Abstract
Purpose. Docetaxel/5-FU/CDDP (DFP) therapy is a useful treatment for advanced esophageal cancer. However, adverse reactions such as chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) interfere often with continuation of the chemotherapy. We investigated the efficacy of rikkunshito (TJ-43) on CINV. Methods. Nineteen patients who were going to undergo DFP therapy were enrolled. They were assigned to the following two groups: a TJ-43-treated group and -nontreated group. The following parameters were compared between the 2 groups: (1) the frequency of symptoms occurred, (2) vomiting, nausea, and anorexia score, and (3) QOL score. Results. The incidence of symptoms was lower in the TJ-43-treated group than that in the control group. The nausea score of the TJ-43-treated group was significantly lower than that of the control group. In the QOL score, the mood score and the ADL score decreased significantly in the control group. Conclusion. We recommend TJ-43 administration in patients undergoing DFP chemotherapy.
1. Introduction
Esophageal cancer is a highly malignant neoplasm with poor prognosis. The mortality of this disease is 9.0 per 100,000 (15.7 per 100,000 in males, 2.6 in females), representing 3.4% (4.9% in males, 1.3% in females) of all deaths by malignant neoplasm in 2006. Mortality has increased slightly over the past two decades despite recent improvements in diagnosis and treatment [1]. The esophagus has complicated relations not only with the nearby organs such as trachea, lung, and aorta but also with the lymphatic tissue network. Therefore, the cancer generated at the esophagus shows easily lymph node metastasis in the wide range from the cervical region to the abdominal region even when it is a superficial cancer [2]. This is why surgical intervention accompanied by extensive lymph node dissection has been performed for the radical treatment of esophagus cancer [3]. Since the invasion accompanying such radical surgery gives marked influences on the postoperative quality of life (QOL) [4], the importance of multidisciplinary approach including surgery/chemotherapy/radiotherapy is being recognized more and more to achieve successful radical therapy. Japan clinical oncology group (JCOG) conducted a phase II study of chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage II, III esophageal carcinoma (ESCC): (JCOG9906 study), but the result showed lesser than the surgical results of Japanese high-volume centers [5]. The effect of chemotherapy on esophagus cancer has already been demonstrated [6], and it was recently reported that preoperative chemotherapy is more effective than postoperative chemotherapy [7]. We have actively performed DFP therapy as preoperative chemotherapy and obtained favorable results, but leukocytopenia and alopecia and also gastrointestinal adverse reactions such as vomiting, nausea, and anorexia (so-called chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: CINV) interfere often with continuation of the chemotherapy [8]. To alleviate for CINV, a steroid preparation, a 5-HT3 antagonist, and a gastrointestinal complaint-treating agent are used, but these drugs are not satisfactory in the light of efficacy and safety, and there is also a problem in the aspect of medical economy.
Recently in Japan, the kampo preparation rikkunshito (TJ-43) having a gastrointestinal motility-improving effect is often used for the treatment of vomiting, nausea, or anorexia. Tomono et al. reported the effect of TJ-43 on retching occurring during breast cancer chemotherapy [9]. It is therefore expected that TJ-43 would exert an alleviating effect for the CINV caused by DFP therapy. However, few papers have clearly referred to the effect of TJ-43 on vomiting, nausea, or anorexia occurring during chemotherapy. In this study, for the purpose of improving the QOL of patients undergoing chemotherapy, we investigated the efficacy and safety of TJ-43 in the treatment of adverse reactions (vomiting, nausea or anorexia) to DFP therapy in patients with advanced esophagus cancer.
2. Methods
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokushima University Hospital and conducted in compliance with the ethical principle of the Helsinki Declaration.
2.1. Study Patients
In the period from August 2008 to March 2009, 19 patients with advanced esophagus cancer (age: 52–79 years, disease stage: II or III) who were going to undergo DFP therapy submitted written informed consent to participate in this study after receiving sufficient explanations about the contents of this study. The ECOG Performance Scale needed to be 0–2 in these patients. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients who had undergone gastrectomy or endoscopic gastrostomy, (2) patients with renal dysfunction, cardiac dysfunction, or bone-marrow dysfunction, (3) patients with serious complication such as cardiac failure or acute inflammatory disease, (4) female patients who were pregnant, planning pregnancy, or breastfeeding, and (5) patients taking other kampo drug excluding rikkunshito.
2.2. Drugs
Rikkunshito, one of traditional Japanese medicines, which has been approved for medicinal use by the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, is extract granules for Ethical Use (Tsumura and Co., Product number TJ-43, 7.5 g), containing 4.0 g of dried extract obtained from mixed crude drugs in the following ratio: JP Atractylodes Lancea Rhizome, 4.0 g; JP Ginseng, 4.0 g; JP Pinellia Tuber, 4.0 g; JP Poria Sclerotium, 4.0 g; JP Jujube, 2.0 g; JP Citrus Unshiu Peel, 2.0 g; JP Glycyrrhiza, 1.0 g; and JP Ginger, 0.5 g. Subjects took 2.5 g of rikkunshito three times a day before each meal.
2.3. Study Design
The basic chemotherapy in this study was DFP therapy, which was performed according to the regimen specified at this hospital for advanced esophagus cancer. In detail, CDDP 10 mg/body was intravenously infused on days 1–5, 5-FU 370 mg/m2 was intravenously infused on days 1–5, docetaxel 25 mg/m2 was intravenously infused on day 1 and day 8 in each cycle, and this cycle was repeated 4 times. This study was conducted in the period from day 1 to day 14. As antiemetic drugs, azasetron 10 mg/day was intravenously infused on days 1–5 and dexamethasone 8 mg was intravenously infused on Day 1.
Subjects were randomly assigned to the TJ-43-treated group and the TJ-43-non-treated group (the control group). In the TJ-43-treated group, TJ-43 was orally administered from Day 1 for 2 weeks. All the subjects were inquired about the symptoms on Days 1–5, Day 8, and Day 14. The investigators who assessed severity and QOL were not informed which group the patients belonged to.
2.4. Efficacy Evaluation
The primary index was the change in each symptom (vomiting, nausea, or anorexia) 2 weeks after the TJ-43 treatment. The symptom severity was evaluated with CTCAE Version 3.0 on days 1–5, day 8, and day 14. For comparison between the 2 groups, the CTCAE grade was scored according to the following rules: no symptoms: 0 point, and CTCAE grade 1–4: 1 point-4 point.
As the secondary index, the effect of TJ-43 treatment on QOL was evaluated on Day 1 and Day 14. Five items of sleep, mood, volition, activity of daily living (ADL), and anxiety feeling were set for QOL scoring. Each item was scored on the five-grade scale of 1–5 according to QOL-ACD [10] (Figure 1). Almost patients filled out question paper by themselves. But some patients could not fill it because of bad condition; so the investigator asked symptoms showing the interview sheet and filled it for them. The assessment was done by the doctor who did not participate in this study.
Figure 1.
Interview sheet of QOL.
2.5. Safety Evaluation
An adverse event was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, whether or not considered to be causally related to the study drug, and was recorded in the medical record. On day 14, the patients answered the standardized question: “Have you had any health problems since you started to take the study drug”?
2.6. Statistical Analysis
In order to summarize the subject information before the treatment, the subject background factors and the summary statistics of the evaluation items on Day 1 were obtained for all the subjects assigned. One subject who deviated from the age-related inclusion criterion was not included in the efficacy analysis. The differences between Day 1 and Day 14 were subjected to calculation of summary statistics and intergroup comparison by Wilcoxon's rank sum test. The differences were tested for significance with a two-sided significance level of 5%. The intragroup comparison between Day 1 and Day 14 was performed by Wilcoxon's signed rank test. No adjustment was made for multiple tests.
3. Results
No subjects reported vomiting, nausea, or anorexia before the assignment. One subject of the TJ-43 treated group was excluded from evaluation due to deviation from the age-related inclusion criterion (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Enrollment and randomization of study patients.
There were no differences between the two groups in male/female ratio, age, and BMI of the subjects (Table 1).
Table 1.
Demographic and medical characteristics of the study patients.
| TJ-43-treated group (n = 9) | TJ-43-nontreated group (n = 10) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Sex (male/female) | 8/1 | 7/3 |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 63 ± 6.2 | 68.1 ± 7.3 |
| BMI (mean ± SD) | 21.9 ± 1.9 | 21.2 ± 3.3 |
| Clinical stage | ||
| II A | 1 | 1 |
| II B | 1 | 0 |
| III | 2 | 7 |
| IV | 5 | 2 |
| Performance status | ||
| 0 | 9 | 9 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 |
3.1. Incidence of Symptoms
Table 2 shows the number and rate of subjects who reported vomiting, nausea, or anorexia in each group. The incidence of vomiting, nausea, or anorexia was lower in the TJ-43 treated group than that in the TJ-43 non-treated group. In the TJ-43-treated group, 3 of 8 subjects presented with vomiting, nausea or anorexia on Day 14. On the other hand, in the TJ-43 non-treated group, 8 of 10 subjects had vomiting, nausea, or anorexia on Day 14, but the symptom incidence was not significantly different between the 2 groups.
Table 2.
Frequency of vomiting, nausea, and anorexia at 14 days.
| TJ-43 treated group N (%) | TJ-43 nontreated group N (%) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vomiting | Not reported | 7 (87.5) | 6 (60.0) |
| Reported | 1 (12.5) | 4 (40.0) | |
| Nausea | Not reported | 5 (62.5) | 2 (20.0) |
| Reported | 3 (37.5) | 8 (80.0) | |
| Anorexia | Not reported | 5 (37.5) | 3 (30.0) |
| Reported | 3 (62.5) | 7 (70.0) |
3.2. Time-Course Changes in Score of Vomiting, Nausea, or Anorexia
The increase of nausea score was significantly suppressed in the TJ-43 treated group as compared with TJ-43 non-treated group (0.50 ± 0.76 versus 1.80 ± 1.23 on day 14) (Figure 3). The increases of vomiting score and anorexia score tended to be suppressed in the TJ-43 treated group as compared with the TJ-43 non-treated group, but no significant inter-group difference was observed (Figures 4 and 5).
Figure 3.
Time-course changes in score of nausea. Each plot refers to mean ± SD. ∗: Significant difference of the score deterioration between the TJ-43 treated group and the TJ-43 non-treated group (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon's rank sum test).
Figure 4.
Time-course changes in score of vomiting. Each plot refers to mean ± SD. There were no significant differences in score change between the TJ-43 treated group and the TJ-43 non-treated group (Wilcoxon's rank sum test).
Figure 5.
Time-course changes in score of anorexia. Each plot refers to mean ± SD. There were no significant differences in score change between the TJ-43 treated group and the TJ-43 non-treated group (Wilcoxon's rank sum test).
3.3. Time-Course Changes in Score of QOL
Among the QOL scores, the mood score decreased significantly from 3.50 ± 0.53 on day 1 to 1.89 ± 1.05 on day 14 in the TJ-43 non-treated group but showed no change in the TJ-43 treated group (Figure 6). Similarly, the ADL score decreased significantly from 4.10 ± 0.74 on Day 1 to 2.89 ± 1.05 on Day 14 in the TJ-43 non-treated group (Figure 7). The differences between Day 1 and Day 14 in mood score and ADL score were significantly lower in the TJ-43 treated group than those in the TJ-43 non-treated group (Figure 8). The changes in scores of sleep, volition, and anxiety feeling were not different between the TJ-43 treated group and the TJ-43 non-treated group.
Figure 6.
Change in score of mood. Each plot refers to mean ± SD. *Significant difference between the score on day 1 and day 14 in the TJ-43 non-treated group (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon's signed rank test).
Figure 7.
Changes in score of ADL. Each plot refers to mean ± SD. *Significant difference between the score on day 1 and day 14 in the TJ-43 non-treated group (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon's signed rank test).
Figure 8.
Change in QOL score of mood or ADL after the 2-week treatment. Each column represents the mean ± SD. *Significant difference of the change in QOL score between the TJ-43 treated group and the TJ-43 non-treated group (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon's rank sum test).
3.4. Adverse Events
In the study period, none of the subjects developed any potential adverse reactions to TJ-43.
3.5. Therapeutic Effect of DFP Therapy
Looking at the therapeutic effect of DFP therapy (Cycle 1), CR was seen in 2 subjects, PR in 5 subjects, and SD in 1 subject in the TJ-43 treated group, and CR in 3 subjects, PR in 5 subjects, and SD in 2 subjects in the TJ-43 non-treated group.
4. Discussion
This is the first prospective randomized study that demonstrated the efficacy of TJ-43 against CINV accompanying DFP therapy in patients with advanced esophagus cancer.
Esophagus cancer is one of the malignant tumors encountered frequently and ranked seventh among the cancer-related causes of death in the world [11]. It is one of the intractable cancers. Esophagectomy accompanied by extensive lymph node dissection is the standard therapy, but the 5-year survival rate achieved by this surgery alone was reported to be only 10%–20% in the advanced cases [12–14]. In the advanced cases, the possibility of recurrence is high even after radical resection, and the therapeutic effect of surgical therapy alone is insufficient. It is therefore necessary to perform effective perioperative management therapy for achieving successful radical therapy, and as the standard therapy against esophagus cancer, FP therapy using CDDP and 5-FU was proposed [15, 16]. Furthermore in recent years, FP therapy added with docetaxel (DFP therapy) was reported to give a higher response rate [17–19] and we also obtained favorable results in patients with esophagus cancer [20, 21]. However, whereas DFP therapy is more effective than FP therapy, DFP therapy often induces not only leukocytopenia and alopecia but also gastrointestinal symptoms such as vomiting, nausea, and/or anorexia. CINV are common adverse reactions of chemotherapy, but they are considered by patients to be one of the most distressing concerns of cancer treatment [22, 23]. The failure in prevention of CINV in the first cycle of chemotherapy increases the patient's resistance to the chemotherapy leading to abandonment of cancer therapy [24, 25]. Therefore, CINV control is the key point for successful completion of chemotherapy and QOL maintenance in the patients. CINV is roughly classified into acute, delayed, and anticipatory types depending on the onset timing of vomiting [26]. The symptoms occurring in the first 24 hours after starting the chemotherapy are defined as acute CINV and can be controlled with an antiemetic drug. On the other hand, the delayed CINV occurring more than 24 hours after starting the chemotherapy show a lower incidence as compared with the acute CINV but are difficult to control [27]. In order to control the delayed CINV, a dopamine antagonist, a steroid, a 5-HT3 antagonist and an NK1 receptor antagonist are used alone or in combination in a preventive manner from before starting the chemotherapy [28], but the effect is not necessarily satisfactory. Then, the second-generation 5-HT3 antagonist and NK1 receptor antagonist have been used only for a short period yet in Japan, and besides, these drugs are expensive, with problem in view of medical economics. To complete chemotherapy while maintaining the patient's QOL, it is desirable to establish a convenient and effective treatment method.
This time, we focused on a kampo drug TJ-43, which is frequently used not only against functional dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and gastrointestinal symptoms after surgery but also against gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and vomiting induced by a psychotropic drugs or anticancer drugs [29–33]. So, we investigated the possibility of TJ-43 as an antiemetic drug. As a result, the incidences of CINV or anorexia tended to be lower in the TJ-43 treated group, and especially TJ-43 treatment significantly suppressed the incidence of nausea. Furthermore, the QOL deterioration in terms of mood or ADL was suppressed by the TJ-43 treatment. These results suggested that oral administration of TJ-43 would alleviate the unpleasant symptoms in patients undergoing chemotherapy. The fact that the difference in intensity of CINV between the TJ-43 treated group and the TJ-43 non-treated group became greater with increasing time after starting the treatment suggested the efficacy of TJ-43 against the delayed CINV refractory to a 5-HT3 antagonist.
As the action mechanism supporting the clinical effect of TJ-43, Tominaga et al. clarified that TJ-43 enhances gastric motility through the 5-HT3 receptor-antagonistic effect and speculated that the effect is mediated by a signal transmission route different from that for 5-HT3 receptor-antagonist [34]. If TJ-43 has such specific effect, it may be possible to explain the reason why TJ-43 can alleviate the CINV induced by serotonin in the case of cisplatin, and so forth; especially the delayed CINV are resistant to a 5-HT3 antagonist. To investigate usefulness of TJ-43 is required for different regimens of chemotherapy and for variety of cancer types hereafter.
Our study was performed as a pilot study to conduct a future large-scale randomized controlled trial. There may be a limitation of statistical confidence in this study, because number of subjects was small. However, even among the small number of subjects, there was a significant difference. Therefore, we consider that the results are worth reporting. In this study, the efficacy of TJ-43 against CINV was shown in esophagus cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy (DFP therapy). The add-on treatment with TJ-43 not only suppressed the increase of nausea score but also maintained the patient's mood and ADL. We propose to use TJ-43 together with a 5HT3 antagonist, a steroid, an NK1 receptor antagonist, and so forth as one of the anti-CINV treatment strategies in patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Abbreviations
- TJ-43:
Rikkunshito
- DFP:
Docetaxel/5-FU/CDDP
- QOL:
Quality of life
- JCOG:
Japan clinical oncology group
- CINV:
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
- ADL:
Activities of daily living.
References
- 1. Mortality Rate by Cancer Site, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan, http://www.ncc.go.jp/
- 2.Kato H, Tachimori Y, Watanabe H, Yamaguchi H, Ishikawa T, Itabashi M. Superficial esophageal carcinoma. Surgical treatment and the results. Cancer. 1990;66(11):2319–2323. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901201)66:11<2319::aid-cncr2820661111>3.0.co;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Annals of Surgery. 1994;220(3):364–373. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199409000-00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tabira Y, Yasunaga M, Nagamoto N, et al. Quality of life after esophagectomy for cancer: an assessment using the questionnaire with the face scale. Surgery Today. 2002;32(3):213–219. doi: 10.1007/s005950200023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Muro K, Ohtsu A, Ishikura S, Boku N, Takiuchi H, et al. A phase II study of chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage II, III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): (JCOG 9906) Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25(18s, supplement) ASCO Annual Meeting, abstract no. 15137. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ando N, Iizuka T, Ide H, et al. Surgery plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: a Japan clinical oncology group study—JCOG9204. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2003;21(24):4592–4596. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Igaki H, Kato H, Ando N, Shinoda M, Shimizu H, et al. A randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage II/III squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus(JCOG 9907) Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2008;26(15s, supplement) doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2049-9. ASCO Annual Meeting, abstract no. 4510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yoshida T, Seike J, Miyoshi T, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy with weekly docetaxel plus low-dose cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for stage II/III squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Esophagus. 2010;7(2):95–100. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tomono H, Ito Y, Watanabe T. Successful antiemetics treatment of TSUMURA Rikkunshit-to extract granules for ethical use in addition to other antiemetics agents in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for an advanved breast cancer patietnt. Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy. 2006;33(8):1129–1131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kurihara M, Shimizu H, Tsuboi K, Kobayashi K, Murakami M, Eguchi K, et al. Development of quality of life questionnaire in Japan: quality of life assessment of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Psycho-Oncology. 1999;8(4):355–363. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199907/08)8:4<355::AID-PON401>3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fisichella PM, Patti MG. Esophageal cancer. eMedicine: Oncology. 2009 http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/277930-overview. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Alibakhshi A, Aminian A, Mirsharifi R, Jahangiri Y, Dashti H, Karimian F. The effect of age on the outcome of esophageal cancer surgery. Annals of Thoracic Medicine. 2009;4(2):71–74. doi: 10.4103/1817-1737.49415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ruol A, Portale G, Zaninotto G, et al. Results of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: age has little influence on outcome and survival. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2007;133(5):1186–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.12.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Internullo E, Moons J, Nafteux P, et al. Outcome after esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and GEJ in patients aged over 75 years. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2008;33(6):1096–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sekiguchi H, Akiyama S, Fujiwara M, et al. Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and low-dose cisplatin in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Surgery Today. 1999;29(2):97–101. doi: 10.1007/BF02482231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, et al. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). Radiation therapy oncology group. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;281(17):1623–1627. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.17.1623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tanaka T, Sueyoshi S, Sasahara H, et al. Preliminary evaluation of chemotherapy with docetaxel, 5-FU, CDDP for recurrent esophageal cancer—a pilot study. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003;30(12):1955–1958. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V25 study group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006;24(31):4991–4997. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ehara K, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Ueno M, Mine S, Udagawa H. A case of advanced esophageal cancer with liver metastases: efficacy of combination therapy of docetaxel/cisplatin/5-FU. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2008;35(8):1375–1378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Seike J, Yoshida T, Honda J, Miyoshi T, Umemoto A, Tangoku A. An elderly case of advanced cervical esophageal cancer successfully treated with UFT after chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel/ 5-FU/ CDDP. Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy. 2007;34(8):1271–1274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Seike J, Matsuoka H, Yuasa Y, et al. A complete response in a case of advanced esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel/ 5-FU/ CDDP and S-1/ docetaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy. 2008;35(4):633–636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sun CC, Bodurka DC, Weaver CB, et al. Rankings and symptom assessments of side effects from chemotherapy: insights from experienced patients with ovarian cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2005;13(4):219–227. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0710-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lindley CM, Hirsch JD, O’Neill CV, Transau MC, Gilbert CS, Osterhaus JT. Quality of life consequences of chemotherapy-induced emesis. Quality of Life Research. 1992;1(5):331–340. doi: 10.1007/BF00434947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Richardson JL, Marks G, Levine A. The influence of symptoms of disease and side effects of treatment on compliance with cancer therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1988;6(11):1746–1752. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.11.1746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schnell FM. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: the importance of acute antiemetic control. Oncologist. 2003;8(2):187–198. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.8-2-187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR, et al. American society of clinical oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: update 2006. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006;24(18):2932–2947. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.9591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Grunberg SM, Deuson RR, Mavros P, et al. Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemetics: perception versus reality. Cancer. 2004;100(10):2261–2268. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pooja D, Singhal S, Swati S, Deepika H. Management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Indian Pediatrics. 2010;47(2):149–155. doi: 10.1007/s13312-010-0023-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tatsuta M, Iishi H. Effect of treatment with Liu-Jun-Zi-Tang (TJ-43) on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal symptoms in dyspeptic patients. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 1993;7(4):459–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1993.tb00120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yagi M, Homma S, Kubota M, et al. The herbal medicine rikkunshi-to stimulates and coordinates the gastric myoelectric activity in post-operative dyspeptic children after gastrointestinal surgery. Pediatric Surgery International. 2004;19(12):760–765. doi: 10.1007/s00383-003-1053-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kawahara H, Kubota A, Hasegawa T, et al. Effects of rikkunshito on the clinical symptoms and esophageal acid exposure in children with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. Pediatric Surgery International. 2007;23(10):1001–1005. doi: 10.1007/s00383-007-1986-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Takahashi T, Endo S, Nakajima K, Souma Y, Nishida T. Effect of rikkunshito, a Chinese herbal medicine, on stasis in patients after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. World Journal of Surgery. 2009;33(2):296–302. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9854-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oka T, Tamagawa Y, Hayashida S, Kaneda Y, Kodama N. Rikkunshi-to attenuates adverse gastrointestinal symptoms induced by fluvoxamine. BioPsychoSocial Medicine. 2007;1, article 21 doi: 10.1186/1751-0759-1-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tominaga K, Kido T, Ochi M, et al. The traditional Japanese medicine rikkunshito promotes gastric emptying via the antagonistic action of the 5-HT3 receptor pathway in rats. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2011;2011:8 pages. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nep173. Article ID 248481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]