snoring is the vibratory sound generated from the upper airway due to partial upper airway obstruction from narrowing that occurs during sleep1. Any narrowing of the upper airway will lead to increased resistance which will require greater respiratory effort to overcome. This generates increased negative intraluminal pressure that encourages further collapse of the airway and vibration of pharyngeal soft tissues1. Habitual snoring is one of the manifestations of sleep disordered breathing2 and obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). The prevalence of snoring in the general adult population has been found to be in the range of 19.3–52.3% 3, while the risk of OSAS ranges between 16.8–33.3% 3,4.

While the tendency to snore is known to run in families5, snoring should not be ignored, nor belittled, since a strong association has been observed between habitual snoring and OSAS with cardiovascular, endocrine, gastrointestinal, neurological and anatomical conditions 68. Furthermore, habitual snoring has been associated with an increased rate of motor vehicle9,10 and occupational accidents11 and reduced sexual satisfaction in men12. Subjects who snore habitually usually display daytime and nighttime symptoms of sleep disordered breathing, especially daytime sleepiness or fatigue and sleep apnoea respectively13.

Studies on sleep disordered breathing experiences, snoring and OSAS have been done since the 1980s and are well characterized in many countries. Despite the alarming health and social implications of SDB among snorers, there is a paucity of studies examining this phenomenon among adults in Nigeria.

This study therefore aims to compare the frequency of the experience of the daytime and nighttime symptoms experienced by habitual snorers with that of non-habitual snoring adults in a tertiary health facility in the suburban town of Sagamu, south-west Nigeria.

Methods

Study design

This is a hospital based, cross-sectional and comparative study among adults attending the Ear, Nose and Throat clinic of Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, OOUTH, Sagamu, Nigeria.

Data collection

The Berlin questionnaire used in this study is a validated instrument for assessing snoring and the risk of development of OSA in the general population. Data were collected by trained resident doctors who administered the questionnaire. was first pretested, modified and corrected. Consecutive adult patients that attended the clinic between February and May 2010 had the questionnaires administered in the presence of their spouses and/ or bedmates as available. The subjects responded to the questions with the assistance or confirmation from their partners. The information obtained included the age, sex, snoring experience, apnoea experience, daytime sleepiness and self-reported history of hypertension. Other information sought included the level of education, marital status, presence of nighttime sleep-related symptoms and daytime symptoms relating to snoring. Physical examination of the nose and throat was done; height, weight, and blood pressure were measured and BMI was calculated.

The subjects were categorized into two groups based on how frequently they snored. The non-habitual snorers group consisted of subjects who never snore or those who snore two times or less in a week, while the habitual snorers snored three times or more in a week.

Ethical clearance was obtained from the OOUTH ethics committee and informed consent was obtained from subjects after explanation of the general terms, usefulness and voluntary nature of participation in the study.

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

All consenting adults were included in the study. Excluded were the patients who did not consent and those who had observed pathologies in the nose and pharynx like mandibular anomalies and tumours that could lead to snoring.

Data analysis

Frequency tables were utilized in the description of the samples while cross-tabulation was done to demonstrate the relationship between variables. Associations between categorical variables were examined by the chi square test while continuous variables were analysed using the Student's t-test. Snoring as an independent predictor of SDB was evaluated by a series of bivariate logistic regression models in which each symptom of SDB was treated as the outcome variable, and snoring status was regarded as the independent predictor. The data obtained were analyzed using the SPSS version 17.

Results

There were one hundred and ninety-five patients who met the inclusion criteria. Among the subjects, 56.4% were males, with the overall sex distribution being Male: Female=1.3:1. The majority of the subjects were in the age range of 30–59 years, with a mean age of 42.5 years for the males and 44.5 years for the females. There was proportionate age distribution among the sexes (t =0.874, p=0.955). Over three-quarter of the subjects (male=78.2%, female=77.6%) had at least secondary school education (X2=5.680, p=0.128). Although 59.5% of the subjects were married, there was significantly more single males (32.7%) compared to the females (20.0%) X2= 25.24, p<0.001. The overall prevalence of snoring was 37.9%, while habitual snoring were 18.5%, as distributed among the sexes (male= 18.2%, female=18.8%, X2=0.334, p=0.846). The pattern of snoring is shown in table 1. The distribution for the BMI showed that 9.1% of the males were obese (BMI>=30.0) while 17.6% of females were obese.

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics of the subjects

Variable Male Female
n=110 (%) n=85 (%) Statistics p
Age range
20–29 25(22.7) 16 (18.8)
30–39 32 (29.1) 20 (23.5) 0.884 0.378
40–49 22 (20.0) 17 (20.0)
50–59 11 (10.0) 13 (15.3)
60–69 7 (6.4) 14 (16.5)
70–79 13 (11.8) 5 (5.9)
Mean 42.6+/−15.9 44.6+/−15.2
Level of Education
No formal education 6 (5.5) 12 (14.1)
Primary 18 (16.4) 10 (11.8)
Secondary 30 (27.3) 27 (31.8) 5.680 0.128
Tertiary 56 (50.9) 36 (42.4)
Marital status
Single 36 (32.7) 17 (20.0)
Married 71 (64.5) 45 (52.9) 25.24 <0.001
Separated/Divorced 1 (0.9) 7 (8.2)
Widow (er) 2 (1.8) 16(18.8)
Snoring pattern
Never or nearly never 70 (63.6) 51 (60.0)
1–2times a week 20 (18.2) 18 (21.2) 0.334 0.846
3–4times a week 12 (10.9) 10 (11.8)
Nearly every day 8 (7.3) 6 (7.1)
BMI Range
15.0–19.9 19 (17.3) 19 (22.4)
20.0–24.9 48 (43.6) 36 (42.4)
25.0–29.9 33 (30.0) 15 (17.6) 0.032 0.975
30.0–34.5 8 (7.3) 13 (15.3)
35.0–39.9 2 (1.8) 2 (2.4)
Mean 24.06+/−4.27 24.09+/−5.03

Table 2 shows statistically significant differences in the age, marital status and BMI of the habitual snorers compared to that of the non-habitual snorers. Table 3 shows the night-time symptoms that were considered. The prevalence of the symptoms was found to be significantly higher in the habitual snorers compared to non-habitual snorers. The prevalence of the daytime symptoms was also found to be significantly more common in the habitual snorers when compared to non-habitual snorers.

Table 2.

Characteristics of non-habitual and habitual snorers

Variable Non-habitual snorer Habitual snorer
(n=159, 81.5%) (n=36, 18.5%) Statistics p
Sex: Male 90 (56.6) 20 (55.6) 0.013 0.909
Age: Mean 41.7+/−15.7 51.3+/−12.7 3.401 0.001
Education: At Least
Secondary 126 (79.2) 23 (63.9) 4.829 0.185
Marital status: Single 52 (32.7) 1 (2.8) 13.363 0.004
BMI: Mean 22.7+/−3.4 30.2+/−4.0 11.530 < 0.001

Table 3.

Nighttime and daytime symptoms experienced by the subjects

Nighttime symptom Non habitual snorer Habitual snorer x2 p
n=159 (%) n=36 (%)
Restlessness 77 (48.2) 27(75.0) 8.33 0.004
Difficulty in breathing 34 (21.4) 17(47.2) 10.15 0.001
Quit breathing during sleep 29 (18.2) 20 (55.6) 21.73 < 0.001
Mouth breathing 37 (23.3) 26(72.2) 32.16 < 0.001
Frequent awakening 30 (18.9) 24 (66.7) 33.49 <0.001
Fatigue after sleep 26 (16.4) 21 (58.3) 28.28 <0.001
Daytime symptoms
Morning headaches 59(37.1) 28(77.8) 19.65 < 0.001
Daytime fatigue 47 (29.6) 27(75.0) 25.74 <0.001
Daytime aggression/irritability 24(15.1) 11(30.6) 4.77 0.029
Poor concentration at work 20(12.6) 18(50.0) 21.20 <0.001
Falling asleep while driving 5 (3.1) 8 (22.2) 17.17 < 0.001

Logistic regression analysis with habitual snoring as a predictor of SDB symptoms is shown in table 4. There were statistically significant increased odds for each of the symptoms in the presence of habitual snoring. For the nighttime symptoms, the highest odds ratio of 18.0(C.I=5.1–63.2) was found in ‘fatigue after sleep’ while for the daytime symptoms, the highest odds ratio of 10.1 (C.I=2.2–45.6) was found for ‘falling asleep or nodding off while driving.’

Table 4.

Habitual snoring as a predictor of sleep disordered breathing symptoms

Nighttime symptoms * Odds ratio 95% Confidence interval p
Restlessness 6.2 1.6–23.5 0.008
Difficulty in breathing 4.6 1.5–14.5 0.009
Quit breathing during sleep 4.3 1.4–12.4 0.008
Mouth breathing 3.8 1.3–11.2 0.015
Frequent awakening 6.3 2.2–18.4 0.001
Fatigue after sleep 18.0 5.1–63.2 <0.001
Daytime symptoms
Morning headaches 8.0 2.8–23.2 < 0.001
Daytime fatigue 7.7 2.7–22.1 < 0.001
Daytime aggression/irritability 7.3 2.3–22.9 0.001
Poor concentration at work 6.9 2.4–19.5 < 0.001
Falling asleep while driving 10.1 2.2–45.6 0.003
*

Odds Ratios are Logistic Regression ORs

Discussion

This study revealed that one in every three adult Nigerian patients snores, and one out of five snores habitually. Habitual snorers had significantly more nighttime and daytime symptoms of SDB compared to non-habitual snorers. Furthermore, habitual snorers have significantly increased odds of SDB symptoms.

The sociodemographic characteristics of the subjects were well matched with the sexes. The study did not reveal any significant difference in the prevalence of habitual snoring between the sexes. However, other studies had reported a male preponderance in the prevalence of snoring14,15. The male predisposition had been attributed to the effect on respiratory control of sex hormones and other gender-related differences in the anatomy and functions of the upper airways 16.

Although a greater proportion of the subjects were married, there were more single males than females. A significant proportion of these singles were non-habitual snorers, possibly because they had no partners who could have detected or corroborated their snoring. There was a gradual and significant increase in the frequency of snoring across the various age-groups, which peaked in the age range of 50–59 years. The fewer number of the elderly reflected the attendance at the clinic which may mirror the demographics in a society with a low average life-expectancy. This finding is similar to that of a previous study conducted in the country15. Other authors had also reported increased tendency to snore with advancing age 14,17. As age advances there is an increased tendency for adipose deposition in the pharyngeal soft tissues that is common in obesity. This study like others, 14,15,17,18 has confirmed the significant association of habitual snoring with increased BMI in this subgroup of subjects.

The overall prevalence of snoring of 37.9% and that of habitual snoring of 18.5% found in this study is marginally higher than the 31.6% and 14.0% respectively that was earlier reported in Nigeria15. This discrepancy may be because this study considered hospital patients attending a specialized clinic and as such the prevalence may be lower in the community. Some studies have shown high prevalences of snoring ranging from 25.6% to 52.3%3,4,19,20 while those of Australia21 (4.8%) and Singapore 14 (6.8%) were relatively low. The differences might be genetic or due to the presence of predisposing factors in the various populations studied. More studies will be needed in these areas to characterize snoring in our environment.

The frequent night-time symptoms experienced in this study were restlessness during sleep, mouth breathing and frequent awakening while the daytime symptoms were morning headaches, daytime sleepiness and fatigue and poor concentration at work. This finding is similar to that found among adults in Sweden with untreated OSAS22. Mouth breathing is usually a consequence of noctural nose congestion which is a strong independent factor for habitual snoring23. Nasal congestion also predisposes to reduced PO2 and increased respiratory drive, leading to restlessness and frequent awakening during sleep, which culminate into inadequate restful sleep 5. The sequalae of these are morning headaches with daytime sleepiness and fatigue. Daytime sleepiness and fatigue leads to poor concentration at work and patients may be a danger to themselves or others, especially while driving.

This study, like a previous one15 has shown that habitual snorers experience more night and daytime symptoms than non-habitual snorers. This observation has also been made in children and adolescents 2427 and is a pointer that SDB occurs in all ages. In addition there were statistically significant increased odds of experiencing the night-time and daytime symptoms in subjects who snore habitually. It is noteworthy that some of the non-habitual snorers also experienced some SDB symptoms such as quitting breathing, mouth breathing and restlessness, since there is no full-proof information that non-snoring subjects do not experience some SDB symptoms occasionally. It is instructive that frequent experiences of SBD symptoms and habitual snoring among adults should arouse a suspicion of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome18 which warrants further investigations. Every snorer ideally should have at least a flexible naso-pharyngolaryngoscopy and an overnight polysomnography.

A significant limitation of this study is the lack of a sleep study laboratory to objectively assess the sleep experiences, as some reports have shown there is discrepancy between reports of snoring and presence of OSAS. The study was also hospital-based with a small sample size, and findings may not be generalisable for the whole population. It was also not possible to detect the direction of causality in a cross-sectional survey. Despite the limitations however, this study has been able to provide template data on SDB experiences in an adult Nigerian subgroup of patients on which further research may be built.

Conclusion

This study show that the prevalence of habitual snoring in adult patients in Nigeria is comparable to those found in other continents, and that SDB experiences are significantly more common among adult habitual snorers compared to non-habitual snorers.

References

  • 1.Croft CB, Pringle MB. Scott-Brown's Otolaryngology. 6th ed. Great Britain: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997. Snoring and sleep apnoea. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Section on Pediatrics pulmonology, author. Subcommittee on Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. American Academy of Pediatrics, Clinical Practice guidelines: diagnosis and management of childhood obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Pediatrics. 2002;109:704–712. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.4.704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khassawneh B, Ghazzawi M, Khader Y, et al. Symptoms and risk of obstructive sleep apnea in primary care patients in Jordan. Sleep Breath. 2009;13(3):227–232. doi: 10.1007/s11325-008-0240-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.BaHammam AS, Alrajeh MS, Al-Jahdali HH, BinSaeed AA. Prevalence of symptoms and risk of sleep apnea in middle-aged Saudi males in primary care. Saudi Med J. 2008;29(3):423–426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lam JC, Sharma SK, Lam B. Obstructive sleep apnoea: definitions, epidemiology & natural history. Indian J Med Res. 2010;131:165–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hirshkowitz M. The clinical consequences of obstructive sleep apnea and associated excessive sleepiness. J Fam Pract. 2008;57(8 Suppl):S9–S16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ulualp SO. Snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Med Clin North Am. 2010;94(5):1047–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2010.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jarvis S, Rees PJ. Snoring, not just a social nuisance. Int J Clin Pract. 2003;57(9):788–791. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rakel RE. Clinical and societal consequences of obstructive sleep apnoea and excessive daytime sleepiness. Postgrad Med. 2009;121:86–95. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2009.01.1957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Torzsa P, Keszei A, Kalabay L, et al. Socio-demographic characteristics, health behaviour, co-morbidity and accidents in snorers: a population survey. Sleep Breath. 2010 Nov 14; doi: 10.1007/s11325-010-0442-4. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lindberg E, Carter N, Gislason T, Janson C. Role of snoring and daytime sleepiness in occupational accidents. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:2031–2035. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.11.2102028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hanak V, Jacobson DJ, McGree ME, et al. Snoring as a risk factor for sexual dysfunction in community men. J Sex Med. 2008;5(4):898–908. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00706.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gottlieb DJ, Yao Q, Redline S, Ali T, Mahowald MW. Does snoring predict sleepiness independently of apnea and hypopnea frequency? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:1512–1517. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.4.9911073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Khoo SM, Tan WC, Ng TP, Ho CH. Risk factors associated with habitual snoring and sleep-disordered breathing in a multi-ethnic Asian population: a population-based study. Respiratory Medicine. 2004;98:557–566. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adewole OO, Adeyemo H, Ayeni F, et al. Prevalence and correlates of snoring among adults in Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2008;8(2):108–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jordan AS, McEvoy RD. Gender differences in sleep apnea: epidemiology, clinical presentation and pathogenic mechanisms. Sleep Med rev. 2003;7:377–389. doi: 10.1053/smrv.2002.0260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tishler PV, Larkin EK, Schluchter MD, Redline S. Incidence of sleep-disordered breathing in an urban adult population: the relative importance of risk factors in the development of sleep-disordered breathing. JAMA. 2003;289(17):2230–2237. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.17.2230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kapsimalis F, Kryger M. Sleep breathing disorders in the U.S. female population. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009;18(8):1211–1219. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ullmer E, Solèr M. From simple snoring to sleep apnea syndrome—clinical spectrum. Ther Umsch. 2000;57(7):430–434. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930.57.7.430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kurukahvecioglu S, Firat H, Ardic S. Evaluation of upper airway in obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome and habitual snorers. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2009;110(8):486–489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marshall NS, Bartlett DJ, Matharu KS, Williams A, Grunstein RR. Prevalence of treatment choices for snoring and sleep apnea in an Australian population. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007;3(7):695–699. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Broström A, Johansson P, Strömberg A, Albers J, Mårtensson J, Svanborg E. Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome—patients' perceptions of their sleep and its effects on their life situation. J Adv Nurs. 2007;57(3):318–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04110.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Young T, Finn L, Palta M. Chronic nasal congestion at night is a risk factor for snoring in a population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(12):1514–1519. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.12.1514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shin C, Joo S, Kim J, Kim T. Prevalence and correlates of habitual snoring in high school students. Chest. 2003;124:1709–1715. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.5.1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Umana AN, Anah MU, Udonwa NE, et al. Pattern of Snoring among School children in Calabar, Nigeria. NMP. 2007;51:103–106. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ersu R, Arman AR, Save D, et al. Prevalence of snoring and symptoms of sleep disordered breathing in primary school children in Istanbul. Chest. 2004;126:19–24. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sogut A, Yilmaz O, Dinc G, Yuksel H. Prevalence of habitual snoring and symptoms of sleep related- disordered breathing in adolescents. International journal of Pediatric Otolaryngology. 2009:1769–1773. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Makerere University Medical School

RESOURCES