Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2012 Feb;50(2):483–487. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06155-11

Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay and Melting Curve Analysis for Identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex and Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

Jeong-Uk Kim 1,, Choong-Hwan Cha 1, Hae-Kyong An 1
PMCID: PMC3264165  PMID: 22162553

Abstract

A multiplex real-time PCR assay and melting curve analysis for identifying 23 mycobacterial species was developed and evaluated using 77 reference strains and 369 clinical isolates. Concordant results were obtained for all 189 (100%) isolates of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and 169 (93.9%) isolates of nontuberculous mycobacteria. Our results showed that this multiplex real-time PCR assay is an effective tool for the mycobacterial identification from cultures.

TEXT

In South Korea, tuberculosis remains a serious public health problem, although its incidence rate has been greatly reduced (33). Recently, the isolation of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) from clinical specimens has increased, and NTM now comprises 10 to 30% of isolated mycobacteria (11, 14, 15, 17, 27, 29). Mycobacteria have a spectrum of virulence and different susceptibilities to antibiotics (5, 6, 7, 10, 32). Thus, it is very important to rapidly distinguish NTM from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and identify the species to administer the appropriate treatment (6, 28). Commercial kits that use various molecularly based technologies, like line probe hybridization and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphisms, have been used to rapidly identify mycobacteria (4, 12, 16, 20, 24, 25, 26). Despite their simplicity, these tests require postamplification procedures and are prone to contamination. In addition, they are suited for small test volumes, but they are too costly for routine use in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Alternatively, the sequencing of 16S rRNA genes or other targets offers a rapid and reliable means of mycobacterial identification; however, this requires expensive instrumentation (2, 21, 34). In recent years, real-time PCR instruments have been employed in many clinical laboratories in South Korea. Real-time PCR technology does not require postamplification manipulation. Furthermore, amplicons can be detected by melting curve analysis without using costly fluorescent probes. To address the need for a simple, cost-effective molecular method, we developed a multiplex real-time PCR assay that uses a melting curve analysis without fluorescent probes. Here, we applied this method to routine identification of cultured mycobacterial isolates.

The efficacy of a multiplex real-time PCR assay was evaluated using 77 bacterial reference strains and 369 clinical isolates. The assay was initially validated with 69 mycobacterial reference strains and 8 reference strains closely related to mycobacteria (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Then, we tested the 369 clinical isolates, including 189 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) isolates and 180 NTM isolates grown in Bactec MGIT 960 culture tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) or on 3% Ogawa medium.

Template DNAs were prepared from different culture media. Several colonies growing on 3% Ogawa medium were harvested with a 1-μl loop and suspended in 0.5 ml of distilled water. MGIT culture medium (0.5 ml) was centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 3 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml of distilled water. Both sample types were heated in a boiling water bath for 10 min and centrifuged for 3 min. The supernatant was used in the real-time PCR, sequencing, and GenoType Mycobacterium assays.

All MTC isolates were identified with the BioSewoom Real Time PCR assay for tuberculosis (TB) cultures (BioSewoom, Seoul, South Korea). Of the 180 NTM isolates, 96 species were identified with the GenoType Mycobacterium assay (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany), and 84 species were identified with 16S rRNA sequencing. The NTM species that had been discrepant between the GenoType assay or 16S rRNA sequencing and the real-time PCR assay were identified with the 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer (ITS) gene sequencing.

Sequencing of the 16S rRNA and ITS genes was performed as described previously (9). The sequences were identified by comparisons with genes in the GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/GenBank/index.html) and the Ribosomal Differentiation of Medical Microorganisms (RIDOM) database (http://rdna.ridom.de/). The GenoType Mycobacterium assay was conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions.

The 16S rRNA gene, the 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer (ITS), and the hsp65 gene sequences were aligned with Sequencher 4.10 software (Gene Codes Co., Ann Arbor, MI). Based on sequence alignment, we identified regions of difference that would specifically amplify different targets of interest. The target gene for MTC was the insertion sequence IS6110. Primers were designed manually or with the Primer 3 program (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/). The real-time PCR primers for the identification of mycobacterial species, their target genes, and their melting temperatures (Tm) are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Multiplex real-time PCR primers for the identification of mycobacteria

Primer mixturea Primer target Target geneb Sequence(5′→3′) Tm (°C)c
I M. gastri ITS GGGCTTGTCTTGGACTCGT 75.13 ± 0.11
TGGTGGGACAACACTCTTGG
M. xenopi ITS GTTGGGCAGCAGGCAGTA 80.97 ± 0.43
GTTGCCTCAAAACCCAACAG
M. fortuitum ITS CCCGAGCCGTGAGGAAC 81.65 ± 0.26
CAATAGTGTGTCTGGCAGTCAAAA
MTC IS6110 CGAACTCAAGGAGCACATCAG 84.47 ± 0.41
CAGGGTTAGCCACACTTTGC
NTM 16S rRNA ATGTYTTSTGGKGSAAAGCTTT 88.14 ± 0.51
GTAGGAGTCTGGGCCGTA
II M. abscessus ITS ATGAACTAGGGAACATAAAGTATGCA 72.72 ± 0.74
AGGATTTACAAAACATATTCACCAAGT
M. intracellulare 16S rRNA GGTCTAATACCGGATAGGACCTTTAG 75.38 ± 0.31
GCAAAAGCTTTCCACCAAA
M. szulgai ITS GGTCCTGAGGCAACACTCA 80.00 ± 0.42
CCAAGATGGTGGGACAACAG
M. terrae ITS GATTCCCCCGTACCTCACAT 83.09 ± 0.33
ACCACCGACCACCCACTAC
III M. avium 16S rRNA GGGTCTAATACCGGATAGGACCT 73.55 ± 0.34
CGCAAAAGCTTTCCACCAGA
M. chelonae ITS TGTCCACCCCGTGGATA 79.40 ± 0.25
GTGCCAGCGTTTCAATTCTA
M. kansasii/M. gastri 16S rRNA CGGAAAGGTCTCTTCGGAGAC 81.42 ± 0.20
TTTCCCAGGCTTATCCTGGT
M. gordonae ITS TGCAAGCCTTGAGTGGTCA 84.04 ± 0.33
GGGGACAGCACCAGAGG
IV M. marinum/M. ulcerans ITS GGGTCCTGAGGCAACATCT 74.34 ± 0.36
CAACATCCCGAAACCAACAG
M. simiae ITS CTCGGCCGACTTCGGTT 76.34 ± 0.22
AGATGGAGGGACACCACTTCA
M. ulcerans hsp65 ACCGAGACCCTGCTCAAA 79.03 ± 0.41
GCTCCTTGGTCTCGACCTCT
M. septicum ITS ATGGCCTCGCACCTGTAG 81.56 ± 0.25
CCAATAGTGTGTCTGGCAGTTCTA
M. smegmatis ITS GAGCTGGAGCGCTGTAGTG 84.28 ± 0.14
GAAACAGCGTTTCCCACAC
V M. scrofulaceum 16S rRNA ACCATCGACGAAGGCTCAC 77.48 ± 0.41
CACCTACCGTCAACCCACA
M. haemophilum ITS GCACAACAGCAAATGAATCG 80.77 ± 0.06
ACATGGGACAAGCCTGAGT
M. celatum ITS CACGAAAAACACTCCGCATC 85.85 ± 0.27
GCGATTTTTCCCATTTGTTG
VI M. peregrinum ITS ATTCGTTGGATGGCCTCAC 81.62 ± 0.07
CCACGCCAAGTTTGTTGAG
M. mucogenicum ITS CATTTACATGCCCTGATCCA 83.44 ± 0.29
CGACGACAATCCCAACCA
M. shimoidei ITS GAAGTCGAGCCGTGAGGA 86.87 ± 0.33
ACCACCAAAGATGAGGCAAC
a

We created six primer mixtures. Mixture I had primer sets specific for M. gastri, M. xenopi, M. fortuitum, MTC, and NTM. Mixture II had primer sets specific for M. abscessus, M. intracellulare, M. szulgai, and M. terrae. Mixture III had primer sets specific for M. avium, M. chelonae, M. kansasii, and M. gordonae. Mixture IV had primer sets specific for M. marinum, M. simiae, M. ulcerans, M. septicum, and M. smegmatis. Mixture V had primer sets specific for M. scrofulaceum, M. haemophilum, and M. celatum. Mixture VI had primer sets specific for M. peregrinum, M. mucogenicum, and M. shimoidei.

b

ITS, 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer.

c

The product Tm values represent means ± coefficient of variation.

PCRs were conducted with the Rotor-gene Q real-time PCR instrument (Qiagen Inc., Germantown, MD). The PCR mixture contained 0.5 μl of 10 μM multiplexed primer mix (Table 1), 5 μl of 2× HRM PCR master mix (Qiagen Inc., Germantown, MD) including EvaGreen fluorescent dye, and 1.5 μl of template DNA in a total volume of 10 μl. The PCR protocol started at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 15 s; then we measured green fluorescence. Following the last cycle, the melting curve was generated by heating from 68°C to 93°C in increments of 0.2°C/s.

Based largely on the frequency and distribution of NTM isolates in South Korea (11, 14, 29, 33), we developed a multiplex real-time PCR assay with melting curve analysis that could identify 23 mycobacterial species. For the correct identification of mycobacteria, the assay was designed to distinguish between any two species that had at least a 2°C difference in the Tm values. The criterion used to make the call of species was a Tm of ±0.6°C. The specificities of six primer mixtures were initially evaluated by performing melting curve analyses on amplicons obtained from 77 bacterial reference strains. Only the expected PCR products were amplified from each reference strain (data not shown; see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). However, DNA templates from M. alvei produced a peak that corresponded to M. peregrinum in reaction VI.

The multiplex real-time PCR assay was conducted stepwise to enhance its cost-effectiveness. Step 1 was designed to differentiate between MTC and NTM; because tuberculosis is the most frequent mycobacterial infection in South Korea (11, 14, 15, 17, 27, 29), this reduced the number of species identifications necessary in steps 2 and 3. The step 1 reaction was conducted with primer mixture I. All 189 MTC isolates were correctly identified. A total of 177 of the NTM isolates were detected as NTM, and 3 (1.7%) were identified at the species level as M. fortuitum. The step 2 reaction, which included primer mixtures II and III, was conducted to identify the remaining 177 NTM species. This reaction identified 168 (93.3%) NTM species. The step 3 reaction, which included the remaining primer mixtures, identified another 8 (4.4%) NTM species. Of the total 180, only one (0.6%) M. celatum remained unidentified.

The results for 11 isolates were discordant with results from 16S rRNA sequencing (five species [Table 2]) and the GenoType assay (six species [Table 3]). The discrepant isolates except one M. celatum were further analyzed with ITS sequencing. One M. avium isolate identified with 16S rRNA sequencing was identified as M. intracellulare; similarly, three M. fortuitum/M. farcinogenes/M. senegalense isolates were identified as M. conceptionense. Furthermore, one M. fortuitum isolate identified with the GenoType assay was identified as M. septicum; the rest of the species were unidentified due to their having mixed sequences.

Table 2.

Comparison of multiplex real-time PCR results with 16S rRNA sequencing results for identification of 84 nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) isolates

Species identification by real-time PCR No. of isolates identified by16S rRNA sequencing as:
M. abscessus/M. chelonae M. avium M. celatum M. intracellulare M. fortuitum M. fortuitum/M. farcinogenes/M. senegalense M. gordonae M. kansasii/M. gastri M. septicum/M. peregrinum M. terrae
M. abscessus 6
M. avium 22 1a
M. chelonae 1
M. intracellulare 1 38
M. fortuitum 1 1
M. gordonae 1
M. kansasii 2
M. septicum 3 2
M. peregrinum 1
M. terrae 3
NTM species 1
a

This is a mixed culture of M. avium and M. intracellulare identified by the multiplex real-time PCR assay.

Table 3.

Comparison of multiplex real-time PCR results with GenoType Mycobacterium assay results for identification of 96 nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) isolates

Species identification by real-time PCR No. of isolates identified by GenoType Mycobacterium assay as:
M. abscessus M. avium M. intracellulare M. fortuitum M. gordonae M. kansasii M. smegmatis NTM species
M. abscessus 12
M. avium 30 1
M. intracellulare 1 41 1 1a
M. fortuitum 1
M. gordonae 3
M. kansasii 2
M. septicum 1
M. peregrinum 1
M. terrae 1
a

This is a mixed culture of M. avium and M. intracellulare identified by the multiplex real-time PCR assay.

The developed multiplex real-time PCR assay has distinct advantages over the 16S rRNA sequence analysis and the GenoType Mycobacterium assay. Due to the sequence similarities, 16S rRNA sequencing analysis cannot always distinguish between closely related species, including M. abscessus and M. chelonae, M. kansasii and M. gastri, M. marinum and M. ulcerans, and M. alvei, M. septicum, M. peregrinum, and M. senegalense (1, 8, 31). These species typically require additional biochemical or other tests for identification. In contrast, most of our primers were designed based on targeting the ITS gene, which had greater sequence variation than the 16S rRNA gene (22). Thus, our multiplex assay could differentiate between most of those species without additional tests. However, we could not distinguish between M. alvei and M. peregrinum. To our knowledge, M. alvei has never been isolated from clinical specimens in South Korea. Accordingly, we did not design primers to specifically identify this species.

Another advantage of our assay over sequencing analysis was that it could directly identify mycobacteria from primary liquid detection media (in MGIT culture tubes). For accurate identification, sequencing analysis typically requires pure isolates, which are grown in subcultures secondary to the primary liquid detection media. In our evaluation study, we conducted 16S rRNA sequencing on isolates directly derived from primary liquid detection media. A total of 161 isolates were determined to be positive for acid-fast bacilli (AFB), but only 84 species could be identified due to mixed sequences. In contrast, our multiplex PCR assay determined that all 161 of the isolates were NTM, and we could identify each of the species (data not shown). The GenoType assay could also identify isolates directly from primary liquid detection media, but it lacked specificity compared to our multiplex analysis. The GenoType assay did not distinguish M. septicum and M. peregrinum from M. fortuitum. In this study, three isolates that were identified as M. fortuitum/M. farcinogenes/M. senegalense by 16S rRNA sequencing were identified as M. fortuitum with the GenoType assay (data not shown). Thus, the GenoType assay could not distinguish M. farcinogenes and M. senegalense from M. fortuitum or M. septicum and M. alvei from M. peregrinum (2, 26). Furthermore, the GenoType assay could not identify M. terrae, which has been isolated in South Korea (11, 29).

Several real-time PCR assays have previously been described for mycobacterial identification (3, 13, 18, 19, 23, 30). However, most of those assays were limited in the range of species they could identify. Lim et al. (19) described a real-time PCR assay that could identify 18 mycobacterial species, but there were drawbacks in its applicability to routine identification of cultured isolates. They used 21 pairs of hybridization probes, which made the assay expensive. Furthermore, they did not validate the method with clinical isolates, and they could not differentiate between the following species pairs: M. kansasii and M. gastri, M. fortuitum and M. peregrinum, M. ulcerans and M. marinum. On the other hand, the multiplex real-time PCR assay developed here was a simple, cost-effective, appropriate test for routine identification of most clinically important mycobacterial species in culture.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the 2010 Gangneung Asan Hospital Biomedical Research Center Promotion Fund.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 7 December 2011.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jcm.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Brown-Elliott BA, Wallace RJ., Jr 2002. Clinical and taxonomic status of pathogenic nonpigmented or late-pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:716–746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Daley P, et al. 2008. Comparison of in-house and commercial 16S rRNA sequencing with high-performance liquid chromatography and genotype AS and CM for identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 61:284–293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Foongladda S, Pholwat S, Eampokalap B, Kiratisin P, Sutthent R. 2009. Multi-probe real-time PCR identification of common Mycobacterium species in blood culture broth. J. Mol. Diagn. 11:42–48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gitti Z, et al. 2006. Use of the GenoType Mycobacterium CM and AS assays to analyze 76 nontuberculous mycobacterial isolates from Greece. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:2244–2246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Glassroth J. 2008. Pulmonary disease due to nontuberculous mycobacteria. Chest 133:243–251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gopinath K, Singh S. 2010. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria in TB-endemic countries: are we neglecting the danger? PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 4:e615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Griffith DE. 2010. Nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 23:185–190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Han XY, Pham AS, Tarrand JJ, Sood PK, Luthra R. 2002. Rapid and accurate identification of mycobacteria by sequencing hypervariable regions of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 118:796–801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Harmsen D, Rothganger J, Singer C, Albert J, Frosch M. 1999. Intuitive hypertext-based molecular identification of micro-organisms. Lancet 353:291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jarzembowski JA, Young MB. 2008. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 132:1333–1341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jeong J, Kim SR, Chang CL, Lee SH. 2008. Identification of mycobacteria species by HPLC and species distribution during five years at Ulsan university hospital. Korean J. Lab. Med. 28:24–33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim BJ, et al. 2001. Differentiation of mycobacterial species by PCR-restriction analysis of DNA (342 base pairs) of the RNA polymerase gene (rpoB). J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2102–2109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim KJ, et al. 2010. Development and application of multiprobe real-time PCR method targeting the hsp65 gene for differentiation of Mycobacterium species from isolates and sputum specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:3073–3080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koh WJ, et al. 2003. Recovery rate of nontuberculous mycobacteria from acid-fast-bacilli smear-positive specimens. Tuberc. Respir. Dis. 54:22–32 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Koh WJ, et al. 2006. Clinical significance of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from respiratory specimens in Korea. Chest 129:341–348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee H, Park HJ, Cho SN, Bai GH, Kim SJ. 2000. Species identification of mycobacteria by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism of the rpoB gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2966–2971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee JY, et al. 2005. Recovery rate and characteristics of nontuberculous mycobacterial isolates in a university hospital in Korea. Tuberc. Respir. Dis. 58:385–391 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Leung KL, et al. 2009. Development of a simple and low-cost real-time PCR method for the identification of commonly encountered mycobacteria in a high throughput laboratory. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107:1433–1439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lim SY, Kim BJ, Lee MK, Kim K. 2008. Development of a real-time PCR-based method for rapid differential identification of Mycobacterium species. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 46:101–106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Makinen J, Marjamaki M, Marttila H, Soini H. 2006. Evaluation of a novel strip test, GenoType Mycobacterium CM/AS, for species identification of mycobacterial cultures. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12:481–483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McNabb A, Adie K, Rodrigues M, Black WA, Isaac-Renton J. 2006. Direct identification of mycobacteria in primary liquid detection media by partial sequencing of the 65-kilodalton heat shock protein gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:60–66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ngan GJY, Ng LM, Jureen R, Lin RTP, Teo JWP. 2011. Development of multiplex PCR assays based on the 16S–23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer for the detection of clinically relevant nontuberculous mycobacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 52:546–554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Richardson ET, Samson D, Banaei N. 2009. Rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria by multiplex, real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:1497–1502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Richter E, Rusch-Gerdes S, Hillemann D. 2006. Evaluation of the GenoType Mycobacterium assay for identification of mycobacterial species from cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:1769–1775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ruiz P, Gutierrez J, Zerolo FJ, Casal M. 2002. GenoType Mycobacterium assay for identification of mycobacterial species isolated from human clinical samples by using liquid medium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3076–3078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Russo C, Tortoli E, Menichella D. 2006. Evaluation of the new GenoType Mycobacterium assay for identification of mycobacterial species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:334–339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ryoo SW, et al. 2008. Spread of nontuberculous mycobacteria from 1993 to 2006 in Koreans. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 22:415–420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shenai S, Rodrigues C, Mehta A. 2010. Time to identify and define non-tuberculous mycobacteria in a tuberculosis-endemic region. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 14:1001–1008 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shin S, Kim EC, Yoon JH. 2006. Identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria by sequence analysis of the 16S ribosomal RNA, the heat-shock protein 65 and the RNA polymerase β-subunit genes. Korean J. Lab. Med. 26:153–160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shrestha NK, et al. 2003. Detection and differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial isolates by real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5121–5126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tortoli E. 2003. Impact of genotypic studies on mycobacterial taxonomy: the new mycobacteria of the 1990s. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16:319–354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tortoli E. 2009. Clinical manifestations of nontuberculous mycobacteria infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15:906–910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.World Health Organization 2010. Global tuberculosis control report 2010. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yam WC, et al. 2006. Diagnostic application of genotypic identification of mycobacteria. J. Med. Microbiol. 55:529–536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES