Abstract
Natural disasters are tragic incidents originating from atmospheric, geologic and hydrologic changes. In recent decades, millions of people have been killed by natural disasters, resulting in economic damages.
Natural and complex disasters dramatically increase the mortality and morbidity due to communicable diseases. The major causes of communicable disease in disasters are categorized into four sections: Infections due to contaminated food and water, respiratory infections, vector and insect-borne diseases, and infections due to wounds and injuries. With appropriate intervention, high morbidity and mortality resulting from communicable diseases can be avoided to a great deal.
This review article tries to provide the best recommendations for planning and preparing to prevent communicable disease after disaster in two phases: before disaster and after disaster.
KEYWORDS: Natural Disasters, Communicable Diseases, Prevention
Disasters can be seen as sudden and terrible events causing great damage, loss or destruction. Disasters have been defined as ecologic troubles or severe and high-magnitude emergencies resulting in deaths, injuries, illnesses, and profound damages that cannot be successfully managed using ordinary procedures or resources and require external support.1 Disasters include earthquakes, floods, volcanic eruptions, tsunamis, drought and landslides. These disasters may begin acutely or insidiously with dramatic health, social, and economic sequels.2 In recent decades, millions of people have been killed by natural disasters, adversely influenced the lives of more than one billion people, and caused significant economic compensations. Due to the latest report of International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Society in the last decade (1999-2008), over 7100 disasters happened in the world that caused 1,243,480 deaths and over one billion US dollars damage.3 In 2005, 246 (42%) out of 650 severe natural hazard events recorded globally occurred in Asia killing over 97,000 (90% of the global total of 110,000 individuals) and affecting more than 150 million people. In 2006, 174 disasters affected 28 million people in Asia and the Pacific.
In 2008, from top 10 countries with the highest amount of disaster-related deaths in the world, 9 of them were in Asia. In fact, it is estimated the average $39.5 billion physical losses from disasters throughout Asia annually.4 Terrific earthquake in Marmara region in Turkey that caused more than 17,000 deaths in 1999 or the devastating flood in Central Europe occurred in 2002, resulted in economic damages estimated more than $15 billion are only some examples.5
The Bam earthquake was the most catastrophic event in the last decade in Iran. On 26 December 2003, a tragic earthquake measured 5.6 on the Richter scale, struck the ancient and agricultural city of Bam in the south-east of Iran. In this devastating event more than 30,000 people were killed, around 80 percent of the houses in the area were ruined and more than 100,000 became homeless.6
Natural and complex disasters such as earthquakes dramatically increase the mortality and morbidity resulting from communicable diseases.7 Although the epidemics of infectious diseases after the natural disaster are rare,8–10 63% of the morbidity among Nicaraguan refugees in Costa Rica in 1989 was due to acute respiratory infections.11 In 1993, acute respiratory infections caused 30% of deaths in dwellers of Kabul, Afghanistan and 23% of deaths in unsettled people.12 In addition, after the earthquakes in El Salvador in 2001, 30% of infections were upper respiratory infections.13,14 The top five causes of death in emergencies and disasters include diarrhea, acute respiratory infection, measles, malnutrition and, in endemic zones, malaria.15 With appropriate intervention, high morbidity and mortality resulting from communicable diseases can be avoided to a great deal.16
Communicable disease after disaster
The major causes of communicable disease in disasters can be categorized into four areas: Infections due to contaminated food and water, respiratory infections, vector and insectborne diseases, and infections due to wounds and injuries.17 The most common causes of morbidity and mortality in this situation are diarrheal disease and acute respiratory infections.18
-
■
Waterborne diseases:
-
■
Diseases associated with crowding: Acute respiratory infections (ARI) as the main cause of morbidity and mortality among unsettled people are seen predominantly in children less than 5 years old.2 Furthermore, meningitis and measles are transmitted from person to person, especially in crowded circumstances.29
-
■
Vector-borne diseases: Malaria, cutaneous leishmaniasis30 and rabies17 are transmitted by vectors. In 1991, an earthquake in Costa Rica's Atlantic region was accompanied with1a high increase in malaria cases.31 Furthermore, intermittent flooding associated with El Niño–Southern Oscillation has been correlated with malaria epidemics in Peru.32
-
■
Infections due to wounds and injuries: The potentially significant threats to persons suffering a wound are tetanus, staphylococci and streptococci.33
This review article tries to provide the best recommendations for planning and preparing to prevent communicable disease after disaster in two phases: before disaster and after disaster.
Strategies for prevention of communicable disease
Before Disaster
The first phase of disaster policy making is to clarify our needs. For primary prevention, the most important risk factors of communicable diseases should be determined. The most significant risk factors in disasters are population movement and displacement.2 Additionally, overpopulation, economic and environmental devastation, poverty, lack of sanitary water, poor waste management, lack of shelter, malnutrition as a consequence of food shortages, and poor access to health care cause a dramatic increase in the rates of communicable diseases after disaster.16,34–37
Furthermore the breakdown or overwhelming of public health organizations and deficiency of health services obstruct prevention and control programs.38 With emphasizing on these risk factors, preparing and policy making before disasters are a critical need. The response to the disaster is a multifaceted operation requiring persistent review and modification of preparedness missions at the local, nationwide, and global level.39
The Aim of this phase is to decrease vulnerability to communicable diseases through reducing causalities and exposure to risk factors that provide passive protection during disaster. It needs some national regulations that reduce hazard exposure through constructing evidence-based guidelines for protecting individuals.40 Emergency response plans before disasters should include training in identifying and management of specific potentially threatening diseases; preparing needed equipment, supplies and materials, making local backups of supplies and tools for diagnosis and treatment, and environmental health measures for disease outbreaks.
Furthermore, reinforcement of health-surveillance systems and practicing guidelines for managing information on specific diseases; increasing the awareness of potentially affected population about communicable diseases and the prerequisites for quick referral to a health facility are critical.15,40–42 Prepositioning of emergency supplies is one mechanism of increasing preparedness for natural disasters.43 Additionally, in countries with potential threat of disasters, providing fully operational field hospitals providing effective and efficient health care services to the damaged people in the probable forthcoming disasters, seems critical; this plan has an important role to reduce mortality and morbidity of communicable diseases.44 Such strategies are significantly facilitated by continuing support of government, academic and private organizations in terms of assigning programs designed to offer up-to-date education and training.
Post disaster Phase
In this phase, the emergency response for controlling communicable disease includes: Emergency medical care, provision of shelter and site planning, water and sanitation, safe food preparation, nutrition, case management, medical supplies and vector control. Moreover, health education and providing the health of humanitarian workers is a critical point.
• Select and plan sites
providing appropriate shelters and site planning at the start of an emergency can decrease the incidence of communicable disease especially diarrheal diseases, acute respiratory infections, meningitis, tuberculosis, measles and vector-borne diseases.47 Shelters should have sufficient space according to the needs of victims. Furthermore, access to the water, fuel, and transport, solid waste management, and safety of food stores are essential.16,48 The new methods of GIS (Geographic Information System) application is useful for finding the proper place for shelter settlement.49
• Ensure adequate water and sanitation facilities.
As mentioned before, water borne diseases are a main cause of communicable disease after disaster. Ensuring constant delivery of safe drinking-water is the major preventive measure to be applied after a natural disaster.
According to WHO guidelines, Chlorine is broadly obtainable, low-cost, easily used and effective against almost all waterborne pathogens.15 The sphere project proposes the following minimum standards for the water supply in disasters: (1) sufficient access to safe water, (2) water quality should be maintained based on international guidelines, and (3) water consumption facilities and goods should be safe. People should have sufficient facilities and provisions to collect, save and use adequate quantities of water for drinking, cooking and personal hygiene, and to certify that drinking water remains safe until consumption.45,50–52
Additionally, personal hygiene is an important issue in health promotion during disasters. Personal hygiene habits will influence the general health status of the population. The importance of soap and hand washing as a protection against fecal-oral disease should be emphasized in educational programs. Soap and water should be provided to all disaster victims and rescue personnel.53–55
• Ensure safety of food:
Food safety is crucial for disease prevention in natural disasters. The World Health Organization recommends five keys for ensuring the safety of food supplements following a disaster event;
Key 1: Preserve clean - (prevents the growth and spread of hazardous microorganisms)
Key 2: Separate cooked and raw food (microorganisms transfer prevention)
Key 3: Cook thoroughly (kills dangerous microorganisms)
Key 4: Preserve food at harmless temperatures (microorganisms growth prevention)
Key 5: Consuming safe water and raw materials (contamination prevention)56
• Control vectors
Natural disasters can influence transmission of vector-borne disease. The crowding of infected and vulnerable hosts, a debilitated public health infrastructure and disruptions of ongoing control processes are entirely risk factors for transmission of vector-borne disease.57 Major diseases frequently spread by vectors are malaria, dengue, Japanese encephalitis, yellow fever, typhus, and trypanosomiasis. For prevention, vector control interventions based on the local context and epidemiology of diseases are essential. Examples of some useful interventions are indoor residual spraying for malaria, insecticide-treated nets, and traps for tsetse flies as the vectors of trypanosomiasis.58
• Implement vaccination campaigns (e.g. measles)
Campaigns for measles immunization are one of the most cost-effective interventions in public health.16 Mass measles immunization, as well as vitamin A supplementation is an immediate health priority after natural disasters in regions with poor coverage levels. Mass immunization should be fulfilled as soon as possible in areas with baseline coverage rates below 90% among individuals under 15 years old.
Furthermore, immediate provision of Tetanus Diphtheria (TD) vaccine and tetanus antitoxin to persons injured during the earthquake and those undergoing emergency surgeries, is essential.59
• Provide essential clinical services
Access to the primary care services is critical to prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of a variety of diseases, as well as providing secondary and tertiary care.60 Effective diagnosis and treatment of communicable diseases, prevents excess mortality and morbidity.61
Furthermore, standardized guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of the most common infectious diseases are needed. The Inter-agency Emergency Health Kit 2006 (IEHK 2006) which is designed by world health organization to meet the initial primary health care needs of a displaced population is useful in disaster scene. It can be set in immediate aftermath of a natural disaster or during an emergency and includes essential medicines, medical facilities and also clinical protocols needed in the context of emergency situations.62
• Provide basic laboratory facilities
Establishing a clinical laboratory is not a priority during the initial phase of most disasters. The diagnosis of most common communicable diseases can usually be done by clinical diagnosis. Laboratory testing is remained useful for confirming during a supposed epidemic event for which mass immunization may be indicated (e.g. meningococcal meningitis) or where culture and antibiotic sensitivity testing is effective in clinical decisions (e.g. dysentery).63
Consclusion
An important key to diminish adverse health effects due to natural disasters is a multidisciplinary approach with a wide range of proficiency which is useful in prevention and also immediate treatment of communicable diseases.
The establishment, implementation, and continuous monitoring of minimum standards for water safety security, sanitation, shelter, and personal hygiene is critical for health promotion after disasters. Awareness of the emergence of water and food born disease is of importance to the health of the victims. Furthermore by establishment of a surveillance system and monitoring the trend of disease carefully, the threat of outbreaks will be assessed. In addition, some strategic guidelines for controlling outbreaks are needed.
This approach needs extensive continuing preparation, planning, education and also policy development. The ultimate goal is better awareness and response for natural disaster or other complex emergency circumstances to minimize the morbidity and mortality of such ominous events.
Author's Contributions
NJ conceived and designed the experiment. NJ, AS, MM and AL developed the review protocol. AS and MM conducted the literature review and did the initial screening based on titles and abstracts. Data extraction and quality appraisal was conducted by either NJ and AS or MM and AL. The first draft of the paper was produced by NJ and AL, with subsequent drafts developed by all four authors. All authors have read and approved the manuscript
Footnotes
Conflict of Interests Authors have no conflict of interests.
References
- 1.Landesman LY. Public Health Management of Disasters: The Practice Guide. 2nd ed. Washington: American Public Health Association; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Watson JT, Gayer M, Connolly MA. Epidemics after natural disasters. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(1):1–5. doi: 10.3201/eid1301.060779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies . World disasters report, 2009: focus on early warning, early action. [Online] 2009. [cited 2009]. Available from:URL: http://www.ifrc.org/publicat/wdr2009 .
- 4.Asian Development Bank. Disaster Risk Management. 2011. [cited 2011]. Online.2011 Available from:URL: http://www.adb.org/Disaster/default.asp .
- 5.Pusch C. Disaster Risk Management. [Online] 2004. [cited 2004]. Available from:URL: http://www.worldbank.org/hazards .
- 6.National Report of the Islamic Republic of Iran on Disaster Reduction. [Online] 2004. [cited 2004]. Available from:URL: http://www.unisdr.org/eng/mdgs-drr/national-reports/Iran-report.pdf .
- 7.Toole MJ. Communicable disease epidemiology following disasters. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(4):418–20. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82662-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lim JH, Yoon D, Jung G, Joo KW, Lee HC. Medical needs of tsunami disaster refugee camps. Fam Med. 2005;37(6):422–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shultz JM, Russell J, Espinel Z. Epidemiology of tropical cyclones: the dynamics of disaster, disease, and development. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27:21–35. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxi011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Blake P. Communicable Disease Control. Public Health Consequences of Disasters Atlanta. Centers for Disease Control. 1989 [Google Scholar]
- 11.Diaz T, Achi R. Infectious diseases in a Nicaraguan refugee camp in Costa Rica. Trop Doct. 1989;19(1):14–7. doi: 10.1177/004947558901900105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gessner M, Chauvet E. Importance of stream microfungi in controlling breakdown rates of leaf litter. Ecology. 1994;75(6):1807–17. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Woersching JC, Snyder AE. Earthquakes in El Salvador: a descriptive study of health concerns in a rural community and the clinical implications, part I. Disaster Manag Response. 2003;1(4):105–9. doi: 10.1016/s1540-2487(03)00049-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Woersching J, Snyder A. Earthquakes in El Salvador: A descriptive study of health concerns in a rural community and the clinical implications: Part III--Mental health and psychosocial effects. Disaster management & response: DMR: an official publication of the Emergency Nurses Association. 2004;2(2):40. doi: 10.1016/j.dmr.2004.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wisner B, Adams J. Environmental health in emergencies and disasters: a practical guide. Genea: World Health Organization; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Connolly MA, Gayer M, Ryan MJ, Salama P, Spiegel P, Heymann DL. Communicable diseases in complex emergencies: impact and challenges. Lancet. 2004;364(9449):1974–83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17481-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ligon BL. Infectious diseases that pose specific challenges after natural disasters: a review. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2006;17(1):36–45. doi: 10.1053/j.spid.2006.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Waring SC, Brown BJ. The threat of communicable diseases following natural disasters: a public health response. Disaster Manag Response. 2005;3(2):41–7. doi: 10.1016/j.dmr.2005.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sur D, Dutta P, Nair GB, Bhattacharya SK. Severe cholera outbreak following floods in a northern district of West Bengal. Indian J Med Res. 2000;112:178–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kondo H, Seo N, Yasuda T, Hasizume M, Koido Y, Ninomiya N, et al. Post-flood--infectious diseases in Mozambique. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002;17(3):126–33. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00000340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Waring SC, Reynolds KM, D’Souza G, Arafat RR. Rapid assessment of household needs in the Houston area after Tropical Storm Allison. Disaster Manag Response. 2002:3–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gupta SK, Suantio A, Gray A, Widyastuti E, Jain N, Rolos R, et al. Factors associated with E.coli contamination of household drinking water among tsunami and earthquake survivors, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76(6):1158–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Khedmat H, Taheri S. Immunization of rescuers against hepatitis A virus infection in disasterous areas. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2005;8(2):37–43. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sencan I, Sahin I, Kaya D, Oksuz S, Yildirim M. Assessment of HAV and HEV seroprevalence in children living in post-earthquake camps from Duzce, Turkey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(5):461–5. doi: 10.1023/b:ejep.0000027357.57403.3a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sarkar U, Nascimento SF, Barbosa R, Martins R, Nuevo H, Kalofonos I, et al. Population-based case-control investigation of risk factors for leptospirosis during an urban epidemic. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66(5):605–10. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gaynor K, Katz AR, Park SY, Nakata M, Clark TA, Effler PV. Leptospirosis on Oahu: an outbreak associated with flooding of a university campus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76(5):882–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bhardwaj P, Kosambiya JK, Desai VK. A case control study to explore the risk factors for acquisition of leptospirosis in Surat city, after flood. Indian J Med Sci. 2008;62(11):431–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liverpool J, Francis S, Liverpool CE, Dean GT, Mendez DD. Leptospirosis: case reports of an outbreak in Guyana. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2008;102(3):239–245. doi: 10.1179/136485908X278784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marin M, Nguyen HQ, Langidrik JR, Edwards R, Briand K, Papania MJ, et al. Measles transmission and vaccine effectiveness during a large outbreak on a densely populated island: implications for vaccination policy. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(3):315–9. doi: 10.1086/498902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Greenough P. Infectious Diseases and Disasters. In: Hogan DE, Borstein JL, editors. Disaster Medicine. Philadelphia: William and Wilkinz; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Saenz R, Bissell RA, Paniagua F. Post-disaster malaria in Costa Rica. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1995;10(3):154–60. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00041935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gagnon AS, Smoyer-Tomic KE, Bush AB. The El Nino southern oscillation and malaria epidemics in South America. Int J Biometeorol. 2002;46(2):81–9. doi: 10.1007/s00484-001-0119-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lim PL. Wound infections in tsunami survivors: a commentary. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2005;34(9):582–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jensen PK, Meyrowitsch DW, Konradsen F. [Water and sanitation in disaster situations] Ugeskr Laeger. 2010;172(2):109–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ivers LC, Ryan ET. Infectious diseases of severe weather-related and flood-related natural disasters. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2006;19(5):408–14. doi: 10.1097/01.qco.0000244044.85393.9e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wilder-Smith A. Tsunami in South Asia: what is the risk of post-disaster infectious disease outbreaks? Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2005;34(10):625–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lashley FR. Factors contributing to the occurrence of emerging infectious diseases. Biol Res Nurs. 2003;4(4):258–67. doi: 10.1177/1099800403251238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Loghmani A, Jafari N, Memarzadeh M. Determining the field hospital setting in earthquake: Using RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2008;10(3):184–92. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Waring SC, Brown BJ. The threat of communicable diseases following natural disasters: a public health response. Disaster Manag Response. 2005;3(2):41–7. doi: 10.1016/j.dmr.2005.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tierney K, Lindell M, Perry R. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Joseph Henry Press. 2001 [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brown DW, Young SL, Engelgau MM, Mensah GA. Evidence-based approach for disaster preparedness authorities to inform the contents of repositories for prescription medications for chronic disease management and control. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(5):447–57. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x0000618x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Aldrich N, Benson WF. Disaster preparedness and the chronic disease needs of vulnerable older adults. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5(1):A27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rawls C, Turnquist M. Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 44(4):521–34. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Memarzadeh M, Loghmani A, Jafari N. The Field Hospital Setting in Earthquake. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2004;6(5):199. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Veenema TG. Disaster Nursing and Emergency Preparedness for Chemical, Biological, and Radiological Terrorism and Other Hazards. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mechler R. Natural DisasterRiskManagement and Financing Disaster Losses in Developing Countries. Verlag Versicherungswirtsch. 2004 [Google Scholar]
- 47.Peacock W, Dash N, Zhang Y. Sheltering and Housing Recovery Following Disaster. In: Rodriguez H, Quarantelli E, Dynes R, Anderson WA, Kenedy PJ, editors. Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 48.El-Anwar O, El-Rayes K, Elnashai A. Maximizing temporary housing safety after natural disasters. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. 2010;16(2):138–48. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tsai C, Chen C, Chiang W, Lin M. Application of geographic information system to the allocation of disaster shelters via fuzzy models Engineering Computations. 2008;25(1):86–100. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gostelow L. The Sphere Project: the implications of making humanitarian principles and codes work. Disasters. 1999;23(4):316–25. doi: 10.1111/1467-7717.00121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fernando WBG, Gunapala AH, Jayantha WA. Water supply and sanitation needs in a disaster - Lessons learned through the tsunami disaster in Sri Lanka. Desalination. 2011;248(1-3):14–21. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Webster J, Smith J, Smith T, Okello F. Water Safety Plans in Disaster Management: Appropriate Risk Management of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene in the Context of Rural and Peri-Urban Communities in Low-Income Countries. Risk Management of Water Supply and Sanitation Systems. 2009:145–52. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Young H, Harvey P. The sphere project: the humanitarian charter and minimum standards in disaster response: introduction. Disasters. 2004;28(2):99. doi: 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00245.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Shimi A, Parvin G, Biswas C, Shaw R. Impact and adaptation to flood: A focus on water supply, sanitation and health problems of rural community in Bangladesh. Disaster Prevention and Management. 2010;19(3):298–313. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cronin AA, Shrestha D, Cornier N, Abdalla F, Ezard N, Aramburu C. A review of water and sanitation provision in refugee camps in association with selected health and nutrition indicators--the need for integrated service provision. J Water Health. 2008;6(1):1–13. doi: 10.2166/wh.2007.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.World Health Organization. Ensuring food safety in the aftermath of natural disasters. [Online] 2005. [cited 2010 Dec 2]. Available from:URL: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/foodborne_disease/emergency/en/index6.html .
- 57.Takken W, Knols B. Ecology and Control of Vector-borne Diseases: Wageningen Acad. Pub. 2007 [Google Scholar]
- 58.Salama P, Spiegel P, Talley L, Waldman R. Lessons learned from complex emergencies over past decade. The Lancet. 2004;364(9447):1801–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17405-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Planning F, Procurement V. Immunization News. SAGE. 2010;13:15. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Connolly M. Communicable disease control in emergencies: A field manual. Geneva: WHO; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response: The Sphere Project Geneva. 1998 doi: 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00245.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.The Interagency Emergency Health Kit. 3rd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Minimum standards in health services. The sphere project Geneva. 2005 [Google Scholar]