Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2012 Feb;78(3):813–821. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06544-11

Multiple Plastids Collected by the Dinoflagellate Dinophysis mitra through Kleptoplastidy

Goh Nishitani a,b, Satoshi Nagai a,, Shiho Hayakawa c, Yuki Kosaka d, Kiyonari Sakurada e, Takashi Kamiyama a, Takashi Gojobori c
PMCID: PMC3264124  PMID: 22101051

Abstract

Kleptoplastidy is the retention of plastids obtained from ingested algal prey, which may remain temporarily functional and be used for photosynthesis by the predator. We showed that the marine dinoflagellate Dinophysis mitra has great kleptoplastid diversity. We obtained 308 plastid rbcL sequences by gene cloning from 14 D. mitra cells and 102 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Most sequences were new in the genetic database and positioned within Haptophyceae (227 sequences [73.7%], 80 OTUs [78.4%]), particularly within the genus Chrysochromulina. Others were closely related to Prasinophyceae (16 sequences [5.2%], 5 OTUs [4.9%]), Dictyochophyceae (14 sequences [4.5%], 5 OTUs [4.9%]), Pelagophyceae (14 sequences [4.5%], 1 OTU [1.0%]), Bolidophyceae (3 sequences [1.0%], 1 OTU [1.0%]), and Bacillariophyceae (1 sequence [0.3%], 1 OTU [1.0%]); however, 33 sequences (10.8%) as 9 OTUs (8.8%) were not closely clustered with any particular group. Only six sequences were identical to those of Chrysochromulina simplex, Chrysochromulina hirta, Chrysochromulina sp. TKB8936, Micromonas pusilla NEPCC29, Micromonas pusilla CCMP491, and an unidentified diatom. Thus, we detected >100 different plastid sequences from 14 D. mitra cells, strongly suggesting kleptoplastidy and the need for mixotrophic prey such as Laboea, Tontonia, and Strombidium-like ciliates, which retain numerous symbiotic plastids from different origins, for propagation and plastid sequestration.

INTRODUCTION

Dinoflagellates are a diverse group of unicellular flagellate eukaryotic algae which widely inhabit fresh and marine waters of the world and serve as significant primary producers. Many dinoflagellate species are photosynthetic. The diversity of plastids (chloroplasts) in dinoflagellates results from the acquisition of different types of photosynthetic endosymbionts (3, 10, 23, 49, 51, 54), heterotrophic nutrition (4, 36, 46), or both, i.e., mixotrophy (50, 60). The types of plastids found in dinoflagellates to date are classified into five categories: (i) a type containing chlorophyll a plus c (a/c) and fucoxanthin derived from a diatom, (ii) a chlorophyll a/b type derived from a chlorophyte, (iii) a chlorophyll a/c and fucoxanthin derivative type derived from a haptophyte, (iv) a chlorophyll a/c and phycobilin type derived from a cryptophyte (51), and (v) kleptoplastids (12, 49, 51). In addition to dinoflagellates with permanent plastids (permanent endosymbioses), there are several taxonomic groups of dinoflagellates having kleptoplastids (stolen plastids) (49), which are temporary but functional plastids captured from prey (6, 13, 20, 22, 29, 37, 40, 41, 44, 52, 57). Amphidinium poecilochroum (22), Amphidinium latum (13), Amylax buxus and Amylax triacantha (21), Gymnodinium aeruginosum (52), Gymnodinium acidotum (6, 62), Gymnodinium gracilentum (53), Cryptoperidiniopsis sp. (5), Pfiesteria piscicida (29), and mixotrophic Dinophysis species (35, 37, 40, 41, 44, 57) rob plastids from cryptophyte prey directly or indirectly.

Diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) is a severe gastrointestinal disease caused by the consumption of shellfish that are contaminated with DSP toxins (64). DSP toxins are derived from dinoflagellates belonging to the genera Dinophysis and Prorocentrum (28, 63). At present, 11 species of Dinophysis are known to be toxic (28, 30). Despite extensive studies in the last 2 decades, little is known about the ecophysiology, toxicology, and bloom mechanisms of Dinophysis species, primarily because of the inability to culture them (15, 30, 38, 48). Recently, feeding by myzocytosis was revealed in Dinophysis acuminata, Dinophysis caudata, Dinophysis fortii, and Dinophysis infundibulus, with successful culturing of the species at high cell densities (0.8 × 103 to 11.0 × 103 cells ml−1) (37, 40, 41, 44). The four Dinophysis species feed on the marine ciliate Myrionecta rubra (Mesodinium rubrum) (Mesodiniidae: Litostomatea) grown with the cryptophyte Teleaulax. The experimental data clearly showed that these species could not grow by ingestion of only the Teleaulax sp. Instead, the Dinophysis species required M. rubra as prey for enabling their vegetative growth and sequestered the ciliate plastids in order to utilize them as kleptoplastids (37).

Dinophysis mitra is known to be one of the toxic Dinophysis species (28) and a kleptoplastidic species, and on the basis of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and molecular analysis, it is speculated that the kleptoplastids have originated from haptophytes (20). Usually, D. mitra retains a number of plastids in a cell (Fig. 1); these plastids are robbed from other microalgae, and they retain their photosynthetic activity in D. mitra cells (20). However, in this regard, only one study has been conducted thus far; therefore, plastid diversity in D. mitra and precise origins from prey organisms remain unknown. Naturally, no D. mitra culture has been established to date because of lack of prey information. In the present study, we analyzed the plastid rbcL (encoding the large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase [RuBisCO]) sequences in natural D. mitra cells isolated from Japanese coastal waters to reveal the origins of kleptoplastids in D. mitra and reported a previously unknown type of kleptoplastidy as the cause of the diversity of acquired plastids.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Micrographs of a vegetative cell of Dinophysis mitra obtained from a natural sample in bright field (left) and with fluorescence under blue light excitation (right). Plastids in the D. mitra cell are emitting red autofluorescence. Scale bar, 30 μm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation of D. mitra and DNA extraction.

A total of 14 natural D. mitra cells were isolated by micropipetting from seawater samples collected in the Mutsu Bay,(40°56′N, 140°51′E) in August 2009, Seto Inland Sea (33°53′N, 132°10′E) in July 2009, and Yatsushiro Sea (32°27′N, 130°29′E) in July 2009, in Japan (Fig. 2). Species identification was based on the morphological characteristics observed by light microscopy (1) and molecular analysis. Each cell of D. mitra was washed by several transfers in filtered (pore size, 0.1 μm) seawater, separately inoculated into 0.2-ml tubes containing 15 μl of 10% Chelex suspension (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Richmond, CA), and frozen at −30°C until use. DNA was extracted by heating at 95°C for 20 min, according to Richlen and Barber (47).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Sampling locations of natural D. mitra cells. The numbers in parentheses refer to the numbers of isolated cells.

PCR and cloning of nuclear 18S rRNA and plastid rbcL genes in D. mitra cells.

For amplifying the nuclear 18S rRNA gene of D. mitra, three primer pairs (18S-1F1/18S-1R632, 18S-2F576/18S-2R1209, and 18S-3F1129/18S-R1772) were used (Table 1), and the gene sequences were determined according to the method of Nishitani et al. (39, 41). In order to check for any contamination by symbiotic microorganisms within the D. mitra cells or any ingested prey species in food vacuoles, partial nuclear 18S rRNA gene sequences were also amplified from the DNA extracts of the D. mitra cells by using a universal primer pair (18S-F1289/18S-R1772) (Table 1), and 5 to 11 sequences (6.9 ± 1.8, average ± standard deviation [SD]) were determined from each D. mitra cell (total number of sequences, 96).

Table 1.

Details of the primers used in this studya

Target region Target organism Primer name Sequence (5′–3′) Annealing site (nt)b
Nuclear 18S rRNA Marine dinoflagellate 18S-1F1 AACCTGGTTGATYCTGCCAG 1–20c
18S-1R632 ACTACGAGCTTTTTAACYGCARC 610–632c
18S-2F576 GGTAATTCCAGCTCYAATRG 576–595c
18S-2R1209 AAGTTTYCCCGTGTTGARTC 1190–1209c
18S-3F1129 GCTGAAACTTAAAGRAATTGACGGA 1129–1153c
Marine eukaryotic microalga 18S-F1289 TGGAGTGATTTGTCTGGTTRATTCCG 1289–1314d
18S-R1772 TCACCTACGGAAACCTTGTTACG 1749–1772d
Plastid rbcL Marine chromophyte microalga rbcL-F118 ACWTGGACWGTWGTWTGGAC 118–137e
rbcL-R876 CATCCAYTTACARATWACACGG 855–876e
Marine chlorophyte microalga rbcL-F184 TCWACWGGWACWTGGACWAC 184–203f
rbcL-R704 AYYTCRCCWGTYTCWGHTTG 685–704f
a

All primers were designed in the course of the present study.

b

nt, nucleotides.

c

Dinophysis acuta (AJ506973).

d

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (M32703).

e

Imantonia rotunda (AB043696).

f

Ostreococcus tauri (CR954199).

For amplifying the plastid rbcL (encoding the RuBisCO large subunit) gene of D. mitra, two primer pairs (rbcL-F118/rbcL-R876 and rbcL-F184/rbcL-R704) were designed as universal primers to cover chromophyte microalgae (Bolidophyceae, Chrysophyceae, Cryptophyceae, Bacillariophyceae, Dictyochophyceae, Eustigmatophyceae, Haptophyceae, Pelagophyceae, Pinguiophyceae, and Raphidophyceae) and chlorophyte microalgae (Euglenophyceae, Chlorarachniophyceae, Prasinophyceae, Pedinophyceae, Chlorophyceae, and Trebouxiophyceae), respectively (Table 1). PCR was performed on a thermal cycler in a reaction mixture (50.0 μl) containing 2.0 μl of template DNA, 0.2 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 1× PCR buffer, 1.5 mM Mg2+, 1.0 U of KOD-Plus, version 2 (Toyobo), that has intensive 3′ → 5′ exonuclease activity, and 1.0 μM each primer. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 15 s, at 50°C for 30 s, and at 68°C for 1 min. Results of PCR amplification were checked on 1.5% agarose gels, with ethidium staining.

PCR products were purified and concentrated using Suprec-PCR (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). Following an additional A-overhang elongation step, the purified PCR products were ligated to a pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega, Madison, WI) and then transformed into ECOS competent Escherichia coli DH5α (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan). Twenty-four white colonies were randomly chosen from each library and picked for sequencing. To check whether 24 colonies from a single D. mitra cell were enough to investigate the plastid diversity within the D. mitra cells, more than 100 white colonies were picked from a D. mitra cell (0908MUT01) and sequenced. The presence of the desired gene insert in the plasmid was verified by colony PCR with a U19 forward primer (5′-GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACG-3′) and pUC/M13 reverse primer (5′-TCACACAGGAAACAGCTATGAC-3′). DNA sequences were determined using a DYEnamic ET Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) and analyzed on a DNA sequencer (ABI 3100; Applied Biosystems). The forward and reverse sequences were aligned using GENETYX software (Genetyx Corporation), and the aligned sequences were checked against the GenBank database by using the nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTN).

Phylogenetic analysis.

Partial sequences of the nuclear 18S rRNA and plastid rbcL genes were aligned with the sequences of other related species obtained from GenBank using the Clustal W algorithm (59) by careful checking manually, and neighbor-joining (NJ) trees were generated using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software, version 4.0 (58), with the default setting. Bootstrapping with 1,000 replications was used to estimate the reliability of the phylogenetic trees. Sequences were regarded as the same operational taxonomic units (OTUs) according to McDonald et al. (31) if they had more than 99% similarity.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

Sequences obtained in this study for the nuclear 18S rRNA genes and plastid rbcL genes have been deposited in the DDBJ under the accession numbers shown in Fig. 3 to 5 for the respective genes.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

A neighbor-joining tree inferred from the analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA genes. There were 1,667 informative sites in the final data set. A sequence of D. mitra obtained in this study is highlighted in gray. Bootstrap values of >50% are given as percentage of 1,000 bootstrap replicates at the respective nodes. Prorocentrum micans was used as the outgroup. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Plastid diversity in chlorophyte microalgae detected from a D. mitra cell (0908MUT02), determined using the primer pair rbcL-F184/rbcL-R704. The tree topology is based on the neighbor-joining method and was constructed with MEGA, version 4.0. There were 447 informative sites in the final data set. The plastid rbcL sequences detected from the D. mitra cell are highlighted in gray (the Mutsu Bay sample). The numbers in parentheses refer to the total clone numbers in each OTU. Bootstrap values of >50% are given as a percentage of 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Chlorarachnion reptans was used as the outgroup. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Analysis of the nuclear 18S rRNA gene in D. mitra.

We determined the nuclear 18S rRNA gene sequences (1,740 bp) of the 14 D. mitra isolates to identify the exact species although there is no available data for this species in the GenBank at present. All the sequences matched completely and were closest to the sequence of Phalacroma rapa (Fig. 3), which is the most morphologically similar species to D. mitra, and 29 bp (including insertions/deletions of 4 bp) were different from those in the sequence of Phalacroma rapa EU780655. Phylogenetic analysis and observations of cell morphology indicated that the 14 isolated cells were certainly those of D. mitra. Using the universal primers for eukaryotic phytoplanktons, we also determined the partial nuclear 18S rRNA gene sequences in the DNA extracts of the D. mitra cells to check for any contamination by other microorganisms. No other species except D. mitra were detected in the 96 sequences detected from the 14 D. mitra cells, indicating no contamination in the DNA extracts of the D. mitra cells and no symbiotic microorganisms within the cells. In addition, these data also clearly showed that any nuclear DNAs, originated from microorganisms ingested in the food vacuoles, were not detected in the D. mitra cells.

Kleptoplastid diversity in D. mitra cells.

When we used the primer pair rbcL-F118/rbcL-R876 targeting chromophyte microalgae, a total of 292 plastid rbcL sequences (717 bp) were determined by gene cloning from the 14 cells of D. mitra, and 97 operational taxonomic units were obtained (Fig. 4 and Table 2). Namely, 76, 17, and 21 OTUs were detected from the clone libraries in Mutsu Bay (10 cells of D. mitra), Seto Inland Sea (2 cells), and Yatsushiro Sea (2 cells), respectively. Most of the plastid rbcL sequences detected from the 14 D. mitra cells were novel ones in the GenBank database and positioned within the lineage of Haptophyceae (227 sequences, 80 OTUs), particularly within the genus Chrysochromulina. Other sequences were closely related to Dictyochophyceae (14 sequences, 5 OTUs), Pelagophyceae (14 sequences, 1 OTU), Bolidophyceae (3 sequences, 1 OTU), and Bacillariophyceae (1 sequence, 1 OTU); however, 33 sequences as 9 OTUs were not closely clustered with any particular group, and therefore these OTUs were provisionally named as unknown (clade 1, clade 2, and clade 3) (Fig. 4).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Plastid diversity in chromophyte microalgae detected from natural D. mitra cells, determined using the primer pair rbcL-F118/rbcL-R876. The tree topology is based on the neighbor-joining method and was constructed with MEGA, version 4.0. There were 627 informative sites in the final data set. The plastid rbcL sequences detected from the D. mitra cells are indicated in colored letters. The numbers in parentheses refer to the total number of clones in each OTU. Bootstrap values of >50% are given as a percentage of 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Palmaria palmata was used as the outgroup. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site. *, sequence of a diatom endosymbiont in the marine dinoflagellate Peridinium quinquecorne (14).

Table 2.

Number of plastid rbcL clones sequenced in each cell

Isolation area Cell no. No. of clones assigned to:a
Total no. of clones sequenced No. of OTUs
Bolido Bacillario Dictyocho Hapto Pelago Prasino Unknown, clade 1 Unknown, clade 2 Unknown, clade 3
Mutsu Bay 0908MUT01 3 1 4 62 9 4 17 100 23
0908MUT02 22 16 1 1 40 26
0908MUT03 5 3 1 1 10 6
0908MUT04 13 1 14 13
0908MUT05 14 2 16 13
0908MUT06 4 9 13 10
0908MUT07 1 20 2 1 24 23
0908MUT08 13 13 11
0908MUT09 1 10 1 12 12
0908MUT10 1 7 1 1 1 11 10
Seto Inland Sea 0907SET01 13 13 7
0907SET02 2 12 14 11
Yatsushiro Sea 0907YAT01 15 15 12
0907YAT02 1 12 13 11
Total 3 1 14 227 14 16 7 5 21 308 102
a

Bolido, Bolidophyceae; Bacillario, Bacillariophyceae; Dictyocho, Dictyochophyceae; Hapto, Haptophyceae; Pelago, Pelagophyceae; Prasino, Prasinophyceae; Unknown, unknown algae.

About 500 species are now recognized in Haptophyceae; however, the total number of species has been estimated at ca. 2,000, which is four times those currently known (2). This implies that haptophyte diversity remains to be fully described. Recent genetic studies have suggested the existence of hidden diversity in Haptophyceae (7, 31), detecting a number of novel sequences from environmental clone libraries. Therefore, it is always possible that environmental samples contain previously undescribed species. However, we obtained four plastid rbcL sequences identical to those of Chrysochromulina simplex (Haptophyceae: Prymnesiales), Chrysochromulina hirta (Haptophyceae: Prymnesiales), Chrysochromulina sp. TKB8936 (Haptophyceae: Prymnesiales), and an unidentified diatom (Bacillariophyceae). The unidentified diatom is reported to be an endosymbiont in the marine dinoflagellate Peridinium quinquecorne (14). Nuclear 18S rRNA gene analysis indicated that the diatom species was closely related to Chaetoceros sp. (14), and plastid rbcL gene analysis showed a close phylogenetic affiliation with Chaetoceros socialis (Fig. 4).

When the primer pair rbcL-F184/rbcL-R704 was used for chlorophyte microalgae, a very thin PCR band was obtained only for the cell of D. mitra 0908MUT02. Five different OTUs from 16 plastid rbcL sequences (481 bp) were obtained (Fig. 5 and Table 2). All the OTUs were positioned within the lineage of Prasinophyceae; four of the five OTUs were positioned in the Micromonas pusilla clade, and the remaining one OTU was positioned in the Pyramimonas clade. Chlorophyte plastids appear to be markedly less abundant than chromophyte plastids in the natural D. mitra cells.

In the plastid rbcL gene analysis, 10 to 40 sequences (16.0 ± 4.9, average ± standard deviation [SD]) as 6 to 26 OTUs (13.4 ± 6.1, average ± SD) were successfully determined in 13 D. mitra cells when 24 or 48 (in the case of D. mitra 0908MUT02) white colonies were picked after cloning; these sequences were clustered into four algal classes and three unknown groups (Table 2). On the other hand, 100 sequences as 23 OTUs were detected from a single cell of D. mitra (0908MUT01) and positioned closely to six algal classes with two unknown algal groups. Comparison of these data indicates that selection of 24 white colonies was probably not good enough to cover the whole plastid diversity in a single D. mitra cell. Plastid rbcL sequences obtained from the D. mitra cells in the Mutsu Bay were widely distributed in several taxonomic groups, whereas those obtained in the Seto Inland Sea and Yatsushiro Sea were distributed only in Haptophyceae and Dictyochophyceae; this was mainly caused by differences in the numbers of D. mitra cells and sequences examined. Naturally, the diversity and composition of plastids in a D. mitra cell may vary considerably depending on individual cells and environmental conditions for the growth of D. mitra itself or the prey species.

Koike et al. (20) demonstrated that six sequences of the plastid 16S rRNA gene detected from approximately 30 cells of D. mitra were all positioned within the lineage of Haptophyceae. Moreover, we obtained in total 102 OTUs assigned to several taxonomic groups from 14 natural cells of D. mitra. Thus, we provided novel information on such a previously unknown type of kleptoplastidy in D. mitra, showing a remarkable difference from D. acuminata/D. caudata/D. fortii/D. infundibulus, whose plastids originated from only a few particular cryptophytes.

Kleptoplastidy in Dinophysis.

Nonphotosynthetic species of Dinophysis feed by myzocytosis, a process in which the peduncle (or feeding tube) sucks the cytoplasm from the prey, leaving behind the plasmalemma (11). Photosynthetic species share this structure; food vacuoles are often found in their cytoplasm, clearly indicating mixotrophy (15, 19). Recent molecular analyses of several Dinophysis species (except for D. mitra) by using plastid sequences such as psbA, 16S rRNA, and rbcL gene sequences have also showed high-level congruence of the plastid sequences among Dinophysis species and the cryptophytes Teleaulax, Geminigera, and Plagioselmis (16, 17, 35, 39, 56, 57). This has led to the suggestion that the plastid of Dinophysis might be a kleptoplastid, a temporary but functional plastid captured from a prey (16, 33, 35). In a recent study, mixotrophy in D. acuminata/D. caudata/D. fortii/D. infundibulus was clearly showed by demonstrating that Myrionecta rubra grown on Teleaulax is required as prey for propagation (8, 18, 37, 40, 41, 43, 44). Although further examples are clearly required, this evidence strongly suggests that propagation of Dinophysis species, which are regarded as mixotrophic species, depends on the predator-prey interactions occurring with M. rubra and Teleaulax/Plagioselmis/Geminigera. Observation of the sequestration process of the chloroplasts ingested from M. rubra by D. acuminata (S. Nagai, unpublished data), D. fortii (37), and D. infundibulus (41) has indicated that the chloroplasts of M. rubra are ingested and dispersed in the Dinophysis cells before the ingestion of other cell contents to prevent them from being digested in the food vacuoles, clearly showing that the ingested chloroplasts can function as kleptoplastids. Plastid DNA content of D. norvegica cells in different stages of cell division was analyzed to directly test the possibility of plastid replication in this species in order to obtain a direct evidence of whether the ingested plastids are functional as permanent plastids or are simply retained as kleptoplastids; no replication signal of plastids was detected, which strongly suggests kleptoplastidic behavior (34). In addition, monitoring of photosynthetic activities by 13C method in D. fortii without the prey ciliate after feeding heavily on M. rubra clearly indicated that the activities decreased rapidly within 1 week (S. Nagai, unpublished data). However, on the basis of TEM and laboratory culture experiments, Garcia-Cuetos et al. (8) found that several plastid features separated D. acuminata from both the cryptophyte Teleaulax amphioxeia and the ciliate M. rubra. Their interpretation of the data was that D. acuminata harbors permanent plastids of cryptophyte origin, not kleptoplastids. Therefore, it remains debatable whether the plastids of the dinoflagellate Dinophysis are temporarily sequestered (kleptoplastids) or permanently established (8, 43, 45). In this study, however, we detected more than 100 different plastid sequences from 14 D. mitra cells, which strongly suggested kleptoplastidic behavior. This would also be supported by the fact that natural D. mitra cells without plastids have occasionally been observed (20).

There has been accumulated information on kleptoplastidic dinoflagellate species and kleptoplastid diversities (Table 3). Most of the kleptoplastidic dinoflagellates seem to prefer to retain kleptoplastids derived from cryptophytes, especially Teleaulax amphioxeia, as observed in several mixotrophic Dinophysis species and Amylax species, with a few exceptions such as an unidentified Antarctic dinoflagellate that retains plastids from Phaeocystis antarctica (Haptophyta) (9) and D. mitra that retains many plastids of different origins (Fig. 4 and Table 3). Interestingly, in several dinoflagellate species such as Amylax species and Gymnodinium acidotum, cryptophycean symbionts (Teleaulax amphioxeia and Chroomonas sp.) with a nearly full complement of organelles are retained inside the cells (21, 61). However, in species such as Dinophysis species and Gymnodinium gracilentum, only plastids are retained inside the cells, and other organelles are digested soon after they are ingested, possibly showing the evolutionary process of trial and selection to utilize kleptoplastids more functionally. Members of the genus Dinophysis are perhaps in the earliest stages of plastid acquisition (10). What “benefit” do some dinoflagellate species derive from kleptoplastids? The presence of starch indicates that photosynthate is produced (29). It has been assumed that the starch produced by cryptophyte kleptoplastids is an available carbon source for the host (23, 50), implying that photosynthesis is a critical mechanism for supplementing an energy source to survive starvation periods when food is scarce. In any case, we revealed that D. mitra has the novel type of kleptoplastidy.

Table 3.

List of possible kleptoplastidic dinoflagellates and plastid origins

Dinoflagellate species Habitat Species of plastid origin Source of plastida Description of retained plastids detected by:
Reference or source
TEM PCR
Gymnodinium acidotum Freshwater Chroomonas spp. (Cryptophyceae) Direct ingestion Plastids with cytoplasm 6, 61
Amphidinium latum Marine Cryptophyceae NA Plastids with cytoplasm 13
Amphidinium poecilochroum Marine Chroomonas (Cryptophyceae) Direct ingestion Plastids with cytoplasm 22
Amylax buxus Marine Teleaulax amphioxeia (Cryptophyceae) NA Plastids with cytoplasm 21
Amylax triacantha Marine Teleaulax amphioxeia (Cryptophyceae) NA Plastids with cytoplasm 21
Cryptoperidiniopsis sp. Marine (estuary) Storeatula major (Cryptophyceae) Direct ingestion Plastids 5
Dinophysis acuminata Marine Geminigera criophila (Cryptophyceae) NA Plastids 57
Dinophysis acuminata Marine Teleaulax amphioxeia (Cryptophyceae) M. rubra Plastids 16
Dinophysis acuminata Marine Teleaulax amphioxeia (Cryptophyceae) M. rubra Plastids S. Nagai, unpublished data
Dinophysis acuta Marine Geminigera criophila (Cryptophyceae) NA Plastids 57
Dinophysis caudata Marine Teleaulax amphioxeia (Cryptophyceae) M. rubra Plastids 45
Dinophysis fortii Marine Geminigera criophila (Cryptophyceae) NA Plastids 57
Dinophysis fortii Marine Teleaulax amphioxeia (Cryptophyceae) M. rubra Plastids 35
Dinophysis fortii Marine Teleaulax amphioxeia (Cryptophyceae) M. rubra Plastids 37
Dinophysis infundibulus Marine Teleaulax amphioxeia (Cryptophyceae) M. rubra Plastids 40
Dinophysis norvegica Marine Geminigera criophila (Cryptophyceae) NA Plastids 57
Dinophysis norvegica Marine Teleaulax amphioxeia (Cryptophyceae) M. rubra Plastids 16, 34
Dinophysis tripos Marine Teleaulax amphioxeia (Cryptophyceae) M. rubra Plastids T. Kamiyama, unpublished data
Dinophysis mitra Marine Haptophyceae NA Plastids 20
Dinophysis mitra Marine Bacillariophyceae Unknown ciliates Plastids This study
Dinophysis mitra Marine Bolidophyceae Unknown ciliates Plastids This study
Dinophysis mitra Marine Dictyochophyceae Unknown ciliates Plastids This study
Dinophysis mitra Marine Haptophyceae Unknown ciliates Plastids This study
Dinophysis mitra Marine Pelagophyceae Unknown ciliates Plastids This study
Dinophysis mitra Marine Prasinophyceae Unknown ciliates Plastids This study
Gymnodinium aeruginosum Marine Cryptophyceae Direct ingestion Plastids with cytoplasm 51, 52
Gymnodinium gracilentum Marine Rhodomonas salina (Cryptophyceae) Direct ingestion Plastids 53
Pfiesteria piscicida Marine (estuary) Rhodomonas sp. (Cryptophyceae) Direct ingestion Plastids 29
Unidentified dinoflagellate (W5-1) Marine Phaeocystis antarctica (Haptophyceae) Direct ingestion Plastids with nucleus 9
Unidentified dinoflagellate (RS24) Marine Phaeocystis antarctica (Haptophyceae) Direct ingestion Plastids with nucleus 9
a

Unknown ciliates were detected from another specimen of Dinophysis mitra, indicating the mixotrophy of D. mitra and sequestration of plastids through ingestions of ciliate prey. NA, not available.

Origin of plastids in D. mitra.

Photosynthetic Dinophysis species generally contain plastids of cryptophyte origin; however, D. mitra cells show red fluorescent, non-phycoerythrin-containing plastids, indicating that the plastids are not of cryptophyte origin (Fig. 1). The molecular phylogenetic position of D. mitra, inferred from the plastid sequences, indicates that the D. mitra plastid is originated mainly of haptophytes. This is also supported by the morphological features of the plastids as observed using TEM; however, no other organelles such as nuclei and Golgi bodies were observed (20). Measurements of photosynthetic activity by 14C incorporation method clearly showed the activity in the retained plastids, and analysis of the plastid 16S rRNA gene revealed heterogeneity in the sequences of six clones obtained from different D. mitra cells, which strongly suggests that the kleptoplastidy originated from several haptophyte species (20).

The presence of food vacuoles has been confirmed in natural D. mitra cells (20, 42), indicating predation of some unknown prey organisms by myzocytosis. In this study, we obtained more than 100 different plastid sequences from 14 cells of D. mitra; these sequences were assigned to several microalgal classes such as Bolidophyceae, Bacillariophyceae, Dictyochophyceae, Haptophyceae, Pelagophyceae, and Prasinophyceae. This suggests that D. mitra is a unique dinoflagellate, which can easily acquire functional plastids from many and different microalgal origins by feeding on several ciliate prey species, in comparison with other Dinophysis species possessing kleptoplastids, originating from only one or two particular cryptophytes obtained by ingestion of a ciliate prey, M. rubra.

It is well known that the ciliates Laboea, Strombidium, and Tontonia retain hundreds of plastids (symbiotic plastids) (24, 25, 26, 27, 55) from different origins, i.e., Chrysophyceae, Bacillariophyceae, Dinophyceae, Euglenophyceae, Haptophyceae, and Ulvophyceae, as inferred on the basis of cytological characteristics observed by TEM (25, 27, 55) and PCR (32). Plastids are always situated at the periphery of ciliate cells and not surrounded by the dense endoplasmic reticulum (i.e., present outside the digestive system) to be retained and utilized as functional plastids (27). Our data strongly suggest mixotrophy in D. mitra, which requires prey such as Laboea, Tontonia, and Strombidium-like ciliates for its propagation and carries out the sequestration of robbed plastids, in a manner similar to that of other Dinophysis species (37, 41). Establishing laboratory cultures would also further understanding of the ecophysiology and toxicology of toxic dinoflagellate species.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI, number 20380116) and a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (KAKENHI, number 21780191).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 18 November 2011

REFERENCES

  • 1. Abé TH. 1967. The armored Dinoflagellata: II. Prorocentridae and dinophysidae (B)—Dinophysis and its allied genera. Publ. Seto Mar. Biol. Lab. 15:37–78 [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Andersen RA. 1992. Diversity of eukaryotic algae. Biodivers. Conserv. 1:267–292 [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Archibald JM, Keeling PJ. 2004. The evolutionary history of plastids: a molecular phylogenetic perspective, p 55–74 In Hirt RP, Horner DS. (ed), Organelles, genomes, and eukaryote phylogeny: an evolutionary synthesis in the age of genomics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Elbrächter M. 1991. Food uptake mechanisms in phagotrophic dinoflagellates and classification, p 303–312 In Patterson DJ, Larsen J. (ed), The biology of free-living heterotrophic flagellates. Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Eriksen NT, Hayes KC, Lewitus AJ. 2002. Growth responses of the mixotrophic dinoflagellates, Cryptoperidiniopsis sp. and Pfiesteria piscicida, to light under prey-saturated conditions. Harmful Algae 1:191–203 [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fields SD, Rhodes RG. 1991. Ingestion and retention of Chroomonas spp. (Cryptophyceae) by Gymnodinium acidotum (Dinophyceae). J. Phycol. 27:525–529 [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Fuller NJ, et al. 2006. Analysis of photosynthetic picoeukaryote diversity at open ocean sites in the Arabian Sea using a PCR biased towards marine algal plastids. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 43:79–93 [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Garcia-Cuetos L, Moestrup Ø, Hansen PJ, Daugbjerg N. 2010. The toxic dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata harbors permanent chloroplasts of cryptomonad origin, not kleptochloroplasts. Harmful Algae 9:25–38 [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Gast RJ, Moran DM, Dennett MR, Caron DA. 2007. Kleptoplasty in an Antarctic dinoflagellate: caught in evolutionary transition? Environ. Microbiol. 9:39–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hackett JD, Anderson DM, Erdner DL, Bhattacharya D. 2004. Dinoflagellates: a remarkable evolutionary experiment. Am. J. Bot. 91:1523–1534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hansen PJ. 1991. Dinophysis: a planktonic dinoflagellate genus which can act both as a prey and a predator of a ciliate. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 69:201–204 [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Horiguchi T. 2006. Algae and their chloroplasts with particular reference to the dinoflagellates. Paleontol. Res. 10:299–309 [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Horiguchi T, Pienaar RN. 1992. Amphidinium latum Lebour (Dinophyceae), a sand-dwelling dinoflagellate feeding on cryptomonads. Jpn. J. Phycol. 40:353–363 [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Horiguchi T, Takano Y. 2006. Serial replacement of a diatom endosymbiont in the marine dinoflagellate Peridinium quinquecorne (Peridiniales, Dinophyceae). Phycol. Res. 54:193–200 [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Jacobson DM, Andersen RA. 1994. The discovery of mixotrophy in photosynthetic species of Dinophysis (Dinophyceae): light and electron microscopical observations of food vacuoles in Dinophysis acuminata, D. norvegica and two heterotrophic dinophysoid dinoflagellates. Phycologia 33:97–110 [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Janson S. 2004. Molecular evidence that plastids in the toxin-producing dinoflagellate genus Dinophysis originate from the free-living cryptophyte Teleaulax amphioxeia. Environ. Microbiol. 6:1102–1106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Janson S, Granéli E. 2003. Genetic analysis of the psbA gene from single cells indicates a cryptomonad origin of the plastid in Dinophysis (Dinophyceae). Phycologia 42:473–477 [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kamiyama T, Suzuki T. 2009. Production of dinophysistoxin-1 and pectenotoxin-2 by a culture of Dinophysis acuminata (Dinophyceae). Harmful Algae 8:312–317 [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Koike K, Koike K, Takagi M, Ogata T, Ishimaru T. 2000. Evidence of phagotrophy in Dinophysis fortii (Dinophysiales, Dinophyceae), a dinoflagellate that causes diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP). Phycol. Res. 48:121–124 [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Koike K, et al. 2005. A novel type of kleptoplastidy in Dinophysis (Dinophyceae): presence of haptophyte-type plastid in Dinophysis mitra. Protist 156:225–237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Koike K, Takishita K. 2008. Anucleated cryptophyte vestiges in the gonyaulacalean dinoflagellates Amylax buxus and Amylax triacantha (Dinophyceae). Phycol. Res. 56:301–311 [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Larsen J. 1988. An ultrastructural study of Amphidinium poecilochroum (Dinophyceae), a phagotrophic dinoflagellate feeding on small species of cryptophytes. Phycologia 27:366–377 [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Larsen J. 1992. Endocytobiotic consortia with dinoflagellate hosts, p 427–442 In Reisser W. (ed), Algae and symbioses: plants, animals, fungi, viruses, interactions explored. Biopress, Ltd., Bristol, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Laval-Peuto M. 1992. Plastidic protozoa, p 471–499 In Reisser W. (ed), Algae and symbioses: plants, animals, fungi, viruses, interactions explored. Biopress, Ltd., Bristol, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Laval-Peuto M, Febvre M. 1986. On plastid symbiosis in Tontonia appendiculariformis (Ciliophora, Oligotrichina). Biosystems 19:137–158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Laval-Peuto M, Rassoulzadegan F. 1988. Autofluorescence of marine planktonic Oligotrichina and other ciliates. Hydrobiologia 159:99–110 [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Laval-Peuto M, Salvano P, Gayol P, Greuet C. 1986. Mixotrophy in marine planktonic ciliates: ultrastructural study of Tontonia appendiculariformis (Ciliophora, Oligotrichina). Mar. Microb. Food Webs 1:81–104 [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Lee JS, et al. 1989. Determination of diarrhetic shellfish toxins in various dinoflagellate species. J. Appl. Phycol. 1:147–152 [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lewitus AJ, Glasgow HB, Jr, Burkholder JM. 1999. Kleptoplastidy in the toxic dinoflagellate Pfiesteria piscicida (Dinophyceae). J. Phycol. 35:303–312 [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Maestrini SY. 1998. Bloom dynamics and ecophysiology of Dinophysis spp., p 243–265 In Anderson DM, Cembella AD, Hallegraeff GM. (ed), Physiological ecology of harmful algal blooms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany [Google Scholar]
  • 31. McDonald SM, Sarno D, Scanlan DJ, Zingone A. 2007. Genetic diversity of eukaryotic ultraphytoplankton in the Gulf of Naples during an annual cycle. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 50:75–89 [Google Scholar]
  • 32. McManus GB, Zhang H, Lin S. 2004. Marine planktonic ciliates that prey on macroalgae and enslave their chloroplasts. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49:308–313 [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Melkonian M. 1996. Phylogeny of photosynthetic protists and their plastids. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 89:71–96 [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Minnhagen S, Carvalho WF, Salomon PS, Janson S. 2008. Chloroplast DNA content in Dinophysis (Dinophyceae) from different cell cycle stages is consistent with kleptoplasty. Environ. Microbiol. 10:2411–2417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Minnhagen S, Janson S. 2006. Genetic analyses of Dinophysis spp. support kleptoplastidy. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 57:47–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Nagai S, Matsuyama Y, Takayama H, Kotani Y. 2002. Morphology of Polykrikos kofoidii and P. schwartzii (Dinophyceae, Polykrikaceae) cysts obtained in culture. Phycologia 41:319–327 [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Nagai S, Nishitani G, Tomaru Y, Sakiyama S, Kamiyama T. 2008. Predation by the toxic dinoflagellate Dinophysis fortii on the ciliate Myrionecta rubra and observation of sequestration of ciliate chloroplasts. J. Phycol. 44:909–922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Nishitani G, Miyamura K, Imai I. 2003. Trying to cultivation of Dinophysis caudata (Dinophyceae) and the appearance of small cells. Plankton Biol. Ecol. 50:31–36 [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Nishitani G, et al. 2010. High-level congruence of Myrionecta rubra prey and Dinophysis species plastid identities as revealed by genetic analyses of isolates from Japanese coastal waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:2791–2798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Nishitani G, Nagai S, Sakiyama S, Kamiyama T. 2008. Successful cultivation of the toxic dinoflagellate Dinophysis caudata (Dinophyceae). Plankton Benthos Res. 3:78–85 [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Nishitani G, et al. 2008. Growth characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of the marine dinoflagellate Dinophysis infundibulus (Dinophyceae). Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 52:209–221 [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Nishitani G, Sugioka H, Imai I. 2002. Seasonal distribution of species of the toxic dinoflagellate genus Dinophysis in Maizuru Bay (Japan), with comments on their autofluorescence and attachment of picophytoplankton. Harmful Algae 1:253–264 [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Park MG, Kim M, Kim S, Yih W. 2010. Does Dinophysis caudata (Dinophyceae) have permanent plastids? J. Phycol. 46:236–242 [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Park MG, et al. 2006. First successful culture of the marine dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 45:101–106 [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Park MG, Park JS, Kim M, Yih W. 2008. Plastid dynamics during survival of Dinophysis caudata without its ciliate prey. J. Phycol. 44:1154–1163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Raven JA. 1997. Phagotrophy in phototrophs. Limnol. Oceanogr. 42:198–205 [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Richlen ML, Barber PH. 2005. A technique for the rapid extraction of microalgal DNA from single live and preserved cells. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5:688–691 [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Sampayo MAde M. 1993. Trying to cultivate Dinophysis spp., p 807–810 In Smayda TJ, Shimizu Y. (ed), Toxic phytoplankton blooms in the sea. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Schnepf E. 1993. From prey via endosymbiont to plastid: comparative studies in dinoflagellates, p 53–76 In Lewin RA. (ed), Origins of plastids: symbiogenesis, prochlorophytes, and the origins of chloroplasts. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Schnepf E, Elbrächter M. 1992. Nutritional strategies in dinoflagellates. A review with emphasis on cell biological aspects. Eur. J. Protistol. 28:3–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Schnepf E, Elbrächter M. 1999. Dinophyte chloroplasts and phylogeny—a review. Grana 38:81–97 [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Schnepf E, Winter S, Mollenhauer D. 1989. Gymnodinium aeruginosum (Dinophyta): a blue-green dinoflagellate with a vestigial, anucleate, cryptophycean endosymbiont. Plant Syst. Evol. 164:75–91 [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Skovgaard A. 1998. Role of chloroplast retention in a marine dinoflagellate. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 15:293–301 [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Stoebe B, Maier U-G. 2002. One, two, three: nature's tool box for building plastids. Protoplasma 219:123–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Stoecker DK, Silver MW, Michaels AE, Davis LH. 1988. Obligate mixotrophy in Laboea strobila, a ciliate which retains chloroplasts. Mar. Biol. 99:415–423 [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Takahashi Y, et al. 2005. Development of molecular probes for Dinophysis (Dinophyceae) plastid: a tool to predict blooming and explore plastid origin. Mar. Biotechnol. 7:95–103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Takishita K, Koike K, Maruyama T, Ogata T. 2002. Molecular evidence for plastid robbery (kleptoplastidy) in Dinophysis, a dinoflagellate causing diarrhetic shellfish poisoning. Protist 153:293–302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:1596–1599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673–4680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Uchida T, Kamiyama T, Matsuyama Y. 1997. Predation by a photosynthetic dinoflagellate Gyrodinium instriatum on loricated ciliates. J. Plankton Res. 19:603–608 [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Wilcox LW, Wedemayer GJ. 1984. Gymnodinium acidotum Nygaard (Pyrrophyta), a dinoflagellate with an endosymbiotic cryptomonad. J. Phycol. 20:236–242 [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Wilcox LW, Wedemayer GJ. 1985. Dinoflagellate with blue-green chloroplasts derived from an endosymbiotic eukaryote. Science 227:192–194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Yasumoto T, et al. 1980. Identification of Dinophysis fortii as the causative organism of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 46:1405–1411 [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Yasumoto T, Oshima Y, Yamaguchi M. 1978. Occurrence of a new type of shellfish poisoning in the Tohoku district. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 44:1249–1255 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES